1
Andrefsky, William. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.
2
Holdaway, Simon, Stern, Nicola. A record in stone: the study of Australia’s flaked stone artefacts. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press 2004.
3
Inizan, Marie-Louise, Roche, Hélène, Tixier, Jacques, et al. The technology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary arabic, english, french, german, greek, italian, russian, spanish. Meudon: CREP 1992.
4
Odell, George H. Lithic analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2004.
5
Shea JJ. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
6
Whittaker, John C. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press 1994.
7
William Andrefsky Jr. The Analysis of Stone Tool Procurement, Production, and Maintenance. Journal of Archaeological Research. ;17:65–103.
8
George H. Odell. Stone Tool Research at the End of the Millennium: Procurement and Technology. Journal of Archaeological Research. ;8:269–331.
9
Andrefsky W. Ch. 2: Basics of stone tool production. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005:11–40.
10
Andrefsky W. Ch.5: Flake debitage attributes. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.
11
Holdaway, Simon, Stern, Nicola. A record in stone: the study of Australia’s flaked stone artefacts. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press 2004.
12
Inizan, Marie-Louise, Roche, Hélène, Tixier, Jacques, et al. The technology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary arabic, english, french, german, greek, italian, russian, spanish. Meudon: CREP 1992.
13
Odell GH. Ch. 3: Tool manufacture. Lithic analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2004:43–85.
14
Shea JJ. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
15
van Gijn AL. The biography of flint tools: methods of study. Flint in focus: lithic biographies in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Leiden: Sidestone Press 2010:11–34.
16
Ignacio de la Torre. Tècniques d’excavació en jaciments paleolítics. Alguns casos d’estudi. Treballs d’Arqueologia. Published Online First: 2014.
17
Whittaker JC. Ch. 2: Flintknapping: basic principles. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press 1994.
18
Cotterell B, Kamminga J. The mechanics of flaking. Lithic use-wear analysis. New York: Academic Press 1979:97–112.
19
Brian Cotterell and Johan Kamminga. The Formation of Flakes. American Antiquity. ;52:675–708.
20
Crabtree D. Notes on experiments in flintknapping: 4. Tools used for making flaked stone artefacts. Tebiwa: journal of the Idaho State University Museum of Natural History. 1967;10:60–71.
21
Harold L. Dibble and Mary C. Bernard. A Comparative Study of Basic Edge Angle Measurement Techniques. American Antiquity. ;45:857–65.
22
Dibble HL, Pelcin A. The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1995;22:429–39. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1995.0042
23
Dibble HL, Whittaker JC. New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1981;8:283–96. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(81)90004-2
24
Edmonds M. Lithic exploitation and use. Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: John Wiley 2001:461–70.
25
Eren MI, Greenspan A, Sampson CG. Are Upper Paleolithic blade cores more productive than Middle Paleolithic discoidal cores? A replication experiment. Journal of Human Evolution. 2008;55:952–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.009
26
Harrison R. Stone tools. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
27
Kuhn SL. A geometric index of reduction for unifacial stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1990;17:583–93. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(90)90038-7
28
Pelcin AW. The Formation of Flakes: The Role of Platform Thickness and Exterior Platform Angle in the Production of Flake Initiations and Terminations. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24:1107–13. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0190
29
Reti JS. Quantifying Oldowan Stone Tool Production at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. PLOS ONE. 2016;11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147352
30
Michael J. Shott. Size and Form in the Analysis of Flake Debris: Review and Recent Approaches. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. ;1:69–110.
31
Torre I, Mora R. Remarks on the current theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of early technological strategies in Eastern Africa. Interdisciplinary approaches to the Oldowan. Dordrecht: Springer 2008:15–24.
32
Bloxam E. Ancient quarries in mind: pathways to a more accessible significance. World Archaeology. 2011;43:149–66. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2011.579481
33
Edmonds, M. R. Ancestral geographies of the Neolithic: landscapes, monuments and memory. London: Routledge 1999.
34
Harmand S. Patterns of lithic raw material procurement and transformation during the Middle Paleolithic in Western Europe. Lithic materials and Paleolithic societies. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell 2009:15–24.
35
Spence MW, et al. State controlled procurement and the obsidian workshops of Teotihuacan, Mexico. Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984:97–105.
36
Stout D, Quade J, Semaw S, et al. Raw material selectivity of the earliest stone toolmakers at Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution. 2005;48:365–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.10.006
37
TaÇlon PSC. The power of stone: symbolic aspects of stone use and tool development in western Arnhem Land, Australia. Antiquity. 1991;65:192–207.
38
Turq A, Roebroeks W, Bourguignon L, et al. The fragmented character of Middle Palaeolithic stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution. 2013;65:641–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.014
39
Vermeersch PM, et al. Middle Palaeolithic chert mining in Egypt. Siliceous rocks and culture / A. Ramos-Millán and M. A. Bustillo (eds.). 173–93.
40
World Archaeology 2011: 2: Papers in this volume address aspects of quarrying and mining. http://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/results?sid=db06eaf9-f12c-421c-8584-8856400c1ab6%40sessionmgr4007&vid=1&hid=4207&bquery=JN+%22World+Archaeology%22+AND+DT+20110601&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHNoaWImZGI9YXN1JnR5cGU9MSZzaXRlPWVob3N0LWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d
41
Blades BS, Adams B, Wiley InterScience (Online service). Lithic materials and Paleolithic societies. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell 2009.
42
Adler et al. D. Between a rock and a hard place: Neanderthal-modern human interaction in the southern Caucasus. When Neanderthals and modern humans met. Tübingen: Kerns 2006:165–88.
43
William Andrefsky Jr. Raw-Material Availability and the Organization of Technology. American Antiquity. ;59:21–34.
44
Lewis R. Binford and James F. O’Connell. An Alyawara Day: The Stone Quarry. Journal of Anthropological Research. ;40:406–32.
45
Bloxam EG, et al. Hard stone quarrying in the Egyptian Old Kingdom (3rd millennium BC): rethinking the social organisation. ASMOSIA VII: actes du VIIe colloque international de l’ASMOSIA organisé par l’Ecole française d’Athènes, l20 septembre 2003 = proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Association for the Study of Marble and Other Stones in Antiquity. Athènes: Ecole française d’Athènes 2009:187–201.
46
Bloxam E. Miners and mistresses: Middle Kingdom mining on the margins. Journal of Social Archaeology. 2006;6:277–303.
47
Boivin N. From veneration to exploitation: human engagement with the mineral world. Soils, stones and symbols: cultural perceptions of the mineral world. London: UCL Press 2004:1–29.
48
Bradley R, Edmonds MR. Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993.
49
BRADLEY R, FORD S. THE SITING OF NEOLITHIC STONE QUARRIES?EXPERIMENTAL ARCHAEOLOGY AT GREAT LANGDALE, CUMBRIA. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 1986;5:123–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0092.1986.tb00348.x
50
Carter T, Poupeau G, Bressy C, et al. A new programme of obsidian characterization at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2006;33:893–909. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.023
51
Cooney G, Mandal S. Getting to the core of the problem: petrological results from the Irish Stone Axe Project. Antiquity. 1995;69:969–80.
52
Crabtree D. Notes on experiments in flintknapping: the flintknapper’s raw materials. Tebiwa: journal of the Idaho State University Museum of Natural History. 1967;10:8–24.
53
Edmonds, M. R. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: Routledge 1995.
54
Eren MI, Roos CI, Story BA, et al. The role of raw material differences in stone tool shape variation: an experimental assessment. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;49:472–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.034
55
Ericson, Jonathon E., Purdy, Barbara A. Prehistoric quarries and lithic production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984.
56
Féblot-Augustins J. Revisiting European Upper Paleolithic raw material Transfers: the demise of the cultural ecological paradigm? Lithic materials and Paleolithic societies. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2009:25–46.
57
Ford A, Stross F, Asaro F, et al. Obsidian Procurement and Distribution in the Tikal-Yaxha Intersite Area of the Central Maya Lowlands. Ancient Mesoamerica. 1997;8:101–10. doi: 10.1017/S0956536100001607
58
GALE NH. Mediterranean obsidian source characterisation by strontium isotope analysis. Archaeometry. 1981;23:41–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1981.tb00953.x
59
Richard A. Gould and Sherry Saggers. Lithic Procurement in Central Australia: A Closer Look at Binford’s Idea of Embeddedness in Archaeology. American Antiquity. ;50:117–36.
60
Healan DM. Pre-Hispanic Quarrying in the Ucareo-Zinapecuaro Obsidian Source Area. Ancient Mesoamerica. 1997;8:77–100. doi: 10.1017/S0956536100001590
61
Inizan et al. M-L. Chapter 1: Knapper stone. The technology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary arabic, english, french, german, greek, italian, russian, spanish. Meudon: CREP 1992:15–21.
62
George T. Jones, Charlotte Beck, Eric E. Jones and Richard E. Hughes. Lithic Source Use and Paleoarchaic Foraging Territories in the Great Basin. American Antiquity. ;68:5–38.
63
Knecht, Heidi. Projectile technology. New York: Plenum Press 1997.
64
Larsson L. The passage of axes: fire transformation of flint objects in the Neolithic of southern Sweden. Antiquity. 2000;74:602–10.
65
Luedtke, Barbara E., University of California, Los Angeles. An archaeologist’s guide to chert and flint. Los Angeles: Institute of Archaeology, University of California 1992.
66
Meignen L, et al. Patterns of lithic raw material procurement and transformation during the Middle Paleolithic in Western Europe. Prehistoric Quarries and Lithic Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984:15–24.
67
Douglas R. Mitchell and M. Steven Shackley. Classic Period Hohokam Obsidian Studies in Southern Arizona. Journal of Field Archaeology. ;22:291–304.
68
Russell, Miles. Flint mines in neolithic Britain. Stroud: Tempus 2000.
69
Torrence R. Monopoly or direct access. Industrial organization at the Melos obsidian quarries. Prehistoric quarries and lithic production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984:49–64.
70
Renfrew, Colin, Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. The obsidian trade. An Island polity: the archaeology of exploitation in Melos. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982:182–221.
71
Vermeersch et al. PM. Middle Palaeolithic chert mining in Egypt. Siliceous rocks and culture. Granada: Universidad de Granada 1997:173–93.
72
Arroyo A, Hirata S, Matsuzawa T, et al. Nut Cracking Tools Used by Captive Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Their Comparison with Early Stone Age Percussive Artefacts from Olduvai Gorge. PLOS ONE. 2016;11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166788
73
Carvalho S, et al. From pounding to knapping: how chimpanzees can help us to model hominin lithics. In: Sanz CM, Call J, Boesch C, eds. Tool Use in Animals: Cognition and Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013:226–41.
74
Carvalho S, Cunha E, Sousa C, et al. Chaînes opératoires and resource-exploitation strategies in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) nut cracking. Journal of Human Evolution. 2008;55:148–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.02.005
75
Fragaszy D, Izar P, Visalberghi E, et al. Wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus libidinosus) use anvils and stone pounding tools. American Journal of Primatology. 2004;64:359–66. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20085
76
Panger MA, Brooks AS, Richmond BG, et al. Older than the Oldowan? Rethinking the emergence of hominin tool use. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 2003;11:235–45. doi: 10.1002/evan.10094
77
McGrew WC. Chimpanzee Material Culture: Implications for Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1992.
78
Mercader J, Barton H, Gillespie J, et al. 4,300-Year-old chimpanzee sites and the origins of percussive stone technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:3043–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607909104
79
Mercader J. Excavation of a Chimpanzee Stone Tool Site in the African Rainforest. Science. 2002;296:1452–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1070268
80
Mora R, de la Torre I. Percussion tools in Olduvai Beds I and II (Tanzania): Implications for early human activities. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2005;24:179–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2004.12.001
81
Proffitt T, Luncz LV, Falótico T, et al. Wild monkeys flake stone tools. Nature. 2016;539:85–8. doi: 10.1038/nature20112
82
de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Arroyo A, et al. Experimental protocols for the study of battered stone anvils from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). Journal of Archaeological Science. 2013;40:313–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.007
83
DELAGNES A, ROCHE H. Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution. 2005;48:435–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.12.005
84
Leakey MD. Olduvai gorge: Vol.3: Excavations in beds I and II, 1960-1963. Cambridge: University Press 1971.
85
Lycett SJ, Gowlett JAJ. On questions surrounding the Acheulean ‘tradition’. World Archaeology. 2008;40:295–315. doi: 10.1080/00438240802260970
86
Semaw S, Renne P, Harris JWK, et al. 2.5-million-year-old stone tools from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature. 1997;385:333–6. doi: 10.1038/385333a0
87
Shea JJ. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
88
de la Torre I, Mora R. Remarks on the current theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of early technological strategies in Eastern Africa. Interdisciplinary approaches to the Oldowan. Dordrecht: Springer 2008:15–24.
89
Toth N. The oldowan reassessed: A close look at early stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1985;12:101–20. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(85)90056-1
90
Schick, Kathy Diane, Toth, Nicholas Patrick. The Oldowan: case studies into the earliest Stone Age. Gosport, IN: Stone Age Institute 2006.
91
Anna Belfer-Cohen and Naama Goren-Inbar. Cognition and Communication in the Levantine Lower Palaeolithic. World Archaeology. ;26:144–57.
92
Braun DR, Plummer T, Ditchfield P, et al. Oldowan behavior and raw material transport: perspectives from the Kanjera Formation. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35:2329–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.03.004
93
Braun DR, Tactikos JC, Ferraro JV, et al. Oldowan reduction sequences: methodological considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35:2153–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.01.015
94
Clark JD. The Acheulian industrial complex in Africa and elsewhere. Integrative paths to the past: paleoanthropological advances in honor of F. Clark Howell. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall 1994:451–69.
95
Edwards S. A modern knapper’s assessment of the technical skills of the Late Acheulean biface workers at Kalambo Falls. Kalambo Falls prehistoric site: 3: The earlier cultures : middle and earlier Stone Age ; assisted by Julie Cormack and Susan Chin ; with contributions by M. R. Kleindienst ... [et al.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001:605–11.
96
Gamble C, Marshall G. The shape of handaxes, the structure of the Acheulian world. A very remote period indeed: papers on the Palaeolithic presented to Derek Roe. Oxford: Oxbow 2001:19–27.
97
Goren-Inbar N, Grosman L, Sharon G. The technology and significance of the Acheulian giant cores of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov, Israel. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2011;38:1901–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2011.03.037
98
Goren-Inbar N. Culture and cognition in the Acheulian industry: a case study from Gesher Benot Yalhringaqov. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011;366:1038–49. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0365
99
Isaac G. Foundation stones: early artefacts as indicators of activities and abilities. Stone Age prehistory: studies in memory of Charles McBurney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986:221–41.
100
Peter Rasmussen Jones. Effects of Raw Materials on Biface Manufacture. Science. ;204:835–6.
101
Ludwig BV, Harris JWK. Towards a technological reassessment of East African plio-pleistocene lithic assemblages. Early human behaviour in the global context: the rise and diversity of the Lower Paleolithic Period. London: Routledge 1998:84–107.
102
Lycett SJ, Gowlett JAJ. On questions surrounding the Acheulean ‘tradition’. World Archaeology. 2008;40:295–315. doi: 10.1080/00438240802260970
103
Marke MW. Who made stone tools? Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005:243–56.
104
Mora R, de la Torre I. Percussion tools in Olduvai Beds I and II (Tanzania): Implications for early human activities. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2005;24:179–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2004.12.001
105
M. H. Newcomer. Some Quantitative Experiments in Handaxe Manufacture. World Archaeology. ;3:85–104.
106
Norton CJ, Bae K, Harris JWK, et al. Middle Pleistocene handaxes from the Korean Peninsula. Journal of Human Evolution. 2006;51:527–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.07.004
107
Petraglia MD, Shipton C. Large cutting tool variation west and east of the Movius Line. Journal of Human Evolution. 2008;55:962–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.11.007
108
Schick KD, Toth N, Garufi G, et al. Continuing Investigations into the Stone Tool-making and Tool-using Capabilities of a Bonobo (Pan paniscus). Journal of Archaeological Science. 1999;26:821–32. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1998.0350
109
Schick KD. The Movius line reconsidered: perspectives on the earlier Paleolithic of Eastern Asia. Integrative paths to the past: paleoanthropological advances in honor of F. Clark Howell. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall 1994:569–96.
110
Semaw S. The World’s Oldest Stone Artefacts from Gona, Ethiopia: Their Implications for Understanding Stone Technology and Patterns of Human Evolution Between 2·6–1·5 Million Years Ago. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2000;27:1197–214. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1999.0592
111
Sharon G, Alperson-Afil N, Goren-Inbar N. Cultural conservatism and variability in the Acheulian sequence of Gesher Benot Ya‘aqov☆. Journal of Human Evolution. 2011;60:387–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.11.012
112
Shimelmitz R, Barkai R, Gopher A. Systematic blade production at late Lower Paleolithic (400–200 kyr) Qesem Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution. 2011;61:458–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.06.003
113
Spikins P. Goodwill hunting? Debates over the ‘meaning’ of Lower Palaeolithic handaxe form revisited. World Archaeology. 2012;44:378–92. doi: 10.1080/00438243.2012.725889
114
Stout D, Chaminade T. The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:1091–100. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.014
115
Stout D, Quade J, Semaw S, et al. Raw material selectivity of the earliest stone toolmakers at Gona, Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Human Evolution. 2005;48:365–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.10.006
116
de la Torre I. The origins of stone tool technology in Africa: a historical perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2011;366:1028–37. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0350
117
Torre I de la, Mora R, Martínez-Moreno J. The early Acheulean in Peninj (Lake Natron, Tanzania). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2008;27:244–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jaa.2007.12.001
118
de la Torre I, Mora R, Domı́nguez-Rodrigo M, et al. The Oldowan industry of Peninj and its bearing on the reconstruction of the technological skills of LowerPleistocene hominids. Journal of Human Evolution. 2003;44:203–24. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2484(02)00206-3
119
Wynn T. Archaeology and cognitive evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2002;25. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000079
120
T. Wynn and W. C. McGrew. An Ape’s View of the Oldowan. Man. ;24:383–98.
121
Boeda E. Levallois: a volumetric construction, methods and technique. The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Madison, Wis: Prehistory Press 1995:41–68.
122
Debénath, André, Dibble, Harold Lewis. Handbook of paleolithic typology. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1993.
123
Dibble, Harold Lewis, Bar-Yosef, Ofer. The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Madison, Wis: Prehistory Press 1995.
124
Inizan, Marie-Louise, Roche, Hélène, Tixier, Jacques, et al. The technology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary arabic, english, french, german, greek, italian, russian, spanish. Meudon: CREP 1992.
125
Peresani, Marco. Discoid lithic technology: Advances and implications. Oxford: Archaeopress 2003.
126
Shea JJ. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
127
Bar-Yosef O, Meignen L. Insights into Levantine Middle Palaeolithic cultural variability. The Middle Paleolithic: adaptation, behavior, and variability. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1992:163–80.
128
Bar‐Yosef O, Van Peer P. The Chaine Operatoire Approach in Middle Paleolithic Archaeology. Current Anthropology. 2009;50:103–31. doi: 10.1086/592234
129
Culley EV, Popescu G, Clark GA. An analysis of the compositional integrity of the Levantine Mousterian facies. Quaternary International. 2013;300:213–33. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.11.030
130
Delanges A, Meignen L. Diversity of lithic production systems during the Middle Paleolithic in France. Transitions before the transition: evolution and stability in the Middle Paleolithic and Middle Stone Age. New York: Springer 2006:85–107.
131
Dibble HL, Aldeias V, Jacobs Z, et al. On the industrial attributions of the Aterian and Mousterian of the Maghreb. Journal of Human Evolution. 2013;64:194–210. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2012.10.010
132
Eren MI, Greenspan A, Sampson CG. Are Upper Paleolithic blade cores more productive than Middle Paleolithic discoidal cores? A replication experiment. Journal of Human Evolution. 2008;55:952–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.07.009
133
Groucutt HS, Scerri EML, Lewis L, et al. Stone tool assemblages and models for the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa. Quaternary International. 2015;382:8–30. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.01.039
134
Martínez-Moreno J, Mora R. The Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition in Cova Gran (Catalunya, Spain) and the extinction of Neanderthals in the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Human Evolution. 2010;58:211–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2009.09.002
135
Mcbrearty S, Brooks AS. The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution. 2000;39:453–563. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0435
136
L Meignen. Early Middle Palaeolithic blade technology in Southwestern Asia. Acta Anthropological Sinica. 2000;19:158–68.
137
Olszewski DI, Dibble HL, McPherron SP, et al. Nubian Complex strategies in the Egyptian high desert. Journal of Human Evolution. 2010;59:188–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.06.001
138
Peresani M. Discoid lithic technology: Advances and implications. Oxford: Archaeopress 2003.
139
Rose JI, Usik VI, Marks AE, et al. The Nubian Complex of Dhofar, Oman: An African Middle Stone Age Industry in Southern Arabia. PLoS ONE. 2011;6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028239
140
Reynolds T. The Middle Palaeolithic of Cyrenaica: Is there an Aterian at the Haua Fteah and does it matter? Quaternary International. 2013;300:171–81. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.09.025
141
Scerri EML. The Aterian and its place in the North African Middle Stone Age. Quaternary International. 2013;300:111–30. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.09.008
142
Sellet F. Levallois or not Levallois? Does it really matter? Learning from the African case. The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Madison, Wis: Prehistory Press 1995:25–40.
143
Shea JJ. Sink the Mousterian? Named stone tool industries (NASTIES) as obstacles to investigating hominin evolutionary relationships in the Later Middle Paleolithic Levant. Quaternary International. 2014;350:169–79. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.01.024
144
Shea JJ. Spear Points from the Middle Paleolithic of the Levant. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1988;15:441–50. doi: 10.1179/jfa.1988.15.4.441
145
John J. Shea. The Middle Paleolithic of the East Mediterranean Levant. Journal of World Prehistory. 2003;17:313–94.
146
Shea JJ. The Middle Paleolithic: Early Modern Humans and Neandertals in the Levant. Near Eastern Archaeology. 2001;64. doi: 10.2307/3210819
147
Soriano S, Villa P, Wadley L. Blade technology and tool forms in the Middle Stone Age of South Africa: the Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort at Rose Cottage Cave. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2007;34:681–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.06.017
148
Turq A, Roebroeks W, Bourguignon L, et al. The fragmented character of Middle Palaeolithic stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution. 2013;65:641–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.014
149
Tryon CA, McBrearty S, Texier P-J. Levallois Lithic Technology from the Kapthurin Formation, Kenya: Acheulian Origin and Middle Stone Age Diversity. African Archaeological Review. 2006;22:199–229. doi: 10.1007/s10437-006-9002-5
150
Usik VI, Rose JI, Hilbert YH, et al. Nubian Complex reduction strategies in Dhofar, southern Oman. Quaternary International. 2013;300:244–66. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.08.2111
151
Van Peer P. Refitting of lithic reduction sequences, formal classificarion systems and Middle Palaeolithic individuals at work. Fitting rocks: lithic refitting examined. Oxford: Archaeopress 2007:91–103.
152
Van Peer P. The Nile Corridor and the Out‐of‐Africa Model An Examination of the Archaeological Record. Current Anthropology. 1998;39:S115–40. doi: 10.1086/204692
153
Van Peer P. Current issues in the Levallois problem. The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Madison, Wis: Prehistory Press 1995:1–10.
154
Vaquero M, Vallverdu J, Rosell J, et al. Neandertal Behavior at the Middle Palaeolithic Site of Abric Romani, Capellades, Spain. Journal of Field Archaeology. 2001;28. doi: 10.2307/3181461
155
Villa P, Delagnes A, Wadley L. A late Middle Stone Age artifact assemblage from Sibudu (KwaZulu-Natal): comparisons with the European Middle Paleolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2005;32:399–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.11.007
156
Francois Bordes and Denise de Sonneville-Bordes. The Significance of Variability in Palaeolithic Assemblages. World Archaeology. ;2:61–73.
157
Jean-Paul Caspar and Marc De Bie. Preparing for the Hunt in the Late Paleolithic Camp at Rekem, Belgium. Journal of Field Archaeology. ;23:437–60.
158
Churchill SE, Smith FH. Makers of the early Aurignacian of Europe. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2001;113:61–115.
159
Conard NJ, Bolus M. Radiocarbon dating the appearance of modern humans and timing of cultural innovations in Europe: new results and new challenges. Journal of Human Evolution. 2003;44:331–71. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2484(02)00202-6
160
Hublin J-J, Spoor F, Braun M, et al. A late Neanderthal associated with Upper Palaeolithic artefacts. Nature. 1996;381:224–6. doi: 10.1038/381224a0
161
The Late Upper Palaeolithic Lithic Collection from Gough’s Cave, Cheddar, Somerset and Human Use of the cave. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 2004;70:1–92.
162
d’Errico F, Zilhao J, Julien M, et al. Neanderthal Acculturation in Western Europe? A Critical Review of the Evidence and Its Interpretation. Current Anthropology. 1998;39:S1–44. doi: 10.1086/204689
163
D’Errico F. The invisible frontier. A multiple species model for the origin of behavioral modernity. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 2003;12:188–202. doi: 10.1002/evan.10113
164
Mcbrearty S, Brooks AS. The revolution that wasn’t: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution. 2000;39:453–563. doi: 10.1006/jhev.2000.0435
165
Mellars P. The Neanderthal Problem Continued. Current Anthropology. 1999;40:341–64. doi: 10.1086/200024
166
Smith, Christopher. Late Stone Age hunters of the British Isles. London: Routledge 1992.
167
Piel-Desruisseaux, Jean-Luc. Outils préhistoriques: forme, fabrication, utilisation. Paris: Masson 1986.
168
Shea JJ. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
169
Tixier, Jacques. Typologie de l’épipaléolithique du Maghreb. Paris: Arts et métiers graphiques 1963.
170
Tixier, Jacques. Glossary for the description of stone tools: with special reference to the epipalaeolithic of the Maghreb. Pullman, Wash: Washington State University 1974.
171
João Zilhão and Francesco d’Errico. The Chronology and Taphonomy of the Earliest Aurignacian and Its Implications for the Understanding of Neandertal Extinction. Journal of World Prehistory. ;13:1–68.
172
Jean-Paul Caspar and Marc De Bie. Preparing for the Hunt in the Late Paleolithic Camp at Rekem, Belgium. Journal of Field Archaeology. ;23:437–60.
173
The Late Upper Palaeolithic Lithic Collection from Gough’s Cave, Cheddar, Somerset and Human Use of the cave. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 2004;70:1–92.
174
Michael Jochim, Cynthia Herhahn and Harry Starr. The Magdalenian Colonization of Southern Germany. American Anthropologist. ;101:129–42.
175
Jochim, Michael A. Hunter-gatherer subsistence and settlement: a predictive model. New York: Academic Press 1976.
176
Karlin et al. C. Some socio-economic aspects of the knapping process among groups of hunter-gatherers in the Paris Basin area. The use of tools by human and non-human primates. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1993:318–37.
177
Finlay N. Microliths and Multiple Authorship. Mesolithic on the move: papers presented at the Sixth International Conference on the Mesolithic in Europe, Stockholm 2000. Oxford: Oxbow 2003:169–76.
178
Mellars, Paul. The early post glacial settlement of Northern Europe: an ecological perspective. London: Duckworth 1978.
179
T. Douglas Price. The Mesolithic of Western Europe. Journal of World Prehistory. ;1:225–305.
180
Reynier, Michael. Early Mesolithic Britain: origins, development and directions. Oxford: Archaeopress 2005.
181
Shea JJ. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
182
Addington, Lucile R. Lithic illustration: drawing flaked stone artifacts for publication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1986.
183
Adkins, Lesley, Adkins, Roy. Archaeological illustration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1989.
184
Martingell, Hazel, Saville, Alan, Association of Archaeological Illustrators & Surveyors, et al. The illustration of lithic artefacts. Association of Archaeological Illustrators & Surveyors 1988.
185
Bretzke K, Conard NJ. Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2012;39:3741–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.039
186
Bretzke K, Conard NJ. Evaluating morphological variability in lithic assemblages using 3D models of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2012;39:3741–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.039
187
McPherron SP, Gernat T, Hublin J-J. Structured light scanning for high-resolution documentation of in situ archaeological finds. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2009;36:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.028
188
Olson BR, Gordon JM, Runnels C, et al. EXPERIMENTAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING OF A LOWER PALAEOLITHIC HANDAXE: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ANALYTICAL VALUE. Lithic Technology. 2014;39:162–72. doi: 10.1179/2051618514Y.0000000004
189
Palaeolithic archaeology and 3D visualization technology: recent developments. Antiquity. 2002;76:929–30.
190
Michael J. Shott and Brian W. Trail. EXPLORING NEW APPROACHES TO LITHIC ANALYSIS: LASER SCANNING AND GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS. Lithic Technology. 2010;35:195–220.
191
Whittaker JC. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press 1994.
192
Brézillon MN, Centre national de la recherche scientifique (France). La dénomination des objets de pierre taillée: matériaux pour un vocabulaire des préhistoriens de langue française. Paris: Éditions du Centre national de la Recherche scientifique 1968.
193
Inizan M-L, Roche H, Tixier J, et al. The technology of knapped stone: followed by a multilingual vocabulary arabic, english, french, german, greek, italian, russian, spanish. Meudon: CREP 1992.
194
Piel-Desruisseaux J-L. Outils préhistoriques: forme, fabrication, utilisation. Outils préhistoriques: du galet taillé au bistouri d’obsidienne. Paris: Dunod 2012.
195
Newcomer M. ‘Punch technique’ and Upper Palaeolithic blades. Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. The Hague: Mouton 1975:97–102.
196
Pitts MW. On the shape of waste flakes as an index of technological change in lithic industries. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1978;5:17–37. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(78)90016-X
197
Owen L. Blade core reduction strategies: selected examples. Early man news. 1989;14:71–89.
198
Pelegrin J. Sure une recherche experimentale des techniques de debitage laminaire. Archéologie expérimentale: actes du Colloque international ‘Expérimentation en archéologie, bilan et perspectives’, tenu à l’Archéodrome de Beaune les 6, 7, 8 et 9 avril 1988. Paris: Editions Errance 1991:118–28.
199
Speth JD. Experimental investigations of hard-hammer percussion flaking. Tebiwa: journal of the Idaho State University Museum of Natural History. 1974;17:7–35.
200
Speth JD. Experimental investigations of hard-hammer percussion flaking. Experimental archeology. New York: Columbia University Press 1977:3–37.
201
Tixier J. Le debitage par pression. Préhistoire de la pierre taillée 2, Économie du débitage laminaire. 57–70.
202
Tuohy DR. A comparison of pressure and percussion debitage from a Crabtree obsidian stoneworking demonstration. Tebiwa: journal of the Idaho State University Museum of Natural History. 1987;23:23–30.
203
Gijn AL van. Flint in focus: lithic biographies in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Leiden: Sidestone Press 2010.
204
Budziszewski J. Flint economy in Chalcolithic societies of East-Central Europe. Stone age - mining age. Bochum: Deutsches Bergbau-Museum 2006:315–28.
205
Gatsov I. The latest results from the technological and typological analysis of chipped stone assemblages from Ilipinar, Pendik, Fikir tele and Mentes. Documenta praehistorica: Poročilo o raziskovanju paleolitika, neolitika in eneolitika v Sloveniji. 2003;30:53–60.
206
Gatsov I. Chipped stone assemblages from South Bulgaria and North-west Turkey. Epipalaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic. Technology, style and society: contributions to the innovations between the Alps and the Black Sea in prehistory. Oxford: Archaeopress 2000:1–28.
207
Gatsov I, Gurova M. Some remarks on the chipped stone industry of the earliest Neolithic cultures in Bulgaria. Problemy epoki kamienia na obszarze starego świata =: Problems of the stone age in the old world. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagiellon̋ski, Instytut Archeologii 2001:249–64.
208
Kozlowski JK. The lithic industry of the Eastern Linear Pottery culture in Slovakia. Slovenská archeologia =: Slovak archeology. 1989;37:259–93.
209
Kozlowski JK, Kozlowski SK. Chipped stone industries from Lepenski Vir, Yugoslavia. Preistoria alpina : rivista annuale della Sezione di Paletnologia, Museo Tridentino di Scienze Natural. 1984;19:259–93.
210
Kozlowski JK, Kaczanowksa M. Chipped stone industry of the Vinca Culture. Vinča and its world: international symposium : The Danubian region from 6000 to 3000 B.C. : Belgrade, Smederevska Palanka, October 1988. Beograd: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts 1990:1–136.
211
Manolakakis L. Les industries lithiques énéolithiques de Bulgarie. Rahden/Westf: Marie Leidorf 2005.
212
Mateicuicova I. Mesolithic traditions and the origins of the Linear Pottery culture (LBK). LBK dialogues: studies in the formation of the linear pottery culture. Oxford: Archaeopress 2004:91–107.
213
Starnini E. Typological and technological analysis of the Koros culture stone assemblages of Mehtelek Nadas (North East Hungary), a preliminary report. Nyíregyházi Jósa András Múzeum Evkonyve : Jahrbuch des Jósa András Museums von Nyíregyhá. 101–10.
214
Allard P, Burnez-Lanotte L. Surplus production in the Belgian Linearbandkeramik: blade debitage at Verlaine ‘Petit Paradis’ (Verlaine, Hesbaye, Belgium). Stone age - mining age. Bochum: Deutsches Bergbau-Museum 2006:37–54.
215
Burnez-Lanotte L, International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences. Production and management of lithic materials in the European Linearbandkeramik: Gestion des matériaux lithiques dans la Rubané européen : acts of the XIVth UISPP Congress, Univeristy of Liège, Belgium, 2-8 September 2001. Oxford: Archaeopress 2003.
216
Cahen D. Technologie de la debitage laminaire. Les Fouilles de la place Saint-Lambert à Liège / travaux réalisés par le Centre interdisciplinaire de recherches archéologiques de l’Université de Liège ; sous la direction de Marcel Otte ; avec la collaboration de Franz Camps ... [et al.]. 171–98.
217
Caspar J-P. Chipped stone industries of the linearband pottery culture (LBP): techniques, morphology and function of the implemenets in Belgian and Polish assemblages. Helinium : revue consacré à l’archéologie des Pays-Bas, de la Belgique et du Grand-Duché de Lux. 1989;39:157–205.
218
De Grooth M. The organisation of flint tool manufacture in the Dutch Neolithic. Analecta praehistorica Leidensia. 1987;20:27–51.
219
De Grooth M. In search of Bandkeramik specialist flintknappers. Rubane & Cardial: actes du colloque de Liège, novembre 1988. Liège: Université de Liège 1990:89–93.
220
De Grooth M. Technological and socio-economic aspects of Bandkeramik flint-working. The big puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Bonn: Holos 1990:197–210.
221
Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. Instituut voor Prehistorie. Flint: procurement and distribution strategies: technological aspects. In: van der Velde P, ed. Analecta praehistorica Leidensia. Leiden: Leiden University Press 2007.
222
Gronenborn D. Mesolithic-Neolithic interactions. The lithic industries of the earliest bandceramic site at Friedberg-Bruchenbrucken, Wetteraukreis (West Germany). Contributions to the Mesolithic in Europe: papers presented at the Fourth International Symposium, The Mesolithic in Europe, Leuven, 1990. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press 1990:173–82.
223
Kaczanowska M, Lech J. The flint industry of Danubian communities north of the Carpathians. Acta archaeologica Carpathica. 1977;17:5–28.
224
Pavlu I, Rulf J. Stone industry from the Neolithic site of Bylany. Pamatky archeologicke. 2 AD;1991:277–365.
225
Zimmermann A. Some aspects of the formation of flint assemblages. Chipped stone industries of the early farming cultures in Europe. [Warszawa]: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego 1987:187–201.
226
Pelegrin J. La production des grandes lames de silex du Grand Pressigny. Matériaux, productions, circulations du néolithique à l’Âge du bronze / sous la direction de Jean Guilaine. 131–50.
227
In search of Hindsgavl: experiments in the production of Neolithic Danish flint daggers. Antiquity. 1998;72:338–49.
228
van Gijn AL. The cultural biography of the Scandinavian daggers in the northern Netherlands. In: Frieman C, Eriksen BV, eds. Flint daggers in prehistoric Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books 2015:76–82.
229
Butler C. Prehistoric flintwork. Stroud: Tempus 2005.
230
Green HS. The flint arrowheads of the British Isles: a detailed study of material from England and Wales with comparanda from Scotland and Ireland. Oxford: BAR 1980.
231
Lech J, Longworth I. The Grimes Graves flint mine site in the light of two late Neolithic workshop assemblages: a second approach. Stone age - mining age. Bochum: Deutsches Bergbau-Museum 2006:413–22.
232
Mercer RJ, Saville A. Grimes Graves, Norfolk: excavations 1971-72, Vol.2: The flint assemblage. London: H.M.S.O. 1981.
233
Bettinger RL. Holocene hunter-gatherers. Archaeology at the millennium: a sourcebook. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2001:137–95.
234
Close AE. Backed bladelets are a foreign country. Thinking small: global perspectives on microlithization. Arlington, Va: American Anthropological Assn 2002:31–44.
235
Kelterborn P. Towards replicating Egyptian predynastic flint knives. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1984;11:433–53. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(84)90023-2
236
Rosen SA. Lithic industries during the Holocene period. A companion to the archaeology of the ancient Near East. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2012:236–60.
237
Shea JJ. Lithic Modes A–I: A New Framework for Describing Global-Scale Variation in Stone Tool Technology Illustrated with Evidence from the East Mediterranean Levant. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2013;20:151–86. doi: 10.1007/s10816-012-9128-5
238
Shea JJ. Stone Tools in the Paleolithic and Neolithic Near East: A Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
239
Shirai N. The archaeology of the first farmer-herders in Egypt: new insights into the Fayum Epipalaeolithic and Neolithic. [Leiden]: Leiden University Press 2010.
240
Shirai N. A missing chapter of ‘The Desert Fayum’: Fayum lithic artefact collection in the Allard Pierson Museum, Amsterdam. Archéo-nil Lettre d’information / Société pour l’étude des cultures prépharaoniques de la vallée du. 2011;21:115–46.
241
The Desert Fayum at 80: revisiting a Neolithic farming community in Egypt. Antiquity. 2016;90:1181–95.
242
Roubet C. Methods of analysis of grinding implements. The prehistory of Wadi Kubbaniya. Dallas, Tex: Southern Methodist University Press 1986:470–2.
243
Roubet C. Report on Site E-82-1. The prehistory of Wadi Kubbaniya. Dallas, Tex: Southern Methodist University Press 1986:610–588.
244
Katherine WRIGHT. A CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR GROUND STONE TOOLS FROM THE PREHISTORIC LEVANT. Paléorient. 1992;18:53–81.
245
Jenny L. Adams. Use-Wear Analyses on Manos and Hide-Processing Stones. Journal of Field Archaeology. ;15:307–15.
246
Bellina B. Beads, social change and interaction between India and South-east Asia. Antiquity. 2003;77:285–97.
247
Sugiyama Y, Koman J. Tool-using and -making behavior in wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea. Primates. 1979;20:513–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02373433
248
Mitekufat Haeven et al. M. Rolling stones: basalt implements as evidence for trade/exchange in the Levantine Epipalaeolithic. Mitekufat haeven: journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society. 2001;31:25–42.
249
The Social Origins of Cooking and Dining in Early Villages of Western Asia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 2000;66:89–121.
250
Wright K. Dhuweila: Ground stone. The Harra and the Hamad: excavations and surveys in Eastern Jordan. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic 1998:121–34.
251
Katherine I. Wright. Ground-Stone Tools and Hunter-Gatherer Subsistence in Southwest Asia: Implications for the Transition to Farming. American Antiquity. ;59:238–63.
252
Wright KI. Early Holocene Ground Stone Assemblages in the Levant. Levant. 1993;25:93–111. doi: 10.1179/lev.1993.25.1.93
253
Katherine WRIGHT. A CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR GROUND STONE TOOLS FROM THE PREHISTORIC LEVANT. Paléorient. ;18:53–81.
254
Wright K, Garrard A. Social identities and the expansion of stone bead-making in Neolithic Western Asia: new evidence from Jordan. Antiquity. 2003;77:267–84.
255
Cziesla E. On refitting stone artefacts. The big puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Bonn: Holos 1990:9–44.
256
Cziesla E, International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts. The big puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Bonn: Holos 1990.
257
Hofman JL. Putting the pieces together: an introduction to refitting. Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology. Bar 1992:1–20.
258
Larson ML, Ingbar EE. Perspectives on refitting: critique and a complementary approach. Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology. Bar 1992:151–62.
259
Schurmans U, De Bie M. Fitting rocks: lithic refitting examined. Oxford: Archaeopress 2007.
260
Bodu P, et al. Who’s who? The Magdalenian flintknappers of Pincevent (France). The big puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Bonn: Holos 1990:143–63.
261
François Bordes and J. Briard. Actualité scientifique. Question de contemporaneite: i’illuson des remontages. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française. 1980;132–5.
262
D. Cahen, F. Bordes, Henri Laville, Claude Masset and Emmanuel Vigneron. Actualité scientifique. Savez-vous remonter les caillous a la mode de chez nous. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française. 1980;232–4.
263
D. Cahen, F. Bordes, Henri Laville, Claude Masset and Emmanuel Vigneron. Actualité scientifique. Question de contemporaneite: l’apport des remontage. Bulletin de la Société préhistorique française. 1980;230–2.
264
Cahen D. Refitting stone artefacts: why bother? The human uses of flint and chert: proceedings of the Fourth International Flint Symposium held at Brighton Polytechnic, 10-15 April 1983. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987:1–9.
265
D. Cahen, L. H. Keeley, F. L. Van Noten, Jeffery A. Behm, Colin I. Busby, Robert C. Dunnell, Brian Hayden, L. Lewis Johnson, Paul Katz, G. C. Mohapatra, Hallam L. Movius, Jr., Karl J. Narr, Mark Newcomer, Raymond R. Newell, George H. Odell, Milla Y. Ohel, K. Paddayya, R. Pittioni, Derek A. Roe, John Tomenchuk and Thomas G. Wynn. Stone Tools, Toolkits, and Human Behavior in Prehistory [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 1979;20:661–83.
266
Cooper JR, Qiu F. Expediting and standardizing stone artifact refitting using a computerized suitability model. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2006;33:987–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.11.005
267
De Bie M. Benefiting from refitting intra-site analysis. Lessons from Rekem (Belgium). Fitting rocks: lithic refitting examined. Oxford: Archaeopress 2007:31–44.
268
De Loecker DI, et al. A refitter’s paradise: on the conjoining of artefacts at Maastricht-Belvedere (The Netherlands). Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003:113–36.
269
DELAGNES A, ROCHE H. Late Pliocene hominid knapping skills: The case of Lokalalei 2C, West Turkana, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution. 2005;48:435–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.12.005
270
Gilead I, Fabian P. Conjoinable artefacts from the Middle Palaeolithic open air site Fara II, Northern Negev, Israel: a preliminary report. The big puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Bonn: Holos 1990:101–12.
271
Hofman J. Putting the pieces together: an introduction to refitting. Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology. Bar 1992:1–20.
272
Laughlin JP, Kelly RL. Experimental analysis of the practical limits of lithic refitting. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2010;37:427–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.10.007
273
Petraglia MD. Stone artifact refitting and formation processes at the Abri Dufaure, an Upper Palaeolithic site in southwest France. Piecing together the past: applications of refitting studies in archaeology. Bar 1992:163–78.
274
Understanding Levallois: Lithic Technology and Cognitive Archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1996;6:231–54.
275
Schurmans U. Refitting in the Old and New Worlds. Fitting rocks: lithic refitting examined. Oxford: Archaeopress 2007:7–23.
276
de la Torre I, et al. When bones are not enough: lithic refits and occupation dynamics in the Middle Palaeolithic Level 10 of Roca dels Bous (Catalonia, Spain). Bones for tools - tools for bones: the interplay between objects and objectives. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2012:13–23.
277
Turq A, Roebroeks W, Bourguignon L, et al. The fragmented character of Middle Palaeolithic stone tool technology. Journal of Human Evolution. 2013;65:641–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.07.014
278
van Peer Ph. Refitting of lithic reduction sequences, formal classification systems and Middle Palaeolithic individuals at work. Fitting rocks: lithic refitting examined. Oxford: Archaeopress 2007:91–103.
279
Weiner D. ‘The refitters failure’. Some criteria concerning the duration of settlement through refitting. The big puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Bonn: Holos 1990:477–92.
280
Richard W. Yerkes and P. Nick Kardulias. Recent Developments in the Analysis of Lithic Artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Research. 1993;1:89–119.
281
Odell GH. Tool function: chapter 5. Lithic analysis. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2004:135–74.
282
Fullagar R. Residues and use-wear. Archaeology in practice: a student guide to archaeological analyses. Malden, MA: Blackwell 2006:207–34.
283
Piperno DR, Weiss E, Holst I, et al. Processing of wild cereal grains in the Upper Palaeolithic revealed by starch grain analysis. Nature. 2004;430:670–3. doi: 10.1038/nature02734
284
Ruth Tringham, Glenn Cooper, George Odell, Barbara Voytek and Anne Whitman. Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1974;1:171–96.
285
Van Gijn AL. Science and interpretation in microwear studies. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;48:166–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.024
286
Gijn AL van. The biography of flint tools: methods of study. Flint in focus: lithic biographies in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Leiden: Sidestone Press 2010:11–34.
287
Adams JL. Use-Wear Analyses on Manos and Hide-Processing Stones. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1988;15. doi: 10.2307/530311
288
Adams J, et al. Functional analysis of macro-lithic artefacts: a focus on working surfaces. Non-flint raw material use in prehistory: old prejudices and new directions = L’utilisation préhistorique de matières premières lithiques alternatives : anciens préjugés, nouvelles perspectives. Oxford: Archaepress 2009:43–66.
289
Borel A, Ollé A, Vergès JM, et al. Scanning Electron and Optical Light Microscopy: two complementary approaches for the understanding and interpretation of usewear and residues on stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;48:46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.031
290
Burroni D, Donahue RE, Pollard AM, et al. The Surface Alteration Features of Flint Artefacts as a Record of Environmental Processes. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2002;29:1277–87. doi: 10.1006/jasc.2001.0771
291
BYRNE L, OLLÉ A, VERGÈS JM. UNDER THE HAMMER: RESIDUES RESULTING FROM PRODUCTION AND MICROWEAR ON EXPERIMENTAL STONE TOOLS. Archaeometry. 2006;48:549–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00272.x
292
Caspar J-P, Bie MD. Preparing for the Hunt in the Late Paleolithic Camp at Rekem, Belgium. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1996;23. doi: 10.2307/530547
293
Craig OE, Collins MJ. The Removal of Protein from Mineral Surfaces: Implications for Residue Analysis of Archaeological Materials. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2002;29:1077–82. doi: 10.1006/jasc.2001.0757
294
T. P. Denham, S. G. Haberle, C. Lentfer, R. Fullagar, J. Field, M. Therin, N. Porch and B. Winsborough. Origins of Agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of New Guinea. Science. 2003;301:189–93.
295
Dockall JE. Wear Traces and Projectile Impact: A Review of the Experimental and Archaeological Evidence. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1997;24. doi: 10.2307/530688
296
Donahue RE, Burroni DB. Lithic microwear analysis and the formation of archaeological assemblages. Lithics in action: papers from the conference ‘Lithic Studies in the Year 2000’. Oxford: Oxbow 2004:140–8.
297
Dubreuil L. Long-term trends in Natufian subsistence: a use-wear analysis of ground stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2004;31:1613–29. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.04.003
298
Evans AA, Donahue RE. Laser scanning confocal microscopy: a potential technique for the study of lithic microwear. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35:2223–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.02.006
299
Evans AA, Macdonald D. Using metrology in early prehistoric stone tool research: further work and a brief instrument comparison. Scanning. 2011;33:294–303. doi: 10.1002/sca.20272
300
Faulks NR, Kimball LR, Hidjrati N, et al. Atomic force microscopy of microwear traces on Mousterian tools from Myshtylagty Lagat (Weasel Cave), Russia. Scanning. 2011;33:304–15. doi: 10.1002/sca.20273
301
Fiedel S. Blood from Stones? Some Methodological and Interpretive Problems in Blood Residue Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1996;23:139–47. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0011
302
Grace R. The limitations and applications of use-wear analysis. The interpretative possibilities of microwear studies: proceedings of the International Conference on Lithic Use-wear Analysis, 15th-17th February 1989 in Uppsala, Sweden. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis 1990:9–14.
303
Hamon C. Functional analysis of stone grinding and polishing tools from the earliest Neolithic of north-western Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35:1502–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.10.017
304
Hardy BL, Garufi GT. Identification of Woodworking on Stone Tools through Residue and Use-Wear Analyses: Experimental Results. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1998;25:177–84. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1997.0234
305
Hardy BL, Raff RA, Raman V. Recovery of Mammalian DNA from Middle Paleolithic Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24:601–11. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0144
306
Ibáñez Estévez, Juan José, González Urquijo, Jesús Emilio. From tool use to site function: use-wear analysis on some final Upper Palaeolithic sites in the Basque country. Oxford: Tempus Reparatum 1996.
307
Ibanez JJ, Gonzalez JE. Use-wear in the 1990s in western Europe: potential and limitations of a method. Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003:163–72.
308
Jahren AH, Toth N, Schick K, et al. Determining Stone Tool Use: Chemical and Morphological Analyses of Residues on Experimentally Manufactured Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24:245–50. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0107
309
Helle Juel Jensen. Functional Analysis of Prehistoric Flint Tools by High-Power Microscopy: A Review of West European Research. Journal of World Prehistory. ;2:53–88.
310
Juel Jensen, Helle. Flint tools and plant working: hidden traces of Stone Age technology. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press 1994.
311
Kealhofer L, Torrence R, Fullagar R. Integrating Phytoliths within Use-Wear/Residue Studies of Stone Tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1999;26:527–46. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1998.0332
312
Keeley, Lawrence H. Experimental determination of stone tool uses: a microwear analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1980.
313
Keeley LH, Toth N. Microwear polishes on early stone tools from Koobi Fora, Kenya. Nature. 1981;293:464–5. doi: 10.1038/293464a0
314
Keeley LH, Newcomer MH. Microwear analysis of experimental flint tools: a test case. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1977;4:29–62. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(77)90111-X
315
Kooyman B, Newman ME, Ceri H. Verifying the reliability of blood residue analysis on archaeological tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1992;19:265–9. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(92)90016-V
316
Lemorini C, Stiner MC, Gopher A, et al. Use-wear analysis of an Amudian laminar assemblage from the Acheuleo-Yabrudian of Qesem Cave, Israel. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2006;33:921–34. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.019
317
Liu L, Field J, Fullagar R, et al. A functional analysis of grinding stones from an early holocene site at Donghulin, North China. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2010;37:2630–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.05.023
318
Lombard M. Finding resolution for the Howiesons Poort through the microscope: micro-residue analysis of segments from Sibudu Cave, South Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35:26–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.02.021
319
Lombard M, Wadley L. The morphological identification of micro-residues on stone tools using light microscopy: progress and difficulties based on blind tests. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2007;34:155–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.04.008
320
Thomas H. Loy and E. James Dixon. Blood Residues on Fluted Points from Eastern Beringia. American Antiquity. 1998;63:21–46.
321
Moss EH. Some comments on edge damage as a factor in functional analysis of stone artifacts. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1983;10:231–42. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(83)90006-7
322
Newcomer M, Grace R, Unger-Hamilton R. Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1986;13:203–17. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(86)90059-2
323
Ollé A, Vergès JM. The use of sequential experiments and SEM in documenting stone tool microwear. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;48:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.028
324
Owen LR. Material worked by hunter and gatherer groups of northern North America: implications for use-wear analysis. Traces et fonction: les gestes retrouvés. Liège: University of Liège 1993:3–14.
325
Owen LR. Lithic functional analysis as a means of studying gender and material culture in prehistory. Gender and material culture in archaeological perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan 2000:185–205.
326
Prinsloo LC, Wadley L, Lombard M. Infrared reflectance spectroscopy as an analytical technique for the study of residues on stone tools: potential and challenges. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;41:732–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.011
327
Perry L, Sandweiss DH, Piperno DR, et al. Early maize agriculture and interzonal interaction in southern Peru. Nature. 2006;440:76–9. doi: 10.1038/nature04294
328
Piperno, Dolores R. Phytoliths: a comprehensive guide for archaeologists and paleoecologists. Lanham, Md: AltaMira Press 2006.
329
Piperno DR, Holst I. The Presence of Starch Grains on Prehistoric Stone Tools from the Humid Neotropics: Indications of Early Tuber Use and Agriculture in Panama. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1998;25:765–76. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1997.0258
330
Piperno DR, Ranere AJ, Holst I, et al. Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest. Nature. 2000;407:894–7. doi: 10.1038/35038055
331
Revedin A, Aranguren B, Becattini R, et al. Thirty thousand-year-old evidence of plant food processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:18815–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006993107
332
Sajnerova-Duskova A, Fridrichova-Sykorova FJ. Pitted and grinding stones from Middle Palaeolithic settlements in Bohemia: a functional study. Non-flint raw material use in prehistory: old prejudices and new directions = L’utilisation préhistorique de matières premières lithiques alternatives : anciens préjugés, nouvelles perspectives. Oxford: Archaepress 2009:145–51.
333
Levi Sala I. Use wear and post-depositional surface modification: A word of caution. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1986;13:229–44. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(86)90061-0
334
Levi Sala, Irene. A study of microscopic polish on flint implements. Oxford, England: Tempus Reparatum 1996.
335
Delwen Samuel. Investigation of Ancient Egyptian Baking and Brewing Methods by Correlative Microscopy. Science. 1996;273:488–90.
336
Semenov, S. A. Prehistoric technology: an experimental study of the oldest tools and artefacts [sic] from traces of manufacture and wear. Bath, [Avon]: Adams & Dart 1973.
337
Shea JJ, Klenck JD. An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Trampling on the Results of Lithic Microwear Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1993;20:175–94. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1993.1013
338
Kristin D. Sobolik. Lithic Organic Residue Analysis: An Example from the Southwestern Archaic. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1996;23:461–9.
339
Stemp WJ, Lerner HJ, Kristant EH. Quantifying Microwear on Experimental Mistassini Quartzite Scrapers: Preliminary Results of Exploratory Research Using LSCM and Scale-Sensitive Fractal Analysis. Scanning. 2013;35:28–39. doi: 10.1002/sca.21032
340
Stevens NE, Harro DR, Hicklin A. Practical quantitative lithic use-wear analysis using multiple classifiers. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2010;37:2671–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.004
341
Torrence, Robin, Barton, Huw. Ancient starch research. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press 2006.
342
Unger-Hamilton, Romana. Method in microwear analysis: prehistoric sickles and other stone tools from Arjoune, Syria. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports 1988.
343
Van Gijn A. Craft activities in the Dutch Neolithic: a lithic viewpoint. Understanding the Neolithic of north-western Europe. Glasgow: Cruithne Press 1998:328–50.
344
Vaughan, Patrick C. Use-wear analysis of flaked stone tools. Tucson, Ariz: University of Arizona Press 1985.
345
Wadley L, Lombard M. Small things in perspective: the contribution of our blind tests to micro-residue studies on archaeological stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2007;34:1001–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.016
346
Wadley L, Lombard M, Williamson B. The first residue analysis blind tests: results and lessons learnt. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2004;31:1491–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2004.03.010
347
Callahan E. What is experimental archaeology. Primitive technology: a book of earth skills. Salt Lake City, Utah: Gibbs Smith Publisher 1999:4–6.
348
Ferguson, Jeffrey R. Designing experimental research in archaeology: examining technology through production and use. Boulder, Colo: University Press of Colorado 2010.
349
Outram AK. Introduction to experimental archaeology. World Archaeology. 2008;40:1–6. doi: 10.1080/00438240801889456
350
Paardekooper RP. Experimental archaeology. Encyclopedia of archaeology. [Amsterdam?]: ScienceDirect 2008.
351
Reynolds P. The nature of experiment in archaeology. Experiment and design: archaeological studies in honour of John Coles. Oxford: Oxbow Books 1999:156–62.
352
Seetah K. Modern analogy, cultural theory and experimental replication: a merging point at the cutting edge of archaeology. World Archaeology. 2008;40:135–50. doi: 10.1080/00438240701843652
353
Shimada I. Experimental archaeology. Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: Altamira Press 2005:603–42.
354
Tichy R. Presentation of archaeology and archaeological experiment. EuroREA: reconstruction and experimentation in archaeology. 2005;2:113–9.
355
Adams JL. Ground stone use-wear analysis: a review of terminology and experimental methods. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;48:129–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.030
356
Amick DS, Mauldin RP. The potential of experiments in lithic technology. Experiments in lithic technology. Oxford, England: B.A.R 1989:1–14.
357
de la Torre I, Benito-Calvo A, Arroyo A, et al. Experimental protocols for the study of battered stone anvils from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). Journal of Archaeological Science. 2013;40:313–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.007
358
Dibble HL, Pelcin A. The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1995;22:429–39. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1995.0042
359
L. Lewis Johnson, Jeffery A. Behm, François Bordes, Daniel Cahen, Don E. Crabtree, Dena F. Dincauze, Conran A. Hay, Brian Hayden, Thomas R. Hester, Paul R. Katz, Ruthann Knudson, Francis P. McManamon, S. C. Malik, Hansjürgen Müller-Beck, Mark H. Newcomer, K. Paddayya, Patricia Price-Beggerly, Anthony J. Ranere, H. D. Sankalia and Payson D. Sheets. A History of Flint-Knapping Experimentation, 1838-1976 [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 1978;19:337–72.
360
Toth N. The importance of experimental replicative and functional studies in Palaeolithic archaeology. Cultural beginnings: approaches to understanding early hominid life-ways in the African savanna. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt 1991:109–24.
361
Adams JL. Methods for improving ground stone artifact analysis: experiments in mano wear patterns. Experiments in lithic technology. Oxford, England: B.A.R 1989:259–76.
362
Asryan L, Ollé A, Moloney N. Reality and confusion in the recognition of post-depositional alterations and use-wear: an experimental approach on basalt tools. Journal of Lithic Studies. 2014;1. doi: 10.2218/jls.v1i1.815
363
Aubry T, Bradley B, Almeida M, et al. Solutrean laurel leaf production at Maîtreaux: an experimental approach guided by techno-economic analysis. World Archaeology. 2008;40:48–66. doi: 10.1080/00438240701843538
364
Blacking J. Edward Simpson, alias ‘Flint Jack’. A Victorian craftsman. Antiquity. 1953;27:207–11.
365
Bradley B, Sampson CG. Analysis by replication of two Acheulian artefact assemblages. Stone Age prehistory: studies in memory of Charles McBurney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986:29–45.
366
Braun DR, Pobiner BL, Thompson JC. An experimental investigation of cut mark production and stone tool attrition. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2008;35:1216–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.015
367
BYRNE L, OLLÉ A, VERGÈS JM. UNDER THE HAMMER: RESIDUES RESULTING FROM PRODUCTION AND MICROWEAR ON EXPERIMENTAL STONE TOOLS. Archaeometry. 2006;48:549–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00272.x
368
Callahan, Errett. The basics of biface knapping in the eastern fluted point tradition: a manual for flintknappers and lithic analysts. [Bethlehem, Conn.]: Eastern States Archeological Federation 1990.
369
Derndarsky M, Ocklind G. Some Preliminary Observations on Subsurface Damage on Experimental and Archaeological Quartz Tools using CLSM and Dye. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2001;28:1149–58. doi: 10.1006/jasc.2000.0646
370
Diez-Martín F, Yustos P, Domínguez-Rodrigo M, et al. An Experimental Study of Bipolar and Freehand Knapping of Naibor Soit Quartz from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). American Antiquity. 2011;76:690–708. doi: 10.7183/0002-7316.76.4.690
371
Edwards S. A modern knapper’s assessment of the technical skills of the Late Acheulean biface workers at Kalambo Falls. Kalambo Falls prehistoric site: 3: The earlier cultures : middle and earlier Stone Age ; assisted by Julie Cormack and Susan Chin ; with contributions by M. R. Kleindienst ... [et al.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2001:605–11.
372
Jeffrey R. Ferguson. The When, Where, and How of Novices in Craft Production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2008;15:51–67.
373
Nyree Finlay. Blank Concerns: Issues of Skill and Consistency in the Replication of Scottish Later Mesolithic Blades. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory. 2008;15:68–90.
374
Herzlinger G, Pinsky S, Goren-Inbar N. A note on handaxe knapping products and their breakage taphonomy: an experimental view. Journal of Lithic Studies. 2015;2. doi: 10.2218/jls.v2i1.1295
375
Jones PR. Results of experimental work in relation to the stone industries of Olduvai Gorge. Olduvai Gorge: Vol.5: Excavations in Beds III, IV and the Masek Beds, 1968-1971. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. 1994:254–98.
376
Kelterborn P. Towards replicating Egyptian predynastic flint knives. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1984;11:433–53. doi: 10.1016/0305-4403(84)90023-2
377
Machin AJ, Hosfield RT, Mithen SJ. Why are some handaxes symmetrical? Testing the influence of handaxe morphology on butchery effectiveness. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2007;34:883–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.008
378
M. H. Newcomer. Some Quantitative Experiments in Handaxe Manufacture. World Archaeology. 1971;3:85–104.
379
Ollé A, Vergès JM. The use of sequential experiments and SEM in documenting stone tool microwear. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2014;48:60–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2013.10.028
380
Pelegrin J. Remarks about archaeological techniques and methods of knapping: elements of a cognitive approach to stone knapping. Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005:23–33.
381
History of Experimental Archaeology Conference. Experiments past: histories of experimental archaeology. Leiden: Sidestone Press 2014.
382
V. Roux, B. Bril and G. Dietrich. Skills and Learning Difficulties Involved in Stone Knapping: The Case of Stone-Bead Knapping in Khambhat, India. World Archaeology. 1995;27:63–87.
383
Sahnouni M, Schick K, Toth N. An Experimental Investigation into the Nature of Faceted Limestone "Spheroids” in the Early Palaeolithic. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1997;24:701–13. doi: 10.1006/jasc.1996.0152
384
Toth N. Behavioral inferences from Early Stone artifact assemblages: an experimental model. Journal of Human Evolution. 1987;16:763–87. doi: 10.1016/0047-2484(87)90023-6
385
Whittaker, John C. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: University of Texas Press 1994.
