1.
David Rieff. The reproach of hunger: food, justice, and money in the twenty-first century [Internet]. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2015. Available from: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Reproach-Hunger-Justice-Twenty-First-Century/dp/1439123888
2.
Guthman J, ProQuest (Firm). Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism [Electronic resource]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2011.
3.
Goody J. Food and love: a cultural history of East and West [Internet]. London: Verso; 1998. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248654102_Food_and_Love_A_Cultural_History_of_East_and_West
4.
Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2006;3(1). doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-33
5.
The Centre for Genomic Gastronomy. Food Phreaking (Issue 01): A culinary compendium of curious botanical fruit cultivars [Internet]. Available from: http://www.foodphreaking.com/Issue01pdf/FoodPhreaking_01.pdf
6.
The Centre for Genomic Gastronomy. Food Phreaking (Issue 00) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.foodphreaking.com/issue0pdf/Food_Phreaking.pdf
7.
Marina Chang, Lukas Meusburger, editors. Food Junctions Cookbook [Internet]. University College London; 2011. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2011/nov/radically-different-food-junctions-cookbook-now-available
8.
Rieff D. The reproach of hunger: food, justice, and money in the twenty-first century [Internet]. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2015. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303831098_The_reproach_of_hunger_food_justice_and_money_in_the_twenty-first_century_by_David_Rieff
9.
Guthman J, ProQuest (Firm). Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism [Electronic resource]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2011.
10.
Austen K. Environmental science: Pollution patrol. Nature. 2015 Jan 7;517(7533):136–8. doi:10.1038/517136a
11.
Andrea Wiggins, Kevin Crowston. From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences [Internet]. IEEE; 2011. p. 1–10. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5718708/ doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
12.
Barton KS. Colorado’s Millennial Generation: Youth Perceptions and Experiences of Nature. Journal of Geography. 2012 Nov;111(6):213–23. doi:10.1080/00221341.2011.652648
13.
Delgado A, Callen B. Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science. 2016 May 27;179–94. doi:10.1177/0963662516647348
14.
G.A. Sanchez. We Are Biohackers: Exploring the Collective Identity of the DIYbio Movement | TU Delft Repositories [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:2996be4c-8614-4014-8d3a-6b8ff63c8ee6/?collection=research
15.
Keulartz J, van den Belt H. DIY-Bio – economic, epistemological and ethical implications and ambivalences. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. 2016 May 30;12(1). doi:10.1186/s40504-016-0039-1
16.
Sara Ann Wylie, Kirk Jalbert, Shannon Dosemagen, Matt Ratto. Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research. The Information Society. 2014 Mar;30(2):116–26. doi:10.1080/01972243.2014.875783
17.
Ottinger G. Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2010 Mar 1;35(2):244–70. doi:10.1177/0162243909337121
18.
Bäckstrand K. Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics. 2003 Nov;3(4):24–41. doi:10.1162/152638003322757916
19.
Austen K. Out of the lab and onto the streets. New Scientist. 2013 Jun;218(2923):48–51. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(13)61628-0
20.
Alastair Fuad-Luke. Design activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Earthscan; 2009. Available from: https://designopendata.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/designactivism-beautifulstrangenessforasustainableworld_alastairfuadluke.pdf
21.
Sanders EBN, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 2008 Mar;4(1):5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
22.
DiSalvo C, Lodato T, Fries L, Schechter B, Barnwell T. The collective articulation of issues as design practice. CoDesign. 2011 Sep;7(3–4):185–97. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630475
23.
Iversen OS, Halskov K, Leong TW. Rekindling values in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC ’10 [Internet]. ACM Press; 2010. Available from: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1900441.1900455 doi:10.1145/1900441.1900455
24.
Asaro PM. Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies. 2000 Oct;10(4):257–90. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00004-7
25.
Salonen E. Designing Collaboration [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.designingcollaboration.com/Essi_Salonen_DesigningCollaboration.pdf
26.
Give up Activism (Do or Die) [Internet]. Do or Die. p. 160–6. Available from: http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no9/activism.htm
27.
Duncombe S, Lambert S. open! Platform for Art, Culture and the Public Domain [Internet]. 2013. Activist Art: Does it Work? Available from: http://www.onlineopen.org/activist-art-does-it-work
28.
Groys B. e-flux [Internet]. On Art Activism. Available from: http://www.e-flux.com/journal/56/60343/on-art-activism/
29.
Delwiche JF. You eat with your eyes first. Physiology & Behavior. 2012 Nov;107(4):502–4. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.07.007
30.
Perullo N. Taste as Experience: The Philosophy and Aesthetics of Food [Internet]. Columbia University Press; 2016. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.7312/peru17348
31.
Powell M. Which knowledge? Whose reality? An overview of knowledge used in the development sector. Development in Practice [Internet]. 16(6). Available from: http://www.ascleiden.nl/pdf/elecpublconfpowell.pdf
32.
Proposing a fifth generation of knowledge management for development: investigating convergence between knowledge management for development and transdisciplinary research. Knowledge Management for Development Journal [Internet]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267928428_Proposing_a_fifth_generation_of_knowledge_management_for_development_investigating_convergence_between_knowledge_management_for_development_and_transdisciplinary_research
33.
Hale J, Knapp C, Bardwell L, Buchenau M, Marshall J, Sancar F, et al. Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: Gaining insight through the community gardening experience. Social Science & Medicine. 2011 Jun;72(11):1853–63. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.044
34.
Rensten J. The edible city: a year of wild food. London: Boxtree; 2016.
35.
Poe MR, McLain RJ, Emery M, Hurley PT. Urban Forest Justice and the Rights to Wild Foods, Medicines, and Materials in the City. Human Ecology. 2013 Jun;41(3):409–22. doi:10.1007/s10745-013-9572-1
36.
Goldstone RL, Ashpole BC, Roberts M. Knowledge of Resources and Competitors in Human Foraging [Internet]. Available from: http://cognitrn.psych.indiana.edu/rgoldsto/pdfs/foragerknowledge.pdf
37.
Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2006;3(1). doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-33
38.
Adhitya S, Davis B, Frankjaer R, Flanagan P, Mahony Z. The BIOdress. In: Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction - TEI ’16 [Internet]. ACM Press; 2016. p. 627–34. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2839462.2856345 doi:10.1145/2839462.2856345
39.
Barad K. On Touching--The Inhuman That Therefore I Am. differences. 2012 Jan 1;23(3):206–23. doi:10.1215/10407391-1892943
40.
Crossley N. Researching embodiment by way of ‘body techniques’. The Sociological Review. 2007 Mar 20;55:80–94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00694.x
41.
Davidson J, Milligan C. Embodying emotion sensing space: introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography. 2004 Dec;5(4):523–32. doi:10.1080/1464936042000317677
42.
Fourcade M. The Problem of Embodiment in the Sociology of Knowledge: Afterword to the Special Issue on Knowledge in Practice. Qualitative Sociology. 2010 Dec;33(4):569–74. doi:10.1007/s11133-010-9173-x
43.
Tanaka S. Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition. Theory & Psychology. 2015 Aug 1;25(4):455–72. doi:10.1177/0959354315583035
44.
Edwards E, Gosden C, Phillips RB. Sensible objects: colonialism, museums, and material culture [Internet]. English ed. Oxford: Berg; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474215466
45.
Perullo N. Taste as experience: the philosophy and aesthetics of food [Internet]. American edition. New York: Columbia University Press; 2016. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/peru17348
46.
Carless David, Douglas Kitrina. Arts-based research – radical or conventional? | The Psychologist [Internet]. Vol. 29. 29(5):354–7. Available from: https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-29/may-2016/arts-based-research-radical-or-conventional
