[1]
F. De Zulueta and Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius: Vol. 1: Text with critical notes and translation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946.
[2]
W. M. Gordon, O. F. Robinson, and Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[3]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[4]
J. A. C. Thomas, The Institutes of Justinian: text, translation and commentary. Cape Town: Juta, 1975.
[5]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[6]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198848011.001.0001
[7]
O. E. Tellegen-Couperus, A short history of Roman law. London: Routledge, 1993.
[8]
O. F. Robinson, The sources of Roman law: problems and methods for ancient historians, vol. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge, 1997.
[9]
H. F. Jolowicz and B. Nicholas, Historical introduction to the study of Roman law, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
[10]
J. A. Crook, Law and life of Rome. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.
[11]
H. J. Wolff, Roman law: an historical introduction. Norman, Okla: Oklahoma University Press, 1951.
[12]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[13]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[14]
D. Johnston, Roman law in context, vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[16]
‘Tijdschrift voor rechtsgeschiedenis: Revue d’histoire du droit. The Legal history review’ [Online]. Available: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/15718190
[17]
‘Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung’ [Online]. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/zrgr/html
[18]
D. Daube, D. Cohen, and D. Simon, Collected studies in Roman law, vol. Ius commune. Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991.
[19]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Capetown: Juta & Co., Ltd, 1990.
[20]
E. Metzger, ‘Roman Law Resources’. [Online]. Available: http://www.iuscivile.com/
[21]
‘Lex Irnitana’. [Online]. Available: https://www.museosdeandalucia.es/web/museoarqueologicodesevilla/obras-singulares/-/asset_publisher/GRnu6ntjtLfp/content/lex-irnitana
[22]
‘Tony Thomas Roman Law Series Archives’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/events/2019/feb/bonitary-ownership-and-ownership
[23]
P. Birks, ‘Roman Law in Twentieth Century Britain’, in Jurists uprooted: German-speaking émigré lawyers in twentieth-century Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
[24]
W. M. Gordon, O. F. Robinson, and Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[25]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[26]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[27]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198848011.001.0001
[28]
O. E. Tellegen-Couperus, A short history of Roman law. London: Routledge, 1993.
[29]
O. F. Robinson, The sources of Roman law: problems and methods for ancient historians, vol. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge, 1997.
[30]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[31]
H. F. Jolowicz and B. Nicholas, Historical introduction to the study of Roman law, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
[32]
H. J. Wolff, Roman law: an historical introduction. Norman, Okla: Oklahoma University Press, 1951.
[33]
J. A. Crook, Law and life of Rome. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.
[34]
D. Johnston, Roman law in context, vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[35]
P. Birks, ‘English Beginnings and Roman Parallels: Development of common law relating to early Roman Law’, Irish jurist, vol. 6, pp. 147–162, 1971 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c46f169b-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[36]
A. Watson, Law making in the later Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.
[37]
D. Daube, Forms of Roman legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956.
[38]
W. M. Gordon, O. F. Robinson, and Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[39]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[40]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[41]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198848011.001.0001
[42]
O. E. Tellegen-Couperus, A short history of Roman law. London: Routledge, 1993.
[43]
O. F. Robinson, The sources of Roman law: problems and methods for ancient historians, vol. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge, 1997.
[44]
H. F. Jolowicz and B. Nicholas, Historical introduction to the study of Roman law, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
[45]
D. Johnston, Roman law in context, vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[46]
A. Schiller, ‘Senatusconsulta in the Principate’, in An American experience in Roman law: Writings from publications in the United States, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck u. Ruprecht, 1971.
[47]
J. A. Crook, Consilium principis: imperial councils and counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. New York: Arno Press, 1975.
[48]
T. Honoré, Emperors and lawyers, 2nd ed., Completely rev., with A palingenesia of third-Century imperial rescripts, 193-305 A.D. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
[49]
F. Millar, The emperor in the Roman world (31 BC-AD 337), 2nd ed. London: Duckworth, 1992.
[50]
D. Johnston, *Roman law in context, vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[51]
B. W. Frier, The rise of the Roman jurists: studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.
[52]
D. Daube, ‘Hadrian’s rescript to some ex-praetors’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. Ius commune, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991, pp. 345–354.
[53]
Peter Stein, ‘The Two Schools of Jurists in the Early Roman Principate’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 8–31, 1972 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/camblj31&i=18
[54]
A. Watson, Law making in the later Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1974.
[55]
K. Tuori, ‘The ius respondendi and the freedom of Roman jurisprudence’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité: 3e série, vol. 51, pp. 295–337, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f64df69b-32bc-ed11-ac20-0050f2f0d45d
[56]
T. Honoré, Tribonian. London: Duckworth, 1978.
[57]
Honore, A. M., ‘Background to Justinian’s Codification’, Tulane law review, vol. 48, 1973 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tulr48&i=899
[58]
T. Honoré, ‘Some Suggestions for the Study of Interpolations’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 225–249, 1981, doi: 10.1163/157181981X00135.
[59]
David Johnston, ‘Justinian’s Digest: The Interpretation of Interpolation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 149–166, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/764267?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[60]
Simon Corcoran, ‘Justinian and his two codes: revisiting P. Oxy. 1814’, Journal of juristic papyrology, vol. 38, pp. 73–111, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology-r2008-t38/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology-r2008-t38-s73-111/The_Journal_of_Juristic_Papyrology-r2008-t38-s73-111.pdf
[61]
W. M. Gordon, O. F. Robinson, and Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[62]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[63]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198848011.001.0001
[64]
O. E. Tellegen-Couperus, A short history of Roman law. London: Routledge, 1993.
[65]
O. F. Robinson, The sources of Roman law: problems and methods for ancient historians, vol. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge, 1997.
[66]
H. F. Jolowicz and B. Nicholas, Historical introduction to the study of Roman law, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
[67]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[68]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[69]
J. M. Kelly, Roman litigation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.
[70]
J. M. Kelly, Studies in the civil judicature of the Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.
[71]
G. Maccormack, ‘Roman and African Litigation’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 221–255, 1971, doi: 10.1163/157181971X00127.
[72]
Buckland, W. W., ‘Praetor and Chancellor’, Tulane law review, vol. 13, no. 2, 1938 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tulr13&i=213
[73]
W. M. Gordon, O. F. Robinson, and Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[74]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[75]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198848011.001.0001
[76]
O. E. Tellegen-Couperus, A short history of Roman law. London: Routledge, 1993.
[77]
O. F. Robinson, The sources of Roman law: problems and methods for ancient historians, vol. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge, 1997.
[78]
H. F. Jolowicz and B. Nicholas, Historical introduction to the study of Roman law, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
[79]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[80]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[81]
D. Johnston, Roman law in context, vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[82]
P. Birks, ‘From Legis Actio to Formula’, Irish jurist, no. 4, 1969.
[83]
D. Daube, ‘The Peregrine Praetor’, The Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 41, pp. 66–70, 1951 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/298100
[84]
P. Birks, ‘Lucius Veratius and the Lex Aebutia’, in Daube noster: essays in legal history for David Daube, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974.
[85]
P. Birks, ‘New Light on the Roman Legal System: the Appointment of Judges’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 47, no. 01, pp. 36–60, Mar. 1988, doi: 10.1017/S0008197300133719.
[86]
P. Birks, A. Rodger, and J. S. Richardson, ‘Further Aspects of the Tabula Contrebiensis’, Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 74, pp. 45–73, Nov. 1984, doi: 10.2307/299006.
[87]
B. Frier, ‘Chapter 5: The Recuperatores’, in The rise of the Roman jurists: studies in Cicero’s Pro Caecina, vol. Princeton legacy library, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1985, pp. 197–234 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7ztwqp
[88]
J. González, ‘The Lex Irnitana: a New Copy of the Flavian Municipal Law’, Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 76, pp. 147–243, Nov. 1986, doi: 10.2307/300371.
[89]
P. Stein, ‘Equitable’ Remedies for the Protection of Property’, in New perspectives in the Roman law of property: essays for Barry Nicholas, Oxford: Clarendon, 1989, pp. 185–194.
[90]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[91]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[92]
F. Schultz, ‘Classification of actions’, in Classical Roman law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951, pp. 28–49 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6d00596b-4ccd-ed11-8aae-0050f2f06092
[93]
L. Aquilia, ‘Appendix IV’, in Digest IX.2: Lex Aquilia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1928, pp. 89–94 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=608e7576-f2d2-ed11-8aae-0050f2f06092
[94]
D. Liebs, ‘The History of the Roman Condictio’, in The Legal mind: essays for Tony Honoré, Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.
[95]
P. Stein, Regulae iuris: from juristic rules to legal maxims. Edinburgh: University Press, 1966.
[96]
H. F. Jolowicz, ‘The divisions of the law’, in Roman foundations of modern law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957, pp. 61–81 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=11305dc4-42cd-ed11-8aae-0050f2f06092
[97]
P. Stein, ‘Declared law and undeclared law’, in Regulae iuris: from juristic rules to legal maxims, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966, pp. 3–25 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4875a8ce-8d20-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[98]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[99]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[100]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[101]
S. Riccobono, J. Kerr-Wylie, and B. Beinart, Stipulation and the theory of contract. Amsterdam: Balkema, 1957.
[102]
B. Nicholas, ‘The Form of the Stipulation in Roman Law’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 1953.
[103]
G. MacCormack, ‘The oral and the written stipulation in the Institutes’, in Studies in Justinian’s Institutes in memory of J.A.C. Thomas, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983.
[104]
T. Weir, ‘Contracts in Rome and England’, Tulane Law Review, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1615–1648, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tulr66&i=1639
[105]
D. Daube, ‘Sponsor and the History of Contract’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 266–272, 1946.
[106]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[107]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[108]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[109]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[110]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[111]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[112]
J. A. Crook, Law and life of Rome. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.
[113]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[114]
G. Diósdi, Contract in Roman law: from the Twelve Tables to the Glossators. 1981.
[115]
A. Watson, The law of obligations in the later Roman republic. Oxford U.P, 1965.
[116]
D. Daube, ‘Did Macedo murder his father?’, Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Romanistische Abteilung, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 261–311, 1947.
[117]
R. Evans-Jones, ‘The Measure of Damages in the Actio Depositi in Factum’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 267–280, 1987, doi: 10.1163/157181987X00184.
[118]
W. Gordon, ‘Observations on Depositum Irregulare’, in Roman law, Scots law and legal history: selected essays, vol. Edinburgh studies in law, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007, pp. 61–69 [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.3366/j.ctt1r1xs7.10
[119]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[120]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[121]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[122]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[123]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[124]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[125]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[126]
F. De Zulueta, The Roman law of sale. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.
[127]
P. Stein, Fault in the formation of contract in Roman law and Scots law, vol. Aberdeen University studies. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1958.
[128]
T. Honore, ‘Sale and the transfer of ownership : the compilers’ point of view’, in Studies in Justinian’s Institutes in memory of J.A.C. Thomas, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983.
[129]
D. Daube, ‘Certainty of Price’, in Studies in the Roman Law of Sale: dedicated to the memory of Francis de Zulueta, Oxford: Clarendon, 1959.
[130]
J. A. C. Thomas, ‘Celsus: Sale and the passing of property’, in Studies in the Roman Law of Sale: dedicated to the memory of Francis de Zulueta, Oxford: Clarendon, 1959.
[131]
A. Rodger, ‘Concealing a servitude’, in Studies in Justinian’s Institutes in memory of J.A.C. Thomas, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983, pp. 134–150 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cc7ea19c-5636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[132]
A. Rodger, ‘L. Fufius - another undeserving winner?’, in The Legal mind: essays for Tony Honoré, Oxford: Clarendon, 1986, pp. 185–201 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=62478d3d-4d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[133]
A. Watson, ‘“Arra” in the Law of Justinian’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité: 3e série, vol. Series 3, Vol. 6, pp. 385–389, 1959 [Online]. Available: http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/396
[134]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[135]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[136]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[137]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[138]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[139]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[140]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[141]
P. Stein, Fault in the formation of contract in Roman law and Scots law, vol. Aberdeen University studies. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1958.
[142]
J. A. C. Thomas, ‘Gaius and the Gladiators’, in Homenaje al profesor Sánchez del Río y Peguero, vol. Temis : revista de ciencia y técnica jurídicas, [Zaragoza], 1967, pp. 151–156 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8bbf45b5-05c3-ed11-ac20-a04a5e5d2f8d
[143]
A. M. Pritchard, ‘Sale and Hire’, in Studies in the Roman Law of Sale: dedicated to the memory of Francis de Zulueta, Oxford: Clarendon, 1959.
[144]
B. W. Frier, Landlords and tenants in imperial Rome. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7ztrw9
[145]
A. Watson, Contract of mandate in Roman law. Oxford: Clarendon P, 1961.
[146]
G. MacCormack, ‘The Liability of the Mandatary’, Labeo: Rassegna di diritto romano, vol. 18, 1972.
[147]
D. Daube, ‘Societas as Consensual Contract’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 6, no. 03, pp. 381–403, Nov. 1938, doi: 10.1017/S0008197300129289.
[148]
W. Buckland, ‘Aestimatum’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 495–505, 1932 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lqr48&id=509
[149]
D. Daube, ‘Condition Prevented From Materializing’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 271–296, 1958, doi: 10.1163/157181958X00753.
[150]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[151]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[152]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[153]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[154]
Peter B. H. Birks, ‘English and Roman Learning in Moses v. Macferlan’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://clp.oxfordjournals.org/content/37/1/1.full.pdf+html
[155]
P. Birks and G. McLeod, ‘The Implied Contract Theory of Quasi-Contract: Civilian Opinion Current in the Century before Blackstone’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 46–85, 1986, doi: 10.1093/ojls/6.1.46.
[156]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[157]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[158]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[159]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[160]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[161]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[162]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[163]
F. De Zulueta and Justinian, Digest 41, 1 & 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.
[164]
W. Buckland, ‘Contrectatio’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 467–474, 1941 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lqr57&i=477
[165]
A. Watson, ‘Contrectatio as an essential of furtum’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 526–532, 1961 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=57b79da3-88b7-ed11-ac20-0050f2f0d45d
[166]
J. A. C. Thomas, ‘Contrectatio, Complicity and furtum’, Iura: Rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico, vol. 13, 1962.
[167]
A. Watson, ‘Contrectatio again’, Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris, vol. 28, 1962.
[168]
J. A. C. Thomas, ‘Contrectatio - My last word’, Iura: Rivista internazionale di diritto romano e antico, vol. 14, 1963.
[169]
G. MacCormack, ‘Ope Consilio Furtum Factum’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 271–293, 1983, doi: 10.1163/157181983X00115.
[170]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[171]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[172]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[173]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[174]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[175]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[176]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[177]
D. Daube, ‘On the Third Chapter of the Lex Aquilia’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 253–268, 1936 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lqr52&i=265
[178]
D. Daube, ‘On the use of the term damnum’, in Studi in onore di Siro Solozzi nel cinquantesimo anniversario del suo insegnamento universitario, 1899-1948, Napoli: E. Jovene, 1948.
[179]
G. MacCormack, ‘Aquilian culpa’, in Daube noster: essays in legal history for David Daube, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974.
[180]
J. L. Barton, ‘The Lex Aquilia and Decretal Actions’, in Daube noster: essays in legal history for David Daube, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974.
[181]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[182]
D. Daube, ‘Ne quis infamandi causa fiat: The Roman Law of Defamation’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. 1, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991, pp. 1057–1058.
[183]
D. Daube, ‘Collatio 2.6.5’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. 1, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991, pp. 107–122.
[184]
P. B. H. Birks, ‘The Early History of Iniuria’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 163–208, 1969, doi: 10.1163/157181969X00157.
[185]
A. D. E. Lewis, ‘Trespass and Iniuria’, in Anglo-Polish legal essays, vol. Studies on socialist legal systems, Dobbs Ferry, N.Y: Transnational Publishers, 1982, pp. 93–115 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=85832c2f-04c8-ed11-ac20-a04a5e5d2f8d
[186]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[187]
P. B. H. Birks, ‘The Problem of Quasi-Delict’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 164–180, 1969 [Online]. Available: http://clp.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/1/164.full.pdf+html
[188]
W. M. Gordon, ‘The Actio de positis reconsidered’, in Studies in Justinian’s Institutes in memory of J.A.C. Thomas, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983.
[189]
R. Zimmermann, The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.001.0001
[190]
B. Nicholas, ‘Liability for Animals in Roman Law’, Acta juridica, pp. 185–190, 1958 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/actj1958&id=197
[191]
P. Mitchell, ‘Dissimulatio’, in Iniuria and the common law, vol. Hart Studies in Private Law, E. Descheemaeker and H. Scott, Eds. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013, pp. 97–118 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a108ce33-8736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[192]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[193]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[194]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[195]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[196]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[197]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[198]
J. A. Crook, Law and life of Rome. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1967.
[199]
D. Johnston, Roman law in context, vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[200]
A. N. Sherwin-White, The Roman citizenship, 2nd ed., rev.Enl. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
[201]
W. W. Buckland, The Roman law of slavery: the condition of the slave in private law from Augustus to Justinian, vol. Cambridge University Press library editions. London: Cambridge U.P, 1970.
[202]
D. Daube, ‘Two Early Patterns of Manumission’, Journal of Roman Studies, vol. 36, no. 1–2, pp. 57–75, Nov. 1946, doi: 10.2307/298041.
[203]
D. Daube, ‘The lex Fufia Caninia and King Arthur’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. 2, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991, pp. 1083–1086.
[204]
J. Crook, ‘Patria Potestas’, The Classical Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 01, May 1967, doi: 10.1017/S0009838800010363.
[205]
W. K. Lacey, ‘Patria Potestas’, in The family in ancient Rome: new perspectives, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 121–144 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bbdc211a-ce53-ef11-991a-ebf013606e83
[206]
J. M. Kelly, ‘A Note on Threefold Mancipation’, in Daube noster: essays in legal history for David Daube, Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1974, pp. 183–186.
[207]
R. Yaron, ‘Si Pater Filium Ter Venum Duit’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 1968, doi: 10.1163/157181968X00068.
[208]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[209]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[210]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[211]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[212]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[213]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[214]
A. Watson, The law of persons in the later Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.
[215]
P. E. Corbett, The Roman law of marriage. Darmstadt, W. Germany: Scientia Verlag Aalen, 1979.
[216]
S. Treggiari, Roman marriage: iusti coniuges from the time of Cicero to the time of Ulpian. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.
[217]
J. F. Gardner, Women in Roman law & society. London: Croom Helm, 1986.
[218]
J. P. V. D. Balsdon, Roman women: their history and habits. London: Bodley Head, 1962.
[219]
S. E. Looper-Friedman, ‘The Decline of Manus-Marriage in Rome’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 281–296, 1987, doi: 10.1163/157181987X00193.
[220]
A. Lewis, ‘Digest 23.2.6’, in The legal mind: essays for Tony Honoré, Oxford: Clarendon, 1986.
[221]
J. A. Crook, ‘Feminine Inadequacy and the SC Velleianum’, in The family in ancient Rome: new perspectives, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 83–92.
[222]
A. S. Gratwick, ‘Free or Not So Free? Wives and Daughters in the Late Roman Republic’, in Marriage and property, Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1984.
[223]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[224]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[225]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[226]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[227]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[228]
D. Johnston, Roman law in context, vol. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[229]
H. Ankum and E. Pool, ‘Rem in bonis meis esse and rem in bonis meam esse: Traces of the Development of Roman Double Ownership’, in New perspectives in the Roman law of property: essays for Barry Nicholas, Oxford: Clarendon, 1989, pp. 5–41.
[230]
A. Rodger, Owners and neighbours in Roman law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f3028f92-dcc0-ed11-ac20-a04a5e5d2f8d
[231]
G. Diósdi, Ownership in ancient and preclassical Roman law. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, 1970.
[232]
D. Daube, ‘Mancipatio of res nec mancipi in Cicero’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. 2, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991.
[233]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[234]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[235]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[236]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[237]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[238]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[239]
A. Watson, The law of property in the later Roman Republic. Oxford, 1968.
[240]
G. MacCormack, ‘Iusta and Iniusta Possessio’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 71–80, 1974, doi: 10.1163/157181974X00043.
[241]
W. M. Gordon, ‘Acquisition of Ownership by Traditio and Acquisition of Possession’, Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité: 3e série, vol. 12, pp. 279–300, 1965 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a1eb392d-35bc-ed11-ac20-0050f2f0d45d
[242]
W. W. Buckland, ‘The Conception of Usufruct in Classical Law’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 326–348, 1927 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lqr43&id=338
[243]
W. W. Buckland, ‘The Conception of Servitudes in Roman Law’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 426–435, 1928 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/lqr44&id=440
[244]
W. W. Buckland, ‘The Protection of Servitude in Roman Law’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 447–464, 1930 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/lqr46&i=463
[245]
D. Daube, ‘Usufruct and Servitudes’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. 1, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991, pp. 575–578.
[246]
D. Daube, ‘Concerning the classification of interdicts’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. 1, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991, pp. 403–446.
[247]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[248]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[249]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[250]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[251]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[252]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[253]
D. Daube, ‘Doves and Bees’, in Collected studies in Roman law, vol. 2, Frankfurt am Main: V. Klostermann, 1991, pp. 899–914.
[254]
G. McLeod, ‘Wild and Tame Animals and Birds in Roman Law’, in New perspectives in the Roman law of property: essays for Barry Nicholas, Oxford: Clarendon, 1989, pp. 169–176.
[255]
D. Daube, ‘Derelictio, Occupatio and Traditio: Romans and Rabbis’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 77, pp. 382–389, 1961 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=953a09fe-89b7-ed11-ac20-0050f2f0d45d
[256]
A. Tettenborn, ‘Gold Discovered at Heathrow Airport’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 41, no. 02, Nov. 1982, doi: 10.1017/S0008197300108621.
[257]
A. D. E. Lewis, ‘Alluvio: The Meaning of Institutes II.1.20’, in Studies in Justinian’s Institutes in memory of J.A.C. Thomas, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1983, pp. 87–95.
[258]
J. A. C. Thomas, ‘Form and Substance in Roman Law’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 145–167, 1966 [Online]. Available: http://clp.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/145.full.pdf+html
[259]
Alan Rodger, ‘A very good reason for buying a slave woman?’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 123, pp. 446–454, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I98DD96C1155311DCBFDAFE064ED62B3F/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[260]
Gaius, The Institutes of Gaius, vol. Texts in Roman law. London: Duckworth, 1988.
[261]
P. Birks, G. McLeod, and P. Krueger, Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth, 1987.
[262]
B. Nicholas, An introduction to Roman law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.
[263]
P. J. du Plessis and J. A. Borkowski, Borkowski’s textbook on Roman law, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[264]
J. A. C. Thomas, Textbook of Roman law. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co, 1976.
[265]
W. W. Buckland and P. Stein, A text-book of Roman law from Augustus to Justinian, 3rd ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1963.
[266]
A. Watson, ‘Intestate succession’, in The law of succession in the later Roman Republic, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971, pp. 175–187 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=72a01929-31ca-ed11-ac20-a04a5e5d2f8d
[267]
D. Daube, ‘Preponderance of Intestacy at Rome’, Tulane Law Review, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 253–262, 1965 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tulr39&i=289
[268]
D. Johnston, The Roman law of trusts. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198252160.001.0001
