Bibliography for ARCLG107: Technology and Analysis of Archaeological Material: Marcos Martinon-Torres

1
STRAND A - TECHNOLOGY WITHIN SOCIETY .

2
Appadurai, Arjun. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

3
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: : Routledge 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203409060

4
Ewen, Charles Robin. Artifacts. Walnut Creek, CA: : AltaMira Press 2003.

5
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: : Routledge 2007.

6
Jones A. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice. Archaeometry 2004;46:327–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x

7
Kingery, W. D. Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1996.

8
Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.

9
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology Published Online First: 1986. doi:0278-4165(86)90012-7

10
Miller, Heather Margaret-Louise. Archaeological approaches to technology. Amsterdam: : Elsevier/Academic Press 2007.

11
Nanoglou S. Qualities of Humanness: Material Aspects of Greek Neolithic Anthropomorphic Imagery. Journal of Material Culture 2008;13:311–34. doi:10.1177/1359183508095498

12
Olsen, Bjørnar. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.

13
Schiffer, Michael B., Miller, Andrea R. The material life of human beings: artifacts, behavior, and communication. London: : Routledge 1999.

14
Sigaut F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG192_51976

15
Tilley, Christopher Y. Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430

16
Thornton C. Archaeometallurgy. In: Metals and societies: studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway. Bonn: : R. Habelt 2009. 25–33.

17
Boivin, Nicole. Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008.

18
Dant, Tim. Material culture in the social world: values, activities, lifestyles. Buckingham: : Open Univeristy Press 1999.

19
Henare, Amiria J. M., Holbraad, Martin, Wastell, Sari. Thinking through things: theorising artefacts ethnographically. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203088791

20
Lubar, Steven D., Kingery, W. D. History from things: essays on material culture. Washington: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1993.

21
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006.

22
Miller, Daniel. Materiality. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2005.

23
Andrefsky, William. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.

24
Henderson, Julian. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000.

25
Orton, Clive, Hughes, Mike. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

26
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.

27
Schick, Kathy Diane, Toth, Nicholas Patrick. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: : Phoenix 1993.

28
Ingold T. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 2007;14. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002127

29
Kopytoff I. The cultural biology of things: commoditization as a process. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 64–94.http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb32141.0001.001;didno=heb32141.0001.001;node=heb32141.0001.001%3A5.2;view=image;seq=00000079

30
Meskell, Lynn. Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Oxford: : Berg 2004.

31
Meskell L. Introduction, object orientations. In: Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006. 1–17. doi:10.1002/9780470774052.ch1

32
Olsen, Bjørnar. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.

33
Adams WY. Archaeological classification: theory versus practice. Antiquity 1988;56:40–56.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293842480?accountid=14511

34
Michael S. Bisson. Nineteenth Century Tools for Twenty-First Century Archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic Typology of François Bordes Must Be Replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2000;7:1–48.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177411

35
Brian Hayden. Are Emic Types Relevant to Archaeology? Ethnohistory 1984;31:79–92.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/482057

36
Adams, William Yewdale, Adams, Ernest W. Archaeological typology and practical reality: a dialectical approach to artifact classification and sorting. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991.

37
Barrett JC. Bronze Age pottery and the problem of classification. In: Papers on the prehistoric archaeology of Cranborne Chase. Oxford: : Oxbow 1991. 201–30.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=57e50199-1364-e811-80cd-005056af4099

38
Biers, William R. Art, artefacts, and chronology in classical archaeology. London: : Routledge 1992.

39
Lewis R. Binford. Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 1962;28:217–25.http://www.jstor.org/stable/278380

40
Binford LR. Archaeological perspectives. In: New perspectives in archaeology. Chicago: : Aldine 1968. 155–86.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47136.pdf

41
Buck, Caitlin E., Millard, Andrew. Tools for constructing chronologies: crossing disciplinary boundaries. London: : Springer 2004.

42
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: : Routledge 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203409060

43
Carver MOH. Theory and practice in urban pottery seriation. Journal of Archaeological Science 1985;12:353–66. doi:0305-4403(85)90064-0

44
Chapman WR. Arranging ethnology: A.H.L.F. Pitt Rivers and the typological tradition. In: Objects and others : essays on museums and material culture. 1985. 15–48.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG120_47361.pdf

45
Clarke, David L. Analytical archaeologist: collected papers of David L. Clarke. London: : Academic Press 1979.

46
Cumberpatch CG. Towards a phenomenological approach to medieval pottery. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life : current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. 1997. 125–52.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45078.pdf

47
Dunnell RC. Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification. Advances in archaeological method and theory 1986;9:149–207.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20210077

48
Fish PR. Consistency in Archaeological Measurement and Classification: A Pilot Study. American Antiquity 1978;43:86–9.http://www.jstor.org/stable/279635

49
Gräslund, Bo. The birth of prehistoric chronology: dating methods and dating systems in nineteenth-century Scandinavian archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

50
Ian Hodder. The Narrative and Rhetoric of Material Culture Sequences. World Archaeology 1993;25:268–82.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/124819?&Search=yes&searchText=narrative&searchText=sequences&searchText=rhetoric&searchText=culture&searchText=material&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DThe%252Bnarrative%252Band%252Brhetoric%252Bof%252Bmaterial%252Bculture%252Bsequences%2526Search%253DSearch%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=3&ttl=3322&returnArticleService=showFullText

51
Kempton, Willett. The folk classification of ceramics: a study of cognitive prototypes. New York: : Academic Press 1981.

52
Margolis, Eric, Laurence, Stephen. Creations of the mind: theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.

53
Miller D. Artefacts as products of human categorisation processes. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge University Press 1982. 17–25.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45077.pdf

54
Miller, Daniel. Artefacts as categories: a study of ceramic variability in central India. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.

55
Stephen Plog. Analysis of Style in Artifacts. Annual Review of Anthropology 1983;12:125–42.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2155643

56
Stephen Plog and Jeffrey L. Hantman. Chronology Construction and the Study of Prehistoric Culture Change. Journal of Field Archaeology 1990;17:439–56.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/530005

57
Read, Dwight W. Artifact classification: a conceptual and methodological approach. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

58
Prudence M. Rice. Rethinking the Ware Concept. American Antiquity 1976;41:538–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/279024

59
Sackett J. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1982;:59–112. doi:0278-4165(82)90008-3

60
Schnapp A. Between antiquarians and archaeologists--continuities and ruptures. Antiquity 2002;76:134–40.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217579824?accountid=14511

61
Wendrich W. The World According to Basketry. 1999. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6n42w0rg

62
Wheat JB. Ceramic classification: Bradfield and Shepard, types and varieties. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991. 121–31.

63
White JP, Thomas DH. What mean these stones? Ethnotaxonomic models and archaeological interpretations in the New Guinea Highlands. In: Clarke DL, ed. Models in archaeology. 1972. 275–308.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG113_44842.pdf

64
Widemann F. Why is archaeometry so boring for archaeologists? In: Archaeological ceramics : papers presented at a seminar on Ceramics as Archaeological Material held at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. and the National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 29 September-1 October 1980, one of the Smithsonian Institution/National Bureau of Standards seminars on the Application of the Materials and Measurement Sciences to Archaeology and Museum Conservation. Smithsonian Institution Press 1982. 29–36.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47251.pdf

65
Wylie A. The typology debate. In: Thinking from things: essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2002. 42–56.

66
Benco NL. Worked bone tools: Linking metal artisans and animal processors in medieval Islamic Morocco. Antiquity 2002;76:447–57.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217562124?accountid=14511

67
Schlanger N. The chaîne opératoire. In: Archaeology : the key concepts. Routledge 2005. 25–31.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45057.pdf

68
SILLAR B, TITE MS. THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

69
Françoise Audouze. Leroi-Gourhan, a Philosopher of Technique and Evolution. Journal of Archaeological Research 2002;10:277–306.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/41053189

70
Bar‐Yosef O, Van Peer P. The Chaine Operatoire Approach in Middle Paleolithic Archaeology. Current Anthropology 2009;50:103–31. doi:10.1086/592234

71
Dobres M-A. Technology’s links and chaînes : the processual unfolding of technique and technician. In: The social dynamics of technology : practice, politics, and world views. Smithsonian Institution Press 1999. 124–46.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47269.pdf

72
Binford LR. Hunters in a landscape. In: In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. Thames and Hudson 1983. 109–43.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1006_43800.pdf

73
Chanteller C. Lithic technology and the Chaîne Opératoire. In: Prehistoric Britain. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2008. 160–76.

74
Collins MB. Lithic technology as a means of processual inference. In: Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. The Hague: : Mouton 1975. 15–34.

75
Crabtree DE. Comments of lithic technology and experimental archaeology. In: Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. The Hague: : Mouton 1975. 105–13.

76
David N, Kramer C. Studying artifacts: functions, operating sequences, taxonomy. In: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. 138–67. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316036488.007

77
Elizabeth DeMarrais, Luis Jaime Castillo and Timothy Earle. Ideology, Materialization, and Power Strategies. Current Anthropology 1996;37:15–31.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2744153

78
Chris Gosden and Yvonne Marshall. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology 1999;31:169–78.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/125055

79
Holtorf C. Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. Journal of Material Culture 2002;7:49–71. doi:10.1177/1359183502007001305

80
Hoskins, Janet. Biographical objects: how things tell the stories of people’s lives. New York: : Routledge 1998.

81
Hurcombe L. Plant processing for cordage and textiles using serrated flint edges: new chaines operatoires suggested by ethnographic, archaeological and experimental evidence for bast fibre processing. In: Plant processing form a prehistoric and ethnographic perspective =: Préhistoire et ethnographie du travail des plantes : proceedings of a workshop at Ghent University (Belgium) November 28, 2006. Oxford: : John & Erica Hedges 2007. 41–66.

82
Ingold T. `Tools for the Hand, Language for the Face’: An Appreciation of Leroi-Gourhan’s Gesture and Speech. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 1999;30:411–53. doi:10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00022-9

83
Jennings J, Antrobus KL, Atencio SJ, et al. "Drinking Beer in a Blissful Mood” Alcohol Production, Operational Chains, and Feasting in the Ancient World. Current Anthropology 2005;46:275–303. doi:10.1086/427119

84
Lemonnier, Pierre. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Ann Arbor, Mich: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1992.

85
Lucas G. Case study: the life and times of a Roman jar. In: The archaeology of time. London: : Routledge 2005. 95–113.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45056.pdf

86
Meskell, Lynn. Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Oxford: : Berg 2004.

87
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: : Taraxacum 1981.

88
Shanks M. The life of an artefact in an interpretive archaeology. http://documents.stanford.edu/michaelshanks/229

89
Schiffer MB. Behavioral chain analysis: activities, organization and the use of space. In: Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 103–74.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47408.pdf

90
Schlanger N. Mindful technology: unleashing the chaîne opératoire for an archaeology of mind. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 143–51. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598388.015

91
Schlanger N, Silclair A. Technology in the Humanities. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:3–167.

92
Skibo JM, Schiffer MB. Understanding artifact variability and change: a behavioral framework. In: Anthropological perspectives on technology. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 2001. 139–49.

93
Vidale M. Operational sequences beyond linearity. In: Papers from the EAA Third Annual Meeting at Ravenna 1997. Oxford: : Archaeopress 1998. 179–84.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45067.pdf

94
Rapp, George Robert. Archaeomineralogy. 2nd ed. Berlin: : Springer 2009.

95
Ashurst, John, Dimes, Francis G., Honeyborne, D. B. Conservation of building and decorative stone: Vol. 1. London: : Butterworths 1990.

96
Bachmann, H. G. The identification of slags from archaeological sites. London: : Institute of Archaeology 1982.

97
Bayley J, Dungworth D, Paynter S. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines: Archaeometallurgy. English Heritage 2001. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications

98
Leo Biek and Justine Bayley. Glass and other Vitreous Materials. World Archaeology 1979;11:1–25.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124331

99
Freestone, Ian, Gaimster, David R. M. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: : British Museum Press 1997.

100
Gleba, Margarita. Textile production in pre-Roman Italy. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2008.

101
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: : Routledge 2007.

102
Orton, Clive, Hughes, Mike. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

103
Paynter S, Dungworth D. Archaeological Evidence for Glassworking. English Heritage 2011. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/glassworkingguidelines/glassworking-guidelines.pdf

104
Thomson, Roy, Mould, Quita. Leather tanneries: the archaeological evidence. London: : Archetype 2011.

105
Tomber, R., Dore, John, English Heritage, et al. The National Roman Fabric Reference Collection: a handbook. London: : Museum of London Archaeology Service 1998.

106
BGS Rock Classification Scheme - British Geological Survey. http://www.bgs.ac.uk/bgsrcs/

107
Archaeological Geology of Ancient Egypt. http://www.eeescience.utoledo.edu/Faculty/Harrell/Egypt/AGRG_Home.html

108
Utilitarian Stones. 2012.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/77t294df#page-1

109
Building Stones. 2012.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fd124g0?query=building%20stones#page-1

110
Pigments through the Ages - detailed pigment histories, recipes. http://www.webexhibits.org/pigments/

111
Mineralogy Database - Mineral Collecting, Localities, Mineral Photos and Data. http://www.mindat.org/

112
Freestone I. Chapter 4: Pliny on Roman glassmaking. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 77–100.http://www.UCL.eblib.com/patron/Read.aspx?p=677776&pg=1

113
Freestone I, Huges M, Stapleton C. The composition and production of Anglo-Saxon glass. In: Catalogue of Anglo-Saxon glass in the British Museum. London: : British Museum 2008. 29–46.http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/publications/research_publications_series/2008/catalogue_of_anglo_saxon_glass.aspx

114
Paynter S, Dungworth D. Archaeological Evidence for Glassworking. English Heritage 2011. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/glassworkingguidelines/glassworking-guidelines.pdf

115
Price, J., Cottam, Sally. Romano-British glass vessels: a handbook. York: : Council for British Archaeology 1998.

116
Strand EA, Frei KM, Gleba M, et al. Old Textiles -- New Possibilities. European Journal of Archaeology 2010;13:149–73. doi:10.1177/1461957110365513

117
Barber, E. J. W. Prehistoric textiles: the development of cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with special reference to the Aegean. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1991.

118
Jørgensen, Lise Bender. North European textiles until AD 1000. Aarhus: : Aarhus University Press 1992.

119
Gleba, Margarita, Mannering, Ulla. Textiles & textile production in Europe: from prehistory to AD 400. Oxford: : Oxbow 2012.

120
Harris S. Smooth and cool or warm and soft, investigating the properties of cloth in prehistory. | Susanna Harris - Academia.edu. In: Strand A, ed. In North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X. Oxbow Books 2010. http://www.academia.edu/203730/Smooth_and_cool_or_warm_and_soft_investigating_the_properties_of_cloth_in_prehistory

121
Technological examination of Neolithic-Bronze Age pottery from central and southeast Europe and from the Near East. Journal of Archaeological Science Published Online First: 1981. doi:0305-4403(81)90012-1

122
Orton, Clive, Hughes, Mike. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

123
Quinn, Patrick S. Ceramic petrography: the interpretation of archaeological pottery & related artefacts in thin section. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2013.

124
Radivojević M, Rehren T, Pernicka E, et al. On the origins of extractive metallurgy: new evidence from Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010;37:2775–87. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.012

125
Beckmann H. Sophisticated Roman recovery techniques for gold. IAMS Newsletter 1995;19:7–9.http://www.ucl.ac.uk/iams/newsletter/accordion/journals/iams_19/iams_19_1995_bachmann

126
Bachmann, H. G. The identification of slags from archaeological sites. London: : Institute of Archaeology 1982.

127
Bayley J, Dungworth D, Paynter S. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines: Archaeometallurgy. English Heritage 2001. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications

128
Rehren T, Schneider J, Bartels C. Medieval lead-silver smelting in the Siegerland, West Germany. Historical metallurgy: journal of the Historical Metallurgy Society 1999;33.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=922db862-ce64-e811-80cd-005056af4099

129
Wagner D. Introductory orientations: the traditional Chinese iron industry in recent centuries. In: Science and civilisation in China: Volume 5: Chemistry and chemical technology. London: : Cambridge University Press 2008. 5–72.

130
Killick D, Fenn T. Archaeometallurgy: The Study of Preindustrial Mining and Metallurgy. Annual Review of Anthropology 2012;41:559–75.http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145719

131
Andrefsky, William. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.

132
Mesoudi A. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. University of Chicago Press 2011.

133
Schick, Kathy Diane, Toth, Nicholas Patrick. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: : Phoenix 1993.

134
Whittaker, John C. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1994.

135
Benito-Calvo A, de la Torre I. Analysis of orientation patterns in Olduvai Bed I assemblages using GIS techniques: Implications for site formation processes. Journal of Human Evolution 2011;61:50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.011

136
Bevan A. Spatial methods for analysing large-scale artefact inventories. Antiquity 2012;86:492–506.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1021249050?accountid=14511

137
Martinón-Torres M, Li XJ, Bevan A, et al. Making Weapons for the Terracotta Army. Archaeology International 2011;13. doi:10.5334/ai.1316

138
Tilley C, Hamilton S, Harrison S, et al. Nature, Culture, Clitter: Distinguishing Between Cultural and Geomorphological Landscapes; The Case of Hilltop Tors in South-West England. Journal of Material Culture 2000;5:197–224. doi:10.1177/135918350000500204

139
Blankholm, H. P. Intrasite spatial analysis in theory and practice. Aarhus: : Aarhus University Press 1991.

140
BRUGHMANS T. CONNECTING THE DOTS: TOWARDS ARCHAEOLOGICAL NETWORK ANALYSIS. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2010;29:277–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2010.00349.x

141
Hietala, Harold J. Intrasite spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1984.

142
Hodder, Ian, Orton, Clive. Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1976.

143
Katsianis M, Tsipidis S, Kotsakis K, et al. A 3D digital workflow for archaeological intra-site research using GIS. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:655–67. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.002

144
Kroll, Ellen M., Price, T. Douglas, Society for American Archaeology. The interpretation of archaeological spatial patterning. New York: : Plenum Press 1991.

145
Livingood PC, Cordell AS. Point/counter point: the accuracy and feasibility of digital image techniques in the analysis of ceramic thin sections. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:867–72. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.015

146
Vanzetti et al. A. The iceman as a burial. Antiquity 2010;84:681–92.http://search.proquest.com/docview/755013317?accountid=14511

147
Cathy Lynne Costin. Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:1–56.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20170212

148
Peacock DP. Towards a model for Roman pottery studies. In: Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London: : Longman 1982. 6–11.

149
Katherine A. Spielmann. Feasting, Craft Specialization, and the Ritual Mode of Production in Small-Scale Societies. American Anthropologist 2002;104:195–207.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/683770

150
M. James Blackman, Gil J. Stein and Pamela B. Vandiver. The Standardization Hypothesis and Ceramic Mass Production: Technological, Compositional, and Metric Indexes of Craft Specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria. American Antiquity 1993;58:60–80.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/281454

151
Burri E. Production and use: temper as a marker of domestic production in the case of two middle Neolithic villages in Concise. In: Archaeometric and archaeological approaches to ceramics: papers presented at EMAC ’05, 8th European meeting on ancient ceramics, Lyon 2005. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2007. 33–9.

152
Castanzo RA. Ceramics on the Side: Pottery Making as an Augmentation of Household Economy in the Valley of Puebla during the Formative Period. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 2009;19:133–47. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2009.01017.x

153
Cathy Lynne Costin. The Use of Ethnoarchaeology for the Archaeological Study of Ceramic Production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2000;7:377–403.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177427

154
Freestone I. Glass production in Late Antiquity and the Early Islamic period: a geochemical perspective. Geomaterials in cultural heritage 2006;:201–16.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_59941.pdf

155
Freestone I. Pliny on Roman glassmaking. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 77–100.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_59937.pdf

156
Freestone I, Price J, Cartwright C. The batch: its recognition and significance. In: Annales du 17e Congrès de l’Association Internationale pour l’Histoire du Verre, Anvers, 2006 =: Annales of the 17th Congress of the International Association for the History of Glass, 2006, Antwerp. Antwerp: : University Press Antwerp 2009. 130–5.http://www.academia.edu/3122507/The_Batch_and_its_Significance

157
Freestone, Ian, Gaimster, David R. M. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: : British Museum Press 1997.

158
Haines HR, Feinman GM, Nicholas LM. HOUSEHOLD ECONOMIC SPECIALIZATION AND SOCIAL DIFFERENTIATION: The stone-tool assemblage at El Palmillo, Oaxaca. Ancient Mesoamerica 2004;15:251–66. doi:10.1017/S0956536104040155

159
Henderson J, McLoughlin SD, McPhail DS. Radical changes in Islamic glass technology: evidence for conservatism and experimentation with new glass recipes from early and middle Islamic Raqqa, Syria. Archaeometry 2004;46:439–68. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00167.x

160
Henderson et al. J. Experiment and innovation: early Islamic industry at al-Raqqa, Syria. Antiquity 2005;79:130–45.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=505112931&site=ehost-live&scope=site

161
Hodder, Ian, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005.

162
Humphris J, Martinón-Torres M, Rehren T, et al. Variability in single smelting episodes – a pilot study using iron slag from Uganda. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:359–69. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.020

163
Martinón-Torres M, Li XJ, Bevan A, et al. Forty Thousand Arms for a Single Emperor: From Chemical Data to the Labor Organization Behind the Bronze Arrows of the Terracotta Army. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Published Online First: 2012. doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9158-z

164
Peacock, D. P. S., University of Southampton. Rome in the desert: a symbol of power. Southampton: : University of Southampton 1992.

165
Poblome J, Degryse P, Viaene W, et al. The Concept of a Pottery Production Centre. An Archaeometrical Contribution from Ancient Sagalassos. Journal of Archaeological Science 2002;29:873–82. doi:10.1006/jasc.2001.0756

166
Rehren T, Pusch E, Herold A. Glass coloring works within a copper-centered industrial complex in Late Bronze Age Egypt. In: The prehistory & history of glassmaking technology. Westerville, OH: : American Ceramic Society 1998. 227–50.http://www.academia.edu/1082340/Glass_coloring_works_within_a_copper-centered_industrial_complex_in_Late_Bronze_Age_Egypt

167
Rehren T, Pusch E, Herold A. Qantir-Piramesses and the organisation of the Egyptian glass industry. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001. 223–38.

168
Rehren T, Martinon-Torres M. Naturam ars imitata: European brassmaking between craft and science. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 167–88.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG108_46356.pdf

169
Prudence M. Rice, William Y. Adams, Joseph W. Ball, Whitney M. Davis, Timothy Earle, Robert E. Fry, Ian Hodder, L. R. V. Joesink-Mandeville, Charles C. Kolb, Masae Nishimura, Yasushi Kojo, Miguel Rivera Dorado, Barbara L. Stark and Sander E. Van Der Leeuw. Evolution of Specialized Pottery Production: A Trial Model [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 1981;22:219–40.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2742199

170
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:165–202.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/41053131

171
Prudence M. Rice. Late Classic Maya Pottery Production: Review and Synthesis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2009;16:117–56.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/25653117

172
Valentine Roux. Ceramic Standardization and Intensity of Production: Quantifying Degrees of Specialization. American Antiquity 2003;68:768–82. doi:10.2307/3557072

173
Shennan S. Cost, benefit and value in the organization of early European copper production. Antiquity 1999;73:352–63.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9434845&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0003598X0008830X

174
Shortland AJ. The Number, Extent and Distribution of the Vitreous Materials Workshops at Amarna. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2000;19:115–34. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00104

175
Shortland A, Nicholson P, Jackson C. Glass and faience at Amarna: different methods of both supply for production and subsequent distribution. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001.

176
Beck ME. Midden Ceramic Assemblage Formation: A Case Study from Kalinga, Philippines. American Antiquity 2006;71:27–51.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035320

177
Hardy-Smith T, Edwards PC. The Garbage Crisis in prehistory: artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2004;23:253–89. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2004.05.001

178
Schiffer MB. Chapter 1: The nature of archaeological evidence: Chapter 2: The dimensions of artifact variability. In: Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987. 3–23.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_69460.pdf

179
Needham, Stuart, Spence, Tony, Serjeantson, D., et al. Refuse and disposal at Area 16 East, Runnymede. London: : Trustees of the British Museum 1996.

180
Lewis R. Binford. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research 1981;37:195–208.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3629723?&Search=yes&searchText=archaeology&searchText=Behavioral&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DBehavioral%252Barchaeology%252Band%252Bthe%2526Search%253DSearch%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=17&ttl=9941&returnArticleService=showFullText

181
Richard Bradley. The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory. Man 1982;17:108–22.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104

182
Carmen J. Commodities, rubbish and treasure: valuing archaeological objects. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:195–207.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47259.pdf

183
Chapman, John. Fragmentation in archaeology: people, places, and broken objects in the prehistory of south-eastern Europe. London: : Routledge 2000.

184
Chapman, John, Gaydarska, Bisserka. Parts and wholes: fragmentation in prehistoric context. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2007.

185
Deal M. Household pottery disposal in the Maya highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1985;:243–91. doi:0278-4165(85)90008-X

186
Deal M, Hagstrum MB. Ceramic reuse behavior among the Maya and Wanka: implications for archaeology. In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 111–25.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG112_45626.pdf

187
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;:117–63. doi:0278-4165(83)90010-7

188
Hill, J. D. Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: : Tempus Reparatum 1995.

189
Hutson SR, Stanton TW. Cultural Logic and Practical Reason: the Structure of Discard in Ancient Maya Houselots. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2007;17. doi:10.1017/S0959774307000212

190
Charles H. LeeDecker. Discard Behavior on Domestic Historic Sites: Evaluation of Contexts for the Interpretation of Household Consumption Patterns. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1994;1:345–75.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177317

191
Martin L, Russell N. Trashing rubbish. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000. 57–69.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42230.pdf

192
Moore, Henrietta L. Space, text, and gender: an anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya. New York: : Guilford Press 1996.

193
Olivier L. The Hochdorf ‘princely’ grave and the question of the nature of archaeological funerary assemblages. In: Time and archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 109–38.

194
Patrik L. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in archaeological method and theory 1985;8:27–62.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170186

195
Pounds, Norman John Greville. Hearth & home: a history of material culture. Bloomington, [Ind.]: : Indiana University Press 1989.

196
Michael B. Schiffer. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity 1972;37:156–65.http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203

197
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987.

198
Schofield, A. J., Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Interpreting artefact scatters: contributions to ploughzone archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 1991.

199
Michael J. Shott. Status and Role of Formation Theory in Contemporary Archaeological Practice. Journal of Archaeological Research 1998;6:299–329.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053161

200
Sommer U. Dirt theory, or archaeological sites seen as rubbish heaps. Journal of theoretical archaeology 1990;1:47–60.

201
Staski, Edward, Sutro, Livingston D. The ethnoarchaeology of refuse disposal. [Tempe, Ariz.]: : Arizona State University 1991.

202
Thompson, M. Rubbish theory: the creation and destruction of value. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1979.

203
Walker W. Ceremonial trash? In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 67–79.http://www.academia.edu/2519493/Ceremonial_Trash

204
Wilson DC. Identification and assessment of secondary refuse aggregates. Journal of archaeological method and theory 1994;1:41–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177304

205
Woodward A. Beads and beakers: Heirlooms and relics in the British Early Bronze Age. Antiquity 2002;76:1040–7.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217553487/140B1C511961F1AEDFE/1?accountid=14511

206
Chris Gosden. What Do Objects Want? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2005;12:193–211.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177516

207
Jones A. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice. Archaeometry 2004;46:327–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x

208
Renfrew C. Towards a theory of material engagement. In: Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2004. 23–31.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45081.pdf

209
Buchli V. Material culture: current problems. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2004. 179–94.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45076.pdf

210
Chilton, Elizabeth S. Material meanings: critical approaches to the interpretation of material culture. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1999.

211
Cole, Michael. Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1996.

212
DeAtley SP, Bishop RL. Toward an integrated interface for archaeology and archaeometry. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991. 358–81.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d6a7df24-c164-e811-80cd-005056af4099

213
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers 2000.

214
Dobres M-A, Hoffman CR. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of archaeological method and theory 1994;1:211–58.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47158.pdf

215
Dobres, Marcia-Anne, Hoffman, Christopher R. The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1999.

216
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: : Vintage Books 1995.

217
Alfred Gell. Technology and Magic. Anthropology Today 1988;4:6–9.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3033230

218
Gell, Alfred. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998.

219
Olivier P. Gosselain. Technology and Style: Potters and Pottery Among Bafia of Cameroon. Man 1992;27:559–86.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2803929

220
Hodder I. Neo-thingness. In: Explaining social change: studies in honour of Colin Renfrew. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2004. 45–52.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45075.pdf

221
Hosler, Dorothy. The sounds and colors of power: the sacred metallurgical technology of ancient West Mexico. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1994.

222
Ingold T. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 2007;14. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002127

223
Jones, Andrew. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.

224
Jones, Andrew. Memory and material culture. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.

225
Lechtman H. Style in technology - some early thoughts. In: Material culture: styles, organization, and dynamics of technology. St. Paul: : West Pub. Co 1977. 3–20.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47265.pdf

226
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology Published Online First: 1986. doi:0278-4165(86)90012-7

227
Lemonnier, Pierre. Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: : Routledge 1993.

228
Lemonnier, Pierre. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Ann Arbor, Mich: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1992.

229
Andrew Martin. Agents in Inter-Action: Bruno Latour and Agency. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2005;12:283–311.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177522

230
Mauss M. Body techniques. In: Sociology and psychology: essays. London [etc.]: : Routledge and Kegan Paul 1979. 97–135.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG120_47365.pdf

231
Miller D. Artefacts and the meaning of things. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.

232
Morphy H. Art as a mode of action. Some problems with Gell’s art and agency. Journal of material culture 2009;14:5–27.http://www.swetswise.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/FullTextProxy/swproxy?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmcu.sagepub.com%2Fcgi%2Freprint%2F14%2F1%2F5.pdf%3Fxdata%3D144082108120&ts=1380019139412&cs=1823710415&userName=8080038.ipdirect&emCondId=3344&articleID=39955852&yevoID=2440547&titleID=113641&remoteAddr=144.82.108.120&hostType=PRO

233
Nanoglu S. Regional perspectives on the Neolithic anthropomorphic imagery of Northern Greece. Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 2006;19:155–76.https://www-equinoxpub-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/journals/index.php/JMA/article/view/3188/2071

234
Bryan Pfaffenberger. Fetishised Objects and Humanised Nature: Towards an Anthropology of Technology. Man 1988;23:236–52.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2802804

235
Bryan Pfaffenberger. Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992;21:491–516.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2155997

236
Schiffer, Michael B., Miller, Andrea R. The material life of human beings: artifacts, behavior, and communication. London: : Routledge 1999.

237
Schiffer, Michael B. Anthropological perspectives on technology. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 2001.

238
Sigaut F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG192_51976

239
Mauss, Marcel, Schlanger, Nathan. Techniques, technology and civilisation. New York: : Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books 2006.

240
SILLAR B, TITE MS. THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

241
Sillar B. The Social Agency of Things? Animism and Materiality in the Andes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2009;19. doi:10.1017/S0959774309000559

242
Appadurai A. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 3–63. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819582.003

243
Earle T. Exchange systems in prehistory. In: Trade and exchange: archaeological studies from history and prehistory. New York: : Springer 2010. 205–17. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1072-1_13

244
Renfrew C. Trade as action at a distance. In: Ancient civilization and trade. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 1975. 3–59.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1007_49263.pdf

245
Sahlins M. On the sociology of primitive exchange. In: Stone Age economics. London: : Routledge 1974. 185–275.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_69459.pdf

246
Hughes M. Tracing to source. In: Science and the past. London: : British Museum Press 1991.

247
Wilson L, Pollard AM. The provenance hypothesis. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001. 507–17.

248
Tykot RH. Archaeological provenance studies. In: Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004. 407–32.

249
Appadurai A. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 3–63.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47283.pdf

250
Dillian, Carolyn D., White, Carolyn L. Trade and exchange: archaeological studies from history and prehistory. New York: : Springer 2010.

251
Minc LD. Monitoring regional market systems in prehistory: Models, methods, and metrics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2006;25:82–116. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.09.003

252
Perlès C. Systems of exchange and organization of production in Neolithic Greece. Journal of mediterranean archaeology 1988;5:115–64.

253
Renfrew C. Trade as action at a distance. In: Ancient civilization and trade. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 1975. 3–59.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL1007_49263.pdf

254
Sahlins, Marshall David. Stone Age economics. London: : Routledge 2004.

255
Crump, Thomas. The phenomenon of money. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1981.

256
George Dalton. Theoretical Issues in Economic Anthropology. Current Anthropology 1969;10:63–102.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2740685?&Search=yes&searchText=anthropology&searchText=issues&searchText=Theoretical&searchText=economic&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DTheoretical%252Bissues%252Bin%252Beconomic%252Banthropology%2526acc%253Don%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff&prevSearch=&item=6&ttl=42299&returnArticleService=showFullText

257
John H. Dowling. The Goodfellows vs. the Dalton Gang: The Assumptions of Economic Anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 1979;35:292–308.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629904

258
Earle T. Production and exchange in prehistory. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 608–35.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45082.pdf

259
C. A. Gregory. Gifts to Men and Gifts to God: Gift Exchange and Capital Accumulation in Contemporary Papua. Man 1980;15:626–52.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2801537

260
Gregory CA. Exchange and reciprocity. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 911–33.

261
Mauss, Marcel. The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: : Routledge 2002.

262
Polanyi, Karl. Trade and market in the early empires: economies in history and theory. Glencoe, Ill: : Free Press

263
Monica L. Smith. The Role of Ordinary Goods in Premodern Exchange. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1999;6:109–35.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177399

264
Weiner, Annette B. Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1992.

265
Adams NK. Political affinities and economic fluctuations: the evidence from textiles. In: Ancient textiles: production, craft and society : proceedings of the First International Conference on Ancient Textiles, held at Lund, Sweden, and Copenhagen, Denmark, on March 19-23, 2003. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2007. 201–7.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47270.pdf

266
Bamforth DB, Woodman PC. Tool hoards and Neolithic use of the landscape in north-eastern Ireland. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2004;23:21–44. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2004.00200.x

267
Barrett JC, Needham SP. Production, circulation and exchange: problems in the interpretation of Bronze Age bronzework. In: The Archaeology of context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends. Sheffield: : Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield 1988. 127–40.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45069.pdf

268
Bell C. Wheels within wheels? A view of Mycenaean trade from the Levantine emporia. In: Emporia: Aegeans in the central and eastern Mediterranean : proceedings of the 10th International Aegean Conference/10e Rencontre égéenne internationale, Athens, Italian School of Archaeology, 14-18 April 2004. Liège: : Université de Liège, Histoire de l’art et archéologie de la Grèce antique 2005. 363–70.

269
Bradley, Richard, Edmonds, M. R. Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.

270
Clough, T. H. McK., Cummins, W. A. Stone axe studies: Volume 2: The petrology of prehistoric stone implements from the British Isles. London: : Council for British Archaeology 1988.

271
Cooney, Gabriel, Mandal, Stephen, Byrnes, Emmet, et al. The Irish Stone Axe Project: Monograph I. Bray: : Wordwell 1998.

272
Cochrane EE, Neff H. Investigating compositional diversity among Fijian ceramics with laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): implications for interaction studies on geologically similar islands. Journal of Archaeological Science 2006;33:378–90. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.003

273
Crawford, Michael H. Coinage and money under the Roman Republic: Italy and the Mediterranean economy. London: : Methuen 1985.

274
Creighton, John. Coins and power in late Iron Age Britain. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.

275
Dietler M. Rituals of commensality and the politics of state formation in the ‘Princely’ societies of Early Iron Age Europe. In: Les princes de la protohistoire et l’émergence de l’Etat: actes de la table ronde internationale organisée par le Centre Jean Bérard et l’Ecole française de Rome, Naples, 27-29 octobre 1994. Naples: : Centre J. Bérard 1999. 135–52.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_59937.pdf

276
Dietler, Michael. Archaeologies of colonialism: consumption, entanglement, and violence in ancient Mediterranean France. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2010.

277
Edmonds, M. R. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: : Routledge 1995.

278
Frankenstein S, Rowlands M. The Internal Structure and regional Context of Early Iron Age Society in South-Western Germany. In: Social transformations in archaeology: global and local perspectives. London: : Routledge 1998.

279
Philip Grierson. Commerce in the Dark Ages: A Critique of the Evidence. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 1959;9:123–40.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3678808

280
Kenneth G. Hirth. Political Economy and Archaeology: Perspectives on Exchange and Production. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:203–39.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053132

281
Ian Hodder. Regression Analysis of Some Trade and Marketing Patterns. World Archaeology 1974;6:172–89.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124001

282
Hodder, Ian, Orton, Clive. Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1976.

283
Christopher Howgego. The Supply and Use of Money in the Roman World 200 B.C. to A.D. 300. The Journal of Roman Studies 1992;82:1–31.http://www.jstor.org/stable/301282

284
Lo Cascio E. How did the Romans view their coinage and its function? In: Coin finds and coin use in the Roman world: the thirteenth Oxford Symposium on Coinage and Monetary History, 25.-27.3.1993 : a NATO advanced research workshop. Berlin: : Gebr. Mann Verlag 1996. 273–87.

285
Minc LD. Monitoring regional market systems in prehistory: Models, methods, and metrics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2006;25:82–116. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.09.003

286
Needham S. Displacement and exchange in archaeological methodology. In: Trade and exchange in prehistoric Europe: proceedings of a conference held at the University of Bristol, April 1992. Oxford: : published by Oxbow Books in association with the Prehistoric Society and the Société préhistorique française 1993. 161–9.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d834d987-1564-e811-80cd-005056af4099

287
Parkinson WA. Tribal boundaries: Stylistic variability and social boundary maintenance during the transition to the Copper Age on the Great Hungarian Plain. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2006;25:33–58. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.06.002

288
Peacock, D. P. S., Williams, D. F. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. London: : Longman 1986.

289
Perlés C. Systems of exchange and organization of production in Neolithic Greece. Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 1992;5:115–64.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47267.pdf

290
Stein GJ, Hollander D, Schwartz M. Reconstructing Mesopotamian Exchange Networks in the 4th Millennium BC : Geochemical and Archaeological Analyses of Bitumen Artifacts from Hacinebi Tepe, Turkey. Paléorient 1999;25:67–82. doi:10.3406/paleo.1999.989

291
Shennan S. Commodities, transactions and growth in the Central European Early Bronze Age. European journal of archaeology 1993;1:59–72.http://metalib.ucl.ac.uk:9003/sfx_local?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:opac_856&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017837284&svc_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:sch_svc&

292
Sherratt S. Eppur si muove: Pots, markets, and values in the second-millennium Mediterranean. In: The complex past of pottery: production, circulation and consumption of Mycenaean and Greek pottery (sixteenth to early fifth centuries BC) : proceedings of the ARCHON international conference, held in Amsterdam, 8-9 November 1996. Amsterdam: : J.C. Gieben 1999. 163–211.

293
Sherratt AG, Sherratt ES. From luxuries to commodities: The nature of Mediterranean Bronze Age trading systems. In: Bronze age trade in the Mediterranean: papers presented at the Conference held at Rewley House, Oxford, in December 1989. Jonsered: : Åstrom 1991. 351–86.

294
Sillar B. Reputable pots and disreputable potters: Individual and community choice in present-day pottery production and exchange in the Andes. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 1–20.

295
Van Der Leuw S. Some notes from the potter’s point of view. In: The complex past of pottery: production, circulation and consumption of Mycenaean and Greek pottery (sixteenth to early fifth centuries BC) : proceedings of the ARCHON international conference, held in Amsterdam, 8-9 November 1996. Amsterdam: : J.C. Gieben 1999. 115–32.

296
Woolf G. World-systems analysis and the Roman empire. Journal of Roman archaeology 1999;3:44–58.http://berlinarchaeology.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/woolf-1990.pdf

297
Flintsource.Net. http://www.flintsource.net/

298
IAOS World Obsidian Source Catalog. http://www.obsidianlab.com/sourcecatalog/s_home.html

299
FREUND KP. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF OBSIDIAN SOURCING STUDIES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH. Archaeometry 2013;55:779–93. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00708.x

300
Gratuze B. Obsidian Characterization by Laser Ablation ICP-MS and its Application to Prehistoric Trade in the Mediterranean and the Near East: Sources and Distribution of Obsidian within the Aegean and Anatolia. Journal of Archaeological Science 1999;26:869–81. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0459

301
Herz N. Sourcing lithic artefacts by instrumental analysis. In: Earth sciences and archaeology. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2001. 449–72.

302
Huckell BB, Kilby JD, Boulanger MT, et al. Sentinel Butte: neutron activation analysis of White River Group chert from a primary source and artifacts from a Clovis cache in North Dakota, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science 2011;38:965–76. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.11.011

303
Maniatis Y. Scientific techniques and methodologies for the provenance of white marble. In: Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004. 179–202.

304
Renfrew C, Dixon JE, Cann JR. Obsidian and early cultural contact in the Near East. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1966;32:30–72. doi:10.1017/S0079497X0001433X

305
Pollard, A. M., Heron, Carl, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2008.

306
Michael E. Smith, Adrian L. Burke, Timothy S. Hare and Michael D. Glascock. Sources of Imported Obsidian at Postclassic Sites in the Yautepec Valley, Morelos: A Characterization Study Using XRF and INAA. Latin American Antiquity 2007;18:429–50.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25478196

307
Thorpe RS. The geological sources and transport of the bluestones of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, U.K. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1991;:103–57.

308
Blomster JP. Olmec Pottery Production and Export in Ancient Mexico Determined Through Elemental Analysis. Science 2005;307:1068–72. doi:10.1126/science.1107599

309
Day PM, Kiriatzi E, Tsolakidou A, et al. Group Therapy in Crete: A Comparison Between Analyses by NAA and Thin Section Petrography of Early Minoan Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Science 1999;26:1025–36. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0424

310
Patrick E. McGovern, Thomas L. Sever, J. Wilson Myers, Eleanor Emlen Myers, Bruce Bevan, Naomi F. Miller, S. Bottema, Hitomi Hongo, Richard H. Meadow, Peter Ian Kuniholm, S. G. E. Bowman, M. N. Leese, R. E. M. Hedges, Frederick R. Matson, Ian C. Freestone, Sarah J. Vaughan, Julian Henderson, Pamela B. Vandiver, Charles S. Tumosa, Curt W. Beck, Patricia Smith, A. M. Child, A. M. Pollard, Ingolf Thuesen and Catherine Sease. Science in Archaeology: A Review. American Journal of Archaeology 1995;99:79–142.http://www.jstor.org/stable/506880

311
Morris EL, Woodward A. Ceramic petrology and prehistoric pottery in the UK. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 2003;69:279–304. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00001353

312
Peacock DPS. Neolithic pottery production in Cornwall. Antiquity 1969;43:145–9.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293745764?accountid=14511

313
Gale NH. A response to the paper of A. M. Pollard. In: From mine to microscope: advances in the study of ancient technology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009. 191–6.

314
Gale NH, Stos-Gale Z. Lead isotope analyses applied to provenance studies. In: Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000. 503–84.

315
GUERRA MF, CALLIGARO T, PEREA A. THE TREASURE OF GUARRAZAR: TRACING THE GOLD SUPPLIES IN THE VISIGOTHIC IBERIAN PENINSULA. Archaeometry 2007;49:53–74. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00287.x

316
Krause, Rüdiger. Studien zur kupfer- und frühbronzezeitlichen Metallurgie zwischen Karpatenbecken und Ostsee. Rahden/Westf: : Leidorf 2003.

317
Pernicka E. Archaeometallurgy: examples of the application of scientific methods to the provenance of archaeological metal objects. In: Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004. 309–29.

318
Pollard AM. What a long, strange Trip it’s been: lead Isotopes and Archaeology. In: From mine to microscope: advances in the study of ancient technology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009. 181–9.

319
Stos-Gale Z. Across the wine dark seas…. sailor tinkers and royal cargoes in the late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean. In: From mine to microscope: advances in the study of ancient technology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009. 163–80.

320
Calligaro T, Dran J-C, Poirot J-P, et al. PIXE/PIGE characterisation of emeralds using an external micro-beam. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 2000;161–163:769–74. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00974-X

321
Calligaro T, Colinart S, Poirot J-P, et al. Combined external-beam PIXE and μ-Raman characterisation of garnets used in Merovingian jewellery. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 2002;189:320–7. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(01)01078-3

322
Gratuze B, Janssens K. Provenance analysis of glass artefacts. In: Non-destructive microanalysis of cultural heritage materials. Amsterdam, London: : Elsevier 2004. 663–712.

323
Popelka-Filcoff RS, Miksa EJ, Robertson JD, et al. Elemental analysis and characterization of ochre sources from Southern Arizona. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:752–62. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.05.018

324
Robertshaw P, Wood M, Melchiorre E, et al. Southern African glass beads: chemistry, glass sources and patterns of trade. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010;37:1898–912. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.016

325
Stein GJ, Hollander D, Schwartz M. Reconstructing Mesopotamian Exchange Networks in the 4th Millennium BC : Geochemical and Archaeological Analyses of Bitumen Artifacts from Hacinebi Tepe, Turkey. Paléorient 1999;25:67–82. doi:10.3406/paleo.1999.989

326
Weigand PC. Turquoise sources and source analysis: Mesoamerica and the southwestern USA. In: Exchange systems in prehistory. New York: : Academic Press 1977. 15–34.

327
Eerkens JW, Lipo CP. Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2005;24:316–34. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.08.001

328
Brian Hayden. Practical and Prestige Technologies: The Evolution of Material Systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1998;5:1–55.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177377

329
David Wengrow. The Evolution of Simplicity: Aesthetic Labour and Social Change in the Neolithic Near East. World Archaeology 2001;33:168–88.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/827897

330
Bailey GN. Concepts, time-scales and explanations in economic prehistory. In: Economic archaeology: towards an integration of ecological and social approaches. Oxford: : B.A.R. 1981. 97–117.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45090.pdf

331
Barnett, William, Hoopes, John W. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Washington [D.C.]: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1995.

332
Basalla, George. The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press 1988.

333
Bayley J. Innovation in later medieval urban metalworking. Historical metallurgy: journal of the Historical Metallurgy Society 1996;30:67–71.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45091.pdf

334
Blackman MJ, Stein GJ, Vandiver PB. The Standardization Hypothesis and Ceramic Mass Production: Technological, Compositional, and Metric Indexes of Craft Specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria. American Antiquity 1993;58:60–80.http://www.jstor.org/stable/281454

335
Charlton MF, Crew P, Rehren T, et al. Explaining the evolution of ironmaking recipes – An example from northwest Wales. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2010;29:352–67. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.05.001

336
Costin C. The impact of the Inca conquest on local technology in the Upper Mantaro Valley, Peru. In: What’s new?: a closer look at the process of innovation. London: : Unwin Hyman 1989. 107–39.

337
Crossley D. The English glassmaker and his search for materials in the 16th and 17th centuries. In: The prehistory & history of glassmaking technology. Westerville, OH: : American Ceramic Society 1998. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5e208207-d864-e811-80cd-005056af4099

338
Fitzhugh B. Risk and Invention in Human Technological Evolution. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2001;20:125–67. doi:10.1006/jaar.2001.0380

339
Brian Hayden. Practical and Prestige Technologies: The Evolution of Material Systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1998;5:1–55.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177377

340
Henderson et al. J. Experiment and innovation: early Islamic industry at al-Raqqa, Syria. Antiquity 2005;79:130–45.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=505112931&site=ehost-live&scope=site

341
Humphris J, Martinón-Torres M, Rehren T, et al. Variability in single smelting episodes – a pilot study using iron slag from Uganda. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:359–69. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.020

342
Knecht H. The role of innovation in changing early upper paleolithic organic projectile technologies - ResearchGate. Techniques et Culture 1991;:115–44.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/30453447_The_role_of_innovation_in_changing_early_upper_paleolithic_organic_projectile_technologies

343
Lechtman H. Andean value systems and the development of prehistoric metallurgy. Technology and culture 1984;25:1–36.http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/tech/

344
Lesick, Kurtis, University of Calgary. Eureka: the archaeology of innovation & science : proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary. Calgary: : Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary 2002.

345
Loney HL. Society and Technological Control: A Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies. American Antiquity 2000;65:646–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694420

346
Martinón-Torres M, Li XJ, Bevan A, et al. Making Weapons for the Terracotta Army. Archaeology International 2011;13. doi:10.5334/ai.1316

347
Martinón-Torres M. Inside Solomon’s House: An Archaeological Study of the Old Ashmolean Chymical Laboratory in Oxford*. Ambix 2012;59:22–48. doi:10.1179/174582312X13296104891436

348
Martinon-Torres M, Rehren T. Post-medieval crucible productionand distribution: a study of materials and materialities. Archaeometry 2009;51:49–74.http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/people/staff/rehren/usercontent_profile/MMTRehrenMaterialityCruciblesAmetry51.pdf

349
Mellars P. Technological changes across the Middle-upper Palaeolithic transition: economic, social and cognitive perspectives. In: The Human revolution: behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1989. 338–65.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=697b38f3-ba64-e811-80cd-005056af4099

350
Moorey PR. The mobility of artisans and opportunities for technology transfer between Western Asia and Egypt in the Late Bronze Age. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001. 1–14.

351
Margaret C. Nelson. The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:57–100.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20170213

352
Michael J. O’Brien, Thomas D. Holland, Robert J. Hoard and Gregory L. Fox. Evolutionary Implications of Design and Performance Characteristics of Prehistoric Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1994;1:259–304.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177313

353
Raymond, Robert. Out of the fiery furnace: the impact of metals on the history of mankind. University Park: : Pennsylvania State UP 1986.

354
Rehder JE. Blowpipes versus bellows in ancient metallurgy. Journal of Field Archaeology 1994;21.http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/jfa/1994/00000021/00000003/art00005

355
Rehren T, Martinon-Torres M. Naturam ars imitata: European brassmaking between craft and science. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 167–88.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG108_46356.pdf

356
Rehren T, Pusch E, Herold A. Glass coloring works within a copper-centered industrial complex in Late Bronze Age Egypt. In: The prehistory & history of glassmaking technology. Westerville, OH: : American Ceramic Society 1998. 227–50.http://www.academia.edu/1082340/Glass_coloring_works_within_a_copper-centered_industrial_complex_in_Late_Bronze_Age_Egypt

357
Roux V. Ceramic Standardization and Intensity of Production: Quantifying Degrees of Specialization. American Antiquity 2003;68:768–82.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3557072

358
Schiffer MB. The explanation of long-term technological change. In: Anthropological perspectives on technology. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 2001. 215–35.

359
Schiffer, Michael B. Studying technological change: a behavioral approach. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2011.

360
S. J. Shennan and J. R. Wilkinson. Ceramic Style Change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity 2001;66:577–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694174

361
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: : Thames & Hudson 2002.

362
Shortland AJ. Hopeful monsters? Invention and innovation in the archaeological record. In: Invention and innovation: the social context of technological change, 2: Egypt, the Aegean and the Near East, 1650-1150 BC. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2004. 1–11.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=466f3fbb-b764-e811-80cd-005056af4099

363
Torrence, Robin, Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der. What’s new?: a closer look at the process of innovation. London: : Unwin Hyman 1989.

364
Van der Leeuw SE, Papousek DA, Coudart A. Technical traditions and unquestioned assumptions : the case of pottery in Michoacan. Techniques & culture Published Online First: 1992. doi:10.4000/tc.691

365
STRAND B - RESEARCH DESIGN AND MATERIALS ANALYSIS.

366
Archaeometry - Volume 49, Issue 2 - May 2007 - Wiley Online Library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/arch.2007.49.issue-2/issuetoc;jsessionid=C29BB0DA1059927413EA82D1C17CC253.d03t04

367
Archaeometry - Volume 50, Issue 6 - December 2008 - Wiley Online Library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/arch.2008.50.issue-6/issuetoc

368
Archaeometry - Volume 50, Issue 6 - December 2008 - Wiley Online Library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/arch.2008.50.issue-6/issuetoc

369
Artioli G, Angelini I. Scientific methods and cultural heritage: an introduction to the application of materials science to archaeometry and conservation science. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.

370
Bowman S, British Museum. Department of Scientific Research. Science and the past. Toronto, Ont: : University of Toronto Press 1991. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt2tv44s

371
Brothwell DR, Pollard AM. Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001.

372
Demortier G, Adriaens A, European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (Organization), et al. Ion beam study of art and archaeological objects. Luxembourg: : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000.

373
Lambert JB. Traces of the past: unraveling the secrets of archaeology through chemistry. Cambridge, Mass: : Perseus 1997.

374
Ciliberto E, Spoto G. Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000.

375
Edwards HGM, Chalmers JM, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Raman spectroscopy in archaeology and art history. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2005.

376
Edwards, Howell G. M., Lewis, Ian R. Handbook of Raman spectroscopy: from the research laboratory to the process line. New York: : Marcel Dekker 2001.

377
Goffer Z. Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: : Wiley 2007.

378
Henderson J. Scientific analysis in archaeology and its interpretation. Oxford: : Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology 1989.

379
Henderson J. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000.

380
Janssens KHA, Grieken R van. Non-destructive microanalysis of cultural heritage materials. Amsterdam, London: : Elsevier 2004.

381
Martini M, Milazzo M, Piacentini M, et al. Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004.

382
Martinón-Torres M, Rehren T. Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008.

383
Moreau J-F. Proceedings: ISA 2006 : 36th International Symposium on Archaeometry : 2-6 May 2006, Quebec City, Canada. Québec: : CELAT, Université Laval 2009.

384
Arthur M. Sackler Colloquia of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Sciences (U.S.). Scientific examination of art: modern techniques in conservation and analysis : National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., March 19-21, 2003. Washington, D.C.: : National Academies Press 2005.

385
Nesse WD. Introduction to optical mineralogy. 3rd ed. New York: : Oxford University Press 2004.

386
Olsen SL. Scanning electron microscopy in archaeology. Oxford: : B.A.R. 1988.

387
Parkes PA. Current scientific techniques in archaeology. London: : Croom Helm 1986.

388
Pérez-Arantegui J, editor. Proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Archaeometry. 2006.http://ifc.dpz.es/publicaciones/ebooks/id/2610

389
Pollard AM, Heron C, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2008.

390
Pollard AM, Batt C, Young S, et al. Analytical chemistry in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.

391
Shackley, M. Steven. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. New York: : Springer 2011.

392
Shackley M. An introduction to X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis in archaeology. In: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. New York: : Springer 2011. 7–44. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_2

393
Uda M, Demortier G, Nakai I, et al. X-rays for archaeology. Dordrecht: : Springer 2005.

394
De Atley SP, Bishop RL. Toward an integrated interface for archaeology and archaeometry. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. 1991. 358–81.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45285.pdf

395
Hamilton E. The four scales of technical analysis; or ’how to make archaeometry more useful. In: Exploring the role of analytical scale in archaeological interpretation. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2004. 45–8.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45097.pdf

396
Killick D. Archaeology and archaeometry: From casual dating to a meaningful relationship? Antiquity 1997;71:518–24.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217552149?accountid=14511

397
Jones A. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.

398
Jones A. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice*. Archaeometry 2004;46:327–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x

399
Martinón-Torres M. Why should archaeologists take history and science seriously? In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 15–36.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45457.pdf

400
Rehren T. Qantir-Piramesses and the organisation of the Egyptian glass industry. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001. 223–138.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45094.pdf

401
Sillar B, Tite MS. The challenge of ‘Technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

402
Tite MS. Overview - materials study in archaeology. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001. 443–8.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45098.pdf

403
Giumlia-Mair A. Surface characterisation techniques in the study and conservation of art and archaeological artefacts: a review. Materials technology 2010;25:345–261.http://www.academia.edu/3427109/Surface_characterisation_techniques_in_the_study_and_conservation_of_art_and_archaeological_artefacts_a_review_Giumlia-Mair_Albertson_Boschian_Giachi_Lacomussi_Pallecchi_Rossi_Shugar_and_Stock_

404
Dran J-C, Salomon J, Calligaro T, et al. Ion beam analysis of art works: 14 years of use in the Louvre. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 2004;219–220:7–15. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2004.01.019

405
Adriaens A. Non-destructive analysis and testing of museum objects: An overview of 5 years of research. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 2005;60:1503–16. doi:10.1016/j.sab.2005.10.006

406
Hancock RGV. Elemental analysis. In: Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000. 11–20.

407
Shackley M. An introduction to X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis in archaeology. In: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. New York: : Springer 2011. 7–44. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_2

408
Craig N, Speakman RJ, Popelka-Filcoff RS, et al. Comparison of XRF and PXRF for analysis of archaeological obsidian from southern Perú. Journal of Archaeological Science 2007;34:2012–24. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.01.015

409
Speakman RJ, Little NC, Creel D, et al. Sourcing ceramics with portable XRF spectrometers? A comparison with INAA using Mimbres pottery from the American Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Science 2011;38:3483–96. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.011

410
Heginbotham A. AN EVALUATION OF INTER-LABORATORY REPRODUCIBILITY FOR QUANTITATIVE XRF OF HISTORIC COPPER ALLOYS | Arlen Heginbotham - Academia.edu. In: Metal 2010. Proceedings of the International Conference on Metal Conservation, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, October 11-15, 2010. 2010. 244–55.http://www.academia.edu/346786/AN_EVALUATION_OF_INTER-LABORATORY_REPRODUCIBILITY_FOR_QUANTITATIVE_XRF_OF_HISTORIC_COPPER_ALLOYS

411
Guerra MF. Analysis of archaeological metals. The place of XRF and PIXE in the determination of technology and provenance. X-Ray Spectrometry 1998;27:73–80. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4539(199803/04)27:2<73::AID-XRS249>3.0.CO;2-5

412
MILAZZO M, CICARDI C. X-RAY FLUORESCENCE CHARACTERIZATION OF THE CORONA FERREA. Archaeometry 1998;40:351–60. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1998.tb00843.x

413
Figueiredo E, Silva RJC, Araújo MF, et al. Identification of ancient gilding technology and Late Bronze Age metallurgy by EDXRF, Micro-EDXRF, SEM-EDS and metallographic techniques. Microchimica Acta 2010;168:283–91. doi:10.1007/s00604-009-0284-6

414
Orton C. Sampling in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.

415
Tite MS. Archaeological collections: invasive sampling versus object integrity. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology: PIA 2002;13:1–6.http://pia-journal.co.uk/articles/abstract/10.5334/pia.189/

416
Tubb KW. Irreconcilable Differences? Problems with Unprovenanced Antiquities. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 2007;18. doi:10.5334/pia.294

417
Conservation institute TG. Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science - infrared spectroscopy. 1999. http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/infrared_spectroscopy.pdf

418
De Benedetto GE, Laviano R, Sabbatini L, et al. Infrared spectroscopy in the mineralogical characterization of ancient pottery. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2002;3:177–86. doi:10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01178-0

419
Eiland ML, Williams Q. Investigation of Islamic ceramics from Tell Tuneinir using X-ray diffraction. Geoarchaeology 2001;16:875–903. doi:10.1002/gea.1025

420
Conservation institute TG. Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science - infrared spectroscopy. 1999. http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/infrared_spectroscopy.pdf

421
Ricciardi P, Colomban P, Tournié A, et al. A non-invasive study of Roman Age mosaic glass tesserae by means of Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:2551–9. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.07.008

422
Ingo GM, Balbi S, de Caro T, et al. Combined use of SEM-EDS, OM and XRD for the characterization of corrosion products grown on silver roman coins. Applied Physics A 2006;83:493–7. doi:10.1007/s00339-006-3533-0

423
Abe Y, Nakai I, Takahashi K, et al. On-site analysis of archaeological artifacts excavated from the site on the outcrop at Northwest Saqqara, Egypt, by using a newly developed portable fluorescence spectrometer and diffractometer. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2009;395:1987–96. doi:10.1007/s00216-009-3141-x

424
Cotte M, Dumas P, Taniguchi Y, et al. Recent applications and current trends in Cultural Heritage Science using synchrotron-based Fourier transform infrared micro-spectroscopy. Comptes Rendus Physique 2009;10:590–600. doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2009.03.016

425
Young ML, Casadio F, Schnepp S, et al. Non-invasive characterization of manufacturing techniques and corrosion of ancient Chinese bronzes and a later replica using synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Applied Physics A 2010;100:635–46. doi:10.1007/s00339-010-5646-8

426
Baxter MJ. Exploratory multivariate analysis in archaeology. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1994.

427
Baxter MJ. Statistics in archaeology. London: : Arnold 2003.

428
Baxter MJ, Buck CE. Data handling and statistical analysis. In: Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000. 681–746.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45286.pdf

429
BAXTER MJ, FREESTONE IC. LOG-RATIO COMPOSITIONAL DATA ANALYSIS IN ARCHAEOMETRY*. Archaeometry 2006;48:511–31. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00270.x

430
Charlton MF, Blakelock E, Martinon-Torres M. Investigating the production provenance of iron artifacts with multivariate methods. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012;39:2280–93.http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1375923/1/1375923.pdf

431
Drennan RD. Statistics for archaeologists: a commonsense approach. 2nd ed. New York: : Springer 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0413-3

432
Fletcher M, Lock GR. Digging numbers: elementary statistics for archaeologists. Oxford: : Oxford University Committee for Archaeology 1991.

433
Orton, Clive. Mathematics in archaeology. London: : Collins 1980.

434
Shennan S. Quantifying archaeology. 2nd ed. Iowa City: : University of Iowa Press 1997.

435
Thornton CP, Lamberg-Karlovsky CC, Liezers M, et al. On Pins and Needles: Tracing the Evolution of Copper-base Alloying at Tepe Yahya, Iran, via ICP-MS Analysis of Common-place Items. Journal of Archaeological Science 2002;29:1451–60. doi:10.1006/jasc.2002.0809

436
Ponting MJ. Keeping up with the Romans? Romanisation and copper alloys in First Revolt Palestine. Institute for Archaeo-Metallurgical Studies newsletter 2002;22:3–6.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL3001_44722.pdf

437
Chippindale C. Colleagues, talking, writing, publishing. In: Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: : Altamira Press 2006. 1339–71.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45101.pdf

438
Sand-Jensen K. How to write consistently boring scientific literature. Oikos 2007;116:723–7. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15674.x

439
White P. Producing the record. In: Archaeology in practice: a student guide to archaeological analyses. Malden, MA: : Blackwell 2006. 410–25.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45099.pdf

Bibliography for ARCLG107: Technology and Analysis of Archaeological Material: Marcos Martinon-Torres BETA