1.
Plato, Cooper, John M., Hutchinson, D. S. Complete works. Cambridge: Hackett; 1997.
2.
Plato, Hamilton, Edith, Cairns, Huntington. The collected dialogues of Plato, including the letters. Vol. Bollingen series. Princeton [N.J.]: Princeton University Press; 1961.
3.
Mason, Andrew S. Plato. Durham: Acumen; 2010.
4.
Ackrill, J. L. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
5.
Annas, Julia, Rowe, C. J. New perspectives on Plato, modern and ancient. Vol. Center for Hellenic Studies colloquia. Washington, D.C.: Center for Hellenic Studies; 2002.
6.
Benson, Hugh H. A companion to Plato. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006.
7.
Benson, Hugh H. Essays on the philosophy of Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
8.
Fine, Gail. Plato. Vol. Oxford readings in philosophy. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press; 1999.
9.
Fine, Gail. Plato on knowledge and forms: selected essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2003.
10.
Fine, Gail. The Oxford handbook of Plato. Vol. [Oxford handbooks series]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
11.
Irwin T. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford University Press; 1995.
12.
Kahn, Charles H. Plato and the Socratic dialogue: the philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
13.
Kraut, Richard. The Cambridge companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
14.
Nehamas, Alexander. Virtues of authenticity: essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1999.
15.
Rowe CJ. Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482625
16.
Rutherford, R. B. The art of Plato: ten essays in Platonic interpretation. London: Duckworth; 1995.
17.
Stokes, Michael C. Plato’s Socratic conversations: drama and dialectic in three dialogues. London: Athlone; 1986.
18.
Vlastos, Gregory. Plato: a collection of critical essays. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press; 1978.
19.
Vlastos, Gregory. Platonic studies. 2nd print., with corrections. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1981.
20.
Vlastos, Gregory. Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31900.0001.001
21.
Vlastos, Gregory, Burnyeat, Myles. Socratic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
22.
Beversluis, John. Cross-examining Socrates: a defense of the interlocutors in Plato’s early dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
23.
Blondell, Ruby. The play of character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
24.
Kahn, Charles H. Plato and the Socratic dialogue: the philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
25.
McCabe MM. Plato’s Ways of Writing. In: The Oxford handbook of Plato [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 88–113. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14463163500004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
26.
Nails D. The Life of Plato of Athens. In: A companion to Plato [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006. p. 1–12. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470996256
27.
Rowe CJ. Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482625
28.
Rutherford, R. B. The art of Plato: ten essays in Platonic interpretation. London: Duckworth; 1995.
29.
Schofield M. Plato in his time and place. In: The Oxford handbook of Plato [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 36–62. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14463163500004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
30.
Stokes, Michael C. Plato’s Socratic conversations: drama and dialectic in three dialogues. London: Athlone; 1986.
31.
Brandwood L. Stylometry and Chronology. In: The Cambridge companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. p. 90–120.
32.
Irwin T. The Platonic Corpus. In: The Oxford handbook of Plato [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 63–87. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14463163500004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
33.
Rowe CJ. Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482625
34.
Sedley D. The Midwife of Platonism. Oxford University Press; 2004.
35.
Young C. Plato and Computer Dating. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. 1994;12:227–50.
36.
Plato, Denyer, Nicholas. Alcibiades. Vol. Cambridge Greek and Latin classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
37.
Benson HH. The dissolution of the Problem of the Elenchus. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. 1995;13:45–112.
38.
Forster M. Socrates’ Profession of Ignorance. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. 2007;32:1–35.
39.
Kahn, Charles H. Plato and the Socratic dialogue: the philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
40.
Penner T. Socrates and the Early Dialogues. In: The Cambridge companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. p. 121–69.
41.
Vlastos, Gregory. Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31900.0001.001
42.
Vlastos, Gregory, Burnyeat, Myles. Socratic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
43.
Vlastos, Gregory. Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31900.0001.001
44.
Benson, Hugh H. Essays on the philosophy of Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
45.
Benson HH. Misunderstanding the ‘What-is-F-ness’ Question. In: Essays on the philosophy of Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 123–37.
46.
Beversluis J. Does Socrates commit the Socratic Fallacy? In: Essays on the philosophy of Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 107–22.
47.
Brickhouse, Thomas C., Smith, Nicholas D. The philosophy of Socrates. Vol. History of ancient and medieval philosophy. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press; 2000.
48.
Charles D. Types of Definition in the Meno. In: Remembering Socrates: philosophical essays. Oxford: Clarendon; 2006. p. 110–28.
49.
Geach P. Plato’s Euthyphro: an analysis and commentary. In: Plato’s Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito: critical essays [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2005. p. 23–34. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1352163
50.
SANTAS G. The Socratic Fallacy. Journal of the History of Philosophy. 1972;10(2):127–41.
51.
Geach P. Plato’s Euthyphro: an analysis and commentary. In: Plato’s Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito: critical essays [Internet]. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2005. p. 23–34. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1352163
52.
Beversluis J. Does Socrates commit the Socratic Fallacy? In: Essays on the philosophy of Socrates. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 107–22.
53.
R. E. Allen. The Socratic Paradox. Journal of the History of Ideas. 1960;21(2):256–65.
54.
Brickhouse T, Smith ND. The Socratic Paradoxes. In: A companion to Plato [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006. p. 263–77. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470996256
55.
David Gallop. The Socratic Paradox in the ‘Protagoras’. Phronesis. Vol. 9(No. 2):117–29.
56.
Gerasimos Santas. The Socratic Paradoxes. The Philosophical Review. 1964;73(2):147–64.
57.
Plato. Plato’s Meno [Internet]. Scott D, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482632
58.
Segvic H. No One Errs Willingly: The Meaning of Socratic Intellectualism. In: A companion to Socrates. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub; 2006. p. 171–85.
59.
Vlastos, Gregory. Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31900.0001.001
60.
Weiss, Roslyn. The socratic paradox and its enemies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2006.
61.
Thomas C. Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith. Socrates and the Unity of the Virtues. The Journal of Ethics [Internet]. 1997;1(4):311–24. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25115557
62.
Devereux D. The Unity of the Virtues. In: A companion to Plato [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006. p. 325–41. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470996256
63.
Hobbs, Angela. Plato and the hero: courage, manliness, and the impersonal good. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
64.
Irwin T. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford University Press; 1995.
65.
Terry Penner. The Unity of Virtue. The Philosophical Review. 1973;82(1):35–68.
66.
Gregory Vlastos. The Unity of the Virtues in the ‘Protagoras’. The Review of Metaphysics [Internet]. 1972;25(3):415–58. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20126056
67.
Brickhouse T, Smith ND. The Socratic Paradoxes. In: A companion to Plato [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006. p. 263–77. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470996256
68.
Barney R. GORGIAS’ DEFENSE: PLATO AND HIS OPPONENTS ON RHETORIC AND THE GOOD. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2010 Apr 8;48(1):95–121.
69.
Kahn C. Drama and Dialectic in Plato’s Gorgias. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. 1983;1:75–122.
70.
Kahn, Charles H. Plato and the Socratic dialogue: the philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
71.
Rutherford, R. B. The art of Plato: ten essays in Platonic interpretation. London: Duckworth; 1995.
72.
Scott D. Platonic Pessimism and Moral Education. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. 1999;17:15–36.
73.
Vlastos, Gregory. Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31900.0001.001
74.
Kahn, Charles H. Plato and the Socratic dialogue: the philosophical use of a literary form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
75.
Beversluis, John. Cross-examining Socrates: a defense of the interlocutors in Plato’s early dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
76.
Anne Carson. How Not to Read a Poem: Unmixing Simonides from ‘Protagoras’. Classical Philology [Internet]. 1992;87(2):110–30. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/269522
77.
Gagarin M. The Purpose of Plato’s Protagoras. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association. 1969;100:133–64.
78.
Long A. Character and Consensus in Plato’s Protagoras. The Cambridge classical journal: proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. 2005;51(1):1–20.
79.
Rutherford, R. B. The art of Plato: ten essays in Platonic interpretation. London: Duckworth; 1995.
80.
Plato, Taylor, C. C. W. Protagoras. Vol. Clarendon Plato series. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1976.
81.
Raphael Woolf. Consistency and Akrasia in Plato’s ‘Protagoras’. Phronesis [Internet]. 2002;47(3):224–52. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182699
82.
Day, Jane M., Plato. Plato’s Meno in focus. Vol. Routledge philosophers in focus series. London: Routledge; 1994.
83.
Daniel T. Devereux. Nature and Teaching in Plato’s ‘Meno’. Phronesis [Internet]. 1978;23(2):118–26. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182035
84.
Lee Franklin. The Structure of Dialectic in the ‘Meno’. Phronesis [Internet]. 2001;46(4):413–39. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182680
85.
Nehamas A. Meno’s paradox and Socrates as a teacher. In: Plato’s Meno in focus. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 221–48.
86.
Plato. Plato’s Meno [Internet]. Scott D, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482632
87.
Vlastos, Gregory. Socrates: ironist and moral philosopher [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb31900.0001.001
88.
Ackrill, J. L. Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
89.
Hugh H. Benson. ‘Meno’, the Slave Boy and the Elenchos. Phronesis [Internet]. 1990;35(2):128–58. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182354
90.
Bostock, David. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon; 1986.
91.
Panos Dimas. Recollecting Forms in the ‘Phaedo’. Phronesis [Internet]. 2003;48(3):175–214. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182728
92.
Fine G. Inquiry in the Meno. In: The Cambridge companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. p. 200–26.
93.
Moravcsik J. Learning as Recollection. In: Plato’s Meno in focus. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 112–28.
94.
Scott, Dominic. Recollection and experience: Plato’s theory of learning and its successors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
95.
Plato. Plato’s Meno [Internet]. Scott D, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482632
96.
Vlastos G. Anamnesis in the Meno. In: Plato’s Meno in focus. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 88–111.
97.
Vlastos G. Anamnesis in the Meno. In: Plato’s Meno in focus. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 88–111.
98.
Plato. Plato’s Meno [Internet]. Scott D, editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482632
99.
Bostock, David. Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon; 1986.
100.
Denyer N. The Phaedo’s Final Argument. In: Maieusis: essays on ancient philosophy in honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 87–96.
101.
Dorothea Frede. The Final Proof of the Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s ‘Phaedo’ 102a-107a. Phronesis [Internet]. 1978;23(1):27–41. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182027
102.
David Gallop. Plato’s ‘Cyclical Argument’ Recycled. Phronesis [Internet]. 1982;27(3):207–22. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182153
103.
Plato, Hackforth, R. Plato’s ‘Phaedo’. London: Cambridge University Press; 1955.
104.
Rowe CJ. Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482625
105.
Jerome Schiller. ‘Phaedo’ 104-105: Is the Soul a Form? Phronesis [Internet]. 1967;12(1):50–8. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4181792
106.
Denyer N. The Phaedo’s Final Argument. In: Maieusis: essays on ancient philosophy in honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 87–96.
107.
Ferejohn M. Knowledge and the Forms in Plato. In: A companion to Plato [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006. p. 146–62. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470996256
108.
Harte V. Plato’s Metaphysics. In: The Oxford handbook of Plato [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 191–216. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14463163500004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
109.
Irwin T. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford University Press; 1995.
110.
Nehamas, Alexander. Virtues of authenticity: essays on Plato and Socrates. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1999.
111.
David Sedley. Platonic Causes. Phronesis [Internet]. 1998;43(2):114–32. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182582
112.
Vlastos, Gregory. Platonic studies. 2nd print., with corrections. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1981.
113.
Harte V. Plato’s Metaphysics. In: The Oxford handbook of Plato [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 191–216. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14463163500004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
114.
David Sedley. Platonic Causes. Phronesis [Internet]. 1998;43(2):114–32. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4182582
115.
Anagnostopoulos M. The Divided Soul and the Desire for Good in Plato’s Republic. In: The Blackwell guide to Plato’s Republic [Internet]. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006. p. 166–88. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470776414
116.
Cooper J. Plato’s Theory of Human Motivation. In: Plato. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press; 1999.
117.
Ferrari G. The Three-Part Soul. In: The Cambridge companion to Plato’s Republic [Internet]. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 165–201. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521839637
118.
Lorenz H. Desire and Reason in Plato’s Republic. Oxford studies in ancient philosophy. 2004;
119.
Lorenz, Hendrik. The brute within: appetitive desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
120.
Lovibond S. Plato’s Theory of Mind. In: Psychology. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 1991. p. 35–55.
121.
Richard Robinson. Plato’s Separation of Reason from Desire. Phronesis [Internet]. 1971;16(1):38–48. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4181855
122.
Cooper J. Plato’s Theory of Human Motivation. In: Plato. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press; 1999.
123.
Burnyeat, Myles, Plato, Levett, M. J. The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett; 1990.