1
Taylor P. From patient data to medical knowledge: the principles and practice of health informatics. London: : BMJ 2006.
2
Coiera E. Guide to health informatics. Third edition. Boca Raton: : CRC Press 2015.
3
Foley T, Fairmichael F. The Potential of Learning Healthcare Systems. 2015.http://www.learninghealthcareproject.org/publication/1/112/the-potential-of-learning-healthcare-systems
4
Wachter R. Using information technology to improve the NHS. 2016.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/using-information-technology-to-improve-the-nhs
5
GREENHALGH T, Potts HWW, Wong G, et al. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. The Milbank Quarterly 2009;87:729–88. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x
6
Friedman C, Rubin J, Brown J, et al. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Published Online First: 23 October 2014. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002977
7
Yom-Tov E, Borsa D, Cox IJ, et al. Detecting Disease Outbreaks in Mass Gatherings Using Internet Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2014;16. doi:10.2196/jmir.3156
8
Dixon J, Sanderson C, Elliott P, et al. Assessment of the reproducibility of clinical coding in routinely collected hospital activitydata: a study in two hospitals. Journal of Public Health 1998;20:63–9.http://jpubhealth.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/1/63
9
Taylor P. Rigging the Death Rate. The London Review of Books Published Online First: 11AD.http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n07/paul-taylor/rigging-the-death-rate
10
Freemantle N, Richardson M, Wood J, et al. Weekend hospitalization and additional risk of death: An analysis of inpatient data. JRSM 2012;105:74–84. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2012.120009
11
Li L, Rothwell PM. Biases in detection of apparent "weekend effect” on outcome with administrative coding data: population based study of stroke. BMJ Published Online First: 16 May 2016. doi:10.1136/bmj.i2648
12
Li L, Cheng W-Y, Glicksberg BS, et al. Identification of type 2 diabetes subgroups through topological analysis of patient similarity. Science Translational Medicine 2015;7:311ra174-311ra174. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9364
13
D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2008;117:743–53. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579
14
Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN, et al. Comparing Patient-Reported Hospital Adverse Events with Medical Record Review: Do Patients Know Something That Hospitals Do Not? Annals of Internal Medicine 2008;149. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-2-200807150-00006
15
Staa T-P v., Goldacre B, Gulliford M, et al. Pragmatic randomised trials using routine electronic health records: putting them to the test. BMJ 2012;344:e55–e55. doi:10.1136/bmj.e55
16
GREENHALGH T, ROBERT G, MACFARLANE F, et al. Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 2004;82:581–629. doi:10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
17
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science 2011;6. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
18
Fox J, Gutenstein M, Khan O, et al. OpenClinical.net: A platform for creating and sharing knowledge and promoting best practice in healthcare. Computers in Industry 2015;66:63–72. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.001
19
Sherlaw-Johnson C. A Method for Detecting Runs of Good and Bad Clinical Outcomes on Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) Charts. Health Care Management Science 2005;8:61–5. doi:10.1007/s10729-005-5217-2
20
Rapley T, May C, Heaven B, et al. Doctor–patient interaction in a randomised controlled trial of decision-support tools. Social Science & Medicine 2006;62:2267–78. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.011
21
Carpenter I, Ram MB, Croft GP, et al. Medical records and record-keeping standards. Clinical Medicine 2007;7:328–31. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.7-4-328
22
Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods of Information in Medicine 1998;37:394–403.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3415631/
23
IHTSDO. SNOMED Clinical Terms ® User Guide January 2010 International Release. 2010.
24
Rector AL. Clinical Terminology: Why Is it so Hard? Methods of Information in Medicine 1999;38:239–52.
25
Rector AL, Brandt S, Schneider T. Getting the foot out of the pelvis: modeling problems affecting use of SNOMED CT hierarchies in practical applications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011;18:432–40. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000045
26
Cornet R. Definitions and Qualifiers in SNOMED CT. Methods of Information in Medicine 2009;48:178–83.
27
Bramley M. A framework for evaluating health classifications . Health Information Management 2005;34:71–83.http://www.himaa.org.au/members/journal/34_3_2006/pdf/bramley.pdf
28
Sampalli T, Shepherd M, Duffy J, et al. An evaluation of SNOMED CT® in the domain of complex chronic conditions. International Journal of Integrated Care 2010;10.
29
Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care PhysiciansImplications for Patient Safety and Continuity of Care. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2007;297. doi:10.1001/jama.297.8.831
30
Knowles RL, Bull C, Wren C, et al. Ethics, governance and consent in the UK: implications for research into the longer-term outcomes of congenital heart defects. Archives of Disease in Childhood 2009;96:14–20. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.152975
31
Lyons RA, Jones KH, John G, et al. The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2009;9. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-3
32
Singleton P, Wadsworth M. Consent for the use of personal medical data in research. BMJ 2006;333:255–8. doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7561.255
33
Willard HF, Angrist M, Ginsburg GS. Genomic medicine: genetic variation and its impact on the future of health care. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2005;360:1543–50. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1683
34
Eichelbaum M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Drug Therapy. Annual Review of Medicine 2006;57:119–37. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.56.082103.104724
35
El Emam K, Buckeridge D, Tamblyn R, et al. The re-identification risk of Canadians from longitudinal demographics. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2011;11. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-46
36
McCowan C, Kidd B, Fahey T. Factors associated with mortality in Scottish patients receiving methadone in primary care: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2009;338:b2225–b2225. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2225
37
Xu H, Jiang M, Oetjens M, et al. Facilitating pharmacogenetic studies using electronic health records and natural-language processing: a case study of warfarin. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011;18:387–91. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000208
38
Willison DJ, Emerson C, Szala-Meneok KV, et al. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards. Journal of Medical Ethics 2008;34:308–14. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.020032
39
Winkler WE. Overview of Record Linkage and Current Research Directions (Statistics #2006-2). RESEARCH REPORT SERIES. 2006.
40
McCartney M. Care.data doesn’t care enough about consent. BMJ 2014;348:g2831–g2831. doi:10.1136/bmj.g2831
41
Sheather J, Brannan S. Patient confidentiality in a time of care.data. BMJ 2013;347:f7042–f7042. doi:10.1136/bmj.f7042
42
Fellegi IP, Sunter AB. A Theory for Record Linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1969;64:1183–210.
43
Finney JM, Walker A, Peto TE, et al. An efficient record linkage scheme using graphical analysis for identifier error detection. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2011;11. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-11-7
44
Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2012;344:e3874–e3874. doi:10.1136/bmj.e3874
45
Cottrell E, Chambers R, O’Connell P. Using simple telehealth in primary care to reduce blood pressure: a service evaluation. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001391–e001391. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001391
46
Cottrell E, McMillan K, Chambers R. A cross-sectional survey and service evaluation of simple telehealth in primary care: what do patients think? BMJ Open 2012;2:e001392–e001392. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001392
47
Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, et al. Home telehealth for diabetes management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2009;11:913–30. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01057.x
48
Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 2012;12. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-220
49
NHS e - Referral Service Vision and Key messages. http://systems.hscic.gov.uk/ers/ersvision.pdf
50
Choose and Book Directory of Services. http://www.chooseandbook.nhs.uk/staff/communications/fact/dos.pdf
51
Greenhalgh T, Stones R, Swinglehurst D. Choose and Book: A sociological analysis of ‘resistance’ to an expert system. Social Science & Medicine 2014;104:210–9. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.014
52
Gallivan S, Utley M, Treasure T, et al. Booked inpatient admissions and hospital capacity: mathematical modelling study. BMJ 2002;324:280–2. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7332.280
53
Green J, McDowall Z, Potts HW. Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients’ experience of outpatient appointment booking. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008;8. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-8-36
54
Mol A. The Logic of Care. Routledge 2008. doi:10.4324/9780203927076
55
Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, et al. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study. BMJ 2010;340:c3111–c3111. doi:10.1136/bmj.c3111
56
Greenhalgh T, Hinder S, Stramer K, et al. Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. BMJ 2010;341:c5814–c5814. doi:10.1136/bmj.c5814
57
Walport M. Do summary care records have the potential to do more harm than good? No. BMJ 2010;340:c3022–c3022. doi:10.1136/bmj.c3022
58
Anderson R. Do summary care records have the potential to do more harm than good? Yes. BMJ 2010;340:c3020–c3020. doi:10.1136/bmj.c3020
59
Greenhalgh T, Wood GW, Bratan T, et al. Patients’ attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study. BMJ 2008;336:1290–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.a114
60
Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13:121–6. doi:10.1197/jamia.M2025
61
Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, et al. Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors’ Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157:461–70. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002
62
Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005 - executive summary : Department of Health - Publications.
63
Greenhalgh T, Bratan T, Byrne E, et al. The Devil’s in the Detail: Final report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and HealthSpace programmes. 2010.
64
Adams T, Budden M, Hoare C, et al. Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: issues of data protection and consent. BMJ 2004;328:871–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7444.871
65
BMA Policies BMA General Practitioners, 2006. 2006.
66
National: Medical records: Whose right to know?: What can patients do? The Guardian Newspaper Published Online First: 1 November 2006.http://search.proquest.com/docview/246527595?accountid=14511
67
Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2012;12. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-15
68
Greenhalgh T, Keen J. England’s national programme for IT. BMJ 2013;346:f4130–f4130. doi:10.1136/bmj.f4130
69
Blumenthal D. Implementation of the Federal Health Information Technology Initiative. New England Journal of Medicine 2011;365:2426–31. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr1112158
70
Wright A, Henkin S, Feblowitz J, et al. Early Results of the Meaningful Use Program for Electronic Health Records. New England Journal of Medicine 2013;368:779–80. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1213481
71
Koppel R, Lehmann CU. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2014;22:465–71. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003023
72
Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR Trap — The Future of Health IT. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;366:2240–2. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1203102
73
Wachter R. The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age. New York: : McGraw-Hill 2015. https://go.oreilly.com/university-college-london/library/view/~/9780071849470/?ar
74
O’Dowd A. New e-records system leads to 20% drop in emergency department performance at Addenbrooke’s. BMJ 2014;349:g7537–g7537. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7537
75
National Programme for IT: costs and benefits. Department of Health 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/final-benefits-statement-for-programmes-previously-managed-under-the-national-programme-for-it
76
Addenbrookes and the Rosie Hospitals (Quality Report). 2015.http://www.cqc.org.uk/location/RGT01
77
Shapiro JS, Mostashari F, Hripcsak G, et al. Using Health Information Exchange to Improve Public Health. American Journal of Public Health 2011;101:616–23. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.158980
78
Dixon BE, Pina J, Kharrazi H, et al. What’s Past is Prologue: A Scoping Review of Recent Public and Global Health Informatics Literature. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics 2015;7. doi:10.5210/ojphi.v7i2.5931
79
Koo D, O’Carroll P, LaVenture M. Public Health 101 for Informaticians. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 2001;8.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC130068/
