1
Taylor P. From patient data to medical knowledge: the principles and practice of health informatics. London: BMJ 2006.
2
Coiera E. Guide to health informatics. Third edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press 2015.
3
Foley T, Fairmichael F. The Potential of Learning Healthcare Systems. 2015.
4
Wachter R. Using information technology to improve the NHS. 2016.
5
GREENHALGH T, Potts HWW, Wong G, et al. Tensions and paradoxes in electronic patient record research: a systematic literature review using the meta-narrative method. The Milbank Quarterly. 2009;87:729–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x
6
Friedman C, Rubin J, Brown J, et al. Toward a science of learning systems: a research agenda for the high-functioning Learning Health System. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. Published Online First: 23 October 2014. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002977
7
Yom-Tov E, Borsa D, Cox IJ, et al. Detecting Disease Outbreaks in Mass Gatherings Using Internet Data. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014;16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3156
8
Dixon J, Sanderson C, Elliott P, et al. Assessment of the reproducibility of clinical coding in routinely collected hospital activitydata: a study in two hospitals. Journal of Public Health. 1998;20:63–9.
9
Taylor P. Rigging the Death Rate. The London Review of Books. Published Online First: 11 AD.
10
Freemantle N, Richardson M, Wood J, et al. Weekend hospitalization and additional risk of death: An analysis of inpatient data. JRSM. 2012;105:74–84. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120009
11
Li L, Rothwell PM. Biases in detection of apparent "weekend effect” on outcome with administrative coding data: population based study of stroke. BMJ. Published Online First: 16 May 2016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2648
12
Li L, Cheng W-Y, Glicksberg BS, et al. Identification of type 2 diabetes subgroups through topological analysis of patient similarity. Science Translational Medicine. 2015;7:311ra174-311ra174. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9364
13
D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008;117:743–53. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579
14
Weissman JS, Schneider EC, Weingart SN, et al. Comparing Patient-Reported Hospital Adverse Events with Medical Record Review: Do Patients Know Something That Hospitals Do Not? Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;149. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-2-200807150-00006
15
Staa T-P v., Goldacre B, Gulliford M, et al. Pragmatic randomised trials using routine electronic health records: putting them to the test. BMJ. 2012;344:e55–e55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e55
16
GREENHALGH T, ROBERT G, MACFARLANE F, et al. Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82:581–629. doi: 10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
17
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science. 2011;6. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
18
Fox J, Gutenstein M, Khan O, et al. OpenClinical.net: A platform for creating and sharing knowledge and promoting best practice in healthcare. Computers in Industry. 2015;66:63–72. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.001
19
Sherlaw-Johnson C. A Method for Detecting Runs of Good and Bad Clinical Outcomes on Variable Life-Adjusted Display (VLAD) Charts. Health Care Management Science. 2005;8:61–5. doi: 10.1007/s10729-005-5217-2
20
Rapley T, May C, Heaven B, et al. Doctor–patient interaction in a randomised controlled trial of decision-support tools. Social Science & Medicine. 2006;62:2267–78. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.011
21
Carpenter I, Ram MB, Croft GP, et al. Medical records and record-keeping standards. Clinical Medicine. 2007;7:328–31. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.7-4-328
22
Cimino JJ. Desiderata for controlled medical vocabularies in the twenty-first century. Methods of Information in Medicine. 1998;37:394–403.
23
IHTSDO. SNOMED Clinical Terms ® User Guide January 2010 International Release. 2010.
24
Rector AL. Clinical Terminology: Why Is it so Hard? Methods of Information in Medicine. 1999;38:239–52.
25
Rector AL, Brandt S, Schneider T. Getting the foot out of the pelvis: modeling problems affecting use of SNOMED CT hierarchies in practical applications. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011;18:432–40. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000045
26
Cornet R. Definitions and Qualifiers in SNOMED CT. Methods of Information in Medicine. 2009;48:178–83.
27
Bramley M. A framework for evaluating health classifications . Health Information Management. 2005;34:71–83.
28
Sampalli T, Shepherd M, Duffy J, et al. An evaluation of SNOMED CT® in the domain of complex chronic conditions. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2010;10.
29
Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, et al. Deficits in Communication and Information Transfer Between Hospital-Based and Primary Care PhysiciansImplications for Patient Safety and Continuity of Care. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007;297. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.8.831
30
Knowles RL, Bull C, Wren C, et al. Ethics, governance and consent in the UK: implications for research into the longer-term outcomes of congenital heart defects. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2009;96:14–20. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.152975
31
Lyons RA, Jones KH, John G, et al. The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2009;9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-3
32
Singleton P, Wadsworth M. Consent for the use of personal medical data in research. BMJ. 2006;333:255–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7561.255
33
Willard HF, Angrist M, Ginsburg GS. Genomic medicine: genetic variation and its impact on the future of health care. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2005;360:1543–50. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1683
34
Eichelbaum M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Evans WE. Pharmacogenomics and Individualized Drug Therapy. Annual Review of Medicine. 2006;57:119–37. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.56.082103.104724
35
El Emam K, Buckeridge D, Tamblyn R, et al. The re-identification risk of Canadians from longitudinal demographics. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2011;11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-46
36
McCowan C, Kidd B, Fahey T. Factors associated with mortality in Scottish patients receiving methadone in primary care: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2009;338:b2225–b2225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2225
37
Xu H, Jiang M, Oetjens M, et al. Facilitating pharmacogenetic studies using electronic health records and natural-language processing: a case study of warfarin. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011;18:387–91. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000208
38
Willison DJ, Emerson C, Szala-Meneok KV, et al. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2008;34:308–14. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.020032
39
Winkler WE. Overview of Record Linkage and Current Research Directions (Statistics #2006-2). RESEARCH REPORT SERIES. 2006.
40
McCartney M. Care.data doesn’t care enough about consent. BMJ. 2014;348:g2831–g2831. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2831
41
Sheather J, Brannan S. Patient confidentiality in a time of care.data. BMJ. 2013;347:f7042–f7042. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7042
42
Fellegi IP, Sunter AB. A Theory for Record Linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1969;64:1183–210.
43
Finney JM, Walker A, Peto TE, et al. An efficient record linkage scheme using graphical analysis for identifier error detection. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2011;11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-7
44
Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3874–e3874. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3874
45
Cottrell E, Chambers R, O’Connell P. Using simple telehealth in primary care to reduce blood pressure: a service evaluation. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001391–e001391. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001391
46
Cottrell E, McMillan K, Chambers R. A cross-sectional survey and service evaluation of simple telehealth in primary care: what do patients think? BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001392–e001392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001392
47
Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, et al. Home telehealth for diabetes management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2009;11:913–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01057.x
48
Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-220
49
NHS e - Referral Service Vision and Key messages.
50
Choose and Book Directory of Services.
51
Greenhalgh T, Stones R, Swinglehurst D. Choose and Book: A sociological analysis of ‘resistance’ to an expert system. Social Science & Medicine. 2014;104:210–9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.014
52
Gallivan S, Utley M, Treasure T, et al. Booked inpatient admissions and hospital capacity: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2002;324:280–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7332.280
53
Green J, McDowall Z, Potts HW. Does Choose & Book fail to deliver the expected choice to patients? A survey of patients’ experience of outpatient appointment booking. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2008;8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-36
54
Mol A. The Logic of Care. Routledge 2008.
55
Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, et al. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed-method case study. BMJ. 2010;340:c3111–c3111. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3111
56
Greenhalgh T, Hinder S, Stramer K, et al. Adoption, non-adoption, and abandonment of a personal electronic health record: case study of HealthSpace. BMJ. 2010;341:c5814–c5814. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5814
57
Walport M. Do summary care records have the potential to do more harm than good? No. BMJ. 2010;340:c3022–c3022. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3022
58
Anderson R. Do summary care records have the potential to do more harm than good? Yes. BMJ. 2010;340:c3020–c3020. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c3020
59
Greenhalgh T, Wood GW, Bratan T, et al. Patients’ attitudes to the summary care record and HealthSpace: qualitative study. BMJ. 2008;336:1290–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a114
60
Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, et al. Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2006;13:121–6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2025
61
Delbanco T, Walker J, Bell SK, et al. Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors’ Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2012;157:461–70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002
62
Information for health: an information strategy for the modern NHS 1998-2005 - executive summary : Department of Health - Publications.
63
Greenhalgh T, Bratan T, Byrne E, et al. The Devil’s in the Detail: Final report of the independent evaluation of the Summary Care Record and HealthSpace programmes. 2010.
64
Adams T, Budden M, Hoare C, et al. Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: issues of data protection and consent. BMJ. 2004;328:871–4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7444.871
65
BMA Policies BMA General Practitioners, 2006. 2006.
66
National: Medical records: Whose right to know?: What can patients do? The Guardian Newspaper. Published Online First: 1 November 2006.
67
Cresswell KM, Worth A, Sheikh A. Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2012;12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-15
68
Greenhalgh T, Keen J. England’s national programme for IT. BMJ. 2013;346:f4130–f4130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4130
69
Blumenthal D. Implementation of the Federal Health Information Technology Initiative. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365:2426–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1112158
70
Wright A, Henkin S, Feblowitz J, et al. Early Results of the Meaningful Use Program for Electronic Health Records. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;368:779–80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1213481
71
Koppel R, Lehmann CU. Implications of an emerging EHR monoculture for hospitals and healthcare systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014;22:465–71. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003023
72
Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR Trap — The Future of Health IT. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;366:2240–2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1203102
73
Wachter R. The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age. New York: McGraw-Hill 2015.
74
O’Dowd A. New e-records system leads to 20% drop in emergency department performance at Addenbrooke’s. BMJ. 2014;349:g7537–g7537. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7537
75
National Programme for IT: costs and benefits. Department of Health 2013.
76
Addenbrookes and the Rosie Hospitals (Quality Report). 2015.
77
Shapiro JS, Mostashari F, Hripcsak G, et al. Using Health Information Exchange to Improve Public Health. American Journal of Public Health. 2011;101:616–23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.158980
78
Dixon BE, Pina J, Kharrazi H, et al. What’s Past is Prologue: A Scoping Review of Recent Public and Global Health Informatics Literature. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. 2015;7. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v7i2.5931
79
Koo D, O’Carroll P, LaVenture M. Public Health 101 for Informaticians. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 2001;8.
