1.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
2.
Romano C, Alter KJ, Shany Y, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. First edition. Oxford University Press; 2014. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/law/9780199660681.001.0001
3.
Merrills JG. International Dispute Settlement. 5th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
4.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
5.
Webb P. International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation. Vol International courts and tribunals series. First edition. Oxford University Press; 2013. doi:10.1093/law/9780199671151.001.0001
6.
Boisson de Chazournes L, Kohen MG, Viñuales JE. Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9789004209985
7.
Shany Y. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts. Oxford Scholarship; 2013. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199643295.001.0001/acprof-9780199643295
8.
Sands P. Lawless World: Making and Breaking Global Rules. Penguin; 2006.
9.
Evans MD. Remedies in International Law: The Institutional Dilemma. Vol EC/International law forum. Hart Publishing; 1998.
10.
Treaty Series. No. 9. 1901. International Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes; signed at the Hague, July 29, 1899. 20th Century House of Commons Sessional Papers. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1902-001880
11.
Treaty Series No. 6 (1971). Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, the Hague, 18th October, 1907. 20th Century House of Commons Sessional Papers. I.643. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1970-059763
12.
Treaty Series No. 32 (1931). General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes (Geneva, September, 1928). 20th Century House of Commons Sessional Papers. 335. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1930-031285
13.
Nations U. United Nations Charter. http://www.un.org/en/index.html
14.
George H. Aldrich and Christine M. Chinkin. Introduction. The American Journal of International Law. 2000;94(1):1-3. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555227?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
15.
George H. Aldrich and Christine M. Chinkin. A Century of Achievement and Unfinished Work. The American Journal of International Law. 2000;94(1):90-98. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555233?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
16.
David D. Caron. War and International Adjudication: Reflections on the 1899 Peace Conference. The American Journal of International Law. 2000;94(1):4-30. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555228?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
17.
Synoptic Chart. http://www.pict-pcti.org/
18.
Romano, Cesare P.R. Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle, The. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 1998;31. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=709&handle=hein.journals%2Fnyuilp31&collection=journals
19.
Romano C. The Price of International Justice. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. 2005;4(2):281-328. doi:10.1163/1571803054515311
20.
International Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes; signed at the Hague, July 29, 1899. 20th Century House of Commons Sessional Papers. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1902-001880
21.
Convention for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes. the Hague, 18th October 1907. 20th Century House of Commons Sessional Papers. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1968-057818
22.
Nations U. United Nations Charter. http://www.un.org/en/
23.
Nations U. Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations - UN Documents: Gathering a body of global agreements. Published 1970. http://www.un.org/
24.
Nations U. Manila Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes. Published 1982. http://www.un.org/en/
25.
London School of Economics and Political Science. Report of the Rainbow Warrior Affair. International law reports. 74.
26.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
27.
Merrills JG. International Dispute Settlement. 5th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
28.
Anderson D. Negotiation and Dispute Settlement. Vol EC/International law forum. Hart Publishing; 1998.
29.
Franck TM. Administrative Impartiality as Fairness: the UN Secretary-Generals Good Offices and other third party functions. In: Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford Scholarship; 1995. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267850.001.0001/acprof-9780198267850-chapter-6
30.
Bercovitch J. Conflict Resolution in the Twenty-First Century. University of Michigan Press; 2009. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472022182
31.
S. Ahmed LB. In Pursuit of Sustainable Peace: the Seven Deadly Sins of Mediation. Published online 2008. http://peacemaker.un.org/
32.
Boisson de Chazournes L, Kohen MG, Viñuales JE. Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9789004209985
33.
Merrills JG. International Dispute Settlement. 5th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
34.
Developments in Dispute settlement: Inter-State Arbitration since 1945. The British year book of international law. 1992;63. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg121768888&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg121768888&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=0&dum=true&frbg=&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&dstmp=1425307476866&srt=rank&vl(freeText0)=bRITISH%20YEARBOOK%20OF%20INTERNATIONAL%20LAW&vid=UCL_VU1&mode=Basic
35.
Permanent Court of Arbitration. Hague Convention for the Pacific Settlement of Disputes, 1899. Published online 1899. http://www.pca-cpa.org/
36.
UNCITRAL. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985. Published 1985. http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/1985Model_arbitration.html
37.
UN. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, Annex VII. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
38.
ICSID. ICSID Convention Arbitration Rules. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention-Arbitration-Rules.aspx
39.
Government of the Republic of Slovenia. Arbitration agreement between the government of the Republic of Slovenia and the government of the Republic fo Croatia. Published online 2009. http://www.vlada.si/fileadmin/dokumenti/si/projekti/2010/Arbitrazni_sporazum/10.a_Arbitra%C5%BEni_sporazum_-_podpisan_EN.pdf
40.
Commission O. OSPAR Convention - Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic. Published 1992. http://www.ospar.org/content/content.asp?menu=01481200000000_000000_000000
41.
PCA. Ireland-UK, Rules of procedure for the Arbitral Tribunal Constituted under the OSPAR Convention pursuant to the Request of Ireland dated 15 June 2001. Published online 2001. http://pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1158
42.
PCA. Republic of Ecuador v United States of America. http://www.pca-cpa.org/
43.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
44.
Hirsch M. The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes. In: The Arbitration Mechanism of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes. Vol International arbitration law library. M. Nijhoff; 1993.
45.
ICC. ICC Statute - Rome Statute. http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/Pages/default.aspx
46.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
47.
ICJ. ICJ Statute. http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php
48.
ICC. ICC Statute - The Rome Statute. http://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/Pages/default.aspx
49.
CCJ. Agreement establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice. http://www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org/
50.
ECHR. ECHR, Advisory opinion on certain legal questions concerning the lists of candidates submitted with a view to the election of judges to the European Court of Human Rights, 12 February 2008. Published 2008. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home&c=
51.
Council of Europe. Resolution CM/Res (2010) 26 on the establishment of an Advisory Panel of Experts on Candidates for Election as Judge to the European Court of Human Rights. Published 2010. https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1704555&Site=CM
52.
CJEU. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,. http://europa.eu/index_en.htm
53.
Court S. Speech by Lord Mance - The Composition of the European Court of Justice, 19 October 2011. Published 2011. https://www.supremecourt.uk/
54.
Sands, Philippe. Global Governance and the International Judiciary: Choosing Our Judges. Current Legal Problems. 2003;56(1). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1564009330/86A77CD95B2247DDPQ/1?accountid=14511
55.
Selecting International Judges: Principle, Process, and Politics - Oxford Scholarship. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580569.001.0001/acprof-9780199580569
56.
Limbach J. Judicial Independence: Law and Practice of Appointments to the European Court of Human Rights. Interights http://www.interights.org/jud-ind-en/index.html
57.
Mowbray A. The Consideration of Gender in the Process of Appointing Judges to the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2008;8(3):549-559. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngn012
58.
Kate Malleson. Promoting Judicial Independence in the International Courts: Lessons from the Caribbean. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2009;58(3):671-687. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25622231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
59.
Lauterpacht E. The International Lawyer as Judge. In: The International Lawyer as Practitioner. British Institute of International and Comparative Law; 2000:125-144.
60.
Elsig M, Pollack MA. Agents, trustees, and international courts: The politics of judicial appointment at the World Trade Organization. European Journal of International Relations. 2014;20(2):391-415. doi:10.1177/1354066112448201
61.
Von Bogdandy A, Venzke I. On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Authority. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2013;26(01):49-72. doi:10.1017/S0922156512000647
62.
Stephen M. Schwebel. Ad Hoc Chambers of the International Court of Justice. The American Journal of International Law. 1987;81(4):831-854. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203413?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
63.
Valencia-Ospina E. The Use of Chambers of the International Court of Justice. In: Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings. Cambridge University Press; 1996:503-527. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511560101.030
64.
Shelton D. Legal Norms for Independence and Accountability of International Tribunals. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. 2003;2(1):27-62. doi:10.1163/157180303100420186
65.
Brown C. Evolution and Application of Independence Rules of International Judiciary. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. 2003;2(1):63-96. doi:10.1163/157180303100420195
66.
Guillaume G. Some Thoughts on Independence of International Judges. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. 2003;2(1):163-168. doi:10.1163/157180303100420221
67.
de Bertodano S. Judicial Independence in the International Criminal Court. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2002;15(2):409-430. doi:10.1017/S0922156502000201
68.
Charnovitz S. Judicial Independence in the World Trade Organization. In: International Organizations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects. Transnational Publishers; 2002.
69.
Mackenzie, Ruth. International Courts and Tribunals and the Independence of the International Judge. Harvard International Law Journal. 2003;44. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=271&handle=hein.journals%2Fhilj44&collection=journals
70.
International Law Association Study Group on the Law and Procedure of International Tribunals. Burgh House Principles on the Independence of the International Judiciary. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/cict/
71.
ICTY. Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija, Appeals Chamber, Judgment of 21 July 2000. Published 21AD. http://www.icty.org/
72.
ICJ. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=5a&PHPSESSID=63fe2ddc2f12b8922fe3eff89c4e0691&case=131&code=mwp&p3=3
73.
Prosecutor v Sesay, Decision on defence motion, seeking the disqualification of Justice Robertson from the Appeals Chamber, Special Court for Sierra Leone. 13AD;16. http://www.lexisnexis.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4DN2-S820-TWP1-F0NG&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
74.
Prosecutor v Sam Hinga Norman, Decision on Preliminary Motion Based on Lack of Jurisdiction (Judicial Independence), Appeals Chamber. 13AD;3. http://www.lexisnexis.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-8V31-DYJ0-830D&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
75.
ICSID. Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26. Decision on Claimants’ Proposal to Disqualify Professor Campbell McLachlan, Arbitrator. Published 12AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/Pages/default.aspx
76.
PCA. Republic of Mauritius v United Kingdom, Reasoned Decision on Challenge to Judge Greenwood, 30 November 2011. Published 30AD. http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=363
77.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
78.
Sands, Philippe. Treaty, Custom and the Cross-fertilization of International Law. 1998;1. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yhurdvl1&div=7&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab=srchresults&terms=Sands,%20Philippe&type=matchall
79.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
80.
WTO. European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS291/R,WT/DS292/R, WT/DS293/R, Reports of the Panel, 29 September 2006. Published 29AD. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds291_e.htm
81.
WTO. United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products,DS58/AB/R, 12 October 1998. Published 12AD. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds58_e.htm
82.
World Trade Organization Appellate body: report of the Appellate Body in United States - Standards for reformulated and conventional gasoline. International Legal Materials. 1996;35(3):603-634. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20698564?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
83.
ICJ. Case Concerning the Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), ICJ Reps1997. Published 1997. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=92&code=hs&p3=4
84.
ICJ. Oil Platforms Case (Iran v US), Judgment of 6 November 2003. Published 6AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/?p1=3&p2=3&case=90&code=op&p3=4
85.
PCA. The MOX Plant Case (Ireland v United Kingdom), Annex VII Tribunal, Order of June 2003. http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=363
86.
Guyana v Suriname, Arbitral Award of 17 September 2007. http://www.pca-cpa.org/
87.
International Law Commission. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, 13 April 2006. Published 13AD. http://www.un.org/law/ilc/
88.
Teitel, Ruti. Cross-Judging: Tribunalization in a Fragmented but Interconnected Global Order. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2009;41. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=959&handle=hein.journals%2Fnyuilp41&collection=journals
89.
Pellet A. The role of the international lawyer in international litigation. In: The International Lawyer as Practitioner. British Institute of International and Comparative Law; 2000:147-162.
90.
Bowett D. The Conduct of International Litigation. In: International Court of Justice: Process, Practise and Procedure. BIICL; 1997:1-20.
91.
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Court of Justice: A Practical Perspective, The. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1997;46. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=831&handle=hein.journals%2Fincolq46&collection=journals
92.
WTO. European Communities Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, 2 August 1997, WT/DS27/AB/R, 9 September 1997. Published 9AD. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds27_e.htm
93.
ICJ. ICJ, Practice Directions VII and VIII. Published 2002. http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php?lang=en
94.
ICC. Code of Professional Conduct for Counsel, Resolution 1 of the fourth meeting of the Assembly of States Parties to the ICC Statute. http://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/default.aspx
95.
International Law Association Study Group on the Practice and Procedure of International Tribunals. The Hague Principles on Ethical Standards for Counsel appearing before International Courts and Tribunals. Published 2010. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/cict/
96.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
97.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
98.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
99.
Merrills. The Optional Clause Today. The British year book of international law. 1979;50.
100.
Merrills. The Optional Clause Revisited. The British year book of international law. 1993;64.
101.
ICJ. Speech of HE Judge Rosalyn Higgins, President of the ICJ, to the Sixth Committee of the United Nations, 31 October 2008. Published online 31AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/presscom/files/1/14841.pdf
102.
ICJ. ICJ, Fisheries Jurisdiction Case (Spain v Canada), Jurisdiction of the Court, Judgment of 4 December 1998. Published 4AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=ac&case=96&code=ec&p3=4
103.
ICJ. Application of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v Russian Federation), Judgment on Preliminary Objections, 1 April 2011. Published 1AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=1&case=140&code=GR&p3=4
104.
ICJ. Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application 2002) (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Rwanda) Judgment on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 3 February 2006. Published 3AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=19&case=126&code=crw&p3=4
105.
PCA. The Republic of Mauritius v. The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. http://pca-cpa.org/
106.
PCA. Mauritius v United Kingdom (Procedural Order No. 2) 15th of January 2013, Decision on Bifurcation (joining jurisdiction to the merits). Published 15AD. http://www.pca-cpa.org/
107.
ITLOS. ARA Libertad (Ghana v Argentina) Order of the 15th December 2012. Published 15AD. https://www.itlos.org/en/main/latest-news/
108.
ICSID. Southern Bluefin Tuna Case - Australia and New Zealand v. Japan. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/about/Pages/Southern-Bluefin-Tuna-Case---Australia-and-New-Zealand-v.-Japan.aspx
109.
ITLOS. MOX Plant Case (Ireland v. UK) ITLOS, Order of 3 Dec. 2001. Published 3AD. https://www.itlos.org/
110.
ECHR. Bankovic v. Belgium et al, Eur.Ct.H.R. Admissibility Decision, 12th Dec. 2001. Published 12AD. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
111.
ICJ. Case concerning Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, (Georgia v. Russia), Judgment on Preliminary Objections, 1 April 2011. Published 1AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=4d&case=140&code=GR&p3=4
112.
ICJ. Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation). http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=4d&case=140&code=GR&p3=1
113.
ICJ, ICJ. Oral Proceedings, CR 2010/9, 14 September 2010. Published 14AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=4d&case=140&code=GR&p3=2
114.
ICJ. Oral Proceedings, CR 2010/10, 15 September 2010. Published 15AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=4d&case=140&code=GR&p3=2
115.
ICJ. Oral Proceedings, CR 2010/11, 16 September 2010. Published 16AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=4d&case=140&code=GR&p3=2
116.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
117.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
118.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
119.
Jennings R. Reflections on the Term ‘Dispute’’. In: Essays in Honour of Wang Tieya.
120.
ICJ. Case Concerning East Timor (Portugal v. Australia) 1995 ICJ Rep. 13. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=84&code=pa&p3=4
121.
ICJ. US Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States v. Iran) 1980. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=64&code=usir&p3=4
122.
ICJ. Nuclear Tests Case (Australia v. France; New Zealand v. France) 1974. http://www.icj-cij.org/
123.
ICJ. Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (1970-1971) 1970. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=a7&case=53&code=nam&p3=4
124.
ICJ. Legality of the Use of Force (Yugoslavia v. Belgium) 1999 ICJ Rep. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=25&case=105&code=ybe&p3=3
125.
ICJ. Nottebohm Case, 1955 ICJ Reports, 4. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=5&p3=-1&y=1955
126.
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (New Application: 1962) (Belgium v. Spain) 1970, ICJ Reports 3. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=50&code=bt2&p3=4
127.
ICJ. Northern Cameroons, ICJ Rep. 1963, 15. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=289&code=cuk&p1=3&p2=3&case=48&k=1c&p3=5
128.
ICJ, Nuclear Tests (Australia v France), ICJ Rep. 1974, 327. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=78&case=58&code=af&p3=4
129.
ECHR EC of HR. ECHR, Ireland v. United Kingdom,. 25(1978). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=ICAAE77E0E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
130.
ICJ. ICJ, South West Africa cases , ICJ Rep. 1966, 6 (Ethiopia v. South Africa) (Liberia v. South Africa). Published 1966. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=5&p3=-1&y=1966
131.
ICJ. ICJ, Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (New Application: 1962) (Belgium v. Spain) 1970 ICJ Reports, 3. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=50&code=bt2&p3=4
132.
Paulsson J. Jurisdiction and Admissibility. In: Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: LIber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner. ICC Publishing; 2005. http://www.arbitration-icca.org/index.html
133.
Shany Y. Jurisdiction and Admissibility. In: Romano C, Alter KJ, Shany Y, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. First edition. Oxford University Press; 2014:779-805. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42603/chapter/357546658
134.
ICJ. Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v. France, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America) ICJ Reps 1954, 19. Published 15AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=19&code=gold&p3=4
135.
ICJ. Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru (Nauru v. Australia) ICJ Reps 1992, 240. Published 26AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=e2&case=80&code=naus&p3=4
136.
ICJ. East Timor case (Portugal v Australia), ICJ Reps 1995 , 90. Published 30AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=66&case=84&code=pa&p3=4
137.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
138.
C. M. Chinkin. Third-Party Intervention Before the International Court of Justice. The American Journal of International Law. 1986;80(3):495-531. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2201772?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
139.
Chinkin CM. Third Parties in International Law. Vol Oxford monographs in international law. Clarendon Press; 1993.
140.
Schwebel SM. Review of ‘Third parties in International Law’ by Christine Chinkin. The American Journal of International Law. 1995;89(4). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203944?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
141.
ICJ. Case concerning the Continental Shelf (Libya/Malta), Application for Permission to Intervene by Italy, 21 March 1984, 1984 ICJ Reps 3. Published 21AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=68&code=lm&p3=4
142.
ICJ. Case concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Order of 21 October 1999. Published 21AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=94&code=cn&p3=3
143.
ICJ. Case concerning Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan, Application by the Philippines for Permission to Intervene, 23 October 2001. Published 23AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=df&case=102&code=inma&p3=4
144.
ICJ. Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan, New Zealand intervening), Declaration of Intervention by New Zealand, Order of 6 February 2013 (Article 63). Published 6AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=1&case=148&code=aj&p3=3
145.
Angell E. The Amicus Curiae American Development of English Institutions. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1967;16(4):1017-1044. http://www.jstor.org/stable/756883?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
146.
Krislov S. The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy. The Yale Law Journal. 1963;72(4):694-721. http://www.jstor.org/stable/794698?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
147.
Dinah Shelton. The Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings. The American Journal of International Law. 1994;88(4):611-642. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2204133?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
148.
Mackenzie R. The Amicus Curiae in International Courts: Towards Common Procedural Approaches? In: Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies. T.M.C. Asser Press; 2005.
149.
De Brabandere, Eric. NGOs and the ‘Public Interest’: The Legality and Rationale of Amicus Curiae Interventions in International Economic and Investment Disputes. Chicago Journal of International Law. 12(1):85-113. http://search.proquest.com/docview/883133824?accountid=14511
150.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
151.
ICJ Practice Direction XII. http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/index.php?p1=4&p2=4&p3=0
152.
WTO. US-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS/58/AB/R, 12 October 1999. Published 12AD. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds58_e.htm
153.
WTO. US – Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Certain Hot Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products Originating in the UK, Report of the Appellate Body, WT/DS138/AB/R, 10 May 2000. Published 10AD. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds138_e.htm
154.
WTO. WTO, European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-containing Products – Communication from the Appellate Body, WT/DS135/9, 8 November 2000. Published 8AD. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds135_e.htm
155.
Amicus Brief Storm Highlights WTO Unease with External Transparency. Bridges. 4(9). http://www.ictsd.org/downloads/2009/03/bridges04-9.pdf
156.
Appleton, Arthur E. Amicus Curiae Submissions in the Carbon Steel Case: Another Rabbit from the Appellate Body’s Hat. Journal of International Economic Law. 2000;3. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=691&handle=hein.journals%2Fjiel3&collection=journals
157.
Marceau, Gabrielle. Practical suggestions for amicus curiae briefs before WTO adjudicating bodies. Journal of International Economic Law. 4(1):155-187. http://search.proquest.com/docview/218099523?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
158.
NAFTA. Methanex Corporation v. USA, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Third Persons to Intervene as "Amici Curiae” 15 January 2001. Published 15AD. http://www.naftaclaims.com/
159.
NAFTA. UPS v. Canada, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001 and Procedural Directions for Amicus Submissions, 4 April 2003. Published 17AD. http://www.naftaclaims.com/
160.
ICSID. Aguas Argentinas S.A., Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona, S.A .and Vivendi Universal, S.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19). Published 19AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/Pages/default.aspx
161.
Levine E. Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: The Implications of an Increase in Third-Party Participation. Berkeley Journal of International Law. 2011;29(1):200-224. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bsu&AN=60706503&site=ehost-live&scope=site
162.
Amerasinghe C. Evidence in International Litigation. Martinus Nijhoff; 2005.
163.
Highet K. Evidence and Proof of Facts. In: The International Court of Justice at a Crossroads. Transnational Publishers; 1987:355-375.
164.
May, Richard. Trends in International Criminal Evidence: Nuremberg, Tokyo, The Hague, and Arusha. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 1998;37. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=725&handle=hein.journals%2Fcjtl37&collection=journals
165.
Plant B. Evidence before the International Court of Justice. BIICL; 2009.
166.
Gattini, Andrea. Evidentiary Issues in the ICJ’s Genocide Judgment. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2007;5. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=889&handle=hein.journals%2Fjicj5&collection=journals
167.
Cheng B. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. Vol Grotius classic reprint series. Cambridge University Press; 1994.
168.
Grando, Michelle T. Allocating the Burden of Proof in WTO Disputes: A Critical Analysis. Journal of International Economic Law. 9(3). http://search.proquest.com/docview/218087369?accountid=14511
169.
Keith Highet. Evidence, the Court, and the Nicaragua Case. The American Journal of International Law. 1987;81(1):1-56. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2202130?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
170.
Kazazi M. Burden of Proof and Related Issues – A Study on Evidence Before International Tribunals. Kluwer Law International; 1996.
171.
Kokott J. The Burden of Proof in Comparative and International Human Rights Law: Civil and Common Law Approaches with Special Reference to the American and German Legal Systems. Vol Studies and materials on the settlement of international disputes. Kluwer Law International; 1998.
172.
Lillich RB. Fact-Finding before International Tribunals. Transnational publications; 1991.
173.
May R, Wierda M. International Criminal Evidence. Transnational Publishers; 2002.
174.
Sandifer DV. Evidence before International Tribunals. Vol Procedural aspects of international law series. Rev. ed. University Press of Virginia; 1975.
175.
Wald, Patricia M. To Establish Incredible Events by Credible Evidence: The Use of Affidavit Testimony in Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal Proceedings. Harvard International Law Journal. 2001;42. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=535&handle=hein.journals%2Fhilj42&collection=journals
176.
ICJ. Case concerning Oil Platforms (Iran v US), Judgment of 6 November 2003. Published 6AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/?p1=3&p2=3&case=90&code=op&p3=4
177.
ICJ. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007,. Published 26AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=91&p3=4
178.
ICJ. Case concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment of 19 December 2005. Published 19AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=51/&case=116&code=co&p3=4
179.
ICTY. Prosecutor v. Brdanin, Trial Chamber Judgment of 1 September 2004. Published 1AD. http://www.icty.org/sid/8368
180.
ECHR. Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria, Judgment of 6 July 2005. Published 6AD. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
181.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras, Judgment of July 29, 1988. Published 29AD. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/index.php/en
182.
ICJ. Case Concerning Paramilitary Activities In and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United. Published 27AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/?p1=3&p2=3&case=70&code=nus&p3=4
183.
ICJ. Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Dicrimination (Georgia v Russian Federation) Judgment of the 1st April 2011. Published 1AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=1&case=140&code=GR&p3=4
184.
ICJ. Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v Japan, New Zealand intervening). Published 31AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=1&case=148&code=aj&p3=5
185.
ICTY. Prosecutor v. Tadic, Appeals Chamber Judgment of 15 July 1999,. Published 15AD. http://www.icty.org/case/tadic/4
186.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
187.
Rosenne S. Provisional Measures in International Law. Oxford Scholarship; 2005. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268061.001.0001/acprof-9780199268061
188.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
189.
Collins L. Interim measures in International Tribunals. In: Essays in International Litigation and the Conflict of Laws. Clarendon Press; 1993:214-233.
190.
J. G. Merrills. Interim Measures of Protection in the Recent Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1995;44(1):90-146. http://www.jstor.org/stable/760861
191.
ICJ. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina v Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)), Order of 8 April 1993. Published 8AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=f4&case=91&code=bhy&p3=3
192.
ITLOS. Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (Australia and New Zealand v Japan), Order of 27 August 1999. Published 27AD. http://www.itlos.org/en/cases/list-of-cases/case-no-3-4/
193.
ITLOS. MOX Plant case (Ireland v UK), Order of 3 December 2001. Published 3AD. http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=102
194.
ICJ. Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay), Order of 13 July 2006, Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures. Published 13AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=135&code=au&p3=3
195.
ICJ. Request for interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) (Cambodia v. Thailand). Published 18AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=1&k=89&case=151&code=ct2&p3=3
196.
ICJ. La Grand Case (Germany v USA), Order of 3 March 1999. Published 3AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=104&code=gus&p3=3
197.
ICJ. La Grand Case (Germany v USA), Judgment of 27 June 2001. Published 27AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=104&code=gus&p3=4
198.
ECHR. Mamatkulov and Askarov v Turkey, Judgment of 4 February 2005. Published 4AD. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
199.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
200.
Brown C. Remedies in International Adjudication. In: A Common Law of International Adjudication. OUP; 2007. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206506.001.0001/acprof-9780199206506-chapter-7
201.
Gray C. Chapter 40: Remedies. In: Romano C, Alter KJ, Shany Y, eds. The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. First edition. Oxford University Press; 2014:871-898. https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42603/chapter/357546675
202.
Gray CD. International Arbitral practice. In: International Arbitral Practice. Clarenden; 1990. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254324.001.0001/acprof-9780198254324-chapter-2
203.
ILC. International Law Commission - Articles on State Responsibility. Published 2001. http://www.un.org/law/ilc/
204.
Schultz C. Compliance with Decisions of the International Court of Justice - Oxford Scholarship. Oxford University Press; 2004. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276721.001.0001/acprof-9780199276721
205.
Llamzon A. Jurisdiction and Compliance in Recent Decisions of the International Court of Justice. European Journal of International Law. 2007;18:815-852. http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/18/5/250.pdf
206.
ICJ. La Grand Case (Germany v US). http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=104&code=gus&p3=1
207.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Advisory Opinion of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the Right to Information on Consular Assistance in the Framework of the Guarantees of the Due Process of Law, Advisory Opinion OC-16/99 of October 1, 1999 Requested by the United Mexican States, Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Published online 1AD. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_16_ing.pdf
208.
ICJ. Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium),. Published 14AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=121&p3=4
209.
Mackenzie R, Romano C, Shany Y, Sands P. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2010.
210.
Brown C. Power of International Courts to Interpret and Revise Judgments and Awards. A Common Law of International Adjudication. Published 2007. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206506.001.0001/acprof-9780199206506-chapter-6
211.
ICJ. Application for Revision and Interpretation of the Judgment of 24th Feb. 1982 in the Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia/Libya) 10 December 1985. Published 10AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=05&case=71&code=tltl&p3=4
212.
ICJ. Application for Revision of the Judgment in the Genocide Case, Judgment of 3 February 2003. Published 3AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3cari&k=8d&PHPSESSID=d8ad9d6013d807680991459a0b88d6f8&case=122&code=ybh&p3=4
213.
ICJ. Case concerning the Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v. Belgium), Judgment of 15 December 2004. Published 15AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=d6&case=105&code=ybe&p3=4
214.
ICJ. Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 11th June 1998 in the Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria, Judgment of 25 March 1999. Published 25AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=52&case=101&code=nc&p3=4
215.
The Courts of British Columbia. United Mexican States v. Metalclad, 2001 BCSC 664. Published 2AD. http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/
216.
ECHR. Hatton and Others v. United Kingdom, European Court of Human Rights, 8 July 2003. Published 8AD. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
217.
WTO. Understanding on rules and procedures governing the settlement of disputes. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dsu_e.htm
218.
ICSID. ICSID Convention. Published 14AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/icsiddocs/Pages/ICSID-Convention.aspx
219.
Caron D. Reputation and Reality in the ICSID Annulment Process: Understanding the Distinction between Annulment and Appeal. ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal. 7(1):21-56. http://icsidreview.oxfordjournals.org/content/7/1.toc
220.
Schreuer C. From ICSID Annulment to Appeal Half Way Down the Slippery Slope. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. 2011;10(2):211-225. doi:10.1163/157180311X582125
221.
ICSID. CMS Gas Transmission Company v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007. Published 25AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/cases/Pages/casedetail.aspx?CaseNo=ARB/01/8&tab=DOC
222.
ICSID. Enron Corp. Ponderosa Asset, L.P. v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 30 July 2010. Published online 30AD. http://italaw.com/documents/EnronAnnulmentDecision.pdf
223.
ICSID. Sempra Energy Int’l v Argentine Republic, ICSID (W. Bank) Case No. ARB/02/16, Decision on Argentine Republic’s Request for Annulment of the Award, June 2010. Published 29AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/cases/Pages/casedetail.aspx?CaseNo=ARB/02/16&tab=DOC
224.
ICSID. Secretariat, Background Paper on Annulment for the Administrative Council of ICSID, August 10, 2012. Published 10AD. https://icsid.worldbank.org/apps/ICSIDWEB/resources/Pages/Background-Papers.aspx
225.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The Settlement of Disputes in International Law: Institutions and Procedures. Oxford University Press; 1999.
226.
ICJ. Legal Consequences Of The Construction Of A Wall In The Occupied Palestinian Territory, ICJ, Advisory Opinion, 9 July. Published 9AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&code=mwp&p3=4
227.
ICJ. Western Sahara, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1975. Published 16AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=61&code=sa&p3=4
228.
ICJ. Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict ICJ, 8 July 1996. Published 8AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=e1&case=93&code=anw&p3=4
229.
ICJ. Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010. Published 22AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=141&p3=4
230.
Roberto Ago. ‘Binding’ Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice. The American Journal of International Law. 1991;85(3):439-451. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203106?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
231.
ITLOS. Request for Advisory Opinion from the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission, 27 March 2013. Published 27AD. https://www.itlos.org/en/cases/list-of-cases/
232.
ECHR. Decision on the Competence of the Court to Give an Advisory Opinion ECtHR, 2 June 2004. Published 2AD. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=caselaw&c=#n1347456340010_pointer
233.
IACHR. Other Treaties’ subject to the consultative jurisdiction of the Court (art. 64 of the American Convention on Human Rights) Advisory Opinion OC-1/82, 24 September 1982. Published 24AD. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/index.php/en/advisory-opinions
234.
ICJ. Speech of President Guillaume to the Sixth Committee of UN General Assembly, October 2000. http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?pr=85&pt=3&p1=1&p2=3&p3=1
235.
New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 1999;31(4). http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fnyuilp&collection=journals
236.
Hague Academy of International Law. Is International Law Threatened by Multiple International Tribunals?,. Recueil des cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye: Collected courses of the Hague Academy of International L. 1998;271.
237.
Rosalyn Higgins. A Babel of Judicial Voices? Ruminations from the Bench. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006;55(4):791-804. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092619?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
238.
Shany Y. Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals. Oxford Scholarship; 2004. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274284.001.0001/acprof-9780199274284
239.
Webb P. International Judicial Integration and Fragmentation. Vol International courts and tribunals series. First edition. Oxford University Press; 2013. doi:10.1093/law/9780199671151.001.0001
240.
ICJ. Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal). Published 20AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&case=144&code=bs&p3=4
241.
PCA. The MOX Plant case (Ireland v United Kingdom), Order No. 3, Suspension of Proceedings on Jurisdiction and Merits, and Request for Further Provisional Measures, 24 June 2003. Published 24AD. http://www.pcacases.com/
242.
PCA. The MOX Plant case (Ireland v United Kingdom), Order No. 4, Further Suspension of Proceedings on Jurisdiction and Merits, 14 November 2003. Published 14AD. http://www.pcacases.com/
243.
European Court of Justice. Commission v Ireland, Case C-459/03, Judgment of the Court of 30 May 2006. Published 30AD. http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/
