1.
Arnold, Dean E. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
2.
Barley, Nigel. Smashing pots: works of clay from Africa. London: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1994.
3.
Berg, Ina, International Conference on Prehistoric Ceramics, Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Breaking the mould: challenging the past through pottery. Vol. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2008.
4.
Lange, Frederick W., Bishop, Ronald L. The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: University Press of Colorado; 1991.
5.
Gaimster, David R. M., Freestone, Ian. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: British Museum Press; 1997.
6.
Gibson, Alex M., Woods, A. J. Prehistoric pottery for the archaeologist. Leicester: Leicester University Press; 1990.
7.
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
8.
Peacock, D. P. S. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1982.
9.
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
10.
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 1. Function, Style, and Origins. Journal of Archaeological Research [Internet]. 1996;4(2):133–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053114
11.
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research [Internet]. 1996;4(3):165–202. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053131
12.
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Vol. Manuals on archeology. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum; 1981.
13.
Shimada, Izumi. Craft production in complex societies: multicraft and producer perspectives. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2007.
14.
Scarcella, Simona. Archaeological ceramics: a review of current research. Vol. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2011.
15.
Sinopoli, Carla M. Approaches to archaeological ceramics. New York: Plenum Press; 1991.
16.
Feinman, Gary M., Skibo, James M. Pottery and people: a dynamic interaction. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1999.
17.
Miriam T. Stark. Current Issues in Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research [Internet]. 2003;11(3):193–242. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053198
18.
M. S. Tite. Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1999;6(3):181–233. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177403
19.
Tyers, Paul. Roman pottery in Britain. London: Batsford; 1996.
20.
Pritchard, Alison C., Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der. The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Vol. Cingula. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam; 1984.
21.
Di Pierro, S., Serneels, Vincent, Maggetti, Marino, European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics. Ceramic in the society: proceedings of the 6th European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics, Fribourg, Swtizerland 3-6 October 2001. Fribourg: Department of Geosciences, Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Fribourg; 2003.
22.
Prudêncio, M. Isabel, Dias, M. Isabel, Waerenborgh, J. C., European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics. Understanding people through their pottery: proceedings of the 7th European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics (EMAC’03) : October 27-31, 2003 : Instituto Tecnológico e Nuclear, Lisbon, Portugal. Vol. Trabalhos de arqueologia. Lisboa: Instituto Português de Arqueologia; 2005.
23.
Welcome to the PCRG [Internet]. Available from: http://www.pcrg.org.uk/
24.
Medieval Pottery Research Group [Internet]. Available from: http://www.medievalpottery.org.uk/
25.
Roman Pottery in Britain [Internet]. Available from: http://potsherd.net/atlas/publications
26.
ArchNet: Ceramic Attribute Glossary [Internet]. Available from: http://archnet.asu.edu/archives/ceramic/hgloss/hgloss.html
27.
The Alan Vince Archaeological Consultancy [Internet]. Available from: http://www.postex.demon.co.uk/
28.
Van der Leeuw SE, Pritchard AC. Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam; 1984. p. 707–73.
29.
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Vol. Manuals on archeology. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum; 1981.
30.
Abbink, Albertine Alie. Make it and break it: the cycles of pottery : a study of the technology, form, function, and use of pottery from the settlements at Uitgeest-Groot Dorregeest and Schagen-Muggenburg 1, Roman period, North Holland, the Netherlands. Vol. Archaeological studies Leiden University. Leiden: Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University; 1999.
31.
Nordström, Hans-Åke, Arnold, Dorothea, Bourriau, Janine, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. An Introduction to ancient Eqyptian pottery. Vol. Sonderschrift / Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. Abteilung Kairo. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern; 1993.
32.
Atkin, Jacqui. Handbuilt pottery techniques revealed: the secrets of handbuilding shown in unique cutaway photography. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Barron’s Educational Series; 2004.
33.
Barrett JC. Bronze Age Pottery and Problems of Classification. In: Papers on the prehistoric archaeology of Cranborne Chase [Internet]. Oxford: Oxbow; 1991. p. 201–31. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d5c87a22-b105-e811-80cd-005056af4099
34.
Gibson, Alex M. Prehistoric pottery in Britain & Ireland. Stroud: Tempus; 2002.
35.
Gibson AM, Woods AJ. Prehistoric pottery for the archaeologist. Leicester: Leicester University Press; 1990.
36.
Hamer, Frank, Hamer, Janet. The potter’s dictionary of materials and techniques. 3rd ed. London: A & C Black; 1991.
37.
Kempton, Willett. The folk classification of ceramics: a study of cognitive prototypes. Vol. Language, thought, and culture. New York: Academic Press; 1981.
38.
Miller, Daniel. Artefacts as categories: a study of ceramic variability in central India. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
39.
Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. The study of later prehistoric pottery: general policies and guidelines for analysis and publication [Internet]. Vol. Occasional paper / Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Oxford: Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group; 1995. Available from: http://www.pcrg.org.uk/News_pages/PCRG%20Gudielines%203rd%20Edition%20%282010%29.pdf
40.
Read, Dwight W. Artifact classification: a conceptual and methodological approach. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2007.
41.
Van der Leeuw SE, Longacre WA. Variation, Variability and Explanation in Pottery Studies. In: Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 1991. p. 11–39.
42.
Hill, J. D., Woodward, Ann, Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Vol. Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. occasional publication. Oxford: Oxbow; 2002.
43.
ArchNet: Ceramic Attribute Glossary [Internet]. Available from: http://archnet.asu.edu/archives/ceramic/hgloss/hgloss.html
44.
Welcome to the PCRG [Internet]. Available from: http://www.pcrg.org.uk/
45.
Livingston-Smith A, Gosselain OP. The Source: Clay Selection and processing practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Pottery manufacturing processes: reconstitution and interpretation [Internet]. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2005. p. 33–47. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4745472b-9636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
46.
Pollard AM, Heron C. The geochemistry of clays and provenance of ceramics. In: Archaeological chemistry [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2008. p. 104–48. Available from: http://www.ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1185179
47.
Barley, Nigel. Smashing pots: works of clay from Africa. London: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1994.
48.
Colbeck, John. Pottery materials: their composition, preparation and use. London: Batsford; 1988.
49.
Grimshaw, Rex W., Searle, Alfred B. The chemistry and physics of clays and allied ceramic materials. 4th ed. rev. New York: Wiley-Interscience;
50.
Hamer, Frank, Hamer, Janet. The potter’s dictionary of materials and techniques. 3rd ed. London: A & C Black; 1991.
51.
Pollard, A. M., Heron, Carl, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2008.
52.
Rice PM. Properties of Clays I: the Clay/Water System. In: Pottery analysis: a sourcebook [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987. p. 54–79. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a23370dd-0505-e811-80cd-005056af4099
53.
Sillar B. The Dead and the Drying: Techniques for Transforming People and Things in the Andes. Journal of Material Culture. 1996 Nov 1;1(3):259–89.
54.
Smith AL. Processing clay for pottery in Northern Cameroon: social and technical requirements. Archaeometry. 2000 Feb;42(1):21–42.
55.
Tobert N. Ethno-archaeology of pottery firing in Darfur, Sudan: implications for ceramic technology studies. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 1984 Jul;3(2):141–56.
56.
Velde, B. Introduction to clay minerals: chemistry, orgins, uses and environmental significance. London: Chapman & Hall; 1992.
57.
Woodward A. Inclusions, Impressions and Interpretations. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis [Internet]. Oxford: Oxbow; 2002. p. 106–18. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9ca597f2-8136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
58.
Worrall, W. E. Clays and ceramic raw materials. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1986.
59.
Van der Leeuw S. Giving the potter a choice: conceptual aspects of pottery techniques. In: Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1993. p. 238–88. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5fcca5c0-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
60.
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Vol. Manuals on archeology. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum; 1981.
61.
Nordström, Hans-Åke, Arnold, Dorothea, Bourriau, Janine, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. An Introduction to ancient Eqyptian pottery. Vol. Sonderschrift / Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. Abteilung Kairo. Mainz am Rhein: P. von Zabern; 1993.
62.
Brandt, R. W., Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der, Groenman-Van Waateringe, Willy. Assendelver Polder papers. Vol. Cingula. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, Albert Egges van Giffen Instituut voor Prae- en Protohistorie; 1987.
63.
Courty MA, Roux V. Identification of wheel throwing on the basis of ceramic surface features and microfabrics. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1995 Jan;22(1):17–50.
64.
Nicholas David, Judy Sterner and Kodzo Gavua. Why Pots are Decorated. Current Anthropology [Internet]. 1988;29(3):365–89. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2743453
65.
Livingstone-Smith, Alexandre, Bosquet, Dominique, International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences. Pottery manufacturing processes: reconstitution and interpretation. Vol. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress; 2005.
66.
Helen L. Loney. Society and Technological Control: A Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies. American Antiquity [Internet]. 2000;65(4):646–68. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694420
67.
Mahias MC. Pottery Techniques in India: Technical variants and social choice. In: Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: Routledge; 1993.
68.
Shaw, Ian, Nicholson, Paul T. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
69.
Rice PM. Pottery Manufacturing Technology: an Ethnographic Overview. In: Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987. p. 113–67.
70.
Sillar B, Tite MS. The challenge of ‘technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry. 2000 Feb;42(1):2–20.
71.
Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der. Studies in the technology of ancient pottery. Amsterdam]: [University of Amsterdam];
72.
Vandiver PB. The implications of variation in ceramic technology: the forming of Neolithic storage vessels in China and the Near East. Archeomaterials. 1986;2:139–74.
73.
Gosselain OP. Bonfire of the enquiries. Pottery firing temperatures in archaeology: What for? Journal of Archaeological Science. 1992 May;19(3):243–59.
74.
Livingstone Smith A. Bonfire II: The Return of Pottery Firing Temperatures. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2001 Sep;28(9):991–1003.
75.
Adan-Bayewitz D, Wieder M. Ceramics from Roman Galilee: A Comparison of Several Techniques for Fabric Characterization. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1992 Jan 1;19(2):189–205.
76.
Heimann RB. Firing Technologies and Their Possible Assessment by Modern Analytic Methods. In: Archaeological ceramics. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1982. p. 89–98.
77.
Magetti M. Phase analysis and its significance for technology and origin. In: Archaeological ceramics. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1982. p. 121–34.
78.
Johnson JS, Clark J, Miller-Antonio S, Robins D, Schiffer MB, Skibo JM. Effects of firing temperature on the fate of naturally occurring organic matter in clays. Journal of Archaeological Science. 1988 Jul;15(4):403–14.
79.
Paynter S, Tite M. The evolution of Glazing Technologies in the Ancient Near East and Egypt. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 BC : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000 [Internet]. Oxford: Oxbow; 2001. p. 239–54. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw299c.17?refreqid=excelsior:61792d10245991fb8515172c2da5d173&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
80.
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
81.
Rice, Prudence M., American Ceramic Society. The prehistory & history of ceramic kilns. Vol. Ceramics and civilization. Westerville, Ohio: The American Ceramic Society; 1997.
82.
Robinson AM. Three approaches to the problem of pottery fabric description. Medieval ceramics [Internet]. 1979;3:3–35. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7f652d4e-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
83.
Owen RS. Firing. In: Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: Taraxacum; 1981. p. 96–122.
84.
SILLAR B. Dung by preference: the choice of fuel as an example of how Andean pottery production is embedded within wider technical, social and economic practices. Archaeometry. 2000 Feb;42(1):43–60.
85.
Swan, Vivien G. The pottery kilns of Roman Britain. Vol. Royal Commission on Historical Monuments supplementary series. London: H.M.S.O.; 1984.
86.
Tite MS. Firing temperature determinations - how and why? In: The aim of laboratory analyses of ceramics in archaeology, April 7-9, 1995 in Lund, Sweden. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets historie och antikvitets akademien; 1995. p. 37–42.
87.
Tomber, R., Dore, John, English Heritage, British Museum, National Roman Fabric Reference Collection, Museum of London. The National Roman Fabric Reference Collection: a handbook. Vol. MoLAS monograph. London: Museum of London Archaeology Service; 1998.
88.
Prudêncio, M. Isabel, Dias, M. Isabel, Waerenborgh, J. C., European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics. Understanding people through their pottery: proceedings of the 7th European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics (EMAC’03) : October 27-31, 2003 : Instituto Tecnológico e Nuclear, Lisbon, Portugal. Vol. Trabalhos de arqueologia. Lisboa: Instituto Português de Arqueologia; 2005.
89.
Patricia L. Crown. Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology. American Antiquity [Internet]. 2007;72(4):677–90. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25470440
90.
Karen G. Harry. Ceramic Specialization and Agricultural Marginality: Do Ethnographic Models Explain the Development of Specialized Pottery Production in the Prehistoric American Southwest? American Antiquity [Internet]. 2005;70(2):295–319. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035705
91.
Arnold, Dean E. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
92.
Arnold, Dean E. Social change and the evolution of ceramic production and distribution in a Maya community. Vol. Mesoamerican worlds. Boulder: University Press of Colorado; 2008.
93.
Hoopes, John W., Barnett, William. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Washington [D.C.]: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1995.
94.
Clark JE. Craft specialization as an archaeological category. Research in economic anthropology [Internet]. 1995;16:267–94. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c84dfee2-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
95.
Cathy Lynne Costin. Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production. Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1991;3:1–56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170212
96.
Day PM, Wilson EE. Reassessing specialization in pre- palatial Cretan ceramic production. Aegaeum: annales d’archéologie égéenne de l’Université de Liège, 6. 1990;16:275–90.
97.
Franken, H. J., Kalsbeek, J. Potters of a medieval village in the Jordan Valley: excavations at Tell deir ʻAllā--a medieval tell, Tell Abu Gourdan, Jordan. Vol. North-Holland ceramic studies in archaeology. Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co; 1975.
98.
Hirth K. Housework and Domestic Craft Production: An Introduction. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association. 2009 Dec 14;19(1):1–12.
99.
Hagstrum MB. Measuring Prehistoric Ceramic Craft Specialization: a Test Case in the American Southwest. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1985 Jan 1;12(1):65–75.
100.
Jordan, Peter, Zvelebil, Marek. Ceramics before farming: the dispersal of pottery among prehistoric Eurasian hunter-gatherers. Vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press; 2009.
101.
London GA. Response to Melissa Hagstrum, ‘Measuring Prehistoric Cereamic Craft specialization: a Test Case in the American Southwest’. News and Short Contributions [Internet]. 1986;4(13):510–1. Available from: http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/maney/00934690/v13n4/s8.pdf?expires=1362667909&id=73208045&titleid=75005571&accname=UCL%20LIBRARY&checksum=B7F0091C972565DF37CCB4A04EAF21BE
102.
McGovern, Patrick E., Notis, M. D., American Ceramic Society. Cross-craft and cross-cultural interactions in ceramics. Vol. Ceramics and civilization. Westerville, OH: American Ceramic Society; 1989.
103.
Peacock, D. P. S. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1982.
104.
David A. Phillips Jr. Comment on Harry’s Discussion of Ceramic Specialization and Agricultural Marginality in the Prehistoric U.S. Southwest. American Antiquity [Internet]. 2006;71(2):397–8. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035911
105.
Rautman M. Handmade Pottery and Social Change: the view from Late Roman Cyprus. Journal of Mediterranean archaeology. 11(1):81–104.
106.
Rice PM. Specialization, Standardization and Diversity: a retrospective. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O Shepard. Niwot, Colo: University Press of Colorado; 1991. p. 257–79.
107.
Shimada, Izumi. Craft production in complex societies: multicraft and producer perspectives. Vol. Foundations of archaeological inquiry. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 2007.
108.
Sillar B. Reputable pots and disreputable potters: individual and community choice in present-day pottery production and exchange in the Andes. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: Oxbow; 1997. p. 1–20.
109.
Anne P. Underhill. Investigating Variation in Organization of Ceramic Production: An Ethnoarchaeological Study in Guizhou, China. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 2003;10(3):203–75. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177480
110.
Orton C. Production and Distribution. In: Pottery in archaeology [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1de25815-acff-e811-80cd-005056af4099
111.
Carl Knappett, Vassilis Kilikoglou, Val Steele and Ben Stern. The Circulation and Consumption of Red Lustrous Wheelmade Ware: Petrographic, Chemical and Residue Analysis. Anatolian Studies [Internet]. 2005;55:25–59. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20065534
112.
Dean E. Arnold, Hector Neff and Ronald L. Bishop. Compositional Analysis and ‘Sources’ of Pottery: An Ethnoarcheological Approach. American Anthropologist [Internet]. 1991;93(1):70–90. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/681474
113.
Samuel V. Connell. Getting Closer to the Source: Using Ethnoarchaeology to Find Ancient Pottery Making in the Naco Valley, Honduras. Latin American Antiquity [Internet]. 2002;13(4):401–17. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/972223
114.
Ian Hodder. Regression Analysis of Some Trade and Marketing Patterns. World Archaeology [Internet]. 1974;6(2):172–89. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124001
115.
Howard, Hilary, Morris, Elaine L., Technology and Trade colloquium. Production and distribution: a ceramic viewpoint. Oxford: B.A.R.; 1981.
116.
Lyne, M. A. B., Jefferies, R. S., Council for British Archaeology. The Alice Holt/Farnham Roman pottery industry [Internet]. Vol. CBA research report. London: The Council of British Archaeology; 1979. Available from: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr30.cfm?CFID=1673083&CFTOKEN=72201017&
117.
Morris EL, Woodward A. Ceramic Petrology and Prehistoric Pottery in the UK. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 69:279–303.
118.
Parker-Pearson M. The production and distribution of Bronze Age pottery in South-Western Britain. Cornish Archaeology [Internet]. 1990;29:5–32. Available from: http://cornisharchaeology.org.uk/journals/No.29_1990.pdf
119.
Peacock, D. P. S., Williams, D. F. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. Vol. Longman archaeology series. London: Longman; 1986.
120.
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
121.
M. S. Tite. Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1999;6(3):181–233. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177403
122.
Bey, George J., Pool, Christopher A. Pottery economics in Mesoamerica. Tucson: University of Arizona Press; 2007.
123.
Tomber, R., Dore, John, English Heritage, British Museum, National Roman Fabric Reference Collection, Museum of London. The National Roman Fabric Reference Collection: a handbook. Vol. MoLAS monograph. London: Museum of London Archaeology Service; 1998.
124.
Tyers, Paul. Roman pottery in Britain. London: Batsford; 1996.
125.
Wilson L, Pollard AM. The Provenance hypothesis. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences [Internet]. Chichester: John Wiley; 2001. p. 508–17. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c39eb5b5-5736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
126.
Allison PM. Why do excavation reports have finds’ catalogues? In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology [Internet]. Oxford: Oxbow; 1997. p. 77–84. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=13a963f1-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
127.
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
128.
Aimers JJ. The curse of the Ware: using ceramic systems in Belize. In: Archaeological investigations in the eastern Maya lowlands: papers of the 2003 Belize Archaeology Symposium. Belmopan, Belize: Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of Culture and History; 2004.
129.
Barrett JC. Bronze Age Pottery and Problems of Classification. In: Papers on the prehistoric archaeology of Cranborne Chase. Oxford: Oxbow; 1991. p. 201–31.
130.
Brooks A. A hierarchy of servitude: ceramics at Lake Innes Estate, New South Wales. Connah G, editor. Antiquity [Internet]. 2007;81(311):133–47. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217542954?accountid=14511
131.
English Heritage. Management of research projects in the Historic Environment [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/publications/publicationsNew/guidelines-standards/morphe-project-managers-guide/morphe-project-managers-guide-1.1-2009.pdf
132.
Gibson, Alex M., Woods, A. J. Prehistoric pottery for the archaeologist. 2nd ed. London: Leicester University Press; 1997.
133.
Willis, Steven, Hingley, Richard. Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2007.
134.
Institute of Field Archaeologists. Standard and guidance for the collection, documentation, conservation and research of archaeological materials [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/files/node-files/ifa_standards_materials.pdf
135.
Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. The study of later prehistoric pottery: general policies [Internet]. Vol. Occasional paper / Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group; 1991. Available from: http://www.pcrg.org.uk/News_pages/PCRG%20Gudielines%203rd%20Edition%20%282010%29.pdf
136.
Symonds, R. P., Wade, Sue, Roper, Andrew, Bird, Joanna, Bidwell, Paul T., Croom, Alexandra, et al. Roman pottery from excavations in Colchester, 1971-86 [Internet]. Vol. Colchester archaeological report. Colchester: Colchester Archaeological Trust; 1999. Available from: http://cat.essex.ac.uk/reports/CAR-report-0010.pdf
137.
Wheat JB. Ceramic Classification: Bradfield and Shepard, Types and Varieties. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O Shepard. Niwot, Colo: University Press of Colorado; 1991. p. 121–31.
138.
Whitbread IK. A proposal for the systematic description of thin sections towards the study of ancient ceramic technology. In: Archaeometry: proceedings of the 25th international symposium [Internet]. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1989. p. 127–38. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1902c95-1205-e811-80cd-005056af4099
139.
Berg, Ina. The meanings of standardisation: conical cups in the late Bronze Age Aegean. Antiquity [Internet]. 2004;78:74–85. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217584226?accountid=14511
140.
Goulder J. Administrators’ bread: an experiment-based re-assessment of the functional and cultural role of the Uruk bevel-rim bowl. Antiquity [Internet]. 2010;84:351–62. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/504814319?accountid=14511
141.
David Wengrow. The Evolution of Simplicity: Aesthetic Labour and Social Change in the Neolithic Near East. World Archaeology [Internet]. 2001;33(2):168–88. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/827897
142.
Brown D. Pottery and manners. In: Consuming passions: dining from antiquity to the eighteenth century. Stroud: Tempus; 2005. p. 87–100.
143.
Charters S, Evershed RP, Goad LJ, Et al. Quantification and distribution of Lipid in archaeological cermaics: implications for sampling potsherds for organic residue analysis and the classification of vessel use. Archaeometry. 1993 Aug;35(2):211–23.
144.
Tite MS, Kilikoglou V, Vekinis G. Strength, Toughness and Thermal Shock Resistance of Ancient Ceramics, and Their Influence On Technological Choice. Archaeometry. 2001 Aug;43(3):301–24.
145.
Allison, Penelope Mary. Pompeian households: an analysis of the material culture. Vol. Monograph. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at University of California, Los Angeles; 2004.
146.
John W. Arthur. Pottery Use-Alteration as an Indicator of Socioeconomic Status: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of the Gamo of Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 2002;9(4):331–55. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177467?seq=1
147.
Biddulph E. Last orders: choosing pottery for funerals in Roman Essex. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 2005 Feb;24(1):23–45.
148.
Bollong C A. Analysis of Site Stratigraphy and Formation Processes Using Patterns of Pottery Sherd Dispersion. Journal of Field Archaeology. 1994;21(1).
149.
Cathy Lynne Costin and Timothy Earle. Status Distinction and Legitimation of Power as Reflected in Changing Patterns of Consumption in Late Prehispanic Peru. American Antiquity [Internet]. 1989;54(4):691–714. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/280677
150.
Deal M, Hagstrum MB. Ceramic reuse behavior among the Maya and Wanka: Implications for Archaeology. In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press; 1995. p. 111–25.
151.
David Frankel and Jennifer M. Webb. Population, Households, and Ceramic Consumption in a Prehistoric Cypriot Village. Journal of Field Archaeology [Internet]. 2001;28(1):115–29. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3181462
152.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983 Jun;2(2):117–63.
153.
Carl Heron and Richard P. Evershed. The Analysis of Organic Residues and the Study of Pottery Use. Archaeological Method and Theory [Internet]. 1993;5:247–84. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170233
154.
Hill JN. Pueblo: Patterns of form and function. In: New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: Aldine; 1968. p. 103–42.
155.
Schiffer MB. Formation Processes of Broken K Pueblo: Some Hypotheses. In: Quantifying diversity in archaeology [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989. p. 37–58. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=add23b3e-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
156.
T. J. Wilkinson. Extensive Sherd Scatters and Land-Use Intensity: Some Recent Results. Journal of Field Archaeology [Internet]. 1989;16(1):31–46. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/529879
157.
Rouillard SE. The Iron Age Pottery from Meare Village East. In: Somerset Levels papers [Internet]. Cambridge: Somerset Levels Project; 1987. p. 183–221. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e8fa7103-7606-e811-80cd-005056af4099
158.
Coles, J. M., Minnitt, Stephen, Somerset Levels Project, Somerset County Museums Service. ‘Industrious and fairly civilized’: the Glastonbury Lake Village. [Somerset]: Somerset Levels Project and Somerset County Council Museums Service; 1995.
159.
Cunliffe, Barry W. Iron Age communities in Britain: an account of England, Scotland and Wales from the seventh century BC until the Roman conquest. 4th ed. London: Routledge; 2005.
160.
Cunliffe, Barry W., Brown, Lisa, Ambrose, Tim, Council for British Archaeology. Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire [Internet]. Vol. CBA research report. London: Council for British Archaeology; 1984. Available from: http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr73b.cfm
161.
Gibson, Alex M. Prehistoric pottery in Britain & Ireland. Stroud: Tempus; 2002.
162.
Moore T. Perceiving communities: Exchange, landscapes and social networks in the later Iron Age of Western Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 2007 Feb;26(1):79–102.
163.
Orme BJ, Coles JM, Sturdy CR. Meare Lake Village West: a report on recent work. In: Somerset Levels papers [Internet]. Cambridge: Somerset Levels Project; 1979. p. 6–17. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ca13ba0c-7906-e811-80cd-005056af4099
164.
Peacock DPS. A petrological Study of Certain Iron Age Pottery from Western England. In: Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. London: Prehistoric Society; 1968. p. 414–27.
165.
Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. The study of later prehistoric pottery: general policies [Internet]. Vol. Occasional paper / Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group; 1991. Available from: http://www.pcrg.org.uk/News_pages/PCRG%20Gudielines%203rd%20Edition%20%282010%29.pdf
166.
Rouillard SE. The Iron Age Pottery from Meare Village East. In: Somerset Levels papers [Internet]. Cambridge: Somerset Levels Project; 1987. p. 183–221. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e8fa7103-7606-e811-80cd-005056af4099
167.
Hill, J. D., Woodward, Ann, Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Vol. Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. occasional publication. Oxford: Oxbow; 2002.
168.
Welcome to the PCRG [Internet]. Available from: http://www.pcrg.org.uk/