Bibliography for ARCLG194: Themes, Thought and Theory in World Archaeology: Current Topics: Katherine Irene Wright

1
Collard M, Shennan S. Patterns, processes and parsimony: studying cultural evolution with analytical techniques from evolutionary biology. In: Cultural transmission and material culture: breaking down boundaries. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 2008. 17–33.http://www.sfu.ca/~mcollard/documents/Collard,%20M.%20&%20Shennan,%20S.J.%20%282008%29.pdf

2
Johnson M. A visit to Down House: some interpretive comments on evolutionary archaeology. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011. 307–24.http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/185223/1/Johnson_Darwin_Final_Feb_101.pdf

3
Kristiansen K. Genes versus agents. A discussion of the widening theoretical gap in archaeology. Archaeological Dialogues 2004;11:77–99. doi:10.1017/S1380203805211509

4
Joyce Marcus. The Archaeological Evidence for Social Evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology;37:251–66.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20622624

5
Shennan S. An evolutionary perspective on social agency in archaeology. In: Agency uncovered: archaeological perspectives on social agency, power, and being human. London: : UCL Press 2004. 33–50.

6
Stark MT, Bowser BJ, Horne L. Why breaking down boundaries matters for archaeological research on learning and cultural transmission. In: Cultural transmission and material culture: breaking down boundaries. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 2008. 1–16.http://www.anthropology.hawaii.edu/people/faculty/Stark/pdfs/Stark_Bowser_Horne_2008.pdf

7
Joyce R. Heirlooms and houses: materiality and social memory. In: Beyond kinship: social and material reproduction in house societies. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2000. 189–212.

8
Mills B. Colonialism and cuisine: cultural transmission, agency and history at Zuni pueblo. In: Cultural transmission and material culture: breaking down boundaries. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 2008. 245–62.

9
Lewis R. Binford. A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity;29:425–41.http://www.jstor.org/stable/277978

10
Binford LR, Quimby GI. An archaeological perspective. New York: : Seminar Press 1972.

11
Binford, Lewis Roberts. In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record : with a new afterword. Berkeley, CA: : University of California Press 2002.

12
Darwin, Charles, Beer, Gillian. The origin of species. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.

13
Darwin, Charles, Beer, Gillian. The origin of species. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1996.

14
David, Nicholas, Kramer, Carol. Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.

15
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.

16
Orton, Clive. Sampling in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.

17
Popper, Karl R. The logic of scientific discovery. London: : Routledge 2002. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203994627

18
Schiffer, Michael. B. Behavioral archaeology. New York: : Academic Press 1976.

19
Schiffer MB. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1996.

20
Service, Elman Rogers. Primitive social organization: an evolutionary perspective. 2nd ed. New York: : Random House 1971.

21
Steward, Julian Haynes. Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution. Urbana, Ill: : University of Illinois Press 1955.

22
Watson, Patty Jo, Redman, Charles L., LeBlanc, Steven A. Explanation in archeology: an explicitly scientific approach. New York: : Columbia University Press 1971.

23
White, Leslie A. The evolution of culture: the development of civilization to the fall of Rome. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

24
Collingwood, R. G., Dussen, W. J. van der. The idea of history. Rev. ed., with lectures 1926-1928. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1994.

25
Bourdieu, Pierre, Nice, Richard. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1977.

26
Giddens, Anthony. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1986.

27
Gosden C. Postcolonial archaeology: issues of culture, identity and knowledge. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2001. 241–61.

28
Habermas, Jürgen. The theory of communicative action: Vol.1: Reason and the rationalization of society. London: : Heinemann Education 1984.

29
Habermas, Jürgen. The theory of communicative action: Vol.2: Lifeworld and system. Cambridge: : Polity 1987.

30
Hodder, Ian, University of Cambridge. Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982.

31
Hodder, Ian. Symbols in action: ethnoarchaeological studies of material culture. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982.

32
Hodder, Ian. The present past: an introduction to anthropology for archaeologists. London: : Batsford 1982.

33
Ian Hodder. Postprocessual Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory;8:1–26.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170185

34
Hodder, Ian, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000.

35
Kuhn, Thomas S., Hacking, Ian. The structure of scientific revolutions. 4th ed. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2012.

36
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Structural anthropology. [New York]: : Basic Books 1963.

37
Ricœur, Paul. From text to action. New ed. Evanston, Ill: : Northwestern University Press 2007.

38
Tilley, Christopher Y. Reading material culture: structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1990.

39
Boyd, Robert, Richerson, Peter J. Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1985.

40
Cochrane, Ethan E., Gardner, Andrew. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011.

41
Gardner, Andrew. Agency uncovered: archaeological perspectives on social agency, power, and being human. London: : UCL Press 2004.

42
Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN. Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2006;29. doi:10.1017/S0140525X06009083

43
Richerson, Peter J., Boyd, Robert. Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2005.

44
Schiffer MB. Social theory in archaeology. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2000.

45
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: : Thames & Hudson 2002.

46
Stark MT, Bowser BJ, Horne L. Cultural transmission and material culture: breaking down boundaries. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 2008.

47
Costin C. Craft specialization: issues in defining, documentating and explaining the organization of production. Archaeological method and theory 1991;3:1–56.

48
Dobres M-A, Hoffman C. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of archaeological method and theory 1994;1:211–58.

49
Gell A. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998.

50
Hayden B. Practical and prestige technologies: The evolution of material systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1998;5:1–55. doi:10.1007/BF02428415

51
Hegmon M. Archaeological Research on Style. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992;21:517–36. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505

52
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1986;5:147–86. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(86)90012-7

53
Miller D. Theories of things. In: Stuff. Cambridge: : Polity 2010. 42–78.

54
Dietler M, Herbich I. Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture boundaries. In: The archaeology of social boundaries. Washington [D.C.]: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1998. 232–63.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=776dd0b6-bba6-ec11-a99b-0050f2f01d9b

55
Farbstein R. Technologies of Art. Current Anthropology 2011;52:401–32. doi:10.1086/660057

56
Mullins PR. The Archaeology of Consumption. Annual Review of Anthropology 2011;40:133–44. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145746

57
Wright KI, Garrard AN. Social identities and the expansion of stone beadmaking in Neolithic western Asia. Antiquity 2003;77:267–84.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217566542?accountid=14511

58
Adams, William Yewdale, Adams, Ernest W. Archaeological typology and practical reality: a dialectical approach to artifact classification and sorting. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511558207

59
Appadurai, Arjun. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

60
Bettinger RL, Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Style, function and cultural evolutionary processes. In: Darwinian archaeologies. London: : Plenum Press 1996. 133–64.

61
Binford LR. Interassemblage variability - the Mousterian and the functional argument. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973. 227–54.

62
Braun D. Pots as tools. In: Archaeological hammers and theories. London: : Academic Press 1983. 107–34.

63
Brumfiel EM. Elite and utilitarian crafts in the Aztec state. In: Specialization, exchange, and complex societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987. 102–18.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL3045_42401.pdf

64
Clark JE. Craft specialization as an archaeological category. Research in economic anthropology 1995;16:267–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c94dfee2-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

65
Hastorf, Christine Ann, Conkey, Margaret Wright. The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.

66
Nicholas David, Judy Sterner and Kodzo Gavua. Why Pots are Decorated. Current Anthropology 1988;Vol. 29:365–89.

67
Dobres, Marcia-Anne. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework for archaeology. Oxford: : Blackwell Publishers 2000.

68
Robert C. Dunnell. Style and Function: A Fundamental Dichotomy. American Antiquity 1978;Vol. 43:192–202.

69
Dunnell RC. Methodological issues in American artifact classification. Advances in archaeological method and theory 1986;9:149–207.

70
Hodder I. Material practice, symbolism and ideology. In: Theory and practice in archaeology. London: : Routledge 1992. 201–12.

71
Lemonnier P. Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: : Routledge 1993. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887630

72
Lyman, R. Lee, O’Brien, Michael J. Style, function, transmission: evolutionary archaeological perspectives. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2003.

73
Miller D. Artefacts and the meaning of things. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.

74
Miller, Daniel. Material cultures: why some things matter. London: : University College London Press 1997.

75
Nelson MC. The study of technological organization. Journal of archaeological method and theory 1991;3:57–100.

76
O’Brien M, Leonard R. Style and function: an introduction. In: Style and function: conceptual issues in evolutionary archaeology. London: : Bergin & Garvey 2001. 183–202.

77
Pfaffenberger B. Social Anthropology of Technology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992;21:491–516. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002423

78
Plog S. Analysis of Style in Artifacts. Annual Review of Anthropology 1983;12:125–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.12.100183.001013

79
Prudence M. Rice, William Y. Adams, Joseph W. Ball, Whitney M. Davis, Timothy Earle, Robert E. Fry, Ian Hodder, L. R. V. Joesink-Mandeville, Charles C. Kolb, Masae Nishimura, Yasushi Kojo, Miguel Rivera Dorado, Barbara L. Stark and Sander E. Van Der Leeuw. Evolution of Specialized Pottery Production: A Trial Model [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 1981;Vol. 22:219–40.

80
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.

81
Lange, Frederick W., Bishop, Ronald L. The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991.

82
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 1. Function, Style, and Origins. Journal of Archaeological Research;4:133–63.https://www.jstor.org/stable/41053114

83
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research;4:165–202.https://www.jstor.org/stable/41053131

84
Prudence M. Rice. On the Origins of Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory;6:1–54.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177395

85
Sackett J. Style and ethnicity in archaeology: the case for isochrestism. In: The uses of style in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 32–43.

86
Schiffer, Michael B. Anthropological perspectives on technology. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 2001.

87
Michael Brian Schiffer and James M. Skibo. The Explanation of Artifact Variability. American Antiquity 1997;Vol. 62:27–50.

88
Shennan S. Tradition, rationality and cultural transmission. In: Processual and postprocessual archaeologies: multiple ways of knowing the past. [Carbondale, Ill.]: : Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 1991. 197–208.

89
Sigault F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1klfcc3/TN_cdi_proquest_ebookcentral_EBC169490

90
Sillar B, Tite MS. The challenge of ‘technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20.https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

91
Sterner J. Who is signalling whom? Ceramic style, ethnicity and taphonomy among the Sirak Bulahay. Antiquity 1989;63:451–9.

92
Tilley C. Interpreting material culture. In: The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression. London: : Routledge 1989. 185–94.

93
Polly Wiessner. Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 1983;48:253–76.

94
Wobst HM. Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In: For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin. Ann Arbor: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1977. 317–42.https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.3998/mpub.11395371

95
Bourdieu P. The Berber house or the world reversed. In: Rules and meanings: the anthropology of everyday knowledge : selected readings. Harmondsworth: : Penguin Education 1973. 133–53.

96
Goody J. The fission of domestic groups among the LoDogaba. In: The developmental cycle in domestic groups. Cambridge: : published for the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology at the University Press 1958. 53–91.

97
González-Ruibal A. House societies vs. kinship-based societies: An archaeological case from Iron Age Europe. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2006;25:144–73. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.09.002

98
Joyce R. Heirlooms and houses: materiality and social memory. In: Beyond kinship: social and material reproduction in house societies. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 2000. 189–212.

99
Sahlins MD. Chapter 2. In: Stone Age economics. London: : Routledge 2004.

100
Allison, Penelope Mary. The archaeology of household activities. London: : Routledge 1999.

101
Carsten, Janet, Hugh-Jones, Stephen. About the house: Leví-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995.

102
Flannery KV. The origins of the village as a settlement type in Mesoamerica and the Near East : a comparative study. In: Man, settlement and urbanism: proceedings of a meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. London: : Duckworth 1972. 23–53.

103
Gamble, Clive, Boismier, W. A. Ethnoarchaeological aproaches to mobile campsites: hunter-gatherer and pastoralist case studies. Ann Arbor, Mich: : International Monographs in Prehistory 1991.

104
Goody, Jack. The developmental cycle in domestic groups. Cambridge: : published for the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology at the University Press 1958.

105
Hendon J. ARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO THE ORGANIZATION OF DOMESTIC LABOR: Household Practice and Domestic Relations. Annual Review of Anthropology 1996;25:45–61.http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.45

106
Hillier, Bill, Hanson, Julienne. The social logic of space. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1984.

107
Kent, Susan. Domestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.

108
Kroll, Ellen M., Price, T. Douglas, Society for American Archaeology. The interpretation of archaeological spatial patterning. London: : Plenum Press 1991.

109
Lawrence DL, Low SM. The Built Environment and Spatial Form. Annual Review of Anthropology 1990;19:453–505. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.002321

110
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The way of the masks. Seattle: : University of Washington Press 1982.

111
Moore, Henrietta L. Space, text, and gender: an anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya. London: : Guilford Press 1996.

112
Netting et al. R. Introduction. In: Households: comparative and historical studies of the domestic group. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1984. XIII–XXXVIII.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5082665a-5836-e711-80c9-005056af4099

113
Netting R. Introduction. In: Smallholders, householders: farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1993.

114
Oliver, Paul. Dwellings: the house across the world. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1987.

115
Rapoport, Amos. The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills: : Sage 1982.

116
Samson, Ross. The social archaeology of houses. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1990.

117
Steadman S. Recent research in the archaeology of architecture: beyond the foundations. Journal of archaeological research 1996;4:51–93.

118
Wilk RR. The Household economy: reconsidering the domestic mode of production. Boulder, [Colo.]: : Westview Press 1989.

119
Folorunso CA. Gender and archaeological site formation: ethnoarchaeological studies in parts of Nigeria. In: Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. 353–72.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9caf6d6a-7f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

120
Kramer C. Spatial organization in contemporary southwest Asian villages & archaeological sampling. In: The Hilly flanks and beyond: essays on the prehistory of southwestern Asia presented to Robert J. Braidwood, November l5, l982. Chicago, Ill: : Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 1983. 347–68.

121
Parker Pearson M, Richards C. Ordering the world: perceptions of architecture, space and time. In: Architecture and order: approaches to social space. London: : Routledge 1994. 1–37.

122
Rapoport A. Spatial organization and the built environment. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 460–502.

123
Allison, Penelope Mary. Pompeian households: an analysis of the material culture. Los Angeles: : Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at University of California, Los Angeles 2004.

124
Donley L. House power: Swahili space and symbolic markers. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 63–73.

125
Fairclough G. Meaningful constructions – spatial and functional analysis of medieval buildings. Antiquity 1992;66:348–66.

126
Foster SM. Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity 1989;63:40–50.

127
Grahame M. Public and private in the Roman house: the spatial order of the Casa del Fauno. In: Domestic space in the Roman world: Pompeii and beyond. Portsmouth, RI: : JRA 1997. 137–64.

128
Hales, Shelley. The Roman house and social identity. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003.

129
Lyons D. The politics of house shape: round vs rectilinear domestic structures in Dela compounds, northern Cameroon. Antiquity 1996;70:351–67.

130
Nevett, Lisa C. House and society in the ancient Greek world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.

131
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. Houses and society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1994.

132
Wright K. The social origins of cooking and dining in early villages of western Asia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 2000;66:89–121.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2037_42259.pdf

133
Clark J, Blake M. The power of prestige: competitive generosity and the emergence of rank societies in lowland Mesoamerica. In: Factional competition and political development in the New World. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993. 17–30.https://www.academia.edu/1794085/Clark_and_Blake_1994_The_power_of_prestige_Competitive_generosity_and_the_emergence_of_rank_societies_in_lowland_Mesoamerica

134
Sahlins, Marshall David. Stone Age economics. London: : Routledge 2004.

135
Carla M. Sinopoli. The Archaeology of Empires. Annual Review of Anthropology;23:159–80.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2156010

136
Smith AT. Archaeologies of Sovereignty. Annual Review of Anthropology 2011;40:415–32. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145754

137
Wright KI (Karen). Domestication and inequality? Households, corporate groups and food processing tools at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2014;33:1–33. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2013.09.007

138
Norman Yoffee. Political Economy in Early Mesopotamian States. Annual Review of Anthropology;24:281–311.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155939

139
Gledhill J. Introduction: the comparative analysis of social and political transitions. In: State and society: the emergence and development of social hierarchy and political centralization. London: : Unwin Hyman 1988. 1–29.

140
Sills DL. International encyclopedia of the social sciences. [New York]: : Macmillan 1968.

141
William Roseberry. Political Economy. Annual Review of Anthropology;17:161–85.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155910

142
Raymond T. Smith. Anthropology and the Concept of Social Class. Annual Review of Anthropology;13:467–94.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155678

143
Adams RM. The evolution of urban society: early Mesopotamia and prehispanic Mexico. London: : Weidenfeld and Nicolson 1966.

144
Alcock, Susan E. Empires: perspectives from archaeology and history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.

145
Boserup, Ester. The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Chicago, Ill: : Aldine 1965.

146
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Fox, John W. Factional competition and political development in the New World. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.

147
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Earle, Timothy K. Specialization, exchange, and complex societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

148
Champion, T. C. Centre and periphery: comparative studies in archaeology. London: : Routledge 1995.

149
Childe, V. Gordon. Man makes himself. New York: : New American Library 1983.

150
Charles R. Cobb. Archaeological Approaches to the Political Economy of Nonstratified Societies. Archaeological Method and Theory;5:43–100.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170229

151
Earle, Timothy K. How chiefs come to power: the political economy in prehistory. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1997.

152
Engels, Friedrich. The Origin of the family, private property and the state. Harmondsworth: : Penguin Books 1985.

153
Kent V. Flannery. The Cultural Evolution of Civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics;3:399–426.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096853

154
Gledhill, John, Bender, Barbara, Larsen, Mogens Trolle, et al. State and society: the emergence and development of social hierarchy and political centralization. London: : Routledge 1995.

155
Goody, Jack. Production and reproduction: a comparative study of the domestic domain. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1976.

156
Setha M. Low. The Anthropology of Cities: Imagining and Theorizing the City. Annual Review of Anthropology;25:383–409.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155832

157
Mann, Michael. The sources of social power. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

158
Price, T. Douglas, Feinman, Gary M., Society for American Archaeology. Pathways to power: new perspectives on the emergence of social inequality. New York: : Springer 2010.

159
Renfrew, Colin, Cherry, John F. Peer polity interaction and socio-political change. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

160
Rowlands, M. J., Larsen, Mogens Trolle, Kristiansen, Kristian. Centre and periphery in the ancient world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

161
Service, Elman Rogers. Origins of the state and civilization: the process of cultural evolution. 1st ed. New York: : Norton

162
Service, Elman Rogers. Primitive social organization: an evolutionary perspective. 2nd ed. New York: : Random House 1971.

163
Shenk MK, Borgerhoff Mulder M, Beise J, et al. Intergenerational Wealth Transmission among Agriculturalists. Current Anthropology 2010;51:65–83. doi:10.1086/648658

164
Sherratt A. What would a Bronze Age world-system look like? Journal of European archaeology : journal of the European Association of Archaeologists 1993;1:1–57.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f14f432e-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

165
Steward, Julian Haynes. Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution. Urbana, Ill: : University of Illinois Press 1955.

166
Tainter, Joseph A. The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1988.

167
Upham, Steadman. The Evolution of political systems: sociopolitics in small-scale sedentary societies. Cambridge [England]: : Cambridge University Press 1990.

168
Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. The politics of the world economy: the states, the movements and the civilisations. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1984.

169
White, Leslie A. The evolution of culture: the development of civilization to the fall of Rome. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

170
Adams RM. Heartland of cities: surveys of ancient settlement and land use on the central floodplain of the Euphrates. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1981.

171
Bard, Kathryn A. From farmers to Pharaohs: mortuary evidence for the rise of complex society in Egypt. Sheffield: : Sheffield Academic Press 1994.

172
Brumfiel EM. Elite and utilitarian crafts in the Aztec state. In: Specialization, exchange, and complex societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987. 102–18.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL3045_42401.pdf

173
Cherry JF. Power in space. In: Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987. 146–72.

174
Earle TK. Specialization and the production of wealth: Hawaiian chiefdoms and the Inka empire. In: Specialization, exchange, and complex societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

175
Flannery, Kent V., Marcus, Joyce, School of American Research (Santa Fe, N.M.). The Cloud people: divergent evolution of the Zapotec and Mixtec civilizations. New York: : Academic Press 1983.

176
Haas, Jonathan, Pozorski, Shelia Griffis, Pozorski, Thomas George. The origins and development of the Andean state. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

177
Keswani P. Hierarchies, heterarchies and urbanization processes. Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 1996;9:211–50.

178
Marston J. Agricultural Strategies and Political Economy in Ancient Anatolia. American Journal of Archaeology 2012;116:377–403. doi:10.3764/aja.116.3.0377

179
McIntosh, Susan Keech. Beyond chiefdoms: pathways to complexity in Africa. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1999.

180
Muller, Jon. Mississippian political economy. New York: : Plenum Press 1997.

181
Sherratt, Andrew. Economy and society in prehistoric Europe: changing perspectives. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1997.

182
Webster, David L. Warfare and the evolution of the state: a perspective from the Maya lowlands. [Greeley]: : University of Northern Colorado, Museum of Anthropology 1976.

183
Chapman R. Death, society and archaeology: The social dimensions of mortuary practices. Mortality 2003;8:305–12. doi:10.1080/13576270310001599849

184
Chapman, Robert, Kinnes, Ian, Randsborg, Klavs. The Archaeology of death. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1981.

185
Huntington, Richard, Metcalf, Peter. Celebrations of death: the anthropology of mortuary ritual. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1979.

186
Parker Pearson, Michael. The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: : Sutton 1999.

187
Sayer, Duncan. Ethics and burial archaeology. London: : Duckworth 2010.

188
Tarlow, Sarah. Bereavement and commemoration: an archaeology of mortality. Oxford, UK: : Blackwell Publishers 1999.

189
Arnold, Bettina, Wicker, Nancy L. Gender and the archaeology of death. Oxford: : AltaMira 2001.

190
Bloch, Maurice. From blessing to violence: history and ideology in the circumcision ritual of the Merina of Madagascar. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

191
Parry, Jonathan P., Bloch, Maurice. Death and the regeneration of life. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982.

192
Brown, James Allison, Society for American Archaeology, American Anthropological Association. Approaches to the social dimensions of mortuary practices. [Washington D.C.]: : Society for American Archaeology 1971.

193
Aubrey Cannon, Brad Bartel, Richard Bradley, R. W. Chapman, Mary Lou Curran, David W. J. Gill, S. C. Humphreys, Cl. Masset, Ian Morris, Jeffrey Quilter, Nan A. Rothschild and Curtis Runnels. The Historical Dimension in Mortuary Expressions of Status and Sentiment [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 1989;30:437–58.

194
Carr C. Mortuary practices: their social, philosophical-religious, circumstantial and physical determinants. Journal of archaeological method and theory 1995;2:105–99.

195
Chamberlain, Andrew. Human remains. Berkeley: : British Museum 1994.

196
Chapman J. Tension at funerals: social practices and the subversion of community structure in later Hungarian prehistory. In: Agency in archaeology. London: : Routledge 2000. 165–95.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317959403

197
Degusta D. Fijian cannibalism and mortuary ritual: bioarchaeological evidence from Vunda. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 2000;10:76–92.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1212%28200001/02%2910:1%3C76::AID-OA506%3E3.0.CO;2-%23/abstract

198
Pollard, Tony, Downes, Jane. The loved body’s corruption: archaeological contributions to the study of human mortality. Glasgow: : Cruithne Press 1999.

199
Goody, Jack, Goody, Jack. Death, property and the ancestors: a study of the mortuary customs of the LoDagaa of West Africa. London: : Routledge 2004.

200
Douglas H. MacDonald. Grief and Burial in the American Southwest: The Role of Evolutionary Theory in the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains. American Antiquity 2001;66:704–14.

201
Mays, Simon. The archaeology of human bones. London: : Routledge 1998.

202
Metcalf, Peter, Huntington, Richard. Celebrations of death: the anthropology of mortuary ritual. 2nd ed., rev. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991.

203
Morris, Ian. Burial and ancient society: the rise of the Greek city-state. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

204
Morris I. The Archaeology of Ancestors: The Saxe/Goldstein Hypothesis Revisited. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1991;1. doi:10.1017/S0959774300000330

205
Morris, Ian. Death-ritual and social structure in classical antiquity. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.

206
O’Shea, John M. Mortuary variability: an archaeological investigation. London: : Academic Press 1984.

207
Parker Pearson M. From now to then: ethnoarchaeology and analogy. In: The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: : Sutton 1999. 21–44.

208
Parker Pearson M. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnoarchaeological study. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 99–113.http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/davidson/Arch%20of%20Death/Week%2012/Parker%20Pearson%201982.pdf

209
Parker Pearson M. The powerful dead: archaeological relationships between the living and the dead. Cambridge archaeological journal 1993;3:203–29.

210
Parker Pearson M. Return of the living dead: morturay analysis and the New Archaeology revisited. Antiquity 1995;69:1046–8.

211
Pietrusewsky M, Douglas MT, Cochrane EE, et al. Cultural Modifications in an Adolescent Earth-Oven Interment from Fiji: Sorting out Mortuary Practice. The Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 2007;2:44–71. doi:10.1080/15564890701228579

212
Rakita, Gordon F. M. Interacting with the dead: perspectives on mortuary archaeology for the new millennium. Gainesville: : University Press of Florida 2005.

213
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: : Leicester University Press 1996. 229–47.

214
Scarre C. The meaning of death: funerary beliefs and the prehistorian. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 75–82.

215
Shennan S. The social organization at Branc. Antiquity 1975;49:279–88.

216
Tainter J. Mortuary practices and the study of prehistoric social systems. Advances in archaeological method and theory 1978;1:105–41.

217
Peter J. Ucko. Ethnography and Archaeological Interpretation of Funerary Remains. World Archaeology 1969;1:262–80.

218
Whitley J. Too many ancestors. Antiquity 2002;76:119–26.

219
Brück J. Experiencing the past? The development of a phenomenological archaeology in British prehistory. Archaeological Dialogues 2005;12. doi:10.1017/S1380203805001583

220
Hodges R. Spatial models, anthropology and archaeology. In: Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987. 118–33.

221
Johnson MH. Phenomenological Approaches in Landscape Archaeology*. Annual Review of Anthropology 2012;41:269–84. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145840

222
Stephen A. Kowalewski. Regional Settlement Pattern Studies. Journal of Archaeological Research 2008;16:225–85.

223
Thomas J. Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2001. 165–86.

224
Adams, Robert McCormick. Heartland of cities: surveys of ancient settlement and land use on the central floodplain of the Euphrates. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1981.

225
Osborne, Robin, Alcock, Susan E. Placing the gods: sanctuaries and sacred space in ancient Greece. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994.

226
Ashmore, Wendy, Knapp, Arthur Bernard. Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishers 1999.

227
Ashmore W. Social archaeologies of landscape. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 255–71.

228
Barrett JC. The mythical landscapes of the British Iron Age. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell Publishers 1999. 253–65.

229
Barrett JC. Chronologies of landscape. In: The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: : Routledge 1999. 21–30.

230
Barbara Bender. Theorising Landscapes, and the Prehistoric Landscapes of Stonehenge. Man 1992;27:735–55.

231
Bender, Barbara. Landscape: politics and perspectives. New York: : Berg 1993.

232
Bender, Barbara, Tilley, Christopher Y., Anderson, Ed, et al. Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

233
Binford LR. The archaeology of place. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1982;1:5–31. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(82)90006-X

234
Lewis R. Binford. Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation. American Antiquity 1980;45:4–20.

235
Lewis R. Binford. A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity 1964;29:425–41.

236
Bintliff JL. Settlement and territory. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 505–45.

237
Brown T. Reconstructing the environment and natural landscape. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 222–65.

238
Butzer, Karl W. Archaeology as human ecology: method and theory for a contextual approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982.

239
Carmichael, David L. Sacred sites, sacred places. London: : Routledge 1994.

240
Cherry J. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In: Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987. 146–72.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=91501fdd-5d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

241
Cosgrove, Denis E. Social formation and symbolic landscape. [New ed.]. Madison, Wis: : University of Wisconsin Press 1998.

242
Crumley C. Three locational models: an epistemological assessment for anthropology and archaeology. Advances in archaeological method and theory 1978;2:143–74.

243
Thomas, Julian, David, Bruno. Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008.

244
Timothy K. Earle, Robert W. Preucel, Elizabeth M. Brumfiel, Christopher Carr, W. Frederick Limp, Christopher Chippindale, Antonio Gilman, Ian Hodder, Gregory A. Johnson, William F. Keegan, A. Bernard Knapp, Parker B. Potter Jr., Nicolas Rolland, Ralph M. Rowlett, Bruce G. Trigger and Robert N. Zeitlin. Processual Archaeology and the Radical Critique [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 1987;28:501–38.

245
Edmonds M. Who Said Romance Was Dead? Journal of Material Culture 2006;11:167–88. doi:10.1177/1359183506063019

246
Basso, Keith H., Feld, Steven. Senses of place. Santa Fe, NM: : School of American Research Press 1996.

247
Fisher P, Farrelly C, Maddocks A, et al. Spatial Analysis of Visible Areas from the Bronze Age Cairns of Mull. Journal of Archaeological Science 1997;24:581–92. doi:10.1006/jasc.1996.0142

248
Flannery KV. The village and its catchment area. In: The early Mesoamerican village. London: : Academic Press 1976. 103–17.

249
Fleming A. Phenomenology and the Megaliths of Wales: a Dreaming Too Far? Oxford Journal of Archaeology 1999;18:119–25. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00074

250
Graham, Elizabeth A. Maya Christians and their churches in sixteenth-century Belize. Gainesville: : University Press of Florida 2011.

251
Graham E. Close encounters. In: Maya worldviews at conquest. Boulder, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 2009. 17–38.

252
Hamilton S. The ambiguity of landscape: discussing points of relatedness in concepts and methods. In: Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011. 263–80.

253
Hamilton S, Whitehouse R, Brown K, et al. Phenomenology in Practice: Towards a p Methodology for a `Subjective’ Approach. European Journal of Archaeology 2006;9:31–71. doi:10.1177/1461957107077704

254
Higgs ES, Vita-Finzi C. Prehistoric economies: a territorial approach. In: Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: : Cambridge University Press 1972. 27–36.

255
Hirsch, Eric, O’Hanlon, Michael. The anthropology of landscape: perspectives on place and space. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1995.

256
Hodder I. Locational models and the study of Romano-British settlement. In: Models in archaeology. London: : Methuen 1972. 887–909.

257
Tim Ingold. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology 1993;25:152–74.

258
Johnson GA. Aspects of Regional Analysis in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1977;6:479–508. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.06.100177.002403

259
John Kantner. The Archaeology of Regions: From Discrete Analytical Toolkit to Ubiquitous Spatial Perspective. Journal of Archaeological Research;16:37–81.

260
Mark Lake. Viewing Space. World Archaeology 2007;39:1–3.

261
Llobera M. Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity;70:612–22.

262
Llobera M. Building Past Landscape Perception With GIS: Understanding Topographic Prominence. Journal of Archaeological Science 2001;28:1005–14. doi:10.1006/jasc.2001.0720

263
McGlade J. Archaeology and the evolution of cultural landscapes: towards an interdisciplinary agenda. In: The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: : Routledge 1999. 458–82.

264
Parsons JR. Archaeological Settlement Patterns. Annual Review of Anthropology 1972;1:127–50. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.01.100172.001015

265
Renfrew AC. Space, time and polity. In: The evolution of social systems: proceedings of a meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. NW1 [i.e. London]: : Duckworth 1977. 89–112.

266
Roberts, Brian K. Landscapes of settlement: prehistory to the present. London: : Routledge 1996.

267
Wandsnider, LuAnn, Rossignol, Jacqueline, Society for American Archaeology. Space, time, and archaeological landscapes. London: : Plenum Press 1992.

268
Schama, Simon. Landscape and memory. London: : HarperCollins Publishers 1995.

269
Smith CA. Regional economic systems: linking geographical models and socioeconomic problems. In: Regional analysis: Vol.1: Economic systems. London: : Academic Press 1976. 3–63.

270
Michael E. Smith. The Aztec Marketing System and Settlement Pattern in the Valley of Mexico: A Central Place Analysis. American Antiquity 1979;44:110–25.

271
Thomas JS. The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In: Landscape: politics and perspectives. New York: : Berg 1993. 19–48.

272
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: : Berg 1994. 7–34.

273
Tilley C. Round Barrows and Dykes as Landscape Metaphors. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2004;14:185–203. doi:10.1017/S0959774304000125

274
Tilley CY. The powers of rocks: topography and monument construction on Bodmin Moor. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: : Berg 1994. 161–76.

275
Tilley C. Phenomenological approaches to landscape archaeology. In: Handbook of landscape archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008. 271–6.

276
Christopher Tilley and Wayne Bennett. An Archaeology of Supernatural Places: The Case of West Penwith. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2001;7:335–62.

277
Townsend RF. Landscape and symbol. In: The ancient Americas: art from sacred landscapes. Chicago: : Art Institute of Chicago 1992. 29–47.

278
Trigger BG. The determinants of settlement patterns. In: Settlement archaeology. Palo Alto [Cal.]: : National Press Books 1968. 53–78.

279
Tuan, Yi-fu. Space and place: the perspective of experience. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 1977.

280
Ucko PJ, Layton R. Introduction: gazing on the landscape and encountering the environment. In: The archaeology and anthropology of landscape: shaping your landscape. London: : Routledge 1999. 1–20.

281
Wagstaff, J. Malcolm. Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987.

282
Wandsnider L. Regional scale processes and archaeological landscape units. In: Unit issues in archaeology: measuring time, space, and material. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1998. 87–102.

283
Currie TE, Mace R. Mode and tempo in the evolution of socio-political organization: reconciling ‘Darwinian’ and ‘Spencerian’ evolutionary approaches in anthropology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2011;366:1108–17. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0318

284
Haas J. A brief history of cultural evolution: stages, agents and tinkering. 2006;96-05–025.http://www.santafe.edu/media/workingpapers/96-05-025.pdf

285
Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN. Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2006;29. doi:10.1017/S0140525X06009083

286
Stephen Shennan. Evolution in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology;37:75–91.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20622614

287
Steele J, Jordan P, Cochrane E. Evolutionary approaches to cultural and linguistic diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2010;365:3781–5. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0202

288
Robert L. Bettinger and Jelmer Eerkens. Point Typologies, Cultural Transmission, and the Spread of Bow-and-Arrow Technology in the Prehistoric Great Basin. American Antiquity;64:231–42.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694276

289
Boone JL, Smith EA. Is It Evolution Yet? A Critique of Evolutionary Archaeology. Current Anthropology 1998;39:S141–74. doi:10.1086/204693

290
Jack M. Broughton and James F. O’Connell. On Evolutionary Ecology, Selectionist Archaeology, and Behavioral Archaeology. American Antiquity;64:153–65.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694351

291
Jelmer W. Eerkens and Carl P. Lipo. Cultural Transmission Theory and the Archaeological Record: Providing Context to Understanding Variation and Temporal Changes in Material Culture. Journal of Archaeological Research;15:239–74.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053240

292
Clare Janaki Holden. Bantu Language Trees Reflect the Spread of Farming across Sub-Saharan Africa: A Maximum-Parsimony Analysis. Proceedings: Biological Sciences;269:793–9.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3067712

293
Jordan P, Shennan S. Cultural transmission, language, and basketry traditions amongst the California Indians. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2003;22:42–74. doi:10.1016/S0278-4165(03)00004-7

294
KANDLER A, PERREAULT C, STEELE J. EDITORIAL — CULTURAL EVOLUTION IN SPATIALLY STRUCTURED POPULATIONS: A REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVE MODELING FRAMEWORKS. Advances in Complex Systems 2012;15. doi:10.1142/S0219525912030014

295
Leonard RD, Jones GT. Elements of an inclusive evolutionary model for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1987;6:199–219. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(87)90001-8

296
Lipo, Carl P., Society for American Archaeology. Mapping our ancestors: phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Aldine Transaction 2006.

297
Lipo CP, Madsen ME, Dunnell RC, et al. Population Structure, Cultural Transmission, and Frequency Seriation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1997;16:301–33. doi:10.1006/jaar.1997.0314

298
Lyman RL, O’Brien MJ. The Goals of Evolutionary Archaeology: History and Explanation. Current Anthropology 1998;39:615–52. doi:10.1086/204786

299
Mesoudi A, Whiten A, Laland KN. PERSPECTIVE:IS HUMAN CULTURAL EVOLUTION DARWINIAN? EVIDENCE REVIEWED FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES. Evolution 2004;58. doi:10.1554/03-212

300
Tim Murray. Evaluating Evolutionary Archaeology. World Archaeology;34:47–59.http://www.jstor.org/stable/827937

301
Fraser D. Neiman. Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Inferences from Decorative Diversity and Interassemblage Distance in Illinois Woodland Ceramic Assemblages. American Antiquity;60:7–36.http://www.jstor.org/stable/282074

302
Neiman F. Conspicuous consumption as wasteful advertising: a Darwinian perspective on spatial patterns in Classic Maya terminal monument dates. In: Rediscovering Darwin: evolutionary theory and archeological explanation. Arlington, Va: : American Anthropological Association 1997. 267–90.http://people.virginia.edu/~fn9r/papers/Neiman1997.pdf

303
O’Brien MJ, Darwent J, Lyman RL. Cladistics Is Useful for Reconstructing Archaeological Phylogenies: Palaeoindian Points from the Southeastern United States. Journal of Archaeological Science 2001;28:1115–36. doi:10.1006/jasc.2001.0681

304
O’Brien MJ, Lyman RL. Evolutionary archeology: Current status and future prospects. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 2002;11:26–36. doi:10.1002/evan.10007

305
Michael J. O’Brien, R. Lee Lyman and Robert D. Leonard. Basic Incompatibilities between Evolutionary and Behavioral Archaeology. American Antiquity;63:485–98.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694632

306
Richerson PJ, Boyd R. Institutional evolution in the Holocene: the rise of complex societies. In: The origin of human social institutions. Oxford: : Published for The British Academy by Oxford University Press 2001. 197–234.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1ab42fa9-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

307
Peter J. Richerson, Robert Boyd and Robert L. Bettinger. Was Agriculture Impossible during the Pleistocene but Mandatory during the Holocene? A Climate Change Hypothesis. American Antiquity;66:387–411.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694241

308
Deborah S. Rogers and Paul R. Ehrlich. Natural Selection and Cultural Rates of Change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America;105:3416–20.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25461249

309
Michael Brian Schiffer. Some Relationships between Behavioral and Evolutionary Archaeologies. American Antiquity;61:643–62.http://www.jstor.org/stable/282009

310
S. J. Shennan and J. R. Wilkinson. Ceramic Style Change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity;66:577–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694174

311
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: : Thames & Hudson 2002.

312
Steele J, Glatz C, Kandler A. Ceramic diversity, random copying, and tests for selectivity in ceramic production. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010;37:1348–58. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.039

313
Steele J, Shennan S. Introduction: Demography and Cultural Macroevolution. Human Biology 2009;81:105–19. doi:10.3378/027.081.0301

314
Tehrani J, Collard M. Investigating cultural evolution through biological phylogenetic analyses of Turkmen textiles. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2002;21:443–63. doi:10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00002-8

315
Temkin I, Eldredge N. Phylogenetics and Material Cultural Evolution. Current Anthropology 2007;48:146–54. doi:10.1086/510463

316
Fogelin L. The Archaeology of Religious Ritual. Annual Review of Anthropology 2007;36:55–71. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094425

317
Graham EA. Cheese and terms. In: Maya Christians and their churches in sixteenth-century Belize. Gainesville: : University Press of Florida 2011. 59–85.

318
Marcus J, Flannery KV. Ancient Zapotec ritual and religion: an application of the direct historical approach. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 55–74.

319
Renfrew C. Preface and introduction: the excavations at Phylakopi. In: The archaeology of cult: the sanctuary at Phylakopi. London: : Thames and Hudson 1985. 1–26.

320
Shanks M, Tilley C. Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: a reinterpretation of Neolithic mortuary practices. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 129–54.

321
Alcock, Susan E., Osborne, Robin. Placing the gods: sanctuaries and sacred space in ancient Greece. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994.

322
Barrett JC. Towards an archaeology of ritual. In: Sacred and profane: proceedings of a conference on archaeology, ritual and religion, Oxford, 1989. Oxford: : Oxford University Committee for Archaeology 1991. 1–9.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG194_48902.pdf

323
Barth, Fredrik. Ritual and knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea. New Haven, CT.: : Universitetsforlaget 1975.

324
Bloch, Maurice. From blessing to violence: history and ideology in the circumcision ritual of the Merina of Madagascar. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

325
Boyer P, Bergstrom B. Evolutionary Perspectives on Religion. Annual Review of Anthropology 2008;37:111–30. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085201

326
Boyer, Pascal. Religion explained. London: : Heinemann 2001.

327
Carmichael, David L. Sacred sites, sacred places. London: : Routledge 1994.

328
Patricia L. Crown and W. H. Wills. Modifying Pottery and Kivas at Chaco: Pentimento, Restoration, or Renewal? American Antiquity;68:511–32.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3557106

329
Crown, Patricia L., Bishop, Ronald L. Ceramics and ideology: Salado polychrome pottery. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 1994.

330
Douglas, Mary. Natural symbols: explorations in cosmology. [2nd ed.]. London: : Routledge 2003.

331
Douglas, Mary. Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. London: : Routledge 2002.

332
Edwards DN. The archaeology of religion. In: The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. London: : Routledge 2005. 110–28.

333
Fash W. Religion and Human Agency in Ancient Maya History: Tales from the Hieroglyphic Stairway. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2002;12:5–19. doi:10.1017/S095977430200001X

334
Garwood, Paul, University of Oxford. Sacred and profane: proceedings of a conference on archaeology, ritual and religion, Oxford, 1989. Oxford: : Oxford University Committee for Archaeology 1991.

335
Geertz C. Centers, kings and charisma: reflections on the symbolics of power. In: Local knowledge: further essays in interpretive anthropology. London: : Fontana Press 1993. 121–46.

336
Geertz C. Religion as a cultural system. In: Anthropological approaches to the study of religion. London: : Tavistock Publications 1966. 1–46.

337
Graves MW, Sweeney M. Ritual behaviour and ceremonial structures in eastern Polynesia: changing perspectives on archaeological variability. In: The evolution and organisation of prehistoric society in Polynesia. Auckland: : New Zealand Archaeological Association 1993. 102–21.

338
Hays-Gilpin, Kelley, Whitley, David S. Belief in the past: theoretical approaches to the archaeology of religion. Walnut Crees, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008.

339
Meghan C. L. Howey and John M. O’Shea. Bear’s Journey and the Study of Ritual in Archaeology. American Antiquity 2006;Vol. 71.

340
Insoll, Timothy. Archaeology, ritual, religion. London: : Routledge 2004.

341
Insoll, Timothy. Archaeology and world religion. London: : Routledge 2001.

342
Kemp BJ. The intellectual foundations of the early state: chapter 2. In: Ancient Egypt: anatomy of a civilization. London: : Routledge 2006. 60–110.

343
Kolb MJ. Ritual Activity and Chiefly Economy at an Upland Religious Site on Maui, Hawai’i. Journal of Field Archaeology 1994;21:417–36. doi:10.1179/009346994797175569

344
McCauley, Robert N., Lawson, E. Thomas. Bringing ritual to mind: psychological foundations of cultural forms. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2002.

345
Morris, Brian. Anthropological studies of religion: an introductory text. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

346
Neer, W. van, Ervynck, A., O’Day, Sharyn Jones, et al. Behaviour behind bones: the zooarchaeology of ritual, religion, status and identity. Oxford: : Oxbow 2004.

347
Peatfield A. Rural Ritual in Bronze Age Crete: The Peak Sanctuary at Atsipadhes. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2008;2. doi:10.1017/S0959774300000482

348
Polignac, François de, Lloyd, Janet, Mossé, Claude. Cults, territory, and the origins of the Greek city-state. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1995.

349
Renfrew C. The archaeology of religion. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 47–54.

350
Colin Renfrew. Production and Consumption in a Sacred Economy: The Material Correlates of High Devotional Expression at Chaco Canyon. American Antiquity 2001;Vol. 66.

351
Rives J. Religion in the Roman empire. In: Experiencing Rome: culture, identity and power in the Roman Empire. London: : Routledge in association with the Open University 2000. 245–75.

352
Vogt, Evon Zartman, Lessa, William Armand, Watanabe, John M. Reader in comparative religion: an anthropological approach. 4th ed. New York: : Harper & Row 1979.

353
Richard Walter, Tim Thomas and Peter Sheppard. Cult Assemblages and Ritual Practice in Roviana Lagoon, Solomon Islands. World Archaeology 2004;Vol. 36.

354
Whitehouse, Ruth, Accordia Research Centre. Underground religion: cult and culture in prehistoric Italy. London: : Accordia Research Centre, University of London 1992.

355
Whitehouse R. Ritual objects. Archaeological joke or neglected evidence? In: Approaches to the study of ritual: Italy and the ancient Mediterranean : being a series of seminars given at the Institute of Classical Studies School of Advanced Study, University of London. London: : Accordia Research Centre 1996. 9–30.

356
Appadurai A. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 3–63.

357
Bevan A. Making and marking relationships: Bronze Age brandings and Mediterranean commodities. In: Cultures of commodity branding. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2010. 35–85.http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/149856/1/149856_Bevan10c_postprint.pdf

358
Renfrew C. Trade as action at a distance. In: Ancient civilization and trade. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 1975. 3–60.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4267d74d-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099

359
Sahlins, Marshall David. Stone Age economics. London: : Routledge 2004.

360
Shennan S. Cost, benefit and value in the organisation of Early European copper production. Antiquity 1999;73:352–62.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1036521512?accountid=14511

361
Robert McC. Adams, J. M. Adovasio, Burchard Brentjes, H. Neville Chittick, Yehudi A. Cohen, Rolf Gundlach, Frank Hole, William H. McNeill, James Mellaart, Janice Stargardt, Bruce G. Trigger, Gary A. Wright and Henry T. Wright. Anthropological Perspectives on Ancient Trade [and Comments and Replies]. Current Anthropology;15:239–58.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2740901

362
Bevan, Andrew. Stone vessels and values in the Bronze Age Mediterranean. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2007.

363
Bradley, Richard, Edmonds, M. R. Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.

364
Broodbank, Cyprian. An island archaeology of the early Cyclades. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.

365
Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Earle, Timothy K. Specialization, exchange, and complex societies. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

366
John Burton. Repeng and the Salt-Makers: ‘Ecological Trade’ and Stone Axe Production in the Papua New Guinea Highlands. Man;24:255–72.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2803305

367
Champion TC. Introduction. In: Centre and periphery: comparative studies in archaeology. London: : Routledge 1995. 1–21.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4fd9278b-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099

368
Earle, Timothy K., Ericson, Jonathon E., Society for American Archaeology, et al. Exchange systems in prehistory. New York: : Academic Press 1977.

369
Earle T. Prehistoric economics and the archaeology of exchange. In: Contexts for prehistoric exchange. New York: : Academic Press 1982. 1–12.

370
Ericson, Jonathon E., Earle, Timothy K. Contexts for prehistoric exchange. New York: : Academic Press 1982.

371
Flannery KV. The Olmec and the valley of Oaxaca: a model for interregional interaction in Formative times. In: Dumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmec, October 28th and 29th, 1967. Washington: : Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Trustees for Harvard University 1968. 79–110.

372
Gledhill J, Larsen M. The Polanyi paradigm and a dynamic analysis of archaic states. In: Theory and explanation in archaeology: the Southampton conference. New York: : Academic Press 1982. 197–229.

373
Gosden C. Debt, production, and prehistory. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1989;8:355–87. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(89)90026-3

374
Graeber, David. Toward an anthropological theory of value: the false coin of our own dreams. New York: : Palgrave 2001.

375
Helms, Mary W. Ulysses’ sail: an ethnographic odyssey of power, knowledge, and geographical distance. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1988.

376
Kenneth G. Hirth. Political Economy and Archaeology: Perspectives on Exchange and Production. Journal of Archaeological Research;4:203–39.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053132

377
Mauss, Marcel. The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: : Routledge 2002. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203407448

378
Pearson M. Performance as valuation: early Bronze Age burial as theatrical complexity. In: The archaeology of value: essays on prestige and the processes of valuation. Oxford: : John and Erica Hedges 1998. 32–41.

379
Renfrew AC. Varna and the emergence of wealth in later prehistoric Europe. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 141–68.

380
Renfrew AC. Trade beyond the material. In: Trade and exchange in prehistoric Europe: proceedings of a conference held at the University of Bristol, April 1992. Oxford: : published by Oxbow Books in association with the Prehistoric Society and the Société préhistorique française 1993. 5–16.

381
Rowlands, M. J., Larsen, Mogens Trolle, Kristiansen, Kristian. Centre and periphery in the ancient world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

382
Edward M. Schortman and Patricia A. Urban. Modeling Interregional Interaction in Prehistory. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory;11:37–95.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20210096

383
Schortman, Edward M., Urban, Patricia A. Resources, power and interregional interaction. New York: : Plenum 1992.

384
Shennan SJ. Cost, benefit and value in the organization of early European copper production. Antiquity 1999;73:352–63.https://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9434845&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0003598X0008830X

385
Sherratt, Andrew, Sherratt, E. S. From luxuries to commodities : the nature of Mediterranean Bronze Age trading systems / A.G. Sherratt and E.S. Sherratt. Gothenburg: : Paul Astroms

386
Sherratt A. What would a Bronze Age world-system look like? Journal of European archaeology : journal of the European Association of Archaeologists 1993;1:1–57.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f14f432e-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

387
Torrence, Robin. Production and exchange of stone tools: prehistoric obsidian in the Aegean. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

388
Wengrow D. Prehistories of Commodity Branding. Current Anthropology 2008;49:7–34. doi:10.1086/523676

389
Henry T. Wright and Gregory A. Johnson. Population, Exchange, and Early State Formation in Southwestern Iran. American Anthropologist;77:267–89.http://www.jstor.org/stable/674534

390
Zaccagnini C. Aspects of ceremonial exchange in the Near East during the late second millennium BC. In: Centre and periphery in the ancient world. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987. 57–65.

391
Geller PL. Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 2009;38:65–81. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-091908-164414

392
Joyce R. Embodied subjectivity: gender, feminity, masculinity, sexuality. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 82–95.

393
Perry EM, Joyce RA. Providing a past for ‘bodies that matter’: Judith Butler’s impact on the archaeology of gender. International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 2001;6:63–76. doi:10.1023/A:1010142023744

394
Pope R. Processual archaeology and gender politics. The loss of innocence. Archaeological Dialogues 2011;18:59–86. doi:10.1017/S1380203811000134

395
Wylie A. Good science, bad science or science as usual? Feminist critiques of science. In: Women in human evolution. New York: : Routledge 1997. 29–55.

396
Barbara L. Voss. Sexuality Studies in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology;37:317–36.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20622628

397
Butler, Judith. Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: : Routledge 1993.

398
Butler, Judith. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. 2nd ed. New York: : Routledge 2006.

399
Hager, Lori D. Women in human evolution. New York: : Routledge 1997.

400
Moore HL. Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. In: A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. Cambridge: : Polity 1994. 71–85.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_50347.pdf

401
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the closet. Updated ed. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2008.

402
Margaret W. Conkey and Joan M. Gero. Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 1997;26:411–37.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952529

403
Conkey MW, Spector J. Archaeology and the Study of Gender. Advances in archaeological method and theory 1985;7:1–29.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47162.pdf

404
Gilchrist R. Women’s archaeology? Political feminism, gender theory and historical revision. Antiquity 1991;65:495–501.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293690680?accountid=14511

405
Hill E. Gender-informed archaeology: The priority of definition, the use of analogy, and the multivariate approach. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1998;5:99–128. doi:10.1007/BF02428417

406
Meskell L. Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2001. 187–213.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a482cfcd-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099

407
Sorensen ML. Gender construction through appearance. In: The archaeology of gender: proceedings of the Twenty-second Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary. Calgary: : The Association 1991. 121–8.

408
Alison Wylie. The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender. American Antiquity 1992;57:15–35.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694833

409
Conkey MW. Dwelling at the margins, action at the intersection? Feminist and indigenous archaeologies, 2005. Archaeologies 2005;1:9–59. doi:10.1007/s11759-005-0003-9

410
Margaret W. Conkey. Questioning Theory: Is There a Gender of Theory in Archaeology? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2007;14:285–310.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25702345

411
Dowson TA. Homosexuality, queer theory and archaeology. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000. 283–9.

412
Ericka Engelstad. Much More than Gender. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory;14:217–34.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/25702342?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=much&searchText=more&searchText=than&searchText=gender&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253Dmuch%252Bmore%252Bthan%252Bgender%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj50000249%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D

413
Rosemary A. Joyce. Archaeology of the Body. Annual Review of Anthropology 2005;34:139–58.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25064880

414
Joyce, Rosemary A. Ancient bodies, ancient lives: sex, gender, and archaeology. London: : Thames & Hudson 2008.

415
Crass B. Gender and mortuary analysis. In: Gender and the archaeology of death. Walnut Creek, Md: : AltaMira 2001. 105–18.

416
Folorunso CA. Gender and archaeological site formation: ethnoarchaeological studies in parts of Nigeria. In: Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007. 353–72.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9caf6d6a-7f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

417
Alberti B. Bodies in prehistory: beyond the sex/gender split. In: Global archaeological theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2005. 107–20.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG194_48907.pdf

418
Arnold, Bettina, Wicker, Nancy L. Gender and the archaeology of death. Walnut Creek, Md: : AltaMira 2001.

419
Casella, Eleanor Conlin, Fowler, Chris. The archaeology of plural and changing identities: beyond identification. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum 2005.

420
Conkey MW. Has Feminism Changed Archaeology? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2003;28:867–80. doi:10.1086/345322

421
Costin CL. Exploring the relationship between gender and craft in complex societies: methodological and theoretical issues of gender attribution. In: Gender and archaeology. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 1996. 111–42.

422
Dahlberg, Frances. Woman the gatherer. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1981.

423
Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. London: : Routledge 2005.

424
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig, Díaz-Andreu García, Margarita. Excavating women: a history of women in European archaeology. London: : Routledge 1998.

425
Fowler, Chris. The archaeology of personhood: an anthropological approach. London: : Routledge 2004.

426
Gailey, Christine Ward. Kinship to kingship: gender hierarchy and state formation in the Tongan Islands. 1st ed. Austin, Tex: : University of Texas Press 1987.

427
Gardner, Andrew. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

428
Gero, Joan M., Conkey, Margaret Wright. Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991.

429
Gilchrist, Roberta. Gender and archaeology: contesting the past. London: : Routledge 1999.

430
Gilchrist R. Archaeology and the life course: a time and age for gender. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 142–60.

431
Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis, Pluciennik, Mark. Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2002.

432
Hamilton, Sue, Whitehouse, Ruth, Wright, Katherine I. Archaeology and women: ancient & modern issues. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

433
Jones S. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In: Interpretive archaeology: a reader. London: : Leicester University Press 2000. 444–57.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG194_48813.pdf

434
Kent, Susan Kingsley. Gender in African prehistory. Walnut Creek, Calif: : AltaMira 1998.

435
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Oxford: : Blackwell 1999.

436
Meskell, Lynn, Joyce, Rosemary A. Embodied lives: figuring ancient Maya and Egyptian experience. London: : Routledge 2003.

437
Meskell L, Preucel R. Identities. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 121–41.

438
Morris RC. All Made Up: Performance Theory and the New Anthropology of Sex and Gender. Annual Review of Anthropology 1995;24:567–92. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.003031

439
Rosen-Ayalon, Myriam, Nelson, Sarah M. In pursuit of gender: worldwide archaeological approaches. Walnut Creek, CA: : AltaMira Press 2002.

440
Hughes, Jessica, Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig, Rebay-Salisbury, Katharina. Body parts and bodies whole: changing relations and meanings. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2010.

441
Schmidt, Robert A., Voss, Barbara L. Archaeologies of sexuality. London: : Routledge 2000.

442
Sofaer, Joanna R. The body as material culture: a theoretical osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.

443
Sorensen MLS. Reading dress: the construction of social categories and identities in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European archaeology 1997;5:93–114.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_47065.pdf

444
Sørensen, Marie Louise Stig. Gender archaeology. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2000.

445
Thomas J. Culture and identity. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 431–69.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_65538.pdf

446
Treherne P. The warrior’s beauty: the masculine body and self-identity in Bronze Age Europe. Journal of European archaeology 1995;3:105–44.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCL2028_42382

447
Tringham R. Engendered places in prehistory. Gender, Place & Culture 1994;1:169–203. doi:10.1080/09663699408721209

448
Whitehouse, Ruth, Accordia Research Institute, University College, London. Gender and Italian archaeology: challenging the stereotypes. London: : Accordia Research Institute 1998.

449
Wright RP. Women’s labour and pottery production in prehistory. In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 194–223.

450
Wright, Rita P. Gender and archaeology. Philadelphia: : University of Pennsylvania Press 1996.

451
Wylie A. Gender theory and the archaeological record: why is there no archaeology of gender? In: Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 31–54.

452
Wylie A. Doing Archaeology as a Feminist: Introduction. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2007;14:209–16. doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9034-4

453
Kohl PL. NATIONALISM AND ARCHAEOLOGY: On the Constructions of Nations and the Reconstructions of the Remote Past. Annual Review of Anthropology 1998;27:223–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.223

454
Leone MP, Mullins PR, Creveling MC, et al. Can an African-American historical archaeology be an alternative voice? In: Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. London: : Routledge 1994. 110–24.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fbf6ad87-f812-e811-80cd-005056af4099

455
Meskell L. The intersections of identity and politics in archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 2002;31:279–301. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085457

456
Parker Pearson M, Pryor F. Visitors and viewers welcome? In: Archaeological resource management in the UK: an introduction. Stroud: : Sutton 2006. 316–27.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a4c6e91b-4e0f-ee11-87dd-a04a5e5d2f8d

457
Watkins J. THROUGH WARY EYES: Indigenous Perspectives on Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 2005;34:429–49. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120540

458
Arjun Appadurai. The Past as a Scarce Resource. Man 1981;16:201–19.https://doi.org/10.2307/2801395

459
Arnold B. The past as propaganda: totalitarian archaeology in Nazi Germany. Antiquity 1990;64:464–78.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293750511?accountid=14511

460
Banks, Iain, O’Sullivan, Jerry, Atkinson, John A., et al. Nationalism and archaeology: Scottish Archaeological Forum. Glasgow: : Cruithne Press 1996.

461
Reinhard Bernbeck and Susan Pollock. Ayodhya, Archaeology, and Identity. Current Anthropology 1996;37:138–42.https://www.jstor.org/stable/2744239

462
Bernbeck R, Pollock S. The political economy of archaeological practice and the production of heritage in the Middle East. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 335–52.

463
Champion, T. C., Díaz-Andrea, Marguerita. Nationalism and archaeology in Europe. London: : UCL Press 1996.

464
Chippindale, Christopher. Who owns Stonehenge? London: : Batsford 1990.

465
Clack, Timothy, Brittain, Marcus. Archaeology and the media. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

466
Coombes, Annie E. Reinventing Africa: museums, material culture and popular imagination in late Victorian and Edwardian England. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1994.

467
Fagan, Garrett G. Archaeological fantasies: how pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public. London: : Routledge 2006.

468
Fforde, Cressida, Hubert, Jane, Turnbull, Paul. The dead and their possessions: repatriation in principle, policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.

469
Fowler, P. J. The past in contemporary society: then, now. London: : Routledge 1992.

470
Fowler D, Jolie E, Salter M. Archaeological ethics in context and practice. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, MD: : AltaMira Press 2008. 409–22.

471
Gathercole, Peter, Lowenthal, David. The politics of the past. London: : Routledge 1994.

472
Gosden C. Postcolonial archaeology. Issues of culture, identity and knowledge. In: Archaeological theory today. Cambridge: : Polity 2001. 241–61.https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451

473
Gosden C. The past and foreign countries: colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 161–78.https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

474
Fawcett, Clare P., Matsunaga, John M., Habu, Junko. Evaluating multiple narratives: beyond nationalist, colonialist, imperialist archaeologies. New York: : Springer 2008.

475
Hingley, Richard. Roman officers and English gentlemen: the imperial origins of Roman archaeology. New York: : Routledge 2000.

476
Holtorf, Cornelius. Archaeology is a brand: the meaning of archaeology in contemporary popular culture. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

477
Holtorf, Cornelius. From Stonehenge to Las Vegas: archaeology as popular culture. Walnut Creek, CA: : Altamira Press 2005.

478
James, Simon. The Atlantic Celts: ancient people or modern invention? London: : British Museum Press 1999.

479
Gareth Jones D, Harris RJ. Archeological Human Remains. Current Anthropology 1998;39:253–64. doi:10.1086/204723

480
Jones S. Making places, resisting displacement: conflicting national and local identities in Scotland. In: The politics of heritage: the legacies of ‘race’. London: : Routledge 2005. 94–114.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=45c4a144-f979-ed11-ac20-a04a5e5d2f8d

481
Kehoe, Alice Beck. Controversies in archaeology. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2008.

482
Kohl, Philip L., Fawcett, Clare. Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511558214

483
Layton, Robert. Who needs the past?: indigenous values and archaeology. London: : Routledge 1994.

484
Layton, Robert. Conflict in the archaeology of living traditions. London: : Routledge 1994.

485
Ucko, Peter J., Layton, Robert, Shennan, Stephen, et al. A future for archaeology: the past in the present. London: : UCL Press 2006.

486
Leone M, Preucel R. Archaeology in a democratic society: a critical perspective. In: Quandaries and quests: visions of archaeology’s future. [Carbondale, Ill.]: : Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale 1992. 115–35.

487
Lowenthal, David. The past is a foreign country. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.

488
Mandal, D., Ratnagar, Shereen. Ayodhya: archaeology after demolition : a critique of the ‘new’ and ‘fresh’ discoveries. Rev. ed. New Delhi: : Orient Longman 2003.

489
McGuire, Randall H. Archaeology as political action. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2008.

490
McGuire R. Contested pasts: archaeology and Native Americans. In: A companion to social archaeology. Malden, MA.: : Blackwell Pub. Ltd 2004. 374–95.https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/book/10.1002/9780470693605

491
Francis P. McManamon. The Many Publics for Archaeology. American Antiquity 1991;56:121–30.http://www.jstor.org/stable/280977

492
Merriman, Nick. Public archaeology. London: : Routledge 2004.

493
Merriman, Nick. Beyond the glass case: the past, the heritage and the public. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2000.

494
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeology under fire: nationalism, politics and heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. London: : Routledge 1998. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511558214

495
Mizoguchi, Kōji. Archaeology, society and identity in modern Japan. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.

496
Moshenska G. The reburial issue in Britain. Antiquity 2009;83:815–20.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217543017?accountid=14511

497
Murray T. Communication and the importance of disciplinary communities: who owns the past? In: Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda? Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993. 105–16.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d7c5c330-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

498
Ratnagar S. Archaeology at the Heart of a Political Confrontation: The Case of Ayodhya. Current Anthropology 2004;45:239–59. doi:10.1086/381044

499
Reid, Donald M. Whose pharaohs?: archaeology, museums, and Egyptian national identity from Napoleon to World War I. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2002.

500
Scarre, Geoffrey, Scarre, Christopher. The ethics of archaeology: philosophical perspectives on archaeological practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2006.

501
Schablitsky, Julie M. Box office archaeology: refining Hollywood’s portrayals of the past. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2007.

502
Seidemann, Ryan M. Bones of Contention: A Comparative Examination of Law Governing Human Remains from Archaeological Contexts in Formerly Colonial Countries. Louisiana Law Review 2004;64.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/louilr64&id=555&collection=journals&index=journals/louilr#555

503
Silberman, Neil Asher. Between past and present: archaeology, ideology, and nationalism in the modern Middle East. New York: : H. Holt 1989.

504
Silberman NA. Promised lands and chosen peoples: the politics and poetics of archaeological narrative. In: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. 249–62.https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511558214

505
Smith L. The repatriation of human remains - problem or opportunity? Antiquity 2004;78:404–13.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217573465?accountid=14511

506
Smith, Laurajane. Archaeological theory and the politics of cultural heritage. London: : Routledge 2004.

507
Thomas, David Hurst. Skull wars: Kennewick man, archaeology, and the battle for Native American identity. New York, N.Y.: : Basic Books 2000.

508
Tilley CY. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In: Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 104–16.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f996f2f6-5936-e711-80c9-005056af4099

509
Tilley CY. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In: Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 104–16.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f996f2f6-5936-e711-80c9-005056af4099

510
Trigger BG. Hyper-relativism, responsibility and the Social Sciences. In: Artifacts & ideas: essays in archaeology. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Transaction 2003. 113–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=32142085-6b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

511
Bruce G. Trigger. Alternative Archaeologies: Nationalist, Colonialist, Imperialist. Man 1984;19:355–70.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802176

512
Bruce G. Trigger. Archaeology and the Image of the American Indian. American Antiquity 1980;45:662–76.http://www.jstor.org/stable/280140

513
Trigger BG. Romanticism, nationalism and archaeology. In: Nationalism, politics, and the practice of archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. 263–79.

514
Ucko, Peter J., Ascherson, Neal. Academic freedom and apartheid: the story of the World Archaeological Congress. London: : Duckworth 1987.

515
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip, Vitelli, Karen D. Archaeological ethics. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: : Altamira 2006.

516
Wylie A. The integrity of narratives: deliberate practice, pluralism and multivocality. In: Evaluating multiple narratives: beyond nationalist, colonialist, imperialist archaeologies. New York: : Springer 2008. 201–12.https://link-springer-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5

517
Wylie A. Alternative histories. Epistemic disunity and political integrity. In: Making alternative histories: the practice of archaeology and history in non-Western settings. Santa Fe, N.M: : School of American Research Press 1995. 255–72.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=762ee3e6-f0b3-ec11-a99b-0050f2f06092

518
Zimmerman, Larry J., Vitelli, Karen D., Hollowell-Zimmer, Julie. Ethical issues in archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA: : Altamira Press 2003.

Bibliography for ARCLG194: Themes, Thought and Theory in World Archaeology: Current Topics: Katherine Irene Wright BETA