Bibliography for ARCLG107: Technology and Analysis of Archaeological Material: Marcos Martinon-Torres

1
STRAND A - TECHNOLOGY WITHIN SOCIETY .

2
Appadurai, Arjun. The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.

3
Bentley RA, Maschner HDG, Chippindale C, editors. Handbook of archaeological theories. Lanham, Md: : AltaMira Press 2008. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780759113602

4
Caple, Chris. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: : Routledge 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203409060

5
Ewen, Charles Robin. Artifacts. Walnut Creek, CA: : AltaMira Press 2003.

6
Hodder I, Wiley InterScience (Online service). Entangled: an archaeology of the relationships between humans and things. Malden, MA: : Wiley-Blackwell 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118241912

7
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: : Routledge 2007.

8
Jones A. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice. Archaeometry 2004;46:327–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x

9
Kingery, W. D. Learning from things: method and theory of material culture studies. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1996.

10
Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.

11
Lemonnier P. The study of material culture today: Toward an anthropology of technical systems. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology Published Online First: 1986. doi:0278-4165(86)90012-7

12
Martinón-Torres M, Killick D. Archaeological Theories and Archaeological Sciences. The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Theory Published Online First: 2015. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.013.004

13
Miller, Heather Margaret-Louise. Archaeological approaches to technology. Amsterdam: : Elsevier/Academic Press 2007.

14
Nanoglou S. Qualities of Humanness: Material Aspects of Greek Neolithic Anthropomorphic Imagery. Journal of Material Culture 2008;13:311–34. doi:10.1177/1359183508095498

15
Orton C, Hughes M. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

16
Olsen, Bjørnar. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.

17
Schick KD, Toth NP. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: : Phoenix 1995.

18
Schiffer, Michael B., Miller, Andrea R. The material life of human beings: artifacts, behavior, and communication. London: : Routledge 1999.

19
Sigaut F. Technology. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 420–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=80c47916-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099

20
Tilley, Christopher Y. Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430

21
Thornton C. Archaeometallurgy. In: Metals and societies: studies in honour of Barbara S. Ottaway. Bonn: : R. Habelt 2009. 25–33.

22
Boivin, Nicole. Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008.

23
Conneller C. An archaeology of materials: substantial transformations in early prehistoric Europe. New York: : Routledge 2011.

24
Dant, Tim. Material culture in the social world: values, activities, lifestyles. Buckingham: : Open Univeristy Press 1999.

25
Donald M, Hurcombe LM. Gender and material culture in historical perspective. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 2000.

26
Henare, Amiria J. M., Holbraad, Martin, Wastell, Sari. Thinking through things: theorising artefacts ethnographically. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203088791

27
Hallam E, Ingold T, editors. Making and growing: anthropological studies of organisms and artefacts. Farnham, Surrey, England: : Ashgate 2014.

28
Lubar, Steven D., Kingery, W. D. History from things: essays on material culture. Washington: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1993.

29
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006.

30
Miller, Daniel. Materiality. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2005.

31
Olsen B. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.

32
Andrefsky, William. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.

33
Henderson, Julian. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000.

34
Orton, Clive, Hughes, Mike. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

35
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.

36
Schick, Kathy Diane, Toth, Nicholas Patrick. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: : Phoenix 1993.

37
Ingold T. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 2007;14. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002127

38
Kopytoff I. The cultural biology of things: commoditization as a process. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 64–94.http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb32141.0001.001;didno=heb32141.0001.001;node=heb32141.0001.001%3A5.2;view=image;seq=00000079

39
Meskell, Lynn. Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Oxford: : Berg 2004.

40
Meskell L. Introduction, object orientations. In: Archaeologies of materiality. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006. 1–17. doi:10.1002/9780470774052.ch1

41
Olsen, Bjørnar. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.

42
Adams WY. Archaeological classification: theory versus practice. Antiquity 1988;56:40–56.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293842480?accountid=14511

43
Brian Hayden. Are Emic Types Relevant to Archaeology? Ethnohistory 1984;31:79–92.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/482057

44
Sørensen M. ‘Paradigm lost’ - on the state of typology within archaeological theory. In: Paradigm found: archaeological theory present, past and future : essays in honour of Even NeustupnÃ½. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2015. 84–94.

45
Adams, William Yewdale, Adams, Ernest W. Archaeological typology and practical reality: a dialectical approach to artifact classification and sorting. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991.

46
Barrett JC. Bronze Age pottery and the problem of classification. In: Papers on the prehistoric archaeology of Cranborne Chase. Oxford: : Oxbow 1991. 201–30.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=57e50199-1364-e811-80cd-005056af4099

47
Biers, William R. Art, artefacts, and chronology in classical archaeology. London: : Routledge 1992.

48
Lewis R. Binford. Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 1962;28:217–25.http://www.jstor.org/stable/278380

49
Binford LR. Archaeological perspectives. In: New perspectives in archaeology. Chicago: : Aldine 1968. 155–86.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2168a4ec-4d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

50
Michael S. Bisson. Nineteenth Century Tools for Twenty-First Century Archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic Typology of François Bordes Must Be Replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2000;7:1–48.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177411?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

51
Buck, Caitlin E., Millard, Andrew. Tools for constructing chronologies: crossing disciplinary boundaries. London: : Springer 2004.

52
Carver MOH. Theory and practice in urban pottery seriation. Journal of Archaeological Science 1985;12:353–66. doi:0305-4403(85)90064-0

53
Chapman WR. Arranging ethnology: A.H.L.F. Pitt Rivers and the typological tradition. In: Objects and others: essays on museums and material culture. Madison, Wis: : University of Wisconsin Press 1985. 15–48.https://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780299103231/9780299103231-3.pdf

54
Clarke DL, Chapman B. Analytical archaeology. 2nd ed. London: : Methuen 1978.

55
Cumberpatch CG. Towards a phenomenological approach to medieval pottery. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 125–52.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=039ae9df-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

56
Dunnell RC. Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification. Advances in archaeological method and theory 1986;9:149–207.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20210077

57
Fish PR. Consistency in Archaeological Measurement and Classification: A Pilot Study. American Antiquity 1978;43:86–9.http://www.jstor.org/stable/279635

58
Gräslund, Bo. The birth of prehistoric chronology: dating methods and dating systems in nineteenth-century Scandinavian archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.

59
Ian Hodder. The Narrative and Rhetoric of Material Culture Sequences. World Archaeology 1993;25:268–82.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/124819?&Search=yes&searchText=narrative&searchText=sequences&searchText=rhetoric&searchText=culture&searchText=material&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DThe%252Bnarrative%252Band%252Brhetoric%252Bof%252Bmaterial%252Bculture%252Bsequences%2526Search%253DSearch%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=3&ttl=3322&returnArticleService=showFullText

60
Kempton, Willett. The folk classification of ceramics: a study of cognitive prototypes. New York: : Academic Press 1981.

61
Kleĭn LS. Archaeological typology. Oxford: : B.A.R. 1982.

62
Margolis, Eric, Laurence, Stephen. Creations of the mind: theories of artifacts and their representation. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.

63
Miller D. Artefacts as products of human categorisation processes. In: Symbolic and structural archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 17–25. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558252.003

64
Miller, Daniel. Artefacts as categories: a study of ceramic variability in central India. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.

65
Montelius O, Lindqvist S. Die älteren Kulturperioden im Orient und in Europa I. Stockholm: : Selbstverlag des verfassers 1903.

66
Stephen Plog. Analysis of Style in Artifacts. Annual Review of Anthropology 1983;12:125–42.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2155643

67
Stephen Plog and Jeffrey L. Hantman. Chronology Construction and the Study of Prehistoric Culture Change. Journal of Field Archaeology 1990;17:439–56.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/530005

68
Read, Dwight W. Artifact classification: a conceptual and methodological approach. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.

69
Prudence M. Rice. Rethinking the Ware Concept. American Antiquity 1976;41:538–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/279024

70
Rowley-Conwy P. From Genesis to prehistory: the archaeological Three Age System and its contested reception in Denmark, Britain, and Ireland. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.

71
Sackett J. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1982;:59–112. doi:0278-4165(82)90008-3

72
Schnapp A. Between antiquarians and archaeologists--continuities and ruptures. Antiquity 2002;76:134–40.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217579824?accountid=14511

73
Wendrich W. The World According to Basketry. 1999. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6n42w0rg

74
Wheat JB. Ceramic classification: Bradfield and Shepard, types and varieties. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991. 121–31.

75
White JP, Thomas DH. What mean these stones? Ethnotaxonomic models and archaeological interpretations in the New Guinea Highlands. In: Models in archaeology. London: : Methuen 1972. 275–308.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8ad5028d-5636-e711-80c9-005056af4099

76
Widemann F. Why is archaeometry so boring for archaeologists? In: Archaeological ceramics: papers presented at a seminar on Ceramics as Archaeological Material held at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1982. 29–36.

77
Wylie A. The typology debate. In: Thinking from things: essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2002. 42–56.

78
Benco NL. Worked bone tools: Linking metal artisans and animal processors in medieval Islamic Morocco. Antiquity 2002;76:447–57.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217562124?accountid=14511

79
Schlanger N. The Chaîne Opératoire. In: Archaeology: the key concepts. London: : Routledge 2005. 14–8.https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203491096/startPage/15

80
SILLAR B, TITE MS. THE CHALLENGE OF ‘TECHNOLOGICAL CHOICES’FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE APPROACHES IN ARCHAEOLOGY. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

81
Collins MB. Lithic technology as a means of processual inference. In: Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. The Hague: : Mouton 1975. 15–34.

82
Françoise Audouze. Leroi-Gourhan, a Philosopher of Technique and Evolution. Journal of Archaeological Research 2002;10:277–306.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/41053189

83
Bar‐Yosef O, Van Peer P. The Chaine Operatoire Approach in Middle Paleolithic Archaeology. Current Anthropology 2009;50:103–31. doi:10.1086/592234

84
Binford RL. Hunters in a landscape. In: In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. [London]: : Thames and Hudson 1983. 109–43.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1905bffa-5736-e711-80c9-005056af4099

85
Chanteller C. Lithic technology and the Chaîne Opératoire. In: Prehistoric Britain. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2008. 160–76.

86
Crabtree DE. Comments of lithic technology and experimental archaeology. In: Lithic technology: making and using stone tools. The Hague: : Mouton 1975. 105–13.

87
David N, Kramer C. Studying artifacts: functions, operating sequences, taxonomy. In: Ethnoarchaeology in action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. 138–67. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316036488.007

88
Elizabeth DeMarrais, Luis Jaime Castillo and Timothy Earle. Ideology, Materialization, and Power Strategies. Current Anthropology 1996;37:15–31.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2744153

89
Dobres M-A. Technology’s links and chaînes : the processual unfolding of technique and technician. In: The social dynamics of technology: practice, politics, and world views. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1999. 124–46.

90
Chris Gosden and Yvonne Marshall. The Cultural Biography of Objects. World Archaeology 1999;31:169–78.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/125055

91
Holtorf C. Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. Journal of Material Culture 2002;7:49–71. doi:10.1177/1359183502007001305

92
Hoskins, Janet. Biographical objects: how things tell the stories of people’s lives. New York: : Routledge 1998.

93
Hurcombe L. Plant processing for cordage and textiles using serrated flint edges: new chaines operatoires suggested by ethnographic, archaeological and experimental evidence for bast fibre processing. In: Plant processing form a prehistoric and ethnographic perspective =: Préhistoire et ethnographie du travail des plantes : proceedings of a workshop at Ghent University (Belgium) November 28, 2006. Oxford: : John & Erica Hedges 2007. 41–66.

94
Ingold T. `Tools for the Hand, Language for the Face’: An Appreciation of Leroi-Gourhan’s Gesture and Speech. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 1999;30:411–53. doi:10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00022-9

95
Jeffra CD. Experimental approaches to archaeological ceramics: unifying disparate methodologies with the chaîne opératoire. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 2015;7:141–9. doi:10.1007/s12520-014-0177-4

96
Jennings J, Antrobus KL, Atencio SJ, et al. "Drinking Beer in a Blissful Mood” Alcohol Production, Operational Chains, and Feasting in the Ancient World. Current Anthropology 2005;46:275–303. doi:10.1086/427119

97
Lemonnier, Pierre. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Ann Arbor, Mich: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1992.

98
Lemonnier, Pierre. Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: : Routledge 1993.

99
Lucas G. Case study: the life and times of a Roman jar. In: The archaeology of time. London: : Routledge 2005. 95–113.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45056.pdf

100
Meskell, Lynn. Object worlds in ancient Egypt: material biographies past and present. Oxford: : Berg 2004.

101
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: : Taraxacum 1981.

102
Shanks M. The life of an artefact in an interpretive archaeology. http://documents.stanford.edu/michaelshanks/229

103
Schiffer MB. Behavioral chain analysis: activities, organization and the use of space. In: Behavioral archaeology: first principles. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 103–74.

104
Schlanger N. Mindful technology: unleashing the chaîne opératoire for an archaeology of mind. In: The ancient mind: elements of cognitive archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 143–51. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598388.015

105
Schlanger N, Silclair A. Technology in the Humanities. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:3–167.

106
Skibo JM, Schiffer MB. Understanding artifact variability and change: a behavioral framework. In: Anthropological perspectives on technology. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 2001. 139–49.

107
Vidale M. Operational sequences beyond linearity. In: Papers from the EAA Third Annual Meeting at Ravenna 1997. Oxford: : Archaeopress 1998. 179–84.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45067.pdf

108
Rapp, George Robert. Archaeomineralogy. 2nd ed. Berlin: : Springer 2009.

109
Ashurst, John, Dimes, Francis G., Honeyborne, D. B. Conservation of building and decorative stone: Vol. 1. London: : Butterworths 1990.

110
Bachmann, H. G. The identification of slags from archaeological sites. London: : Institute of Archaeology 1982.

111
Bayley J, Dungworth D, Paynter S. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines: Archaeometallurgy. English Heritage 2001. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications

112
Leo Biek and Justine Bayley. Glass and other Vitreous Materials. World Archaeology 1979;11:1–25.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124331

113
Freestone, Ian, Gaimster, David R. M. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: : British Museum Press 1997.

114
Gleba, Margarita. Textile production in pre-Roman Italy. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2008.

115
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: : Routledge 2007.

116
Orton, Clive, Hughes, Mike. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

117
Paynter S, Dungworth D. Archaeological Evidence for Glassworking. English Heritage 2011. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/glassworkingguidelines/glassworking-guidelines.pdf

118
Thomson, Roy, Mould, Quita. Leather tanneries: the archaeological evidence. London: : Archetype 2011.

119
Tomber, R., Dore, John, English Heritage, et al. The National Roman Fabric Reference Collection: a handbook. London: : Museum of London Archaeology Service 1998.

120
BGS Rock Classification Scheme - British Geological Survey. http://www.bgs.ac.uk/bgsrcs/

121
Archaeological Geology of Ancient Egypt. http://www.eeescience.utoledo.edu/Faculty/Harrell/Egypt/AGRG_Home.html

122
Utilitarian Stones. 2012.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/77t294df#page-1

123
Building Stones. 2012.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fd124g0?query=building%20stones#page-1

124
Pigments through the Ages - detailed pigment histories, recipes. http://www.webexhibits.org/pigments/

125
Mineralogy Database - Mineral Collecting, Localities, Mineral Photos and Data. http://www.mindat.org/

126
Freestone I. Chapter 4: Pliny on Roman glassmaking. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 77–100.http://www.UCL.eblib.com/patron/Read.aspx?p=677776&pg=1

127
Freestone I, Huges M, Stapleton C. The composition and production of Anglo-Saxon glass. In: Catalogue of Anglo-Saxon glass in the British Museum. London: : British Museum 2008. 29–46.http://www.britishmuseum.org/research/publications/research_publications_series/2008/catalogue_of_anglo_saxon_glass.aspx

128
Paynter S, Dungworth D. Archaeological Evidence for Glassworking. English Heritage 2011. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/glassworkingguidelines/glassworking-guidelines.pdf

129
Price, J., Cottam, Sally. Romano-British glass vessels: a handbook. York: : Council for British Archaeology 1998.

130
Strand EA, Frei KM, Gleba M, et al. Old Textiles -- New Possibilities. European Journal of Archaeology 2010;13:149–73. doi:10.1177/1461957110365513

131
Barber, E. J. W. Prehistoric textiles: the development of cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages with special reference to the Aegean. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1991.

132
Jørgensen, Lise Bender. North European textiles until AD 1000. Aarhus: : Aarhus University Press 1992.

133
Gleba, Margarita, Mannering, Ulla. Textiles & textile production in Europe: from prehistory to AD 400. Oxford: : Oxbow 2012.

134
Harris S. Smooth and cool or warm and soft, investigating the properties of cloth in prehistory. In: North European Symposium for Archaeological Textiles X. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009. 112–40.http://www.academia.edu/203730/Smooth_and_cool_or_warm_and_soft_investigating_the_properties_of_cloth_in_prehistory._In_E._Andersson_Strand_M._Gleba_U._Mannering_C._Munkholt_M._Ringgaard_eds._North_European_Symposium_for_Archaeological_Textiles_X._Oxford_Oxbow_Books_Ancient_Textiles_Series_5_pp._140-112

135
Technological examination of Neolithic-Bronze Age pottery from central and southeast Europe and from the Near East. Journal of Archaeological Science Published Online First: 1981. doi:0305-4403(81)90012-1

136
Orton, Clive, Hughes, Mike. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

137
Quinn, Patrick S. Ceramic petrography: the interpretation of archaeological pottery & related artefacts in thin section. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2013.

138
Bachmann, H. G. The identification of slags from archaeological sites. London: : Institute of Archaeology 1982.

139
Bayley J, Dungworth D, Paynter S. Centre for Archaeology Guidelines: Archaeometallurgy. English Heritage 2001. http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications

140
Bayley J, Crossley DW, Ponting M, et al. Metals and metalworking: a research framework for archaeometallurgy. London: : Historical Metallurgy Society 2008.

141
Craddock PT. Early metal mining and production. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1995.

142
Roberts BW, Thornton CP, editors. Archaeometallurgy in global perspective: methods and syntheses. New York: : Springer 2014. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781461490173

143
Andrefsky, William. Lithics: macroscopic approaches to analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.

144
Mesoudi A. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences. University of Chicago Press 2011.

145
Schick, Kathy Diane, Toth, Nicholas Patrick. Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. London: : Phoenix 1993.

146
Whittaker, John C. Flintknapping: making and understanding stone tools. Austin: : University of Texas Press 1994.

147
Eerkens JW, Lipo CP. Cultural transmission, copying errors, and the generation of variation in material culture and the archaeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2005;24:316–34. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.08.001

148
Brian Hayden. Practical and Prestige Technologies: The Evolution of Material Systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1998;5:1–55.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177377

149
Martinón-Torres M, Uribe-Villegas MA. Technology and Culture in the Invention of Lost-wax Casting in South America: an Archaeometric and Ethnoarchaeological Perspective. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2015;25:377–90. doi:10.1017/S0959774314001164

150
Bailey GN. Concepts, time-scales and explanations in economic prehistory. In: Economic archaeology: towards an integration of ecological and social approaches. Oxford: : B.A.R. 1981. 97–117.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45090.pdf

151
Barnett, William, Hoopes, John W. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Washington [D.C.]: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1995.

152
Basalla, George. The evolution of technology. Cambridge University Press 1988.

153
Bayley J. Innovation in later medieval urban metalworking. Historical metallurgy: journal of the Historical Metallurgy Society 1996;30:67–71.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45091.pdf

154
Blackman MJ, Stein GJ, Vandiver PB. The Standardization Hypothesis and Ceramic Mass Production: Technological, Compositional, and Metric Indexes of Craft Specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria. American Antiquity 1993;58:60–80.http://www.jstor.org/stable/281454

155
Charlton MF, Crew P, Rehren T, et al. Explaining the evolution of ironmaking recipes – An example from northwest Wales. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2010;29:352–67. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.05.001

156
Costin C. The impact of the Inca conquest on local technology in the Upper Mantaro Valley, Peru. In: What’s new?: a closer look at the process of innovation. London: : Unwin Hyman 1989. 107–39.

157
Crossley D. The English glassmaker and his search for materials in the 16th and 17th centuries. In: The prehistory & history of glassmaking technology. Westerville, OH: : American Ceramic Society 1998. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5e208207-d864-e811-80cd-005056af4099

158
Fitzhugh B. Risk and Invention in Human Technological Evolution. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2001;20:125–67. doi:10.1006/jaar.2001.0380

159
Brian Hayden. Practical and Prestige Technologies: The Evolution of Material Systems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1998;5:1–55.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177377

160
Henderson et al. J. Experiment and innovation: early Islamic industry at al-Raqqa, Syria. Antiquity 2005;79:130–45.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=505112931&site=ehost-live&scope=site

161
Humphris J, Martinón-Torres M, Rehren T, et al. Variability in single smelting episodes – a pilot study using iron slag from Uganda. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:359–69. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.020

162
Knecht H. The role of innovation in changing early upper paleolithic organic projectile technologies - ResearchGate. Techniques et Culture 1991;:115–44.http://www.researchgate.net/publication/30453447_The_role_of_innovation_in_changing_early_upper_paleolithic_organic_projectile_technologies

163
Lechtman H. Andean value systems and the development of prehistoric metallurgy. Technology and culture 1984;25:1–36.http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/tech/

164
Lesick, Kurtis, University of Calgary. Eureka: the archaeology of innovation & science : proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary. Calgary: : Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary 2002.

165
Loney HL. Society and Technological Control: A Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies. American Antiquity 2000;65:646–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694420

166
Martinón-Torres M. Inside Solomon’s House: An Archaeological Study of the Old Ashmolean Chymical Laboratory in Oxford*. Ambix 2012;59:22–48. doi:10.1179/174582312X13296104891436

167
Martinon-Torres M, Rehren T. Post-medieval crucible productionand distribution: a study of materials and materialities. Archaeometry 2009;51:49–74.http://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/people/staff/rehren/usercontent_profile/MMTRehrenMaterialityCruciblesAmetry51.pdf

168
Mellars P. Technological changes across the Middle-upper Palaeolithic transition: economic, social and cognitive perspectives. In: The Human revolution: behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1989. 338–65.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=697b38f3-ba64-e811-80cd-005056af4099

169
Moorey PR. The mobility of artisans and opportunities for technology transfer between Western Asia and Egypt in the Late Bronze Age. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001. 1–14.

170
Margaret C. Nelson. The Study of Technological Organization. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:57–100.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20170213

171
Michael J. O’Brien, Thomas D. Holland, Robert J. Hoard and Gregory L. Fox. Evolutionary Implications of Design and Performance Characteristics of Prehistoric Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1994;1:259–304.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177313

172
Raymond, Robert. Out of the fiery furnace: the impact of metals on the history of mankind. University Park: : Pennsylvania State UP 1986.

173
Rehder JE. Blowpipes versus bellows in ancient metallurgy. Journal of Field Archaeology 1994;21.http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/maney/jfa/1994/00000021/00000003/art00005

174
Rehren T, Martinon-Torres M. Chapter 9: Naturam ars imitata: European brassmaking between craft and science. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 167–88.http://www.UCL.eblib.com/patron/Read.aspx?p=677776&pg=1

175
Rehren T, Pusch E, Herold A. Glass coloring works within a copper-centered industrial complex in Late Bronze Age Egypt. In: The prehistory & history of glassmaking technology. Westerville, OH: : American Ceramic Society 1998. 227–50.http://www.academia.edu/1082340/Glass_coloring_works_within_a_copper-centered_industrial_complex_in_Late_Bronze_Age_Egypt

176
Roberts BW, RadivojeviÄ M. Invention as a Process: Pyrotechnologies in Early Societies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2015;25:299–306. doi:10.1017/S0959774314001188

177
Roux V. Ceramic Standardization and Intensity of Production: Quantifying Degrees of Specialization. American Antiquity 2003;68:768–82.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3557072

178
Roux V. Technological innovations and developmental trajectories: social factors as evolutionary forces. In: Innovation in cultural systems: contributions from evolutionary anthropology. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2010. 217–34.

179
Schiffer MB. The explanation of long-term technological change. In: Anthropological perspectives on technology. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 2001. 215–35.

180
Michael Brian Schiffer. The Devil Is in the Details: The Cascade Model of Invention Processes. American Antiquity 2005;70:485–502.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035310

181
Schiffer, Michael B. Studying technological change: a behavioral approach. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2011.

182
S. J. Shennan and J. R. Wilkinson. Ceramic Style Change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity 2001;66:577–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694174

183
Shennan, Stephen. Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London: : Thames & Hudson 2002.

184
Shennan S. Long-term trajectories of technological change. In: Richerson PJ, Christiansen MH, eds. Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language and religion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 2013. 143–55.

185
Shortland AJ. Hopeful monsters? Invention and innovation in the archaeological record. In: Invention and innovation: the social context of technological change, 2: Egypt, the Aegean and the Near East, 1650-1150 BC. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2004. 1–11.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=466f3fbb-b764-e811-80cd-005056af4099

186
Torrence, Robin, Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der. What’s new?: a closer look at the process of innovation. London: : Unwin Hyman 1989.

187
Van der Leeuw SE, Papousek DA, Coudart A. Technical traditions and unquestioned assumptions : the case of pottery in Michoacan. Techniques & culture Published Online First: 1992. doi:10.4000/tc.691

188
David Wengrow. The Evolution of Simplicity: Aesthetic Labour and Social Change in the Neolithic Near East. World Archaeology 2001;33:168–88.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/827897

189
Cathy Lynne Costin. Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:1–56.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20170212

190
Peacock DP. Towards a model for Roman pottery studies. In: Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London: : Longman 1982. 6–11.

191
Katherine A. Spielmann. Feasting, Craft Specialization, and the Ritual Mode of Production in Small-Scale Societies. American Anthropologist 2002;104:195–207.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/683770

192
M. James Blackman, Gil J. Stein and Pamela B. Vandiver. The Standardization Hypothesis and Ceramic Mass Production: Technological, Compositional, and Metric Indexes of Craft Specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria. American Antiquity 1993;58:60–80.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/281454

193
Burri E. Production and use: temper as a marker of domestic production in the case of two middle Neolithic villages in Concise. In: Archaeometric and archaeological approaches to ceramics: papers presented at EMAC ’05, 8th European meeting on ancient ceramics, Lyon 2005. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2007. 33–9.

194
Castanzo RA. Ceramics on the Side: Pottery Making as an Augmentation of Household Economy in the Valley of Puebla during the Formative Period. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 2009;19:133–47. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2009.01017.x

195
Cathy Lynne Costin. The Use of Ethnoarchaeology for the Archaeological Study of Ceramic Production. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2000;7:377–403.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177427

196
Freestone I. Glass production in Late Antiquity and the Early Islamic period : a geochemical perspective. In: Geomaterials in cultural heritage. London: : The Geological Society 2006. 201–16.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=51291be6-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

197
Freestone I. Pliny on Roman glassmaking. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 77–100.http://www.ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=677776

198
Freestone I, Price J, Cartwright C. The batch: its recognition and significance. In: Annales du 17e Congrès de l’Association Internationale pour l’Histoire du Verre, Anvers, 2006 =: Annales of the 17th Congress of the International Association for the History of Glass, 2006, Antwerp. Antwerp: : University Press Antwerp 2009. 130–5.http://www.academia.edu/3122507/The_Batch_and_its_Significance

199
Freestone, Ian, Gaimster, David R. M. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: : British Museum Press 1997.

200
Haines HR, Feinman GM, Nicholas LM. HOUSEHOLD ECONOMIC SPECIALIZATION AND SOCIAL DIFFERENTIATION: The stone-tool assemblage at El Palmillo, Oaxaca. Ancient Mesoamerica 2004;15:251–66. doi:10.1017/S0956536104040155

201
Henderson J, McLoughlin SD, McPhail DS. Radical changes in Islamic glass technology: evidence for conservatism and experimentation with new glass recipes from early and middle Islamic Raqqa, Syria. Archaeometry 2004;46:439–68. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00167.x

202
Henderson et al. J. Experiment and innovation: early Islamic industry at al-Raqqa, Syria. Antiquity 2005;79:130–45.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=505112931&site=ehost-live&scope=site

203
Hodder, Ian, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005.

204
Humphris J, Martinón-Torres M, Rehren T, et al. Variability in single smelting episodes – a pilot study using iron slag from Uganda. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:359–69. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.020

205
Li XJ. Crossbows and imperial craft organisation: the bronze triggers of China’s Terracotta Army. Antiquity 2014;88:126–40.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=94949342&site=ehost-live&scope=site

206
Martinón-Torres M, Li XJ, Bevan A, et al. Forty Thousand Arms for a Single Emperor: From Chemical Data to the Labor Organization Behind the Bronze Arrows of the Terracotta Army. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2014;21:534–62. doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9158-z

207
Peacock, D. P. S., University of Southampton. Rome in the desert: a symbol of power. Southampton: : University of Southampton 1992.

208
Poblome J, Degryse P, Viaene W, et al. The Concept of a Pottery Production Centre. An Archaeometrical Contribution from Ancient Sagalassos. Journal of Archaeological Science 2002;29:873–82. doi:10.1006/jasc.2001.0756

209
Rehren T, Pusch E, Herold A. Glass coloring works within a copper-centered industrial complex in Late Bronze Age Egypt. In: The prehistory & history of glassmaking technology. Westerville, OH: : American Ceramic Society 1998. 227–50.http://www.academia.edu/1082340/Glass_coloring_works_within_a_copper-centered_industrial_complex_in_Late_Bronze_Age_Egypt

210
Rehren T, Pusch E, Herold A. Qantir-Piramesses and the organisation of the Egyptian glass industry. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001. 223–38.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45094.pdf

211
Rehren T, Martinon-Torres M. Chapter 9: Naturam ars imitata: European brassmaking between craft and science. In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 167–88.http://www.ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=677776

212
Prudence M. Rice, William Y. Adams, Joseph W. Ball, Whitney M. Davis, Timothy Earle, Robert E. Fry, Ian Hodder, L. R. V. Joesink-Mandeville, Charles C. Kolb, Masae Nishimura, Yasushi Kojo, Miguel Rivera Dorado, Barbara L. Stark and Sander E. Van Der Leeuw. Evolution of Specialized Pottery Production: A Trial Model [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology 1981;22:219–40.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2742199

213
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:165–202.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/41053131

214
Prudence M. Rice. Late Classic Maya Pottery Production: Review and Synthesis. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2009;16:117–56.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/25653117

215
Valentine Roux. Ceramic Standardization and Intensity of Production: Quantifying Degrees of Specialization. American Antiquity 2003;68:768–82. doi:10.2307/3557072

216
Shennan S. Cost, benefit and value in the organization of early European copper production. Antiquity 1999;73:352–63.http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9434845&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0003598X0008830X

217
Shortland AJ. The Number, Extent and Distribution of the Vitreous Materials Workshops at Amarna. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2000;19:115–34. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00104

218
Shortland A, Nicholson P, Jackson C. Glass and faience at Amarna: different methods of both supply for production and subsequent distribution. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001.

219
Jones S. Nations, cultures and types: dismantling archaeological discourses of the Orcadian Neolithic and beyond. In: Auf der Suche nach Identitaten: Volk, Stamm, Kultur, Ethnos : internationale Tagung der UniversitÃ¤t Leipzig vom 8.-9. Dezember 2000 im Rahmen des Sonderforschungsbereiches 417 ‘Regionenbezogene Identifikationsprozesse, das Beispiel Sachsen’ und des Teilprojektes A5 der Professur fÃ¼r Ur- und FrÃ¼hgeschichte ‘Ethnogenese und Traditionskonstruktion, archÃ¤ologische Quellen und ihre Deutungen in der Historiographie des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts’. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2007. 81–92.

220
Dolfini A. The function of Chalcolithic metalwork in Italy: an assessment based on use-wear analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 2011;38:1037–49. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.11.025

221
Gramsch A. Vergleichen als historische Methode. Analogien in den Archäologien. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2000.

222
Goodale N, Otis H, Andrefsky W, et al. Sickle blade life-history and the transition to agriculture: an early Neolithic case study from Southwest Asia. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010;37:1192–201. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.017

223
Ickerodt U. Einführung in das Grundproblem des archäologisch-kulturhistorischen Vergleichens und Deutens. Frankfurt, Peter Lang 2010. http://www.peterlang.com/index.cfm?event=cmp.ccc.seitenstruktur.detailseiten&seitentyp=produkt&pk=56299&cid=534&concordeid=59799

224
Bruce A. Jones. Use-Wear Analysis of White Mountain Redwares at Grasshopper Pueblo, Arizona. Kiva 1989;54:353–60.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/30247208

225
Lemorini C, Nunziante Cesaro S, editors. An integration of the use-wear and residue analysis for the identification of the function of archaeological stone tools: proceedings of the international workshop, Rome, March 5th-7th, 2012. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2014.

226
Longo L, Skakun NN, Congress Prehistoric technology: 40 years later, et al. ‘Prehistoric technology’ 40 years later: functional studies and the Russian legacy. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2008.

227
López Varela SL, van Gijn A, Jacobs L. De-mystifying Pottery Production in the Maya Lowlands: Detection of Traces of Use-Wear on Pottery Sherds through Microscopic Analysis and Experimental Replication. Journal of Archaeological Science 2002;29:1133–47. doi:10.1006/jasc.2002.0760

228
Marreiros JM, Gibaja Bao JF, Ferreira Bicho N, editors. Use-Wear and Residue Analysis in Archaeology. Cham: : Springer International Publishing 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08257-8

229
Gijn AL van. Flint in focus: lithic biographies in the Neolithic and Bronze Age. Leiden: : Sidestone Press 2010.

230
Gijn AL van, Whittaker JC, Anderson PC, editors. Explaining and exploring diversity in agricultural technology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2014.

231
Skibo JM. Pottery function: a use-alteration perspective. New York: : Plenum Press 1992.

232
Carmen J. Commodities, rubbish and treasure: valuing archaeological objects. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:195–207.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_47259.pdf

233
Cochrane EE, Gardner A. Evolutionary and interpretive archaeologies: a dialogue. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2011.

234
Fernández-Götz M. La construcción arqueológica de la etnicidad. Noia: : Toxosoutos 2008.

235
Jones A. Memory and material culture. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.

236
Jones S. The archaeology of ethnicity: constructing identities in the past and present. London: : Routledge 1997.

237
Larick R. Age grading and ethnicity in the style of Loikop (Samburu) spears. World Archaeology 1986;18:269–83. doi:10.1080/00438243.1986.9980003

238
Lillios KT, Tsamis V. Material mnemonics: everyday memory in prehistoric Europe. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2010.

239
Díaz-Andreu García M. The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. London: : Routledge 2005.

240
Olivier L. The Hochdorf ‘princely’ grave and the question of the nature of archaeological funerary assemblages. In: Time and archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 109–38.

241
Olivier L. The dark abyss of time: archaeology and memory. Lanham, Md: : AltaMira Press 2011.

242
Parkinson WA. Tribal boundaries: Stylistic variability and social boundary maintenance during the transition to the Copper Age on the Great Hungarian Plain. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2006;25:33–58. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.06.002

243
Porr M. Palaeolithic Art as Cultural Memory: a Case Study of the Aurignacian Art of Southwest Germany. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2010;20. doi:10.1017/S0959774310000065

244
Sackett JR. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1982;1:59–112. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(82)90008-3

245
S. J. Shennan and J. R. Wilkinson. Ceramic Style Change and Neutral Evolution: A Case Study from Neolithic Europe. American Antiquity 2001;66:577–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694174

246
Sørensen MLS. Gender archaeology. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2000.

247
Tehrani J, Collard M. Investigating cultural evolution through biological phylogenetic analyses of Turkmen textiles. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2002;21:443–63. doi:10.1016/S0278-4165(02)00002-8

248
Van Dyke RM, Alcock SE, editors. Archaeologies of Memory. Oxford, UK: : Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2003. doi:10.1002/9780470774304

249
Wobst HM. Stylistic behaviour and information exchange. In: For the director: research essays in honor of James B. Griffin. Ann Arbor: : Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1997. 317–42.

250
Woodward A. Beads and Beakers: heirlooms and relics in the British Early Bronze Age. Antiquity 2002;76:1040–7. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00091845

251
Appadurai A. Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. In: The social life of things: commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. 3–63. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819582.003

252
Earle T. Exchange systems in prehistory. In: Trade and exchange: archaeological studies from history and prehistory. New York: : Springer 2010. 205–17. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1072-1_13

253
Sahlins M. On the sociology of primitive exchange. In: Stone Age economics. London: : Routledge 1974. 185–275.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_69459.pdf

254
Hughes M. Tracing to source. In: Science and the past. London: : British Museum Press 1991.

255
Wilson L, Pollard AM. The provenance hypothesis. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001. 507–17.

256
Tykot RH. Archaeological provenance studies. In: Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004. 407–32.

257
Bauer AA, Agbe-Davies AS. Rethinking trade as a social activity: an introduction. In: Social archaeologies of trade and exchange: exploring relationships among people, places, and things. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2010. 13–28.http://www.academia.edu/659814/Rethinking_Trade_as_a_Social_Activity_An_Introduction

258
Crump, Thomas. The phenomenon of money. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1981.

259
George Dalton. Theoretical Issues in Economic Anthropology. Current Anthropology 1969;10:63–102.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2740685?&Search=yes&searchText=anthropology&searchText=issues&searchText=Theoretical&searchText=economic&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DTheoretical%252Bissues%252Bin%252Beconomic%252Banthropology%2526acc%253Don%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff&prevSearch=&item=6&ttl=42299&returnArticleService=showFullText

260
John H. Dowling. The Goodfellows vs. the Dalton Gang: The Assumptions of Economic Anthropology. Journal of Anthropological Research 1979;35:292–308.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629904

261
Earle T. Production and exchange in prehistory. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. London: : Routledge 1999. 608–35.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45082.pdf

262
C. A. Gregory. Gifts to Men and Gifts to God: Gift Exchange and Capital Accumulation in Contemporary Papua. Man 1980;15:626–52.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2801537

263
Gregory CA. Exchange and reciprocity. In: Companion encyclopedia of anthropology. London: : Routledge 2002. 911–33.

264
Mauss, Marcel. The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: : Routledge 2002.

265
Polanyi, Karl. Trade and market in the early empires: economies in history and theory. Glencoe, Ill: : Free Press

266
Renfrew C. Trade as action at a distance. In: Ancient civilization and trade. Albuquerque: : University of New Mexico Press 1975. 3–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4d6d7854-7036-e711-80c9-005056af4099

267
Monica L. Smith. The Role of Ordinary Goods in Premodern Exchange. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1999;6:109–35.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20177399

268
Weiner, Annette B. Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1992.

269
Adams NK. Political affinities and economic fluctuations: the evidence from textiles. In: Ancient textiles: production, craft and society : proceedings of the First International Conference on Ancient Textiles, held at Lund, Sweden, and Copenhagen, Denmark, on March 19-23, 2003. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2007. 201–7.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a430ef6a-8236-e711-80c9-005056af4099

270
Bamforth DB, Woodman PC. Tool hoards and Neolithic use of the landscape in north-eastern Ireland. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2004;23:21–44. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2004.00200.x

271
Barrett JC, Needham SP. Production, circulation and exchange: problems in the interpretation of Bronze Age bronzework. In: The Archaeology of context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: recent trends. Sheffield: : Department of Archaeology and Prehistory, University of Sheffield 1988. 127–40.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45069.pdf

272
Bell C. Wheels within wheels? A view of Mycenaean trade from the Levantine emporia. In: Emporia: Aegeans in the central and eastern Mediterranean : proceedings of the 10th International Aegean Conference/10e Rencontre égéenne internationale, Athens, Italian School of Archaeology, 14-18 April 2004. Liège: : Université de Liège, Histoire de l’art et archéologie de la Grèce antique 2005. 363–70.

273
Bradley, Richard, Edmonds, M. R. Interpreting the axe trade: production and exchange in Neolithic Britain. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.

274
Clough, T. H. McK., Cummins, W. A. Stone axe studies: Volume 2: The petrology of prehistoric stone implements from the British Isles. London: : Council for British Archaeology 1988.

275
Cooney, Gabriel, Mandal, Stephen, Byrnes, Emmet, et al. The Irish Stone Axe Project: Monograph I. Bray: : Wordwell 1998.

276
Cochrane EE, Neff H. Investigating compositional diversity among Fijian ceramics with laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): implications for interaction studies on geologically similar islands. Journal of Archaeological Science 2006;33:378–90. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.003

277
Crawford, Michael H. Coinage and money under the Roman Republic: Italy and the Mediterranean economy. London: : Methuen 1985.

278
Creighton, John. Coins and power in late Iron Age Britain. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.

279
Dietler M. Rituals of commensality and the politics of state formation in the ‘Princely’ societies of Early Iron Age Europe. In: Les princes de la protohistoire et l’émergence de l’Etat: actes de la table ronde internationale organisée par le Centre Jean Bérard et l’Ecole française de Rome, Naples, 27-29 octobre 1994. Naples: : Centre J. Bérard 1999. 135–52.

280
Dietler, Michael. Archaeologies of colonialism: consumption, entanglement, and violence in ancient Mediterranean France. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2010.

281
Dillian, Carolyn D., White, Carolyn L. Trade and exchange: archaeological studies from history and prehistory. New York: : Springer 2010.

282
Edmonds, M. R. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: : Routledge 1995.

283
Frankenstein S, Rowlands M. The Internal Structure and regional Context of Early Iron Age Society in South-Western Germany. In: Social transformations in archaeology: global and local perspectives. London: : Routledge 1998.

284
Philip Grierson. Commerce in the Dark Ages: A Critique of the Evidence. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 1959;9:123–40.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3678808

285
Kenneth G. Hirth. Political Economy and Archaeology: Perspectives on Exchange and Production. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:203–39.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053132

286
Ian Hodder. Regression Analysis of Some Trade and Marketing Patterns. World Archaeology 1974;6:172–89.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124001

287
Hodder, Ian, Orton, Clive. Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1976.

288
Christopher Howgego. The Supply and Use of Money in the Roman World 200 B.C. to A.D. 300. The Journal of Roman Studies 1992;82:1–31.http://www.jstor.org/stable/301282

289
Lo Cascio E. How did the Romans view their coinage and its function? In: Coin finds and coin use in the Roman world: the thirteenth Oxford Symposium on Coinage and Monetary History, 25.-27.3.1993 : a NATO advanced research workshop. Berlin: : Gebr. Mann Verlag 1996. 273–87.

290
Minc LD. Monitoring regional market systems in prehistory: Models, methods, and metrics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2006;25:82–116. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.09.003

291
Needham S. Displacement and exchange in archaeological methodology. In: Trade and exchange in prehistoric Europe: proceedings of a conference held at the University of Bristol, April 1992. Oxford: : published by Oxbow Books in association with the Prehistoric Society and the Société préhistorique française 1993. 161–9.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d834d987-1564-e811-80cd-005056af4099

292
Parkinson WA. Tribal boundaries: Stylistic variability and social boundary maintenance during the transition to the Copper Age on the Great Hungarian Plain. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2006;25:33–58. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2005.06.002

293
Peacock, D. P. S., Williams, D. F. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. London: : Longman 1986.

294
Perlés C. Systems of exchange and organization of production in Neolithic Greece. Journal of Mediterranean archaeology 1992;5:115–64. doi:10.1558/jmea.v5i2.115

295
Stein GJ, Hollander D, Schwartz M. Reconstructing Mesopotamian Exchange Networks in the 4th Millennium BC : Geochemical and Archaeological Analyses of Bitumen Artifacts from Hacinebi Tepe, Turkey. Paléorient 1999;25:67–82. doi:10.3406/paleo.1999.989

296
Shennan S. Commodities, transactions and growth in the Central European Early Bronze Age. European journal of archaeology 1993;1:59–72.http://metalib.ucl.ac.uk:9003/sfx_local?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:opac_856&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=963017837284&svc_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:sch_svc&

297
Sherratt S. Eppur si muove: Pots, markets, and values in the second-millennium Mediterranean. In: The complex past of pottery: production, circulation and consumption of Mycenaean and Greek pottery (sixteenth to early fifth centuries BC) : proceedings of the ARCHON international conference, held in Amsterdam, 8-9 November 1996. Amsterdam: : J.C. Gieben 1999. 163–211.

298
Sherratt AG, Sherratt ES. From luxuries to commodities: The nature of Mediterranean Bronze Age trading systems. In: Bronze age trade in the Mediterranean: papers presented at the Conference held at Rewley House, Oxford, in December 1989. Jonsered: : Åstrom 1991. 351–86.

299
Sillar B. Reputable pots and disreputable potters: Individual and community choice in present-day pottery production and exchange in the Andes. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 1–20.

300
Blinkhorn P, Cumberpatch CG. Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997.

301
Van Der Leuw S. Some notes from the potter’s point of view. In: The complex past of pottery: production, circulation and consumption of Mycenaean and Greek pottery (sixteenth to early fifth centuries BC) : proceedings of the ARCHON international conference, held in Amsterdam, 8-9 November 1996. Amsterdam: : J.C. Gieben 1999. 115–32.

302
Woolf G. World-systems analysis and the Roman empire. Journal of Roman archaeology 1999;3:44–58.http://berlinarchaeology.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/woolf-1990.pdf

303
Flintsource.Net. http://www.flintsource.net/

304
IAOS World Obsidian Source Catalog. http://www.obsidianlab.com/sourcecatalog/s_home.html

305
FREUND KP. AN ASSESSMENT OF THE CURRENT APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF OBSIDIAN SOURCING STUDIES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH. Archaeometry 2013;55:779–93. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00708.x

306
Gratuze B. Obsidian Characterization by Laser Ablation ICP-MS and its Application to Prehistoric Trade in the Mediterranean and the Near East: Sources and Distribution of Obsidian within the Aegean and Anatolia. Journal of Archaeological Science 1999;26:869–81. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0459

307
Herz N. Sourcing lithic artefacts by instrumental analysis. In: Earth sciences and archaeology. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2001. 449–72.

308
Huckell BB, Kilby JD, Boulanger MT, et al. Sentinel Butte: neutron activation analysis of White River Group chert from a primary source and artifacts from a Clovis cache in North Dakota, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science 2011;38:965–76. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.11.011

309
Pollard, A. M., Heron, Carl, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2008.

310
Maniatis Y. Scientific techniques and methodologies for the provenance of white marble. In: Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004. 179–202.

311
Renfrew C, Dixon JE, Cann JR. Obsidian and early cultural contact in the Near East. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1966;32:30–72. doi:10.1017/S0079497X0001433X

312
Michael E. Smith, Adrian L. Burke, Timothy S. Hare and Michael D. Glascock. Sources of Imported Obsidian at Postclassic Sites in the Yautepec Valley, Morelos: A Characterization Study Using XRF and INAA. Latin American Antiquity 2007;18:429–50.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25478196

313
Thorpe RS. The geological sources and transport of the bluestones of Stonehenge, Wiltshire, U.K. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1991;:103–57.

314
Blomster JP. Olmec Pottery Production and Export in Ancient Mexico Determined Through Elemental Analysis. Science 2005;307:1068–72. doi:10.1126/science.1107599

315
Day PM, Kiriatzi E, Tsolakidou A, et al. Group Therapy in Crete: A Comparison Between Analyses by NAA and Thin Section Petrography of Early Minoan Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Science 1999;26:1025–36. doi:10.1006/jasc.1999.0424

316
Freestone I. Ceramic Petrography. American journal of archaeology 1995;99:111–5.

317
Patrick E. McGovern, Thomas L. Sever, J. Wilson Myers, Eleanor Emlen Myers, Bruce Bevan, Naomi F. Miller, S. Bottema, Hitomi Hongo, Richard H. Meadow, Peter Ian Kuniholm, S. G. E. Bowman, M. N. Leese, R. E. M. Hedges, Frederick R. Matson, Ian C. Freestone, Sarah J. Vaughan, Julian Henderson, Pamela B. Vandiver, Charles S. Tumosa, Curt W. Beck, Patricia Smith, A. M. Child, A. M. Pollard, Ingolf Thuesen and Catherine Sease. Science in Archaeology: A Review. American Journal of Archaeology 1995;99:79–142.http://www.jstor.org/stable/506880

318
Morris EL, Woodward A. Ceramic petrology and prehistoric pottery in the UK. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 2003;69:279–304. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00001353

319
Peacock DPS. Neolithic pottery production in Cornwall. Antiquity 1969;43:145–9.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1293745764?accountid=14511

320
Gale NH. A response to the paper of A. M. Pollard. In: From mine to microscope: advances in the study of ancient technology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009. 191–6.http://www.UCL.eblib.com/patron/Read.aspx?p=1696495&pg=1

321
Gale NH, Stos-Gale Z. Lead isotope analyses applied to provenance studies. In: Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000. 503–84.

322
GUERRA MF, CALLIGARO T, PEREA A. THE TREASURE OF GUARRAZAR: TRACING THE GOLD SUPPLIES IN THE VISIGOTHIC IBERIAN PENINSULA. Archaeometry 2007;49:53–74. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2007.00287.x

323
Krause, Rüdiger. Studien zur kupfer- und frühbronzezeitlichen Metallurgie zwischen Karpatenbecken und Ostsee. Rahden/Westf: : Leidorf 2003.

324
Pernicka E. Archaeometallurgy: examples of the application of scientific methods to the provenance of archaeological metal objects. In: Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004. 309–29.

325
Pollard AM. Chapter 17: What a long, strange Trip it’s been: lead Isotopes and Archaeology. In: From mine to microscope: advances in the study of ancient technology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009. 181–9.http://www.ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1696495

326
Stos-Gale Z. Chapter 16: Across the wine dark seas…. sailor tinkers and royal cargoes in the late Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean. In: From mine to microscope: advances in the study of ancient technology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009. 163–80.http://www.ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1696495

327
Calligaro T, Dran J-C, Poirot J-P, et al. PIXE/PIGE characterisation of emeralds using an external micro-beam. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 2000;161–163:769–74. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(99)00974-X

328
Calligaro T, Colinart S, Poirot J-P, et al. Combined external-beam PIXE and μ-Raman characterisation of garnets used in Merovingian jewellery. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 2002;189:320–7. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(01)01078-3

329
Gratuze B, Janssens K. Provenance analysis of glass artefacts. In: Non-destructive microanalysis of cultural heritage materials. Amsterdam, London: : Elsevier 2004. 663–712.

330
Popelka-Filcoff RS, Miksa EJ, Robertson JD, et al. Elemental analysis and characterization of ochre sources from Southern Arizona. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:752–62. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.05.018

331
Robertshaw P, Wood M, Melchiorre E, et al. Southern African glass beads: chemistry, glass sources and patterns of trade. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010;37:1898–912. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.016

332
Stein GJ, Hollander D, Schwartz M. Reconstructing Mesopotamian Exchange Networks in the 4th Millennium BC : Geochemical and Archaeological Analyses of Bitumen Artifacts from Hacinebi Tepe, Turkey. Paléorient 1999;25:67–82. doi:10.3406/paleo.1999.989

333
Weigand PC. Turquoise sources and source analysis: Mesoamerica and the southwestern USA. In: Exchange systems in prehistory. New York: : Academic Press 1977. 15–34.

334
Beck ME. Midden Ceramic Assemblage Formation: A Case Study from Kalinga, Philippines. American Antiquity 2006;71:27–51.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035320

335
Hardy-Smith T, Edwards PC. The Garbage Crisis in prehistory: artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2004;23:253–89. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2004.05.001

336
Schiffer MB. Chapter 1: The nature of archaeological evidence: Chapter 2: The dimensions of artifact variability. In: Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987. 3–23.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_69460.pdf

337
Lewis R. Binford. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research 1981;37:195–208.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3629723?&Search=yes&searchText=archaeology&searchText=Behavioral&list=hide&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DBehavioral%252Barchaeology%252Band%252Bthe%2526Search%253DSearch%2526wc%253Don%2526fc%253Doff%2526globalSearch%253D%2526sbbBox%253D%2526sbjBox%253D%2526sbpBox%253D&prevSearch=&item=17&ttl=9941&returnArticleService=showFullText

338
Richard Bradley. The Destruction of Wealth in Later Prehistory. Man 1982;17:108–22.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2802104

339
Chapman, John. Fragmentation in archaeology: people, places, and broken objects in the prehistory of south-eastern Europe. London: : Routledge 2000.

340
Chapman, John, Gaydarska, Bisserka. Parts and wholes: fragmentation in prehistoric context. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2007.

341
Deal M. Household pottery disposal in the Maya highlands: An ethnoarchaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1985;:243–91. doi:0278-4165(85)90008-X

342
Deal M, Hagstrum MB. Ceramic reuse behavior among the Maya and Wanka: implications for archaeology. In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 111–25.

343
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;:117–63. doi:0278-4165(83)90010-7

344
Hill, J. D. Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: : Tempus Reparatum 1995.

345
Hutson SR, Stanton TW. Cultural Logic and Practical Reason: the Structure of Discard in Ancient Maya Houselots. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 2007;17. doi:10.1017/S0959774307000212

346
Charles H. LeeDecker. Discard Behavior on Domestic Historic Sites: Evaluation of Contexts for the Interpretation of Household Consumption Patterns. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1994;1:345–75.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177317

347
Martin L, Russell N. Trashing rubbish. In: Towards reflexive method in archaeology: the example at Çatalhöyük : by members of the Çatalhöyük team. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2000. 57–69.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=74d1321e-9136-e711-80c9-005056af4099

348
Moore, Henrietta L. Space, text, and gender: an anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya. New York: : Guilford Press 1996.

349
Needham, Stuart, Spence, Tony, Serjeantson, D., et al. Refuse and disposal at Area 16 East, Runnymede. London: : Trustees of the British Museum 1996.

350
Patrik L. Is there an archaeological record? Advances in archaeological method and theory 1985;8:27–62.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170186

351
Pounds, Norman John Greville. Hearth & home: a history of material culture. Bloomington, [Ind.]: : Indiana University Press 1989.

352
Michael B. Schiffer. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity 1972;37:156–65.http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203

353
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987.

354
Schofield, A. J., Theoretical Archaeology Group (England). Interpreting artefact scatters: contributions to ploughzone archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 1991.

355
Michael J. Shott. Status and Role of Formation Theory in Contemporary Archaeological Practice. Journal of Archaeological Research 1998;6:299–329.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053161

356
Sommer U. Dirt theory, or archaeological sites seen as rubbish heaps. Journal of theoretical archaeology 1990;1:47–60.

357
Sommer U. Wer hat Dornröschen aufgeweckt? Taphonomie und Mainstream-Archäologie. In: Taphonomische Forschungen (nicht nur) zum Neolithikum. Loogh: : Welt und Erde 2012. 15–34.

358
Staski, Edward, Sutro, Livingston D. The ethnoarchaeology of refuse disposal. [Tempe, Ariz.]: : Arizona State University 1991.

359
Thompson, M. Rubbish theory: the creation and destruction of value. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1979.

360
Walker W. Ceremonial trash? In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 67–79.http://www.academia.edu/2519493/Ceremonial_Trash

361
Wilson DC. Identification and assessment of secondary refuse aggregates. Journal of archaeological method and theory 1994;1:41–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177304

362
Benito-Calvo A, de la Torre I. Analysis of orientation patterns in Olduvai Bed I assemblages using GIS techniques: Implications for site formation processes. Journal of Human Evolution 2011;61:50–60. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2011.02.011

363
Bevan A. Spatial methods for analysing large-scale artefact inventories. Antiquity 2012;86:492–506.http://search.proquest.com/docview/1021249050?accountid=14511

364
Martinón-Torres M, Li XJ, Bevan A, et al. Making Weapons for the Terracotta Army. Archaeology International 2011;13. doi:10.5334/ai.1316

365
Tilley C, Hamilton S, Harrison S, et al. Nature, Culture, Clitter: Distinguishing Between Cultural and Geomorphological Landscapes; The Case of Hilltop Tors in South-West England. Journal of Material Culture 2000;5:197–224. doi:10.1177/135918350000500204

366
Bevan A. Mediterranean islands, fragile communities and persistent landscapes: Antikythera in long-term perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.

367
Blankholm, H. P. Intrasite spatial analysis in theory and practice. Aarhus: : Aarhus University Press 1991.

368
BRUGHMANS T. CONNECTING THE DOTS: TOWARDS ARCHAEOLOGICAL NETWORK ANALYSIS. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2010;29:277–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2010.00349.x

369
Hietala, Harold J. Intrasite spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1984.

370
Hodder, Ian, Orton, Clive. Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1976.

371
Katsianis M, Tsipidis S, Kotsakis K, et al. A 3D digital workflow for archaeological intra-site research using GIS. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:655–67. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.002

372
Kroll, Ellen M., Price, T. Douglas, Society for American Archaeology. The interpretation of archaeological spatial patterning. New York: : Plenum Press 1991.

373
Livingood PC, Cordell AS. Point/counter point: the accuracy and feasibility of digital image techniques in the analysis of ceramic thin sections. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:867–72. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.11.015

374
Vanzetti et al. A. The iceman as a burial. Antiquity 2010;84:681–92.http://search.proquest.com/docview/755013317?accountid=14511

375
STRAND B - RESEARCH DESIGN AND MATERIALS ANALYSIS.

376
Archaeometry - Volume 49, Issue 2 - May 2007 - Wiley Online Library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/arch.2007.49.issue-2/issuetoc;jsessionid=C29BB0DA1059927413EA82D1C17CC253.d03t04

377
Archaeometry - Volume 50, Issue 6 - December 2008 - Wiley Online Library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/arch.2008.50.issue-6/issuetoc

378
Archaeometry - Volume 50, Issue 6 - December 2008 - Wiley Online Library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/arch.2008.50.issue-6/issuetoc

379
Artioli G, Angelini I. Scientific methods and cultural heritage: an introduction to the application of materials science to archaeometry and conservation science. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.

380
Bowman S, British Museum. Department of Scientific Research. Science and the past. Toronto, Ont: : University of Toronto Press 1991. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt2tv44s

381
Brothwell DR, Pollard AM. Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001.

382
Demortier G, Adriaens A, European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research (Organization), et al. Ion beam study of art and archaeological objects. Luxembourg: : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000.

383
Dran J-C, Salomon J, Calligaro T, et al. Ion beam analysis of art works: 14 years of use in the Louvre. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 2004;219–220:7–15. doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2004.01.019

384
Ciliberto E, Spoto G. Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000.

385
Edwards HGM, Chalmers JM, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Raman spectroscopy in archaeology and art history. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2005.

386
Edwards, Howell G. M., Lewis, Ian R. Handbook of Raman spectroscopy: from the research laboratory to the process line. New York: : Marcel Dekker 2001.

387
Giumlia-Mair A. Surface characterisation techniques in the study and conservation of art and archaeological artefacts: a review. Materials technology 2010;25:345–261.http://www.academia.edu/3427109/Surface_characterisation_techniques_in_the_study_and_conservation_of_art_and_archaeological_artefacts_a_review_Giumlia-Mair_Albertson_Boschian_Giachi_Lacomussi_Pallecchi_Rossi_Shugar_and_Stock_

388
Goffer Z. Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: : Wiley 2007.

389
Henderson J. Scientific analysis in archaeology and its interpretation. Oxford: : Oxford University Committee for Archaeology, Institute of Archaeology 1989.

390
Henderson J. The science and archaeology of materials: an investigation of inorganic materials. London: : Routledge 2000.

391
Janssens KHA, Grieken R van. Non-destructive microanalysis of cultural heritage materials. Amsterdam, London: : Elsevier 2004.

392
Lambert JB. Traces of the past: unraveling the secrets of archaeology through chemistry. Cambridge, Mass: : Perseus 1997.

393
Martini M, Milazzo M, Piacentini M, et al. Physics methods in archaeometry. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2004.

394
Martinón-Torres M, Rehren T. Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008.

395
Moreau J-F. Proceedings: ISA 2006 : 36th International Symposium on Archaeometry : 2-6 May 2006, Quebec City, Canada. Québec: : CELAT, Université Laval 2009.

396
Arthur M. Sackler Colloquia of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Sciences (U.S.). Scientific examination of art: modern techniques in conservation and analysis : National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., March 19-21, 2003. Washington, D.C.: : National Academies Press 2005.

397
Nesse WD. Introduction to optical mineralogy. 3rd ed. New York: : Oxford University Press 2004.

398
Olsen SL. Scanning electron microscopy in archaeology. Oxford: : B.A.R. 1988.

399
Parkes PA. Current scientific techniques in archaeology. London: : Croom Helm 1986.

400
Pérez-Arantegui J, editor. Proceedings of the 34th International Symposium on Archaeometry. 2006.http://ifc.dpz.es/publicaciones/ebooks/id/2610

401
Pollard AM, Heron C, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2008.

402
Pollard AM, Batt C, Young S, et al. Analytical chemistry in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.

403
Shackley, M. Steven. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. New York: : Springer 2011.

404
Torrence R, Rehren T, Martinon-Torres M. Scoping the Future of Archaeological Science: Papers in Honour of Richard Klein. Journal of Archaeological Science 2015;56.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03054403/56

405
Arthur M. Sackler Colloquia of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Sciences (U.S.). Scientific examination of art: modern techniques in conservation and analysis : National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., March 19-21, 2003. Washington, D.C.: : National Academies Press 2005.

406
Shackley M. An introduction to X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis in archaeology. In: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. New York: : Springer 2011. 7–44. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_2

407
Uda M, Demortier G, Nakai I, et al. X-rays for archaeology. Dordrecht: : Springer 2005.

408
Adriaens A. Non-destructive analysis and testing of museum objects: An overview of 5 years of research. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy 2005;60:1503–16. doi:10.1016/j.sab.2005.10.006

409
De Atley SP, Bishop RL. Toward an integrated interface for archaeology and archaeometry. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991. 358–81.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bf3b4d17-7436-e711-80c9-005056af4099

410
Hamilton E. The four scales of technical analysis; or ’how to make archaeometry more useful. In: Exploring the role of analytical scale in archaeological interpretation. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2004. 45–8.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45097.pdf

411
Killick D. Archaeology and archaeometry: From casual dating to a meaningful relationship? Antiquity 1997;71:518–24.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217552149?accountid=14511

412
Killick D. The awkward adolescence of archaeological science. Journal of Archaeological Science 2015;56:242–7. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.010

413
Jones A. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.

414
Jones A. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice*. Archaeometry 2004;46:327–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00161.x

415
Martinón-Torres M. Why should archaeologists take history and science seriously? In: Archaeology, history and science: integrating approaches to ancient materials. Walnut Creek, CA: : Left Coast Press 2008. 15–36.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45457.pdf

416
Martinón-Torres M, Killic DC. Archaeological Theories and Archaeological Sciences. In: Gardner A, Lake M, Sommer U, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Theory. 2015. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199567942.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199567942-e-004?rskey=F3hTAd&result=1

417
Rehren T. Qantir-Piramesses and the organisation of the Egyptian glass industry. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001. 223–138.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45094.pdf

418
Sillar B, Tite MS. The challenge of ‘Technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x

419
Tite MS. Overview - materials study in archaeology. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001. 443–8.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a5c876a6-5736-e711-80c9-005056af4099

420
Hancock RGV. Elemental analysis. In: Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000. 11–20.

421
Shackley M. An introduction to X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analysis in archaeology. In: X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology. New York: : Springer 2011. 7–44. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_2

422
Shackley MS. An introduction to X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis in archaeology. In: Shackley MS, ed. X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology. New York ; London : Springer 2011. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_2

423
Contrey RM, Goodman-Elgar M, Bettencourt N, et al. Calibration of a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer in the analysis of archaeological samples using influence coefficients. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 2014;14.http://geea.lyellcollection.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/14/3/291.full.pdf

424
Frahm E, Doonan RCP. The technological versus methodological revolution of portable XRF in archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 2013;40:1425–34. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.013

425
Shackley M. Is there reliability and validity in portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF)? SAA archaeological record 2010;:17–20.

426
Shackley MS. Portable X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (pXRF): The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Archaeology Southwest Magazine 2012;26.http://www.archaeologysouthwest.org/pdf/pXRF_essay_shackley.pdf

427
Shugar AN, Mass JL. Handheld XRF for art and archaeology. Leuven: : Leuven University Press 2012.

428
Shugar AN. Portable X-ray Fluorescence and Archaeology: Limitations of the Instrument and Suggested Methods To Achieve Desired Results. In: Armitage RA, Burton JH, eds. Archaeological chemistry VIII. Washington, DC: : American Chemical Society 2013. 173–89.

429
Charalambous A, Kassianidou V, Papasavvas G. A compositional study of Cypriot bronzes dating to the Early Iron Age using portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (pXRF). Journal of Archaeological Science 2014;46:205–16. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.006

430
Dussubieux L, Walder H. Identifying American native and European smelted coppers with pXRF: a case study of artifacts from the Upper Great Lakes region. Journal of Archaeological Science 2015;59:169–78. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2015.04.011

431
Kearns T, Martinón-Torres M, Rehren T. Metal to mould: alloy identification in experimental casting moulds using XRF. Historical metallurgy: journal of the Historical Metallurgy Society 2010;44:48–58.

432
Martinón-Torres M, Li XJ, Bevan A, et al. Forty Thousand Arms for a Single Emperor: From Chemical Data to the Labor Organization Behind the Bronze Arrows of the Terracotta Army. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2014;21:534–62. doi:10.1007/s10816-012-9158-z

433
Martinón-Torres M, ValcÃ¡rcel Rojas R, SÃ¡enz Samper J, et al. Metallic encounters in Cuba: The technology, exchange and meaning of metals before and after Columbus. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2012;31:439–54. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2012.03.006

434
Martinón-Torres M, Uribe-Villegas MA. The prehistoric individual, connoisseurship, and archaeological science: the Muisca goldwork of Colombia. Journal of Archaeological Sciencehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03054403/open-access

435
Nicholas M, Manti P. Testing the applicability of handheld portable XRF to the characterisation of archaeological copper alloys. In: Bridgland J, ed. ICOM-CC 17th Triennial Conference Preprints, Melbourne. Paris: International Council of Museums 15AD. http://orca.cf.ac.uk/65469/

436
Orfanou V, Rehren Th. A (not so) dangerous method: pXRF vs. EPMA-WDS analyses of copper-based artefacts. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 2015;7:387–97. doi:10.1007/s12520-014-0198-z

437
Forster N, Grave P, Vickery N, et al. Non-destructive analysis using PXRF: methodology and application to archaeological ceramics. X-Ray Spectrometry 2011;40:389–98. doi:10.1002/xrs.1360

438
Goren Y, Mommsen H, Klinger J. Non-destructive provenance study of cuneiform tablets using portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF). Journal of Archaeological Science 2011;38:684–96. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.020

439
Hunt AMW, Speakman RJ. Portable XRF analysis of archaeological sediments and ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 2015;53:626–38. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.11.031

440
Speakman RJ, Little NC, Creel D, et al. Sourcing ceramics with portable XRF spectrometers? A comparison with INAA using Mimbres pottery from the American Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Science 2011;38:3483–96. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.08.011

441
Dungworth D, Girbal B. Waler Castle, Deal, Kent: Analysis of Window Glass. English Heritage Research Department Report Series 2011;2011.http://research.historicengland.org.uk/redirect.aspx?id=5944

442
Liu S, Li QH, Gan F, et al. Silk Road glass in Xinjiang, China: chemical compositional analysis and interpretation using a high-resolution portable XRF spectrometer. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012;39:2128–42. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.02.035

443
Nazaroff AJ, Prufer KM, Drake BL. Assessing the applicability of portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry for obsidian provenance research in the Maya lowlands. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010;37:885–95. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.11.019

444
Frahm E. Validity of âoff-the-shelfâ handheld portable XRF for sourcing Near Eastern obsidian chip debris. Journal of Archaeological Science 2013;40:1080–92. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.038

445
Speakman RJ, Steven Shackley M. Silo science and portable XRF in archaeology: a response to Frahm. Journal of Archaeological Science 2013;40:1435–43. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.033

446
Frahm E. Is obsidian sourcing about geochemistry or archaeology? A reply to Speakman and Shackley. Journal of Archaeological Science 2013;40:1444–8. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.001

447
Milić M. PXRF characterisation of obsidian from central Anatolia, the Aegean and central Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 2014;41:285–96. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.002

448
Grave P, Attenbrow V, Sutherland L, et al. Non-destructive pXRF of mafic stone tools. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012;39:1674–86. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2011.11.011

449
Ogburn D, Sillar B, Sierra JC. Evaluating effects of chemical weathering and surface contamination on the in situ provenance analysis of building stones in the Cuzco region of Peru with portable XRF. Journal of Archaeological Science 2013;40:1823–37. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.023

450
Colombo C, Bracci S, Conti C, et al. Non-invasive approach in the study of polychrome terracotta sculptures: employment of the portable XRF to investigate complex stratigraphy. X-Ray Spectrometry 2011;40:273–9. doi:10.1002/xrs.1336

451
Chaplin TD, Clark RJH, MartinÃ³n-Torres M. A combined Raman microscopy, XRF and SEMâEDX study of three valuable objects â A large painted leather screen and two illuminated title pages in 17th century books of ordinances of the Worshipful Company of Barbers, London. Journal of Molecular Structure 2010;976:350–9. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2010.03.042

452
Eliyahu-Behar A, Shilstein S, Raban-Gerstel N, et al. An integrated approach to reconstructing primary activities from pit deposits: iron smithing and other activities at Tel Dor under Neo-Assyrian domination. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:2895–908. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.004

453
Gauss RK, BÃ¡tora J, Nowaczinski E, et al. The Early Bronze Age settlement of FidvÃ¡r, VrÃ¡ble (Slovakia): reconstructing prehistoric settlement patterns using portable XRF. Journal of Archaeological Science 2013;40:2942–60. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.01.029

454
Abe Y, Nakai I, Takahashi K, et al. On-site analysis of archaeological artifacts excavated from the site on the outcrop at Northwest Saqqara, Egypt, by using a newly developed portable fluorescence spectrometer and diffractometer. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 2009;395:1987–96. doi:10.1007/s00216-009-3141-x

455
Cotte M, Dumas P, Taniguchi Y, et al. Recent applications and current trends in Cultural Heritage Science using synchrotron-based Fourier transform infrared micro-spectroscopy. Comptes Rendus Physique 2009;10:590–600. doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2009.03.016

456
De Benedetto GE, Laviano R, Sabbatini L, et al. Infrared spectroscopy in the mineralogical characterization of ancient pottery. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2002;3:177–86. doi:10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01178-0

457
Eiland ML, Williams Q. Investigation of Islamic ceramics from Tell Tuneinir using X-ray diffraction. Geoarchaeology 2001;16:875–903. doi:10.1002/gea.1025

458
Freestone IC, Middleton AP. . Mineralogical applications of the analytical SEM in archaeology. Mineralogical Magazine 1987;51:21–31.http://www.minersoc.org/pages/Archive-MM/Volume_51/51-359-21.pdf

459
Ingo GM, Balbi S, de Caro T, et al. Combined use of SEM-EDS, OM and XRD for the characterization of corrosion products grown on silver roman coins. Applied Physics A 2006;83:493–7. doi:10.1007/s00339-006-3533-0

460
Martinón-Torres M, Uribe-Villegas MA. The prehistoric individual, connoisseurship, and archaeological science: the Muisca goldwork of Colombia. Journal of Archaeological Sciencehttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03054403/open-access

461
Ricciardi P, Colomban P, Tournié A, et al. A non-invasive study of Roman Age mosaic glass tesserae by means of Raman spectroscopy. Journal of Archaeological Science 2009;36:2551–9. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2009.07.008

462
Sax M, Walsh JM, Freestone IC, et al. The origins of two purportedly pre-Columbian Mexican crystal skulls. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:2751–60. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.05.007

463
Conservation institute TG. Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science - infrared spectroscopy. 1999. http://www.getty.edu/conservation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/infrared_spectroscopy.pdf

464
Young ML, Casadio F, Schnepp S, et al. Non-invasive characterization of manufacturing techniques and corrosion of ancient Chinese bronzes and a later replica using synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Applied Physics A 2010;100:635–46. doi:10.1007/s00339-010-5646-8

465
Orton C. Sampling in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.

466
Tite MS. Archaeological collections: invasive sampling versus object integrity. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology: PIA 2002;13:1–6.http://pia-journal.co.uk/articles/abstract/10.5334/pia.189/

467
Tubb KW. Irreconcilable Differences? Problems with Unprovenanced Antiquities. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 2007;18. doi:10.5334/pia.294

468
Hein A, Tsolakidou A, Iliopoulos I, et al. Standardisation of elemental analytical techniques applied to provenance studies of archaeological ceramics: an inter laboratory calibration study. The Analyst 2002;127:542–53. doi:10.1039/b109603f

469
Heginbotham A, Bezur A, Bouchard M, et al. An Evaluation of inter-laboratory reproducibility for quantitative XRF of historic copper Alloys. In: Mardikian P, Chemello C, Watters C, et al., eds. In Metal 2010. Proceedings of the International Conference on Metal Conservation, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, October 11-15, 2010. Clemson University 2010. 178–88.http://www.getty.edu/museum/pdfs/heginbotham_metal2010_submitted2.pdf

470
Kovacs R, Schlosser S, Staub SP, et al. Characterization of calibration materials for trace element analysis and fingerprint studies of gold using LA-ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 2009;24. doi:10.1039/b819685k

471
Baxter MJ. Exploratory multivariate analysis in archaeology. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1994.

472
Baxter MJ. Statistics in archaeology. London: : Arnold 2003.

473
Baxter MJ, Buck CE. Data handling and statistical analysis. In: Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology. New York: : Wiley 2000. 681–746.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45286.pdf

474
BAXTER MJ, FREESTONE IC. LOG-RATIO COMPOSITIONAL DATA ANALYSIS IN ARCHAEOMETRY*. Archaeometry 2006;48:511–31. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00270.x

475
Charlton MF, Blakelock E, Martinon-Torres M. Investigating the production provenance of iron artifacts with multivariate methods. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012;39:2280–93.http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1375923/1/1375923.pdf

476
Drennan RD. Statistics for archaeologists: a commonsense approach. 2nd ed. New York: : Springer 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0413-3

477
Fletcher M, Lock GR. Digging numbers: elementary statistics for archaeologists. Oxford: : Oxford University Committee for Archaeology 1991.

478
Orton, Clive. Mathematics in archaeology. London: : Collins 1980.

479
Shennan S. Quantifying archaeology. 2nd ed. Iowa City: : University of Iowa Press 1997.

480
Thornton CP, Lamberg-Karlovsky CC, Liezers M, et al. On Pins and Needles: Tracing the Evolution of Copper-base Alloying at Tepe Yahya, Iran, via ICP-MS Analysis of Common-place Items. Journal of Archaeological Science 2002;29:1451–60. doi:10.1006/jasc.2002.0809

481
Ponting MJ. Keeping up with the Romans? Romanisation and copper alloys in First Revolt Palestine. Institute for Archaeo-Metallurgical Studies newsletter 2002;22:3–6.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c1071af0-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099

482
Chippindale C. Colleagues, talking, writing, publishing. In: Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: : Altamira Press 2006. 1339–71.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45101.pdf

483
Sand-Jensen K. How to write consistently boring scientific literature. Oikos 2007;116:723–7. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15674.x

484
White P. Producing the record. In: Archaeology in practice: a student guide to archaeological analyses. Malden, MA: : Blackwell 2006. 410–25.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ARCLG107_45099.pdf

Bibliography for ARCLG107: Technology and Analysis of Archaeological Material: Marcos Martinon-Torres BETA