Bibliography for PUBLG063: International Human Rights Standards and Institutions

1.
Class Times.

2.
Course Overview.

3.
Course Aims and Objectives.

4.
Learning Outcomes.

5.
Teaching and Learning Strategy.

6.
Seminar Work.

7.
Assessment Method.

8.
Essay Submission.

9.
Plagiarism.

10.
Avant DD, Finnemore M, Sell SK. Who governs the globe? [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511724626

11.
Barnett MN, Duvall R. Power in global governance. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

12.
Boyle K. New institutions for human rights protection. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

13.
Cardenas S. Conflict and compliance: state responses to international human rights pressure. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2007.

14.
Clapham A. Human rights: a very short introduction. Vol. Very short introductions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

15.
Donnelly J. International human rights. Fourth edition. Vol. Dilemmas in world politics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 2013.

16.
Schutter O de. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

17.
Freeman M. Human rights: an interdisciplinary approach. 2nd ed. Vol. Key concepts series. Cambridge: Polity; 2011.

18.
Goodale M, Merry SE. The practice of human rights: tracking law between the global and the local. Vol. Cambridge studies in law and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

19.
Hafner-Burton E. Making human rights a reality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2013.

20.
Hopgood S. The endtimes of human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2013.

21.
Ishay M. The history of human rights: from ancient times to the globalization era. New ed. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2008.

22.
Mertus J. The United Nations and human rights: a guide for a new era [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. Routledge global institutions. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203878019

23.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203878019

24.
Nowak M. Introduction to the international human rights regime. Vol. The Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library. Leiden: M. Nijhoff; 2003.

25.
Oberleitner G. Global human rights institutions: between remedy and ritual. Cambridge: Polity; 2007.

26.
Posner EA. The twilight of human rights law. Vol. Inalienable rights series. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

27.
Reus-Smit C, Snidal D. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Vol. The Oxford handbooks of political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

28.
Risse-Kappen T, Ropp SC, Sikkink K. The persistent power of human rights: from commitment to compliance. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.

29.
Sikkink K. The justice cascade: how human rights prosecutions are changing world politics. New York: W.W. Norton; 2011.

30.
Simmons BA. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

31.
Smith RKM. Textbook on international human rights. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

32.
Tomuschat C. Human rights: between idealism and realism. Third edition. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

33.
Welcome to the United Nations: It’s Your World [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/

34.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/pages/home.aspx

35.
Promoting and strengthening the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.upr-info.org/en

36.
United Nations Human Rights Treaties [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/InternationalLaw.aspx

37.
United Nations Human Rights Bodies: [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/HumanRightsBodies.aspx

38.
Universal Human Rights Index of United Nations Documents: [Internet]. Available from: http://uhri.ohchr.org/

39.
UN International Law site: Available from: https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/international-law-and-justice/index.html

40.
HURIDOCS [Internet]. Available from: https://www.huridocs.org/?set_language=en

41.
American Society of International Law (ASIL) Guide to Electronic Sources for International Law [Internet]. Available from: https://www.asil.org/resources/electronic-resource-guide-erg

42.
Human Rights Library- University of Minnesota [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/

43.
International Human Rights Lexicon [Internet]. Available from: http://www.internationalhumanrightslexicon.org/

44.
Avalon Project - Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy [Internet]. Available from: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/default.asp

45.
International Law Commission. Available from: https://legal.un.org/ilc/

46.
Cour internationale de Justice | International Court of Justice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/

47.
ICC - International Criminal Court [Internet]. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/

48.
International Tribunal for Former Yugoslavia: [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icty.org/

49.
United Nations International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unictr.org/

50.
National Human Rights Institutions Forum [Internet]. Available from: http://www.nhri.net/

51.
African Union [Internet]. Available from: http://www.au.int/

52.
African Charter site: African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.achpr.org/

53.
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.achpr.org/

54.
African Court of Justice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.african-court.org/en/

55.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/index.php/en

56.
Inter-American Commission for Human Rights. Available from: https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/

57.
Asia Human Rights Mechanism group [Internet]. Available from: http://www.aseanhrmech.org/

58.
Council of Europe [Internet]. Available from: http://www.coe.int/en/web/portal/home

59.
European Court of Human Rights: [Internet]. Available from: http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home

60.
European Court of Human Rights Database [Internet]. Available from: http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=caselaw/analysis&c=

61.
The European Union [Internet]. Available from: http://europa.eu/pol/rights/index_en.htm

62.
The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe | OSCE [Internet]. Available from: http://www.osce.org/

63.
Human Rights Watch [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hrw.org/

64.
Amnesty International [Internet]. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/

65.
International Committee of the Red Cross [Internet]. Available from: https://www.icrc.org/

66.
The Coalition for An International Criminal Court [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iccnow.org/

67.
International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ihf-hr.org/

68.
Theory Talks [Internet]. Available from: http://www.theory-talks.org/

69.
Conversations with History | University of California, Berkeley [Internet]. Available from: http://conversations.berkeley.edu/

70.
Foreign Policy | the Global Magazine of News and Ideas [Internet]. Available from: http://foreignpolicy.com/

71.
Daniel Drezner ‘Global Politics, Economics and Pop Culture’: [Internet]. Available from: http://foreignpolicy.com/author/daniel-w-drezner/

72.
Richard Falk ‘Citizen Pilgrimage’ [Internet]. Available from: https://richardfalk.wordpress.com/

73.
Simon Davies ‘The Privacy Surgeon’ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/

74.
EconTalk with Russ Roberts: [Internet]. Available from: http://www.econtalk.org/

75.
Global Governance | Brookings Institution [Internet]. Available from: http://www.brookings.edu/research/topics/global-governance

76.
Global Governance | The National Interest [Internet]. Available from: http://nationalinterest.org/topic/global-governance

77.
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria [Internet]. Available from: http://www.theglobalfund.org/en/

78.
Global Health Policy Blog | Center For Global Development [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cgdev.org/global-health-policy-blog

79.
Open Global Rights | Open Democracy [Internet]. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/openglobalrights

80.
Global Policy Forum: [Internet]. Available from: https://www.globalpolicy.org/

81.
Global Compact [Internet]. Available from: https://www.unglobalcompact.org/

82.
World Bank Governance and Anti-Corruption: [Internet]. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/webarchives/archive?url=httpzzxxweb.worldbank.org/archive/website00818/WEB/INDEX-6.HTM

83.
Universal Human Rights Index [Internet]. Available from: http://uhri.ohchr.org/

84.
Bertelsmann Transformation Index: [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bti-project.de/bti-home/

85.
Human Development Index (HDI) [Internet]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi

86.
Corruption Perceptions Index [Internet]. Available from: http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overview

87.
Recall the Ten Weeks of PUBLG052.

88.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights [Internet]. 1966. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx

89.
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Banjul Charter / ACHPR [Internet]. 1981. Available from: https://www.achpr.org/legalinstruments/detail?id=49

90.
Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ‘Protocol of San Salvador’ [Internet]. 1988. Available from: http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-52.html

91.
A/RES/41/128. Declaration on the Right to Development [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RightToDevelopment.aspx

92.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

93.
United Nations, Millennium Development Goals. Available from: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

94.
United Nations Millennium Development Goals. Available from: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/global.shtml

95.
Schutter et al. OD. Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2012;34(4):1084–169. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v034/34.4.de-schutter.html

96.
Global Justice Program [Internet]. Available from: https://globaljustice.yale.edu/

97.
Global Justice Program [Internet]. Available from: https://globaljustice.yale.edu/

98.
López Ostra v. Spain, ECtHR [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57905#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57905%22]}

99.
Urgenda v. Netherlands [Internet]. Available from: http://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196

100.
Massachusetts v. EPA [Internet]. Available from: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/06pdf/05-1120.pdf

101.
Social and Economic Rights Action Center/Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria [Internet]. Available from: https://www.escr-net.org/caselaw/2006/social-and-economic-rights-action-center-center-economic-and-social-rights-v-nigeria

102.
Human Rights Documents [Internet]. Available from: http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/alldocs.aspx?doc_id=14880

103.
Twelfth session of the intergovernmental Working Group on the Right to Development [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Development/Pages/12thSession.aspx

104.
Shue H. Human rights, climate change, and the trillionth ton. In: Arnold DG, editor. The Ethics of Global Climate Change [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. p. 292–314. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511732294A022

105.
Accountability for the Post-2015 Agenda | Human Rights Watch [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/03/18/accountability-post-2015-agenda

106.
Alston P. Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2005;27(3):755–829. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069811

107.
Alston P. Conjuring up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control. The American Journal of International Law. 1984;78(3).

108.
Weiss EB. In fairness to future generations: international law, common patrimony, and intergenerational equity. Vol. Innovation in international law. Tokyo: United Nations University; 1989.

109.
Gardiner SM. Climate ethics: essential readings. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

110.
Donnelly J. Human Rights, Democracy, and Development. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1999;21(3):608–32. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/762667

111.
Easterly W. How the Millennium Development Goals are Unfair to Africa. World Development. 2009 Jan;37(1):26–35.

112.
Horton R. Offline: Why the Sustainable Development Goals will fail. The Lancet. 2014 Jun;383(9936).

113.
McGoldrick D. Sustainable Development and Human Rights: An Integrated Conception. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 1996 Oct;45(04).

114.
Nelson PJ. Human Rights, the Millennium Development Goals, and the Future of Development Cooperation. World Development. 2007 Dec;35(12):2041–55.

115.
JD Sachs, JW McArthur. The Millennium Project: a plan for meeting the Millennium Development Goals. The Lancet [Internet]. 2005 Jan;365(9456):347–53. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140673605177915/fulltext

116.
Saith A. From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation. Development and Change. 2006 Nov;37(6):1167–99.

117.
Travis P, Bennett S, Haines A, Pang T, Bhutta Z, Hyder AA, et al. Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. The Lancet. 2004 Sep;364(9437):900–6.

118.
Burns WCG, Osofsky HM. Adjudicating climate change: state, national, and international approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

119.
Humphreys S. Human rights and climate change [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press; 2010. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511765520

120.
Humphreys S. Beyond technology transfer: protecting human rights in a climate-constrained world. 2011; Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/39431/

121.
NAGEL T. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Public Affairs. 2005 Mar;33(2):113–47.

122.
Pogge T. World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2008.

123.
Symposium: International Human Rights and Climate Change [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/gjicl/vol38/iss3/

124.
Vizard P. Poverty and human rights: Sen’s ‘capability perspective’ explored [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273874.001.0001

125.
K, Tomasevski. Development aid and human rights. 1989.

126.
Uvin P. Human rights and development. Bloomfield, Conn: Kumarian Press; 2004.

127.
den Elzen MGJ, Olivier JGJ, Höhne N, Janssens-Maenhout G. Countries’ contributions to climate change: effect of accounting for all greenhouse gases, recent trends, basic needs and technological progress. Climatic Change. 2013 Nov;121(2):397–412.

128.
Watt-Cloutier S. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to Hold Hearing on Global Warming [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://earthjustice.org/news/press/2007/inter-american-commission-on-human-rights-to-hold-hearing-on-global-warming

129.
The Climate Law Database [Internet]. Available from: https://climate-laws.org/

130.
Hampson FJ. An Overview of the Reform of the UN Human Rights Machinery. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):7–27.

131.
Daniel A. Farber. Basic Compensation for Victims of Climate Change. University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Internet]. 2007;155(6):1605–56. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40041375?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

132.
Pentassuglia G. Towards a Jurisprudential Articulation of Indigenous Land Rights. European Journal of International Law. 2011 Feb 1;22(1):165–202.

133.
The Philippines: Supreme Court Decision in Minors Oposa v. Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) (Deforestation; Environmental Damage; Intergenerational Equity). International Legal Materials [Internet]. 1994;33(1):173–206. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20693894

134.
Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage [Internet]. Available from: https://unfccc.int/topics/adaptation-and-resilience/workstreams/loss-and-damage-ld/warsaw-international-mechanism-for-loss-and-damage-associated-with-climate-change-impacts-wim

135.
Protecting Victims of Gendered Persecution: Fear of Floodgates or Call to (Principled) Action? - viewcontent.cgi [Internet]. Available from: http://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1560&context=faculty_scholarship

136.
Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted - LexUriServ.do [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:337:0009:0026:en:PDF

137.
Zimmermann A. The 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees and its 1967 Protocol: a commentary. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.

138.
Keith W. Yundt. The Organization of American States and Legal Protection to Political Refugees in Central America. The International Migration Review [Internet]. 1989;23(2):201–18. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2546258?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

139.
States Parties to the OAU Convention Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa of 10 September 1969. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 2001 Jan 1;20(3):170–1.

140.
Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted - LexUriServ.do [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:337:0009:0026:en:PDF

141.
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights / Legal Instruments / ACHPR [Internet]. Available from: https://www.achpr.org/legalinstruments/detail?id=49

142.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx

143.
Meki Elgafaji, Noor Elgafaji v. Staatssecretaris van Justitie. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2009 Jul 1;21(2):297–307.

144.
UNITED KINGDOM HOUSE OF LORDS: REGINA V. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, EX PARTE ADAN. International Legal Materials [Internet]. 1998;37(5):1090–100. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20698831?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

145.
K v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] UK HL 46, Lord Bingham of Cornhill [Internet]. Available from: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd061018/sshd-1.htm

146.
Penelope Mathew. Islam v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, and Regina v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Shah. [1999] 2 A.C. 629. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2001;95(3):671–8. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2668514?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

147.
Ashworth, Andrew. Suti and Elmi v United Kingdom. Available from: https://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/en/content/ecthr-sufi-and-elmi-v-united-kingdom-application-nos-831907-and-1144907-0

148.
Case of M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2011 Jul 1;23(2):288–403.

149.
UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Expert Meeting on Complementarities between International Refugee Law, International Criminal Law and International Human Rights Law, Summary Conclusions [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4e1729d52.html

150.
UNHCR - Guidelines on International Protection No. 2: ‘Membership of a Particular Social group’ within the context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or its 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (HCR/GIP/02/02) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/3d58de2da.html

151.
Barnett L. Global Governance and the Evolution of the International Refugee Regime. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2002;14(2 and 3):238–62.

152.
Storey H. Armed Conflict in Asylum Law: The ‘War-Flaw’. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 2012 Jun 1;31(2):1–32.

153.
Protecting Victims of Gendered Persecution: Fear of Floodgates or Call to (Principled) Action? - viewcontent.cgi [Internet]. Available from: http://repository.uchastings.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1560&context=faculty_scholarship

154.
How EU Promises to Introduce Refugee Quotas Failed - SPIEGEL ONLINE [Internet]. Available from: http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/how-eu-promises-to-introduce-refugee-quotas-failed-a-1040226.html

155.
UNHCR statement on Australia-Cambodia agreement on refugee relocation [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/542526db9.html

156.
Brun C. Hospitality: Becoming ‘IDPs’ and ‘Hosts’ in Protracted Displacement. Journal of Refugee Studies. 2010 Sep 1;23(3):337–55.

157.
Crawley H. Forced Migration and the Politics of Asylum: The Missing Pieces of the International Migration Puzzle? International Migration. 2006 Mar;44(1):21–6.

158.
Spencer S. The politics of migration: managing opportunity, conflict and change. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2003.

159.
Dubernet C. The international containment of displaced persons: humanitarian spaces without exit. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2001.

160.
Ferris EG. The politics of protection: the limits of humanitarian action [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press; 2011. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780815721383

161.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh E. Invisible Refugees and/or Overlapping Refugeedom? Protecting Sahrawis and Palestinians Displaced by the 2011 Libyan Uprising. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2012 May 1;24(2):263–93.

162.
Gibney MJ. The ethics and politics of asylum: liberal democracy and the response to refugees. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

163.
Gilbert G. Is Europe Living Up to Its Obligations to Refugees? European Journal of International Law. 2004;15(5):963–87.

164.
Goodwin-Gill GS. The Right to Seek Asylum: Interception at Sea and the Principle of Non-Refoulement. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2011 Oct 1;23(3):443–57.

165.
Gottwald M. Back to the Future: The Concept of ‘Comprehensive Solutions’. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 2012 Sep 1;31(3):101–36.

166.
Haddad E. The refugee in international society: between sovereigns. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

167.
Hathaway JC. The rights of refugees under international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

168.
Hollenbach D, Boston College. Center for Human Rights and International Justice. Driven from home: protecting the rights of forced migrants [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press; 2010. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781589016798/

169.
Hurwitz AG. The collective responsibility of states to protect refugees [Internet]. Vol. Oxford monographs in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278381.001.0001

170.
Internal displacement in armed conflict: facing up to the challenges - ICRC [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/icrc_002_4014.pdf

171.
Internally displaced persons and international humanitarian law - International Committee of the Red Cross [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/internally-displaced-persons-and-international-humanitarian-law-factsheet

172.
Loescher G. Protracted refugee situations: political, human rights and security implications. Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 2008.

173.
Loescher G, Betts A, Milner J. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): the politics and practice of refugee protection into the 21st century. Vol. Routledge global institutions. London: Routledge; 2008.

174.
Loescher G, Milner J. The long road home: Protracted refugee situations in Africa. Survival. 2005 Jun;47(2):153–74.

175.
McAdam J. Forced migration, human rights and security. Vol. Studies in international law. Oxford: Hart; 2008.

176.
Newland K, Patrick E, Zard M, United Nations. Internal Displacement Unit. No refuge: the challenge of internal displacement. New York: United Nations; 2003.

177.
Orchard P. The Perils of Humanitarianism: Refugee and IDP Protection in Situations of Regime-induced Displacement. Refugee Survey Quarterly. 2010 Jan 1;29(1):38–60.

178.
Phuong C. The international protection of internally displaced persons. Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.

179.
Weiss TG, Korn DA. Internal displacement: conceptualization and its consequences. Vol. Global institutions series. London: Routledge; 2006.

180.
United Nations Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (2nd edition, 2004) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/uk/protection/idps/43ce1cff2/guiding-principles-internal-displacement.html

181.
UNHCR - African Union Convention for the Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons in Africa (Kampala Convention) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/4ae9bede9.html

182.
UNHCR - Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement [Internet]. 2nd ed. 2004. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/43ce1cff2.html

183.
Terhalle M, Depledge J. Great-power politics, order transition, and climate governance: insights from international relations theory. Climate Policy. 2013 Sep;13(5):572–88.

184.
Principled Exclusion: A Revised Approach to Article1(F)(a) of the Refugee Convention [Internet]. Available from: http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=mjil

185.
Rome Statute of the ICC (1998).pdf [Internet]. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/nr/rdonlyres/ea9aeff7-5752-4f84-be94-0a655eb30e16/0/rome_statute_english.pdf

186.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

187.
Danner, A, Martinez J. Guilty associations: Joint criminal enterprise, command responsibility, and the development of international criminal law. California Law Review [Internet]. 2005;93(1):75–169. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3481390

188.
Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Appeals Chamber Judgment, ICC Case No. 01/04-01/06 (1 December 2014).pdf [Internet]. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/doc/doc1876833.pdf

189.
Prosecutor v. Saif al-Islam Gaddafi & Abdullah al-Senussi, Decision on the appeal of Mr Abdullah Al-Senussi against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I of 11 October 2013 entitled ‘Decision on the admissibility of the case against Abdullah Al-Senussi,’ ICC Case No. ICC-01/11-01/11 OA 6 (24 July 2014) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.icc-cpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/situations/icc0111/related%20cases/icc01110111/court%20records/chambers/appeals%20chamber/Pages/565.aspx

190.
Anderson K. The Rise of International Criminal Law: Intended and Unintended Consequences. European Journal of International Law. 2009 Apr 1;20(2):331–58.

191.
Akhavan P. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities? The American Journal of International Law. 2001;95(1).

192.
Ambos K. Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005 Nov 24;5(1):159–83.

193.
Bantekas I. International criminal law. 4th ed. Oxford: Hart; 2010.

194.
Bassiouni MC. Introduction to international criminal law. Second revised edition. Vol. International criminal law series. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2013.

195.
Bassiouni MC. International criminal law. 3rd ed. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2008.

196.
Bellelli R. International criminal justice: law and practice from the Rome Statute to its review. Farnham: Ashgate; 2010.

197.
Cassese A. The Proper Limits of Individual Responsibility under the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005 Nov 24;5(1):109–33.

198.
Zahar A, Sluiter G. International criminal law: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

199.
Cassese A. The Oxford companion to international criminal justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

200.
Cryer R. An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

201.
Yoram Dinstein, International Criminal Law, 20 Isr. L. Rev. 206 (1985). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/israel20&div=24&g_sent=1&collection=journals

202.
Ohlin JD. Three Conceptual Problems with the Doctrine of Joint Criminal Enterprise. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005 Nov 24;5(1):69–90.

203.
van Sliedregt E. Joint Criminal Enterprise as a Pathway to Convicting Individuals for Genocide. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2005 Nov 24;5(1):184–207.

204.
Sands P. From Nuremberg to the Hague: the future of international criminal justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

205.
Schabas W. The UN international criminal tribunals: the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

206.
Schabas W. An introduction to the International Criminal Court [Internet]. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511987502

207.
Tams CJ. Enforcing obligations erga omnes in international law. Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

208.
Zahar A, Sluiter G. International criminal law: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.

209.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013).

210.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

211.
Jones v. United Kingdom, ECtHR, App. Nos. 34356/06 & 40528/06 (2014) [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140005#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-140005%22]}

212.
Lawfare Alien Tort Statute: Litigation [Internet]. Available from: https://www.lawfareblog.com/topic/alien-tort-statute-litigation

213.
Abi - Saab G. The Proper Role of Universal Jurisdiction. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 1(3):596–602.

214.
Arbour L. Will the ICC have an Impact on Universal Jurisdiction? Journal of International Criminal Justice. 1(3):585–8.

215.
Akande D. International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court. The American Journal of International Law. 2004;98(3).

216.
Akande D, Shah S. Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts. European Journal of International Law. 2010 Nov 1;21(4):815–52.

217.
AGORA: Reflections on kiobel. The American Journal of International Law. 2013 Oct;107(4):829–34.

218.
John B. Bellinger, Enforcing Human Rights in US Courts and Abroad: The Alien Tort Statute and Other Approaches, 42 Vand. J. Transnat’l L.1 (2009) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/78/bellinger-speech-final_x.pdf

219.
Bianchi A. Immunity versus human rights: the Pinochet case. European Journal of International Law. 1999;10(2):237–77.

220.
Caplan LM. State Immunity, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens: A Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory. The American Journal of International Law. 2003;97(4).

221.
Cassese A. When May Senior State Officials Be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on the Congo v. Belgium Case. European Journal of International Law. 2002 Sep 1;13(4):853–75.

222.
Davis J. Justice across borders: the struggle for human rights in U.S. courts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

223.
Gallagher K. Civil Litigation and Transnational Business: An Alien Tort Statute Primer. Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2010 Jul 1;8(3):745–67.

224.
Henner P. Human rights and the alien tort statute [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=17bB1HA_Mx0C&pg=PR2&lpg=PR2&dq=Peter+Henner,+Human+Rights+and+the+Alien+Tort+Statute+(2009)&source=bl&ots=ZuxzVhZJBh&sig=4FHY2EwqsGos5pj1ScJ8Ds878Z8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwja2czb4eLJAhXERw8KHT8zBpkQ6AEIVjAJ#v=onepage&q=Peter%20Henner%2C%20Human%20Rights%20and%20the%20Alien%20Tort%20Statute%20(2009)&f=false

225.
Koh H. How is international human rights law enforced? Indiana Law Journal [Internet]. 1999;74(4):1397–417. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/indana74&id=1407

226.
Lawfare Alien Tort Statute: Litigation [Internet]. Available from: https://www.lawfareblog.com/topic/alien-tort-statute-litigation

227.
The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction (2001).pdf [Internet]. Available from: https://lapa.princeton.edu/hosteddocs/unive_jur.pdf

228.
Moyn S. Why the Court Was Right About the Alien Tort Statute | Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2013-05-02/why-court-was-right-about-alien-tort-statute

229.
Opinio Juris Blog Archive Kiobel Roundtable: The Alien Tort Statute, Kiobel, and Extraterritoriality [Internet]. Available from: http://opiniojuris.org/2012/10/02/the-alien-tort-statute-kiobel-and-extraterritoriality/

230.
Orakhelashvili A. State Immunity and Hierarchy of Norms: Why the House of Lords Got It Wrong. European Journal of International Law. 2007 Nov 1;18(5):955–70.

231.
Ryngaert C. Jurisdiction in international law. Second edition. Vol. Oxford monographs in international law. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2015.

232.
Slaughter, Am ; Burke-White, W. The future of international law is domestic (or, the European way of law). Available from: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1958&context=faculty_scholarship

233.
Steinhardt RG, D’Amato AA. The Alien Tort Claims Act: an analytical anthology. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers; 1999.

234.
Stephens B, Ratner M. International human rights litigation in U.S. courts. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: Transnational Publishers; 1996.

235.
Stephens, Beth. Translating Filártiga: A Comparative and International Law Analysis of Domestic Remedies for International Human Rights Violations. 2002; Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2125469

236.
Turns D. Pinochet’s fallout: jurisdiction and immunity for criminal violations of international law. Legal Studies. 2000 Nov;20(4):566–91.

237.
Kiobel and the Weakening of Precedent: A Long Walk for a Short Drink. The American Journal of International Law. 2013 Oct;107(4):841–5.

238.
Winkler, Matteo M.1. What Remains of the Alien Tort Statute After Kiobel? North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation [Internet]. 2013;39(1):171–90. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=92606781&site=ehost-live&scope=site

239.
Introductory Note To KIOBEL V. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM CO. (U.S. SUP. CT.). International Legal Materials. 2013 Jan;52(4):966–84.

240.
Doe I v. Unocal, 395 F.3d 932 (9th Cir. 2002).

241.
In re South African Apartheid Litigation, Ntsebeza v. Ford, 15 F.Supp.3d 454 (2014).

242.
AFPS & PLO v Alstom & Veolia, Versailles Court of Appeal, 52 Int’l Legal Materials 1161 (22 March 2013). International Legal Materials.

243.
Akpan v. Royal Dutch Shell, Rechtbank Den Haag [District Court of The Hague], LJN BY9854, C/09/337050 HA ZA 09-1580 (30 January 2013).

244.
Schutter, Olivier De ; Eide, Asbjørn ; Khalfan, Ashfaq ; Orellana, Marcos ; Salomon, Margot E ; Seiderman, Ian D. Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23352240?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

245.
Amnesty International, Comments in response to the UN Special Representative of the Secretary General on Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises’ Guiding Principles – Proposed Outline [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/IOR50/001/2010/en/

246.
The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/27/37 (June 30, 2014).pdf [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/RegularSessions/Session27/Documents/A.HRC.27.37_en.pdf

247.
Albin-Lackey C. ‘Without Rules: A Failed Approach to Corporate Accountability’ (Human Rights Watch, 2013).pdf [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/business.pdf

248.
Ratner SR. Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility. The Yale Law Journal. 2001;111(3).

249.
Harvard Kennedy School [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg

250.
J. Business and Human Rights -Treaty Road not Travelled.pdf [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/news/ruggie/Pages%20from%20ECM%20May_FINAL_JohnRuggie_may%2010.pdf

251.
Alston P, Academy of European Law, New York University. Center for Human Rights and Global Justice. Non-state actors and human rights. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

252.
Alvarez JE. Are Corporations ‘Subjects’ of International Law?, 9 Santa Clara J. Intl L. 1 (2011).pdf [Internet]. Available from: http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/ECM_PRO_069097.pdf

253.
AGORA: Reflections on Kiobel. The American Journal of International Law. 2013 Oct;107(4):829–34.

254.
Baxi U. Market Fundamentalisms: Business Ethics at the Altar of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2005 Jan 1;5(1):1–26.

255.
Backer LC. On the Evolution of the United Nations ‘Protect-Respect-Remedy’ Project: The State, the Corporation and Human Rights in a Global Governance Context.cgi [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1092&context=scujil

256.
Clapham A, Academy of European Law. Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

257.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

258.
AJ Dignam and D Allen. Company Law and the Human Rights Act 1998 (2000). 2001;60(3):628–9. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1839459

259.
Emberland M. The human rights of companies: exploring the structure of ECHR protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

260.
French PA. The Corporation as a Moral Person. American Philosophical Quarterly [Internet]. 1979;16(3):207–15. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20009760

261.
Ijalaye DA. The Extension of Corporate Personality in International Law. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y: Oceana Publications; 1978.

262.
Report of the ICJ Expert Legal Panel on Corporate Complicity in International Crimes: 3 vols [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.icj.org/report-of-the-international-commission-of-jurists-expert-legal-panel-on-corporate-complicity-in-international-crimes/

263.
Jägers NMCP. Corporate human rights obligations: in search of accountability. Vol. School of Human Rights Research series. Antwerpen: Intersentia; 2002.

264.
Joseph S. Corporations and transnational human rights litigation. Vol. Human rights law in perspective. London: Hart Publishing; 2004.

265.
Kamminga MT, Zia-Zarifi S. Liability of multinational corporations under international law. Vol. Studies and materials on the settlement of international disputes. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2000.

266.
D Kinley and J Tadaki. From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law [Internet]. 2003. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=923360

267.
Kobrin SJ. Private Political Authority and Public Responsibility: Transnational Politics, Transnational Firms, and Human Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2009;19(03):349–74.

268.
Corporations as International Actors and International Law Makers. The Italian Yearbook of International Law Online. 2004 Jan 1;14(1):23–38.

269.
May L. Vicarious agency and corporate responsibility. Philosophical Studies. 1983 Jan;43(1):69–82.

270.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law [Internet]. Second edition. Vol. The Oxford international law library. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:iic/9780199227969.book.1/law-iic-9780199227969

271.
Muchlinski P. Implementing the New UN Corporate Human Rights Framework. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2012;22(1):145–77.

272.
Karsten Nowrot. Reconceptualising International Legal Personality of Influential Non-State Actors: Towards a Rebuttable Presumption of Normative Responsibilities. Philippine Law Journal/ Law Journal Library [Internet]. 2005;80:563–86. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Print?handle=hein.journals/philplj80&div=33&start_page=563&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults&print=section&format=PDFsearchable&submit=Print%2FDownload

273.
Pettit P. Responsibility Incorporated. Ethics. 2007 Jan;117(2):171–201.

274.
Portmann R. Legal Personality in International Law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511779848

275.
Ruggie JG. Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2007;101(4):819–40. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40006320

276.
John Ruggie. Treaty road not travelled | Business & Human Rights Resource Centre [Internet]. Available from: http://business-humanrights.org/en/pdf-treaty-road-not-travelled

277.
Ruskola T. Conceptualizing Corporations and Kinship: Comparative Law and Development Theory in a Chinese Perspective. Stanford Law Review. 2000;52(6).

278.
Seidl-Hohenveldern I. Corporations in and under international law. Oxford: Grotius Publications; 1987.

279.
Stoitchkova D. Towards corporate liability in international criminal law. Vol. School of Human Rights Research series. Antwerp: Intersentia; 2010.

280.
Velasquez M. Why corporations are not morally responsible for anything they do. Business & Professional Ethics Journal [Internet]. 1983;2(3):1–18. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27799793?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

281.
Velasquez M. Debunking Corporate Moral Responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2003;13(4):531–62.

282.
Zerk JA. Multinationals and corporate social responsibility: limitations and opportunities in international law. Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

283.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises [Internet]. 2011th ed. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en

284.
OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions - OECD [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/corruption/oecdantibriberyconvention.htm

285.
ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles on Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy.pdf [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/---multi/documents/publication/wcms_094386.pdf

286.
ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (DECLARATION). 1998; Available from: http://www.ilo.org/declaration/lang--en/index.htm

287.
Freedman, Rosa. New Mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council. 2013; Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2338595

288.
Forsythe DP. Human rights in international relations. 3rd ed. Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

289.
Pegram T. Global human rights governance and orchestration: National human rights institutions as intermediaries. European Journal of International Relations. 2015 Sep 1;21(3):595–620.

290.
Boyle K. Marking Another Birthday: Ten Years of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights [Internet]. 2004; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nethqur37&id=301

291.
Krause C, Scheinin M, Åbo akademi (1918- ). Institutet för mänskliga rättigheter. International protection of human rights: a textbook. Turku: Åbo Akademi University, Institute for Human Rights; 2009.

292.
Schutter O de. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

293.
Kälin W, Künzli J. The law of international human rights protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

294.
Mertus J. The United Nations and human rights: a guide for a new era [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. Routledge global institutions. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d03e3f8e-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099

295.
Oberleitner G. Decade of Mainstream Human Rights in the UN: Achievements, Failures, Challenges, A. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights [Internet]. 2008; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nethqur41&id=359

296.
Hannum H. Guide to international human rights practice. 4th ed. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers; 2004.

297.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

298.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

299.
Human Rights Bodies [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/HumanRightsBodies.aspx

300.
Abebe AM. Of Shaming and Bargaining: African States and the Universal Periodic Review of the United Nations Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review. 2009 Feb 2;9(1):1–35.

301.
Alston P. Reconceiving the UN human rights regime: challenges confronting the new UN human rights council. Melbourne Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2006;7(1):185–224. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/217519431?accountid=14511

302.
Boyle K. New institutions for human rights protection. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

303.
Boyle K. New institutions for human rights protection. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

304.
Cohen S. Government Responses to Human Rights Reports: Claims, Denials, and Counterclaims. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1996;18(3):517–43. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/762471

305.
Gaer FD. A Voice Not an Echo: Universal Periodic Review and the UN Treaty Body System. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):109–39.

306.
Ghanea N. I. From UN Commission on Human Rights to UN Human Rights Council: One step forwards or two steps sideways? International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006;55(03):695–705.

307.
Hampson FJ. An Overview of the Reform of the UN Human Rights Machinery. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):7–27.

308.
Lauren PG. ‘To Preserve and Build on its Achievements and to Redress its Shortcomings’: The Journey from the Commission on Human Rights to the Human Rights Council. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2007;29(2):307–45. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072801

309.
Boyle K. New institutions for human rights protection. Vol. The collected courses of the Academy of European Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

310.
Scannella P, Splinter P. The United Nations Human Rights Council: A Promise to be Fulfilled. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):41–72.

311.
Sweeney G, Saito Y. An NGO Assessment of the New Mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council. Human Rights Law Review. 2009 Jan 1;9(2):203–23.

312.
Gutter J. Special Procedures and the Human Rights Council: Achievements and Challenges Ahead. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):93–107.

313.
Nifosi I. The UN special procedures in the field of human rights. Antwerpen: Intersentia; 2005.

314.
Piccone T. The contribution of the UN’s special procedures to national level implementation of human rights norms. The International Journal of Human Rights. 2011 Feb;15(2):206–31.

315.
Pinheiro, P. Musings of a UN special rapporteur on human rights. Global Governance [Internet]. 2003;9(1):7–13. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27800460

316.
Suvedī S. Protection of Human Rights through the Mechanism of UN Special Rapporteurs. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2011;33(1):201–28. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v033/33.1.subedi.html

317.
Evans G. The Responsibility to Protect: An Idea Whose Time Has Come ... and Gone? International Relations. 2008 Sep 1;22(3):283–98.

318.
Evans G. From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect Symposium on Humanitarian Intervention after 9/11 24 Wisconsin International Law Journal 2006-2007 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/wisint24&div=35&id=&page=

319.
Gaer FD. A Voice Not an Echo: Universal Periodic Review and the UN Treaty Body System. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):109–39.

320.
Simmons BA. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

321.
Goodman, R, Jinks D. How to influence states: Socialization and international human rights law. Duke Law Journal [Internet]. 2004;54(3):621–703. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40040439

322.
Cardenas S. Conflict and compliance: state responses to international human rights pressure. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2007.

323.
Cardenas S. Norm Collision: Explaining the Effects of International Human Rights Pressure on State Behavior. International Studies Review. 2004 Jun;6(2):213–32.

324.
Cassel, DC. Does International Human Rights Law Make a Difference? Chicago Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2001;2(1):121–35. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/60140744?accountid=14511

325.
Dai X. Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism. International Organization [Internet]. 2005 Apr;59(02). Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-organization/article/why-comply-the-domestic-constituency-mechanism/11237F977932D564B1391659ED4219D8

326.
Engstrom, Par. Effectiveness of International and Regional Human Rights Regimes. 2010; Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2004309

327.
Goodliffe J, Hawkins DG. Explaining Commitment: States and the Convention against Torture. The Journal of Politics. 2006 May;68(02).

328.
Goodman R, Jinks D. Incomplete Internalization and Compliance with Human Rights Law. European Journal of International Law. 2008 Sep 1;19(4):725–48.

329.
Goodman R. Measuring the Effects of Human Rights Treaties. European Journal of International Law. 2003;14(1):171–83.

330.
Hafner-Burton E, Ron J. SEEING DOUBLE: Human Rights Impact through Qualitative and Quantitative Eyes. World Politics [Internet]. 2009;61(2). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40263486?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

331.
Hafner-Burton EM, Ron J. Human Rights Institutions: Rhetoric and Efficacy. Journal of Peace Research. 2007 Jul 1;44(4):379–84.

332.
Hafner-Burton EM, Tsutsui K. Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law To Matter Where Needed Most. Journal of Peace Research. 2007 Jul 1;44(4):407–25.

333.
Hathaway OA. Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2007 Aug 1;51(4):588–621.

334.
Hathaway OA. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? The Yale Law Journal. 2002;111(8).

335.
Heyns C, Viljoen F. The Impact of the United Nations Human Rights Treaties on the Domestic Level. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2001;23(3):483–535. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4489346

336.
Keith LC. The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does It Make a Difference in Human Rights Behavior? Journal of Peace Research. 1999;36(1):95–118.

337.
Koh HH, Chayes A, Chayes AH, Franck TM. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? The Yale Law Journal. 1997 Jun;106(8).

338.
Neumayer E. Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution. 2005 Dec 1;49(6):925–53.

339.
Carlsnaes W, Risse-Kappen T, Simmons BA. Handbook of international relations [Internet]. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2013. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446265031

340.
Crawford J, Alston P. The future of UN human rights treaty monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

341.
Crawford J, Alston P. The future of UN human rights treaty monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

342.
de Albuquerque C. Chronicle of an Announced Birth: The Coming into Life of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—The Missing Piece of the International Bill of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2010;32(1):144–78.

343.
Lee Y. Communications procedure under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: 3rd Optional Protocol. The International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2010 Nov 1;18(4):567–83.

344.
Mahon C. Progress at the Front: The Draft Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2008 Oct 21;8(4):617–46.

345.
Julie Mertus. The United Nations and human rights: a guide for a new era [Internet]. 2nd ed. Vol. Routledge global institutions. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203878019

346.
Nowak M. The Need for a World Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):251–9.

347.
OHCHR, Concept Paper on the High Commissioner’s Proposal for a Unified Standing Treaty Body, 22 March 2006.pdf [Internet]. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/icm-mc/docs/HRI.MC.2006.2.pdf

348.
O’Flaherty M. Reform of the UN Human Rights Treaty Body System: Locating the Dublin Statement. Human Rights Law Review. 2010 Jun 1;10(2):319–35.

349.
O’Flaherty M, O’Brien C. Reform of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Bodies: A Critique of the Concept Paper on the High Commissioner’s Proposal for a Unified Standing Treaty Body. Human Rights Law Review. 2007 Feb 8;7(1):141–72.

350.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

351.
Human Rights Bodies [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/HumanRightsBodies.aspx

352.
Engstrom, Par. Effectiveness of International and Regional Human Rights Regimes. 2010; Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2004309

353.
Moravcsik A. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization. 2000 Apr 1;54(2):217–52.

354.
Cavallaro J, Brewer S. Reevaluating regional human rights litigation in the twenty-first century: the case of the inter-American court. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2008;102(4):768–827. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20456681?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

355.
Cassese A. International criminal law: cases and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

356.
Happold M. II. Darfur, the Security Council, and the International Criminal Court. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2006;55(01):226–36.

357.
Schutter O de. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

358.
Shelton D. Regional protection of human rights. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.

359.
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.

360.
Baderin MA, McCorquodale R. Economic, social and cultural rights in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

361.
Bojosi, Kealeboga, Wachira, George. Protecting indigenous peoples in Africa: an analysis of the approach of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. African Human Rights Law Journal [Internet]. 2006;6(2). Available from: http://www.ahrlj.up.ac.za/bojosi-k-n-wachira-g-m

362.
Mbazira C. Enforcing the economic, social and cultural rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: twenty years of redundancy, progression and significant strides. African human rights law journal [Internet]. 2006;6(2):333–57. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/afrhurlj6&id=343

363.
Murray R. Recent Developments in the African Human Rights System 2007. Human Rights Law Review. 2008 Jan 1;8(2):356–76.

364.
Murray R. Serious or Massive Violations under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: A Comparison with the Inter-American and European Mechanisms. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights [Internet]. 1999; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nethqur32&id=119

365.
Mutua M. The African Human Rights Court: A Two-Legged Stool? Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1999;21(2):342–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/762708

366.
Evans MD, Murray R. The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: the system in practice, 1986-2006. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

367.
Okafor OC. The African Human Rights System, Activist Forces and International Institutions [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511494048

368.
Udombana NJ. So Far, so Fair: The Local Remedies Rule in the Jurisprudence of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. The American Journal of International Law. 2003;97(1).

369.
Udombana, NJ. Between promise and performance: Revisiting states’ obligations under the African human rights charter. Stanford Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2004;40:105–42. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/stanit40&id=115

370.
Viljoen F. International human rights law in Africa [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199645589.001.0001

371.
Buergenthal T. The evolving international human rights system. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2006;100(4):783–807. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4126317

372.
Cavallaro, James, Schaffer, Emily. Justice before justiciability: inter-American litigation and social change. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 2006;39(09–29). Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1404136

373.
Cavallaro et al. JL. Less as more: Rethinking supranational litigation of economic and social rights in the Americas. Hastings Law Journal [Internet]. 2004;56(2):217–81. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hastlj56&id=247

374.
Serrano M, Popovski V. Human rights regimes in the Americas. Shibuya-ku, Tokyo: United Nations University Press; 2010.

375.
Farer T. The rise of the inter-American human rights regime: no longer a unicorn, not yet an ox. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1997;19(3):510–46. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/762724?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

376.
Tinta, Mónica Feria. Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in the Inter-American System of Protection of Human Rights: Beyond Traditional Paradigms and Notions. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 29(2):431–59. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20072805?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

377.
Goldman RK. History and Action: The Inter-American Human Rights System and the Role of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 2009;31(4):856–87.

378.
Harris DJ, Livingstone S. The inter-American system of human rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.

379.
Helfer LR. Overlegalizing Human Rights: International Relations Theory and the Commonwealth Caribbean Backlash against Human Rights Regimes. Columbia Law Review. 2002 Nov;102(7).

380.
Melish, T. Rethinking the ‘Less as More’ Thesis: Supranational Litigation of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights in the Americas. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 2006;39(2):171–343. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nyuilp39&id=179

381.
Melish T. Justice vs. justiciability? Normative neutrality and technical precision, the role of the lawyer in supranational social rights litigation. Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 2006;39(2). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp39&id=1&size=2&collection=journals&index=journals/nyuilp

382.
Neuman GL. Import, Export, and Regional Consent in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 2008 Feb 1;19(1):101–23.

383.
Pasqualucci JM. The practice and procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.

384.
Simmons WP. Remedies for Women of Ciudad Juarez through the Inter-American Court of Human Rights - viewcontent.cgi [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=njihr

385.
Simmons WP. Remedies for Women of Ciudad Juarez through the Inter-American Court of Human Rights - viewcontent.cgi [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=njihr

386.
Tittemore BD. Guantanamo Bay and the Precautionary Measures of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights: A Case for International Oversight in the Struggle Against Terrorism. Human Rights Law Review. 2006 Jul 22;6(2):378–402.

387.
Hashimoto H. The prospects for a regional human rights mechanism in East Asia. Vol. East Asia : history, politics, sociology, culture. New York; London: Routledge; 2004.

388.
Harris S. Asian Human Rights: Forming a Regional Covenant.pdf [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.chinesehumanrightsreader.org/academic/seth.pdf

389.
Why do we need a Pacific Regional Human Rights Commission [Internet]. Available from: http://www.austlii.edu.au/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2009/11.pdf

390.
Möller JT, Alfredsson G. International human rights monitoring mechanisms: essays in honour of Jakob Th. Möller. Vol. The Raoul Wallenberg Institute human rights library. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2001.

391.
Rishmawi M. The Arab Charter on Human Rights and the League of Arab States: An Update. Human Rights Law Review. 2010 Mar 1;10(1):169–78.

392.
Rishmawi M. The Revised Arab Charter on Human Rights: A Step Forward? Human Rights Law Review. 2005 Jan 1;5(2):361–76.

393.
Alston P, Bustelo MR, Heenan J. The EU and human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.

394.
Hannum H. Guide to international human rights practice. 4th ed. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers; 2004.

395.
The Ligitimacy of the ECHR: A view from the ground [Internet]. Available from: https://ecthrproject.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/ecthrlegitimacyreport.pdf

396.
Baderin MA, McCorquodale R. Economic, social and cultural rights in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

397.
De Beco G. Human rights monitoring mechanisms of the Council of Europe. Vol. Routledge research in human rights law. London: Routledge; 2012.

398.
Schutter OD. The two Europes of human rights: the emerging division of tasks between the council of Europe and the European Union in promoting human rights in Europe. Columbia Journal of European Law [Internet]. 92(1):53–102. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/coljeul14&div=22&id=&page=&collection=journals

399.
Follesdal A. The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy. 2009 Dec;40(4):595–607.

400.
Greer S. What’s Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights? Human Rights Quarterly. 2008;30(3):680–702.

401.
Helfer LR. Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: Embeddedness as a Deep Structural Principle of the European Human Rights Regime. European Journal of International Law. 2008 Feb 1;19(1):125–59.

402.
Eaton M, Schokkenbroek JGC. Teaching Collection (School of Public Policy / PUBLG063): Reforming the human rights protection system established by the European Convention on Human Rights. 2005;

403.
Lagoutte S, Sano HO, Smith PS. Human rights in turmoil: facing threats, consolidating achievements. Vol. International studies in human rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2007.

404.
Madsen MR. From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics. Law & Social Inquiry. 2007 Mar 2;32(1):137–59.

405.
Moravcsik A. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization. 2000 Apr 1;54(2):217–52.

406.
Reidy A, Hampson F, Boyle K. Gross Violations of Human Rights: Invoking the European Convention on Human Rights in the Case of Turkey [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nethqur30&id=172

407.
Sadurski W. Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, the Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe, and the Idea of Pilot Judgments. Human Rights Law Review. 2009 Jan 1;9(3):397–453.

408.
Simpson AWB. Human rights and the end of empire: Britain and the genesis of the European Convention. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.

409.
Ryan Goodman, Thomas Innes Pegram. Human rights, state compliance, and social change: assessing national human rights institutions [Internet]. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/human-rights-state-compliance-and-social-change/889EB7C5A98F20C5F714F608E41BF5DE

410.
Carver R. A New Answer to an Old Question: National Human Rights Institutions and the Domestication of International Law. Human Rights Law Review. 2010 Mar 1;10(1):1–32.

411.
Steinerte E. The Jewel in the Crown and Its Three Guardians: Independence of National Preventive Mechanisms Under the Optional Protocol to the UN Torture Convention. Human Rights Law Review. 2014 Mar 1;14(1):1–29.

412.
Halliday S, Schmidt PD. Human rights brought home: socio-legal studies of human rights in the national context. Vol. Human rights law in perspective. Oxford: Hart; 2004.

413.
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, Harris DJ. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

414.
Cardenas S, Flibbert A. National Human Rights Institutions in the Middle East. Middle East Journal [Internet]. 2005;59(3):411–36. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4330156

415.
Cardenas S. Transgovernmental Activism: Canada’s Role in Promoting National Human Rights Commissions. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069686

416.
de Beco G. Networks of European National Human Rights Institutions. European Law Journal. 2008 Nov;14(6):860–77.

417.
Goodman R, Pegram TI. Human rights, state compliance, and social change: assessing national human rights institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

418.
Hafner-Burton E. Making human rights a reality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2013.

419.
International Council on Human Rights Policy (ICHRP) and OHCHR, Assessing the Effectiveness of National Human Rights Institutions.pdf [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://www.ichrp.org/files/reports/18/125_report.pdf

420.
Bergsmo M, Eide A. Human rights and criminal justice for the downtrodden: essays in honour of Asbjørn Eide. Leiden: Marinus Nijhoff; 2003.

421.
Koo JW, Ramirez FO. National Incorporation of Global Human Rights: Worldwide Expansion of National Human Rights Institutions, 1966-2004. Social Forces [Internet]. 2009;87(3):1321–53. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40345163?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

422.
Harvey CJ. Human rights in the community: rights as agents for change. Vol. Human rights law in perspective. Oxford: Hart; 2005.

423.
Mertus J. Human rights matters: local politics and national human rights institutions. Vol. Stanford studies in human rights. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 2009.

424.
Murray R. National Human Rights Institutions - Criteria and Factors for Assessing Their Effectiveness. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights [Internet]. 2007; Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/nethqur40&id=189

425.
O’Cinneide C. The Commission for Equality and Human Rights:A New Institution for New and Uncertain Times. Industrial Law Journal. 2007 Jun 1;36(2):141–62.

426.
Pegram T. Diffusion Across Political Systems: The Global Spread of National Human Rights Institutions. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2010;32(3):729–60. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v032/32.3.pegram.html

427.
Kumar CR. National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Toward the Institutionalization and Developmentalization of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2006;28(3):755–79. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072761

428.
Kumar, C. National Human Rights Institutions: Good Governance Perspectives on Institutionalization of Human Rights. American University International Law Review [Internet]. 2003;19(2):259–300. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/amuilr19&id=273

429.
Reif LC. The ombudsman, good governance, and the international human rights system. Vol. International studies in human rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2004.

430.
Catherine RENSHAW, Andrew BYRNES, Andrea DURBACH. Testing the Mettle of National Human Rights Institutions: A Case Study of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia. Asian Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2011 Jan;1(01):165–98. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/asian-journal-of-international-law/article/testing-the-mettle-of-national-human-rights-institutions-a-case-study-of-the-human-rights-commission-of-malaysia/05380491926959A43DA93C50E378E3FB/core-reader

431.
Smith A. The Unique Position of National Human Rights Institutions: A Mixed Blessing? SSRN Electronic Journal [Internet]. 2009;28(4):904–46. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072772

432.
Halliday S, Schmidt PD. Human rights brought home: socio-legal studies of human rights in the national context. Vol. Human rights law in perspective. Oxford: Hart; 2004.

433.
Halliday S, Schmidt PD. Human rights brought home: socio-legal studies of human rights in the national context. Vol. Human rights law in perspective. Oxford: Hart; 2004.

434.
Evans MD, Haenni - Dale C. PREVENTING TORTURE? THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE UN CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2004;4(1):19–55. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/hrlr4&page=19&collection=journals

435.
Kelly T. The UN Committee Against Torture: Human Rights Monitoring and the Legal Recognition of Cruelty. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2009;31(3):777–800. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40389967

436.
Murray R. The Optional Protocol to the UN Convention Against Torture. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

437.
Audrey, Narvaez M. OPCAT Challenges and the Way Forwards: The ratification and implementation of the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture.pdf [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V6N1/OlivierNarvaez.pdf

438.
Rodley NS. Reflections on Working for the Prevention of Torture A4 FINAL - Rodley.pdf [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://projects.essex.ac.uk/ehrr/V6N1/Rodley.pdf

439.
Steinerte E, Murray R. Same but Different? National human rights commission and ombudsman institutions as national preventive mechanisms under the Optional Protocol to the UN Torture Convention.pdf [Internet]. 2009. Available from: https://www.hrc.co.nz/files/7214/2550/8359/Steinerte__Murray_year_-_National_human_rights_commissions_and_ombudsman_institutions_as_NPMs_under_OPCAT.pdf

440.
Optional Protocol [Internet]. Available from: http://search.ohchr.org/results.aspx?k=Optional%20Protocol#k=Optional%20Protocol

441.
NHRI - Torture & Prevention [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/PreventingTorture.pdf

442.
Hopgood S. The endtimes of human rights. Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2013.

443.
Donnelly J. The Relative Universality of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2007;29(2):281–306. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072800

444.
Goodhart ME. Neither Relative nor Universal: A Response to Donnelly. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;30(1):183–93. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20486702

445.
Donnelly J. Human Rights: Both Universal and Relative (A Reply to Michael Goodhart). Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;30(1):194–204. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20486703

446.
ACHARYA A. Can Asia lead? Power ambitions and global governance in the twenty-first century. International Affairs. 2011 Jul;87(4):851–69.

447.
ALDEN C, SCHOEMAN M. South Africa in the company of giants: the search for leadership in a transforming global order. International Affairs. 2013 Jan;89(1):111–29.

448.
Andreasson S. Africa’s prospects and South Africa’s leadership potential in the emerging markets century. Third World Quarterly. 2011 Jul;32(6):1165–81.

449.
The Rise and Fall of International Human Rights - International Crisis Group [Internet]. 2011. Available from: https://www.crisisgroup.org/global/rise-and-fall-international-human-rights

450.
Borer TA, Mills K. Explaining Postapartheid South African Human Rights Foreign Policy: Unsettled Identity and Unclear Interests. Journal of Human Rights. 2011 Jan;10(1):76–98.

451.
Bennett S, O’Brien É, University of London. School of Advanced Study. What future for human rights in a non-western world? London: Human Rights Consortium; 2012.

452.
BRESLIN S. China and the global order: signalling threat or friendship? International Affairs. 2013 May;89(3):615–34.

453.
Burges SW. Strategies and Tactics for Global Change: Democratic Brazil in Comparative Perspective. Global Society. 2012 Jul;26(3):351–68.

454.
Buzan B. The Inaugural Kenneth N. Waltz Annual Lecture A World Order Without Superpowers: Decentred Globalism. International Relations. 2011 Mar 1;25(1):3–25.

455.
Donnelly, Jack. Human Rights: Both Universal and Relative (A Reply to Michael Goodhart). Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 30(1):194–204. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20486703?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

456.
Dunne T. The Liberal Order and the Modern Project. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2010 May 1;38(3):535–43.

457.
Engstrom P. Brazilian Foreign Policy and Human Rights: Change and Continuity under Dilma. Critical Sociology. 2012 Nov 1;38(6):835–49.

458.
Bennett S, O’Brien É, University of London. School of Advanced Study. What future for human rights in a non-western world? London: Human Rights Consortium; 2012.

459.
Engstrom P. The Future of Human Rights in a Global Order of Change and Continuity. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2012;

460.
Florini A. Rising Asian Powers and Changing Global Governance. International Studies Review. 2011 Mar;13(1):24–33.

461.
Føllesdal A, Schaffer JK, Ulfstein G. The legitimacy of international human rights regimes: legal, political and philosophical perspectives. Vol. Studies on human rights conventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.

462.
Foot R. Rights beyond borders: the global community and the struggle over human rights in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.

463.
Franck, TM. Is personal freedom a western value? The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 91(4):593–627. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2998096?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents

464.
Freeman D, Geeraerts G. Europe, China, and Expectations for Human Rights. The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2011 Jun 1;4(2):179–203.

465.
Hart AF, Jones BD. How Do Rising Powers Rise? Survival. 2010 Dec;52(6):63–88.

466.
Rising to the Challenge | Human Rights Watch [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hrw.org/video-photos/audio/2010/09/03/rising-challenge

467.
George Soros to Give $100 million to Human Rights Watch | Human Rights Watch [Internet]. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/news/2010/09/07/george-soros-give-100-million-human-rights-watch

468.
Hurrell A. On global order: power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

469.
A Hurrell. International Law 1989-2010: A Performance Appraisal.pdf [Internet]. Available from: https://www.lcil.cam.ac.uk/esil-4th-biennal-conference-international-law-1989-2010-performance-appraisal

470.
Ikenberry GJ. The Liberal International Order and its Discontents. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2010 May 1;38(3):509–21.

471.
Koivisto M, Dunne T. Crisis, What Crisis? Liberal Order Building and World Order Conventions. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 2010 May 1;38(3):615–40.

472.
Kumm, Mattias. The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis. The European Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2004;15(5). Available from: http://ejil.org/pdfs/15/5/397.pdf

473.
Lui, Andrew. China Rising, Human Rights and ‘Hard Times’: The Foreign Policy and Network Implications of an Asian Century. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1644365

474.
Meyer LH. Legitimacy, justice and public international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

475.
Jamie Mayerfeld. The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Law. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review [Internet]. 2009;19(1):49–88. Available from: https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/iiclr/article/view/17599/17761

476.
A, Moravcsik. ‘Is there a “democratic deficit” in World Politics? A framework for analysis.’ [Internet]. 2004. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00126.x

477.
NARLIKAR A. India rising: responsible to whom? International Affairs. 2013 May;89(3):595–614.

478.
Petrasek D. Human Rights - The Last Big Thing? Journal of Human Rights Practice. 2011 Mar 1;3(1):105–12.

479.
Raz J. Human Rights in the Emerging World Order. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2009;

480.
Reus-Smit C. Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System. International Organization. 2011 Apr;65(02):207–42.

481.
Rising Powers and the Future of Democracy Promotion: the case of Brazil and India. Third World Quarterly [Internet]. 34(2):339–55. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01436597.2013.775789

482.
Zurn M. Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition. 2004 Apr;39(2):260–87.

483.
Jamie Mayerfeld. The Democratic Legitimacy of International Human Rights Law. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review [Internet]. 2009;19(1):49–88. Available from: https://journals.iupui.edu/index.php/iiclr/article/view/17599/17761

Bibliography for PUBLG063: International Human Rights Standards and Institutions BETA