1
Susskind, Richard E. Chapters 1-5. In: Tomorrow’s lawyers: an introduction to your future. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
2
Carr N. IT doesn’t matter. http://www.roughtype.com/?p=644
3
Goodenough OR. Developing an E-Curriculum: Reflections on the Future of Legal Education and on the Importance of Digital Expertise. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2013. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2255005
4
Levitt, Theodore. MARKETING MYOPIA. The publisher offers limited access to this article The full text cannot be printed or savedMARKETING MYOPIA 1960;38.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=6774995&site=ehost-live
5
Pearce RG, Nasseri S. The virtue of low barriers to becoming a lawyer: promoting liberal and democratic values. International Journal of the Legal Profession 2012;19:357–78. doi:10.1080/09695958.2013.771125
6
Ronald J. Gilson. Value Creation by Business Lawyers: Legal Skills and Asset Pricing. The Yale Law Journal 1984;94:239–313.http://www.jstor.org/stable/796226
7
Neale B, Smart C. ‘Good’ and 'bad’ lawyers? Struggling in the shadow of the new law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 1997;19:377–402. doi:10.1080/09649069708410207
8
Sako M. SASE Annual Meeting 2012, MIT, USA: Professionals between market and hierarchy: a comparative political economy perspective. Socio-Economic Review 2013;11:185–212. doi:10.1093/ser/mws024
9
Boon A. Professionalism under the Legal Services Act 2007. International Journal of the Legal Profession 2010;17:195–232. doi:10.1080/09695958.2011.580561
10
Campbell RW. Rethinking Regulation and Innovation in the U.S. Legal Services Market. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2012. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2018056
11
Hadfield, Gillian K. LEGAL BARRIERS TO INNOVATION: THE GROWING ECONOMIC COST OF PROFESSIONAL CONTROL OVER CORPORATE LEGAL MARKETS. Stanford Law Review;60:1689–732.http://search.proquest.com//docview/224084131
12
Richard Moorhead, Alan Paterson and Avrom Sherr. Contesting Professionalism: Legal Aid and Nonlawyers in England and Wales. Law & Society Review 2003;37:765–808.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1555152
13
MOORHEAD R. Lawyer Specialization-Managing the Professional Paradox. Law & Policy 2010;32:226–59. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00315.x
14
Gillian K. Hadfield. The Price of Law: How the Market for Lawyers Distorts the Justice System. Michigan Law Review 2000;98:953–1006.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1290336
15
Galanter, Marc. THE ELASTIC TOURNAMENT: A SECOND TRANSFORMATION OF THE BIG LAW FIRM. Stanford Law Review;60:1867–929.http://search.proquest.com/docview/224079819/1412B6CF8AC23707616/1?accountid=14511
16
Flood, John A. The Re-Landscaping of the Legal Profession: Large Law Firms and Professional Re-Regulation. SSRN Working Paper Serieshttp://search.proquest.com/docview/749422868/1412B70ADF312E885E3/1?accountid=14511
17
Does Money Really Affect Motivation? A Review of the Research - Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic - Harvard Business Review. http://blogs.hbr.org/2013/04/does-money-really-affect-motiv/
18
Kouchaki M, Smith-Crowe K, Brief AP, et al. Seeing green: Mere exposure to money triggers a business decision frame and unethical outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2013;121:53–61. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.12.002
19
Gwyn Bevan. Has there been supplier-induced demand for legal aid? Civil Justice Quarterly 1996;15:98–114.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IA0E944B1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fshib-idp.ucl.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth
20
Webb D. Killing Time: A Limited Defence of Time-Cost Billing. Legal Ethics 2010;13:39–64. doi:10.5235/146072810791655198
21
Cyrus Tata. In the Interests of Clients or Commerce? Legal Aid, Supply, Demand, and ‘Ethical Indeterminacy’ in Criminal Defence Work. Journal of Law and Society 2007;34:489–519.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20109764
22
Goriely T. Evaluating the Scottish Public Defence Solicitors’ Office. Journal of Law and Society 2003;30:84–101. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00247
23
Fortney SS. Professional Challenges in Large Firm Practices. 2005.http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+billable+hours+derby%253a+empirical+data+on+the+problems+and+pressure...-a0143723886
24
Moorhead R. Filthy lucre: lawyers’ fees and lawyers’ ethics - what is wrong with informed consent? Legal Studies 2011;31:345–71. doi:10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00194.x
25
Susskind, Richard E. Tomorrow’s lawyers: an introduction to your future. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
26
Ribstein LE. The Death of Big Law. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2010. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1467730
27
Clay T S. Law Firms in Transition 2013: An Altman Weil Flash Survey. http://www.altmanweil.com/index.cfm/fa/r.resource_detail/oid/2d831a80-8156-4947-9f0f-1d97eec632a5/resource/Law_Firms_in_Transition_2013_An_Altman_Weil_Flash_Survey.cfm
28
Ribstein LE, Kobayashi BH. Law’s Information Revolution. Law Journal Library Arizona Law Review 2011;53.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/arz53&id=1189&collection=journals&index=journals/arz#1189
29
MacEwen, Bruce, Kalis, Peter J. Growth is dead: now what? : law firms on the brink. New York: : Adam Smith, Esq 2013.
30
Glover S. The Future of Law Practice Will Look a Lot Like its Present. 2013.http://lawyerist.com/the-future-of-law-will-look-a-lot-like-its-present/
31
Clementi D. Review Of The Regulatory Framework For Legal Services In England And Wales Final Report. 2004.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.legal-services-review.org.uk/content/report/index.htm
32
Grout P. The Clementi Report : Potential Risks of External Ownership and Regulatory Responses A Report to the Department of Constitutional Affairs. 2005.http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications/papers/2005/abstract135.html
33
Harry McVea. Legal Disciplinary Practices: Who Needs Them? Journal of Law and Society 2004;31:563–77.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410655
34
Harry McVea. Predators and the Public Interest. The ‘Big Four’ and Multi-Disciplinary Practices. The Modern Law Review 2002;65:811–33.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1097531
35
Kouchaki M. Professionalism and Moral Behavior: Does a Professional Self-Conception Make One More Unethical? SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2013. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2243811
36
Kershaw D, Moorhead R. Consequential Responsibility for Client Wrongs: Lehman Brothers and the Regulation of the Legal Profession. The Modern Law Review 2013;76:26–61. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12001
37
Professor Richard Moorhead. On the Wire. New Law Journal 2012;162:1080–1.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/journalssubmitForm.do
38
Jenoff P. Going Native: Incentive, Identity and the Inherent Ethical Problem of In-House Counsel by Pam Jenoff :: SSRN. SSRN Scholarly Paper Published Online First: 2011.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1868352
39
Langevoort DC. Getting (Too) Comfortable: In-House Lawyers, Enterprise Risk and the Financial Crisis by Donald C. Langevoort :: SSRN. SSRN Scholarly Paper Published Online First: 2011.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1932398
40
Parker C, Rosen R, Nielsen VL. The Two Faces of Lawyers: Professional Ethics and Business Compliance With Regulation by Christine Parker, Robert Rosen, Vibeke Lehmann Nielsen :: SSRN. SSRN Scholarly Paper Published Online First: 2007.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1034561
41
Sako M. Global strategies in the legal services marketplace: institutional impacts on value chain dynamics | Saïd Business School. 2009.http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/ideas-impact/novakdrucecentre/research/working-papers/global-strategies-legal-services-marketplace-institutional-impacts-value-chain-dynamics
42
Sako M. Make-or-buy decisions in legal services: a strategic perspective | Saïd Business School. 2010.http://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/ideas-impact/novakdrucecentre/research/working-papers/make-or-buy-decisions-legal-services-strategic-perspective
43
Mountain DR. Disrupting Conventional Law Firm Business Models using Document Assembly. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 2006;15:170–91. doi:10.1093/ijlit/eal019
44
Darryl Mountain. XML E-Contracts: Documents That Describe Themselves. International Journal of Law and Information Technology;11:274–85. doi:10.1093/ijlit/11.3.274
45
Regan J, Heenan PT. Supply Chains and Porous Boundaries: The Disaggregation of Legal Services. Fordham law review 2010;78:2137–91.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=2137&handle=hein.journals%2Fflr78&collection=journals#2147
46
Bull C. The Legal Process Improvement Toolkit. 2012.http://www.managingpartner.com/sites/default/files/ARK1320%2520-%2520The%2520Legal%2520Process%2520Improvement_Part%2520Report.pdf
47
Granat R. Is Axiom Law a Law Firm? : eLawyering Blog. 2013.http://www.elawyeringredux.com/2013/04/articles/legal-ethics-1/is-axiom-law-a-law-firm/
48
Staudt R. All the Wild Possibilities: Technology that Attacks Barriers to Access to Justice. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 2009;42.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lla42&id=1139&collection=journals&index=journals/lla#1139
49
Staudt R. Chapter 8: Cyberclinics: Law Schools, Technology and Justice. In: Educating the Digital Lawyer.http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/plp/pages/digital_lawyer_book.php
50
Smith R. Can Digital Replace Personal in the Delivery of Legal Aid? A Discussion Paper for the Conference of the International Legal Aid Group. 2013.http://www.ilagnet.org/papers.php
51
Greacen JM, Jones WL. Summit on the Use of Technology to Expand Access to Justice: Analytical Framework. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology :: Annual Symposium Published Online First: 2013.http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/symposium/
52
Kimbro S. Using Technology to Unbundle in the Legal Services Community. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology :: Annual Symposium Published Online First: 2013.http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/symposium/
53
Lauritsen M. A Decision Space for Legal Service Delivery. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology :: Annual Symposium Published Online First: 2013.http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/symposium/
54
Ledray S. Virtual Services Whitepaper. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology :: Annual Symposium Published Online First: 2013.http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/symposium/
55
Zorza R. Preliminary Thoughts on Blue Sky Technology Driven Access and Decision Systems. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology :: Annual Symposium Published Online First: 2013.http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/symposium/
56
Susskind, Richard E. Chapter 9. In: Tomorrow’s lawyers: an introduction to your future. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
57
Dutton WH, Blank G. Next Generation Users: The Internet in Britain. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2011. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1960655
58
Vanilla Research. Understanding Consumer Needs from Legal Information Sources. https://research.legalservicesboard.org.uk/reports-all/
59
Smith R. Can Digital Replace Personal in the Delivery of Legal Aid? A Discussion Paper for the Conference of the International Legal Aid Group. 2013.http://www.ilagnet.org/papers.php
60
Haapio H, Passera S. Visual Law: What Lawyers Need to Learn from Information Designers » VoxPopuLII. 2013.http://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2013/05/15/visual-law-what-lawyers-need-to-learn-from-information-designers/
61
Manzoli S. Taxonomies make the law. Will folksonomies change it? » VoxPopuLII. 2013.http://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2013/04/29/taxonomies-make-the-law-will-folksonomies-change-it/
62
Knake R. Legal Ethics Forum: The Lawyer as Trusted Curator. 2013.http://www.legalethicsforum.com/blog/2013/03/the-lawyer-as-trusted-curator.html
63
Compliance Law Games - Open Law Lab. 2013.http://www.openlawlab.com/2013/03/20/compliance-law-games/
64
James G D, Jennings MM. The Evolution of Unbundling in Litigation Matters: Three Case Studies and a Literature Review by D. James Greiner, Molly M. Jennings :: SSRN. SSRN Scholarly Paper. 2012.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2038616.
65
Greiner DJ, Pattanayak CW, Hennessy JP. The Limits of Unbundled Legal Assistance: A Randomized Study in a Massachusetts District Court and Prospects for the Future. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2012. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1948286
66
Unbundling family legal services - The Law Society. 2013.http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/advice/practice-notes/unbundling-family-legal-services/
67
IFF Research. Understanding the consumer experience of will writing services. http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/how-we-work/consumer-research/summaries/the-consumers-experience-of-will-writing.page
68
Cohen R. 1. Unbundling by Law Firms through Cloud Computing: Responding to Changes in Legal Aid. http://www.ilagnet.org/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/The_Hague_2013/Session_Papers/Session_6_-_Mr_Richard_Cohen.pdf
69
Moore WE. 2. The Future of Legal Aid; Systems. http://www.ilagnet.org/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/The_Hague_2013/Session_Papers/6.2_-_Mr_Wayne_Moore.pdf
70
Zorza R. 3. Review of the Status and Potential of Access to Justice Technology in the United States of America. http://www.ilagnet.org/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/The_Hague_2013/Session_Papers/Session_6_-_Mr_Richard_Zorza.pdf
71
Hough BR. 4. Self Help - How Far Can It Go? 2013.http://www.ilagnet.org/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/filemanager/files/The_Hague_2013/Session_Papers/8.4_-_Bonnie_Hough.pdf
72
Benkler, Yochai. The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: : Yale University Press 2006.
73
Fernández-Barrera, M. Prosumption: shifting the barriers between information producers and consumers. http://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2011/11/17/legal-prosumers-how-can-government-leverage-user-generated-content/
74
Grossman MR, Cormack GV. Technology-assisted Review in E-discovery Can Be More Effective and More Efficient Than Exhaustive Manual Review,. Richmond Journal of Law and Technology 2011;17.http://jolt.richmond.edu/v17i3/article11.pdf
75
Markoff J. Armies of Expensive Lawyers, Replaced by Cheaper Software. The New York Times. 2011.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/nexis/search/homesubmitForm.do
76
Bommarito II MJ, Katz DM. 3 Thoughts on E-Discovery in 2015 and Beyond. 2013.http://computationallegalstudies.com/2013/01/30/3-thoughts-on-e-discovery-in-2015-and-beyond-legaltechnyc-2013-daniel-martin-katz-michael-j-bommarito-ii/
77
PRACTICE DIRECTION 31B – DISCLOSURE OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENTS - Civil Procedure Rules. http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31/pd_part31b
78
Abdel Wahab, Mohamed S., Katsh, M. Ethan, Rainey, Daniel. Online dispute resolution: theory and practice : a treatise on technology and dispute resolution. The Hague: : Eleven International Pub 2012.
79
Ebner N. E-Mediation. In: Online dispute resolution: theory and practice : a treatise on technology and dispute resolution. The Hague: : Eleven International Pub 2012.
80
Katsh E, Wing L. Ten Years of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR): Looking at the Past and Constructing the Future. University of Toledo Law Review 2006;38.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/mungo/enhlexseestat.do?ersKey=23_T18406670505&backKey=20_T18406670533&homeCsi=12162&A=0.3540797164190437&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&&citeString=38%20U.%20Tol.%20L.%20Rev.%2019&countryCode=USA&_md5=00000000000000000000000000000000
81
Larson DA. Artificial Intelligence: Robots, Avatars and the Demise of the Human Mediator by David Allen Larson :: SSRN. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 2010;25.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1461712
82
Larson DA. Technology Mediated Dispute Resolution (TMDR): A New Paradigm for ADR by David Allen Larson :: SSRN. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 2006;21.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=944932##
83
Raines SS, Conley Tyler M. From e-Bay to Eternity: Advances in Online Dispute Resolution. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2006. doi:10.2139/ssrn.955968
84
Tyler MC, McPherson M. Online Dispute Resolution and Family Disputes by Melissa Conley Tyler, Mark McPherson :: SSRN. SSRN Scholarly Paper Published Online First: 2006.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1032743
85
Schultz T. eBay: A Legal System in the Making? by Thomas Schultz :: SSRN. SSRN Scholarly Paper. 2005.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=896679
86
Schultz T. Does Online Dispute Resolution Need Governmental Intervention? The Case for Architectures of Control and Trust by Thomas Schultz :: SSRN. SSRN Scholarly Paper. 2004.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=896532
87
Gramatikov M, Klaming L. Getting Divorced Online: Procedural and Outcome Justice in Online Divorce Mediation. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2011. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1752903
88
ISO Launches PICAS Plus to Automate the Evaluation of Motor Personal Injury Claims. 2009.http://www.targetwire.com/targetwire/2012/01/09/iso204/iso204_uk.html
89
David B. What Data Can’t Do. New York Times. 2013.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/19/opinion/brooks-what-data-cant-do.html?_r=0.&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1382026146-aPRpXf q/ciVLLPO mVLGQ
90
The data deluge. The Economist. 2010.http://www.economist.com/node/15579717?story
91
Data, data everywhere. The Economist. 2013.http://www.economist.com/node/15557443
92
Manyika et al. J. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity | McKinsey & Company. 2011.http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/big_data_the_next_frontier_for_innovation
93
Andreessen, Marc. Why Software Is Eating The World. Wall Street Journal (Online)http://search.proquest.com/docview/885059180/1412CC535484A7CDB38/1?accountid=14511
94
Thompson C. What Is I.B.M.’s Watson? New York Times Magazine. 2010.http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/20/magazine/20Computer-t.html
95
Levy S. The AI Revolution Is On. Wired Magazine. 2010.http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/12/ff_ai_essay_airevolution/
96
Thompson C. The Screens Issue - If You Liked This, Sure to Love That - Winning the Netflix Prize. New York Times Magazine. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/23/magazine/23Netflix-t.html?_r=0
97
Katz DM. Quantitative Legal Prediction – or – How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Start Preparing for the Data Driven Future of the Legal Services Industry. SSRN Scholarly Paper Published Online First: 11 December 2012.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2187752
98
Dysart J. How lawyers are mining the information mother lode for pricing, practice tips and predictions. American Bar Association journal - magazine. 2013.http://www.abajournal.com/magazine/article/the_dawn_of_big_data/
99
Shay L, Hartzog W, Nelson J, et al. We Robot: Do Robots Dream of Electric Laws? An Experiment in Law as Algorithm. 2013.http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/multimedia/we-robot-do-robots-dream-electric-laws-experiment-law-algorithm
100
Theodore W. Ruger, Pauline T. Kim, Andrew D. Martin and Kevin M. Quinn. The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking. Columbia Law Review 2004;104:1150–210.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4099370
101
McConnell R, Ralston D, Simon C. What Computer Models Can—and Can’t—Do. 2013.http://www.law.com/corporatecounsel/PubArticleCC.jsp?id=1202580943312
102
Harbart T. Big Data Meets Big Law. 2012.http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202555605051&Big_Data%20_Meets_BigLaw
103
Hodson H. AI gets involved with the law. New Scientist Published Online First: 17 May 2013.http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21829175.900-ai-gets-involved-with-the-law.html#.UmTqOlv1D6V
104
Manjoo F. Will Robots Steal Your Job: Software Could Kill Lawyers: Why That’s Good for Everyone Else. 2011.http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/robot_invasion/2011/09/will_robots_steal_your_job_5.html
105
Gray J. Welcome to Robot, Android & Automaton LLP. The Globe and Mail. 14AD.http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/the-law-page/welcome-to-robot-android-automaton-llp/article4261559/
106
Ayres I. Prediction Markets vs. Super Crunching: Which Can Better Predict How Justice Kennedy Will Vote? 2009.http://freakonomics.com/2009/12/23/prediction-markets-vs-super-crunching-which-can-better-predict-how-justice-kennedy-will-vote/
107
Katz DM. Netflix Challenge for SCOTUS Prediction? 2010.http://computationallegalstudies.com/2010/01/13/netflix-challenge-for-scotus-prediction/
108
Harbert T. Lex Machina Arms Corporate Leaders and Patent Attorneys with Predictive Analytics. 2012.http://data-informed.com/lex-machina-arms-corporate-leaders-and-patent-attorneys-with-predictive-analytics/
109
Lex Machina | IP litigation data and analytics. https://lexmachina.com/
110
Pullum G. Why Are We Still Waiting for Natural Language Processing? - Lingua Franca. The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2013.http://chronicle.com/blogs/linguafranca/2013/05/09/natural-language-processing/
111
FantasySCOTUS from the Harlan Institute. http://www.fantasyscotus.net/
112
Guthrie CF. Smart Technology and the Moral Life. Ethics & Behavior 2013;23:324–37. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.787359
113
Gillers S. A Profession, If You Can Keep It: How Information Technology and Fading Borders are Reshaping the Law Marketplace and What We Should Do About It. SSRN Scholarly Paper Published Online First: 19 March 2012.http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2026052.
114
Swede J. Professional negligence law needs to catch up. 15AD.http://www.darlingtons.com/blog/professional-negligence-law-needs-to-catch-up/
115
Hwang T. The Laws of (Legal) Robotics: Automatons, APIs, and the ABA. 2013.http://www.robotandhwang.com/2013/06/the-laws-of-legal-robotics/
116
Lauritsen M. Are we free to code the law? Communications of the ACM 2013;56. doi:10.1145/2492007.2492025
