[1]
A, H. 1981. Abbott of Lilleshull v William of Harecourt. The Roll of the Shropshire Eyre of 1256. Selden Society. 44–46.
[2]
Adrian Johns 1998. John Streater and the knights of the galaxy. The nature of the book: print and knowledge in the making. University of Chicago Press. 266–323.
[3]
Baker, J. 2012. Deeds speak louder than words : covenants and the law of proof, 1290-1321. Laws, lawyers, and texts : studies in medieval legal history in honour of Paul Brand. Brill. 177–199.
[4]
Baker, J. H. 1977. Introduction from the Reports of John Spelman. The reports of Sir John Spelman. Selden Society. 192-203 (plus page 140).
[5]
Baker, J. H. 2000. The inns of court and legal doctrine. The common law tradition: lawyers, books, and the law. Hambledon Press. 37–51.
[6]
Baker, J. H. 1977. The use upon a use in equity 1558-1625. The Law quarterly review. 93, (1977), 33–38.
[7]
Baker, J.H. 1986. Criminal Courts and Procedure, 1550-1800. The legal profession and the common law: historical essays. Hambledon. 259–301.
[8]
Baker, J.H. 1981. Origins of the ‘doctrine’ of consideration, 1535-1585. On the laws and customs of England: essays in honor of Samuel E. Thorne. University of North Carolina Press. 336–358.
[9]
Baker, J.H. 1981. Origins of the ‘doctrine’ of consideration, 1535-1585. On the laws and customs of England : essays in honor of Samuel E. Thorne. M.S. Arnold, ed. University of North Carolina Press. 336–358.
[10]
Baker, J.H. 1995. Personal Liberty under the common law of England, 1200-1600. The origins of modern freedom in the West. Stanford University Press. 178–202.
[11]
Baker, J.H. 1969. The common lawyers and the Chancery : 1616. Irish jurist. 4, (1969), 368–392.
[12]
Barton, J.L. 1983. Remedies for chattels. Law, litigants and the legal profession. Royal Historical Society. 30–38.
[13]
Barton, J.L. 1976. The rise of the fee simple. Law quarterly review. 92, (1976), 108–121.
[14]
Biancalana, J. 1998. Medieval uses. Itinera fiduciae: trust and Treuhand in historical perspective. Duncker & Humblot. 111–152.
[15]
Biancalana, J. 1998. Medieval uses. Itinera fiduciae : trust and Treuhand in historical perspective. R. Helmholz and R. Zimmermann, eds. Duncker & Humblot. 111–152.
[16]
Birks, P. 2001. Negligence in the eighteenth century common law. Negligence: the comparative legal history of the law of torts. Duncker & Humblot. 173–227.
[17]
Birks, Peter 2001. Negligence in the eighteenth century common law. Negligence : the comparative legal history of the law of torts. Duncker & Humblot. 173–227.
[18]
Blatcher, Marjorie 1961. Touching the writ of Latitat: an act ‘of no great moment’. Elizabethan government and society: essays presented to Sir John Neale. University of London, the Athlone Press. 188–212.
[19]
Brand, P. 2013. Chancery, the justices and the making of new writs in thirteenth century England. Law and legal process: substantive law and procedure in English legal history. Cambridge University Press. 17–33.
[20]
Brand, P. 1992. The origins of English land law: Milsom and after. The making of the common law. Hambledon. 203–225.
[21]
Brand, Paul 1992. Creating a demand for lawyers: the transformation of the English court system, 1154-1307. The origins of the English legal profession. Blackwell. 14–32.
[22]
Brand, Paul 1975. Formedon in the remainder before ‘De Donis’. Irish jurist. 10, (1975), 318–323.
[23]
Brooks, C.W. 1998. Litigation and society in England, 1200-1996. Lawyers, litigation, and English society since 1450. Hambledon Press. 63–128.
[24]
Brooks, C.W. 2008. The absoluta potestas of a sovereign and the liberty of the subject: law and political controversy in the 1620s. Law, politics and society in early modern England. Cambridge University Press. 169; 180–177 ; 185.
[25]
Brooks, C.W. 2008. The politics of jurisdiction II: multiple kingdoms and questions about royal authority. Law, politics and society in early modern England. Cambridge University Press. 142–152.
[26]
Bryson, W. Hamilton 1982. The court of Exchequer comes of age. Tudor rule and revolution: essays for G.R. Elton and his American friends. Cambridge University Press. 149–158.
[27]
Clanchy, M. T., editor 1978. Highway robbery and trial by battle in the Hampshire eyre of 1249. Medieval legal records: edited in memory of C. A. F. Meekings. H.M. Stationery Off. 26–61.
[28]
Clanchy, M.T. 1985. Magna Carta and the common pleas. Studies in medieval history presented to R. H. C. Davis. Hambledon. 219–232.
[29]
Gordley, J. 1991. The Anglo-American reception. The philosophical origins of modern contract doctrine. Clarendon Press. 134–160.
[30]
Gray, Charles M. 1963. The Elizabethan courts and the common law of copyhold. Copyhold, equity, and the common law. Harvard University Press. 93–146.
[31]
Green, Judith A. 1986. The lion of justice. The government of England under Henry I. Cambridge University Press. 95–117.
[32]
Groot, R.D. 1988. The Early-Thirteen-Century Criminal Jury. Twelve good men and true: the criminal trial jury in England, 1200-1800. Princeton University Press. 3–35.
[33]
Halliday, P. 2010. Habeas corpus: from England to empire (extracts). Habeas corpus: from England to empire. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 11; 39 ; 153–13 ; 53 ; 160.
[34]
Harding, Alan 1975. Plaints and bills in the history of english law, mainly in the period 1250-1350. Legal history studies 1972: papers presented to the Legal History Conference, Aberystwyth, 18-21 July 1972. University of Wales Press. 65–86.
[35]
Helmholz, R. H. 1987. Damages in actions for slander at common law. The Law Quarterly Review. 103, (1987), 624–638.
[36]
Helmholz, R.H. 1987. Assumpsit and fidei laesio. Canon law and the law of England. Hambledon. 263–289.
[37]
Helmholz, R.H. 1985. Introduction. Select cases on defamation to 1600. Selden Society. xxvi–xlvii.
[38]
Holdsworth, W.S. 1924. Appendix I : The opinion given by the judges in 1591 as to imprisonments by order of the council. A history of English law: Vol.5. Methuen. 495–497.
[39]
Holdsworth, W.S. 1924. Defamation in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Part 2. The law quarterly review. 40, 4 (1924).
[40]
Hudson, J. 1986. Anglo-Norman land law and the origins of property. The government of England under Henry I. Cambridge University Press. 198–222.
[41]
Ibbetson, D. Legal printing and legal doctrine. Irish jurist. 35, 345–354.
[42]
Ibbetson, D.J. 2001. Common law and ius commune. Common law and ‘ius commune’: Selden Society lecture delivered in the Old Hall of Lincoln’s Inn July 20th, 2000. Selden Society.
[43]
Ibbetson, D.J. 1990. Consideration and the theory of contract in sixteenth century common law. Towards a general law of contract. Duncker & Humblot. 67–123.
[44]
Ibbetson, D.J. 1990. Consideration and the theory of contract in sixteenth century common law. Towards a general law of contract. Duncker & Humblot. 67–123.
[45]
Ibbetson, D.J. and Swain, W. 2008. Third party beneficiaries in English law : from Dutton v. Poole to Tweddle v. Atkinson. Ius quaesitum tertio. Duncker & Humblot. 191–213.
[46]
Jim Evans 1987. Change in the doctrine of precedent during the nineteenth century. Precedent in law. Clarendon Press. 35–72.
[47]
Jones, N. G. 1997. The influence of revenue considerations upon the remedial practice of chancery in trust cases, 1536-1660. Communities and courts in Britain, 1150-1900. Hambledon Press. 99–113.
[48]
L.A, K. 1977. Les Enfants Terribles: Coke, Ellesmere, and the Supremacy of the Chancellor’s Decree. Law and politics in Jacobean England / [by Louis A. Knafla]. The tracts of Lord Chancellor Ellesmere / [edited by] Louis A. Knafla. Cambridge University Press. 155–181.
[49]
Lobban, M. 2010. Introduction. The Oxford history of the laws of England: Vol. 11, 12, 13: 1820-1914. Oxford University Press. 297–328.
[50]
Lobban, M. 2002. The strange life of the English civil jury, 1837-1914. ‘The dearest birth right of the people of England’: the jury in the history of the common law. Hart. 173–215.
[51]
Macqueen, H. L. 1993. Introduction. Common law and feudal society in medieval Scotland. (1993), 1–32.
[52]
Milsom, S.F.C. 1976. Disciplinary jurisdiction. The legal framework of English feudalism. Cambridge University Press. 1–35.
[53]
Milsom, S.F.C. 1956. Formedon before De Donis. Law quarterly review. 72, (1956), 391–397.
[54]
Milsom, S.F.C. 1968. Introduction . The history of English law before the time of Edward I. University Press. xxiii–lxxiii.
[55]
Milsom, S.F.C. 1961. Sale of goods in the fifteenth century. Law quarterly review. 77, (1961), 257–284.
[56]
Milsom, S.F.C. 1985. Trespass from Henry III to Edward III. Studies in the history of the common law. Hambledon. 1–90.
[57]
Mirow, M.C. 1999. The Ascent of the Readings: some evidence from readings on wills. Learning the law: teaching and the transmission of law in England, 1150-1900. Hambledon Press. 227–254.
[58]
Mitchell, P. 2005. Qualified Privilege. The making of the modern law of defamation. Hart. 145–167.
[59]
P, B. 1978. The Control of mortmain alienation in England, 1200-1300. Legal records and the historian: papers presented to the Cambridge Legal History Conference, 7-10 July, 1975, and in Lincoln’s Inn Old Hall on 3 July 1974. Royal Historical Society. 29–40.
[60]
P, T. 2007. Interchange and Exchange between the City and the Common Law. Law courts and lawyers in the city of London 1300-1550. Cambridge University Press. 350–372.
[61]
Plucknett and Barton 1974. Introduction to St German’s Doctor and Student. Doctor and student. Selden Society. xi–lxvii.
[62]
Prest, Wilfrid 1993. Law reform in eighteenth-century England. The life of the law: proceedings of the tenth British Legal History Conference, Oxford, 1991. Hambledon Press. 113–123.
[63]
Prichard, M.J. 1976. Scott v. Shepherd (1773) and the emergence of the tort of negligence. Scott v. Shepherd (1773) and the emergence of the tort of negligence. Selden Society. 3–33.
[64]
Simpson, A. W. B. 1975. Innovation in nineteenth century contract law. The Law quarterly review. 91, (1975), 247–278.
[65]
Simpson, A.W.B. 1995. Politics and law in Elizabethan England: Shelley’s case (1581). Leading cases in the common law. Clarendon. 13–44.
[66]
Simpson, A.W.B. 1966. The penal bond with conditional defeasance. Law quarterly review. 82, (1966), 392–422.
[67]
Swain, W. 2007. The will theory of contract in the nineteenth century: its influence and its limitations. Law in the city: proceedings of the seventeenth British Legal History Conference, London, 2005. Four Courts Press. 163–180.
[68]
van Caenegem, R. C. 1988. Royal writs and writ procedure. The birth of the English common law. Cambridge University Press. 29–61.
[69]
Warren Swain 2015. Classical Contract Law and its limits. The law of contract 1670-1870. Cambridge University Press. 201–230.
[70]
Williams, I. 2012. Early-modern judges and the practice of precedent. Judges and judging in the history of the common law and civil law: from antiquity to modern times. Cambridge University Press. 51–66.