[1]
H. A, ‘Abbott of Lilleshull v William of Harecourt’, in The Roll of the Shropshire Eyre of 1256, vol. Publications of the Selden Society, London: Selden Society, 1981, pp. 44–46 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=562b517c-0c6b-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[2]
Baker, J.H., ‘The common lawyers and the Chancery : 1616’, Irish jurist, vol. 4, pp. 368–392, 1969.
[3]
J. H. Baker, ‘Criminal Courts and Procedure, 1550-1800’, in The legal profession and the common law: historical essays, vol. History series, London: Hambledon, 1986, pp. 259–301.
[4]
Baker, J. H., ‘The inns of court and legal doctrine’, in The common law tradition: lawyers, books, and the law, London: Hambledon Press, 2000, pp. 37–51.
[5]
Baker, J. H., ‘Introduction from the Reports of John Spelman’, in The reports of Sir John Spelman, vol. Publications of the Selden Society, London: Selden Society, 1977, pp. 192-203 (plus page 140) [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d0abaf91-2773-ee11-826a-0050f2f0d45d
[6]
J. H. Baker, ‘Origins of the “doctrine” of consideration, 1535-1585’, in On the laws and customs of England: essays in honor of Samuel E. Thorne, vol. Studies in legal history, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981, pp. 336–358.
[7]
J. H. Baker, ‘Origins of the “doctrine” of consideration, 1535-1585’, in On the laws and customs of England : essays in honor of Samuel E. Thorne, M. S. Arnold, Ed. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1981, pp. 336–358.
[8]
J. H. Baker, ‘Personal Liberty under the common law of England, 1200-1600’, in The origins of modern freedom in the West, vol. The making of modern freedom, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 178–202.
[9]
J. Baker, ‘Deeds speak louder than words : covenants and the law of proof, 1290-1321’, in Laws, lawyers, and texts : studies in medieval legal history in honour of Paul Brand, vol. Medieval law and its practice; v. 13, Leiden: Brill, 2012, pp. 177–199 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=87ea9fac-9436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[10]
Baker, J. H., ‘The use upon a use in equity 1558-1625’, The Law quarterly review, vol. 93, pp. 33–38, 1977.
[11]
Barton, J.L., ‘Remedies for chattels’, in Law, litigants and the legal profession, vol. Royal Historical Society studies in history series, London: Royal Historical Society, 1983, pp. 30–38.
[12]
Barton, J.L., ‘The rise of the fee simple’, Law quarterly review, vol. 92, pp. 108–121, 1976.
[13]
J. Biancalana, ‘Medieval uses’, in Itinera fiduciae: trust and Treuhand in historical perspective, vol. Comparative studies in continental and Anglo-American legal history =, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998, pp. 111–152 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e1820c2e-fe6c-ee11-826a-0050f2f06092
[14]
J. Biancalana, ‘Medieval uses’, in Itinera fiduciae : trust and Treuhand in historical perspective, R. Helmholz and R. Zimmermann, Eds. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1998, pp. 111–152 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e1820c2e-fe6c-ee11-826a-0050f2f06092
[15]
P. Birks, ‘Negligence in the eighteenth century common law’, in Negligence: the comparative legal history of the law of torts, vol. Comparative studies in continental and Anglo-American legal history =, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2001, pp. 173–227.
[16]
Birks, Peter, ‘Negligence in the eighteenth century common law’, in Negligence : the comparative legal history of the law of torts, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2001, pp. 173–227.
[17]
Blatcher, Marjorie, ‘Touching the writ of Latitat: an act “of no great moment”’, in Elizabethan government and society: essays presented to Sir John Neale, London: University of London, the Athlone Press, 1961, pp. 188–212.
[18]
B. P, ‘The Control of mortmain alienation in England, 1200-1300’, in Legal records and the historian: papers presented to the Cambridge Legal History Conference, 7-10 July, 1975, and in Lincoln’s Inn Old Hall on 3 July 1974, vol. Studies in history, London: Royal Historical Society, 1978, pp. 29–40.
[19]
Brand, Paul, ‘Creating a demand for lawyers: the transformation of the English court system, 1154-1307’, in The origins of the English legal profession, Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell, 1992, pp. 14–32.
[20]
Brand, Paul, ‘Formedon in the remainder before “De Donis”’, Irish jurist, vol. 10, pp. 318–323, 1975.
[21]
Brand, P., ‘The origins of English land law: Milsom and after’, in The making of the common law, London: Hambledon, 1992, pp. 203–225.
[22]
P. Brand, ‘Chancery, the justices and the making of new writs in thirteenth century England’, in Law and legal process: substantive law and procedure in English legal history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 17–33 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3a812ab5-7836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[23]
C. W. Brooks, ‘The politics of jurisdiction II: multiple kingdoms and questions about royal authority’, in Law, politics and society in early modern England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 142–152 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=996a0e12-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[24]
C. W. Brooks, ‘The absoluta potestas of a sovereign and the liberty of the subject: law and political controversy in the 1620s’, in Law, politics and society in early modern England, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 169; 180–177 ; 185.
[25]
Brooks, C.W., ‘Litigation and society in England, 1200-1996’, in Lawyers, litigation, and English society since 1450, London: Hambledon Press, 1998, pp. 63–128.
[26]
Bryson, W. Hamilton, ‘The court of Exchequer comes of age’, in Tudor rule and revolution: essays for G.R. Elton and his American friends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 149–158.
[27]
van Caenegem, R. C., ‘Royal writs and writ procedure’, in The birth of the English common law, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 29–61.
[28]
Clanchy, M. T., editor, ‘Highway robbery and trial by battle in the Hampshire eyre of 1249’, in Medieval legal records: edited in memory of C. A. F. Meekings, London: H.M. Stationery Off, 1978, pp. 26–61.
[29]
Clanchy, M.T., ‘Magna Carta and the common pleas’, in Studies in medieval history presented to R. H. C. Davis, London: Hambledon, 1985, pp. 219–232.
[30]
Jim Evans, ‘Change in the doctrine of precedent during the nineteenth century’, in Precedent in law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987, pp. 35–72 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=db7b0df3-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[31]
Gordley, J., ‘The Anglo-American reception’, in The philosophical origins of modern contract doctrine, vol. Clarendon law series, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, pp. 134–160.
[32]
Gray, Charles M., ‘The Elizabethan courts and the common law of copyhold’, in Copyhold, equity, and the common law, vol. Harvard historical monographs, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963, pp. 93–146.
[33]
Green, Judith A., ‘The lion of justice’, in The government of England under Henry I, vol. Cambridge studies in medieval life and thought ; Fourth series, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 95–117.
[34]
R. D. Groot, ‘The Early-Thirteen-Century Criminal Jury’, in Twelve good men and true: the criminal trial jury in England, 1200-1800, Guildford: Princeton University Press, 1988, pp. 3–35.
[35]
P. Halliday, ‘Habeas corpus: from England to empire (extracts)’, in Habeas corpus: from England to empire, Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010, pp. 11; 39 ; 153–13 ; 53 ; 160.
[36]
Harding, Alan, ‘Plaints and bills in the history of english law, mainly in the period 1250-1350’, in Legal history studies 1972: papers presented to the Legal History Conference, Aberystwyth, 18-21 July 1972, Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1975, pp. 65–86.
[37]
Helmholz, R.H., ‘Assumpsit and fidei laesio’, in Canon law and the law of England, vol. [History series], London: Hambledon, 1987, pp. 263–289.
[38]
Helmholz, R. H., ‘Damages in actions for slander at common law’, The Law Quarterly Review, vol. 103, pp. 624–638, 1987.
[39]
R. H. Helmholz, ‘Introduction’, in Select cases on defamation to 1600, vol. Publications of the Selden Society, London: Selden Society, 1985, pp. xxvi–xlvii [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d6f356ff-206f-ee11-826a-0050f2f06092
[40]
W. S. Holdsworth, ‘Appendix I : The opinion given by the judges in 1591 as to imprisonments by order of the council’, in A history of English law: Vol.5, Methuen, 1924, pp. 495–497.
[41]
W. S. Holdsworth, ‘Defamation in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Part 2’, The law quarterly review, vol. 40, no. 4, 1924.
[42]
Hudson, J., ‘Anglo-Norman land law and the origins of property’, in The government of England under Henry I, vol. Cambridge studies in medieval life and thought ; Fourth series, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986, pp. 198–222.
[43]
Ibbetson, D.J., ‘Common law and ius commune’, in Common law and ‘ius commune’: Selden Society lecture delivered in the Old Hall of Lincoln’s Inn July 20th, 2000, London: Selden Society, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4fbbee48-0b6b-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[44]
D. J. Ibbetson, ‘Consideration and the theory of contract in sixteenth century common law’, in Towards a general law of contract, vol. Comparative studies in continental and Anglo-American legal history, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1990, pp. 67–123.
[45]
D. J. Ibbetson, ‘Consideration and the theory of contract in sixteenth century common law’, in Towards a general law of contract, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1990, pp. 67–123.
[46]
Ibbetson, D., ‘Legal printing and legal doctrine’, Irish jurist, vol. 35, pp. 345–354.
[47]
D. J. Ibbetson and W. Swain, ‘Third party beneficiaries in English law : from Dutton v. Poole to Tweddle v. Atkinson’, in Ius quaesitum tertio, vol. Comparative studies in continental and Anglo-American legal history =, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2008, pp. 191–213.
[48]
Adrian Johns, ‘John Streater and the knights of the galaxy’, in The nature of the book: print and knowledge in the making, University of Chicago Press, 1998, pp. 266–323 [Online]. Available: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=acls;cc=acls;rgn=full%20text;idno=heb01007.0001.001;didno=heb01007.0001.001;view=image;seq=00000290;node=heb01007.0001.001%3A8
[49]
Jones, N. G., ‘The influence of revenue considerations upon the remedial practice of chancery in trust cases, 1536-1660’, in Communities and courts in Britain, 1150-1900, London: Hambledon Press, 1997, pp. 99–113.
[50]
K. L.A, ‘Les Enfants Terribles: Coke, Ellesmere, and the Supremacy of the Chancellor’s Decree’, in Law and politics in Jacobean England / [by Louis A. Knafla]. The tracts of Lord Chancellor Ellesmere / [edited by] Louis A. Knafla, vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977, pp. 155–181.
[51]
M. Lobban, ‘Introduction’, in The Oxford history of the laws of England: Vol. 11, 12, 13: 1820-1914, vol. Oxford history of the laws of England, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, pp. 297–328.
[52]
M. Lobban, ‘The strange life of the English civil jury, 1837-1914’, in ‘The dearest birth right of the people of England’: the jury in the history of the common law, Oxford: Hart, 2002, pp. 173–215.
[53]
Macqueen, H. L., ‘Introduction’, Common law and feudal society in medieval Scotland, pp. 1–32, 1993.
[54]
Milsom, S.F.C., ‘Disciplinary jurisdiction’, in The legal framework of English feudalism, vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp. 1–35.
[55]
Milsom, S.F.C., ‘Formedon before De Donis’, Law quarterly review, vol. 72, pp. 391–397, 1956.
[56]
Milsom, S.F.C., ‘Introduction ’, in The history of English law before the time of Edward I, 2d. ed., Cambridge: University Press, 1968, pp. xxiii–lxxiii.
[57]
Milsom, S.F.C., ‘Sale of goods in the fifteenth century’, Law quarterly review, vol. 77, pp. 257–284, 1961.
[58]
Milsom, S.F.C., ‘Trespass from Henry III to Edward III’, in Studies in the history of the common law, vol. [History series], London: Hambledon, 1985, pp. 1–90.
[59]
M. C. Mirow, ‘The Ascent of the Readings: some evidence from readings on wills’, in Learning the law: teaching and the transmission of law in England, 1150-1900, London: Hambledon Press, 1999, pp. 227–254.
[60]
P. Mitchell, ‘Qualified Privilege’, in The making of the modern law of defamation, Oxford: Hart, 2005, pp. 145–167.
[61]
Plucknett and Barton, ‘Introduction to St German’s Doctor and Student’, in Doctor and student, vol. Selden Society. Publications, London: Selden Society, 1974, pp. xi–lxvii.
[62]
Prest, Wilfrid, ‘Law reform in eighteenth-century England’, in The life of the law: proceedings of the tenth British Legal History Conference, Oxford, 1991, London: Hambledon Press, 1993, pp. 113–123.
[63]
M. J. Prichard, ‘Scott v. Shepherd (1773) and the emergence of the tort of negligence’, in Scott v. Shepherd (1773) and the emergence of the tort of negligence, London: Selden Society, 1976, pp. 3–33.
[64]
Simpson, A. W. B., ‘Innovation in nineteenth century contract law’, The Law quarterly review, vol. 91, pp. 247–278, 1975.
[65]
Simpson, A.W.B., ‘The penal bond with conditional defeasance’, Law quarterly review, vol. 82, pp. 392–422, 1966.
[66]
Simpson, A.W.B., ‘Politics and law in Elizabethan England: Shelley’s case (1581)’, in Leading cases in the common law, Oxford: Clarendon, 1995, pp. 13–44.
[67]
Swain, W., ‘The will theory of contract in the nineteenth century: its influence and its limitations’, in Law in the city: proceedings of the seventeenth British Legal History Conference, London, 2005, Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2007, pp. 163–180.
[68]
Warren Swain, ‘Classical Contract Law and its limits’, in The law of contract 1670-1870, vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 201–230 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4acad8bc-7836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[69]
T. P, ‘Interchange and Exchange between the City and the Common Law’, in Law courts and lawyers in the city of London 1300-1550, vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 350–372.
[70]
I. Williams, ‘Early-modern judges and the practice of precedent’, in Judges and judging in the history of the common law and civil law: from antiquity to modern times, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 51–66.