[1]
V. Buchli, The material culture reader. Oxford: Berg, 2002.
[2]
C. Y. Tilley, Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE, 2006. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
[3]
M. Rowlands, ‘A materialist approach to materiality’, in Materiality, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 72–87. Available: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://read.dukeupress.edu/content/materiality
[4]
J-P. Warnier, ‘A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–24, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1177/135918350100600101
[5]
C. Tilley, ‘Ethnography and Material Culture’, in Handbook of ethnography, London: SAGE, 2001, pp. 258–272. Available: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/handbook-of-ethnography/SAGE.xml
[6]
William Roseberry, ‘Marx and Anthropology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 26, pp. 25–46, 1997, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952513
[7]
C. Y. Tilley, ‘Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives’, in A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments, Oxford: Berg, 1994, pp. 7–34. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d31d0aaf-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[8]
D. Abram, ‘Philosophy on the way to ecology: a technical introduction to the inquiry’, in The spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world, New York: Vintage Books, 1996, pp. 31–72.
[9]
C. Helliwell, ‘Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse’, in Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 128–148. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7bdefea9-46b3-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[10]
P. C. Adams, S. D. Hoelscher, and K. E. Till, Textures of place: exploring humanist geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttg77
[11]
E. S. Casey, ‘How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena’, in Senses of place, Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 1996, pp. 13–52.
[12]
E. S. Casey, Getting back into place: toward a renewed understanding of the place-world, 2nd ed., vol. Studies in Continental thought. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press, 2009.
[13]
M. Csáky, How does it feel? Exploring the world of your senses. London: Thames and Hudson, 1979.
[14]
J. Thomas, Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge, 1996.
[15]
G. Weiss and H. F. Haber, Perspectives on embodiment: the intersections of nature and culture. London: Routledge, 1999. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203905258
[16]
M. Hammond, J. Howarth, and R. Keat, Understanding phenomenology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
[17]
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of perception, vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge, 2012.
[18]
G. B. Madison, The phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty: a search for the limits of consciousness, vol. Series in Continental thought. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1981.
[19]
J. F. Weiner, Tree leaf talk: a Heideggerian anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[20]
D. Sperber, ‘Claude Levi-Strauss’, in Structuralism and since: from Lévi-Strauss to Derrida, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–51.
[21]
J. Sturrock, ‘Social Sciences’, in Structuralism, 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2003, pp. 48–73.
[22]
J. Derrida, ‘Writing and Man’s Exploitation by Man’, in Of grammatology, Corrected ed.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, pp. 118–140.
[23]
R. C. Morris, ‘Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 355–389, Sept. 2007, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357
[24]
Claire, Jacobson, and Brooke, Grundfest, Schoepf, ‘Split representation in the Art of Asia and America’, in Structural anthropology, [New York]: Basic Books, 1963, pp. 245–266. Available: https://soth.alexanderstreet.com/cgi-bin/SOTH/hub.py?type=getdoc&docid=S10021413-D000014
[25]
Claude Lévi-Strauss, ‘The Salish Swaihwe’, in The way of the masks, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1982, pp. 15–39.
[26]
Christopher, Tilley, ‘Claude Levi Strauss: structuralism and beyond’, in Reading material culture: structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990, pp. 3–80.
[27]
P. Brunette, ‘Open City (1945)’, in Roberto Rossellini, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, pp. 41–60.
[28]
Peter Brunette and David Wills, ‘The Frame of the Frame’, in Screen/play: Derrida and film theory, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989, pp. 99–138. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zthjb.7
[29]
Christopher Norris, ‘De Man and the Critique of Romantic Ideology’, in Paul de Man: deconstruction and the critique of aesthetic ideology, London: Routledge, 1988, pp. 28–64.
[30]
Peter Brunette and David Wills, ‘Introduction: The spatial arts : an interview with Jacques Derrida’, in Deconstruction and the visual arts: art, media, architecture, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[31]
P. Fortis, ‘The birth of design: a Kuna theory of body and personhood’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 480–495, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01635.x
[32]
A. Gell, ‘The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology’, in The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams, Oxford: Berg, 2006, pp. 159–186.
[33]
Tim Ingold, ‘Of string bags and bird’s nests. Skill and the construction of artefacts.’, in The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 349–361.
[34]
A. Gell and Kokuritsu Minzokugaku Hakubutsukan, ‘Time and social anthropology’, Senri Ethnological Studies, vol. 45, 1998.
[35]
British Academy, ‘Proceedings of the British Academy’, pp. 123–147.
[36]
A. Gell, Metamorphosis of the cassowaries: Umeda society, language and ritual, vol. London School of Economics monographs on social anthropology. London: Athlone Press, 1975.
[37]
A. Gell, The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images, vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1992.
[38]
A. Gell, Wrapping in images: tattooing in Polynesia, vol. Oxford studies in the anthropology of cultural forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
[39]
A. Gell, Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[40]
A. Gell and E. Hirsch, The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams, vol. London School of Economics monographs on social anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 2006.
[41]
C. Pinney and N. Thomas, Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[42]
Carl Knappett, ‘Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 97–117, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1359183502007001307
[43]
M. Rampley, ‘Art history and cultural difference: Alfred Gell’s anthropology of art’, Art History, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 524–551, Sept. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.2005.00475.x
[44]
H. Morphy, ‘Art as a Mode of Action: Some Problems with Gell’s Art and Agency’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5–27, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1359183508100006
[45]
Tim Ingold, Lines: a brief history. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.
[46]
T. Ingold, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge, 2000.
[47]
T. Ingold, Evolution and social life, vol. Themes in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[48]
Tim Ingold, ‘Making culture and weaving the world: Artefacts and organisms’, in Matter, materiality and modern culture, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 50–71. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203351635/startPage/63/1
[49]
Arjun Appadurai, ‘Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy’, in Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization, London: University of Minnesota Press, 1996, pp. 27–44.
[50]
M. Taussig, ‘Redeeming Indigo’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1–15, May 2008, doi: 10.1177/0263276408090655
[51]
J. McC. Heyman and H. Campbell, ‘The anthropology of global flows: A critical reading of Appadurai’s `Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 131–148, June 2009, doi: 10.1177/1463499609105474
[52]
M. Jay, ‘Unsympathetic Magic:Nervous System’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 79–82, Sept. 1993, doi: 10.1525/var.1993.9.2.79
[53]
M. Taussig, ‘Michael Taussig Replies to Martin Jay’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 154–154, Mar. 1994, doi: 10.1525/var.1994.10.1.154
[54]
M. Jay, ‘Martin Jay Replies to Michael Taussig and Paul Stoller’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 163–164, Mar. 1994, doi: 10.1525/var.1994.10.1.163
[55]
M. T. Taussig, Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. New York: Routledge, 1993.
[56]
M. T. Taussig, Beauty and the beast. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226789880
[57]
J. L. Hevia, ‘History, Theory, and Colonial Power: The Critical Method of Michael Taussig in Shamanism, Colonialism, and The Wild Man’, Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 104–125, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1992.tb00025.x
[58]
P. Bourdieu, Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1433990
[59]
J. Wypijewski, V. Komar, and A. Melamid, Painting by numbers: Komar and Melamid’s scientific guide to art. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1997.
[60]
S. Binkley, ‘Kitsch as a Repetitive System: A Problem for the Theory of Taste Hierarchy’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 131–152, July 2000, doi: 10.1177/135918350000500201
[61]
Susan Orlean, ‘Art for Everybody’, 2001, Available: http://www.susanorlean.com/articles/art_for_everybody.php
[62]
A. L. Boylan, Thomas Kinkade: the artist in the mall. Durham [NC]: Duke University Press, 2011. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822393399
[63]
P. Fortis, Kuna art and Shamanism: an ethnographic approach. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press, 2012. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=497088&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[64]
L. Bessire and D. Bond, ‘Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique’, American Ethnologist, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 440–456, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1111/amet.12083
[65]
S. Campbell, ‘The Captivating Agency of Art: many Ways of Seeing’, in Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment, Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[66]
A. Forge, ‘Style and Meaning in Sepik Art’, in Primitive art & society, London: Oxford University Press for the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, 1973.
[67]
A. Gell, ‘Style and culture (Chapter 8)’, in Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[68]
M. Holbraad, M. A. Pedersen, and E. Viveiros de Castro, ‘The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions’, Cultural anthropology journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology, Available: http://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
[69]
C. Lévi-Strauss, ‘Split representation in the Art of Asia and America’, in The anthropology of art: a reader, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2006.
[70]
D. Losche, ‘THE SEPIK GAZE: Iconographic Interpretation of Abelam Form’, Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, no. 38, pp. 47–60, 1995, Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23171708?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[71]
E. Viveiros de Castro, ‘Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation’, Tipití - Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2004, Available: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=tipiti
[72]
N. D. Schüll, Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400834655
[73]
V. Buchli, ‘Architecture and the domestic sphere’, in The material culture reader, Oxford: Berg, 2002, pp. 207–213.
[74]
P. Bourdieu, ‘The Berber house or the world reversed’, Social Science Information, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151–170, 1970, doi: 10.1177/053901847000900213
[75]
P. Garvey, ‘Organized Disorder: Moving furniture in Norwegian Homes’, in Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors, D. Miller, Ed., Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 47–68. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e0b9b145-45db-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[76]
W. Benjamin and R. Tiedemann, The arcades project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 2002.
[77]
S. Reimer and D. Leslie, ‘Identity, Consumption, and the Home’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 187–208, July 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053536
[78]
V. Buchli and G. Lucas, ‘“The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth century British council house”’, in Archaeologies of the contemporary past, London: Routledge, 2001.
[79]
S. Chevalier, ‘“From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb”’, in Material cultures: why some things matter, London: University College London Press, 1997.
[80]
D. Miller, ‘Appropriating the state on the council estate’, Man, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 353–372, 1988, doi: 10.2307/2802810
[81]
J. Carsten, ‘Houses of Memory and Kinship’, in After Kinship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 31–56. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800382
[82]
I. Cieraad, At home: an anthropology of domestic space, vol. Space, place, and society. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1999.
[83]
C. Humphrey, ‘Inside a Mongolian tent’, New society, vol. 30, no. 630, pp. 273–275, 1974.
[84]
S. M. Low and D. Lawrence-Zúñiga, The anthropology of space and place: locating culture, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2003.
[85]
P. Rivière, ‘Houses, places and people: community and continuity in Guiana’, in About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 189–205. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
[86]
A. Gell, ‘“9.6 The Maori meeting house”’, in Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 251–258.
[87]
J. Fernandez, ‘Fang Architectonics’. 1977. Available: http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/12695104?selectedversion=NBD5337787
[88]
D. Miller, ‘Behind closed doors’, in Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors, Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 1–19.
[89]
G. McCraken, ‘Homeyness - A cultural account of one constellation of consumer goods and meanings’, in Interpretive consumer research, [London]: Association for Consumer Research, 1989, pp. 168–183.
[90]
D. Froud, ‘Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–233, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053473
[91]
M. Gullestad, ‘Hearth and home’, in Kitchen-table society: a case study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway, Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: Distribution in United States and Canada, Columbia University Press, 1984.
[92]
S. Chevalier, ‘From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb’, in Material cultures: why some things matter, London: University College London Press, 1997.
[93]
D. J. B. Young, ‘The Material Value of Color: The Estate Agent’s Tale’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053572
[94]
M. Csikszentmihalyi and E. Halton, The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167611
[95]
T. Putnam and C. Newton, Household choices. London: Futures, 1990.
[96]
D. Miller, Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[97]
J.-S. Marcoux, ‘Body Exchanges: Material Culture, Gender and Stereotypes in the Making’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–60, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053608
[98]
B. Colomina and J. Bloomer, Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture. New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992.
[99]
C. Cullens, ‘Gimme Shelter: At Home with the Millennium ’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 204–227, 1999.
[100]
J. Sanders, Stud: architectures of masculinity. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996.
[101]
D. Spain, Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
[102]
D. Froud, ‘Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–233, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053473
[103]
D. Hayden, The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981.
[104]
K. Fehervary, ‘American Kitchens, Luxury Bathrooms, and the Search for a “Normal” Life in Postsocialist Hungary’, Ethnos, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 369–400, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1080/0014184022000031211
[105]
R. Silverstone, Visions of suburbia. London: Routledge, 1997.
[106]
S. P. Blier, The anatomy of architecture: ontology and metaphor in Batammaliba architectural expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[107]
M. de Certeau, L. Giard, and P. Mayol, Practice of Everyday Life: Volume 2: Living and Cooking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5vkbhw
[108]
V. Buchli, An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1999.
[109]
J.-S. Marcoux, ‘The “Casser Maison” Ritual: Constructing the Self by Emptying the Home’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 213–235, July 2001, doi: 10.1177/135918350100600205
[110]
M. Foucault, Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
[111]
C. Helliwell, ‘Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse’, in Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.
[112]
G. Bachelard, The poetics of space. Boston [Mass.]: Beacon Press, 1994.
[113]
L. Prussin, ‘When Nomads settle: Changing Technologies of Building and Transport and the Production of Architectural Form among the Gabra’, in African material culture, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 73–102. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780253116635/
[114]
Victor Buchli, An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1999.
[115]
M. Foucault, ‘Space, knowledge and power’, in The Foucault reader, London: Penguin, 1991, pp. 239–256. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=09e491f4-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[116]
V. Buchli and G. Lucas, ‘The Archaeology of Alienation: a late twentieth-century British Council Flat’, in Archaeologies of the contemporary past, London: Routledge, 2001.
[117]
M. Bloch, ‘The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafimaniry of Madagascar’, in About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 69–83. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
[118]
E. Hallam and J. L. Hockey, Death, memory and material culture, vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[119]
E. Chaplin, ‘The use of visual representation in anthropology and sociology’, in Sociology and visual representation, London: Routledge, 1994.
[120]
‘Learning outcomes’.
[122]
M. Richardson, ‘being-in-the-market versus being-in-the-plaza: material culture and the construction of social reality in Spanish America’, American Ethnologist, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 421–436, 1982, doi: 10.1525/ae.1982.9.2.02a00120
[123]
‘Background Readings’.
[124]
T. Cresswell, Place: a short introduction, vol. Short introductions to geography. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2004.
[125]
D. B. Massey, For space. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2005.
[126]
S. M. Low and D. Lawrence-Zúñiga, The anthropology of space and place: locating culture, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2003.
[127]
C. Y. Tilley, A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments, vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1994.
[128]
‘Lab Session Preparation’.
[129]
I. Kopytoff, ‘The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process’, The Social Life of Things, 1986. Available: http://web-facstaff.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Kopytoff_CulturalBiography.pdf
[130]
H. Horst and D. Miller, ‘From kinship to link‐up: cell phones and social networking in Jamaica’, Current Anthropology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 755–778, Dec. 2005, Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/432650
[131]
J. Kallinkos, A. Aaltonen, and A. Marton, ‘A Theory of Digital Objects’, 2010. Available: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3033/2564
[132]
J. Pfaff, ‘A mobile phone: mobility, materiality and everyday Swahili trading practices’, Cultural Geographies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 341–357, July 2010, doi: 10.1177/1474474010368606
[133]
A. Appadurai, ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 295–310, June 1990, doi: 10.1177/026327690007002017
[134]
B. Barendregt, ‘Sex, Cannibals, and the Language of Cool: Indonesian Tales of the Phone and Modernity’, The Information Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 160–170, May 2008, doi: 10.1080/01972240802020044
[135]
T. Dant, ‘True Automobility’, in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion, London: Routledge, 2014.
[136]
L. Haddon, ‘Domestication and Mobile Telephony’, in Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology, Transaction Publishers.
[137]
P. Harvey and H. Knox, ‘“Introduction” in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion’, in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion, London: Routledge, 2014.
[138]
H. A. Horst and D. Miller, The cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Oxford: Berg, 2006. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847883193
[139]
H. A. Horst, ‘The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields’, Global Networks, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 143–159, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x
[140]
Y. Hui, ‘What is a Digital Object?’, Metaphilosophy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 380–395, July 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
[141]
P. Kockelman, ‘The anthropology of an equation’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.3.003
[142]
J. Mcintosh, ‘Mobile phones and Mipoho’s prophecy: The powers and dangers of flying language’, American Ethnologist, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 337–353, May 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01259.x
[143]
S. W. Mintz, Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. Penguin Books, 1986.
[144]
E. Ruppert, J. Law, and M. Savage, ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 22–46, July 2013, doi: 10.1177/0263276413484941
[145]
F. M. Stammler, ‘Mobile Phone Revolution in the Tundra? Technological Change among Russian Reindeer Nomads’, Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, vol. 41, pp. 47–78, 2009, doi: 10.7592/FEJF2009.41.stammler
[146]
J. Sterne, ‘The mp3 as cultural artifact’, New Media & Society, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 825–842, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461444806067737
[147]
M. Strathern, ‘Abstraction and Decontextualisation or E for Ethnography’, 2000. Available: http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
[148]
S. Tenhunen, ‘Mobile technology in the village: ICTs, culture, and social logistics in India’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 515–534, Sept. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00515.x
[149]
A. Viseu and L. Suchman, ‘Wearable Augmentation: Imaginaries of the Informed Body’, in Technologized images, technologized bodies, New York: Berghahn Books, 2010. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1337807
[150]
D. MacDougall, ‘The Visual in Anthropology’, in Rethinking visual anthropology, London: Yale University Press, 1999, pp. 276–295.
[151]
S. Pink, ‘Digital Visual Anthropology: Potentials and Challenges’, in Made to be seen: perspectives on the history of visual anthropology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780226036632/startPage/209
[152]
‘Imaging Digital Lives, Special Issue of Journal of Material Culture’, Available: http://mcu.sagepub.com/content/18/3.toc.pdf
[153]
S. Murray, ‘Digital Images, Photo-Sharing, and Our Shifting Notions of Everyday Aesthetics’, Journal of Visual Culture, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–163, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1470412908091935
[154]
E. Gómez Cruz and A. Lehmuskallio, Eds, Digital photography and everyday life: empirical studies on material visual practices, vol. Routledge studies in European communication research and education. London: Routledge, 2016. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com/action/showBook?doi=10.4324/9781315696768
[155]
N. A. Van House, ‘Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual’, Visual Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 125–134, June 2011, doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888
[156]
S. Vivienne and J. Burgess, ‘The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 279–298, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1359183513492080
[157]
E. Gómez Cruz and E. Ardèvol, ‘Some ethnographic notes on a Flickr group’, Photographies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–44, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1080/17540763.2013.788836
[158]
P. Favero, ‘Learning to look beyond the frame: reflections on the changing meaning of images in the age of digital media practices’, Visual Studies, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 166–179, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/1472586X.2014.887269
[159]
S. Pink, Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research, Second edition. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2007. Available: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-visual-ethnography
[160]
S. McQuire, ‘Photography’s afterlife: Documentary images and the operational archive’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 223–241, Sept. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1359183513489930
[161]
M. Sturken and L. Cartwright, Practices of looking: an introduction to visual culture, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[162]
S. Pink, L. Kürti, and A. I. Afonso, Working images: visual research and representation in ethnography. London: Routledge, 2004.
[163]
B. Latour, ‘What is Iconoclash ? or Is there a world beyond the image wars?’, Horizontes antropológicos, vol. 14, no. 29, pp. 110–150, Available: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/84-ICONOCLASH%20PDF.pdf
[164]
W. J. Mitchell, The reconfigured eye: visual truth in the post-photographic era, 1st MIT Press paperback ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1994.
[165]
‘Learning outcomes’.
[166]
M. Conkey, ‘Style, Design and Function’, in Handbook of material culture, London: SAGE, 2006. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9781446206430/startPage/355
[167]
C. Y. Tilley, Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE, 2006. Available: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781446206430
[168]
Michael. Shanks and C. Y. Tilley, ‘Social values, social constraints and material culture: the design of contemporary beer cans’, in Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice, 2nd ed.London: Routledge, 1992.
[169]
D. Frankel, ‘Pottery decoration as an indicator of social relationships: a prehistoric Cypriot example’, in Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics, London: Duckworth, 1978.
[170]
S. M. Korn, ‘The formal analysis of visual systems as exemplified by a study of the Abelam (Papua New Guinea) paintings’, in Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics, London: Duckworth, 1978.
[171]
G. A. Reichard, Melanesian design: a study of style in wood and tortoiseshell carving. New York: AMS Press, 1969.
[172]
M. C. Roaf, ‘A mathematical analysis of the styles of the Persepolis reliefs’, in Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics, London: Duckworth, 1978.
[173]
D. K. Washburn and D. W. Crowe, Symmetries of culture: theory and practice of plane pattern analysis. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988.
[174]
‘Lab Session Preparation’.
[175]
M. Kwon, ‘Sitings of Public Art: Integration versus Intervention’, in One place after another: site-specific art and locational identity, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2002. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ea5249bb-ecf4-e611-80c9-005056af4099
[176]
R. Deutsche, ‘Uneven Development: Public Art in New York City’, October, vol. 47, pp. 3–52, 1988, doi: 10.2307/778979
[177]
R. Schacter, ‘The ugly truth: Street Art, Graffiti and the Creative City’, Art & the Public Sphere, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 161–176, 2014, Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=112192978&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[178]
R. Deutsche and Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts, Evictions: art and spatial politics, vol. Graham Foundation/MIT Press series in contemporary architectural discourse. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996.
[179]
J. Hillier, ‘`Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real’’, Planning Theory, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–59, 2003, doi: 10.1177/1473095203002001005
[180]
J. de Wolf, ‘Hocking, Bree T. 2015. The great reimagining: public art, urban space and the symbolic landscapes of a “new” Northern Ireland. New York: Berghahn (Material mediations: people and things in a world of movement; volume 4). 232 pp. US$95.00. ISBN: 978-1-7823’, Social Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 258–260, May 2016, doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12248
[181]
G. H. Kester, Art, activism, and oppositionality: essays from Afterimage. Durham, [NC]: Duke University Press, 1998.
[182]
S. Lacy, Mapping the terrain: new genre public art. Seattle, Wash: Bay Press, 1995.
[183]
C. Mouffe, ‘Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces’, Art and Research, vol. 1, no. 2, 2007, Available: https://mail.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/mouffe.html
[184]
R. Schacter, ‘An Ethnography of Iconoclash’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–61, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1359183507086217. Available: https://journals-sagepub-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/1359183507086217
[185]
R. Schacter, Ornament and order: graffiti, street art and the parergon. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2014. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781472409997
[186]
J. E. Young, ‘The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 267–296, 1992, Available: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1343784
[187]
S. Zukin and L. Braslow, ‘The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones’, City, Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 131–140, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2011.06.003
[188]
D. Flynn, ‘My Customers are Different! Identity, Difference, and the Political Economy of Design’, in Ethnography and the corporate encounter: reflections on research in and of corporations, New York: Berghahn Books, 2009. Available: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[189]
D. Nafus and K. Anderson, ‘Writing on Walls: the materiality of social memory in corporate research’, in Ethnography and the corporate encounter : reflections on research in and of corporations, M. Cefkin, Ed., New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2009, pp. 137–157. Available: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[190]
A. Drazin, ‘The Social Life of Concepts in Design Anthropology’, in Design anthropology: theory and practice, W. Gunn and R. C. Smith, Eds, London: Bloomsbury, 2013, pp. 33–50.
[191]
A. Drazin and S. Roberts, ‘Exploring Design Dialogues for Ageing in Place’, Anthropology in Action, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 72–88, 2009, doi: 10.3167/aia.2009.160107
[192]
U. Mellstrom, ‘The Intersection of Gender, Race and Cultural Boundaries, or Why is Computer Science in Malaysia Dominated by Women?’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 885–907, 2009, doi: 10.1177/0306312709334636
[193]
P. Ross, ‘Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 251–270, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0306312710385851
[194]
L. Suchman, ‘Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial’, in The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed.Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008, pp. 139–165. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262274685
[195]
D. Tunstall, ‘Decolonizing Design Innovation: Design Anthropology, Critical Anthropology, and Indigenous Knowledge’, in Design anthropology: theory and practice, W. Gunn and R. C. Smith, Eds, London: Bloomsbury, 2013, pp. 232–250.
[196]
L. Suchman, ‘Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2011, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640
[197]
J. Fulton Suri, ‘Poetic Observation: What Designers Make of What They See’, in Design anthropology: object culture in the 21st century, A. J. Clarke, Ed., Wien: Springer, 2011, pp. 16–32.
[198]
T. Ingold, ‘Anthropology is Not Ethnography’, in Proceedings of the British Academy, 2007, pp. 69–92.
[199]
J. Frascara, Design and the social sciences: making connections, vol. Contemporary Trends Institute. London: Taylor & Francis, 2002. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203301302
[200]
S. E. Squires and B. Byrne, Creating breakthrough ideas: the collaboration of anthropologists and designers in the product development industry. Westport, Conn: Bergin & Garvey, 2002.
[201]
J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, ‘Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (Hardback) - Routledge’, 2012. Available: http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415694407/
[202]
R. Deutsche and Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts, Evictions: art and spatial politics, vol. Graham Foundation/MIT Press series in contemporary architectural discourse. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1996.
[203]
J. Hillier, ‘`Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real’’, Planning Theory, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–59, 2003, doi: 10.1177/1473095203002001005
[204]
J. de Wolf, ‘Hocking, Bree T. 2015. The great reimagining: public art, urban space and the symbolic landscapes of a “new” Northern Ireland. New York: Berghahn (Material mediations: people and things in a world of movement; volume 4). 232 pp. US$95.00. ISBN: 978-1-7823’, Social Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 258–260, May 2016, doi: 10.1111/1469-8676.12248
[205]
G. H. Kester, Art, activism, and oppositionality: essays from Afterimage. Durham, [NC]: Duke University Press, 1998.
[206]
S. Lacy, Mapping the terrain: new genre public art. Seattle, Wash: Bay Press, 1995.
[207]
C. Mouffe, ‘Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces’, Art and Research, vol. 1, no. 2, 2007, Available: https://mail.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/mouffe.html
[208]
R. Schacter, ‘An Ethnography of Iconoclash’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 35–61, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1359183507086217. Available: https://journals-sagepub-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/1359183507086217
[209]
R. Schacter, Ornament and order: graffiti, street art and the parergon. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2014. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781472409997
[210]
C. Y. Tilley, A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments, vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1994.
[211]
J. E. Young, ‘The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 267–296, 1992, Available: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1343784
[212]
S. Zukin and L. Braslow, ‘The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones’, City, Culture and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 131–140, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ccs.2011.06.003
