1.
Buchli V. The material culture reader. Oxford: Berg; 2002.
2.
Tilley CY. Handbook of material culture [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2006. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
3.
M. Rowlands. A materialist approach to materiality. Materiality [Internet]. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2005. p. 72–87. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://read.dukeupress.edu/content/materiality
4.
J-P. Warnier. A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World. Journal of Material Culture. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 2001 Mar 1;6(1):5–24.
5.
Tilley C. Ethnography and Material Culture. Handbook of ethnography [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2001. p. 258–272. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/handbook-of-ethnography/SAGE.xml
6.
William Roseberry. Marx and Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology [Internet]. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews Inc.; 1997;26:25–46. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952513
7.
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments [Internet]. Oxford: Berg; 1994. p. 7–34. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d31d0aaf-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
8.
Abram D. Philosophy on the way to ecology: a technical introduction to the inquiry. The spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage Books; 1996. p. 31–72.
9.
Helliwell C. Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology [Internet]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1996. p. 128–148. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7bdefea9-46b3-e711-80cb-005056af4099
10.
Adams PC, Hoelscher SD, Till KE. Textures of place: exploring humanist geographies [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2001. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttg77
11.
Casey ES. How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena. Senses of place. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press; 1996. p. 13–52.
12.
Casey ES. Getting back into place: toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. 2nd ed. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press; 2009.
13.
Csáky M. How does it feel? Exploring the world of your senses. London: Thames and Hudson; 1979.
14.
Thomas J. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge; 1996.
15.
Weiss G, Haber HF. Perspectives on embodiment: the intersections of nature and culture [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203905258
16.
Hammond M, Howarth J, Keat R. Understanding phenomenology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1991.
17.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge; 2012.
18.
Madison GB. The phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty: a search for the limits of consciousness. Athens: Ohio University Press; 1981.
19.
Weiner JF. Tree leaf talk: a Heideggerian anthropology. Oxford: Berg; 2001.
20.
Sperber D. Claude Levi-Strauss. Structuralism and since: from Lévi-Strauss to Derrida. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 19–51.
21.
Sturrock J. Social Sciences. Structuralism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Pub; 2003. p. 48–73.
22.
Derrida J. Writing and Man’s Exploitation by Man. Of grammatology. Corrected ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1997. p. 118–140.
23.
Morris RC. Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2007 Sept;36(1):355–389.
24.
Claire, Jacobson, and Brooke, Grundfest, Schoepf. Split representation in the Art of Asia and America. Structural anthropology [Internet]. [New York]: Basic Books; 1963. p. 245–266. Available from: https://soth.alexanderstreet.com/cgi-bin/SOTH/hub.py?type=getdoc&docid=S10021413-D000014
25.
Claude Lévi-Strauss. The Salish Swaihwe. The way of the masks. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 1982. p. 15–39.
26.
Christopher, Tilley. Claude Levi Strauss: structuralism and beyond. Reading material culture: structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1990. p. 3–80.
27.
Brunette P. Open City (1945). Roberto Rossellini. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1996. p. 41–60.
28.
Peter Brunette, David Wills. The Frame of the Frame. Screen/play: Derrida and film theory [Internet]. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1989. p. 99–138. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zthjb.7
29.
Christopher Norris. De Man and the Critique of Romantic Ideology. Paul de Man: deconstruction and the critique of aesthetic ideology. London: Routledge; 1988. p. 28–64.
30.
Peter Brunette and David Wills. Introduction: The spatial arts : an interview with Jacques Derrida. Deconstruction and the visual arts: art, media, architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994.
31.
Fortis P. The birth of design: a Kuna theory of body and personhood. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. Royal Anthropological Institute; 2010 Aug 5;16(3):480–495.
32.
Gell A. The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams. Oxford: Berg; 2006. p. 159–186.
33.
Tim Ingold. Of string bags and bird’s nests. Skill and the construction of artefacts. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 349–361.
34.
Gell A, Kokuritsu Minzokugaku Hakubutsukan. Time and social anthropology. Senri Ethnological Studies. 1998;45.
35.
British Academy. Proceedings of the British Academy. London: Oxford University Press; :123–147.
36.
Gell A. Metamorphosis of the cassowaries: Umeda society, language and ritual. London: Athlone Press; 1975.
37.
Gell A. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: Berg; 1992.
38.
Gell A. Wrapping in images: tattooing in Polynesia. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1993.
39.
Gell A. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.
40.
Gell A, Hirsch E. The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams. Oxford: Berg; 2006.
41.
Pinney C, Thomas N. Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Oxford: Berg; 2001.
42.
Carl Knappett. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture. SAGE Journals; 2002 Mar 1;7(1):97–117.
43.
Rampley M. Art history and cultural difference: Alfred Gell’s anthropology of art. Art History. 2005 Sept;28(4):524–551.
44.
Morphy H. Art as a Mode of Action: Some Problems with Gell’s Art and Agency. Journal of Material Culture. SAGE Journals; 2009 Mar 1;14(1):5–27.
45.
Tim Ingold. Lines: a brief history. Abingdon: Routledge; 2007.
46.
Ingold T. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge; 2000.
47.
Ingold T. Evolution and social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
48.
Tim Ingold. Making culture and weaving the world: Artefacts and organisms. Matter, materiality and modern culture [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2000. p. 50–71. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203351635/startPage/63/1
49.
Arjun Appadurai. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. London: University of Minnesota Press; 1996. p. 27–44.
50.
Taussig M. Redeeming Indigo. Theory, Culture & Society. SAGE Journals; 2008 May 1;25(3):1–15.
51.
Heyman JMcC, Campbell H. The anthropology of global flows: A critical reading of Appadurai’s `Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’. Anthropological Theory. SAGE Journals; 2009 June 12;9(2):131–148.
52.
Jay M. Unsympathetic Magic:Nervous System. Visual Anthropology Review. American Anthropological Association; 1993 Sept;9(2):79–82.
53.
Taussig M. Michael Taussig Replies to Martin Jay. Visual Anthropology Review. American Anthropological Association; 1994 Mar;10(1):154–154.
54.
Jay M. Martin Jay Replies to Michael Taussig and Paul Stoller. Visual Anthropology Review. American Anthropological Association; 1994 Mar;10(1):163–164.
55.
Taussig MT. Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. New York: Routledge; 1993.
56.
Taussig MT. Beauty and the beast [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226789880
57.
Hevia JL. History, Theory, and Colonial Power: The Critical Method of Michael Taussig in Shamanism, Colonialism, and The Wild Man. Journal of Historical Sociology. Wiley; 1992 Mar;5(1):104–125.
58.
Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste [Internet]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1984. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1433990
59.
Wypijewski J, Komar V, Melamid A. Painting by numbers: Komar and Melamid’s scientific guide to art. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux; 1997.
60.
Binkley S. Kitsch as a Repetitive System: A Problem for the Theory of Taste Hierarchy. Journal of Material Culture. SAGE Journals; 2000 July 1;5(2):131–152.
61.
Susan Orlean. Art for Everybody. 2001; Available from: http://www.susanorlean.com/articles/art_for_everybody.php
62.
Boylan AL. Thomas Kinkade: the artist in the mall [Internet]. Durham [NC]: Duke University Press; 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822393399
63.
Fortis P. Kuna art and Shamanism: an ethnographic approach [Internet]. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press; 2012. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=497088&site=ehost-live&scope=site
64.
Bessire L, Bond D. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist. 2014 Aug;41(3):440–456.
65.
Campbell S. The Captivating Agency of Art: many Ways of Seeing. Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Oxford: Berg; 2001.
66.
Forge A. Style and Meaning in Sepik Art. Primitive art & society. London: Oxford University Press for the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research; 1973.
67.
Gell A. Style and culture (Chapter 8). Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998.
68.
Holbraad M, Pedersen MA, Viveiros de Castro E. The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions. Cultural anthropology journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology [Internet]. Cultural Anthropology Online: American Anthropological Association; Available from: http://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
69.
Lévi-Strauss C. Split representation in the Art of Asia and America. The anthropology of art: a reader. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2006.
70.
Losche D. THE SEPIK GAZE: Iconographic Interpretation of Abelam Form. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice [Internet]. 1995;(38):47–60. Available from: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23171708?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
71.
Viveiros de Castro E. Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation. Tipití - Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America [Internet]. 2004;2(1):3–22. Available from: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=tipiti
72.
Schüll ND. Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas [Internet]. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400834655
73.
Buchli V. Architecture and the domestic sphere. The material culture reader. Oxford: Berg; 2002. p. 207–213.
74.
Bourdieu P. The Berber house or the world reversed. Social Science Information. 1970;9(2):151–170.
75.
Garvey P. Organized Disorder: Moving furniture in Norwegian Homes. In: Miller D, editor. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors [Internet]. Oxford: Berg; 2001. p. 47–68. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e0b9b145-45db-e711-80cd-005056af4099
76.
Benjamin W, Tiedemann R. The arcades project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press; 2002.
77.
Reimer S, Leslie D. Identity, Consumption, and the Home. Home Cultures. 2004 July 1;1(2):187–208.
78.
Buchli V, Lucas G. ‘The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth century British council house’. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: Routledge; 2001.
79.
Chevalier S. ‘From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb’. Material cultures: why some things matter. London: University College London Press; 1997.
80.
Miller D. Appropriating the state on the council estate. Man. 1988;23(2):353–372.
81.
Carsten J. Houses of Memory and Kinship. After Kinship [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. p. 31–56. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800382
82.
Cieraad I. At home: an anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press; 1999.
83.
Humphrey C. Inside a Mongolian tent. New society. London: New Science Publications; 1974;30(630):273–275.
84.
Low SM, Lawrence-Zúñiga D. The anthropology of space and place: locating culture. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2003.
85.
Rivière P. Houses, places and people: community and continuity in Guiana. About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 189–205. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
86.
Gell A. ‘9.6 The Maori meeting house’. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1998. p. 251–258.
87.
Fernandez J. Fang Architectonics [Internet]. 1977. Available from: http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/12695104?selectedversion=NBD5337787
88.
Miller D. Behind closed doors. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg; 2001. p. 1–19.
89.
McCraken G. Homeyness - A cultural account of one constellation of consumer goods and meanings. Interpretive consumer research. [London]: Association for Consumer Research; 1989. p. 168–183.
90.
Froud D. Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time. Home Cultures. 2004 Nov 1;1(3):211–233.
91.
Gullestad M. Hearth and home. Kitchen-table society: a case study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: Distribution in United States and Canada, Columbia University Press; 1984.
92.
Chevalier S. From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb. Material cultures: why some things matter. London: University College London Press; 1997.
93.
Young DJB. The Material Value of Color: The Estate Agent’s Tale. Home Cultures. 2004;1(1):5–22.
94.
Csikszentmihalyi M, Halton E. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167611
95.
Putnam T, Newton C. Household choices. London: Futures; 1990.
96.
Miller D. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg; 2001.
97.
Marcoux JS. Body Exchanges: Material Culture, Gender and Stereotypes in the Making. Home Cultures. 2004 Mar 1;1(1):51–60.
98.
Colomina B, Bloomer J. Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press; 1992.
99.
Cullens C. Gimme Shelter: At Home with the Millennium . Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 1999;11(2):204–227.
100.
Sanders J. Stud: architectures of masculinity. New York: Princeton Architectural Press; 1996.
101.
Spain D. Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1992.
102.
Froud D. Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time. Home Cultures. 2004 Nov 1;1(3):211–233.
103.
Hayden D. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1981.
104.
Fehervary K. American Kitchens, Luxury Bathrooms, and the Search for a ‘Normal’ Life in Postsocialist Hungary. Ethnos. 2001 Nov;67(3):369–400.
105.
Silverstone R. Visions of suburbia. London: Routledge; 1997.
106.
Blier SP. The anatomy of architecture: ontology and metaphor in Batammaliba architectural expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
107.
Certeau M de, Giard L, Mayol P. Practice of Everyday Life: Volume 2: Living and Cooking [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 2014. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5vkbhw
108.
Buchli V. An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg Publishers; 1999.
109.
Marcoux JS. The ‘Casser Maison’ Ritual: Constructing the Self by Emptying the Home. Journal of Material Culture. 2001 July 1;6(2):213–235.
110.
Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books; 1995.
111.
Helliwell C. Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1996.
112.
Bachelard G. The poetics of space. Boston [Mass.]: Beacon Press; 1994.
113.
Prussin L. When Nomads settle: Changing Technologies of Building and Transport and the Production of Architectural Form among the Gabra. African material culture [Internet]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1996. p. 73–102. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780253116635/
114.
Victor Buchli. An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg Publishers; 1999.
115.
Foucault M. Space, knowledge and power. The Foucault reader [Internet]. London: Penguin; 1991. p. 239–256. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=09e491f4-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
116.
Buchli V, Lucas G. The Archaeology of Alienation: a late twentieth-century British Council Flat. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: Routledge; 2001.
117.
Bloch M. The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafimaniry of Madagascar. About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995. p. 69–83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
118.
Hallam E, Hockey JL. Death, memory and material culture. Oxford: Berg; 2001.
119.
Chaplin E. The use of visual representation in anthropology and sociology. Sociology and visual representation. London: Routledge; 1994.
122.
Richardson M. being-in-the-market versus being-in-the-plaza: material culture and the construction of social reality in Spanish America. American Ethnologist. 1982;9(2):421–436.
123.
Background Readings.
124.
Cresswell T. Place: a short introduction. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2004.
125.
Massey DB. For space. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2005.
126.
Low SM, Lawrence-Zúñiga D. The anthropology of space and place: locating culture. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2003.
127.
Tilley CY. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: Berg; 1994.
128.
Lab Session Preparation.
129.
Kopytoff I. The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process [Internet]. Appadurai A, editor. The Social Life of Things. Cambridge University Press; 1986. p. 64–91. Available from: http://web-facstaff.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Kopytoff_CulturalBiography.pdf
130.
Horst H, Miller D. From kinship to link‐up: cell phones and social networking in Jamaica. Current Anthropology [Internet]. 2005 Dec;46(5):755–778. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/432650
131.
Kallinkos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A. A Theory of Digital Objects [Internet]. First Monday; 2010. Available from: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3033/2564
132.
Pfaff J. A mobile phone: mobility, materiality and everyday Swahili trading practices. Cultural Geographies. 2010 July 1;17(3):341–357.
133.
Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture & Society. 1990 June 1;7(2):295–310.
134.
Barendregt B. Sex, Cannibals, and the Language of Cool: Indonesian Tales of the Phone and Modernity. The Information Society. 2008 May 6;24(3):160–170.
135.
Dant T. True Automobility. Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. London: Routledge; 2014.
136.
Haddon L. Domestication and Mobile Telephony. Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. Transaction Publishers;
137.
Harvey P, Knox H. ‘Introduction’ in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. London: Routledge; 2014.
138.
Horst HA, Miller D. The cell phone: an anthropology of communication [Internet]. Oxford: Berg; 2006. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847883193
139.
Horst HA. The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks. 2006 Apr;6(2):143–159.
140.
Hui Y. What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy. 2012 July;43(4):380–395.
141.
Kockelman P. The anthropology of an equation. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 2013 Dec 23;3(3).
142.
Mcintosh J. Mobile phones and Mipoho’s prophecy: The powers and dangers of flying language. American Ethnologist. 2010 May;37(2):337–353.
143.
Mintz SW. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. Penguin Books; 1986.
144.
Ruppert E, Law J, Savage M. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 2013 July 1;30(4):22–46.
145.
Stammler FM. Mobile Phone Revolution in the Tundra? Technological Change among Russian Reindeer Nomads. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore. 2009;41:47–78.
146.
Sterne J. The mp3 as cultural artifact. New Media & Society. 2006 Oct 1;8(5):825–842.
147.
Strathern M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation or E for Ethnography [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
148.
Tenhunen S. Mobile technology in the village: ICTs, culture, and social logistics in India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 2008 Sept;14(3):515–534.
149.
Viseu A, Suchman L. Wearable Augmentation: Imaginaries of the Informed Body. Technologized images, technologized bodies [Internet]. New York: Berghahn Books; 2010. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1337807
150.
MacDougall D. The Visual in Anthropology. Rethinking visual anthropology. London: Yale University Press; 1999. p. 276–295.
151.
Pink S. Digital Visual Anthropology: Potentials and Challenges. Made to be seen: perspectives on the history of visual anthropology [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780226036632/startPage/209
152.
Imaging Digital Lives, Special Issue of Journal of Material Culture. Available from: http://mcu.sagepub.com/content/18/3.toc.pdf
153.
Murray S. Digital Images, Photo-Sharing, and Our Shifting Notions of Everyday Aesthetics. Journal of Visual Culture. 2008 Aug 1;7(2):147–163.
154.
Gómez Cruz E, Lehmuskallio A, editors. Digital photography and everyday life: empirical studies on material visual practices [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2016. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/action/showBook?doi=10.4324/9781315696768
155.
Van House NA. Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies. 2011 June;26(2):125–134.
156.
Vivienne S, Burgess J. The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling. Journal of Material Culture. 2013 Sept 1;18(3):279–298.
157.
Gómez Cruz E, Ardèvol E. Some ethnographic notes on a Flickr group. Photographies. 2013 Mar;6(1):35–44.
158.
Favero P. Learning to look beyond the frame: reflections on the changing meaning of images in the age of digital media practices. Visual Studies. 2014 May 4;29(2):166–179.
159.
Pink S. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in research [Internet]. Second edition. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2007. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-visual-ethnography
160.
McQuire S. Photography’s afterlife: Documentary images and the operational archive. Journal of Material Culture. 2013 Sept 1;18(3):223–241.
161.
Sturken M, Cartwright L. Practices of looking: an introduction to visual culture. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
162.
Pink S, Kürti L, Afonso AI. Working images: visual research and representation in ethnography. London: Routledge; 2004.
163.
Latour B. What is Iconoclash ? or Is there a world beyond the image wars? Horizontes antropológicos [Internet]. [Peer Reviewed Journal]. 14(29):110–150. Available from: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/84-ICONOCLASH%20PDF.pdf
164.
Mitchell WJ. The reconfigured eye: visual truth in the post-photographic era. 1st MIT Press paperback ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1994.
166.
Conkey M. Style, Design and Function. Handbook of material culture [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2006. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9781446206430/startPage/355
167.
Tilley CY. Handbook of material culture [Internet]. London: SAGE; 2006. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781446206430
168.
Shanks Michael, Tilley CY. Social values, social constraints and material culture: the design of contemporary beer cans. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1992.
169.
Frankel D. Pottery decoration as an indicator of social relationships: a prehistoric Cypriot example. Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. London: Duckworth; 1978.
170.
Korn SM. The formal analysis of visual systems as exemplified by a study of the Abelam (Papua New Guinea) paintings. Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. London: Duckworth; 1978.
171.
Reichard GA. Melanesian design: a study of style in wood and tortoiseshell carving. New York: AMS Press; 1969.
172.
Roaf MC. A mathematical analysis of the styles of the Persepolis reliefs. Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. London: Duckworth; 1978.
173.
Washburn DK, Crowe DW. Symmetries of culture: theory and practice of plane pattern analysis. Seattle: University of Washington Press; 1988.
174.
Lab Session Preparation.
175.
Kwon M. Sitings of Public Art: Integration versus Intervention. One place after another: site-specific art and locational identity [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2002. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ea5249bb-ecf4-e611-80c9-005056af4099
176.
Deutsche R. Uneven Development: Public Art in New York City. October. 1988;47:3–52.
177.
Schacter R. The ugly truth: Street Art, Graffiti and the Creative City. Art & the Public Sphere [Internet]. Intellect; 2014;3(2):161–176. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=112192978&site=ehost-live&scope=site
178.
Deutsche R, Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts. Evictions: art and spatial politics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1996.
179.
Hillier J. `Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real’. Planning Theory. SAGE Publications; 2003;2(1):37–59.
180.
de Wolf J. Hocking, Bree T. 2015. The great reimagining: public art, urban space and the symbolic landscapes of a ‘new’ Northern Ireland. New York: Berghahn (Material mediations: people and things in a world of movement; volume 4). 232 pp. US$95.00. ISBN: 978-1-7823. Social Anthropology. 2016 May;24(2):258–260.
181.
Kester GH. Art, activism, and oppositionality: essays from Afterimage. Durham, [NC]: Duke University Press; 1998.
182.
Lacy S. Mapping the terrain: new genre public art. Seattle, Wash: Bay Press; 1995.
183.
Mouffe C. Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces. Art and Research [Internet]. 2007;1(2). Available from: https://mail.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/mouffe.html
184.
Schacter R. An Ethnography of Iconoclash. Journal of Material Culture [Internet]. 2008;13(1):35–61. Available from: https://journals-sagepub-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/1359183507086217
185.
Schacter R. Ornament and order: graffiti, street art and the parergon [Internet]. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2014. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781472409997
186.
Young JE. The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1992;18(2):267–296. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1343784
187.
Zukin S, Braslow L. The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones. City, Culture and Society. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.; 2011;2(3):131–140.
188.
Flynn D. My Customers are Different! Identity, Difference, and the Political Economy of Design. Ethnography and the corporate encounter: reflections on research in and of corporations [Internet]. New York: Berghahn Books; 2009. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
189.
Nafus D, Anderson K. Writing on Walls: the materiality of social memory in corporate research. In: Cefkin M, editor. Ethnography and the corporate encounter : reflections on research in and of corporations [Internet]. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books; 2009. p. 137–157. Available from: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
190.
Drazin A. The Social Life of Concepts in Design Anthropology. In: Gunn W, Smith RC, editors. Design anthropology: theory and practice. London: Bloomsbury; 2013. p. 33–50.
191.
Drazin A, Roberts S. Exploring Design Dialogues for Ageing in Place. Anthropology in Action. 2009;16(1):72–88.
192.
Mellstrom U. The Intersection of Gender, Race and Cultural Boundaries, or Why is Computer Science in Malaysia Dominated by Women? Social Studies of Science. 2009;39(6):885–907.
193.
Ross P. Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science. 2010;41(2):251–270.
194.
Suchman L. Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial. The handbook of science and technology studies [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2008. p. 139–165. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262274685
195.
Tunstall D. Decolonizing Design Innovation: Design Anthropology, Critical Anthropology, and Indigenous Knowledge. In: Gunn W, Smith RC, editors. Design anthropology: theory and practice. London: Bloomsbury; 2013. p. 232–250.
196.
Suchman L. Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2011;40(1):1–18.
197.
Fulton Suri J. Poetic Observation: What Designers Make of What They See. In: Clarke AJ, editor. Design anthropology: object culture in the 21st century. Wien: Springer; 2011. p. 16–32.
198.
Ingold T. Anthropology is Not Ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy. 2007. p. 69–92.
199.
Frascara J. Design and the social sciences: making connections [Internet]. London: Taylor & Francis; 2002. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203301302
200.
Squires SE, Byrne B. Creating breakthrough ideas: the collaboration of anthropologists and designers in the product development industry. Westport, Conn: Bergin & Garvey; 2002.
201.
Simonsen J, Robertson T. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (Hardback) - Routledge [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415694407/
202.
Deutsche R, Graham Foundation for Advanced Studies in the Fine Arts. Evictions: art and spatial politics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1996.
203.
Hillier J. `Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals cannot be `Real’. Planning Theory. SAGE Publications; 2003;2(1):37–59.
204.
de Wolf J. Hocking, Bree T. 2015. The great reimagining: public art, urban space and the symbolic landscapes of a ‘new’ Northern Ireland. New York: Berghahn (Material mediations: people and things in a world of movement; volume 4). 232 pp. US$95.00. ISBN: 978-1-7823. Social Anthropology. 2016 May;24(2):258–260.
205.
Kester GH. Art, activism, and oppositionality: essays from Afterimage. Durham, [NC]: Duke University Press; 1998.
206.
Lacy S. Mapping the terrain: new genre public art. Seattle, Wash: Bay Press; 1995.
207.
Mouffe C. Artistic Activism and Agonistic Spaces. Art and Research [Internet]. 2007;1(2). Available from: https://mail.artandresearch.org.uk/v1n2/mouffe.html
208.
Schacter R. An Ethnography of Iconoclash. Journal of Material Culture [Internet]. 2008;13(1):35–61. Available from: https://journals-sagepub-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/1359183507086217
209.
Schacter R. Ornament and order: graffiti, street art and the parergon [Internet]. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2014. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781472409997
210.
Tilley CY. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: Berg; 1994.
211.
Young JE. The Counter-Monument: Memory against Itself in Germany Today. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1992;18(2):267–296. Available from: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1343784
212.
Zukin S, Braslow L. The life cycle of New York’s creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones. City, Culture and Society. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Ltd.; 2011;2(3):131–140.
