[1]
Achile Mbembe 2015. Decolonising Knowledge and the Question of the Archive. transcription of talk series, Wits University.
[2]
Agamben, Giorgio 1998. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford University Press.
[3]
Agrest, D. 1996. Architecture from without: body logic and sex. Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995. Princeton Architectural Press. 541–553.
[4]
Agrest, Diana et al. 1996. The sex of architecture. Harry N. Abrams.
[5]
Ahmed, S. 2006. Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
[6]
Allen, B. The Technical.
[7]
Amin Ghaziani and Matt Brim eds. 2019. Imagining Queer Methods. NYU Press.
[8]
Angela Last 2018. Internationalisation and Interdisciplinarity: Sharing across Boundaries? Decolonising the University. G.K. Bhambra et al., eds. Pluto Press.
[9]
Anthony D. King 1976. Towards a Theory of Colonial Urban Development. Colonial urban development: culture, social power and environment. Routledge and Kegan Paul. 22–40.
[10]
Arie Graafland and Heidi Sohn 2012. Introduction: Science and virtuality. The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. SAGE. 467–483.
[11]
Attfield, Judy 2000. Wild things: the material culture of everyday life. Berg.
[12]
Aureli, P.V. and Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture 2008. The project of autonomy: politics and architecture within and against capitalism. Princeton Architectural.
[13]
B. Campkin and R. Cox 2007. The visible and invisible: (de|)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. I.B. Tauris. 34–48.
[14]
Banham, P.R. 1982. Oases and resorts. Scenes in America deserta. Thames and Hudson. 21–44.
[15]
Banham, P.R. 1982. The eye of the beholder. Scenes in America deserta. Thames and Hudson. 209–228.
[16]
Banham, R. 1965. A Home is not a House. Art in America. 2, (1965), 70–79.
[17]
Barthes, R. Myth Today. Mythologies / Roland Barthes ; selected and translated from the French by Annette Lavers.
[18]
Ben Campkin 2018. Queer Urban Imaginaries. The Routledge Companion to Urban Imaginaries. C. Lindner and M. Meissner, eds. Routledge. 407–423.
[19]
Bender, B. 2002. Landscape and politics. The material culture reader. Berg. 135–174.
[20]
Bennett, Jane 2010. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
[21]
Bermann, K. 1998. The house behind. Places through the body. Routledge. 165–180.
[22]
Betsky, A. 1997. Queer space: architecture and same-sex desire. William Morrow & Co.
[23]
Bijsterveld, K. 2008. Infernal din, heavenly tunes : repertoires of dramatizing sound. Mechanical sound : technology, culture, and public problems of noise in the twentieth century. MIT Press. 27–51.
[24]
Blum, Virginia 1AD. Psychotopologies: closing the circuit between psychic and material space. Environment and Planning - Part D. 29, 6 (1AD), 1030–1047.
[25]
Bonnevier, K. 2007. Behind straight curtains: towards a queer feminist theory of architecture. Axl Books.
[26]
Bonta, J.P. 1979. From Written Dissemination to Text Analysis. Architecture and its interpretation: a study of expressive systems in architecture. Lund Humphries. 175–224.
[27]
Borden, I. and Rendell, J. 2000. From chamber to transformer: epistemological challenges in the methodology of theorised architectural history. The Journal of Architecture. 5, 2 (Jan. 2000), 215–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136023600408719.
[28]
Bourriaud, N. 2009. A precarious existence: vulnerability in the public domain. NAi Publishers.
[29]
Braidotti, R. Posthuman Relational Subjectivity. Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. 21–39.
[30]
Braidotti, R. 2006. Transpositions: on nomadic ethics. Polity.
[31]
Bressani, M. 2003. Viollet-le-Ducs’s optic. Architecture and the sciences : exchanging metaphors. Princeton University School of Architecture. 119–139.
[32]
Brown, L.A. 2011. Introduction. Feminist practices: interdisciplinary approaches to women in architecture. Ashgate. 1–15.
[33]
Brown, N. 2008. Immortality by Design. Parallax. 14, 3 (Jul. 2008), 4–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13534640802159096.
[34]
Browne, K. and Nash, C.J. eds. 2016. Queer methods and methodologies: intersecting queer theories and social science research. Routledge.
[35]
Buchli, V. 2002. Architecture and the domestic sphere. The material culture reader. Berg. 207–213.
[36]
Buchli, V. et al. 2001. The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth-century British council house. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. Victor Buchli and Gavin Lucas, eds. Routledge. 158–168.
[37]
Buchli, V. and Lucas, G. 2001. The archaeology of alienation : a late twentieth-century British council house. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. Routledge. 158–167.
[38]
Burgin, V. 1996. Geometry and abjection. In/different spaces : place and memory in visual culture. University of California Press. 38–56.
[39]
Burgin, V. 1992. Perverse Space. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press. 219–240.
[40]
Burgoyne, B. 2003. Autism and Topology. Drawing the soul: schemas and models in psychoanalysis. Karnac. 198–217.
[41]
Burns, K. 2012. A Girl’s Own Adventure. Journal of Architectural Education. 65, 2 (Mar. 2012), 125–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2011.01187.x.
[42]
Burns, K. 2010. Ex libris: Archaeologies of Feminism, Architecture and Deconstruction. Architectural Theory Review. 15, 3 (Dec. 2010), 242–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2010.524706.
[43]
Butler, J. 2006. Subjects of sex, gender, desire. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
[44]
Butler, Judith 2004. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
[45]
Campbell, Timothy C. 2011. Improper life: technology and biopolitics from Heidegger to Agamben. University of Minnesota Press.
[46]
Campkin, B. 2007. Ornament from grime: David Adjaye’s Dirty House, the architectural ‘aesthetic of recycling’ and the Gritty Brits. The Journal of Architecture. 12, 4 (Sep. 2007), 367–392. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360701614649.
[47]
Campkin, B. 2013. Placing "Matter Out Of Place”: Purity and Danger as Evidence for Architecture and Urbanism. Architectural Theory Review. 18, 1 (Apr. 2013), 46–61. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2013.785579.
[48]
Carpo, M. 2001. Architectural drawing in the age of its mechanical reproduction : Serlio. Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. MIT Press. 42–56.
[49]
Carpo, M. 2001. Prologue : architectural culture and technological context. Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. MIT Press. 1–15.
[50]
Carr, E.H. 2001. Ch. 2: Society and the individual. What is history?. Palgrave. 25–49.
[51]
Castoriadis, C. The psyche and the society anew. Figures of the Thinkable. 353–377.
[52]
Çelik, Zeynep 1997. Urban forms and colonial confrontations: Algiers under French rule. University of California Press.
[53]
de Cetreau, M. 1986. Psychoanalysis and its History. Heterologies: discourse on the other. University of Minnesota Press. 3–16.
[54]
Chakrabarty, D. 2008. Postcolonialism and the Artifice of History. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press. 27–46.
[55]
Chakrabarty, D. 2008. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.
[56]
Chakrabarty, D. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry. 35, 2 (Jan. 2009), 197–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/596640.
[57]
Chattopadhyay, S. 2000. Blurring Boundaries: The Limits of ‘White Town’ in Colonial Calcutta. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 59, 2 (Jun. 2000), 154–179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/991588.
[58]
Clough, P. and Willse, C. 2011. Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on Governance of Life and Death.
[59]
Coleman, D. 1996. Introduction from ‘Architecture and feminism’. Architecture and feminism. Princeton Architectural Press. ix–xvi.
[60]
Colomina, B. 1996. Archive. Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. MIT Press. 1–15.
[61]
Colomina, B. 1996. Interior. Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. MIT Press. 232–281.
[62]
Colomina, B. and Bloomer, J. 1992. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press.
[63]
Colquhoun, A. 1981. Essays in architectural criticism: modern architecture and historical change. MIT Press.
[64]
Crinson, M. 2003. Modern architecture and the end of empire. Ashgate.
[65]
‘Criticality’ and its discontents: http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/21/criticality-and-its-discontents.
[66]
Culler, J. 1994. Introduction: What’s the Point? The Point of theory: practices of cultural analysis. Amsterdam University Press.
[67]
Daniel Miller 2001. Behind closed doors. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Berg. 1–19.
[68]
De Block, G. 2016. Ecological infrastructure in a critical-historical perspective: From engineering ‘social’ territory to encoding ‘natural’ topography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 48, 2 (Feb. 2016), 367–390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X15600719.
[69]
Dirk van den Heuvel and Robert Gorny eds. 2017. Trans-Bodies / Queering (Footprint Self Architecture Theory Journal). 11, 21 (2017).
[70]
Dorrian, M. 2005. Criticism, negation, action. The Journal of Architecture. 10, 3 (Jun. 2005), 229–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360500162477.
[71]
Douglas, M. 2002. Chapter 2 - Secular defilement. Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. Routledge. 36–50.
[72]
Durning, M.L. and Wrigley, R. 2000. Gender and architecture. Wiley.
[73]
E. Shove 1999. Constructing home: a crossroads of choice. At home: an anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse University Press. 130–143.
[74]
Eco, U. 1997. Function and sign : the semiotics of architecture. Rethinking architecture : a reader in cultural theory. Routledge. 182–202.
[75]
Edward Said 2006. Orientalism. The post-colonial studies reader. (2006), 24–27.
[76]
Eisenman, P. 2007. Autonomy and the Will to the Critical. Written into the void: selected writings, 1990-2004. Yale University Press. 94–99.
[77]
Evans, R. 1997. Translations from drawing to building. Translations from drawing to building and other essays. Architectural Association. 153–194.
[78]
Fardon, R. 2013. Citations out of place, or, Lord Palmerston goes viral in the nineteenth century but gets lost in the twentieth. Anthropology Today. 29, 1 (Feb. 2013), 25–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12007.
[79]
Feenberg, A. 1999. Technology, philosophy, politics. Questioning technology. Routledge. 1–17.
[80]
Forty, A. 1986. Chapter 7 - Hygiene and Cleanliness. Objects of desire: design and society since 1750. Thames and Hudson. 156–181.
[81]
Forty, A. 2000. Design. Words and buildings: a vocabulary of modern architecture. Thames & Hudson. 136–141.
[82]
Foucault, M. 2007. Ch. 5: Lecture 8 February 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Palgrave Macmillan. 115–130.
[83]
Foucault, M. 2007. Ch. 13: Lecture 5 April 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Palgrave Macmillan. 333–358.
[84]
Foucault, M. et al. 2008. Course Summary and context. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Palgrave Macmillan. 317–331.
[85]
Foucault, M. et al. 1988. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Tavistock.
[86]
Foucault, M. and Senellart, M. 2008. Course Summary and context from The birth of biopolitics. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Palgrave Macmillan. 317–331.
[87]
Fraser, M. 2013. Introduction. Design research in architecture: an overview. Ashgate. 1–14.
[88]
Fraser, M. and Kerr, J. 2007. Architecture and the ‘special relationship’: the American influence on post-war British architecture. Routledge.
[89]
Freud, S. 1986. A Note on the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis. The essentials of psycho-analysis. Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 81–215.
[90]
Freud, S. 1986. Instincts and their Vicissitudes. The essentials of psycho-analysis. Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. 197–217.
[91]
Frichot, H. et al. eds. 2017. Architecture and feminisms: ecologies, economies, technologies. Routledge.
[92]
Frichot, H. 2018. Creative ecologies: theorizing the practice of architecture. Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
[93]
Frichot, H. 2010. Following Hélène Cixous’ Steps Towards A Writing Architecture. Architectural Theory Review. 15, 3 (Dec. 2010), 312–323. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13264826.2010.524310.
[94]
Fuss, D. and Sanders, J. 2019. Bergasse 19: Inside Freud’s Office. Stud: architectures of masculinity. J. Sanders, ed. Routledge. 112–132.
[95]
Galison, Peter, 1955-; Thompson, Emily Ann. 1999. The architecture of science. MIT Press.
[96]
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak 2006. Can the Subaltern Speak. The post-colonial studies reader. Routledge. 28–37.
[97]
Giedion, S. The Assembly Line and Scientific Management. Mechanization takes command: a contribution to anonymous history. 79–121.
[98]
Griselda Pollock 2000. Modernity and the Spaces of Femininity. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge.
[99]
Grosz, E.A. 1995. Space, time, and bodies. Space, time, and perversion : essays on the politics of bodies. Routledge. 83–87.
[100]
Guattari, F. 2007. La Borde: a clinic unlike any other. Chaosophy: Texts and interview 1972-1977. Semiotext(e). 176–194.
[101]
H. Heynen 2002. About histories and theory. The Journal of Architecture. 7, 2 (Jan. 2002), 205–220. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360210153656.
[102]
Haraway, D.J. 2004. The Haraway reader. Routledge.
[103]
Harrison, G. and Clifford, B. 2016. ‘The field of grain is gone; It’s now a Tesco Superstore’: representations of ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ within historical and contemporary discourses opposing urban expansion in England. Planning Perspectives. 31, 4 (Oct. 2016), 585–609. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2015.1103197.
[104]
Hartman, S. 2018. The Anarchy of Colored Girls Assembled in a Riotous Manner. South Atlantic Quarterly. 117, 3 (Jul. 2018), 465–490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-6942093.
[105]
Hauptmann, D. and Neidich, W. 2010. Introduction: Architecture and mind in the age of communication and information. Cognitive architecture: from biopolitics to noopolitics : architecture & mind in the age of communication and information. 010 Publishers. 10–43.
[106]
Hayden, D. 1981. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. MIT Press.
[107]
Hayden White 1984. The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory. History and Theory. 23, 1 (1984), 1–33.
[108]
Hays, K.M. 2010. Architecture’s desire: reading the late avant-garde. MIT Press.
[109]
Heidegger, M. 1977. The question concerning technology. The question concerning technology, and other essays. Harper & Row. 3–35.
[110]
Hernández, F. 2010. Bhabha for architects. Routledge.
[111]
Hernández, F. 2002. The transcultural phenomenon, and the transculturation of architecture. The Journal of Romance Studies. 2, 3 (Jan. 2002), 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3828/jrs.2.3.1.
[112]
Heynen, H. 1999. Architecture as critique of modernity. Architecture and modernity: a critique. MIT. 148, 249–218,258.
[113]
Heynen, H. 1999. What belongs to architecture?’ Avant-garde ideas in the modern movement. The Journal of Architecture. 4, 2 (Jan. 1999), 129–147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136023699373882.
[114]
Hill, J. 2013. Design research: the first 500 years. Design research in architecture: an overview. Ashgate. 15–34.
[115]
Holm, L. 2000. What Lacan said re: architecture. Critical Quarterly. 42, 2 (Jul. 2000), 29–64. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8705.00286.
[116]
Holm, L.E. 2013. Psychosis and the ineffable space of modernism. The Journal of Architecture. 18, 3 (Jun. 2013), 402–424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2013.808684.
[117]
Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. Verso.
[118]
Jameson, F. The Brick and the Balloon: Architecture, Idealism and Land Speculation. New Left Review. 228, 25–46.
[119]
Jane Randell 2012. Tendencies and Trajectories: Feminist Approaches in Architecture. The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. SAGE. 85–97.
[120]
Jane Rendell 2016. X Marks the Spot that Will Have Been. Architecture and the unconscious. Ashgate.
[121]
Judy Attfield 1994. The Tufted Carpet in Britain: Its Rise from the Bottom of the Pile, 1952-1970. Journal of Design History. 7, 3 (1994), 205–216.
[122]
Jyoti Hosagrahar 2012. ’Interrogating Difference: Postcolonial Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism. The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. SAGE. 70–84.
[123]
K. Michael Hays 1984. Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form. Perspecta. 21, (1984), 14–29.
[124]
Karen Bermann 1998. The House Behind. Places through the body. Routledge. 165–180.
[125]
Kate Nesbitt 1995. The Sublime and Modern Architecture: Unmasking (An Aesthetic of) Abstraction. New Literary History. 26, 1 (1995), 95–110.
[126]
Katherine Schonfield 2001. Dirt is matter out of place. Architecture: the subject is matter. Routledge. 30–43.
[127]
King, A.D. 2003. Actually existing postcolonialisms : colonial urbanism and architecture after the postcolonial turn. Postcolonial urbanism : Southeast Asian cities and global processes. Routledge. 167–183.
[128]
King, A.D. 1984. Introduction. The bungalow : the production of a global culture. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 1–13.
[129]
King, A.D. 2004. Spaces of global cultures: architecture, urbanism, identity. Routledge.
[130]
Kosofsky Sedgwick, E. 2003. Shame, Theatricality, and Queer Performativity: Henry James’s The Art of the Novel. Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press. 35–66.
[131]
Krivý, M. 2018. Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism: The smart city and the society of control. Planning Theory. 17, 1 (Feb. 2018), 8–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216645631.
[132]
Kusno, A. 2000. Behind the postcolonial: architecture, urban space, and political cultures in Indonesia. Routledge.
[133]
Lacan, J. et al. 1998. The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. Vintage.
[134]
Lacan, J. 2006. The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis. Ecrits: the first complete edition in English. W.W. Norton & Co. 197–268.
[135]
LaCapra, D. 2001. Writing history, writing trauma. Writing history, writing trauma. Johns Hopkins University Press. 1–42.
[136]
Lahiji, N. 2011. The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative. Ashgate.
[137]
Laplanche, J. 1998. Interpretation between Determinism and Hermeneutics. Essays on otherness. Routledge. 138–165.
[138]
Latour, B. 1993. Crisis. We have never been modern. Harvard University Press. 1–12.
[139]
Laura Mulvey 1996. Cinematic Space: Desiring and Deciphering. Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. Black Dog Publishing. 206–216.
[140]
Leach, A. 2010. Evidence. What is architectural history?. Polity. 76–96.
[141]
Leach, A. 2007. Manfredo Tafuri: choosing history. A&S Books.
[142]
Lloyd Thomas, K. 2013. Between the womb and the world: building matrixial relations in the NICU. Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. Routledge. 192–208.
[143]
Lloyd Thomas, K. Material matters : architecture and material practice / edited by Katie Lloyd Thomas.
[144]
Lydia Martens 2007. The visible and the invisible: (De)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. I.B. Tauris. 34–48.
[145]
Mario Carpo 2003. Drawing with Numbers: Geometry and Numeracy in Early Modern Architectural Design. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians. 62, 4 (2003), 448–469.
[146]
Mario Carpo 2011. The Photograph and the Blueprint. Notes on the end of some indices. Das Auge der Architektur : zur Frage der Bildlichkeit in der Baukunst / Andreas Beyer, Matteo Burioni, Johannes Grave (Hg.). Andreas Bayer, ed. Wilhelm Fink Verlag. 467–482.
[147]
Marshall Brown Undisciplined Reading: Heinrich Wolfflin’s Passions. Critical Inquiry. 44, 733–744.
[148]
Martin, R. 2010. Utopia’s ghost: architecture and postmodernism, again. University of Minnesota Press.
[149]
Mary Douglas 2002. Introduction. Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. Routledge. 1–7.
[150]
Matrix (Organization) 1984. Making space: women and the man-made environment. Pluto Press.
[151]
Mbembe, A. 2004. Writing the World from an African Metropolis. Public Culture. 16, 3 (Oct. 2004), 347–372. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-3-347.
[152]
Meredith TenHoor 1AD. Architecture and Biopolitics at Les Halles. French Politics, Culture & Society. 25, 2 (1AD), 73–92.
[153]
Miller, D. 2001. Possessions. Home possessions : material culture behind closed doors. Berg. 107–121.
[154]
Mills, R. 2006. Queer is Here? Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Histories and Public Culture. History Workshop Journal. 62, 1 (Jan. 2006), 253–263. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbl006.
[155]
Moore-Gilbert, B. J. 1997. Postcolonial theory: contexts, practices, politics. Verso.
[156]
Mulvey, L. 1992. Pandora: topographies of the mask and curiosity. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press. 53–71.
[157]
Nalbantoglu Gulsum Baydar 1997. Limits of (in)tolerance: The carved dwelling in the architectural discourse of modern Turkey. Postcolonial space(s). Princeton Architectural Press.
[158]
Nalbantoglu, Gülsüm Baydar and Wong, Chong Thai 1997. Postcolonial space(s). Princeton Architectural Press.
[159]
Nathan Moore 2013. Diagramming control. Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. Routledge. 56–70.
[160]
Nietzsche, F.W. 1994. On the utility and liability of history for life (Sections 1-3). Unfashionable observations. Stanford University Press. 87–108.
[161]
Peg Rawes et al. 2016. Introduction. Poetic biopolitics: practices of relation in architecture and the arts. P. Rawes et al., eds. I.B. Tauris. 1–7.
[162]
Peg Rawes 2015. Spinoza’s geometric Ecologies. The politics of parametricism: digital technologies in architecture. M. Poole and M. Shvartzerg, eds. Bloomsbury Academic.
[163]
Peggy Dreamer 2015. Parametric Schizophrenia. The politics of parametricism: digital technologies in architecture. M. Poole and M. Shvartzerg, eds. Bloomsbury Academic. 178–188.
[164]
Penner, B. 2009. (Re)Designing the "Unmentionable”: Female Toilets in the Twentieth Century from Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender. Ladies and gents: public toilets and gender. Temple University Press. 141–150.
[165]
Petit, E. ed. 2015. Reckoning with Colin Rowe: ten architects take position. Routledge.
[166]
Petrescu, D. 2007. Altering practices. Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space. Routledge. 1–14.
[167]
Petrescu, D. Gardeners of commons, for the most part, women. Relational Architectural Ecologies. 261–276.
[168]
Pilkey, B. et al. eds. 2017. Sexuality and gender at home: experience, politics, transgression. Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
[169]
Plant, S. 1997. Zeros + ones: women, cyberspace + the new technoculture. Fourth Estate.
[170]
Rawes, P. 2007. Chapter 7 Bridges, Envelopes and Horizons. Irigaray for architects. Routledge. 75–88.
[171]
Rawes, P. 2007. Irigaray for architects. Routledge.
[172]
Rendell, J. 2007. Critical architecture. Routledge.
[173]
Rendell, J. 1998. Doing it, (Un)Doing it, (Over)Doing it Yourself: Rhetorics of Architectural Abuse. Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. Routledge. 229–246.
[174]
Rendell, J. 2000. Introduction: Gender, Space, Architecture. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 225–239.
[175]
Rendell, J. 1996. Subjective Space: a feminist architectural history of the Burlington Arcade. Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. Black Dog Publishing. 216–233.
[176]
Rendell, J. 2017. The architecture of psychoanalysis: spaces of transition. I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
[177]
Rendell, J. 2002. The pursuit of pleasure: gender, space & architecture in Regency London. Athlone.
[178]
Researching female public toilets: gendered spaces, disciplinary limits: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol6/iss2/6/.
[179]
Riemer, J.W. 1977. Varieties of Opportunistic Research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 5, 4 (Jan. 1977), 467–477. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/089124167700500405.
[180]
Rose, N. 1999. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. Free Association.
[181]
Rose, Nikolas S. 2007. Politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton University Press.
[182]
Rüedi, K. et al. 1996. Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. Black Dog Publishing.
[183]
Runting, H. and Frichot, H. 2015. Welcome to The Promenade City: A Gentri-Fictional Cartography of Stockholm in the Postindustrial Age. Architecture and Culture. 3, 3 (Sep. 2015), 397–411. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/20507828.2015.1082056.
[184]
Said, Edward W. 1993. Culture and imperialism. Chatto and Windus.
[185]
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. Vintage Books.
[186]
Sanford Kwinter The ‘avant-garde’ in America (or The fallacy of misplaced concreteness). Far from equilibrium: essays on technology and design culture. Actar-D. 74–89.
[187]
Sarah Ahmed 2017. Brick Walls. Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
[188]
Scriver, P. and Prakash, V. 2007. Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon.
[189]
Sengupta, T. 2012. Between country and city: fluid spaces of provincial administrative towns in nineteenth-century Bengal. Urban History. 39, 1 (Feb. 2012), 56–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926811000782.
[190]
Sengupta, T. 2013. Living in the periphery: provinciality and domestic space in colonial Bengal. The Journal of Architecture. 18, 6 (Dec. 2013), 905–943. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2013.853683.
[191]
Serres, M. and Latour, B. 1995. First conversation : background and training. Conversations on science, culture, and time. University of Michigan Press. 1–42.
[192]
Shonfield, K. 1998. Glossing with graininess: cross occupations in postwar British film and architecture. The Journal of Architecture. 3, 4 (Jan. 1998), 355–375. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/136023698374134.
[193]
Sigmund Freud 1964. Constructions in analysis. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 23: (1937-1939). The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis. 255–269.
[194]
Spivak, G.C. 1999. A critique of postcolonial reason: toward a history of the vanishing present. Harvard University Press.
[195]
Stanford Anderson 2002. Quasi-Autonomy in Architecture: The Search for an ‘In-Between’. Perspecta. 33, (2002), 30–37.
[196]
Stephen Cairns 2007. Chapter 3: The Stone Books of Orientalism. Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon. Routledge. 51–65.
[197]
Stern, R. 1980. The Doubles of Post-Modern. The Harvard Architectural Review. 1, (1980), 75–87.
[198]
Stiegler, Bernard 1998. Technics and time: 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford University Press.
[199]
Stratigakos, D. 2008. The good architect and the bad parent: on the formation and disruption of a canonical image. The Journal of Architecture. 13, 3 (Jun. 2008), 283–296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13602360802216971.
[200]
Susan Stryker 2008. An introduction to transgender terms and concepts. Transgender History. Seal.
[201]
Tafuri, M. 1976. Reason’s adventures: naturalism and the city in the century of the enlightenment. Architecture and utopia: design and capitalist development. M.I.T. Press. 1–40.
[202]
Tafuri, M. 1998. Toward a Critique of Architectural Ideology. Architecture theory since 1968. MIT. 2–35.
[203]
The Ego and the Id: http://www.pep-web.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/document.php?id=se.019.0001a#p0048.
[204]
The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History : SAGE Knowledge: http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_historicaltheory/n7.xml.
[205]
Thomas Lemke 2011. Introduction & The Government of Living Beings: Michel Foucault. Biopolitics: an advanced introduction. New York University Press. 1-8-33–52.
[206]
Thompson, E.P. 1978. The poverty of theory, or An orrery of errors, Section VII. The poverty of theory and other essays. Merlin Press. 229–242.
[207]
Urbach, H. 2000. Closets, clothes, disClosure. Gender space architecture : an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 342–352.
[208]
Virilio, Paul and Rose, Julie 1997. Open sky. Verso.
[209]
W. Haver 1997. Queer research; or, how to practice invention to the brink of intelligibility. The eight technologies of otherness. S. Golding, ed. Routledge.
[210]
Walker, L. 2000. Women in architecture. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 244–257.
[211]
Wallach Scott, J. 2000. Excerpts from ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’. Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. Routledge. 74–87.
[212]
Walsh, W.H. 1967. What is philosophy of history? An introduction to philosophy of history. Hutchinson. 11–29.
[213]
Walter Benjamin 1999. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Illuminations. Pimlico. 211–235.
[214]
Warner, M. 1999. The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. Harvard University Press.
[215]
White, P. 1992. Female Spectator, Lesbian Specter: The Haunting. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press.
[216]
Wilson, E.A. 2015. Depression, Biology, Aggression: Introduction to Gut Feminism. Feminism, Theory, Technoscience. 1, 1 (Sep. 2015), 1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v1i1.28812.
[217]
Wolfflin, E. 1967. Renaissance and Baroque - Parts I and II. Renaissance and Baroque. Cornell University Press. 29–88.
[218]
Wright, G. 1991. The politics of design in French colonial urbanism. University of Chicago Press.
[219]
Zeynep Çelik 2000. Colonialism, Orientalism, and the Canon. Intersections: architectural histories and critical theories. Routledge. 161–169.
