1
Borden I, Rendell J. From chamber to transformer: epistemological challenges in the methodology of theorised architectural history. The Journal of Architecture 2000;5:215–28. doi:10.1080/136023600408719
2
Carr EH. Ch. 2: Society and the individual. In: What is history? Basingstoke: : Palgrave 2001. 25–49.
3
Leach A. Evidence. In: What is architectural history? Cambridge: : Polity 2010. 76–96.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8277803b-6836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
4
Hayden White. The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory. History and Theory 1984;23:1–33.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2504969
5
Thompson EP. The poverty of theory, or An orrery of errors, Section VII. In: The poverty of theory and other essays. London: : Merlin Press 1978. 229–42.
6
Chakrabarty D. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 2009;35:197–222. doi:10.1086/596640
7
Culler J. Introduction: What’s the Point? In: The Point of theory: practices of cultural analysis. Amsterdam: : Amsterdam University Press 1994.
8
Dorrian M. Criticism, negation, action. The Journal of Architecture 2005;10:229–33. doi:10.1080/13602360500162477
9
Walsh WH. What is philosophy of history? In: An introduction to philosophy of history. London: : Hutchinson 1967. 11–29.
10
Nietzsche FW. On the utility and liability of history for life (Sections 1-3). In: Unfashionable observations. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1994. 87–108.
11
Doran R. The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History : SAGE Knowledge. Part I: Foundations: Theoretical Frameworks for Knowledge of the Past Chapter 1: The Turn towards ‘Science’: Historians Delivering Untheorized Truth Chapter 2: The Implications of Empiricism for History Chapter 3: The Case for Historical Imagination: Defending the Human Factor and Narrative Chapter 4: The Annales School: Variations on Realism, Methods and Time Chapter 5: Intellectual History: From Ideas to Meanings Chapter 6: Social History: A New Kind of History Chapter 7: The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration, and the Writing of History Chapter 8: The Work of Hayden White II: Defamiliarizing Narrative Chapter 9: Derrida and Deconstruction: Challenges to the Transparency of Language Chapter 10: The Return of Rhetoric Chapter 11: Michel Foucault: The Unconscious of History and Culture Chapter 12: History as Text: Narrative Theory and History Chapter 13: The Boundaries of History and Fiction Part II: Applications: Theory-Intensive Areas of History Chapter 14: The Newest Social History: Crisis and Renewal Chapter 15: Women’s History/Feminist History Chapter 16: Gender I: From Women’s History to Gender History Chapter 17: Gender II: Masculinity Acquires a History Chapter 18: Sexuality and History Chapter 19: Psychoanalysis and the Making of History Chapter 20: New National Narratives Chapter 21: Cultural Studies and History Chapter 22: Memory: Witness, Experience, Collective Meaning Chapter 23: Postcolonial Theory and History Part III: Coda. Post-postmodernism: Directions and Interrogations Chapter 24: Post-positivist Realism: Regrounding Representation Chapter 25: Historical Experience beyond the Linguistic Turn Chapter 26: Photographs: Reading the Image for History Chapter 27: Digital Information: ‘Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom …’ is Digital a Cultural Revolution? Chapter 28: Recovering the Self: Agency after Deconstruction Chapter 29: The Fundamental Things Apply: Aristotle’s Narrative Theory and the Classical Origins of Postmodern History Previous Entry Next Entry Text size Chapter 7: The Work of Hayden White I: Mimesis, Figuration and the Writing of History. http://knowledge.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/hdbk_historicaltheory/n7.xml
12
LaCapra D. Writing history, writing trauma. In: Writing history, writing trauma. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press 2001. 1–42.
13
Laplanche J. Interpretation between Determinism and Hermeneutics. In: Essays on otherness. London: : Routledge 1998. 138–65.
14
de Cetreau M. Psychoanalysis and its History. In: Heterologies: discourse on the other. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 1986. 3–16.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bcd6a4b8-08fc-ee11-8076-0050f2f05a7b
15
Ahmed S. Queer phenomenology: orientations, objects, others. Durham, [N.C.]: : Duke University Press 2006. https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/1065/Queer-PhenomenologyOrientations-Objects-Others
16
Sarah Ahmed. Brick Walls. In: Living a feminist life. Durham: : Duke University Press 2017. doi:10.1215/9780822373377-009?locatt=mode:legacy
17
Bermann K. The house behind. In: Places through the body. London: : Routledge 1998. 165–80.
18
Butler J. Subjects of sex, gender, desire. In: Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: : Routledge 2006. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8a0ef3d0-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
19
Burns K. A Girl’s Own Adventure. Journal of Architectural Education 2012;65:125–34. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2011.01187.x
20
Agrest, Diana, Conway, Patricia, Weisman, Leslie. The sex of architecture. New York: : Harry N. Abrams 1996.
21
Agrest D. Architecture from without: body logic and sex. In: Theorizing a new agenda for architecture: an anthology of architectural theory 1965-1995. New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1996. 541–53.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6ee691d9-0651-ef11-991a-ebf013606e83
22
Karen Bermann. The House Behind. In: Places through the body. London: : Routledge 1998. 165–80.
23
Betsky A. Queer space: architecture and same-sex desire. New York: : William Morrow & Co 1997.
24
Bonnevier K. Behind straight curtains: towards a queer feminist theory of architecture. Stockholm: : Axl Books 2007.
25
Ben Campkin. Queer Urban Imaginaries. In: Lindner C, Meissner M, eds. The Routledge Companion to Urban Imaginaries. Boca Raton, FL: : Routledge 2018. 407–23.https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315163956
26
Brown LA. Introduction. In: Feminist practices: interdisciplinary approaches to women in architecture. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011. 1–15.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cadf895b-7b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
27
Burns K. Ex libris: Archaeologies of Feminism, Architecture and Deconstruction. Architectural Theory Review 2010;15:242–65. doi:10.1080/13264826.2010.524706
28
Coleman D. Introduction from ‘Architecture and feminism’. In: Architecture and feminism. New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1996. ix–xvi.
29
Colomina B, Bloomer J. Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992.
30
Stratigakos D. The good architect and the bad parent: on the formation and disruption of a canonical image. The Journal of Architecture 2008;13:283–96. doi:10.1080/13602360802216971
31
Durning ML, Wrigley R. Gender and architecture. Chichester: : Wiley 2000.
32
Frichot H, Gabrielsson C, Runting H, editors. Architecture and feminisms: ecologies, economies, technologies. New York: : Routledge 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203729717
33
Frichot H. Creative ecologies: theorizing the practice of architecture. London: : Bloomsbury Visual Arts 2018. https://www-bloomsburyarchitecturelibrary-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/encyclopedia?docid=b-9781350036550
34
Frichot H. Following Hélène Cixous’ Steps Towards A Writing Architecture. Architectural Theory Review 2010;15:312–23. doi:10.1080/13264826.2010.524310
35
Amin Ghaziani, Matt Brim, editors. Imagining Queer Methods. New York: : NYU Press 2019.
36
W. Haver. Queer research; or, how to practice invention to the brink of intelligibility. In: S. Golding, ed. The eight technologies of otherness. London: : Routledge 1997. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203440230
37
Hayden D. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : MIT Press 1981.
38
Dirk van den Heuvel, Robert Gorny, editors. Trans-Bodies / Queering (Footprint Self Architecture Theory Journal). 2017;11.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/footprint/issue/view/567
39
Rüedi K, Wigglesworth S, McCorquodale D. Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. London: : Black Dog Publishing 1996.
40
Matrix (Organization). Making space: women and the man-made environment. London: : Pluto Press 1984.
41
Mills R. Queer is Here? Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Histories and Public Culture. History Workshop Journal 2006;62:253–63. doi:10.1093/hwj/dbl006
42
Browne K, Nash CJ, editors. Queer methods and methodologies: intersecting queer theories and social science research. London, [England]: : Routledge 2016. https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/29922
43
Penner B. Researching female public toilets: gendered spaces, disciplinary limits. http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol6/iss2/6/
44
Petrescu D. Gardeners of commons, for the most part, women. In: Relational Architectural Ecologies.261–76.http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203770283
45
Petrescu D. Altering practices. In: Altering practices: feminist politics and poetics of space. London: : Routledge 2007. 1–14.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8d9b88a5-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
46
Pilkey B, Scicluna RM, Campkin B, et al., editors. Sexuality and gender at home: experience, politics, transgression. London: : Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc 2017. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/monograph?docid=b-9781474239653
47
Griselda Pollock. Modernity and the Spaces of Femininity. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134692064
48
Rawes P. Irigaray for architects. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007.
49
Rendell J. Subjective Space: a feminist architectural history of the Burlington Arcade. In: Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. London: : Black Dog Publishing 1996. 216–33.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7b8fc36c-3b48-ef11-991a-ebf013606e83
50
Rendell J. Doing it, (Un)Doing it, (Over)Doing it Yourself: Rhetorics of Architectural Abuse. In: Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. London: : Routledge 1998. 229–46. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203983829
51
Rendell J. Introduction: Gender, Space, Architecture. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 225–39.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134692064
52
Rendell J. The pursuit of pleasure: gender, space & architecture in Regency London. London: : Athlone 2002. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=564195
53
Jane Randell. Tendencies and Trajectories: Feminist Approaches in Architecture. In: The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012. 85–97.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14424236330004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
54
Kosofsky Sedgwick E. Shame, Theatricality, and Queer Performativity: Henry James’s The Art of the Novel. In: Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2003. 35–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384786
55
Susan Stryker. An introduction to transgender terms and concepts. In: Transgender History. Berkley: : Seal 2008. https://search-alexanderstreet-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cbibliographic_details%7C2033373#page/12/mode/1/chapter/bibliographic_entity%7Cdocument%7C2033381
56
Urbach H. Closets, clothes, disClosure. In: Gender space architecture : an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 342–52.
57
Walker L. Women in architecture. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 244–57.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134692064
58
Wallach Scott J. Excerpts from ‘Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis’. In: Gender space architecture: an interdisciplinary introduction. London: : Routledge 2000. 74–87.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134692064
59
Warner M. The trouble with normal: sex, politics, and the ethics of queer life. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
60
White P. Female Spectator, Lesbian Specter: The Haunting. In: Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992.
61
Buchli V, Lucas G, Cox M. The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth-century British council house. In: Victor Buchli, Gavin Lucas, eds. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: : Routledge 2001. 158–68.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d87839a8-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
62
Mary Douglas. Introduction. In: Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. London: : Routledge 2002. 1–7.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=43e9c188-d1e9-e911-80cd-005056af4099
63
Douglas M. Chapter 2 - Secular defilement. In: Purity and danger: an analysis of concept of pollution and taboo. London: : Routledge 2002. 36–50.
64
Forty A. Chapter 7 - Hygiene and Cleanliness. In: Objects of desire: design and society since 1750. London: : Thames and Hudson 1986. 156–81.
65
Buchli V, Lucas G. The archaeology of alienation : a late twentieth-century British council house. In: Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: : Routledge 2001. 158–67.
66
Judy Attfield. The Tufted Carpet in Britain: Its Rise from the Bottom of the Pile, 1952-1970. Journal of Design History 1994;7:205–16.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1316116
67
Attfield, Judy. Wild things: the material culture of everyday life. Oxford: : Berg 2000.
68
Bender B. Landscape and politics. In: The material culture reader. Oxford: : Berg 2002. 135–74.
69
Buchli V. Architecture and the domestic sphere. In: The material culture reader. Oxford: : Berg 2002. 207–13.
70
Campkin B. Ornament from grime: David Adjaye’s Dirty House, the architectural ‘aesthetic of recycling’ and the Gritty Brits. The Journal of Architecture 2007;12:367–92. doi:10.1080/13602360701614649
71
Campkin B. Placing "Matter Out Of Place”: Purity and Danger as Evidence for Architecture and Urbanism. Architectural Theory Review 2013;18:46–61. doi:10.1080/13264826.2013.785579
72
Fardon R. Citations out of place, or, Lord Palmerston goes viral in the nineteenth century but gets lost in the twentieth. Anthropology Today 2013;29:25–7. doi:10.1111/1467-8322.12007
73
Lydia Martens. The visible and the invisible: (De)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. In: Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. London: : I.B. Tauris 2007. 34–48.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma990020863730204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Dirt:%20new%20geographies%20of%20cleanliness%20and%20contamination&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9072258131107472785&offset=0
74
B. Campkin, R. Cox. The visible and invisible: (de|)regulation in contemporary cleaning practices. In: Dirt: new geographies of cleanliness and contamination. London: : I.B. Tauris 2007. 34–48.
75
Daniel Miller. Behind closed doors. In: Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: : Berg 2001. 1–19.
76
Miller D. Possessions. In: Home possessions : material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: : Berg 2001. 107–21.
77
Penner B. (Re)Designing the "Unmentionable”: Female Toilets in the Twentieth Century from Ladies and Gents: Public Toilets and Gender. In: Ladies and gents: public toilets and gender. Philadelphia: : Temple University Press 2009. 141–50.https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt14btdn9.14?seq=1
78
Riemer JW. Varieties of Opportunistic Research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 1977;5:467–77. doi:10.1177/089124167700500405
79
Shonfield K. Glossing with graininess: cross occupations in postwar British film and architecture. The Journal of Architecture 1998;3:355–75. doi:10.1080/136023698374134
80
Katherine Schonfield. Dirt is matter out of place. In: Architecture: the subject is matter. London: : Routledge 2001. 30–43. doi:10.4324/9781315011356
81
E. Shove. Constructing home: a crossroads of choice. In: At home: an anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse, N.Y.: : Syracuse University Press 1999. 130–43.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ea239597-a59f-ec11-a22a-0050f2f0d45d
82
Chakrabarty D. Postcolonialism and the Artifice of History. In: Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2008. 27–46.https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rsx9
83
Achile Mbembe. Decolonising Knowledge and the Question of the Archive. 2015.https://worldpece.org/content/mbembe-achille-2015-%E2%80%9Cdecolonizing-knowledge-and-question-archive%E2%80%9D-africa-country
84
Hartman S. The Anarchy of Colored Girls Assembled in a Riotous Manner. South Atlantic Quarterly 2018;117:465–90. doi:10.1215/00382876-6942093
85
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Can the Subaltern Speak. In: The post-colonial studies reader. London: : Routledge 2006. 28–37.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e841abe7-3736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
86
Chattopadhyay S. Blurring Boundaries: The Limits of ‘White Town’ in Colonial Calcutta. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 2000;59:154–79. doi:10.2307/991588
87
Stephen Cairns. Chapter 3: The Stone Books of Orientalism. In: Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon. London: : Routledge 2007. 51–65.
88
Zeynep Çelik. Colonialism, Orientalism, and the Canon. In: Intersections: architectural histories and critical theories. London: : Routledge 2000. 161–9.
89
Çelik, Zeynep. Urban forms and colonial confrontations: Algiers under French rule. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1997. https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/ws859g31f
90
Chakrabarty D. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Reissue, with a new preface by the author. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2008. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rsx9
91
Crinson M. Modern architecture and the end of empire. Aldershot, Hants, England: : Ashgate 2003.
92
Fraser M, Kerr J. Architecture and the ‘special relationship’: the American influence on post-war British architecture. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007.
93
Hernández F. The transcultural phenomenon, and the transculturation of architecture. The Journal of Romance Studies 2002;2:1–15. doi:10.3828/jrs.2.3.1
94
Hernández F. Bhabha for architects. London: : Routledge 2010. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203855935
95
Jyoti Hosagrahar. ’Interrogating Difference: Postcolonial Perspectives in Architecture and Urbanism. In: The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012. 70–84. doi:10.4135/9781446201756
96
King AD. Introduction. In: The bungalow : the production of a global culture. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1984. 1–13.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=52345d44-3116-e811-80cd-005056af4099
97
King AD. Actually existing postcolonialisms : colonial urbanism and architecture after the postcolonial turn. In: Postcolonial urbanism : Southeast Asian cities and global processes. London: : Routledge 2003. 167–83.
98
Anthony D. King. Towards a Theory of Colonial Urban Development. In: Colonial urban development: culture, social power and environment. London: : Routledge and Kegan Paul 1976. 22–40.
99
King AD. Spaces of global cultures: architecture, urbanism, identity. London: : Routledge 2004.
100
Kusno A. Behind the postcolonial: architecture, urban space, and political cultures in Indonesia. London: : Routledge 2000.
101
Angela Last. Internationalisation and Interdisciplinarity: Sharing across Boundaries? In: Bhambra GK, Gebrial D, Nisancıolu K, eds. Decolonising the University. London: : Pluto Press 2018. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=5031235280004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
102
Moore-Gilbert, B. J. Postcolonial theory: contexts, practices, politics. London: : Verso 1997.
103
Nalbantoglu, Gülsüm Baydar, Wong, Chong Thai. Postcolonial space(s). New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1997.
104
Nalbantoglu Gulsum Baydar. Limits of (in)tolerance: The carved dwelling in the architectural discourse of modern Turkey. In: Postcolonial space(s). New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1997.
105
Said, Edward W. Orientalism. 1st Vintage Books ed. New York: : Vintage Books 1979.
106
Edward Said. Orientalism. The post-colonial studies reader 2006;:24–7.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d13e3f8e-5436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
107
Said, Edward W. Culture and imperialism. London: : Chatto and Windus 1993.
108
Sengupta T. Between country and city: fluid spaces of provincial administrative towns in nineteenth-century Bengal. Urban History 2012;39:56–82. doi:10.1017/S0963926811000782
109
Sengupta T. Living in the periphery: provinciality and domestic space in colonial Bengal. The Journal of Architecture 2013;18:905–43. doi:10.1080/13602365.2013.853683
110
Scriver P, Prakash V. Colonial modernities: building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon. London: 2007. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9780203964262
111
Spivak GC. A critique of postcolonial reason: toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999.
112
Wright G. The politics of design in French colonial urbanism. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
113
Evans R. Translations from drawing to building. In: Translations from drawing to building and other essays. London: : Architectural Association 1997. 153–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5e8148f9-8d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
114
Colomina B. Archive. In: Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1996. 1–15.
115
Colomina B. Interior. In: Privacy and publicity : modern architecture as mass media. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1996. 232–81.
116
Banham PR. Oases and resorts. In: Scenes in America deserta. London: : Thames and Hudson 1982. 21–44.
117
Banham PR. The eye of the beholder. In: Scenes in America deserta. London: : Thames and Hudson 1982. 209–28.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7a2b86f1-5736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
118
Forty A. Design. In: Words and buildings: a vocabulary of modern architecture. London: : Thames & Hudson 2000. 136–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4f82665a-5836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
119
Barthes R. Myth Today. In: Mythologies / Roland Barthes ; selected and translated from the French by Annette Lavers.
120
Bonta JP. From Written Dissemination to Text Analysis. In: Architecture and its interpretation: a study of expressive systems in architecture. London: : Lund Humphries 1979. 175–224.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=efe7e5c1-033e-ef11-991a-83715e08fca8
121
Carpo M. Prologue : architectural culture and technological context. In: Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001. 1–15.
122
Carpo M. Architectural drawing in the age of its mechanical reproduction : Serlio. In: Architecture in the age of printing : orality, writing, typography, and printed images in the history of architectural theory. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2001. 42–56.https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/monographs/cn69m449x
123
Eco U. Function and sign : the semiotics of architecture. In: Rethinking architecture : a reader in cultural theory. London: : Routledge 1997. 182–202.
124
Fraser M. Introduction. In: Design research in architecture: an overview. Farnham: : Ashgate 2013. 1–14.
125
Hill J. Design research: the first 500 years. In: Design research in architecture: an overview. Farnham: : Ashgate 2013. 15–34.
126
Banham R. A Home is not a House. Art in America 1965;2:70–9.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20072241-3e59-ee11-830d-0050f2f06092
127
Giedion S. The Assembly Line and Scientific Management. In: Mechanization takes command: a contribution to anonymous history.79–121.https://www-fulcrum-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/concern/monographs/3484zh00p
128
Krivý M. Towards a critique of cybernetic urbanism: The smart city and the society of control. Planning Theory 2018;17:8–30. doi:10.1177/1473095216645631
129
Latour B. Crisis. In: We have never been modern. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1993. 1–12.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d8c3609d-6036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
130
Lloyd Thomas K. Between the womb and the world: building matrixial relations in the NICU. In: Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. London: : Routledge 2013. 192–208.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e9b9167b-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
131
Allen B. The Technical. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7v967.6
132
Walter Benjamin. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In: Illuminations. London: : Pimlico 1999. 211–35.
133
Bijsterveld K. Infernal din, heavenly tunes : repertoires of dramatizing sound. In: Mechanical sound : technology, culture, and public problems of noise in the twentieth century. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2008. 27–51.
134
Braidotti R. Transpositions: on nomadic ethics. Cambridge: : Polity 2006.
135
Bressani M. Viollet-le-Ducs’s optic. In: Architecture and the sciences : exchanging metaphors. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University School of Architecture 2003. 119–39.
136
Brown N. Immortality by Design. Parallax 2008;14:4–20. doi:10.1080/13534640802159096
137
Mario Carpo. Drawing with Numbers: Geometry and Numeracy in Early Modern Architectural Design. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 2003;62:448–69.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592497
138
Mario Carpo. The Photograph and the Blueprint. Notes on the end of some indices. In: Andreas Bayer, ed. Das Auge der Architektur : zur Frage der Bildlichkeit in der Baukunst / Andreas Beyer, Matteo Burioni, Johannes Grave (Hg.). Munich: : Wilhelm Fink Verlag 2011. 467–82.https://www.brill.com/view/title/48867
139
Feenberg A. Technology, philosophy, politics. In: Questioning technology. London: : Routledge 1999. 1–17.
140
Galison, Peter, 1955-; Thompson, Emily Ann. The architecture of science. MIT Press 1999. http://quod.lib.umich.edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb08330.0001.001
141
Arie Graafland, Heidi Sohn. Introduction: Science and virtuality. In: The SAGE handbook of architectural theory. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2012. 467–83.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781848600393
142
Haraway DJ. The Haraway reader. New York: : Routledge 2004.
143
Heidegger M. The question concerning technology. In: The question concerning technology, and other essays. London: : Harper & Row 1977. 3–35.
144
Sanford Kwinter. The ‘avant-garde’ in America (or The fallacy of misplaced concreteness). In: Far from equilibrium: essays on technology and design culture. Barcelona: : Actar-D 74–89.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1ad6bd5d-2f16-e811-80cd-005056af4099
145
Lloyd Thomas K. Material matters : architecture and material practice / edited by Katie Lloyd Thomas. http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203013625
146
Plant S. Zeros + ones: women, cyberspace + the new technoculture. London: : Fourth Estate 1997.
147
Peg Rawes. Spinoza’s geometric Ecologies. In: Poole M, Shvartzerg M, eds. The politics of parametricism: digital technologies in architecture. London, England: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/reader.action?docID=2080895&ppg=230
148
Rawes P. Chapter 7 Bridges, Envelopes and Horizons. In: Irigaray for architects. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007. 75–88.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3d7c94cd-fea8-ec11-a99b-0050f2f06092
149
Serres M, Latour B. First conversation : background and training. In: Conversations on science, culture, and time. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 1995. 1–42.
150
Stiegler, Bernard. Technics and time: 1: The fault of Epimetheus. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1998.
151
Virilio, Paul, Rose, Julie. Open sky. London: : Verso 1997.
152
Harrison G, Clifford B. ‘The field of grain is gone; It’s now a Tesco Superstore’: representations of ‘urban’ and ‘rural’ within historical and contemporary discourses opposing urban expansion in England. Planning Perspectives 2016;31:585–609. doi:10.1080/02665433.2015.1103197
153
Heynen H. Architecture as critique of modernity. In: Architecture and modernity: a critique. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT 1999. 148, 249-218,258.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=04f14145-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
154
Tafuri M. Reason’s adventures: naturalism and the city in the century of the enlightenment. In: Architecture and utopia: design and capitalist development. Cambridge, Mass: : M.I.T. Press 1976. 1–40.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=26d56ebf-705b-ee11-830d-0050f2f05a7b
155
Stanford Anderson. Quasi-Autonomy in Architecture: The Search for an ‘In-Between’. Perspecta 2002;33:30–7.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1567294?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
156
Aureli PV, Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture. The project of autonomy: politics and architecture within and against capitalism. New York: : Princeton Architectural 2008.
157
Baird G. ‘Criticality’ and its discontents. http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/21/criticality-and-its-discontents
158
Marshall Brown. Undisciplined Reading: Heinrich Wolfflin’s Passions. Critical Inquiry;44:733–44.https://www-journals-uchicago-edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/10.1086/698182
159
Colquhoun A. Essays in architectural criticism: modern architecture and historical change. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1981.
160
Eisenman P. Autonomy and the Will to the Critical. In: Written into the void: selected writings, 1990-2004. New Haven: : Yale University Press 2007. 94–9.https://aaeportal.com/?id=-31877
161
K. Michael Hays. Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form. Perspecta 1984;21:14–29.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/1567078?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
162
Hays KM. Architecture’s desire: reading the late avant-garde. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2010.
163
Heynen H. What belongs to architecture?’ Avant-garde ideas in the modern movement. The Journal of Architecture 1999;4:129–47. doi:10.1080/136023699373882
164
H. Heynen. About histories and theory. The Journal of Architecture 2002;7:205–20. doi:10.1080/13602360210153656
165
Jameson F. Postmodernism, or, The cultural logic of late capitalism. London: : Verso 1991.
166
Jameson F. The Brick and the Balloon: Architecture, Idealism and Land Speculation. New Left Review;:25–46.http://newleftreview.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/I/228/fredric-jameson-the-brick-and-the-balloon-architecture-idealism-and-land-speculation
167
Lahiji N. The political unconscious of architecture: re-opening Jameson’s narrative. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011.
168
Leach A. Manfredo Tafuri: choosing history. Ghent: : A&S Books 2007.
169
Martin R. Utopia’s ghost: architecture and postmodernism, again. Minneapolis, Minn: : University of Minnesota Press 2010. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780816673698/
170
Kate Nesbitt. The Sublime and Modern Architecture: Unmasking (An Aesthetic of) Abstraction. New Literary History 1995;26:95–110.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/20057270?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
171
Petit E, editor. Reckoning with Colin Rowe: ten architects take position. New York, NY: : Routledge 2015.
172
Rendell J. Critical architecture. London: : Routledge 2007. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945667
173
Tafuri M. Toward a Critique of Architectural Ideology. In: Architecture theory since 1968. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT 1998. 2–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1e6197df-953f-ef11-991a-83715e08fca8
174
Wolfflin E. Renaissance and Baroque - Parts I and II. In: Renaissance and Baroque. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1967. 29–88.
175
Stern R. The Doubles of Post-Modern. The Harvard Architectural Review 1980;1:75–87.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c9446094-073e-ef11-991a-83715e08fca8
176
De Block G. Ecological infrastructure in a critical-historical perspective: From engineering ‘social’ territory to encoding ‘natural’ topography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 2016;48:367–90. doi:10.1177/0308518X15600719
177
Foucault M. Ch. 5: Lecture 8 February 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. In: Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. 115–30.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780230245075
178
Foucault M. Ch. 13: Lecture 5 April 1978 from Security, Territory, Population. In: Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2007. 333–58.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780230245075
179
Foucault M, Senellart M. Course Summary and context from The birth of biopolitics. In: The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. 317–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=559abeef-7936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
180
Meredith TenHoor. Architecture and Biopolitics at Les Halles. French Politics, Culture & Society 1AD;25:73–92.
181
Agamben, Giorgio. Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, Calif: : Stanford University Press 1998. https://search.alexanderstreet.com/view/work/bibliographic_entity%7Cbibliographic_details%7C4714514
182
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant matter: a political ecology of things. Durham [N.C.]: : Duke University Press 2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv111jh6w
183
Butler, Judith. Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. London: : Verso 2004. https://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781839763038
184
Braidotti R. Posthuman Relational Subjectivity. In: Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity.21–39.http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203770283
185
Campbell, Timothy C. Improper life: technology and biopolitics from Heidegger to Agamben. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2011. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttth0h
186
Clough P, Willse C. Beyond Biopolitics: Essays on Governance of Life and Death. 2011. doi:10.1215/9780822394235
187
Foucault M, Senellart M, Collège de France. Course Summary and context. In: The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2008. 317–31.http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9780230594180
188
Hauptmann D, Neidich W. Introduction: Architecture and mind in the age of communication and information. In: Cognitive architecture: from biopolitics to noopolitics : architecture & mind in the age of communication and information. Rotterdam: : 010 Publishers 2010. 10–43.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=120445f6-e648-ef11-991a-ebf013606e83
189
Mbembe A. Writing the World from an African Metropolis. Public Culture 2004;16:347–72. doi:10.1215/08992363-16-3-347
190
Foucault M, Hutton PH, Martin LH, et al. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. London: : Tavistock 1988.
191
Nathan Moore. Diagramming control. In: Relational architectural ecologies: architecture, nature and subjectivity. London: : Routledge 2013. 56–70.https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135037222
192
Thomas Lemke. Introduction & The Government of Living Beings: Michel Foucault. In: Biopolitics: an advanced introduction. New York: : New York University Press 2011. 1-8-33–52.http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780814752999/
193
Peg Rawes, Tim Mathews, Stephen Loo. Introduction. In: Rawes P, Loo S, Mathews T, eds. Poetic biopolitics: practices of relation in architecture and the arts. London: : I.B. Tauris 2016. 1–7.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d5dfab7f-fe19-ec11-b563-0050f2f06092
194
Rose, Nikolas S. Politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2007. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rqmf
195
Rose N. Governing the soul: the shaping of the private self. 2nd ed. London: : Free Association 1999.
196
Runting H, Frichot H. Welcome to The Promenade City: A Gentri-Fictional Cartography of Stockholm in the Postindustrial Age. Architecture and Culture 2015;3:397–411. doi:10.1080/20507828.2015.1082056
197
Bourriaud N. A precarious existence: vulnerability in the public domain. Rotterdam: : NAi Publishers 2009.
198
Wilson EA. Depression, Biology, Aggression: Introduction to Gut Feminism. Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 2015;1:1–10. doi:10.28968/cftt.v1i1.28812
199
Peggy Dreamer. Parametric Schizophrenia. In: Poole M, Shvartzerg M, eds. The politics of parametricism: digital technologies in architecture. London, England: : Bloomsbury Academic 2015. 178–88.http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=2080895
200
Sigmund Freud. Constructions in analysis. In: The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 23: (1937-1939). London: : The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis 1964. 255–69.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=34633418-3816-e811-80cd-005056af4099
201
Fuss D, Sanders J. Bergasse 19: Inside Freud’s Office. In: Sanders J, ed. Stud: architectures of masculinity. London: : Routledge 2019. 112–32.https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781003014720
202
Guattari F. La Borde: a clinic unlike any other. In: Chaosophy: Texts and interview 1972-1977. Semiotext(e) 2007. 176–94.
203
Blum, Virginia. Psychotopologies: closing the circuit between psychic and material space. Environment and Planning - Part D 1AD;29:1030–47.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1068/d11910
204
Burgin V. Geometry and abjection. In: In/different spaces : place and memory in visual culture. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1996. 38–56.
205
Burgin V. Perverse Space. In: Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992. 219–40.
206
Burgoyne B. Autism and Topology. In: Drawing the soul: schemas and models in psychoanalysis. London: : Karnac 2003. 198–217.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=06b517a9-3d48-ef11-991a-ebf013606e83
207
Castoriadis C. The psyche and the society anew. In: Figures of the Thinkable.353–77.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bbd727a0-6d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
208
Grosz EA. Space, time, and bodies. In: Space, time, and perversion : essays on the politics of bodies. London: : Routledge 1995. 83–7.
209
Freud S. The Ego and the Id. http://www.pep-web.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/document.php?id=se.019.0001a#p0048
210
Freud S. A Note on the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis. In: The essentials of psycho-analysis. London: : Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis 1986. 81–215.
211
Freud S. Instincts and their Vicissitudes. In: The essentials of psycho-analysis. London: : Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis 1986. 197–217.
212
Holm LE. Psychosis and the ineffable space of modernism. The Journal of Architecture 2013;18:402–24. doi:10.1080/13602365.2013.808684
213
Holm L. What Lacan said re: architecture. Critical Quarterly 2000;42:29–64. doi:10.1111/1467-8705.00286
214
Lacan J, Miller J-A, Sheridan A, et al. The four fundamental concepts of psycho-analysis. London: : Vintage 1998.
215
Lacan J. The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis. In: Ecrits: the first complete edition in English. New York: : W.W. Norton & Co 2006. 197–268.
216
Mulvey L. Pandora: topographies of the mask and curiosity. In: Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992. 53–71.
217
Laura Mulvey. Cinematic Space: Desiring and Deciphering. In: Desiring practices: architecture, gender and the interdisciplinary. London: : Black Dog Publishing 1996. 206–16.
218
Rendell J. The architecture of psychoanalysis: spaces of transition. London: : I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd 2017. https://www-bloomsburyarchitecturelibrary-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/encyclopedia?docid=b-9781350988453
219
Jane Rendell. X Marks the Spot that Will Have Been. In: Architecture and the unconscious. Farnham: : Ashgate 2016.
