1
David N, Kramer C. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316036488
2
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
3
Flannery KV. Research strategy and formative Mesoamerica; a prayer for an endangered species. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
4
Banning EB. The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. New York: : London 2000.
5
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research 1981;37:195–208.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
6
Hodder I. Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity 1991;56:7–18. doi:10.2307/280968
7
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American antiquity 1972;37:156–65.
8
Binford LB. A consideration of archaeological research design. American antiquity 1964;29:425–41.
9
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 1973;47:6–18. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
10
Flannery KV. The golden marshalltown. American Anthropologist, New Series 1982;84:265–78.
11
Hodder I. Excavating Çatalhöyük: south, north and KOPAL area reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : MacDonald Institute for archaeological reseach 2007.
12
Trigger BG. Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity 1970;44:26–37. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00040953
13
Woolley L. The beginnings of Ur. In: Ur ‘of the Chaldees’: a revised and updated edition of Sir Leonard Woolley’s Excavations at Ur. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1982. 24–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d856208b-ec7a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
14
Goldberg P. Formation processes of the archaeological record. Geoarchaeology 1989;4:277–8. doi:10.1002/gea.3340040307
15
Schiffer MB. Formation processes. In: Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: : University of New Mexico Press 1987. 143-150-199–217.
16
Wood W, Johnson D. A survey of disturbance processes in archaeological site formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1978;1.
17
Hodder I. Excavating Çatalhöyük: south, north and KOPAL area reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : MacDonald Institute for archaeological reseach 2007.
18
Araujo AGM, Feathers JK, Arroyo-Kalin M, et al. Lapa das boleiras rockshelter: stratigraphy and formation processes at a paleoamerican site in Central Brazil. Journal of Archaeological Science 2008;35:3186–202. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2008.07.007
19
Malinsky-Buller A, Hovers E, Marder O. Making time: ‘Living floors’, ‘palimpsests’ and site formation processes – A perspective from the open-air Lower Paleolithic site of Revadim Quarry, Israel. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2011;30:89–101. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2010.11.002
20
Schick K. Geoarchaeological analysis of an acheulean site at Kalambo Falls, Zambia. GEOARCHAEOLOGY 1992;7:1–26. doi:10.1002/gea.3340070102
21
Shahack-Gross R, Albert R-M, Gilboa A, et al. Geoarchaeology in an urban context: The uses of space in a Phoenician monumental building at Tel Dor (Israel). Journal of Archaeological Science 2005;32:1417–31. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2005.04.001
22
Andrefsky W. Raw material availability and organization of technology. American Antiquity 1994;59:21–34.
23
Binford LR. Forty-seven trips: A case study in the character of archaeological formation process. In: Working at archaeology. London: : Academic Press 1983. 243–68.
24
Binford LR. Organization and formation processes: looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 1979;35:255–73.
25
Binford LR. Dimensional Analysis of Behavior and Site Structure: Learning from an Eskimo Hunting Stand. American Antiquity 1978;43:330–61. doi:10.2307/279390
26
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
27
Hardy-Smith T, Edwards PC. The garbage crisis in prehistory: artefact discard patterns at the Early Natufian site of Wadi Hammeh 27 and the origins of household refuse disposal strategies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2004;23:253–89. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2004.05.001
28
Flannery KV, Winter M. Analyzing household activities. In: The early Mesoamerican village. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009. 34–47.
29
V.M. LaMotta, M.B. Schiffer. Formation processes of house floor assemblages. In: The archaeology of household activities. London: : Routledge 1999. 19–29.https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203014929
30
de Loecker et al. D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003. 113–36.
31
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
32
Hill JD. Introduction. In: Ritual and rubbish in the Iron Age of Wessex: a study on the formation of a specific archaeological record. Oxford: : Tempus Reparatum 1995. 1–11.
33
Hodder I. Excavating Çatalhöyük: south, north and KOPAL area reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : MacDonald Institute for archaeological reseach 2007.
34
Kent S. The archaeological visibility of storage: delineating storage from trash areas. American Antiquity 1999;64:79–94.
35
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:126–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2071af0-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
36
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
37
Nicholas David. The Fulani compound and the archaeologist. World Archaeology 1971;3:111–31.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124068
38
David N, Kramer C. Ethnoarchaeology in Action. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316036488
39
Parker Pearson M, Richards C. Ordering the world: perceptions of architecture, space and time. In: Architecture and order: approaches to social space. London: : Routledge 1994. 1–36.
40
Grahame M. Public and private in the Roman house. In: Domestic space in the Roman world: Pompeii and beyond. Portsmouth, RI: : JRA 1997. 137–64.
41
Kramer C. An archaeological view of a contemporary Kurdish village: domestic architecture, household size and wealth . In: Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. Guildford: : Columbia University Press 1979. 139–63.
42
Thomas J. Pluckhahn. Household Archaeology in the Southeastern United States: History, Trends, and Challenges. Journal of Archaeological Research 2010;18:331–85.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23018401
43
Cynthia Robin. New Directions in Classic Maya Household Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 2003;11:307–56.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053202
44
Katheryn C. Twiss, Amy Bogaard, Doru Bogdan, Tristan Carter, Michael P. Charles, Shahina Farid, Nerissa Russell, Mirjana Stevanović, E. Nurcan Yalman and Lisa Yeomans. Arson or Accident? The Burning of a Neolithic House at Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Journal of Field Archaeology 2008;33:41–57.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40026664
45
Wright KI. The Social Origins of Cooking and Dining in Early Villages of Western Asia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 2000;66:89–121. doi:10.1017/S0079497X0000178X
46
Wright KI (Karen). Domestication and inequality? Households, corporate groups and food processing tools at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2014;33:1–33. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2013.09.007
47
Fairclough G. Meaningful constructions – spatial and functional analysis of medieval buildings. Antiquity 1992;66:348–66. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00081461
48
Foster SM. Analysis of spatial patterns in buildings (access analysis) as an insight into social structure: examples from the Scottish Atlantic Iron Age. Antiquity 1989;63:40–50. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00075566
49
Hill J. Broken K pueblo. In: New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: : Aldine 1968. 103–42.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=df51ecdd-029a-e711-80cb-005056af4099
50
Manfred Bietak, E. B. Pusch, Mark Lehner, M. Verner, D. G. Jeffreys, H. S. Smith, E. Strouhal, D. Arnold, J. Dorner, H. Jaritz, A. J. Spencer, Günter Dreyer, E. Graefe and Michael Allen Hoffman. Ägypten. Archiv für Orientforschung 1985;:128–84.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41662069
51
Lehner M. The Pyramid Age Settlement of the Southern Mount at Giza. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 2002;39. doi:10.2307/40001149
52
Robinson D. The social texture of Pompeii. In: Sequence and space in Pompeii. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 1997. 135–44.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b5667444-039a-e711-80cb-005056af4099
53
Wallace-Hadrill A. Public honour and private shame: the urban texture of Pompeii. In: Urban society in Roman Italy. London: : UCL Press 1995. 39–62.
54
Whitelaw T. House, households and community at Early Minoan Fournou, Korifi: methods and models for interpretation. In: Building communities: house, settlement and society in the Aegean and beyond. London: : British School at Athens 2007. 65–76.
55
Allison PM. Pompeian households: an analysis of the material culture. Los Angeles: : Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at University of California, Los Angeles 2004.
56
Bradley E. Ensor. Kinship theory in archaeology:from crtiques to the study of transformations. American Antiquity 2011;76:203–27.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41331888
57
Laurence R. Roman Pompeii: space and society. 2nd ed. London: : Routledge 2007.
58
Parker BJ, Foster CP. New perspectives on household archaeology. Winona Lake, Ind: : Eisenbrauns 2012. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931379375504761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,New%20perspectives%20on%20household%20archaeology&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9066180631753836537&offset=0
59
Poehler E, Flohr M, Cole K. Pompeii: art, industry and infrastructure. Oxford: : Oxbow 2011.
60
Sharon R. Steadman. Recent Research in the Archaeology of Architecture: Beyond the Foundations. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:51–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053111
61
Wallace-Hadrill A. Houses and society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1994.
62
Warren P. Myrtos: an early Bronze Age settlement in Crete. London: : British School of Archaeology at Athens/Thames and Hudson 1972.
63
Wilk RR, Rathje WL. Household Archaeology. American Behavioral Scientist 1982;25:617–39. doi:10.1177/000276482025006003
64
Whitelaw T. The settlement at Fournou, Korifi, Myrtos and aspects of Early Minoan social organization. In: Minoan society: proceedings of the Cambridge Colloquium 1981. Bristol: : Bristol Classical Press 1983. 323–45.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e07e7e3e-009a-e711-80cb-005056af4099
65
Whitelaw T, Day P, Kiriatzi E, et al. Ceramic traditions at EM IIB Myrtos, Fournou Korifi. In: Techne: craftsmen, craftswomen and craftsmanship in the Aegean Bronze Age : proceedings of the 6th International Aegean Conference/6e Rencontre égéenne internationale Philadelphia, Temple University, 18-21 April 1996. Liège: : Université de Liège 1997. 265–74.
66
Whitelaw T. Feasts of clay? Ceramics and feasting at Early Minoan Myrtos: Fournou Korifi. In: Galanakis I, Wilkinson TC, Bennet J, eds. ΑΘΥΡΜΑΤΑ: critical essays on the archaeology of the eastern Mediterranean in honour of E. Susan Sherratt. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2014. 247–59.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0be196aa-fe99-e711-80cb-005056af4099
67
Andrefsky, Jr W. Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810244
68
Banning EB. The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. New York: : London 2000.
69
Magne MP. Lithic reduction stages and assemblage formation processes. In: Experiments in lithic technology. Oxford, England: : B.A.R 1989. 15–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=35cc60f2-8366-e911-80cd-005056af4099
70
George H. Odell. Stone Tool Research at the End of the Millennium: Procurement and Technology. Journal of Archaeological Research 2000;8:269–331.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053170
71
George H. Odell. Stone Tool Research at the End of the Millennium: Classification, Function, and Behavior. Journal of Archaeological Research 2001;9:45–100.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053173
72
Odell GH. Lithic analysis. New York: : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 2004.
73
Rapp GR. Archaeomineralogy. Berlin: : Springer 2002.
74
Katherine Wright. A classification system for ground stone tools from the prehistoric Levant. Paléorient 1992;18:53–81.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41492491
75
Carter T, Grant S, Kartal M, et al. Networks and Neolithisation: sourcing obsidian from Körtik Tepe (SE Anatolia). Journal of Archaeological Science 2013;40:556–69. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.003
76
Carter T, Milic M. The chipped stone. In: Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2000-2008 seasons. London: : British Institute at Ankara and the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA 2013. 409–70.
77
Carter T, Conolly J, Spasojeviae J. The chipped stone. In: Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005. 221–84.
78
Carter T. Beyond the Mohs scale: Raw material choice and the production of stone vases in a late Minoan context. In: New approaches to old stones: recent studies of ground stone artifacts. London: : Equinox Pub 2008. 66–81.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4d6092b8-e3cd-eb11-a7ad-281878522727
79
Wright KI. The ground stone technologies of Çatalhöyük, 1993-2008. In: Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2000-2008 seasons. London: : British Institute at Ankara and the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA 2013. 365–416.
80
Wright KI (Karen). Domestication and inequality? Households, corporate groups and food processing tools at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2014;33:1–33. doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2013.09.007
81
Bains R, Bar-Yosef D, Russell N, et al. A technological approach to personal ornamentation and social expression at Çatalhöyük. In: Substantive technologies at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2000-2008 seasons. London: : British Institute at Ankara and the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA 2013. 331–63.
82
Wright KI, Critchley P, Garrard A, et al. Stone Bead Technologies and Early Craft Specialization: Insights from Two Neolithic Sites in Eastern Jordan. Levant 2008;40:131–65. doi:10.1179/175638008X348016
83
Wright K, Garrard A. Social identities and the expansion of stone bead-making in Neolithic Western Asia: new evidence from Jordan. Antiquity 2003;77:267–84. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00092267
84
Adams WY, Adams EW. Archaeological typology and practical reality. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558207
85
Adams JL, Archaeology Southwest (Organization). Ground stone analysis: a technological approach. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2014. https://muse-jhu-edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/41396
86
Andrefsky, Jr W. Lithics: Macroscopic Approaches to Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810244
87
Andrefsky W. Lithic debitage: context, form, meaning. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2001.
88
Debénath A, Dibble HL. Handbook of paleolithic typology. Philadelphia: : University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1993.
89
Edmonds MR. Stone tools and society: working stone in Neolithic and Bronze Age Britain. London: : Batsford 1995.
90
Marie-Louise Inizan; Jehanne Féblot-Augustins; Cercle de Recherches et d’Etude Préhistoriques. Technology and terminology of knapped stone : followed by a multilingual vocabulary Arabic, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish / Marie-Louise Inizan ... [et al.] ; translated [from the French] by Jehanne Féblot-Augustins. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_LMS_DS000619591&indx=1&recIds=UCL_LMS_DS000619591&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL_LMS_DS%29&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=inizan%20technology%20knapped&dstmp=1507294273024
91
Rosen SA. Lithics after the Stone Age: a handbook of stone tools from the Levant. Walnut Creek, CA: : AltaMira Press 1997.
92
Rowan YM, Ebeling JR. New approaches to old stones: recent studies of ground stone artifacts. London: : Equinox Pub 2008.
93
Schumann W. Handbook of rocks, minerals, and gemstones. Boston: : Houghton Mifflin 1993.
94
Binford L. Interassemblage variability - the Mousterian and the functional argument. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973. 227–54.
95
Michael S. Bisson. Nineteenth Century Tools for Twenty-First Century Archaeology? Why the Middle Paleolithic Typology of François Bordes Must Be Replaced. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2000;7:1–48.https://www.jstor.org/stable/20177411
96
Francois Bordes and Denise de Sonneville-Bordes. The Significance of Variability in Palaeolithic Assemblages. World Archaeology 1970;2:61–73.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124167
97
Bordes F. On the chronology and contemporaneity of different palaeolithic cultures. In: The explanation of culture change: models in prehistory. London: : Duckworth 1973. 217–26.
98
Barnett WK, Kingery WD, Close AE, et al. News and Short Contributions. Journal of Field Archaeology 1991;18. doi:10.2307/530272
99
Dibble HL. Raw material availability , intensity of utilization and Middle Paleolithic assemblage variability. In: The Middle Paleolithic site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France). Philadelphia: : University Museum, University of Pennsylvania 1995.
100
Fladmark KR. Microdebitage analysis: Initial considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 1982;9:205–20. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(82)90050-4
101
Angela E. Close. The Identification of Style in Lithic Artefacts. World Archaeology 1978;10:223–37.https://www.jstor.org/stable/124230
102
Gero J. Assessing social information in material objects: how well do lithics measure up? In: Time, energy and stone tools. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
103
Sackett JR. Style and Ethnicity in the Kalahari: A Reply to Wiessner. American Antiquity 1985;50:154–9. doi:10.2307/280642
104
Wiessner P. Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 1983;48:253–76. doi:10.2307/280450
105
DeLoecker D. A re-fitter’s paradise. In: Lithic analysis at the Millennium. London: : Institute of Archaeology, University College London 2003. 113–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=43d32496-7536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
106
Pigeot N. Technical and social actors: flintknapping specialists at Magdalenian Etiolles. Archaeological review from Cambridge 1990;9:126–41.
107
Clark JE. Ground stone tools and hunter-gatherer subsistence in southwest Asia: implications for the transition to farming. In: The organization of core technology. Boulder: : Westview Press 1987. 259–84.
108
Perles C. Systems of Exchange and Organization of Production in Neolithic Greece. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 1992;5:115–64. doi:10.1558/jmea.v5i2.115
109
Ramos Millán A, Ángeles Bustillo M, International Flint Symposium. Siliceous rocks and culture. Granada: : Universidad de Granada 1997.
110
Wright KI. Ground-Stone Tools and Hunter-Gatherer Subsistence in Southwest Asia: Implications for the Transition to Farming. American Antiquity 1994;59:238–63. doi:10.2307/281929
111
Adams RM. Complexity in Archaic States. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2001;20:345–60. doi:10.1006/jaar.2000.0377
112
Cherry J. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In: Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1987. 146–72.
113
Binford LR. Willow smoke and dog’s tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity 1980;45:4–20.
114
Davies T, Fry H, Wilson A, et al. Application of an entropy maximizing and dynamics model for understanding settlement structure: the Khabur Triangle in the Middle Bronze and Iron Ages. Journal of Archaeological Science 2014;43:141–54. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2013.12.014
115
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
116
Knappett C, Evans T, Rivers R. Modelling maritime interaction in the Aegean Bronze Age. Antiquity 2008;82:1009–24. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0009774X
117
Roth A, editor. Social change in the Fourth Dynasty (Egypt): the spatial organization of pyramids, tombs and cemeteries. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 1993;30.
118
Bietak M. The archaeology of the ‘gold of valour’. Egyptian archaeology: bulletin of the Egypt Exploration Society 2012;40:42–3.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f53f8d79-7f66-e911-80cd-005056af4099
119
The location of Alashiya: new evidence from petrographic investigation of Alashiyan tablets from el-Amarna and Ugarit. American Journal of Archaeology 2003;107:233–55.
120
Izre’el S. The Amarna letters from Canaan. In: Civilizations of the ancient Near East. Peabody, Mass: : Hendrickson 2000. 2411–20.
121
Postgate N, Wang T, Wilkinson T. The evidence for early writing: utilitarian or ceremonial? Antiquity 1995;69:459–80. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00081874
122
Serpico M, White R. The botanical identity and transport of incense during the Egyptian New Kingdom. Antiquity 2000;74:884–97. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00060531
123
Weiss H. Rediscovering: Tell Leilan on the Habur Plains of Syria. The Biblical Archaeologist 1985;48. doi:10.2307/3209945
124
Weiss H, Akkermans P, Stein GJ, et al. 1985 Excavations at Tell Leilan, Syria. American Journal of Archaeology 1990;94. doi:10.2307/505120
125
Woolley L. The beginnings of Ur. In: Ur ‘of the Chaldees’: a revised and updated edition of Sir Leonard Woolley’s Excavations at Ur. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1982. 24–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d856208b-ec7a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
126
Andrén, Anders, Crozier, Alan. Between artifacts and texts: historical archaeology in global perspective. London: : Plenum Press 1998.
127
Cohen R, Westbrook R. Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations. Baltimore, Md: : Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press 2000.
128
Parker HDD, Rollston CA. The Epigraphic Digital Lab: Teaching Epigraphy in the Twenty-First Century. Near Eastern Archaeology 2016;79:44–56. doi:10.5615/neareastarch.79.1.0044
129
Goren, Yuval, Artzy, Michal, Finkelstein, Israel, et al. Inscribed in clay: provenance study of the Amarna tablets and other ancient Near Eastern texts. Tel Aviv: : Emery and Claire Yass Publications in Archaeology 2004.
130
Little BarbaraJ. Text-aided archaeology. In: Text-aided archaeology. Boca Raton, Fla: : CRC Press 1992. 1–6.
131
Moran, William L. The Amarna letters. English-language ed. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press 1992.
132
Rollston CA, Vaughn AG. Fakes, Forgeries and Biblical Scholarship. Near Eastern archaeology 2005;68:61–72.
133
Westbrook, Raymond, Cohen, Raymond. Amarna diplomacy: the beginnings of international relations. Baltimore, Md: : Johns Hopkins Univeristy Press 2000. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb30995.0001.001
134
Duday H. The archaeology of the dead: lectures in archaeothanatology. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2009.
135
Giles M. Preserving the body. In: The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of death and burial. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013. 475–96.
136
Michael Parker Perason. Form now to then: ethnoarchaeology and analogy. In: The archaeology of death and burial. Stroud: : Sutton 1999. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364ba8be-9666-e911-80cd-005056af4099
137
C. Scarre. The meaning of death: funerary beliefs and the prehistorian. In: Renfrew C, Zubrow EBW, eds. The Ancient Mind. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994. 75–82. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511598388
138
Ucko PJ. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains. World Archaeology 1969;1:262–80. doi:10.1080/00438243.1969.9979444
139
Evans JG. Stonehenge - the enviroment in the Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age and a Beaker Age burial. Wiltshire archaeological and natural history magazine 1984;78:7–30.
140
Bentley RA, Wahl J, Price TD, et al. Isotopic signatures and hereditary traits: snapshot of a Neolithic community in Germany. Antiquity 2008;82:290–304. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00096812
141
Bickle P, Hofmann D. Moving on: the contribution of isotope studies to the early Neolithic of Central Europe. Antiquity 2007;81:1029–41. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00096095
142
Golitko M, Keeley LH. Beating ploughshares back into swords: warfare in the Linearbandkeramik. Antiquity 2007;81:332–42. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00095211
143
Jantzen D, Brinker U, Orschiedt J, et al. A Bronze Age battlefield? Weapons and trauma in the Tollense Valley, north-eastern Germany. Antiquity 2011;85:417–33. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00067843
144
Michael Parker Pearson. Mortuary practices, society and ideology: an ethnographical study. In: Hodder I, ed. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1982. 99–113. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558252
145
Rega E. Age, gender and biological reality in the Early Bronze Age cemetery at Mokrin. In: Invisible people and processes: writing gender and childhood into European archaeology. London: : Leicester University Press 1996. 229–47.
146
Shennan S. The social organization at Branč. Antiquity 1975;49:279–88. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00070319
147
Caple C. Objects: reluctant witnesses to the past. London: : Routledge 2006.
148
Costin C. Craft production. In: Handbook of archaeological methods. Lanham, Md: : Altamira Press 2005. 1034–107.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=364d506d-ef01-e811-80cd-005056af4099
149
Forbes RJ. Studies in ancient technology: Vol.8. Leiden: : Brill 1971.
150
Hodges, Henry. Artifacts: an introduction to early materials and technology. Duckworth 1989.
151
Hurcombe, L. M. Archaeological artefacts as material culture. London: : Routledge 2007.
152
Shaw, Ian, Nicholson, Paul T. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
153
Singer C. A history of technology: Vol.1: From earliest times to fall of ancient empires. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1954. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb02191.0001.001
154
Banning EB. The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. New York: : London 2000.
155
Rice PM. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Second edition. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2015.
156
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 1. Function, Style, and Origins. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:133–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053114
157
Braun D. Pots as tools. In: Archaeological hammers and theories. New York: : Academic Press 1983. 107–34.
158
Rice PM. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Second edition. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2015.
159
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 1. Function, Style, and Origins. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:133–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053114
160
Nicholas David, Judy Sterner and Kodzo Gavua. Why Pots are Decorated. Current Anthropology 1988;29:365–89.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2743453
161
Gosselain OP. Technology and Style: Potters and Pottery Among Bafia of Cameroon. Man 1992;27. doi:10.2307/2803929
162
Hegmon M. Archaeological Research on Style. Annual Review of Anthropology 1992;21:517–36. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002505
163
Frank Hole. Analysis of Structure and Design in Prehistoric Ceramics. World Archaeology 1984;15:326–47.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124629
164
Lechtman H. Style in technology: some early thoughts. In: Material culture: styles, organization, and dynamics of technology. St. Paul: : West Pub. Co 1977. 3–20.
165
Rice PM. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Second edition. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2015.
166
Barbara J. Mills. Integrating Functional Analyses of Vessels and Sherds through Models of Ceramic Assemblage Formation. World Archaeology 1989;21:133–47.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124489
167
Morris E. Staying alive: the function and use of prehistoric ceramics. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: : Oxbow 2002. 54–61.
168
Prudence M. Rice. On the Origins of Pottery. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1999;6:1–54.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177395
169
Woodward A, Blinkthorn J. Size is important: Iron Age vessels capacities in central and southern England. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 21–35.
170
Ferguson L. Struggling with pots in colonial South Carolina. In: The archaeology of inequality. Oxford: : Blackwell 1991. 28–39.
171
Gosselain OP. Social and technical identity in a clay crystal ball. In: The archaeology of social boundaries. Washington [D.C.]: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1998. 78–106.
172
Gosselain OP. Technology and Style: Potters and Pottery Among Bafia of Cameroon. Man 1992;27. doi:10.2307/2803929
173
Hamilton S. Between ritual and routine: interpreting prehistoric British pottery production and distribution. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: : Oxbow 2002. 38–53.
174
Meadows K. Much ado about nothing: the social context of eating and drinking in early Roman Britain. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 21–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9b5a7c27-75c8-eb11-a7ad-281878521be7
175
Amiran R, Beck P, Zevulan U. Ancient pottery of the Holy Land: from its beginnings in the Neolithic period to the end of the Iron Age. Jerusalem: : Masada Press 1969.
176
Dothan T, Ḥevrah la-ḥaḳirat Erets-Yiśraʼel ṿe-ʻatiḳoteha. The Philistines and their material culture. Jerusalem: : Israel Exploration Society 1982.
177
Last J, et al. Pottery from the east mound. In: Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons. Cambridge: : McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 2005.
178
Wright K, Najjar M, Last J, et al. The Wadi Faynan Fourth and Third Millennia Project, 1997: Report on the First Season of Test Excavations at Wadi Faynan 100. Levant 1998;30:33–60. doi:10.1179/007589198790217142
179
Orton C, Hughes M. Pottery in archaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.
180
Sinopoli CM. Approaches to archaeological ceramics. New York: : Plenum Press 1991.
181
Skibo JM. Pottery function: a use-alteration perspective. New York: : Plenum Press 1992.
182
Banning EB. The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. New York: : London 2000.
183
Binford LR. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’ . Journal of Anthropological Research 1981;37:195–208.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
184
Flannery, Kent V. The early Mesoamerican village. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
185
Hodder I. Interpretive Archaeology and Its Role. American Antiquity 1991;56:7–18. doi:10.2307/280968
186
Schiffer MB. Archaeological context and systemic context. American antiquity 1972;37:156–65.
187
Binford LB. A consideration of archaeological research design. American antiquity 1964;29:425–41.
188
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity 1973;47:6–18. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
189
Flannery KV. The golden marshalltown. American Anthropologist, New Series 1982;84:265–78.
190
Trigger BG. Aims in Prehistoric Archaeology. Antiquity 1970;44:26–37. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00040953
191
Woolley L. The beginnings of Ur. In: Ur ‘of the Chaldees’: a revised and updated edition of Sir Leonard Woolley’s Excavations at Ur. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1982. 24–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d856208b-ec7a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
