1
Hannigan B. Company law. Sixth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2021. doi:10.1093/he/9780198848493.001.0001
2
Sealy LS, Worthington S, Sealy LS. Sealy and Worthington’s cases and materials in company law. 10th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
3
Reisberg A, Donovan AHLP, Pettet BG. Pettet, Lowry & Reisberg’s company law. Fifth edition. Harlow, United Kingdom: : Pearson Education Limited 2018. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUCL?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxMjkyMDc4NjQ5L3BkZjJodG1sZXgvaW5kZXguaHRtbCJ9
4
French D. Blackstone’s statutes on company law 2014-2015. 18th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
5
Dignam AJ, Goo SH, Hicks A. Hicks & Goo’s cases and materials on company law. 7th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
6
Kershaw D. Company law in context: text and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
7
Dignam AJ, Lowry JP. Company law. Twelfth edition. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2022. doi:10.1093/he/9780192865359.001.0001
8
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. 9th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2012.
9
Kraakman RH. What is Corporate Law? In: The anatomy of corporate law : a comparative and functional approach. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739630.001.0001
10
Easterbrook FH, Fischel DR. The Corporate Contract. In: The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1991. 35–9.
11
Coase RH. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 1937;4:386–405. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
12
Bainbridge SM. In Defense of the Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2002. doi:10.2139/ssrn.303780
13
Green RM. Shareholders as Stakeholders: Changing Metaphors of Corporate Governance. Washington and Lee Law Review;50.http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol50/iss4/
14
Merrick Dodd, Jr E. For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees? Harvard Law Review 1932;45:1145–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1331697
15
Berle Jr AA. For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note. Harvard Law Review 1932;45:1365–72.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1331920
16
Kraakman RH. Agency Problems and Legal Strategies. In: The anatomy of corporate law : a comparative and functional approach. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
17
Berle AA, Means GC. The New Concept of the Corporation. In: The modern corporation and private property. New York: : Harcourt, Brace & World 1968. 309–13.
18
Hannigan B. Formation, classification and registration of companies. In: Company Law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
19
Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics;3:305–60. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
20
Finch V, Freedman J. The limited liability partnership: pick and mix or mix-up? Journal of Business Law 2002;:475–512.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUK/Journals/Publications/Journal-of-Business-Law?skipAnonymous=true&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
21
Hannigan B. Corporate personality. In: Company Law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. 40–62.
22
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Corporate entity, limited liability and incorporation. In: Pettet’s company law : company law and corporate finance. Harlow: : Pearson 2012. 32–48.
23
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Advantages and disadvantages of incorporation. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2012.
24
Blair MM. The Four Functions of Corporate Personhood. SSRN Working Paper Serieshttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2037356
25
Ireland P. The Rise of the Limited Liability Company. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 1984;12:239–60.http://kar.kent.ac.uk/1940/
26
Radin M. Endless Problem of Corporate Personality, The. Columbia Law Review 1932;32:643–67.http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/clr32&div=44&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
27
Cataldo BF. Limited Liability with One-Man Companies and Subsidiary Corporations. Law and contemporary problems 1953;18:473–504.http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp18&div=34&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
28
Easterbrook FH, Fischel DR. Limited Liability and the Corporation. University of Chicago Law Review 1985;52:89–117.http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uclr52&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
29
Davies PL, Worthington S, B Gower LC. Limited liability and lifting the veil. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2012.
30
Halpern P, Trebilcock M, Turnbull S. Economic Analysis of Limited Liability in Corporation Law, An. University of Toronto Law Journal 1980;30.http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/utlj30&div=14&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
31
Grier N. Piercing the Corporate Veil: Edinburgh Law Review 2014;18:275–9. doi:10.3366/elr.2014.0212
32
Moore M. ‘A temple built on faulty foundations’: piercing the corporate veil and the legacy of Salomon v Salomon. Journal of Business Law;:180–203.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC37B36A0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
33
Payne J. Lifting the Corporate Veil: A Reassessment of the Fraud Exception. The Cambridge Law Journal;56:284–90.http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj56&div=25&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
34
Rixon FG. Lifting the veil between holding and subsidiary companies. Law Quarterly Review;102:415–23.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICF9F6DC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
35
Hannigan B. Chapter 4 - the company constitution. In: Company Law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012.
36
Hannigan B. Chapter 14 - membership and incidents of membership. In: Company Law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. 307–16.
37
Hannigan B. Chapter 8 - duty to act within constitution and powers. In: Company Law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2012. 163–82.
38
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Chapter 4 - entrenchment of rights. In: Pettet’s Company Law. Harlow: : Pearson 2012. https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292078649/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Cover
39
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Chapter 5 - organisation of functions and corporate powers. In: Pettet’s Company Law. Harlow: : Pearson 2012. https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUCL?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxMjkyMDc4NjQ5L3BkZjJodG1sZXgvaW5kZXguaHRtbCJ9
40
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Chapter 6 - relations with third parties: agency and constitutional limitations. In: Pettet’s Company Law. Harlow: : Pearson 2012.
41
Ferran E. The Decision of the House of Lords in Russell v. Northern Bank Development Corporation Limited. The Cambridge Law Journal 1994;53. doi:10.1017/S0008197300099086
42
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Chapter 3 - sources of company law and the company’s constitution. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2012. 64–79.
43
Rixon, F. G. Competing Interests and Conflicting Principles: An Examination of the Power of Alteration of Articles of Association. Modern Law Review 1986;49.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/modlr49&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&collection=journals&page=446
44
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Chapter 7 - corporate actions. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2012. 163–90.