1.
Hannigan B. Company law. Sixth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021.
2.
Sealy LS, Worthington S, Sealy LS. Sealy and Worthington’s cases and materials in company law. 10th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
3.
Reisberg A, Donovan AHLP, Pettet BG. Pettet, Lowry & Reisberg’s company law [Internet]. Fifth edition. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited; 2018. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUCL?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxMjkyMDc4NjQ5L3BkZjJodG1sZXgvaW5kZXguaHRtbCJ9
4.
French D. Blackstone’s statutes on company law 2014-2015. 18th ed. Vol. Blackstone’s statutes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
5.
Dignam AJ, Goo SH, Hicks A. Hicks & Goo’s cases and materials on company law. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
6.
Kershaw D. Company law in context: text and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
7.
Dignam AJ, Lowry JP. Company law. Twelfth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2022.
8.
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2012.
9.
Kraakman RH. What is Corporate Law? In: The anatomy of corporate law : a comparative and functional approach. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
10.
Easterbrook FH, Fischel DR. The Corporate Contract. In: The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1991. p. 35–9.
11.
Coase RH. The Nature of the Firm. Economica. 1937 Nov;4(16):386–405.
12.
Bainbridge SM. In Defense of the Shareholder Wealth Maximization Norm. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2002;
13.
Green RM. Shareholders as Stakeholders: Changing Metaphors of Corporate Governance. Washington and Lee Law Review [Internet]. 50(4). Available from: http://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol50/iss4/
14.
Merrick Dodd, Jr E. For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees? Harvard Law Review [Internet]. 1932;45(7):1145–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1331697
15.
Berle Jr AA. For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note. Harvard Law Review [Internet]. 1932;45(8):1365–72. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1331920
16.
Kraakman RH. Agency Problems and Legal Strategies. In: The anatomy of corporate law : a comparative and functional approach. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
17.
Berle AA, Means GC. The New Concept of the Corporation. In: The modern corporation and private property. Rev. ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World; 1968. p. 309–13.
18.
Hannigan B. Formation, classification and registration of companies. In: Company Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
19.
Jensen MC, Meckling WH. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics [Internet]. 3(4):305–60. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X7690026X
20.
Finch V, Freedman J. The limited liability partnership: pick and mix or mix-up? Journal of Business Law [Internet]. 2002;475–512. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUK/Journals/Publications/Journal-of-Business-Law?skipAnonymous=true&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
21.
Hannigan B. Corporate personality. In: Company Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 40–62.
22.
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Corporate entity, limited liability and incorporation. In: Pettet’s company law : company law and corporate finance. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2012. p. 32–48.
23.
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Advantages and disadvantages of incorporation. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2012.
24.
Blair MM. The Four Functions of Corporate Personhood. SSRN Working Paper Series [Internet]. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2037356
25.
Ireland P. The Rise of the Limited Liability Company. International Journal of the Sociology of Law [Internet]. 1984;12:239–60. Available from: http://kar.kent.ac.uk/1940/
26.
Radin M. Endless Problem of Corporate Personality, The. Columbia Law Review [Internet]. 1932;32:643–67. Available from: http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/clr32&div=44&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
27.
Cataldo BF. Limited Liability with One-Man Companies and Subsidiary Corporations. Law and contemporary problems [Internet]. 1953;18:473–504. Available from: http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp18&div=34&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
28.
Easterbrook FH, Fischel DR. Limited Liability and the Corporation. University of Chicago Law Review [Internet]. 1985;52:89–117. Available from: http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uclr52&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
29.
Davies PL, Worthington S, B Gower LC. Limited liability and lifting the veil. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2012.
30.
Halpern P, Trebilcock M, Turnbull S. Economic Analysis of Limited Liability in Corporation Law, An. University of Toronto Law Journal [Internet]. 1980;30. Available from: http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/utlj30&div=14&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
31.
Grier N. Piercing the Corporate Veil: Edinburgh Law Review. 2014 May;18(2):275–9.
32.
Moore M. ‘A temple built on faulty foundations’: piercing the corporate veil and the legacy of Salomon v Salomon. Journal of Business Law [Internet]. :180–203. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC37B36A0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
33.
Payne J. Lifting the Corporate Veil: A Reassessment of the Fraud Exception. The Cambridge Law Journal [Internet]. 56(2):284–90. Available from: http://heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/camblj56&div=25&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
34.
Rixon FG. Lifting the veil between holding and subsidiary companies. Law Quarterly Review [Internet]. 102(3):415–23. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICF9F6DC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
35.
Hannigan B. Chapter 4 - the company constitution. In: Company Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
36.
Hannigan B. Chapter 14 - membership and incidents of membership. In: Company Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 307–16.
37.
Hannigan B. Chapter 8 - duty to act within constitution and powers. In: Company Law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 163–82.
38.
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Chapter 4 - entrenchment of rights. In: Pettet’s Company Law [Internet]. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2012. Available from: https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9781292078649/pdf2htmlex/index.html#page_Cover
39.
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Chapter 5 - organisation of functions and corporate powers. In: Pettet’s Company Law [Internet]. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2012. Available from: https://bibliu.com/users/saml/samlUCL?RelayState=eyJjdXN0b21fbGF1bmNoX3VybCI6IiMvdmlldy9ib29rcy85NzgxMjkyMDc4NjQ5L3BkZjJodG1sZXgvaW5kZXguaHRtbCJ9
40.
Lowry JP, Reisberg A, Pettet BG. Chapter 6 - relations with third parties: agency and constitutional limitations. In: Pettet’s Company Law. 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2012.
41.
Ferran E. The Decision of the House of Lords in Russell v. Northern Bank Development Corporation Limited. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1994 Jul;53(02).
42.
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Chapter 3 - sources of company law and the company’s constitution. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2012. p. 64–79.
43.
Rixon, F. G. Competing Interests and Conflicting Principles: An Examination of the Power of Alteration of Articles of Association. Modern Law Review [Internet]. 1986;49(4). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/modlr49&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&collection=journals&page=446
44.
Davies PL, Worthington S, Gower LCB. Chapter 7 - corporate actions. In: Gower and Davies’ principles of modern company law. 9th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2012. p. 163–90.