1.
Smith RS. Alternative perspectives on childhood. In: A universal child? [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010. p. 11–27. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_63513.pdf
2.
Sloth-Nielsen J. Children’s rights and the law in African context. In: Children’s rights in Africa: a legal perspective [Internet]. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2008. p. 3–11. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_64126.pdf
3.
Van Bueren G. The scope of Article 40. In: Article 40: child criminal justice [Internet]. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2006. p. 11–31. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_66291.pdf
4.
Qvortrup, Jens, Corsaro, William A., Honig, Michael-Sebastian. The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
5.
Hunt Federle K. Rights from Downhill. The International Journal of Children’s Rights. 1994 Jan 1;2(4):343–68.
6.
Morrison, Heidi. The global history of childhood reader. Vol. Routledge readers in history. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012.
7.
Wyness, Michael G. Childhood and society. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
8.
Freeman M. The Human Rights of Children. Current Legal Problems. 2010 Jan 1;63(1):1–44.
9.
Fass P. A Historical Context for the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2011;633(1):17–29.
10.
Korczak, Janusz. Janusz Korczak: the child’s right to respect. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2009.
11.
James A. Agency. In: The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009. p. 34–45.
12.
Ferguson L. Not merely rights for children but children’s rights: The theory gap and the assumption of the importance of children’s rights. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2013 Jan 1;21(2):177–208.
13.
Dekker JJH. The Century of the Child Revisited. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2000;8(2):133–50.
14.
Eichsteller G. Janusz Korczak - His Legacy and its Relevance for Children’s Rights Today. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2009;17(3):377–92.
15.
Waites, Matthew. The Age of Consent: young people, sexuality and citizenship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.
16.
Gran B. Comparing Children’s Rights: Introducing the Children’s Rights Index. The International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2010 Jan 1;18(1):1–17.
17.
Onora O’Neill. Children’s Rights and Children’s Lives. Ethics. 1988;98(3):445–63.
18.
UN Committtee on the Rights of the Child. UNCRC, General Comment Number 12 - The Right of the Child to be Heard (2009).
19.
A (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 185.
20.
The Supreme Court. ZH (Tanzania) (FC) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department. Vol. UKSC 4, The Supreme Court [decided cases]. 2011.
21.
Thomas N. Towards a Theory of Children’s Participation. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2007;15(2):199–218.
22.
Alderson et. al. P. The Participation Rights of Premature Babies. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2005;13(1–2):31–50.
23.
Lundy L, McEvoy L. Children’s rights and research processes: Assisting children to (in)formed views. Childhood. 2012 Feb 1;19(1):129–44.
24.
Children’s Parliament. Children say what they think about the Scottish Government Rights of children and young people bill [Internet]. Children’s Parliament. Available from: http://www.childrensparliament.org.uk/new-assets/childrens-bill/CP-CHILDRENS%20RESPONSE-Rights-of%20Children-and-Young%20People-Bill.pdf
25.
Prout A. Children’s participation: control and self-realisation in British late modernity. Children <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Society. 2000 Sep;14(4):304–15.
26.
Farson R. Self-determination and the double standard. In: Birthrights. New York: Macmillan; p. 26–41.
27.
Hill M, Davis J, Prout A, Tisdall K. Moving the participation agenda forward. Children & Society. 2004 Apr;18(2):77–96.
28.
Barkai Y. The Child Paradox in First Amendment Doctrine. New York University Law Review [Internet]. 2012;87(5):1414–51. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nylr87&div=39&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
29.
UNCRC. UN Convention on the Rights of the Child - Optional Protocol on a Communication Procedure.
30.
James A. To Be (Come) or Not to Be (Come): Understanding Children’s Citizenship. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2011;633(1):167–79.
31.
Wall J. Can democracy represent children? Toward a politics of difference. Childhood. 2012;19(1):86–100.
32.
Cook P. Against a minimum voting age. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. 2013 Jun;16(3):439–58.
33.
Lee Y. Communications Procedure Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: 3rd Optional Protocol. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2010;18(4):567–84.
34.
Smith R. The Third Optional Protocol to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child? – Challenges Arising Transforming the Rhetoric into Reality. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2013 Jan 1;21(2):305–22.
35.
Aoife Nolan. The child as ‘ democratic citizen’ : challenging the ‘participation gap’. Public Law [Internet]. 2010;767–82. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I07A8AAB1C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
36.
de Beco G. The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on a Communications Procedure: Good News? Human Rights Law Review. 2013 Jun 1;13(2):367–87.
37.
Lister R. Why Citizenship: Where, When and How Children? Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2007 Jan 29;8(2):693–718.
38.
Blitz BK. Neither seen nor heard: compound deprivation among stateless children. In: Children without a state: a global human rights challenge. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2011. p. 43–66.
39.
Rehfeld A. The Child as Democratic Citizen. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2010 Dec 22;633(1):141–66.
40.
Holt J. Escape from Childhood: The Needs and Rights of Children. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin; 1974.
41.
Appell A. Pre-Political Child of Child-Centered Jurisprudence. Houston Law Review [Internet]. 2009;46(3):703–58. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hulr46&id=733&collection=journals&index=journals/hulr
42.
Hodgson D. The Child’s Right to Life, Survival and Development. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 1994;2:369–94.
43.
Woodhead M. Early childhood development: A question of rights. International Journal of Early Childhood. 2005 Dec;37(3):79–98.
44.
Nowak M. Extract from Article 6: The right to life, survival, and development. In: Article 6: The right to life, survival, and development. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2005. p. 11–35.
45.
Buss E, Maclean M. Law and child development in the UK and the US. Journal of Children’s Services. 2011;6(4):236–47.
46.
Rao N. Children’s rights to survival, development, and early education in India: The critical role of the Integrated Child Development Services program. International Journal of Early Childhood. 2005 Dec;37(3):15–31.
47.
UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. General comment no. 14 on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration (art. 3, para. 1)* [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/crc/docs/GC/CRC_C_GC_14_ENG.pdf
48.
Freeman, Michael D. A. Article 3: the best interests of the child. Vol. Commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2007.
49.
The Supreme Court. ZH (Tanzania) (FC) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department. Vol. UKSC 4, The Supreme Court [decided cases]. 2011.
50.
Fortin J. Are Children’s Best Interests Really Best? ZH (Tanzania) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. The Modern Law Review. 2011 Nov;74(6):947–61.
51.
Alston P. The best interests principle: Towards a reconciliation of culture and human rights. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 1994;8(1):1–25.
52.
Eekelaar J. The interests of the child and the child’s wishes: The role of dynamic self-determinism. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 1994;8(1):42–61.
53.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Private law disputes involving children. In: Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2013. p. 157–81. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_69126.pdf
54.
Liddy J. The Concept of Family Life under the ECHR. European Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 1998;1:15–25. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IB6E61540E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
55.
In re G (children) (FC).
56.
Smith L. Is Three a Crowd? Lesbian Mothers’ Perspective on Parental Status in Law. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2006;18(2):231–52.
57.
Callus T. A new parenthood paradigm for twenty-first century family law in England and Wales? Legal Studies. 2012 Sep;32(3):347–68.
58.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: The work of family judges in uncertain times [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2013. Available from: http://copac.ac.uk/search?author=Eekelaar%20&title=Family%20Justice&rn=2
59.
Bernstein G, Triger Z. Over-Parenting. U C Davis Law Review. 2011;44(4):1221–80.
60.
James et. al. A. Turn Down the Volume? Not Hearing Children in Family Proceedings. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2004;16(2):189–202.
61.
Fortin J. Children’s Rights to Know Their Origins - Too Far, Too Fast? Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2009;21(3):336–55.
62.
Spar DL. Trading Places: The Practice and Poltics of Adoption. In: The baby business: How money, science, and politics drive the commerce of conception. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press; 2006. p. 159–94.
63.
Graham KT. Same-Sex Couples: Their Rights as Parents and Their Children’s Rights as Children. Santa Clara Law Review. 2008;48(4):999–1038.
64.
Lind J, Johansson S. Preservation of the Child’s Background in In- and Intercountry Adoption. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2009;17(2):235–60.
65.
Becker AB. What’s Marriage (and Family) Got to Do with It? Support for Same-Sex Marriage, Legal Unions, and Gay and Lesbian Couples Raising Children. Social Science Quarterly. 2012 Dec;93(4):1007–29.
66.
Ronen Y. Redifining the child’s right to identity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2004 Aug 1;18(2):147–77.
67.
• CCT 4/00 Christian Education South Africa v. Minister of Education [2000] ZACC 11.
68.
• R (Williamson) v. Secretary of State for Education UKHL 15 [2005] 2. A.C 246.
69.
Freeman, Michael. The Moral Status of Children: Essays on the Rights of the Child. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1997.
70.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. General comment no.13. The right of the child to freedom from all forms of violence.
71.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. General comment no. 7 (2005). Implementing child rights in early childhood.
72.
Durrant J. Legal Reform and Attitudes Toward Physical Punishment in Sweden. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2003;11(2):147–73.
73.
Svevo-Cianci KA, Herczog M, Krappmann L, Cook P. The new UN CRC General Comment 13: "The right of the child to freedom from all forms of violence” - Changing how the world conceptualizes child protection. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2011 Dec;35(12):979–89.
74.
Hart SN, Lee Y, Wernham M. A new age for child protection – General comment 13: Why it is important, how it was constructed, and what it intends? Child Abuse & Neglect. 2011 Dec;35(12):970–8.
75.
Afifi TO, Mota NP, Dasiewicz P, MacMillan HL, Sareen J. Physical Punishment and Mental Disorders: Results From a Nationally Representative US Sample. Pediatrics. 2012 Jul 2;130(2):184–92.
76.
United Nations Human Rights. Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. 2002.
77.
Lee, Nick. Childhood and society: growing up in an age of uncertainty. Vol. Issues in society. Maidenhead: Open University; 2001.
78.
Butler UM. Freedom, Revolt and ‘Citizenship’: Three pillars of identity for youngsters living on the streets of Rio de Janeiro. Childhood. 2009 Feb 1;16(1):11–29.
79.
Staiger I. Trafficking in Children for the Purpose of Sexual Exploitation in the EU. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 2005 Dec 1;13(4):603–24.
80.
Pare M. Why Have Street Children Disappeared? – The Role of International Human Rights Law in Protecting Vulnerable Groups. International Journal of Children’s Rights [Internet]. 2003;11(1):1–32. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intjchrb11&id=11&collection=journals&index=journals/intjchrb
81.
Scullion D. Passive victims or empowered actors: Accommodating the needs of child domestic workers. The International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2013 Jan 1;21(1):97–126.
82.
Rizzini I. Street Children: An Excluded Generation in Latin America. Childhood. 1996 May 1;3(2):215–33.
83.
Davies M. A Childish Culture?: Shared understandings, agency and intervention: an anthropological study of street children in northwest Kenya. Childhood. 2008 Aug 1;15(3):309–30.
84.
Raffaelli M, et. al. How Do Brazilian Street Youth Experience ‘the Street’?: Analysis of a Sentence Completion Task. Childhood. 2001 Aug 1;8(3):396–415.
85.
Nolan, Aoife. Children’s socio-economic rights, democracy and the courts. Vol. Human rights law in perspective. Oxford: Hart; 2011.
86.
Stewart L. Interpreting and Limiting the Basic Socio-Economic Rights of Children in Cases Where They Overlap With the Socio-Economic Rights of Others. South African Journal on Human Rights. 2008;24(3):472–94.
87.
Dixon R, Nussbaum MC. Children’s Rights and the Capability Approach: The Question of Special Priority. Cornell Law Review. 2012;97(3):549–95.
88.
Liebel M. Chapter 11: Do children have a right to work? Working children’s movements in the struggle for social justice. In: Reconceptualizing children’s rights in international development: living rights, social justice, translations [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 225–49. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_69044.pdf
89.
Muntarbhorn V. Child Rights and Social Clauses: Child Labour Elimination as a Social Cause? International Journal of Children’s Rights [Internet]. 1998;6(3):255–312. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intjchrb6&id=267&collection=journals&index=journals/intjchrb
90.
Howe RB, Covell K. Child Poverty in Canada and the Rights of the Child. Human Rights Quarterly. 2003;25(4):1067–87.
91.
UNCRC, General Comment 1 [Internet]. Available from: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G01/412/53/PDF/G0141253.pdf?OpenElement
92.
Harris N. Chapter 4: Equality of access to education. In: Education, law and diversity [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2007. p. 141–86. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_65226.pdf
93.
Lundy L. Children’s rights and educational policy in Europe: the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Oxford Review of Education. 2012 Aug;38(4):393–411.
94.
Tinker v. Des Moines Sch. Dist. - 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
95.
Allan J, I’Anson J. Children’s Rights in School: Power, Assemblies and Assemblages. International Journal of Children’s Rights [Internet]. 2004;12(2):123–38. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intjchrb12&id=131&collection=journals&index=journals/intjchrb
96.
Johnson R. The Child’s Right to an Education: ‘Consensus-Minus-One’? International Journal of Children’s Rights [Internet]. 2010;18(2):185–216. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intjchrb18&id=193&collection=journals&index=journals/intjchrb
97.
Beiter KD. Chapter 2: History and nature of the right to education. In: The protection of the right to education by international law: including a systematic analysis of Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights [Internet]. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2006. p. 17–46. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_65224.pdf
98.
Daniel Monk. Theorising Education Law and Childhood: Constructing the Ideal Pupil. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2000;21(3):355–70.
99.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. General comment No. 3 (2003): HIV/AIDS and the rights of the children.
100.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. General comment No. 4: Adolescent health and development in the context of the Convention on the Rights of the Child [Internet]. Vol. 2003. Available from: http://tb.ohchr.org/default.aspx?Symbol=CRC/GC/2003/4
101.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. General comment No. 15 (2013) on the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health (art. 24)* [Internet]. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/comments.htm
102.
House of Lords. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA [1985] 3 W.L.R. 830[1986] A.C. 112. 1985.
103.
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Medical Treatment) (No.1 ). 2001.
104.
Freeman M. Rethinking Gillick. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2005;13(1–2):201–17.
105.
Tobin J. Chapter 7: Specific measures required to secure the right to health. In: The right to health in international law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 254–85. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_65285.pdf
106.
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (‘The Beijing Rules’).
107.
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. General comment no. 10 (2007) Children’s rights in juvenile justice.
108.
Supreme Court of the United States. Miller v. Alabama 567 U.S ___ (2012).
109.
HC v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 982 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/media/judgments/2013/oao-hc-a-child-v-sshd-judgment
110.
Freeman, Michael D. A. The moral status of children: essays on the rights of the child. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1997.
111.
Steinberg L. The influence of neuroscience on US Supreme Court decisions about adolescents’ criminal culpability. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013 Jun 12;14(7):513–8.
112.
Schabas, William, Sax, Helmut. Article 37: prohibition of torture, death penalty, life imprisonment and deprivation of liberty. Vol. A commentary on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff; 2006.
113.
Schabas W, Sax H. Scope of article 37(b), (c), (d). In: Article 37: prohibition of torture, death penalty, life imprisonment and deprivation of liberty [Internet]. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2006. p. 51–95. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_65339.pdf
114.
Goldson B, Kilkelly U. International human rights standards and child imprisonment: Potentialities and limitations. International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2013 Jan 1;21(2):345–71.
115.
The Supreme Court. ZH (Tanzania) (FC) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department. Vol. UKSC 4, The Supreme Court [decided cases]. 2011.
116.
General Comment No. 6 (2005): Treatment of Unaccompanied and Separated Children Outside Their Country of Origin [Internet]. Available from: http://tb.ohchr.org/default.aspx?Symbol=CRC/GC/2005/6
117.
Guidelines on International Protection No. 8: Child Asylum Claims under Articles 1(A)2 and 1(F) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees [Internet]. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/4b2f4f6d2.html
118.
Pobjoy JM. A Child Rights Framework for Assessing the Status of Refugee Children [Internet]. University of Cambridge; 2013. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2304601
119.
• Kim v Canada (Minister for Citizenship and Immigration) 2010 FC 149; [2011] 2 FCR 448. [Internet]. Available from: http://reports.fja-cmf.gc.ca/eng/2011/2010fc149.html
120.
Minow M. Making waves. In: In Brown’s wake: legacies of America’s educational landmark [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 69–95. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_69128.pdf
121.
Committee on the Rights of the Child. General comment no. 11. Indigenous children and their rights under the Convention [Internet]. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/GC.11_indigenous_New.pdf
122.
57325/00 D.H and others v The Czech Republic.
123.
Akermark SS. Chapter 2: Images of children in education: a critical reading of DH and others v. Czech Republic. In: Diversity and European human rights: rewriting judgments of the ECHR [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 40–67. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_69045.pdf
124.
Blackstock C. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on First Nations Child Welfare: Why if Canada wins, equality and justice lose. Children and Youth Services Review. 2011 Jan;33(1):187–94.
125.
Minow, Martha. In Brown’s wake: legacies of America’s educational landmark. Vol. Law and current events masters. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
126.
Monk D. Challenging homophobic bullying in schools: the politics of progress. International Journal of Law in Context. 2011 Apr 27;7(02):181–207.
127.
Ames P. Language, culture and identity in the transition to primary school: Challenges to indigenous children’s rights to education in Peru. International Journal of Educational Development. 2012 May;32(3):454–62.
128.
Bell-Booth R, Staton S, Thorpe K. Getting There, Being There, Staying and Belonging: A Case Study of Two Indigenous Australian Children’s Transition to School. Children & Society. 2012 Mar;
129.
Harris-Short, Sonia. Aboriginal child welfare, self-government and the rights of indigenous children: protecting the vulnerable under international law. Farnham: Ashgate; 2012.
130.
Kilkelly U. The Best of Both Worlds for Children’s Rights? Interpreting the European Convention on Human Rights in the Light of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Human Rights Quarterly. 2001;23(2):308–26.
131.
Stalford, Helen. Children and the European Union: rights, welfare and accountability. Vol. Modern studies in European law. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
132.
European Convention on the Exercise of Children’s Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/160.htm
133.
Mazurek v. France, Application No. 34406/97 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.humanrights.is/the-human-rights-project/humanrightscasesandmaterials/cases/regionalcases/europeancourtofhumanrights/nr/583
134.
Godelli v Italy [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-113460#%7B%2522itemid%2522:%5B%2522001-113460%2522%5D%7D
135.
African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child.
136.
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.
137.
Olowu ’Dejo. Protecting Children’s Rights in Africa: A Critique of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2002;10(2):127–36.
138.
Bonthuys E. Realizing South African Children’s Basic Socio-Economic Claims Against Parents And The State: What Courts Can Achieve. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2008 Sep 30;22(3):333–55.
139.
American Convention on Human Rights.
140.
Feria Tinta M. Introduction. In: The landmark rulings of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the rights of the child: protecting the most vulnerable at the edge [Internet]. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2008. p. 1–11. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_65306.pdf
141.
Feria Tinta M. Chapter 2: Children as true legal persons. In: The landmark rulings of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the rights of the child: protecting the most vulnerable at the edge [Internet]. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2008. p. 35–54. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG037_65308.pdf
142.
Feria Tinta M. Chapter 3 : First International Law cases concerning the protection of children in times of war in the world. In: The landmark rulings of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the rights of the child: protecting the most vulnerable at the edge. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2008. p. 155–208.
143.
Case of the ‘Street Children’ (Villagran-Morales et al.) v. Guatemala.
144.
Butler I d. J. The Rights of the Child in the Case Law of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Recent Cases. Human Rights Law Review. 2005 Jan 1;5(1):151–67.
145.
Reynaert D, Bouverne-de-Bie M, Vandevelde S. A review of children’s rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Childhood. 2009 Nov 18;16(4):518–34.
146.
Mauras M. Public policies and child rights: Entering the third decade of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2011;633(1):52–65.
147.
Anne Bentley K. Can there be any universal children’s rights? The International Journal of Human Rights. 2005 Mar;9(1):107–23.
148.
Veerman P. The Ageing of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The International Journal of Children’s Rights. 2010 Nov 1;18(4):585–618.
149.
Parmar, Sharanjeet, Harvard Law School, UNICEF. Children and transitional justice: truth-telling, accountability and reconciliation. Cambridge, Mass: Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School; 2010.
