1
Gilliland AJ, Caswell M. Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science Published Online First: 7 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z
2
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Manual of archive administration. 1922. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
3
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: : F.W. Cheshire 1956. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
5
Sue McKemmish. Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In: Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005. 1–20.
6
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist 2007;70:315–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
7
Upward F. Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal 2000;10:115–39. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007259
8
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist 2008;71:118–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2
9
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
10
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record. The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. [Stockholm]: : Riksarkivet 1998.
11
Wooldridge JM. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 5th ed. Mason, Ohio: : South-Western Cengage Learning 2013.
12
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth. The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science 2006;6:13–68. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
13
Atherton, Jay. From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria 1985.
14
Kahle B. Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist 2007;70:23–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845
15
Craven, Louise. What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497
16
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, et al. International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. Padova: : CLEUP 2008.
17
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: : Libraries Unlimited 2010.
18
Heather M. Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record. 2000.
19
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia. The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Clayton: : Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives 1994.
20
Sue M. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology). 1997.
21
Jennifer M. Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence.
22
Menne-Haritz, Angelika. Business processes: an archival science approach to collaborative decision making, records, and knowledge management. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004.
23
Pearce-Moses R. Janus in Cyberspace: Archives on the Threshold of the Digital Era. The American Archivist 2007;70:13–22. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.n7121165223j6t83
24
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science 2002;2:1–19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
25
Trace CB. What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science 2002;2:137–59. doi:10.1007/BF02435634
26
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties. 1996.
27
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
28
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
29
Yeo G. Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal 2011;21:8–27. doi:10.1108/09565691111125071
30
Yeo G. ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science 2010;10:85–116.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-010-9119-9
31
Ketelaar E. Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science 2012;12:19–33. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5
32
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly 2010;27:312–21. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006
33
Moss M. The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review 2005;120:577–92. doi:10.1093/ehr/cei121
34
McKemmish S, Piggott M. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria 2013;76.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
35
Gilliland A, Flinn A. Community Archives: What are we really talking about? In: Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf
36
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23257962.2013.859573
37
Duchein M. The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist 1992;55:14–25. doi:10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888
38
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science 2010;10:353–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
39
McKemmish S. Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
40
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005.
41
McKemmish S, Piggott M. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria 2013;76.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
42
WORTHY B. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance 2010;23:561–82. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
43
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
44
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: : Tottel 2005.
45
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
46
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:151–76. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
47
Flinn A. Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011. 145–69.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
48
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: : Quorum Books 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
49
Flinn, Andrew, Jones, Harriet. Introduction. In: Freedom of information: open access, empty archives? London: : Routledge 2009. 1–6.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ab7e6e60-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
50
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: : Libraries Unlimited 2010.
51
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
52
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
53
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2009;30:227–48. doi:10.1080/00379810903445000
54
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:125–38. doi:10.1080/00379810701607736
55
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl. Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. London: : University of Toronto Press 2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879
56
McLeod J. Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal 2012;22:92–7. doi:10.1108/09565691211268711
57
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal 2011;21:122–34. doi:10.1108/09565691111152053
58
Bailey S, Vidyarthi J. Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Records Management Journal 2010;20:279–90. doi:10.1108/09565691011095300
59
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
60
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:83–109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
61
Leighton John J. Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. 2010.
62
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
63
Roy L, Trace C, Gilbert S. Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. 2013.http://library.ifla.org/108/
64
Riley T. Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs. 2009.http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf
65
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science 2011;11:211–39. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
66
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist 2011;74:185–210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
67
Thorpe K. Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. 2013.http://library.ifla.org/99/
68
Krebs AB. Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science 2012;12:173–90. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2
69
Hawkins DT. Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Medford, N.J.: : Information Today, Inc 2013.
70
Cooper D. House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science Published Online First: 16 July 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8
71
Mortensen P. The Place of Theory in Archival Practice. 1999.
72
Cook, Terry. What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria 1997;:17–63.
73
Anne G. The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html
74
International Council on Archives. Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria 1992;1.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11837/12789
75
Groth P, Gil Y, Cheney J, et al. Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation 2012;7. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213
76
Duranti L. From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
77
Millar L. The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
78
MacNeil H. Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
79
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1. 1989.
80
Ketelaar E. Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
81
Cook, Terry. The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria 1993;35.
82
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., et al. Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2003.
83
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden. The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. [Stockholm]: : Swedish National Archives 1994.
84
Brothman B. Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice. 1991.
85
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense of Professional Rebirth:Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives.
86
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2. 1989.
87
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3. 1990.
88
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4. 1990.
89
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5. 1991.
90
Duranti, Luciana. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Lanham, Md: : Scarecrow Press 1998.
91
Duranti L. Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
92
Duranti L, MacNeil H. The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
93
Eastwood T. Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies. 1993.
94
Eastwood T. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
95
Horsman P. The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
96
MacNeil H. Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
97
Nesmith T. Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory. 1999.
98
Ridener, John. From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Duluth, Minn: : Litwin Books 2009.
99
Roberts J. Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
100
Roberts J. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
101
Duranti L. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal 2010;20:78–95. doi:10.1108/09565691011039852
102
Cumming K. Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal 2010;20:41–52. doi:10.1108/09565691011036224
103
Mak B. On the Uses of Authenticity. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688
104
Geoffrey Yeo. The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691
105
Yeo G. Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713
106
Zhang J. Original Order in Digital Archives. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719
107
O’Meara E, Tuomala M. Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693
108
Fear K, Donaldson DR. Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science 2012;12:319–39. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7
109
Bazerman C. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science 2012;12:377–88. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
110
Bunn J. Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science Published Online First: 12 March 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2
111
Stan Godlovitch. Preserving, Restoring, Repairing. Journal of Aesthetic Education 1989;23:39–47. doi:10.2307/3332759
112
Cumming K, Picot A. Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:133–45. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926824
113
Cook T. ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2011;32:173–89. doi:10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
114
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf. https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20
115
Schellenberg TR. The Appraisal of Modern Records.
116
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
117
Cook T. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science 2006;5:101–61. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2
118
Booms H. Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources. 1987.
119
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science 2013;13:207–16. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
120
Abraham T. Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist 1991;54:44–52. doi:10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
121
Boles F, Young J. Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist 1985;48:121–40. doi:10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw
122
Williams C. Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
123
Cox R. The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
124
Bailey C. Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742
125
Cynthia K. Sauer. Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist 2001;64:308–49.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
126
Wisniewski Timothy. Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image 2008;7:1–24. doi:10.1353/mov.2008.0002
127
Mancuso L. Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts 2013;41:146–59. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.801101
128
Harvey R, Thompson D. Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech 2010;28:313–22. doi:10.1108/07378831011047703
129
The Almost Accidental Archive and its Impact on Literary Subjects and Canonicity. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes 2007;40:96–108.http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_canadian_studies/v040/40.2tector.html
130
Cook M. Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal 2010;20:72–7. doi:10.1108/09565691011039843
131
Kim Y, Ross S. Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2013;50:1–10. doi:10.1002/meet.14505001042
132
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends 2009;57:490–515. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0049
133
Eastwood T. Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
134
Pollard R. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review.
135
Carvalho C. Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal 2001;11:175–205. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007274
136
Jones S, Abbott D, Ross S. Redefining the performing arts archive. Archival Science 2009;9:165–71. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9086-1
137
FORTIER N. Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science 2005;5:343–60. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z
138
Kärberg T. Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science Published Online First: 13 September 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z
139
Conway P. Digital transformations and the archival nature of surrogates. Archival Science Published Online First: 20 April 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9219-z
140
Sims F. A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal 2002;12:8–13. doi:10.1108/09565690210427743
141
Cox, Richard J. No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Lanham, Md: : Scarecrow Press 2004.
142
Boles, Frank. Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2005.
143
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa. Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2011.
144
Arias PB. Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal 2008;18:205–20. doi:10.1108/09565690810916456
145
Samuels H. Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria 1991;33.
146
Jonker AEM. No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2009;30:67–80. doi:10.1080/00379810903264625
147
SCOTT M. Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal 1997;7:101–14. doi:10.1108/eb027107
148
Tschan R. A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist 2002;65:176–95. doi:10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
149
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science 2013;13:207–16. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
150
Cox R, Samuels H. The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist 1988;51:28–42. doi:10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8
151
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. 2007.
152
Alexander P, Samuels H. The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist 1987;50:518–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u
153
Honer E, Graham S. Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
154
Kretzschmar R. Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science 2006;5:219–38. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y
155
Craig, Barbara Lazenby. Archival appraisal: theory and practice. München: : K.G. Saur 2004.
156
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation. https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html
157
Vilar P, Sauperl A. Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management 2015;35:551–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001
158
Jenkinson H. A manual of archive administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries 1965.
159
Reed B. Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:123–32. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926823
160
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. 2012. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
161
Duff WM, Harris V. Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science 2002;2:263–85. doi:10.1007/BF02435625
162
Huvila I. Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science 2008;8:15–36. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
163
Duranti L. Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria 1992;35.https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf
164
Menne-Haritz A. Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science 2001;1:57–82. doi:10.1007/BF02435639
165
Yakel E. Archival representation. Archival Science 2003;3:1–25. doi:10.1007/BF02438926
166
Clough P, Tang J, Hall MM, et al. Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings 2011;63:127–47. doi:10.1108/00012531111135628
167
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: : F.W. Cheshire 1956.
168
Bunn J. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records 2013;:1–13. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
169
Ruddock B. Linked Data and the LOCAH project. Business Information Review 2011;28:105–11. doi:10.1177/0266382111404013
170
The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model.
171
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, et al. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:397–419. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
172
Eito-Brun R. Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science Published Online First: 2 February 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3
173
Council of Europe. Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. 2003.
174
Niu J. Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science Published Online First: 13 June 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4
175
Gracy KF. Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science Published Online First: 27 February 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2
176
Valge J, Kibal B. Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:193–214. doi:10.1080/00379810701611951
177
Blais G. Access to Archival Records: A Review of Current Issues: A RAMP Study. 1995.
178
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
179
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. doi:[object Object]
180
The National Archives. The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
181
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205). 2009.
182
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology). 1996.
183
Barbara Reed. Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping.
184
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist 2011;74:185–210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
185
Flanagan M, Carini P. How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist 2012;75:514–37. doi:10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4
186
Duff W, Johnson C. Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist 2003;66:79–95. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
187
Prom C. Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist 2011;74:158–84. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v
188
Fear K. User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist 2010;73:26–60. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551
189
Daniels M, Yakel E. Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist 2010;73:535–68. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357
190
Altman B, Nemmers J. The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist 2001;64:121–31. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74
191
Yakel E, Bost LL. Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivisthttp://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870
192
Yakel E, Torres D. AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist 2003;66:51–78. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
193
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
194
Daines JG, Nimer CL. Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization 2011;9:4–31. doi:10.1080/15332748.2011.574019
195
Sexton A, Turner C, Yeo G, et al. Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:33–49. doi:10.1080/0037981042000199133
196
Chapman A. Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:149–55. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271475
197
Hill A. Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2004;25:139–48. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271466
198
Guide to archival software.
199
Scanlan K. ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist 2011;74.http://www.jstor.org/stable/23079045?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
200
Procter M. What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2010;31:15–27. doi:10.1080/00379811003658476
201
Broady-Preston J. The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management 2010;31:66–78. doi:10.1108/01435121011013412
202
Neazor M. Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. Published Online First: 2007.http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390
203
Dingwall G. Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist 2004;67:11–30. doi:10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4
204
Ismail A, Jamaludin A. Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal 2011;21:69–75. doi:10.1108/09565691111125116
205
Cline S. ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist 2009;72:331–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14
206
Gale C. Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2006;27:17–27. doi:10.1080/00039810600691221
207
Shepherd, Elizabeth. Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In: Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: : Ashgate 2009. doi:https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186
208
Jenkinson, Hilary. The English archivist: a new profession. London: : H.K. Lewis 1948.
209
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science Published Online First: 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
210
Elizabeth G, Rebecca S. ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival
211
Currall J, Moss M. We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal 2008;18:69–91. doi:10.1108/09565690810858532
212
McLeod J, Hare C. Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal 2010;20:9–40. doi:10.1108/09565691011036215
213
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists. Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2003.
214
Cook M. Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2006;27:1–15. doi:10.1080/00039810600691205
215
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: : Facet 2006.
216
Danielson, Elena S. The ethical archivist. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2010.
217
MacNeil, Heather. Without consent: the ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. [Chicago, Ill.]: : Scarecrow Press 1992.
218
Procter, Margaret, Lewis, C. P., Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies. New directions in archival research. Liverpool: : Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies 2000.
219
Shepherd E. Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: : Ashgate 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922
220
Gauld C. Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science Published Online First: 12 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4
221
Brothman B. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria 1999;48.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894
222
Cook T. Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies 2007.
223
Greene M. A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist 2013;76:302–34. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.14744l214663kw43
224
Jimerson R. Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist 2013;76:335–45. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
225
Caswell M. Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist 2013;76.http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74
226
Bastian J. Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria 2002.
227
Matthews RJ. Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science Published Online First: 13 June 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2
228
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria 2001;51.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
229
Harris V. Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria 1997;44.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217
230
MacNeil H. Trust and professional identity: narratives, counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities. Archival Science 2011;11:175–92. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9150-5
231
Duranti L. Archives as place. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Researchhttp://archivo.cartagena.es/files/36-165-DOC_FICHERO1/07-duranti_archives.pdf
232
Gilliland A. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science 2011;11:193–209. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0
233
Duff WM, Flinn A, Suurtamm KE, et al. Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science 2013;13. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
234
Evans J, McKemmish S, Daniels E, et al. Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science 2015;15:337–68. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6
235
Sellie A, Goldstein J, Fair M, et al. Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science 2015;15:453–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5
236
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists. Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2009.
237
Flinn A. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies 2011;7.
238
Bastian J. A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist 2001;64:96–114. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377
239
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts 2013;41:7–22. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
240
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology). 1996.
241
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts 2013;41:7–22. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
242
Tom Nesmith. Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist 2002;65.https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
243
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria 2001;51.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991
244
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science 2002;2:1–19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
245
Ham G. Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist 1981;44–3.
246
Kallberg M. Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age. Records Management Journal 2012;22:98–115. doi:10.1108/09565691211268162
247
Joseph P, Debowski S, Goldschmidt P. Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal 2012;22:57–75. doi:10.1108/09565691211222108
248
Cook T, Schwartz JM. Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science 2002;2:171–85. doi:10.1007/BF02435620
249
Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science 2001;1:3–24. doi:10.1007/BF02435636
250
Harris V. The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science 2002;2:63–86. doi:10.1007/BF02435631
251
Ketelaar E. Archives as Spaces of Memory. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:9–27. doi:10.1080/00379810802499678
252
Cline S. "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist Published Online First: 2012.https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34
253
Sachs A. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria 2006;62.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118
254
Hamilton, Carolyn. Refiguring the archive. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic 2002. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8
255
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric. Archive fever: a Freudian impression. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996.
256
Sachs HR. Reconstructing a Life: The Archival Challenges of Women’s History. Library Trends 2008;56:650–66. doi:10.1353/lib.2008.0018
257
Caswell M. Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:207–13. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0
258
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science 2014;14:249–74. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
259
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, et al. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science 2014;14:397–419. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
260
Flinn A, Alexander B. "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science 2015;15:329–35. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6
261
Buchanan A, Bastian M. Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science 2015;15:429–51. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3
262
Taavetti R. A marshall in love. Remembering and forgetting queer pasts in the Finnish archives. Archival Science Published Online First: 29 July 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9251-7
263
Dirks J. Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria 2004;57.http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554
264
Tough A. Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal 2011;21:225–36. doi:10.1108/09565691111186894
265
Cifor M. Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science Published Online First: 2 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5
266
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science 2013;13:95–120. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
267
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science 2014;14:215–29. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
268
Jacobsen T, Punzalan RL, Hedstrom ML. Invoking "collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science. Archival Science 2013;13:217–51. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4
269
Butler B. ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science 2009;9:57–69. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0
270
Greene M. The Power of Meaning: The Archival Mission in the Postmodern Age -. American Archivist 2002;65.http://archivists.metapress.com/content/l914668v881wv19n/?p=ae0ce19dfb2c403fbcddf677c12148e4&pi=3
271
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World.
272
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: : Tottel 2005.
273
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
274
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: : Libraries Unlimited 2010.
275
Meijer A. Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
276
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science Published Online First: 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
277
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
278
Halilovich H. Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science 2014;14:231–47. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z
279
Adami TA, Hunt M. Genocidal Archives: The African Context—Genocide in Rwanda. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2005;26:105–21. doi:10.1080/00039810500047557
280
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science 2014;14:249–74. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
281
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
282
Robinson G. Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor. Archival Science 2014;14:323–43. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9228-y
283
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: : Quorum Books 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
284
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: : Facet 2006.
285
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: : Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005.
286
Procter, Margaret, Cook, Michael, Williams, Caroline. Political pressure and the archival record. Chicago: : Society of American Archivists 2005.
287
Lemieux VL. The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal 2010;20:199–216. doi:10.1108/09565691011064331
288
Wamukoya J. Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal 2000;10:23–33. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007254
289
Dominy G. ‘We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it’ Archiving and Accessing the Records of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2005.
290
Hurley C. Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 2002;30.
291
Hurley C. Archivists and Accountability. 2006;34.
292
Jimerson RC. Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 2011;39.
293
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science 2015;15:369–97. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
294
Cifor M, Gilliland AJ. Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Archival Science Published Online First: 20 November 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9263-3
295
Wilson JZ, Golding F. Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science Published Online First: 5 October 2015. doi:10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3
296
Redwine G. Personal Digital Archiving. http://www.dpconline.org/advice/technology-watch-reports
297
Fryer C. Project to Production: Digital Preservation at the Houses of Parliament, 2010–2020. International Journal of Digital Curation 2015;10. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.378
298
Gilliland, Anne J. The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,;24.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/346521tf
299
Isto Huvila. The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature. http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf
300
Caswell M, Mallick S. Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts 2014;42:73–86. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.880931
301
Daniel D. Archival representations of immigration and ethnicity in North American history: from the ethnicization of archives to the archivization of ethnicity. Archival Science Published Online First: 1 August 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9209-6
302
Wakimoto DK, Bruce C, Partridge H. Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science 2013;13:293–316. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
303
Theimer K. What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist 2011;74:58–68. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666
304
Caswell M. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science 2014;14:307–22. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
305
Kärberg T. Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science 2015;15:83–95. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z
306
Ray J. Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship 2009;24:357–68. doi:10.1080/09647770903314720
307
Cunningham A. Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist 2008;71:530–43. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
308
Archival Science, Volume 8, Issue 4 - Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives and Museums in the Information Age. http://link.springer.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/journal/10502/8/4/page/1
309
Marty PF. An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly 2010;80:1–5. doi:10.1086/648549
310
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
311
Hill, Jennie. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011.
312
Lappin J. What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal 2010;20:252–64. doi:10.1108/09565691011095283
313
Cumming K, Findlay C. Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal 2010;20:265–78. doi:10.1108/09565691011095292
314
Higgins S. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation 2011;6. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
315
Lau AJ, Gilliland AJ, Anderson K. NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society 2012;15:991–1015. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404
316
Abrams S, Cruse P, Kunze J. Preservation Is Not a Place. International Journal of Digital Curation 2009;4. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v4i1.72
317
Cole J, Nolan J, Seko Y, et al. GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society 2011;13:1161–79. doi:10.1177/1461444811398032
318
Robinson H. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship 2012;27:413–29. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
319
Lee C, Tibbo H. Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
320
Elke Zobl. Cultural Production, Transnational Networking, and Critical Reflection in Feminist Zines. Signs 2009;35:1–12. doi:10.1086/599256
321
Crymble A. An Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Use by the Archival Community. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13298/14609
322
EICHHORN K. D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies 2010;39:622–46. doi:10.1080/00497878.2010.490716
323
Baker S, Huber A. Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2013;16:513–30. doi:10.1177/1367549413491721
324
Timms K. New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
325
Marsden C. Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2001;22:17–23. doi:10.1080/00379810120037469
326
Ceeney N. The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:57–71. doi:10.1080/00379810802499868
327
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. Archivaria 2007;63.
328
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science 2010;10:353–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
329
Newman J. Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2012;33:57–73. doi:10.1080/00379816.2012.666404
330
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
331
Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2010;16:59–76. doi:10.1080/13527250903441770
332
Moore S, Pell S. Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies 2010;16:255–68. doi:10.1080/13527251003775513
333
Flinn, Andrew. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. Interactions: UCLA journal of education and information studies 2011;7.http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt2490x
334
Flinn, A. The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: : Facet 2011. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
335
Flinn, A. Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 2010;16:39–51. doi:10.1177/1354856509347707
336
Flinn A, Stevens M, Shepherd E. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science 2009;9:71–86. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
337
Flinn, A., Stevens, M. "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In: Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
338
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2007;28:151–76. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
339
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: : Facet 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
340
Gray V. ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:1–8. doi:10.1080/00379810802499652
341
Flinn, A., Pick, G. Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In: Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. London: : Greater London Authority 2009. http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx
342
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists 2008;29:83–109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
343
Anderson S, Allen R. Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist 2009;72:383–400. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
344
Yaco S, Hardy BB. Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science 2013;13:253–72. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0
345
Kalfatovic MR, Kapsalis E, Spiess KP, et al. Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science 2008;8:267–77. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
346
Sinn D, Syn SY. Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science Published Online First: 14 July 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7
347
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives. Published Online First: 2012.http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
348
Ramírez M. The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3 Published Online First: 2009.http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1
349
Green LJF. Cultural heritage, archives & citizenship: 1. Critical Arts 2007;21:308–20. doi:10.1080/02560040701810073
350
Ormond-Parker L, Sloggett R. Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science 2012;12:191–212. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9154-1
351
Caswell M. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science 2014;14:307–22. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
