1.
Gilliland, A.J., Caswell, M.: Records and their imaginaries: imagining the impossible, making possible the imagined. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9259-z.
2.
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Manual of archive administration. (1922).
3.
Schellenberg, T. R.: Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire, Melbourne (1956).
5.
Sue McKemmish: Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In: Archives: recordkeeping in society. pp. 1–20. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, N.S.W. (2005).
6.
Yeo, G.: Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist. 70, 315–343 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q.
7.
Upward, F.: Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal. 10, 115–139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007259.
8.
Yeo, G.: Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist. 71, 118–143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2.
9.
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
10.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record: The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. Riksarkivet, [Stockholm] (1998).
11.
Wooldridge, J.M.: Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western Cengage Learning, Mason, Ohio (2013).
12.
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth: The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science. 6, 13–68 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7.
13.
Atherton, Jay: From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria. (1985).
14.
Kahle, B.: Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist. 70, 23–31 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845.
15.
Craven, Louise: What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008).
16.
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, Associazione nazionale archivistica italiana: International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. CLEUP, Padova (2008).
17.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry: Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited, Oxford (2010).
18.
Heather, M.: Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record, (2000).
19.
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia: The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives, Clayton (1994).
20.
Sue, M.: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology).
21.
Jennifer, M.: Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence.
22.
Menne-Haritz, Angelika: Business processes: an archival science approach to collaborative decision making, records, and knowledge management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004).
23.
Pearce-Moses, R.: Janus in Cyberspace: Archives on the Threshold of the Digital Era. The American Archivist. 70, 13–22 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.70.1.n7121165223j6t83.
24.
Schwartz, J.M., Cook, T.: Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2, 1–19 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.
25.
Trace, C.B.: What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science. 2, 137–159 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435634.
26.
Upward, Frank: Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties.
27.
Upward, Frank: Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
28.
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
29.
Yeo, G.: Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal. 21, 8–27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125071.
30.
Yeo, G.: ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality. Archival Science. 10, 85–116 (2010).
31.
Ketelaar, E.: Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science. 12, 19–33 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5.
32.
Birkinshaw, P.: Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 312–321 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006.
33.
Moss, M.: The Hutton Inquiry, the President of Nigeria and What the Butler Hoped to See. The English Historical Review. 120, 577–592 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/cei121.
34.
McKemmish, S., Piggott, M.: Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria. 76, (2013).
35.
Gilliland, A., Flinn, A.: Community Archives: What are we really talking about? In: Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University.
36.
‘Say nothing’: silenced records and the Boston College subpoenas.
37.
Duchein, M.: The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist. 55, 14–25 (1992). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888.
38.
Iacovino, L.: Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 10, 353–372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3.
39.
McKemmish, S.: Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
40.
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University: Archives: recordkeeping in society. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, N.S.W. (2005).
41.
McKemmish, S., Piggott, M.: Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria. 76, (2013).
42.
WORTHY, B.: More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance. 23, 561–582 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x.
43.
Birkinshaw, P.: Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
44.
Birkinshaw, P.: Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. Tottel, Haywards Heath (2005).
45.
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives, http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/.
46.
Flinn, A.: Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 151–176 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936.
47.
Flinn, A.: Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. pp. 145–169. Facet, London (2011).
48.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J.: Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, London (2002).
49.
Flinn, Andrew, Jones, Harriet: Introduction. In: Freedom of information: open access, empty archives? pp. 1–6. Routledge, London (2009).
50.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry: Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited, Oxford (2010).
51.
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
52.
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
53.
Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., Flinn, A.: The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 30, 227–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903445000.
54.
Shepherd, E.: Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 125–138 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701607736.
55.
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl: Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. University of Toronto Press, London (2010).
56.
McLeod, J.: Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal. 22, 92–97 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268711.
57.
Shepherd, E., Stevenson, A., Flinn, A.: Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal. 21, 122–134 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111152053.
58.
Bailey, S., Vidyarthi, J.: Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Records Management Journal. 20, 279–290 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095300.
59.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben: Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047.
60.
Hopkins, I.: Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 83–109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069.
61.
Leighton John, J.: Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1, (2010).
62.
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
63.
Roy, L., Trace, C., Gilbert, S.: Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals, http://library.ifla.org/108/.
64.
Riley, T.: Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs, http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf, (2009).
65.
McKemmish, S., Faulkhead, S., Russell, L.: Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science. 11, 211–239 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2.
66.
Christen, K.: Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 74, 185–210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.
67.
Thorpe, K.: Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field, http://library.ifla.org/99/.
68.
Krebs, A.B.: Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science. 12, 173–190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2.
69.
Hawkins, D.T.: Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Information Today, Inc, Medford, N.J. (2013).
70.
Cooper, D.: House proud: an ethnography of the BC Gay and Lesbian Archives. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9250-8.
71.
Mortensen, P.: The Place of Theory in Archival Practice.
72.
Cook, Terry: What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria. 17–63 (1997).
73.
Anne, G.: The Archival Paradigm: The Genesis and Rationales of Archival Principles and Practices: Council on Library and Information Resources, http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/archival.html.
74.
International Council on Archives: Statement of Principles Regarding Archival Description. Archivaria. 1, (1992).
75.
Groth, P., Gil, Y., Cheney, J., Miles, S.: Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation. 7, (2012). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213.
76.
Duranti, L.: From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics, http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548.
77.
Millar, L.: The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
78.
MacNeil, H.: Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
79.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1.
80.
Ketelaar, E.: Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
81.
Cook, Terry: The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria. 35, (1993).
82.
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., Vereniging van Archivarissen in Nederland: Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2003).
83.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden: The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. Swedish National Archives, [Stockholm] (1994).
84.
Brothman, B.: Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice.
85.
Cook, T.: Fashionable Nonsense of Professional Rebirth:Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives.
86.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2.
87.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3.
88.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4.
89.
Duranti, L.: Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5.
90.
Duranti, Luciana: Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Md (1998).
91.
Duranti, L.: Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
92.
Duranti, L., MacNeil, H.: The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
93.
Eastwood, T.: Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies.
94.
Eastwood, T.: What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
95.
Horsman, P.: The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
96.
MacNeil, H.: Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
97.
Nesmith, T.: Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory.
98.
Ridener, John: From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Litwin Books, Duluth, Minn (2009).
99.
Roberts, J.: Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
100.
Roberts, J.: What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
101.
Duranti, L.: Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal. 20, 78–95 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039852.
102.
Cumming, K.: Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal. 20, 41–52 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036224.
103.
Mak, B.: On the Uses of Authenticity.
104.
Geoffrey Yeo: The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection.
105.
Yeo, G.: Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age.
106.
Zhang, J.: Original Order in Digital Archives.
107.
O’Meara, E., Tuomala, M.: Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository.
108.
Fear, K., Donaldson, D.R.: Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science. 12, 319–339 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7.
109.
Bazerman, C.: The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science. 12, 377–388 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1.
110.
Bunn, J.: Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2.
111.
Stan Godlovitch: Preserving, Restoring, Repairing. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 23, 39–47 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/3332759.
112.
Cumming, K., Picot, A.: Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 133–145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926824.
113.
Cook, T.: ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 32, 173–189 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2011.619688.
114.
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf, https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20.
115.
Schellenberg, T.R.: The Appraisal of Modern Records.
116.
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
117.
Cook, T.: Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science. 5, 101–161 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2.
118.
Booms, H.: Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources.
119.
Caron, D.J., Kellerhals, A.: Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science. 13, 207–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y.
120.
Abraham, T.: Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist. 54, 44–52 (1991). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227.
121.
Boles, F., Young, J.: Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist. 48, 121–140 (1985). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw.
122.
Williams, C.: Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
123.
Cox, R.: The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
124.
Bailey, C.: Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal.
125.
Cynthia K. Sauer: Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist. 64, 308–349 (2001).
126.
Wisniewski, Timothy.: Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image. 7, 1–24 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1353/mov.2008.0002.
127.
Mancuso, L.: Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts. 41, 146–159 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.801101.
128.
Harvey, R., Thompson, D.: Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech. 28, 313–322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047703.
129.
The Almost Accidental Archive and its Impact on Literary Subjects and Canonicity. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes. 40, 96–108 (2007).
130.
Cook, M.: Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal. 20, 72–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011039843.
131.
Kim, Y., Ross, S.: Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 50, 1–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001042.
132.
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends. 57, 490–515 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0049.
133.
Eastwood, T.: Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
134.
Pollard, R.: The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review.
135.
Carvalho, C.: Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal. 11, 175–205 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007274.
136.
Jones, S., Abbott, D., Ross, S.: Redefining the performing arts archive. Archival Science. 9, 165–171 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9086-1.
137.
FORTIER, N.: Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science. 5, 343–360 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z.
138.
Kärberg, T.: Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z.
139.
Conway, P.: Digital transformations and the archival nature of surrogates. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9219-z.
140.
Sims, F.: A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal. 12, 8–13 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690210427743.
141.
Cox, Richard J.: No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Md (2004).
142.
Boles, Frank: Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2005).
143.
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa: Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2011).
144.
Arias, P.B.: Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal. 18, 205–220 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810916456.
145.
Samuels, H.: Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria. 33, (1991).
146.
Jonker, A.E.M.: No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 30, 67–80 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810903264625.
147.
SCOTT, M.: Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal. 7, 101–114 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb027107.
148.
Tschan, R.: A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist. 65, 176–195 (2002). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1.
149.
Caron, D.J., Kellerhals, A.: Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science. 13, 207–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y.
150.
Cox, R., Samuels, H.: The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist. 51, 28–42 (1988). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8.
151.
Shilton, K., Srinivasan, R.: Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections.
152.
Alexander, P., Samuels, H.: The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist. 50, 518–531 (1987). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u.
153.
Honer, E., Graham, S.: Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
154.
Kretzschmar, R.: Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science. 5, 219–238 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y.
155.
Craig, Barbara Lazenby: Archival appraisal: theory and practice. K.G. Saur, München (2004).
156.
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation, https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html.
157.
Vilar, P., Sauperl, A.: Archives, Quo Vadis et Cum Quibus?: Archivists’ self-perceptions and perceptions of users of contemporary archives. International Journal of Information Management. 35, 551–560 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.06.001.
158.
Jenkinson, H.: A manual of archive administration. Lund, Humphries (1965).
159.
Reed, B.: Reinventing access. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 123–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.926823.
160.
Eveleigh, A.: Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. (2012).
161.
Duff, W.M., Harris, V.: Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science. 2, 263–285 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435625.
162.
Huvila, I.: Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science. 8, 15–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0.
163.
Duranti, L.: Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria. 35, (1992).
164.
Menne-Haritz, A.: Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science. 1, 57–82 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435639.
165.
Yakel, E.: Archival representation. Archival Science. 3, 1–25 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02438926.
166.
Clough, P., Tang, J., Hall, M.M., Warner, A.: Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings. 63, 127–147 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111135628.
167.
Schellenberg, T. R.: Modern archives: principles and techniques. F.W. Cheshire, Melbourne (1956).
168.
Bunn, J.: Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records. 1–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/23257962.2013.830066.
169.
Ruddock, B.: Linked Data and the LOCAH project. Business Information Review. 28, 105–111 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382111404013.
170.
The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model.
171.
Wood, S., Carbone, K., Cifor, M., Gilliland, A., Punzalan, R.: Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 14, 397–419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1.
172.
Eito-Brun, R.: Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3.
173.
Council of Europe: Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum, (2003).
174.
Niu, J.: Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4.
175.
Gracy, K.F.: Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2.
176.
Valge, J., Kibal, B.: Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 193–214 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611951.
177.
Blais, G.: Access to Archival Records: A Review of Current Issues: A RAMP Study, (1995).
178.
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
179.
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. https://doi.org/[object Object].
180.
The National Archives: The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
181.
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205).
182.
Frank Upward: Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
183.
Barbara Reed: Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping.
184.
Christen, K.: Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 74, 185–210 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521.
185.
Flanagan, M., Carini, P.: How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist. 75, 514–537 (2012). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4.
186.
Duff, W., Johnson, C.: Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist. 66, 79–95 (2003). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n.
187.
Prom, C.: Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist. 74, 158–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v.
188.
Fear, K.: User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist. 73, 26–60 (2010). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551.
189.
Daniels, M., Yakel, E.: Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist. 73, 535–568 (2010). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357.
190.
Altman, B., Nemmers, J.: The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist. 64, 121–131 (2001). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74.
191.
Yakel, E., Bost, L.L.: Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivist.
192.
Yakel, E., Torres, D.: AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist. 66, 51–78 (2003). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800.
193.
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
194.
Daines, J.G., Nimer, C.L.: Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization. 9, 4–31 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15332748.2011.574019.
195.
Sexton, A., Turner, C., Yeo, G., Hockey, S.: Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 33–49 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000199133.
196.
Chapman, A.: Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 149–155 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271475.
197.
Hill, A.: Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 25, 139–148 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271466.
198.
Guide to archival software.
199.
Scanlan, K.: ARMA v. SAA: The History and Heart of Professional Friction. The American Archivist. 74, (2011).
200.
Procter, M.: What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 31, 15–27 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379811003658476.
201.
Broady-Preston, J.: The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management. 31, 66–78 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121011013412.
202.
Neazor, M.: Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. (2007).
203.
Dingwall, G.: Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist. 67, 11–30 (2004). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4.
204.
Ismail, A., Jamaludin, A.: Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal. 21, 69–75 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111125116.
205.
Cline, S.: ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist. 72, 331–343 (2009). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14.
206.
Gale, C.: Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 27, 17–27 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691221.
207.
Shepherd, Elizabeth: Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In: Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate, Farnham (2009). https://doi.org/https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186.
208.
Jenkinson, Hilary: The English archivist: a new profession. H.K. Lewis, London (1948).
209.
Strauss, A.: Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
210.
Elizabeth, G., Rebecca, S.: ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work.
211.
Currall, J., Moss, M.: We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal. 18, 69–91 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565690810858532.
212.
McLeod, J., Hare, C.: Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal. 20, 9–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011036215.
213.
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists: Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2003).
214.
Cook, M.: Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 27, 1–15 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810600691205.
215.
Cox, Richard J.: Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. Facet, London (2006).
216.
Danielson, Elena S.: The ethical archivist. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2010).
217.
MacNeil, Heather: Without consent: the ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. Scarecrow Press, [Chicago, Ill.] (1992).
218.
Procter, Margaret, Lewis, C. P., Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies: New directions in archival research. Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies, Liverpool (2000).
219.
Shepherd, E.: Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Ashgate, Farnham (2009).
220.
Gauld, C.: Democratising or privileging: the democratisation of knowledge and the role of the archivist. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9262-4.
221.
Brothman, B.: Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria. 48, (1999).
222.
Cook, T.: Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies. (2007).
223.
Greene, M.: A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist. 76, 302–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.14744l214663kw43.
224.
Jimerson, R.: Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist. 76, 335–345 (2013). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21.
225.
Caswell, M.: Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist. 76, (2013).
226.
Bastian, J.: Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria. (2002).
227.
Matthews, R.J.: Is the archivist a "radical atheist” now? Deconstruction, its new wave, and archival activism. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9248-2.
228.
Cook, T.: Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria. 51, (2001).
229.
Harris, V.: Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria. 44, (1997).
230.
MacNeil, H.: Trust and professional identity: narratives, counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities. Archival Science. 11, 175–192 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9150-5.
231.
Duranti, L.: Archives as place. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research.
232.
Gilliland, A.: Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science. 11, 193–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0.
233.
Duff, W.M., Flinn, A., Suurtamm, K.E., Wallace, D.A.: Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science. 13, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x.
234.
Evans, J., McKemmish, S., Daniels, E., McCarthy, G.: Self-determination and archival autonomy: advocating activism. Archival Science. 15, 337–368 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9244-6.
235.
Sellie, A., Goldstein, J., Fair, M., Hoyer, J.: Interference Archive: a free space for social movement culture. Archival Science. 15, 453–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9245-5.
236.
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists: Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2009).
237.
Flinn, A.: Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies. 7, (2011).
238.
Bastian, J.: A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist. 64, 96–114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377.
239.
Findlay, C.: People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 41, 7–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.779926.
240.
Frank Upward: Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
241.
Findlay, C.: People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 41, 7–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2013.779926.
242.
Tom Nesmith: Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist. 65, (2002).
243.
MacNeil, H.: Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria. 51, (2001).
244.
Schwartz, J.M., Cook, T.: Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2, 1–19 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435628.
245.
Ham, G.: Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist. 44–3, (1981).
246.
Kallberg, M.: Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age. Records Management Journal. 22, 98–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211268162.
247.
Joseph, P., Debowski, S., Goldschmidt, P.: Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal. 22, 57–75 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691211222108.
248.
Cook, T., Schwartz, J.M.: Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2, 171–185 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435620.
249.
Cook, T.: Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 1, 3–24 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636.
250.
Harris, V.: The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science. 2, 63–86 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435631.
251.
Ketelaar, E.: Archives as Spaces of Memory. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 9–27 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499678.
252.
Cline, S.: "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist. (2012).
253.
Sachs, A.: Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria. 62, (2006).
254.
Hamilton, Carolyn: Refiguring the archive. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8.
255.
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric: Archive fever: a Freudian impression. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1996).
256.
Sachs, H.R.: Reconstructing a Life: The Archival Challenges of Women’s History. Library Trends. 56, 650–666 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2008.0018.
257.
Caswell, M.: Defining human rights archives: introduction to the special double issue on archives and human rights. Archival Science. 14, 207–213 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9226-0.
258.
Gilliland, A.J.: Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 14, 249–274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3.
259.
Wood, S., Carbone, K., Cifor, M., Gilliland, A., Punzalan, R.: Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 14, 397–419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1.
260.
Flinn, A., Alexander, B.: "Humanizing an inevitability political craft”: Introduction to the special issue on archiving activism and activist archiving. Archival Science. 15, 329–335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9260-6.
261.
Buchanan, A., Bastian, M.: Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science. 15, 429–451 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9247-3.
262.
Taavetti, R.: A marshall in love. Remembering and forgetting queer pasts in the Finnish archives. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9251-7.
263.
Dirks, J.: Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria. 57, (2004).
264.
Tough, A.: Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal. 21, 225–236 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691111186894.
265.
Cifor, M.: Affecting relations: introducing affect theory to archival discourse. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9261-5.
266.
Cook, T.: Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science. 13, 95–120 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.
267.
Harris, V.: Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 14, 215–229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5.
268.
Jacobsen, T., Punzalan, R.L., Hedstrom, M.L.: Invoking "collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science. Archival Science. 13, 217–251 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4.
269.
Butler, B.: ‘Othering’ the archive—from exile to inclusion and heritage dignity: the case of Palestinian archival memory. Archival Science. 9, 57–69 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9095-0.
270.
Greene, M.: The Power of Meaning: The Archival Mission in the Postmodern Age -. American Archivist. 65, (2002).
271.
MacNeil, H.: Trusting Records in a Postmodern World.
272.
Birkinshaw, P.: Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. Tottel, Haywards Heath (2005).
273.
Birkinshaw, P.: Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
274.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry: Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Libraries Unlimited, Oxford (2010).
275.
Meijer, A.: Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
276.
Strauss, A.: Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
277.
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
278.
Halilovich, H.: Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science. 14, 231–247 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z.
279.
Adami, T.A., Hunt, M.: Genocidal Archives: The African Context—Genocide in Rwanda. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 26, 105–121 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/00039810500047557.
280.
Gilliland, A.J.: Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 14, 249–274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3.
281.
Caron, D.J., Kellerhals, A.: Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
282.
Robinson, G.: Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor. Archival Science. 14, 323–343 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9228-y.
283.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J.: Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. Quorum Books, London (2002).
284.
Cox, Richard J.: Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. Facet, London (2006).
285.
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University: Archives: recordkeeping in society. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, N.S.W. (2005).
286.
Procter, Margaret, Cook, Michael, Williams, Caroline: Political pressure and the archival record. Society of American Archivists, Chicago (2005).
287.
Lemieux, V.L.: The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal. 20, 199–216 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011064331.
288.
Wamukoya, J.: Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal. 10, 23–33 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007254.
289.
Dominy, G.: ‘We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it’ Archiving and Accessing the Records of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. (2005).
290.
Hurley, C.: Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 30, (2002).
291.
Hurley, C.: Archivists and Accountability. 34, (2006).
292.
Jimerson, R.C.: Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 39, (2011).
293.
Strauss, A.: Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. 15, 369–397 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3.
294.
Cifor, M., Gilliland, A.J.: Affect and the archive, archives and their affects: an introduction to the special issue. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9263-3.
295.
Wilson, J.Z., Golding, F.: Latent scrutiny: personal archives as perpetual mementos of the official gaze. Archival Science. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-015-9255-3.
296.
Redwine, G.: Personal Digital Archiving, http://www.dpconline.org/advice/technology-watch-reports.
297.
Fryer, C.: Project to Production: Digital Preservation at the Houses of Parliament, 2010–2020. International Journal of Digital Curation. 10, (2015). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v10i2.378.
298.
Gilliland, Anne J: The Role of Participatory Archives in Furthering Human Rights, Reconciliation and Recovery. Atlanti: Review for Modern Archival Theory and Practice,. 24,.
299.
Isto Huvila: The Unbearable Lightness of Participating? Revisiting the discourses of ’participation’ in archival literature, http://www.istohuvila.se/files/IstoHuvilaUnbearableLightnessPreprint.pdf.
300.
Caswell, M., Mallick, S.: Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 42, 73–86 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.880931.
301.
Daniel, D.: Archival representations of immigration and ethnicity in North American history: from the ethnicization of archives to the archivization of ethnicity. Archival Science. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9209-6.
302.
Wakimoto, D.K., Bruce, C., Partridge, H.: Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science. 13, 293–316 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1.
303.
Theimer, K.: What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist. 74, 58–68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666.
304.
Caswell, M.: Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science. 14, 307–322 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6.
305.
Kärberg, T.: Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science. 15, 83–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z.
306.
Ray, J.: Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship. 24, 357–368 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903314720.
307.
Cunningham, A.: Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist. 71, 530–543 (2008). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507.
308.
Archival Science, Volume 8, Issue 4 - Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives and Museums in the Information Age, http://link.springer.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/journal/10502/8/4/page/1.
309.
Marty, P.F.: An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly. 80, 1–5 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1086/648549.
310.
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4, https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4.
311.
Hill, Jennie: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet, London (2011).
312.
Lappin, J.: What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal. 20, 252–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095283.
313.
Cumming, K., Findlay, C.: Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal. 20, 265–278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/09565691011095292.
314.
Higgins, S.: Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation. 6, (2011). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191.
315.
Lau, A.J., Gilliland, A.J., Anderson, K.: NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society. 15, 991–1015 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404.
316.
Abrams, S., Cruse, P., Kunze, J.: Preservation Is Not a Place. International Journal of Digital Curation. 4, (2009). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v4i1.72.
317.
Cole, J., Nolan, J., Seko, Y., Mancuso, K., Ospina, A.: GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society. 13, 1161–1179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811398032.
318.
Robinson, H.: Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship. 27, 413–429 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2012.720188.
319.
Lee, C., Tibbo, H.: Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills, http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668.
320.
Elke Zobl: Cultural Production, Transnational Networking, and Critical Reflection in Feminist Zines. Signs. 35, 1–12 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1086/599256.
321.
Crymble, A.: An Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Use by the Archival Community, http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13298/14609.
322.
EICHHORN, K.: D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies. 39, 622–646 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2010.490716.
323.
Baker, S., Huber, A.: Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 16, 513–530 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413491721.
324.
Timms, K.: New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums, http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549.
325.
Marsden, C.: Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 22, 17–23 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810120037469.
326.
Ceeney, N.: The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 57–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499868.
327.
Shilton, K., Srinivasan, R.: Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. Archivaria. 63, (2007).
328.
Iacovino, L.: Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 10, 353–372 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3.
329.
Newman, J.: Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 33, 57–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2012.666404.
330.
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com, http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th.
331.
Stevens, M., Flinn, A., Shepherd, E.: New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16, 59–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250903441770.
332.
Moore, S., Pell, S.: Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 16, 255–268 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13527251003775513.
333.
Flinn, Andrew: Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. Interactions: UCLA journal of education and information studies. 7, (2011).
334.
Flinn, A.: The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. Facet, London (2011).
335.
Flinn, A.: Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 16, 39–51 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856509347707.
336.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M., Shepherd, E.: Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science. 9, 71–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2.
337.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M.: "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In: Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet, London (2009).
338.
Flinn, A.: Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 28, 151–176 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810701611936.
339.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben: Community archives: the shaping of memory. Facet, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047.
340.
Gray, V.: ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 1–8 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802499652.
341.
Flinn, A., Pick, G.: Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In: Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. Greater London Authority, London (2009).
342.
Hopkins, I.: Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 29, 83–109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00379810802515069.
343.
Anderson, S., Allen, R.: Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist. 72, 383–400 (2009). https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416.
344.
Yaco, S., Hardy, B.B.: Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science. 13, 253–272 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0.
345.
Kalfatovic, M.R., Kapsalis, E., Spiess, K.P., Camp, A., Edson, M.: Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science. 8, 267–277 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y.
346.
Sinn, D., Syn, S.Y.: Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7.
347.
Eveleigh, A.: Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives. (2012).
348.
Ramírez, M.: The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3. (2009).
349.
Green, L.J.F.: Cultural heritage, archives & citizenship: 1. Critical Arts. 21, 308–320 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/02560040701810073.
350.
Ormond-Parker, L., Sloggett, R.: Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science. 12, 191–212 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9154-1.
351.
Caswell, M.: Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science. 14, 307–322 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6.
