1
Butler J. Gender Trouble. Routledge 2011. doi:10.4324/9780203824979
2
Martin E. The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. [Rev. ed.]. Boston: : Beacon Press 2001.
3
Hochschild AR, Machung A. The second shift: working families and the revolution at home. New York, N.Y.: : Penguin Books 2012.
4
Weeks J. Sex, politics and society: the regulation of sexuality since 1800. Fourth edition. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2017.
5
Ahmed S. Feminist Killjoys (And Other Willful Subjects). The Scholar & Feminist Online 2010;8.http://sfonline.barnard.edu/polyphonic/ahmed_01.htm
6
Brannen J, Mooney A, Moss P, et al. Working and caring over the twentieth century: change and continuity in four-generation families. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2004.
7
Browne J, editor. The Future of Gender. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2007.
8
Butler J. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: : Routledge 1999. https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203902752
9
Connell RW. Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1987.
10
Connell RW. Masculinities. Cambridge: : Polity 1995.
11
Crenshaw, K. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989;:139–67.https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/uchclf1989&i=143
12
Beauvoir S de, Parshley HM. The second sex. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1972.
13
Dell HS. ‘Ordinary’ Sex, Prostitutes, and Middle-Class Wives: Liberalisation and National Identity in India. In: Sex in development: science, sexuality, and morality in global perspective. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2005. 187–206.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386414
14
Deutsch FM. Undoing Gender. Gender & Society 2007;21:106–27. doi:10.1177/0891243206293577
15
Evans M. Gender and social theory. Buckingham: : Open University P. 2003.
16
Firestone S. The dialectic of sex. In: The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution. London: : Paladin 1972. 11–22.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b6040cf6-2339-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
17
Friedan B. The feminine mystique. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1965.
18
Hernández Castillo RA. The Emergence of Indigenous Feminism in Latin America. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 2010;35:539–45. doi:10.1086/648538
19
Hines S, Sanger T. Transgender identities: towards a social analysis of gender diversity. New York: : Routledge 2010. http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=645098
20
Hochschild AR. The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling. Updated with a new preface. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2012.
21
Holland J. The male in the head: young people, heterosexuality and power. London: : Tufnell P. 1998.
22
Jackson S, Scott S. Faking Like a Woman? Towards an Interpretive Theorization of Sexual Pleasure. Body & Society 2007;13:95–116. doi:10.1177/1357034X07077777
23
Jackson S, Scott S. Gender: a sociological reader. London: : Routledge 2002.
24
Kabeer N. Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development 2005;13:13–24. doi:10.1080/13552070512331332273
25
Lewis R, Mills S. Feminist postcolonial theory: a reader. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2003.
26
Lorde A. The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. In: Sister outsider: essays and speeches. Berkeley: : Crossing Press 2007.
27
Mahmood S. Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology 2001;16:202–36. doi:10.1525/can.2001.16.2.202
28
Martin E. The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction. [Rev. ed.]. Boston: : Beacon Press 2001.
29
McRobbie A. The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2009. https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=a0d9f414-1ed4-4d67-a8c0-f5480921dfaa%40redis&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHNoaWImc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#AN=595715&db=nlebk
30
Mitter S. Common fate, common bond: women in the global economy. London: : Pluto 1986.
31
Molyneux M. Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme. Social Policy and Administration 2006;40:425–49. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00497.x
32
Oakley A. The Ann Oakley reader: gender, women and social science. Bristol: : Policy Press 2005.
33
Mitchell J, Oakley A. Who’s afraid of feminism?: seeing through the backlash. London: : Penguin 1997.
34
Oyěwùmí O. The invention of women: making an African sense of Western gender discourses. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 1997. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt0vh
35
Phipps A. The politics of the body: gender in a neoliberal and neoconservative age. Cambridge, UK: : Polity 2014.
36
Ryan-Flood R. Lesbian motherhood: Gender, families and sexual citizenship. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057%2F9780230234444
37
Skeggs B. Formations of class and gender: becoming respectable. London: : SAGE 1997.
38
Spivak GC. Can the subaltern speak. 1988. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=584675&site=ehost-live&scope=site
39
Sydie RA. Natural women, cultured men: a feminist perspective on sociological theory. Milton Keynes: : Open University Press 1987.
40
Thorne B. Re-visioning women and social change: Where are the children? Gender & Society 1987;1:85–109. doi:10.1177/089124387001001005
41
Varley A, Blasco M. Exiled to the home: Masculinity and ageing in urban Mexico. The European Journal of Development Research 2000;12:115–38. doi:10.1080/09578810008426768
42
Walby S. Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford, UK: : B. Blackwell 1990.
43
West C, Zimmerman DH. Doing Gender. Gender & Society 1987;1:125–51. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002
44
Andermahr S, Lovell T, Wolkowitz C. A concise glossary of feminist theory. London: : Arnold 1997.
45
Barrett M, Phillips A. Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1992.
46
Charles N. Gender in modern Britain. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2002.
47
Jackson S, Scott S. Gender: a sociological reader. London: : Routledge 2002.
48
Pilcher J, Whelehan I. Fifty key concepts in gender studies. London: : SAGE Publications 2004.
49
Robinson V, Richardson D, editors. Introducing gender and women’s studies. Fourth edition. London: : Palgrave 2015.
50
Wharton AS. The sociology of gender: an introduction to theory and research. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2005.
51
Whelehan I. Modern feminist thought: from the second wave to ‘post-feminism’. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 1995.
52
Oakley A. Chapter 6: Sex and Gender. In: Sex, gender and society. Aldershot: : Gower 1985. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=00baeff7-74e2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
53
Oakley A. A Brief History of Gender. In: Who’s afraid of feminism?: seeing through the backlash. London: : Penguin 1997. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e39b0113-db28-eb11-80cd-005056af4099
54
Fausto-Sterling A. Chapter 1: Dueling Dualisms. In: Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: : Basic Books 2000. 1–29.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4028047c-d228-eb11-80cd-005056af4099
55
Oakley A. Housewife. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1976.
56
Moral Maze: Defining Gender. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09dz416
57
Williams J. Preface. In: Women vs feminism: why we all need liberating from the gender wars. United Kingdom: : Emerald Publishing 2017. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ee5de4b4-ebf9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
58
Williams J. Chapter 10: Being a woman. In: Women vs feminism: why we all need liberating from the gender wars. United Kingdom: : Emerald Publishing 2017. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3d6d0528-ebf9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
59
Williams J. Chapter 11: Conclusions. In: Women vs feminism: why we all need liberating from the gender wars. United Kingdom: : Emerald Publishing 2017. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=61abc477-ebf9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
60
Engels F, Leacock EB, West A. The origin of the family, private property and the state: in the light of the researches of Lewis H. Morgan. London: : Lawrence and Wishart 1972. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/index.htm
61
Firestone S. Chapter 1: The Dialectic of Sex. In: The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution. London: : Paladin 1972. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ee726779-78e2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
62
Beauvoir S de, Parshley HM. The second sex. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1972.
63
Friedan B. The feminine mystique. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1965.
64
Ackerly B, True J. Back to the future: Feminist theory, activism, and doing feminist research in an age of globalization. Women’s Studies International Forum 2010;33:464–72. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2010.06.004
65
Butler J. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 1988;40. doi:10.2307/3207893
66
Kulick D. The Gender of Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes. American Anthropologist 1997;99:574–85. doi:10.1525/aa.1997.99.3.574
67
Butler J. Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual? In: Undoing gender. New York: : Routledge 2004. 102–30.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f7318219-6464-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
68
Butler J. Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: : Routledge 1993. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781136807183
69
Djupvik MB. Welcome to the candy shop! Conflicting representations of black masculinity. Popular Music 2014;33:209–24. doi:10.1017/S0261143014000312
70
Shields SA. Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective. Sex Roles 2008;59:301–11. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8
71
Brah A, Phoenix A. Ain’t I A Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies 2004;5.http://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1543&context=jiws
72
Yuval-Davis N. Chapter 1: Theorizing gender and nation. In: Gender & nation. London: : Sage 1997. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a6ab58bc-9ee4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
73
Ahmed S. Introduction: Stranger fetishism and post-coloniality. In: Strange encounters: embodied others in post-coloniality. London: : Routledge 2000. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=50588de3-f4e3-e711-80cd-005056af4099
74
Bürkner H-J. Intersectionality: How Gender Studies Might Inspire the Analysis of Social Inequality among Migrants. Population, Space and Place 2012;18:181–95. doi:10.1002/psp.664
75
Nagel J. Masculinity and nationalism: gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies 1998;21:242–69. doi:10.1080/014198798330007
76
Nagel J. Ethnicity and Sexuality. Annual Review of Sociology 2000;26:107–33. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.107
77
Pryke S. Nationalism and Sexuality, What are the Issues? Nations and Nationalism 1998;4:529–46. doi:10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00529.x
78
Sylvia Walby. Woman and Nation. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 1992;33:81–100. doi:10.1163/002071592X00068
79
Yuval-Davis N, Anthias F, Campling J. Woman, nation, state. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Macmillan 1989.
80
Gill R. Post-postfeminism?: new feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies 2016;16:610–30. doi:10.1080/14680777.2016.1193293
81
Ging D. Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities Published Online First: 10 May 2017. doi:10.1177/1097184X17706401
82
Berridge S, Portwood-Stacer L. Introduction: Feminism, Hashtags and Violence Against Women and Girls. Feminist Media Studies 2015;15:341–341. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1008743
83
Jane EA. ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum 2014;28:558–70. doi:10.1080/10304312.2014.924479
84
Moi T. ‘I Am Not a Feminist, But...’: How Feminism Became the F-Word. PMLA 2006;121:1735–41. doi:10.1632/pmla.2006.121.5.1735
85
Munro E. Feminism: A Fourth Wave? Political Insight 2013;4:22–5. doi:10.1111/2041-9066.12021
86
Zizi Papacharissi. Without You, I’m Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter. International Journal of Communication 2012;6.http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1484/775
87
Peay, Pythia. Feminism’s Fourth Wave. Utne;:59–60.https://search.proquest.com/docview/217420035?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
88
Jane EA. ‘Back to the kitchen, cunt’: speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny. Continuum 2014;28:558–70. doi:10.1080/10304312.2014.924479
89
Connell RW. Chapter 6: Gender Regimes and the Gender Order. In: Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: : Polity Press 1987. 119–42.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0f33a75e-6ee2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
90
Gavison R. Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction. Stanford Law Review 1992;45. doi:10.2307/1228984
91
Chappell L. The State and Governance. Oxford University Press 2013. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.013.0024
92
Pateman C. Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy. In: The disorder of women: democracy, feminism and political theory. Cambridge: : Polity 1989.
93
Hearn J, McKie L. Gendered policy and policy on gender: the case of ‘domestic violence’. Policy & Politics 2008;36:75–91. doi:10.1332/030557308783431634
94
Boyd SB. Challenging the public/private divide: an overview. In: Challenging the public/private divide: feminism, law, and public policy. Toronto: : University of Toronto Press 1997. 3–34.https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442672819
95
Bacchi C. Policies as Gendering Practices: Re-Viewing Categorical Distinctions. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 2017;38:20–41. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198207
96
Craske N. Remasculinisation and the neoliberal state in Latin America. In: Gender, politics and the state. London: : Routledge 1998. 100–20.
97
Hearn J. Reflecting on men and social policy: Contemporary critical debates and implications for social policy. Critical Social Policy 2010;30:165–88. doi:10.1177/0261018309358288
98
Lombardo E, Meier P, Verloo M. Policymaking from a Gender+ Equality Perspective. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 2017;38:1–19. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198206
99
Okin S. Gender, the Public and the Private. In: Feminism and politics. Oxford: : Oxford UP 1998. 116–41.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0f89e4e0-cd41-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
100
Pateman C. The Patriarchal Welfare State. In: Feminism, the public and the private. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1998. 241–76.
101
Pateman C. Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy. In: The disorder of women: democracy, feminism and political theory. Cambridge: : Polity 1989. http://readinglists.ucl.ac.uk/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontentstore.cla.co.uk%2F%2Fsecure%2Flink%3Fid%3D86b9c300-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099&sig=3d563dd4ae65719f2e0081c7f9996f0ed099023fad673cb8b22c2e3a0e0f4f72
102
Uberoi P. Feminism and the public–private distinction. In: The public and the private: issues of democratic citizenship. New Delhi: : Sage Publications 2003. 205–28.
103
Hammack PL. The Life Course Development of Human Sexual Orientation: An Integrative Paradigm. Human Development 2005;48:267–90. doi:10.1159/000086872
104
Tate CC, Youssef CP, Bettergarcia JN. Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology 2014;18:302–12. doi:10.1037/gpr0000019
105
van Anders SM. Beyond Sexual Orientation: Integrating Gender/Sex and Diverse Sexualities via Sexual Configurations Theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2015;44:1177–213. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8
106
Inside Transgender Pakistan. https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=Transgender+pakistan&sa_f=search-product&scope
107
Diamond LM. Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 2008;44:5–14. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.5
108
Feminism and the Politics of Childhood. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press/browse-books/feminism-and-the-politics-of-childhood
109
Hendrick H. Constructions and Reconstructions of British Childhood: An Interpretive Survey, 1800 to the Present. In: Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: : Falmer P. 1997. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745008
110
Bartholomaeus C, Senkevics AS. Accounting for Gender in the Sociology of Childhood: Reflections From Research in Australia and Brazil. SAGE Open 2015;5. doi:10.1177/2158244015580303
111
UNFPA/UNICEF. Women’s & Children’s Rights: Making the Connection. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Women-Children_final.pdf
112
Feminism and the Politics of Childhood. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press/browse-books/feminism-and-the-politics-of-childhood
113
Dermott E. ‘The “Intimate Father”: Defining Paternal Involvement’. Sociological Research Online 2003;8:1–11. doi:10.5153/sro.859
114
Ehrenreich B, Hochschild AR. Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: : Granta Books 2003.
115
Faircloth C. Chapter 1: Intensive Parenting and the Expansion of Parenting. In: Parenting culture studies. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. 25–50.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=709313b4-70e2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
116
Hochschild AR, Machung A. The second shift: working parents and the revolution at home. London: : Piatkus 1990.
117
Hakim, Catherine. Symposium: Gender and Economics. Econ Journal Watch;5.https://search.proquest.com/docview/912952813?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
118
Mary Leahy, Douhney J. Women, Work and Preference Formation: A Critique of Catherine Hakim’s Preference Theory. Journal of Law and Governance 2006;1.https://jbsge.vu.edu.au/index.php/jbsge/article/view/79/130
119
Becker G. Introduction. In: The elusive embryo: how women and men approach new reproductive technologies. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2000. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=db688752-f7e3-e711-80cd-005056af4099
120
Becker G. Chapter 14: Performing Gender. In: The elusive embryo: how women and men approach new reproductive technologies. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2000. 236–50.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=15e98e17-e762-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
121
Martin E. The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1991;16:485–501. doi:10.1086/494680
122
Franklin S. Chapter 4: It just takes over. In: Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. London: : Routledge 1997.
123
Balen F van, Inhorn MC. Infertility around the globe: new thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2002. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780520927810/
124
Pande A. Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: gifts for global sisters? Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2011;23:618–25. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.007
125
Feminism and the Politics of Childhood. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press/browse-books/feminism-and-the-politics-of-childhood
