[1]
J. Butler, Gender Trouble. Routledge, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203824979
[2]
E. Martin, The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction, [Rev. ed.]. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.
[3]
A. R. Hochschild and A. Machung, The second shift: working families and the revolution at home. New York, N.Y.: Penguin Books, 2012.
[4]
J. Weeks, Sex, politics and society: the regulation of sexuality since 1800, Fourth edition., vol. Themes in British social history. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017.
[5]
S. Ahmed, ‘Feminist Killjoys (And Other Willful Subjects)’, The Scholar & Feminist Online, vol. 8, no. 3, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://sfonline.barnard.edu/polyphonic/ahmed_01.htm
[6]
J. Brannen, A. Mooney, P. Moss, and Economic and Social Research Council, Working and caring over the twentieth century: change and continuity in four-generation families. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
[7]
J. Browne, Ed., The Future of Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
[8]
J. Butler, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203902752
[9]
R. W. Connell, Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
[10]
R. W. Connell, Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity, 1995.
[11]
Crenshaw, K., ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, no. 1989, pp. 139–167, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/uchclf1989&i=143
[12]
S. de Beauvoir and H. M. Parshley, The second sex. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.
[13]
H. S. Dell, ‘“Ordinary” Sex, Prostitutes, and Middle-Class Wives: Liberalisation and National Identity in India’, in Sex in development: science, sexuality, and morality in global perspective, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 187–206 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822386414
[14]
F. M. Deutsch, ‘Undoing Gender’, Gender & Society, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 106–127, Feb. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0891243206293577.
[15]
M. Evans, Gender and social theory. Buckingham: Open University P., 2003.
[16]
S. Firestone, ‘The dialectic of sex’, in The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution, London: Paladin, 1972, pp. 11–22 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=b6040cf6-2339-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
[17]
B. Friedan, The feminine mystique. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965.
[18]
R. A. Hernández Castillo, ‘The Emergence of Indigenous Feminism in Latin America’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 539–545, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1086/648538.
[19]
S. Hines and T. Sanger, Transgender identities: towards a social analysis of gender diversity, vol. 24. New York: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=645098
[20]
A. R. Hochschild, The managed heart: commercialization of human feeling, Updated with a new preface. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2012.
[21]
J. Holland, The male in the head: young people, heterosexuality and power. London: Tufnell P., 1998.
[22]
S. Jackson and S. Scott, ‘Faking Like a Woman? Towards an Interpretive Theorization of Sexual Pleasure’, Body & Society, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 95–116, Jun. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1357034X07077777.
[23]
S. Jackson and S. Scott, Gender: a sociological reader. London: Routledge, 2002.
[24]
N. Kabeer, ‘Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1’, Gender & Development, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–24, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/13552070512331332273.
[25]
R. Lewis and S. Mills, Feminist postcolonial theory: a reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003.
[26]
A. Lorde, ‘The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House’, in Sister outsider: essays and speeches, Revised edition., Berkeley: Crossing Press, 2007.
[27]
S. Mahmood, ‘Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 202–236, May 2001, doi: 10.1525/can.2001.16.2.202.
[28]
E. Martin, The woman in the body: a cultural analysis of reproduction, [Rev. ed.]. Boston: Beacon Press, 2001.
[29]
A. McRobbie, The aftermath of feminism: gender, culture and social change. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://web.s.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=a0d9f414-1ed4-4d67-a8c0-f5480921dfaa%40redis&bdata=JkF1dGhUeXBlPWlwLHNoaWImc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d#AN=595715&db=nlebk
[30]
S. Mitter, Common fate, common bond: women in the global economy. London: Pluto, 1986.
[31]
M. Molyneux, ‘Mothers at the Service of the New Poverty Agenda: Progresa/Oportunidades, Mexico’s Conditional Transfer Programme’, Social Policy and Administration, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 425–449, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00497.x.
[32]
A. Oakley, The Ann Oakley reader: gender, women and social science. Bristol: Policy Press, 2005.
[33]
J. Mitchell and A. Oakley, Who’s afraid of feminism?: seeing through the backlash. London: Penguin, 1997.
[34]
O. Oyěwùmí, The invention of women: making an African sense of Western gender discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt0vh
[35]
A. Phipps, The politics of the body: gender in a neoliberal and neoconservative age. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2014.
[36]
R. Ryan-Flood, Lesbian motherhood: Gender, families and sexual citizenship. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057%2F9780230234444
[37]
B. Skeggs, Formations of class and gender: becoming respectable. London: SAGE, 1997.
[38]
G. C. Spivak, Can the subaltern speak. 1988 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=584675&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[39]
R. A. Sydie, Natural women, cultured men: a feminist perspective on sociological theory. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.
[40]
B. Thorne, ‘Re-visioning women and social change: Where are the children?’, Gender & Society, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 85–109, Mar. 1987, doi: 10.1177/089124387001001005.
[41]
A. Varley and M. Blasco, ‘Exiled to the home: Masculinity and ageing in urban Mexico’, The European Journal of Development Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 115–138, Dec. 2000, doi: 10.1080/09578810008426768.
[42]
S. Walby, Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford, UK: B. Blackwell, 1990.
[43]
C. West and D. H. Zimmerman, ‘Doing Gender’, Gender & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 125–151, Jun. 1987, doi: 10.1177/0891243287001002002.
[44]
S. Andermahr, T. Lovell, and C. Wolkowitz, A concise glossary of feminist theory. London: Arnold, 1997.
[45]
M. Barrett and A. Phillips, Destabilizing theory: contemporary feminist debates. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
[46]
N. Charles, Gender in modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[47]
S. Jackson and S. Scott, Gender: a sociological reader. London: Routledge, 2002.
[48]
J. Pilcher and I. Whelehan, Fifty key concepts in gender studies. London: SAGE Publications, 2004.
[49]
V. Robinson and D. Richardson, Eds., Introducing gender and women’s studies, Fourth edition. London: Palgrave, 2015.
[50]
A. S. Wharton, The sociology of gender: an introduction to theory and research. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2005.
[51]
I. Whelehan, Modern feminist thought: from the second wave to ‘post-feminism’. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.
[52]
A. Oakley, ‘Chapter 6: Sex and Gender’, in Sex, gender and society, Rev. ed., Aldershot: Gower, 1985 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=00baeff7-74e2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[53]
A. Oakley, ‘A Brief History of Gender’, in Who’s afraid of feminism?: seeing through the backlash, London: Penguin, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e39b0113-db28-eb11-80cd-005056af4099
[54]
A. Fausto-Sterling, ‘Chapter 1: Dueling Dualisms’, in Sexing the body: gender politics and the construction of sexuality, New York: Basic Books, 2000, pp. 1–29 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4028047c-d228-eb11-80cd-005056af4099
[55]
A. Oakley, Housewife. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.
[56]
‘Moral Maze: Defining Gender’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b09dz416
[57]
J. Williams, ‘Preface’, in Women vs feminism: why we all need liberating from the gender wars, United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ee5de4b4-ebf9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[58]
J. Williams, ‘Chapter 10: Being a woman’, in Women vs feminism: why we all need liberating from the gender wars, United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3d6d0528-ebf9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[59]
J. Williams, ‘Chapter 11: Conclusions’, in Women vs feminism: why we all need liberating from the gender wars, United Kingdom: Emerald Publishing, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=61abc477-ebf9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[60]
F. Engels, E. B. Leacock, and A. West, The origin of the family, private property and the state: in the light of the researches of Lewis H. Morgan. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1972 [Online]. Available: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1884/origin-family/index.htm
[61]
S. Firestone, ‘Chapter 1: The Dialectic of Sex’, in The dialectic of sex: the case for feminist revolution, London: Paladin, 1972 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ee726779-78e2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[62]
S. de Beauvoir and H. M. Parshley, The second sex. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972.
[63]
B. Friedan, The feminine mystique. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965.
[64]
B. Ackerly and J. True, ‘Back to the future: Feminist theory, activism, and doing feminist research in an age of globalization’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 464–472, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2010.06.004.
[65]
J. Butler, ‘Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory’, Theatre Journal, vol. 40, no. 4, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.2307/3207893.
[66]
D. Kulick, ‘The Gender of Brazilian Transgendered Prostitutes’, American Anthropologist, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 574–585, Sep. 1997, doi: 10.1525/aa.1997.99.3.574.
[67]
J. Butler, ‘Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual?’, in Undoing gender, New York: Routledge, 2004, pp. 102–130 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f7318219-6464-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
[68]
J. Butler, Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge, 1993 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781136807183
[69]
M. B. Djupvik, ‘Welcome to the candy shop! Conflicting representations of black masculinity’, Popular Music, vol. 33, no. 02, pp. 209–224, May 2014, doi: 10.1017/S0261143014000312.
[70]
S. A. Shields, ‘Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective’, Sex Roles, vol. 59, no. 5–6, pp. 301–311, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8.
[71]
A. Brah and A. Phoenix, ‘Ain’t I A Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality’, Journal of International Women’s Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://vc.bridgew.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1543&context=jiws
[72]
N. Yuval-Davis, ‘Chapter 1: Theorizing gender and nation’, in Gender & nation, London: Sage, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a6ab58bc-9ee4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[73]
S. Ahmed, ‘Introduction: Stranger fetishism and post-coloniality’, in Strange encounters: embodied others in post-coloniality, London: Routledge, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=50588de3-f4e3-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[74]
H.-J. Bürkner, ‘Intersectionality: How Gender Studies Might Inspire the Analysis of Social Inequality among Migrants’, Population, Space and Place, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 181–195, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1002/psp.664.
[75]
J. Nagel, ‘Masculinity and nationalism: gender and sexuality in the making of nations’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 242–269, Jan. 1998, doi: 10.1080/014198798330007.
[76]
J. Nagel, ‘Ethnicity and Sexuality’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 107–133, Aug. 2000, doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.107.
[77]
S. Pryke, ‘Nationalism and Sexuality, What are the Issues?’, Nations and Nationalism, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 529–546, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00529.x.
[78]
Sylvia Walby, ‘Woman and Nation’, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 81–100, 1992, doi: 10.1163/002071592X00068. [Online]. Available: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/002071592x00068
[79]
N. Yuval-Davis, F. Anthias, and J. Campling, Woman, nation, state. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1989.
[80]
R. Gill, ‘Post-postfeminism?: new feminist visibilities in postfeminist times’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 610–630, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2016.1193293.
[81]
D. Ging, ‘Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere’, Men and Masculinities, May 2017, doi: 10.1177/1097184X17706401.
[82]
S. Berridge and L. Portwood-Stacer, ‘Introduction: Feminism, Hashtags and Violence Against Women and Girls’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 341–341, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2015.1008743.
[83]
E. A. Jane, ‘“Back to the kitchen, cunt”: speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny’, Continuum, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 558–570, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10304312.2014.924479.
[84]
T. Moi, ‘“I Am Not a Feminist, But...”: How Feminism Became the F-Word’, PMLA, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 1735–1741, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1632/pmla.2006.121.5.1735.
[85]
E. Munro, ‘Feminism: A Fourth Wave?’, Political Insight, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 22–25, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1111/2041-9066.12021.
[86]
Zizi Papacharissi, ‘Without You, I’m Nothing: Performances of the Self on Twitter’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 6, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1484/775
[87]
Peay, Pythia, ‘Feminism’s Fourth Wave’, Utne, no. 8, pp. 59–60 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/217420035?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[88]
E. A. Jane, ‘“Back to the kitchen, cunt”: speaking the unspeakable about online misogyny’, Continuum, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 558–570, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10304312.2014.924479.
[89]
R. W. Connell, ‘Chapter 6: Gender Regimes and the Gender Order’, in Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987, pp. 119–142 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0f33a75e-6ee2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[90]
R. Gavison, ‘Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction’, Stanford Law Review, vol. 45, no. 1, Nov. 1992, doi: 10.2307/1228984.
[91]
L. Chappell, The State and Governance. Oxford University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199751457.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199751457-e-24
[92]
C. Pateman, ‘Feminist critiques of the public/private dichotomy’, in The disorder of women: democracy, feminism and political theory, Cambridge: Polity, 1989.
[93]
J. Hearn and L. McKie, ‘Gendered policy and policy on gender: the case of “domestic violence”’, Policy & Politics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 75–91, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1332/030557308783431634.
[94]
S. B. Boyd, ‘Challenging the public/private divide: an overview’, in Challenging the public/private divide: feminism, law, and public policy, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997, pp. 3–34 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442672819
[95]
C. Bacchi, ‘Policies as Gendering Practices: Re-Viewing Categorical Distinctions’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 20–41, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198207.
[96]
N. Craske, ‘Remasculinisation and the neoliberal state in Latin America’, in Gender, politics and the state, London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 100–120.
[97]
J. Hearn, ‘Reflecting on men and social policy: Contemporary critical debates and implications for social policy’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 165–188, May 2010, doi: 10.1177/0261018309358288.
[98]
E. Lombardo, P. Meier, and M. Verloo, ‘Policymaking from a Gender+ Equality Perspective’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–19, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198206.
[99]
S. Okin, ‘Gender, the Public and the Private’, in Feminism and politics, Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998, pp. 116–141 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0f89e4e0-cd41-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
[100]
C. Pateman, ‘The Patriarchal Welfare State’, in Feminism, the public and the private, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 241–276.
[101]
C. Pateman, ‘Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy’, in The disorder of women: democracy, feminism and political theory, Cambridge: Polity, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://readinglists.ucl.ac.uk/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontentstore.cla.co.uk%2F%2Fsecure%2Flink%3Fid%3D86b9c300-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099&sig=3d563dd4ae65719f2e0081c7f9996f0ed099023fad673cb8b22c2e3a0e0f4f72
[102]
P. Uberoi, ‘Feminism and the public–private distinction’, in The public and the private: issues of democratic citizenship, New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2003, pp. 205–228.
[103]
P. L. Hammack, ‘The Life Course Development of Human Sexual Orientation: An Integrative Paradigm’, Human Development, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 267–290, 2005, doi: 10.1159/000086872.
[104]
C. C. Tate, C. P. Youssef, and J. N. Bettergarcia, ‘Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective.’, Review of General Psychology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 302–312, 2014, doi: 10.1037/gpr0000019.
[105]
S. M. van Anders, ‘Beyond Sexual Orientation: Integrating Gender/Sex and Diverse Sexualities via Sexual Configurations Theory’, Archives of Sexual Behavior, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1177–1213, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8.
[106]
‘Inside Transgender Pakistan’. [Online]. Available: https://www.bbc.co.uk/search?q=Transgender+pakistan&sa_f=search-product&scope
[107]
L. M. Diamond, ‘Female bisexuality from adolescence to adulthood: Results from a 10-year longitudinal study.’, Developmental Psychology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 5–14, 2008, doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.1.5.
[108]
‘Feminism and the Politics of Childhood’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press/browse-books/feminism-and-the-politics-of-childhood
[109]
H. Hendrick, ‘Constructions and Reconstructions of British Childhood: An Interpretive Survey, 1800 to the Present’, in Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood, 2nd ed., London: Falmer P., 1997 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745008
[110]
C. Bartholomaeus and A. S. Senkevics, ‘Accounting for Gender in the Sociology of Childhood: Reflections From Research in Australia and Brazil’, SAGE Open, vol. 5, no. 2, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2158244015580303.
[111]
UNFPA/UNICEF, ‘Women’s & Children’s Rights: Making the Connection’. [Online]. Available: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Women-Children_final.pdf
[112]
‘Feminism and the Politics of Childhood’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press/browse-books/feminism-and-the-politics-of-childhood
[113]
E. Dermott, ‘“The ‘Intimate Father’: Defining Paternal Involvement”’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–11, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.5153/sro.859.
[114]
B. Ehrenreich and A. R. Hochschild, Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: Granta Books, 2003.
[115]
C. Faircloth, ‘Chapter 1: Intensive Parenting and the Expansion of Parenting’, in Parenting culture studies, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, pp. 25–50 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=709313b4-70e2-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[116]
A. R. Hochschild and A. Machung, The second shift: working parents and the revolution at home. London: Piatkus, 1990.
[117]
Hakim, Catherine, ‘Symposium: Gender and Economics’, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 5 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/912952813?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
[118]
Mary Leahy and J. Douhney, ‘Women, Work and Preference Formation: A Critique of Catherine Hakim’s Preference Theory’, Journal of Law and Governance, vol. 1, no. 1, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://jbsge.vu.edu.au/index.php/jbsge/article/view/79/130
[119]
G. Becker, ‘Introduction’, in The elusive embryo: how women and men approach new reproductive technologies, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=db688752-f7e3-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[120]
G. Becker, ‘Chapter 14: Performing Gender’, in The elusive embryo: how women and men approach new reproductive technologies, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000, pp. 236–250 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=15e98e17-e762-ea11-80cd-005056af4099
[121]
E. Martin, ‘The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 485–501, Apr. 1991, doi: 10.1086/494680.
[122]
S. Franklin, ‘Chapter 4: It just takes over’, in Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception, London: Routledge, 1997.
[123]
F. van Balen and M. C. Inhorn, Infertility around the globe: new thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780520927810/
[124]
A. Pande, ‘Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: gifts for global sisters?’, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 618–625, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.007.
[125]
‘Feminism and the Politics of Childhood’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press/browse-books/feminism-and-the-politics-of-childhood
