1
David Rieff. The reproach of hunger: food, justice, and money in the twenty-first century. New York: : Simon & Schuster 2015. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Reproach-Hunger-Justice-Twenty-First-Century/dp/1439123888
2
Guthman J, ProQuest (Firm). Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2011.
3
Goody J. Food and love: a cultural history of East and West. London: : Verso 1998. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248654102_Food_and_Love_A_Cultural_History_of_East_and_West
4
Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2006;3. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-33
5
The Centre for Genomic Gastronomy. Food Phreaking (Issue 01): A culinary compendium of curious botanical fruit cultivars. http://www.foodphreaking.com/Issue01pdf/FoodPhreaking_01.pdf
6
The Centre for Genomic Gastronomy. Food Phreaking (Issue 00). http://www.foodphreaking.com/issue0pdf/Food_Phreaking.pdf
7
Marina Chang, Lukas Meusburger, editors. Food Junctions Cookbook. University College London: 2011. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2011/nov/radically-different-food-junctions-cookbook-now-available
8
Rieff D. The reproach of hunger: food, justice, and money in the twenty-first century. New York: : Simon & Schuster 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303831098_The_reproach_of_hunger_food_justice_and_money_in_the_twenty-first_century_by_David_Rieff
9
Guthman J, ProQuest (Firm). Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2011.
10
Austen K. Environmental science: Pollution patrol. Nature 2015;517:136–8. doi:10.1038/517136a
11
Andrea Wiggins, Kevin Crowston. From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE 2011. 1–10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
12
Barton KS. Colorado’s Millennial Generation: Youth Perceptions and Experiences of Nature. Journal of Geography 2012;111:213–23. doi:10.1080/00221341.2011.652648
13
Delgado A, Callen B. Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science 2016;:179–94. doi:10.1177/0963662516647348
14
G.A. Sanchez. We Are Biohackers: Exploring the Collective Identity of the DIYbio Movement | TU Delft Repositories. 2014.http://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:2996be4c-8614-4014-8d3a-6b8ff63c8ee6/?collection=research
15
Keulartz J, van den Belt H. DIY-Bio – economic, epistemological and ethical implications and ambivalences. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2016;12. doi:10.1186/s40504-016-0039-1
16
Sara Ann Wylie, Kirk Jalbert, Shannon Dosemagen, et al. Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research. The Information Society 2014;30:116–26. doi:10.1080/01972243.2014.875783
17
Ottinger G. Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology & Human Values 2010;35:244–70. doi:10.1177/0162243909337121
18
Bäckstrand K. Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics 2003;3:24–41. doi:10.1162/152638003322757916
19
Austen K. Out of the lab and onto the streets. New Scientist 2013;218:48–51. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(13)61628-0
20
Ferretti F. Mapping do-it-yourself science. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2019;15. doi:10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1
21
Alastair Fuad-Luke. Design activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Abingdon, Oxon: : Earthscan 2009. https://designopendata.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/designactivism-beautifulstrangenessforasustainableworld_alastairfuadluke.pdf
22
Sanders EB-N, Stappers PJ. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 2008;4:5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
23
DiSalvo C, Lodato T, Fries L, et al. The collective articulation of issues as design practice. CoDesign 2011;7:185–97. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630475
24
Iversen OS, Halskov K, Leong TW. Rekindling values in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC ’10. ACM Press 2010. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900455
25
Asaro PM. Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 2000;10:257–90. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00004-7
26
Salonen E. Designing Collaboration. 2012.http://www.designingcollaboration.com/Essi_Salonen_DesigningCollaboration.pdf
27
Give up Activism (Do or Die). ;:160–6.http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no9/activism.htm
28
Duncombe S, Lambert S. Activist Art: Does it Work? open! Platform for Art, Culture and the Public Domain. 2013.http://www.onlineopen.org/activist-art-does-it-work
29
Groys B. On Art Activism. e-flux. http://www.e-flux.com/journal/56/60343/on-art-activism/
30
Delwiche JF. You eat with your eyes first. Physiology & Behavior 2012;107:502–4. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.07.007
31
Perullo N. Taste as Experience: The Philosophy and Aesthetics of Food. Columbia University Press 2016. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.7312/peru17348
32
Powell M. Which knowledge? Whose reality? An overview of knowledge used in the development sector. Development in Practice;16.http://www.ascleiden.nl/pdf/elecpublconfpowell.pdf
33
Proposing a fifth generation of knowledge management for development: investigating convergence between knowledge management for development and transdisciplinary research. Knowledge Management for Development Journalhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/267928428_Proposing_a_fifth_generation_of_knowledge_management_for_development_investigating_convergence_between_knowledge_management_for_development_and_transdisciplinary_research
34
Hale J, Knapp C, Bardwell L, et al. Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: Gaining insight through the community gardening experience. Social Science & Medicine 2011;72:1853–63. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.044
35
Rensten J. The edible city: a year of wild food. London: : Boxtree 2016.
36
Poe MR, McLain RJ, Emery M, et al. Urban Forest Justice and the Rights to Wild Foods, Medicines, and Materials in the City. Human Ecology 2013;41:409–22. doi:10.1007/s10745-013-9572-1
37
Goldstone RL, Ashpole BC, Roberts M. Knowledge of Resources and Competitors in Human Foraging. http://cognitrn.psych.indiana.edu/rgoldsto/pdfs/foragerknowledge.pdf
38
Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2006;3. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-3-33
39
Adhitya S, Davis B, Frankjaer R, et al. The BIOdress. In: Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction - TEI ’16. ACM Press 2016. 627–34. doi:10.1145/2839462.2856345
40
Barad K. On Touching--The Inhuman That Therefore I Am. differences 2012;23:206–23. doi:10.1215/10407391-1892943
41
Crossley N. Researching embodiment by way of ‘body techniques’. The Sociological Review 2007;55:80–94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00694.x
42
Davidson J, Milligan C. Embodying emotion sensing space: introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography 2004;5:523–32. doi:10.1080/1464936042000317677
43
Fourcade M. The Problem of Embodiment in the Sociology of Knowledge: Afterword to the Special Issue on Knowledge in Practice. Qualitative Sociology 2010;33:569–74. doi:10.1007/s11133-010-9173-x
44
Tanaka S. Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition. Theory & Psychology 2015;25:455–72. doi:10.1177/0959354315583035
45
Edwards E, Gosden C, Phillips RB. Sensible objects: colonialism, museums, and material culture. English ed. Oxford: : Berg 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474215466
46
Perullo N. Taste as experience: the philosophy and aesthetics of food. American edition. New York: : Columbia University Press 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/peru17348
47
Carless David, Douglas Kitrina. Arts-based research – radical or conventional? | The Psychologist. ;29:354–7.https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-29/may-2016/arts-based-research-radical-or-conventional
