1.
David Rieff: The reproach of hunger: food, justice, and money in the twenty-first century. Simon & Schuster, New York (2015).
2.
Guthman, J., ProQuest (Firm): Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism. University of California Press, Berkeley (2011).
3.
Goody, J.: Food and love: a cultural history of East and West. Verso, London (1998).
4.
Ball, K., Timperio, A.F., Crawford, D.A.: Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 3, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-3-33.
5.
The Centre for Genomic Gastronomy: Food Phreaking (Issue 01): A culinary compendium of curious botanical fruit cultivars.
6.
The Centre for Genomic Gastronomy: Food Phreaking (Issue 00).
7.
Marina Chang, Lukas Meusburger eds: Food Junctions Cookbook. , University College London (2011).
8.
Rieff, D.: The reproach of hunger: food, justice, and money in the twenty-first century. Simon & Schuster, New York (2015).
9.
Guthman, J., ProQuest (Firm): Weighing in: obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism. University of California Press, Berkeley (2011).
10.
Austen, K.: Environmental science: Pollution patrol. Nature. 517, 136–138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/517136a.
11.
Andrea Wiggins, Kevin Crowston: From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science. In: 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 1–10. IEEE (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207.
12.
Barton, K.S.: Colorado’s Millennial Generation: Youth Perceptions and Experiences of Nature. Journal of Geography. 111, 213–223 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2011.652648.
13.
Delgado, A., Callen, B.: Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science. 179–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516647348.
14.
G.A. Sanchez: We Are Biohackers: Exploring the Collective Identity of the DIYbio Movement | TU Delft Repositories, http://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:2996be4c-8614-4014-8d3a-6b8ff63c8ee6/?collection=research, (2014).
15.
Keulartz, J., van den Belt, H.: DIY-Bio – economic, epistemological and ethical implications and ambivalences. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. 12, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-016-0039-1.
16.
Sara Ann Wylie, Kirk Jalbert, Shannon Dosemagen, Matt Ratto: Institutions for Civic Technoscience: How Critical Making is Transforming Environmental Research. The Information Society. 30, 116–126 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.875783.
17.
Ottinger, G.: Buckets of Resistance: Standards and the Effectiveness of Citizen Science. Science, Technology & Human Values. 35, 244–270 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909337121.
18.
Bäckstrand, K.: Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics. 3, 24–41 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322757916.
19.
Austen, K.: Out of the lab and onto the streets. New Scientist. 218, 48–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(13)61628-0.
20.
Ferretti, F.: Mapping do-it-yourself science. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. 15, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1.
21.
Alastair Fuad-Luke: Design activism: beautiful strangeness for a sustainable world. Earthscan, Abingdon, Oxon (2009).
22.
Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign. 4, 5–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068.
23.
DiSalvo, C., Lodato, T., Fries, L., Schechter, B., Barnwell, T.: The collective articulation of issues as design practice. CoDesign. 7, 185–197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630475.
24.
Iversen, O.S., Halskov, K., Leong, T.W.: Rekindling values in participatory design. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference on - PDC ’10. ACM Press (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900455.
25.
Asaro, P.M.: Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies. 10, 257–290 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00004-7.
26.
Salonen, E.: Designing Collaboration, http://www.designingcollaboration.com/Essi_Salonen_DesigningCollaboration.pdf, (2012).
27.
Give up Activism (Do or Die), http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no9/activism.htm.
28.
Duncombe, S., Lambert, S.: Activist Art: Does it Work?, http://www.onlineopen.org/activist-art-does-it-work.
29.
Groys, B.: On Art Activism, http://www.e-flux.com/journal/56/60343/on-art-activism/.
30.
Delwiche, J.F.: You eat with your eyes first. Physiology & Behavior. 107, 502–504 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.07.007.
31.
Perullo, N.: Taste as Experience: The Philosophy and Aesthetics of Food. Columbia University Press (2016).
32.
Powell, M.: Which knowledge? Whose reality? An overview of knowledge used in the development sector. Development in Practice. 16,.
33.
Proposing a fifth generation of knowledge management for development: investigating convergence between knowledge management for development and transdisciplinary research. Knowledge Management for Development Journal.
34.
Hale, J., Knapp, C., Bardwell, L., Buchenau, M., Marshall, J., Sancar, F., Litt, J.S.: Connecting food environments and health through the relational nature of aesthetics: Gaining insight through the community gardening experience. Social Science & Medicine. 72, 1853–1863 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.044.
35.
Rensten, J.: The edible city: a year of wild food. Boxtree, London (2016).
36.
Poe, M.R., McLain, R.J., Emery, M., Hurley, P.T.: Urban Forest Justice and the Rights to Wild Foods, Medicines, and Materials in the City. Human Ecology. 41, 409–422 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-013-9572-1.
37.
Goldstone, R.L., Ashpole, B.C., Roberts, M.: Knowledge of Resources and Competitors in Human Foraging, http://cognitrn.psych.indiana.edu/rgoldsto/pdfs/foragerknowledge.pdf.
38.
Ball, K., Timperio, A.F., Crawford, D.A.: Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 3, (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-3-33.
39.
Adhitya, S., Davis, B., Frankjaer, R., Flanagan, P., Mahony, Z.: The BIOdress. In: Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction - TEI ’16. pp. 627–634. ACM Press (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2856345.
40.
Barad, K.: On Touching--The Inhuman That Therefore I Am. differences. 23, 206–223 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892943.
41.
Crossley, N.: Researching embodiment by way of ‘body techniques’. The Sociological Review. 55, 80–94 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00694.x.
42.
Davidson, J., Milligan, C.: Embodying emotion sensing space: introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography. 5, 523–532 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936042000317677.
43.
Fourcade, M.: The Problem of Embodiment in the Sociology of Knowledge: Afterword to the Special Issue on Knowledge in Practice. Qualitative Sociology. 33, 569–574 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9173-x.
44.
Tanaka, S.: Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition. Theory & Psychology. 25, 455–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315583035.
45.
Edwards, E., Gosden, C., Phillips, R.B.: Sensible objects: colonialism, museums, and material culture. Berg, Oxford (2006).
46.
Perullo, N.: Taste as experience: the philosophy and aesthetics of food. Columbia University Press, New York (2016).
47.
Carless David, Douglas Kitrina: Arts-based research – radical or conventional? | The Psychologist. 29, 354–357.