1.
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Manual of Archive Administration.; 1922. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
2.
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. F.W. Cheshire; 1956. http://www2.archivists.org/publications/epubs
4.
Upward F. Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal. 2000;10(3):115-139. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007259
5.
Sue McKemmish. Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. In: Archives: Recordkeeping in Society. Vol Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University; 2005:1-20.
6.
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist. 2007;70(2):315-343. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
7.
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist. 2008;71(1):118-143. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2
8.
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
9.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record. The Concept of Record: Report from the Second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. Vol Skrifter utgivna av Riksarkivet. Riksarkivet; 1998.
10.
Wooldridge JM. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 5th ed. South-Western Cengage Learning; 2013.
11.
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth. The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science. 2006;6(1):13-68. doi:10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
12.
Atherton, Jay. From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria. 1985;(21).
13.
Kahle B. Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist. 2007;70(1):23-31. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845
14.
Craven, Louise. What Are Archives?: Cultural and Theoretical Perspectives : A Reader. Ashgate; 2008. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315547497
15.
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, Associazione nazionale archivistica italiana. International Reseach on Permanent Authentic Records in Electronic Systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, Interactive and Dynamic Records. CLEUP; 2008.
16.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of Archival Thinking Vol 1. Libraries Unlimited; 2010.
17.
Heather M. Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record. Published online 2000.
18.
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia. The Records Continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives First Fifty Years. Vol Monash occasional papers in librarianship, recordkeeping and bibliography. Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives; 1994.
19.
Sue M. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology).
20.
Jennifer M. Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence.
21.
Menne-Haritz, Angelika. Business Processes: An Archival Science Approach to Collaborative Decision Making, Records, and Knowledge Management. Vol Archivist’s library. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004.
22.
Pearce-Moses R. Janus in Cyberspace: Archives on the Threshold of the Digital Era. The American Archivist. 2007;70(1):13-22. doi:10.17723/aarc.70.1.n7121165223j6t83
23.
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):1-19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
24.
Trace CB. What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):137-159. doi:10.1007/BF02435634
25.
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties.
26.
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
27.
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
28.
Yeo G. Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal. 2011;21(1):8-27. doi:10.1108/09565691111125071
29.
Ketelaar E. Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science. 2012;12(1):19-33. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5
30.
Duchein M. The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist. 1992;55(1):14-25. doi:10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888
31.
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27(4):312-321. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006
32.
Lee, Christopher A. I, Digital: Personal Collections in the Digital Era. Society of American Archivists; 2011.
33.
McKemmish S. Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
34.
Gilliland A, Flinn A. Community Archives: What are we really talking about? In: Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives Meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University. http://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/920626/gilliland_flinn_keynote.pdf
35.
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 2010;10(4):353-372. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
36.
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society. Vol Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University; 2005.
37.
McKemmish S, Piggott M. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria. 2013;76. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13461/14781
38.
WORTHY B. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance. 2010;23(4):561-582. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
39.
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of Information: The Law, the Practice and the Ideal. Vol The law in context series. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
40.
Birkinshaw P. Government and Information: The Law Relating to Access, Disclosure and Their Regulation. 3rd ed. Tottel; 2005.
41.
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
42.
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28(2):151-176. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
43.
Flinn A. Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader. Facet; 2011:145-169. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f8a3983f-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
44.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society. Quorum Books; 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
45.
Flinn, Andrew, Jones, Harriet. Introduction. In: Freedom of Information: Open Access, Empty Archives?. Routledge; 2009:1-6. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ab7e6e60-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
46.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of Archival Thinking Vol 1. Libraries Unlimited; 2010.
47.
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
48.
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
49.
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2009;30(2):227-248. doi:10.1080/00379810903445000
50.
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28(2):125-138. doi:10.1080/00379810701607736
51.
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl. Better off Forgetting?: Essays on Archives, Public Policy, and Collective Memory. University of Toronto Press; 2010. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/9781442689879
52.
McLeod J. Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal. 2012;22(2):92-97. doi:10.1108/09565691211268711
53.
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal. 2011;21(2):122-134. doi:10.1108/09565691111152053
54.
Bailey S, Vidyarthi J. Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Records Management Journal. 2010;20(3):279-290. doi:10.1108/09565691011095300
55.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
56.
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):83-109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
57.
Leighton John J. Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. Published online 2010.
58.
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
59.
Roy L, Trace C, Gilbert S. Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. Published 2013. http://library.ifla.org/108/
60.
Riley T. Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs. Published online 2009. http://dspace.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/1880/47975/1/Prospects%2520-%2520final.pdf
61.
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science. 2011;11(3-4):211-239. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
62.
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 2011;74(1):185-210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
63.
Thorpe K. Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. Published 2013. http://library.ifla.org/99/
64.
Krebs AB. Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science. 2012;12(2):173-190. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2
65.
Hawkins DT. Personal Archiving: Preserving Our Digital Heritage. Information Today, Inc; 2013.
66.
Cook, Terry. What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria. 1997;(43):17-63.
67.
Mortensen P. The Place of Theory in Archival Practice.
68.
Millar L. The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
69.
Duranti L. From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
70.
Groth P, Gil Y, Cheney J, Miles S. Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2012;7(1). doi:10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213
71.
MacNeil H. Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
72.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1.
73.
Ketelaar E. Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
74.
Cook, Terry. The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria. 1993;35.
75.
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., Vereniging van Archivarissen in Nederland. Manual for the Arrangement and Description of Archives. Vol Archival classics series. Society of American Archivists; 2003.
76.
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden. The Principle of Provenance: Report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. Vol Skrifter utgivna av Svenska riksarkivet. Swedish National Archives; 1994.
77.
Brothman B. Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice.
78.
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense of Professional Rebirth:Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives.
79.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2.
80.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3.
81.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4.
82.
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5.
83.
Duranti, Luciana. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science. Scarecrow Press; 1998.
84.
Duranti L. Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
85.
Duranti L, MacNeil H. The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
86.
Eastwood T. Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies.
87.
Eastwood T. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
88.
Horsman P. The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
89.
MacNeil H. Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
90.
Nesmith T. Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory.
91.
Ridener, John. From Polders to Postmodernism: A Concise History of Archival Theory. Litwin Books; 2009.
92.
Roberts J. Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
93.
Roberts J. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
94.
Duranti L. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):78-95. doi:10.1108/09565691011039852
95.
Cumming K. Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):41-52. doi:10.1108/09565691011036224
96.
Mak B. On the Uses of Authenticity. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13381/14688
97.
Geoffrey Yeo. The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13384/14691
98.
Yeo G. Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13407/14713
99.
Zhang J. Original Order in Digital Archives. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13410/14719
100.
O’Meara E, Tuomala M. Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13385/14693
101.
Fear K, Donaldson DR. Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science. 2012;12(3):319-339. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7
102.
Bazerman C. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science. 2012;12(4):377-388. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
103.
Bunn J. Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science. Published online 12 March 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2
104.
Stan Godlovitch. Preserving, Restoring, Repairing. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 1989;23(3):39-47. doi:10.2307/3332759
105.
Cumming K, Picot A. Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42(2):133-145. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.926824
106.
Cook T. ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2011;32(2):173-189. doi:10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
107.
Schellenberg TR. The Appraisal of Modern Records.
108.
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf. https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we-do/museums-libraries-and-galleries/significance-20
109.
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
110.
Cook T. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science. 2006;5(2-4):101-161. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2
111.
Booms H. Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources.
112.
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science. 2013;13(2-3):207-216. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
113.
Abraham T. Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist. 1991;54(1):44-52. doi:10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
114.
Boles F, Young J. Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist. 1985;48(2):121-140. doi:10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw
115.
Williams C. Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
116.
Cox R. The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
117.
Bailey C. Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13432/14742
118.
Cynthia K. Sauer. Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist. 2001;64(2):308-349. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/40294175?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Doing&searchText=the&searchText=best&searchText=we&searchText=can?&searchText=The&searchText=use&searchText=of&searchText=collection&searchText=development&searchText=policies&searchText=and&searchText=cooperative&searchText=collecting&searchText=activities&searchText=at&searchText=manuscript&searchText=repositories&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DDoing%2Bthe%2Bbest%2Bwe%2Bcan%253F%2BThe%2Buse%2Bof%2Bcollection%2Bdevelopment%2Bpolicies%2Band%2Bcooperative%2Bcollecting%2Bactivities%2Bat%2Bmanuscript%2Brepositories%26amp%3Bfilter%3Djid%253A10.2307%252Fj50000557%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D
119.
Wisniewski Timothy. Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image. 2008;7(2):1-24. doi:10.1353/mov.2008.0002
120.
Mancuso L. Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts. 2013;41(2):146-159. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.801101
121.
Harvey R, Thompson D. Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech. 2010;28(2):313-322. doi:10.1108/07378831011047703
122.
The Almost Accidental Archive and its Impact on Literary Subjects and Canonicity. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes. 2007;40(2):96-108. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_canadian_studies/v040/40.2tector.html
123.
Cook M. Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):72-77. doi:10.1108/09565691011039843
124.
Kim Y, Ross S. Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;50(1):1-10. doi:10.1002/meet.14505001042
125.
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends. 2009;57(3):490-515. doi:10.1353/lib.0.0049
126.
Eastwood T. Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
127.
Pollard R. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review.
128.
Carvalho C. Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal. 2001;11(3):175-205. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007274
129.
Jones S, Abbott D, Ross S. Redefining the performing arts archive. Archival Science. 2009;9(3-4):165-171. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9086-1
130.
FORTIER N. Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science. 2005;5(2-4):343-360. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z
131.
Kärberg T. Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science. Published online 13 September 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z
132.
Conway P. Digital transformations and the archival nature of surrogates. Archival Science. Published online 20 April 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9219-z
133.
Sims F. A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal. 2002;12(1):8-13. doi:10.1108/09565690210427743
134.
Cox, Richard J. No Innocent Deposits: Forming Archives by Rethinking Appraisal. Scarecrow Press; 2004.
135.
Boles, Frank. Selecting & Appraising Archives & Manuscripts. Vol Archival fundamentals series. Society of American Archivists; 2005.
136.
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa. Controlling the Past: Documenting Society and Institutions : Essays in Honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Society of American Archivists; 2011.
137.
Arias PB. Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal. 2008;18(3):205-220. doi:10.1108/09565690810916456
138.
Samuels H. Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria. 1991;33.
139.
Jonker AEM. No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2009;30(1):67-80. doi:10.1080/00379810903264625
140.
SCOTT M. Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal. 1997;7(2):101-114. doi:10.1108/eb027107
141.
Tschan R. A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist. 2002;65(2):176-195. doi:10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
142.
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science. 2013;13(2-3):207-216. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
143.
Cox R, Samuels H. The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist. 1988;51(1-2):28-42. doi:10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8
144.
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections.
145.
Alexander P, Samuels H. The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist. 1987;50(4):518-531. doi:10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u
146.
Honer E, Graham S. Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
147.
Kretzschmar R. Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science. 2006;5(2-4):219-238. doi:10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y
148.
Craig, Barbara Lazenby. Archival Appraisal: Theory and Practice. K.G. Saur; 2004.
149.
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation. https://www.icon.org.uk/resources/resources-for-conservation-professionals/standards-and-ethics/icon-professional-standards.html
150.
Jenkinson H. A Manual of Archive Administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries; 1965.
151.
Duranti L. Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria. 1992;35. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/92f1/d3b23cfc46f8c4ed7638ca58fac9c05c4574.pdf
152.
Duff WM, Harris V. Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science. 2002;2(3-4):263-285. doi:10.1007/BF02435625
153.
Huvila I. Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science. 2008;8(1):15-36. doi:10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
154.
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012.; 2012. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
155.
Menne-Haritz A. Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science. 2001;1(1):57-82. doi:10.1007/BF02435639
156.
Yakel E. Archival representation. Archival Science. 2003;3(1):1-25. doi:10.1007/BF02438926
157.
Clough P, Tang J, Hall MM, Warner A. Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings. 2011;63(2/3):127-147. doi:10.1108/00012531111135628
158.
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern Archives: Principles and Techniques. F.W. Cheshire; 1956.
159.
Bunn J. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records. Published online 2 October 2013:1-13. doi:10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
160.
Ruddock B. Linked Data and the LOCAH project. Business Information Review. 2011;28(2):105-111. doi:10.1177/0266382111404013
161.
The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model.
162.
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, Gilliland A, Punzalan R. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):397-419. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
163.
Eito-Brun R. Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science. Published online 2 February 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3
164.
Council of Europe. Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. Published online 2003.
165.
Niu J. Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science. Published online 13 June 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4
166.
Gracy KF. Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science. Published online 27 February 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2
167.
Valge J, Kibal B. Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28(2):193-214. doi:10.1080/00379810701611951
168.
Blais G. Access to Archival Records: A Review of Current Issues: A RAMP Study. Published online 1995.
169.
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
170.
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog. doi:[object Object]
171.
The National Archives. The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
172.
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205).
173.
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
174.
Barbara Reed. Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping.
175.
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 2011;74(1):185-210. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
176.
Flanagan M, Carini P. How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist. 2012;75(2):514-537. doi:10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4
177.
Duff W, Johnson C. Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist. 2003;66(1):79-95. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
178.
Prom C. Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist. 2011;74(1):158-184. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v
179.
Fear K. User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist. 2010;73(1):26-60. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551
180.
Daniels M, Yakel E. Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist. 2010;73(2):535-568. doi:10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357
181.
Altman B, Nemmers J. The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist. 2001;64(1):121-131. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74
182.
Yakel E, Bost LL. Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivist. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40293870
183.
Yakel E, Torres D. AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist. 2003;66(1):51-78. doi:10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
184.
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
185.
Daines JG, Nimer CL. Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization. 2011;9(1):4-31. doi:10.1080/15332748.2011.574019
186.
Sexton A, Turner C, Yeo G, Hockey S. Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25(1):33-49. doi:10.1080/0037981042000199133
187.
Chapman A. Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25(2):149-155. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271475
188.
Hill A. Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25(2):139-148. doi:10.1080/0037981042000271466
189.
Guide to archival software.
190.
Ismail A, Jamaludin A. Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal. 2011;21(1):69-75. doi:10.1108/09565691111125116
191.
Procter M. What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2010;31(1):15-27. doi:10.1080/00379811003658476
192.
Broady-Preston J. The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management. 2010;31(1/2):66-78. doi:10.1108/01435121011013412
193.
Neazor M. Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. Published online 2007. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13146/14390
194.
Dingwall G. Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist. 2004;67(1):11-30. doi:10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4
195.
Cline S. ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist. 2009;72(2):331-343. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14
196.
Gale C. Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2006;27(1):17-27. doi:10.1080/00039810600691221
197.
Shepherd, Elizabeth. Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. In: Archives and Archivists in 20th Century England. Ashgate; 2009. doi:https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780754681922/startPage/186
198.
Jenkinson, Hilary. The English Archivist: A New Profession. H.K. Lewis; 1948.
199.
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. Published online 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
200.
Elizabeth G, Rebecca S. ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258200542_Golden_Age_Quiescence_and_Revival
201.
Currall J, Moss M. We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal. 2008;18(1):69-91. doi:10.1108/09565690810858532
202.
McLeod J, Hare C. Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(1):9-40. doi:10.1108/09565691011036215
203.
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists. Ethics and the Archival Profession: Introduction and Case Studies. Society of American Archivists; 2003.
204.
Cook M. Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2006;27(1):1-15. doi:10.1080/00039810600691205
205.
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, Accountability and Recordkeeping in a Dangerous World. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2006.
206.
Danielson, Elena S. The Ethical Archivist. Society of American Archivists; 2010.
207.
MacNeil, Heather. Without Consent: The Ethics of Disclosing Personal Information in Public Archives. Scarecrow Press; 1992.
208.
Procter, Margaret, Lewis, C. P., Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies. New Directions in Archival Research. Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies; 2000.
209.
Shepherd E. Archives and Archivists in 20th Century England. Ashgate; 2009. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780754681922
210.
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria. 2001;51. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12792/13989
211.
Harris V. Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria. 1997;44. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12200/13217
212.
Greene M. A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist. 2013;76(2):302-334. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.14744l214663kw43
213.
Jimerson R. Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist. 2013;76(2):335-345. doi:10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
214.
Caswell M. Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist. 2013;76(2). http://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.76.2.89324135v02r2q74
215.
Bastian J. Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria. 2002;(53).
216.
MacNeil H. Trust and professional identity: narratives, counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities. Archival Science. 2011;11(3-4):175-192. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9150-5
217.
Duranti L. Archives as place. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research. http://archivo.cartagena.es/files/36-165-DOC_FICHERO1/07-duranti_archives.pdf
218.
Gilliland A. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science. 2011;11(3-4):193-209. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0
219.
Duff WM, Flinn A, Suurtamm KE, Wallace DA. Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science. 2013;13(4). doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
220.
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists. Archives Power: Memory, Accountability, and Social Justice. Society of American Archivists; 2009.
221.
Flinn A. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies. 2011;7(2).
222.
Bastian J. A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist. 2001;64(1):96-114. doi:10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377
223.
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 2013;41(1):7-22. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
224.
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology).
225.
Brothman B. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria. 1999;48. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12717/13894
226.
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 2013;41(1):7-22. doi:10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
227.
Tom Nesmith. Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist. 2002;65. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/pdf/10.17723/aarc.65.1.rr48450509r0712u
228.
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria. 2001;51. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12793/13991
229.
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):1-19. doi:10.1007/BF02435628
230.
Cook T. Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies. Published online 2007.
231.
Ham G. Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist. 1981;44-3.
232.
Kallberg M. Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age. Records Management Journal. 2012;22(2):98-115. doi:10.1108/09565691211268162
233.
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms - Online First - Springer. Archival Science.
234.
Joseph P, Debowski S, Goldschmidt P. Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal. 2012;22(1):57-75. doi:10.1108/09565691211222108
235.
Flinn A, Shepherd E. Questions of trust (and distrust). Archival Science. 2011;11(3-4):169-174. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9169-7
236.
Cook T, Schwartz JM. Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2002;2(3-4):171-185. doi:10.1007/BF02435620
237.
Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 2001;1(1):3-24. doi:10.1007/BF02435636
238.
Harris V. The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science. 2002;2(1-2):63-86. doi:10.1007/BF02435631
239.
Ketelaar E. Archives as Spaces of Memory. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):9-27. doi:10.1080/00379810802499678
240.
Cline S. "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist. Published online 2012. https://americanarchivist.org/doi/abs/10.17723/aarc.75.2.03193j1517858r34
241.
Sachs A. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria. 2006;62. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12887/14118
242.
Hamilton, Carolyn. Refiguring the Archive. Kluwer Academic; 2002. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0570-8
243.
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Vol Religion and postmodernism. University of Chicago Press; 1996.
244.
Sachs HR. Reconstructing a Life: The Archival Challenges of Women’s History. Library Trends. 2008;56(3):650-666. doi:10.1353/lib.2008.0018
245.
Dirks J. Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria. 2004;57. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/viewFile/12451/13554
246.
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science. 2013;13(2-3):95-120. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
247.
Jacobsen T, Punzalan RL, Hedstrom ML. Invoking "collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science. Archival Science. 2013;13(2-3):217-251. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4
248.
Greene M. The Power of Meaning: The Archival Mission in the Postmodern Age -. American Archivist. 2002;65. http://archivists.metapress.com/content/l914668v881wv19n/?p=ae0ce19dfb2c403fbcddf677c12148e4&pi=3
249.
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World.
250.
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):215-229. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
251.
Birkinshaw P. Government and Information: The Law Relating to Access, Disclosure and Their Regulation. 3rd ed. Tottel; 2005.
252.
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of Information: The Law, the Practice and the Ideal. Vol The law in context series. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2010. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844904
253.
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of Archival Thinking Vol 1. Libraries Unlimited; 2010.
254.
Meijer A. Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
255.
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. Published online 3 September 2014. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
256.
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
257.
Tough A. Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal. 2011;21(3):225-236. doi:10.1108/09565691111186894
258.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society. Quorum Books; 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
259.
Halilovich H. Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):231-247. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z
260.
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):215-229. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
261.
Adami TA, Hunt M. Genocidal Archives: The African Context—Genocide in Rwanda. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2005;26(1):105-121. doi:10.1080/00039810500047557
262.
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):249-274. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
263.
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
264.
Robinson G. Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):323-343. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9228-y
265.
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the Public Good: Accountability and Records in Modern Society. Quorum Books; 2002. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=74622&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
266.
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, Accountability and Recordkeeping in a Dangerous World. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2006.
267.
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: Recordkeeping in Society. Vol Topics in Australasian library and information studies. Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University; 2005.
268.
Procter, Margaret, Cook, Michael, Williams, Caroline. Political Pressure and the Archival Record. Society of American Archivists; 2005.
269.
Lemieux VL. The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal. 2010;20(2):199-216. doi:10.1108/09565691011064331
270.
Wamukoya J. Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal. 2000;10(1):23-33. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007254
271.
Dominy G. ‘We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it’ Archiving and Accessing the Records of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Published online 2005.
272.
Hurley C. Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 2002;30(2).
273.
Hurley C. Archivists and Accountability. 2006;34(2).
274.
Jimerson RC. Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 2011;39(1).
275.
Caswell M, Mallick S. Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42(1):73-86. doi:10.1080/01576895.2014.880931
276.
Ray J. Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2009;24(4):357-368. doi:10.1080/09647770903314720
277.
Cunningham A. Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist. 2008;71(2):530-543. doi:10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
278.
Daniel D. Archival representations of immigration and ethnicity in North American history: from the ethnicization of archives to the archivization of ethnicity. Archival Science. Published online 1 August 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9209-6
279.
Wakimoto DK, Bruce C, Partridge H. Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science. 2013;13(4):293-316. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
280.
Theimer K. What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist. 2011;74(1):58-68. doi:10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666
281.
Caswell M. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science. 2014;14(3-4):307-322. doi:10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
282.
Archival Science, Volume 8, Issue 4 - Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives and Museums in the Information Age. http://link.springer.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/journal/10502/8/4/page/1
283.
Marty PF. An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly. 2010;80(1):1-5. doi:10.1086/648549
284.
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
285.
Hill, Jennie. The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader. Facet; 2011.
286.
Lappin J. What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal. 2010;20(3):252-264. doi:10.1108/09565691011095283
287.
Cumming K, Findlay C. Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal. 2010;20(3):265-278. doi:10.1108/09565691011095292
288.
Higgins S. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2011;6(2). doi:10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
289.
Lau AJ, Gilliland AJ, Anderson K. NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15(7):991-1015. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404
290.
Abrams S, Cruse P, Kunze J. Preservation Is Not a Place. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2009;4(1). doi:10.2218/ijdc.v4i1.72
291.
Cole J, Nolan J, Seko Y, Mancuso K, Ospina A. GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society. 2011;13(7):1161-1179. doi:10.1177/1461444811398032
292.
Robinson H. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2012;27(4):413-429. doi:10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
293.
Lee C, Tibbo H. Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
294.
Elke Zobl. Cultural Production, Transnational Networking, and Critical Reflection in Feminist Zines. Signs. 2009;35(1):1-12. doi:10.1086/599256
295.
Crymble A. An Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Use by the Archival Community. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13298/14609
296.
EICHHORN K. D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies. 2010;39(6):622-646. doi:10.1080/00497878.2010.490716
297.
Baker S, Huber A. Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2013;16(5):513-530. doi:10.1177/1367549413491721
298.
Timms K. New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
299.
Marsden C. Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2001;22(1):17-23. doi:10.1080/00379810120037469
300.
Ceeney N. The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):57-71. doi:10.1080/00379810802499868
301.
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. Archivaria. 2007;63.
302.
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 2010;10(4):353-372. doi:10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
303.
Newman J. Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2012;33(1):57-73. doi:10.1080/00379816.2012.666404
304.
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
305.
Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2010;16(1-2):59-76. doi:10.1080/13527250903441770
306.
Moore S, Pell S. Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2010;16(4-5):255-268. doi:10.1080/13527251003775513
307.
Flinn, Andrew. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. Interactions: UCLA journal of education and information studies. 2011;7(2). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt2490x
308.
Flinn, A. The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. In: The Future of Archives and Recordkeeping: A Reader. Facet; 2011. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14509809360004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
309.
Flinn, A. Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2010;16(1):39-51. doi:10.1177/1354856509347707
310.
Flinn A, Stevens M, Shepherd E. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science. 2009;9(1-2):71-86. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
311.
Flinn, A., Stevens, M. "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. In: Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2009. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049047
312.
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28(2):151-176. doi:10.1080/00379810701611936
313.
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community Archives: The Shaping of Memory. Vol Principles and practice in records management and archives. Facet; 2009. doi:10.29085/9781856049047
314.
Gray V. ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):1-8. doi:10.1080/00379810802499652
315.
Flinn, A., Pick, G. Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. In: Embedding Shared Heritage: The Heritage Diversity Task Force Report. Greater London Authority; 2009. http://www.mla.gov.uk/what/programmes/renaissance/regions/london/News_and_Resources/~/media/London/Files/2009/Publications/Embedding%20Shared%20Heritage_LOW%20resolution.ashx
316.
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29(1):83-109. doi:10.1080/00379810802515069
317.
Anderson S, Allen R. Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist. 2009;72(2):383-400. doi:10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
318.
Yaco S, Hardy BB. Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science. 2013;13(2-3):253-272. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0
319.
Kalfatovic MR, Kapsalis E, Spiess KP, Camp A, Edson M. Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science. 2008;8(4):267-277. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
320.
Sinn D, Syn SY. Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science. Published online 14 July 2013. doi:10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7
321.
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives. Published online 2012. http://ica2012.ica.org/files/pdf/Full%20papers%20upload/ica12Final00128.pdf
322.
Ramírez M. The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3. Published online 2009. http://escholarship.org/uc/gseis_interactions?volume=5;issue=1
323.
Green LJF. Cultural heritage, archives & citizenship: 1. Critical Arts. 2007;21(2):308-320. doi:10.1080/02560040701810073
324.
Ormond-Parker L, Sloggett R. Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science. 2012;12(2):191-212. doi:10.1007/s10502-011-9154-1
