1
Jenkinson, Hilary, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Manual of archive administration. 1922.
2
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: F.W. Cheshire 1956.
4
Upward F. Modelling the continuum as paradigm shift in recordkeeping and archiving processes, and beyond: a personal reflection. Records Management Journal. 2000;10:115–39. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007259
5
Sue McKemmish. Traces: Document, record, archive, archives. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005:1–20.
6
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (1): Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations. The American Archivist. 2007;70:315–43. doi: 10.17723/aarc.70.2.u327764v1036756q
7
Yeo G. Concepts of Record (2): Prototypes and Boundary Objects. The American Archivist. 2008;71:118–43. doi: 10.17723/aarc.71.1.p0675v40tr14q6w2
8
InterPARES 3 Intellectual Framework.
9
Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record. The concept of record: report from the second Stockholm Conference on Archival Science and the Concept of Record, 30-31 May 1996. [Stockholm]: Riksarkivet 1998.
10
Wooldridge JM. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. 5th ed. Mason, Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning 2013.
11
Duranti, Luciana, Thibodeau, Kenneth. The Concept of Record in Interactive, Experiential and Dynamic Environments: the View of InterPARES*. Archival Science. 2006;6:13–68. doi: 10.1007/s10502-006-9021-7
12
Atherton, Jay. From Life Cycle to Continuum: Some Thoughts on the Records Management - Archives Relationship. Archiviria. 1985.
13
Kahle B. Universal Access to All Knowledge. The American Archivist. 2007;70:23–31. doi: 10.17723/aarc.70.1.u114006770252845
14
Craven, Louise. What are archives?: cultural and theoretical perspectives : a reader. Aldershot: Ashgate 2008.
15
Duranti, Luciana, Preston, Randy, InterPARES Project, et al. International reseach on permanent authentic records in electronic systems (InterPARES) 2: Experimental, interactive and dynamic records. Padova: CLEUP 2008.
16
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: Libraries Unlimited 2010.
17
Heather M. Conceptualizing an Authentic Electronic Record. 2000.
18
McKemmish, Sue, Piggott, Michael, Australia. The Records continuum: Ian Maclean and Australian Archives first fifty years. Clayton: Ancora Press in association with Australian Archives 1994.
19
Sue M. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: A Continuum of Responsibility (Information Technology). 1997.
20
Jennifer M. Towards an Archival Concept of Evidence.
21
Menne-Haritz, Angelika. Business processes: an archival science approach to collaborative decision making, records, and knowledge management. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004.
22
Pearce-Moses R. Janus in Cyberspace: Archives on the Threshold of the Digital Era. The American Archivist. 2007;70:13–22. doi: 10.17723/aarc.70.1.n7121165223j6t83
23
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2002;2:1–19. doi: 10.1007/BF02435628
24
Trace CB. What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture. Archival Science. 2002;2:137–59. doi: 10.1007/BF02435634
25
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties. 1996.
26
Upward, Frank. Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping.
27
InterPARES 1 Template for Analysis.
28
Yeo G. Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal. 2011;21:8–27. doi: 10.1108/09565691111125071
29
Ketelaar E. Cultivating archives: meanings and identities. Archival Science. 2012;12:19–33. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9142-5
30
Duchein M. The History of European Archives and the Development of the Archival Profession in Europe. The American Archivist. 1992;55:14–25. doi: 10.17723/aarc.55.1.k17n44g856577888
31
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information and its impact in the United Kingdom. Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27:312–21. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.006
32
Lee, Christopher A. I, digital: personal collections in the digital era. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2011.
33
McKemmish S. Evidence of me . . . (first published in Archives and Manucscripts, 24 (1) 1996.).
34
Gilliland A, Flinn A. Community Archives: What are we really talking about? Nexus, Confluence, and Difference: Community Archives meets Community Informatics: Prato CIRN Conference Oct 28-30 2013,. Centre for Community Networking Research, Centre for Social Informatics, Monash University .
35
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 2010;10:353–72. doi: 10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
36
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005.
37
McKemmish S, Piggott M. Toward the Archival Multiverse: Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria. 2013;76.
38
WORTHY B. More Open but Not More Trusted? The Effect of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on the United Kingdom Central Government. Governance. 2010;23:561–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x
39
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
40
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: Tottel 2005.
41
Legislation and regulations | The National Archives. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/
42
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges1. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28:151–76. doi: 10.1080/00379810701611936
43
Flinn A. Chapter 8: The impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: Facet 2011:145–69.
44
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: Quorum Books 2002.
45
Flinn, Andrew, Jones, Harriet. Introduction. Freedom of information: open access, empty archives?. London: Routledge 2009:1–6.
46
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: Libraries Unlimited 2010.
47
Protocols for Native American Archival Materials.
48
ATSILIRN - Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resource Network.
49
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. The Impact of Freedom of Information on Records Management and Record Use in Local Government: A Literature Review. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2009;30:227–48. doi: 10.1080/00379810903445000
50
Shepherd E. Freedom of Information and Records Management in the UK: What has been the Impact? Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28:125–38. doi: 10.1080/00379810701607736
51
Holmlund, Mona, Avery, Cheryl. Better off forgetting?: essays on archives, public policy, and collective memory. London: University of Toronto Press 2010.
52
McLeod J. Thoughts on the opportunities for records professionals of the open access, open data agenda. Records Management Journal. 2012;22:92–7. doi: 10.1108/09565691211268711
53
Shepherd E, Stevenson A, Flinn A. Records management in English local government: the effect of freedom of information. Records Management Journal. 2011;21:122–34. doi: 10.1108/09565691111152053
54
Bailey S, Vidyarthi J. Human-computer interaction: the missing piece of the records management puzzle? Records Management Journal. 2010;20:279–90. doi: 10.1108/09565691011095300
55
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: Facet 2009.
56
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29:83–109. doi: 10.1080/00379810802515069
57
Leighton John J. Digital lives - an initial synthesis Version 0.1. 2010.
58
paradigm | workbook on digital private papers.
59
Roy L, Trace C, Gilbert S. Indigenous ways: assessing the awareness of and potential need for identifying content on indigenous world view in educating Libraries/Archives/Museum (LAM) entry level professionals. 2013. http://library.ifla.org/108/
60
Riley T. Prospects in First Nations Archives: Reflections based on my participation in the Tribal Archives, Libraries and Museums Institutes and Conference programs. 2009.
61
McKemmish S, Faulkhead S, Russell L. Distrust in the archive: reconciling records. Archival Science. 2011;11:211–39. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2
62
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 2011;74:185–210. doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
63
Thorpe K. Protocols for libraries and archives in Australia: incorporating Indigenous perspectives in the information field. 2013. http://library.ifla.org/99/
64
Krebs AB. Native America’s twenty-first-century right to know. Archival Science. 2012;12:173–90. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9161-2
65
Hawkins DT. Personal archiving: preserving our digital heritage. Medford, N.J.: Information Today, Inc 2013.
66
Cook, Terry. What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archiviaria. 1997;17–63.
67
Mortensen P. The Place of Theory in Archival Practice. 1999.
68
Millar L. The Death of the Fonds and the Resurrection of Provenance: Archival Context in Space and Time.
69
Duranti L. From Digital Diplomatics to Digital Records Forensics. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13229/14548
70
Groth P, Gil Y, Cheney J, et al. Requirements for Provenance on the Web. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2012;7. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.213
71
MacNeil H. Providing Grounds for Trust II: The Findings of the Authenticty Task Force of InterPARES.
72
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 1. 1989.
73
Ketelaar E. Archival Theory and the Dutch Manual.
74
Cook, Terry. The Concept of the Archival Fonds in the Post-Custodial Era: Theory, Problems and Solutions. Archivaria. 1993;35.
75
Muller, Samuel, Feith, Johan Adriaan, Fruin, R., et al. Manual for the arrangement and description of archives. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2003.
76
Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, Sweden. The principle of provenance: report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance 2-3 September 1993. [Stockholm]: Swedish National Archives 1994.
77
Brothman B. Orders of Value: Probing the Theoretical Terms of Archival Practice. 1991.
78
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense of Professional Rebirth:Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives.
79
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 2. 1989.
80
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 3. 1990.
81
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 4. 1990.
82
Duranti L. Diplomatics: New Uses for an Old Science 5. 1991.
83
Duranti, Luciana. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press 1998.
84
Duranti L. Reliability and Authenticity: The Concepts and Their Implications.
85
Duranti L, MacNeil H. The Protection of the Integrity of Electronic Records: An Overview of the UBC-MAS Research Project.
86
Eastwood T. Nailing a Little Jelly to the Wall of Archival Studies. 1993.
87
Eastwood T. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important?
88
Horsman P. The Last Dance of the Phoenix, or the De-discovery of the Archival Fonds.
89
MacNeil H. Archival Theory and Practice: Between Two Paradigms.
90
Nesmith T. Still Fuzzy, But More Accurate: Some Thoughts on the ‘Ghosts’ of Archival Theory. 1999.
91
Ridener, John. From Polders to postmodernism: a concise history of archival theory. Duluth, Minn: Litwin Books 2009.
92
Roberts J. Practice Makes Perfect, Theory Makes Theorists.
93
Roberts J. What is Archival Theory and Why is it Important? Response to Terry Eastwood’s Paper.
94
Duranti L. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal. 2010;20:78–95. doi: 10.1108/09565691011039852
95
Cumming K. Ways of seeing: contextualising the continuum. Records Management Journal. 2010;20:41–52. doi: 10.1108/09565691011036224
96
Mak B. On the Uses of Authenticity.
97
Geoffrey Yeo. The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection.
98
Yeo G. Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age.
99
Zhang J. Original Order in Digital Archives.
100
O’Meara E, Tuomala M. Finding Balance between Archival Principles and Real-Life Practices in an Institutional Repository.
101
Fear K, Donaldson DR. Provenance and credibility in scientific data repositories. Archival Science. 2012;12:319–39. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9172-7
102
Bazerman C. The orders of documents, the orders of activity, and the orders of information. Archival Science. 2012;12:377–88. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9178-1
103
Bunn J. Questioning autonomy: an alternative perspective on the principles which govern archival description. Archival Science. Published Online First: 12 March 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9200-2
104
Stan Godlovitch. Preserving, Restoring, Repairing. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 1989;23:39–47. doi: 10.2307/3332759
105
Cumming K, Picot A. Reinventing appraisal. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42:133–45. doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.926824
106
Cook T. ‘We Are What We Keep; We Keep What We Are’: Archival Appraisal Past, Present and Future. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2011;32:173–89. doi: 10.1080/00379816.2011.619688
107
Schellenberg TR. The Appraisal of Modern Records.
108
Significance 2.0: a guide to assessing the significance of collections - significance-2.0.pdf.
109
The National Archives Appraisal Policy Background Paper - The ‘Grigg System’ and Beyond.
110
Cook T. Macroappraisal in Theory and Practice: Origins, Characteristics, and Implementation in Canada, 1950–2000. Archival Science. 2006;5:101–61. doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-9010-2
111
Booms H. Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources. 1987.
112
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science. 2013;13:207–16. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
113
Abraham T. Collection Policy or Documentation Strategy: Theory and Practice. The American Archivist. 1991;54:44–52. doi: 10.17723/aarc.54.1.v2323483077xr227
114
Boles F, Young J. Exploring the Black Box: The Appraisal of University Administrative Records. The American Archivist. 1985;48:121–40. doi: 10.17723/aarc.48.2.1414g624328868vw
115
Williams C. Studying Reality: The Application of Theory in an Aspect of UK Practice.
116
Cox R. The Documentation Strategy and Archival Appraisal Principles: A Different Perspective.
117
Bailey C. Past Imperfect? Reflections on the Evolution of Canadian Federal Government Records Appraisal.
118
Cynthia K. Sauer. Doing the Best We Can? The Use of Collection Development Policies and Cooperative Collecting Activities at Manuscript Repositories. The American Archivist. 2001;64:308–49.
119
Wisniewski Timothy. Framers of the Kept: Against the Grain Appraisal of Ephemeral Moving Images. The Moving Image. 2008;7:1–24. doi: 10.1353/mov.2008.0002
120
Mancuso L. Archival appraisal in Brazil. Archives and Manuscripts. 2013;41:146–59. doi: 10.1080/01576895.2013.801101
121
Harvey R, Thompson D. Automating the appraisal of digital materials. Library Hi Tech. 2010;28:313–22. doi: 10.1108/07378831011047703
122
The Almost Accidental Archive and its Impact on Literary Subjects and Canonicity. Journal of Canadian Studies/Revue d’études canadiennes. 2007;40:96–108.
123
Cook M. Appraisal and access: We should expect changes driven by the media and by public awareness. Records Management Journal. 2010;20:72–7. doi: 10.1108/09565691011039843
124
Kim Y, Ross S. Closing the loop: Assisting archival appraisal and information retrieval in one sweep. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013;50:1–10. doi: 10.1002/meet.14505001042
125
The National Geospatial Digital Archives—Collection Development: Lessons Learned. Library Trends. 2009;57:490–515. doi: 10.1353/lib.0.0049
126
Eastwood T. Reflections on the Goal of Archival Appraisal in Demoncratic Societies.
127
Pollard R. The Appraisal of Personal Papers: A Critical Literature Review.
128
Carvalho C. Appraisal based on organic functional analysis: a case study in an electronic records environment. Records Management Journal. 2001;11:175–205. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007274
129
Jones S, Abbott D, Ross S. Redefining the performing arts archive. Archival Science. 2009;9:165–71. doi: 10.1007/s10502-009-9086-1
130
FORTIER N. Transparency, Compliance, and Accountability: Developing a Knowledge Infrastructure for Macroappraisal at Library and Archives Canada. Archival Science. 2005;5:343–60. doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-9005-z
131
Kärberg T. Digital preservation of knowledge in the public sector: a pre-ingest tool. Archival Science. Published Online First: 13 September 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9211-z
132
Conway P. Digital transformations and the archival nature of surrogates. Archival Science. Published Online First: 20 April 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9219-z
133
Sims F. A new appraisal approach for English Heritage. Records Management Journal. 2002;12:8–13. doi: 10.1108/09565690210427743
134
Cox, Richard J. No innocent deposits: forming archives by rethinking appraisal. Lanham, Md: Scarecrow Press 2004.
135
Boles, Frank. Selecting & appraising archives & manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2005.
136
Cook, Terry, Samuels, Helen Willa. Controlling the past: documenting society and institutions : essays in honor of Helen Willa Samuels. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2011.
137
Arias PB. Appraising the value of statistical records of the European Central Bank for retention scheduling purposes. Records Management Journal. 2008;18:205–20. doi: 10.1108/09565690810916456
138
Samuels H. Improving our disposition: documentation strategy. Archivaria. 1991;33.
139
Jonker AEM. No Privileged Past—Acquisition Revisited. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2009;30:67–80. doi: 10.1080/00379810903264625
140
SCOTT M. Functional appraisal of records: a methodology. Records Management Journal. 1997;7:101–14. doi: 10.1108/eb027107
141
Tschan R. A Comparison of Jenkinson and Schellenberg on Appraisal. The American Archivist. 2002;65:176–95. doi: 10.17723/aarc.65.2.920w65g3217706l1
142
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Archiving for self-ascertainment, identity-building and permanent self-questioning: archives between scepticism and certitude. Archival Science. 2013;13:207–16. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9189-y
143
Cox R, Samuels H. The Archivist’s First Responsibility: A Research Agenda to Improve the Identification and Retention of Records of Enduring Value. The American Archivist. 1988;51:28–42. doi: 10.17723/aarc.51.1-2.gkw67424l3344ug8
144
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. 2007.
145
Alexander P, Samuels H. The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist. 1987;50:518–31. doi: 10.17723/aarc.50.4.v889q1182r11p36u
146
Honer E, Graham S. Should Users Have a Role in Determining the Future Archive? The Approach Adopted by the Public Record Office, the UK National Archive, to the Selection of Records for Permanent Preservation | Honer | LIBER Quarterly.
147
Kretzschmar R. Archival Appraisal in Germany: A Decade of Theory, Strategies, and Practices. Archival Science. 2006;5:219–38. doi: 10.1007/s10502-005-9014-y
148
Craig, Barbara Lazenby. Archival appraisal: theory and practice. München: K.G. Saur 2004.
149
The Institute of Conservation Professional Standards in Conservation.
150
Jenkinson H. A manual of archive administration. 2nd ed. reprinted. Lund, Humphries 1965.
151
Duranti L. Origin and Development of the Concept of Archival Description | Duranti | Archivaria. Archivaria. 1992;35.
152
Duff WM, Harris V. Stories and names: Archival description as narrating records and constructing meanings. Archival Science. 2002;2:263–85. doi: 10.1007/BF02435625
153
Huvila I. Participatory archive: towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science. 2008;8:15–36. doi: 10.1007/s10502-008-9071-0
154
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives, ICA Congress Brisbane 2012. 2012.
155
Menne-Haritz A. Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science. 2001;1:57–82. doi: 10.1007/BF02435639
156
Yakel E. Archival representation. Archival Science. 2003;3:1–25. doi: 10.1007/BF02438926
157
Clough P, Tang J, Hall MM, et al. Linking archival data to location: a case study at the UK National Archives. Aslib Proceedings. 2011;63:127–47. doi: 10.1108/00012531111135628
158
Schellenberg, T. R. Modern archives: principles and techniques. Melbourne: F.W. Cheshire 1956.
159
Bunn J. Developing descriptive standards: a renewed call to action. Archives and Records. 2013;1–13. doi: 10.1080/23257962.2013.830066
160
Ruddock B. Linked Data and the LOCAH project. Business Information Review. 2011;28:105–11. doi: 10.1177/0266382111404013
161
The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model.
162
Wood S, Carbone K, Cifor M, et al. Mobilizing records: re-framing archival description to support human rights. Archival Science. 2014;14:397–419. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9233-1
163
Eito-Brun R. Context-based aggregation of archival data: the role of authority records in the semantic landscape. Archival Science. Published Online First: 2 February 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9215-3
164
Council of Europe. Access to official documents Recommendation Rec (2002) 2 of the Committee of Ministers and explanatory memorandum. 2003.
165
Niu J. Event-based archival information organization. Archival Science. Published Online First: 13 June 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9222-4
166
Gracy KF. Archival description and linked data: a preliminary study of opportunities and implementation challenges. Archival Science. Published Online First: 27 February 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9216-2
167
Valge J, Kibal B. Restrictions on Access to Archives and Records in Europe: A History and the Current Situation. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28:193–214. doi: 10.1080/00379810701611951
168
Blais G. Access to Archival Records: A Review of Current Issues: A RAMP Study. 1995.
169
Public Sector Information | Europa - Information Society.
170
Open Government Data | Open Knowledge Foundation Blog.
171
The National Archives. The United Kingdom Report on the Re-use of Public Sector Information.
172
Council of Europe - Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents (CETS No. 205). 2009.
173
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology). 1996.
174
Barbara Reed. Beyond Perceived Boundaries: Imagining the potential of pluralised recordkeeping.
175
Christen K. Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. The American Archivist. 2011;74:185–210. doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.1.4233nv6nv6428521
176
Flanagan M, Carini P. How Games Can Help Us Access and Understand Archival Images. The American Archivist. 2012;75:514–37. doi: 10.17723/aarc.75.2.b424537w27970gu4
177
Duff W, Johnson C. Where Is the List with All the Names? Information-Seeking Behavior of Genealogists. The American Archivist. 2003;66:79–95. doi: 10.17723/aarc.66.1.l375uj047224737n
178
Prom C. Using Web Analytics to Improve Online Access to Archival Resources. The American Archivist. 2011;74:158–84. doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.1.h56018515230417v
179
Fear K. User Understanding of Metadata in Digital Image Collections: Or, What Exactly Do You Mean by ‘Coverage’? The American Archivist. 2010;73:26–60. doi: 10.17723/aarc.73.1.j00044lr77415551
180
Daniels M, Yakel E. Seek and You May Find: Successful Search in Online Finding Aid Systems. The American Archivist. 2010;73:535–68. doi: 10.17723/aarc.73.2.p578900680650357
181
Altman B, Nemmers J. The Usability of On-line Archival Resources: The Polaris Project Finding Aid. The American Archivist. 2001;64:121–31. doi: 10.17723/aarc.64.1.80300272655rqu74
182
Yakel E, Bost LL. Understanding Administrative Use and Users in University Archives - American Archivist - Volume 57, Number 4 / Fall 1994 - Society of American Archivists. The American Archivist.
183
Yakel E, Torres D. AI: Archival Intelligence and User Expertise. The American Archivist. 2003;66:51–78. doi: 10.17723/aarc.66.1.q022h85pn51n5800
184
The Guide to Researching Audiences.
185
Daines JG, Nimer CL. Re-Imagining Archival Display: Creating User-Friendly Finding Aids. Journal of Archival Organization. 2011;9:4–31. doi: 10.1080/15332748.2011.574019
186
Sexton A, Turner C, Yeo G, et al. Understanding users: a prerequisite for developing new technologies. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25:33–49. doi: 10.1080/0037981042000199133
187
Chapman A. Collection-level description: Joining up the domains. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25:149–55. doi: 10.1080/0037981042000271475
188
Hill A. Serving the invisible researcher: Meeting the needs of online users. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2004;25:139–48. doi: 10.1080/0037981042000271466
189
Guide to archival software.
190
Ismail A, Jamaludin A. Records professionals: an invisible profession in Malaysia. Records Management Journal. 2011;21:69–75. doi: 10.1108/09565691111125116
191
Procter M. What’s an ‘Archivist’? Some Nineteenth-Century Perspectives. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2010;31:15–27. doi: 10.1080/00379811003658476
192
Broady-Preston J. The information professional of the future: polymath or dinosaur? Library Management. 2010;31:66–78. doi: 10.1108/01435121011013412
193
Neazor M. Recordkeeping Professional Ethics and their Application. Published Online First: 2007.
194
Dingwall G. Trusting Archivists: The Role of Archival Ethics Codes in Establishing Public Faith. The American Archivist. 2004;67:11–30. doi: 10.17723/aarc.67.1.mw0914r2p52xx2t4
195
Cline S. ‘To the Limit of Our Integrity’: Reflections on Archival Being. The American Archivist. 2009;72:331–43. doi: 10.17723/aarc.72.2.g0321510717r6j14
196
Gale C. Record-keeping as an ethical imperative. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2006;27:17–27. doi: 10.1080/00039810600691221
197
Shepherd, Elizabeth. Gatekeepers to the Profession: Archival e ducation, 1880–1980. Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: Ashgate 2009.
198
Jenkinson, Hilary. The English archivist: a new profession. London: H.K. Lewis 1948.
199
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. Published Online First: 3 September 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
200
Elizabeth G, Rebecca S. ‘Golden Age,’ Quiescence, and Revival: How the Sociology of Professions Became the Study of Knowledge-Based Work.
201
Currall J, Moss M. We are archivists, but are we OK? Records Management Journal. 2008;18:69–91. doi: 10.1108/09565690810858532
202
McLeod J, Hare C. Development of RMJ: A mirror of the development of the profession and discipline of records management. Records Management Journal. 2010;20:9–40. doi: 10.1108/09565691011036215
203
Benedict, Karen M., Society of American Archivists. Ethics and the archival profession: introduction and case studies. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2003.
204
Cook M. Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context ∗. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2006;27:1–15. doi: 10.1080/00039810600691205
205
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: Facet 2006.
206
Danielson, Elena S. The ethical archivist. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2010.
207
MacNeil, Heather. Without consent: the ethics of disclosing personal information in public archives. [Chicago, Ill.]: Scarecrow Press 1992.
208
Procter, Margaret, Lewis, C. P., Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies. New directions in archival research. Liverpool: Liverpool University Centre for Archive Studies 2000.
209
Shepherd E. Archives and archivists in 20th century England. Farnham: Ashgate 2009.
210
Cook T. Fashionable Nonsense or Professional Rebirth: Postmodernism and the Practice of Archives. Archivaria. 2001;51.
211
Harris V. Claiming Less, Delivering More: A Critique of Positivist Formulations on Archives in South Africa. Archivaria. 1997;44.
212
Greene M. A Critique of Social Justice as an Archival Imperative: What It We’re Doing That’s All That Important? The American Archivist. 2013;76:302–34. doi: 10.17723/aarc.76.2.14744l214663kw43
213
Jimerson R. Archivists and Social Responsibility: A Response to Mark Greene. The American Archivist. 2013;76:335–45. doi: 10.17723/aarc.76.2.2627p15350572t21
214
Caswell M. Not Just Between Us: A Riposte to Mark Greene / Letter to the Editor. American Archivist. 2013;76.
215
Bastian J. Taking Custody, Giving Access: A Postcustodial Role for a New Century. Archivaria. 2002.
216
MacNeil H. Trust and professional identity: narratives, counter-narratives and lingering ambiguities. Archival Science. 2011;11:175–92. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9150-5
217
Duranti L. Archives as place. Archives & Social Studies: A Journal of Interdisciplinary Research.
218
Gilliland A. Neutrality, social justice and the obligations of archival education and educators in the twenty-first century. Archival Science. 2011;11:193–209. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9147-0
219
Duff WM, Flinn A, Suurtamm KE, et al. Social justice impact of archives: a preliminary investigation. Archival Science. 2013;13. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
220
Jimerson, Randall C., Society of American Archivists. Archives power: memory, accountability, and social justice. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2009.
221
Flinn A. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions [eScholarship]. interActions UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies. 2011;7.
222
Bastian J. A Question of Custody: The Colonial Archives of the United States Virgin Islands. The American Archivist. 2001;64:96–114. doi: 10.17723/aarc.64.1.h6k872252u2gr377
223
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 2013;41:7–22. doi: 10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
224
Frank Upward. Structuring the Records Continuum - Part One: Postcustodial principles and properties (Information Technology). 1996.
225
Brothman B. Declining Derrida: Integrity, Tensegrity, and the Preservation of Archives from Deconstruction. Archivaria. 1999;48.
226
Findlay C. People, records and power: what archives can learn from WikiLeaks. Archives and Manuscripts. 2013;41:7–22. doi: 10.1080/01576895.2013.779926
227
Tom Nesmith. Seeing Archives: Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. American Archivist. 2002;65.
228
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World. Archivaria. 2001;51.
229
Schwartz JM, Cook T. Archives, records, and power: The making of modern memory. Archival Science. 2002;2:1–19. doi: 10.1007/BF02435628
230
Cook T. Electronic Records, Paper Minds: The Revolution in Information Management and Archives in the Post-Custodial and Post-Modernist Era. Archives & Social Studies. 2007.
231
Ham G. Archival Strategies for the Post-Custodial Era. The American Archivist. 1981;44–3.
232
Kallberg M. Archivists 2.0: redefining the archivist’s profession in the digital age. Records Management Journal. 2012;22:98–115. doi: 10.1108/09565691211268162
233
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms - Online First - Springer. Archival Science.
234
Joseph P, Debowski S, Goldschmidt P. Paradigm shifts in recordkeeping responsibilities: implications for ISO 15489’s implementation. Records Management Journal. 2012;22:57–75. doi: 10.1108/09565691211222108
235
Flinn A, Shepherd E. Questions of trust (and distrust). Archival Science. 2011;11:169–74. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9169-7
236
Cook T, Schwartz JM. Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance. Archival Science. 2002;2:171–85. doi: 10.1007/BF02435620
237
Cook T. Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts. Archival Science. 2001;1:3–24. doi: 10.1007/BF02435636
238
Harris V. The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa. Archival Science. 2002;2:63–86. doi: 10.1007/BF02435631
239
Ketelaar E. Archives as Spaces of Memory. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29:9–27. doi: 10.1080/00379810802499678
240
Cline S. "Dust Clouds of Camels Shall Cover You”: Covenant and the Archival Endeavor. American Archivist. Published Online First: 2012.
241
Sachs A. Archives, Truth, and Reconciliation. Archivaria. 2006;62.
242
Hamilton, Carolyn. Refiguring the archive. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic 2002.
243
Derrida, Jacques, Prenowitz, Eric. Archive fever: a Freudian impression. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1996.
244
Sachs HR. Reconstructing a Life: The Archival Challenges of Women’s History. Library Trends. 2008;56:650–66. doi: 10.1353/lib.2008.0018
245
Dirks J. Accountability, History, and Archives: Conflicting Priorities or Synthesized Strands? Archivaria. 2004;57.
246
Cook T. Evidence, memory, identity, and community: four shifting archival paradigms. Archival Science. 2013;13:95–120. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7
247
Jacobsen T, Punzalan RL, Hedstrom ML. Invoking "collective memory”: mapping the emergence of a concept in archival science. Archival Science. 2013;13:217–51. doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9199-4
248
Greene M. The Power of Meaning: The Archival Mission in the Postmodern Age -. American Archivist. 2002;65.
249
MacNeil H. Trusting Records in a Postmodern World.
250
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 2014;14:215–29. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
251
Birkinshaw P. Government and information: the law relating to access, disclosure and their regulation. 3rd ed. Haywards Heath: Tottel 2005.
252
Birkinshaw P. Freedom of information: the law, the practice and the ideal. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.
253
MacNeil, Heather, Eastwood, Terry. Currents of archival thinking vol 1. Oxford: Libraries Unlimited 2010.
254
Meijer A. Accountability in an Information Age: Opportunities and Risks for Records Management - ProQuest.
255
Strauss A. Treading the ground of contested memory: archivists and the human rights movement in Chile. Archival Science. Published Online First: 3 September 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9223-3
256
Interview with Dr Anne Thurston on Open Government and trustworthy records | Gov 2.0 Radio.
257
Tough A. Accountability, open government and record keeping: time to think again? Records Management Journal. 2011;21:225–36. doi: 10.1108/09565691111186894
258
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: Quorum Books 2002.
259
Halilovich H. Reclaiming erased lives: archives, records and memories in post-war Bosnia and the Bosnian diaspora. Archival Science. 2014;14:231–47. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9227-z
260
Harris V. Antonyms of our remembering. Archival Science. 2014;14:215–29. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9221-5
261
Adami TA, Hunt M. Genocidal Archives: The African Context—Genocide in Rwanda. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2005;26:105–21. doi: 10.1080/00039810500047557
262
Gilliland AJ. Moving past: probing the agency and affect of recordkeeping in individual and community lives in post-conflict Croatia. Archival Science. 2014;14:249–74. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9231-3
263
Caron DJ, Kellerhals A. Supporting Democratic Values Through a Relevant Documentary Foundation - An Evolutionary Complex.
264
Robinson G. Break the rules, save the records: human rights archives and the search for justice in East Timor. Archival Science. 2014;14:323–43. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9228-y
265
Wallace, David A., Cox, Richard J. Archives and the public good: accountability and records in modern society. London: Quorum Books 2002.
266
Cox, Richard J. Ethics, accountability and recordkeeping in a dangerous world. London: Facet 2006.
267
McKemmish, Sue, Charles Sturt University. Archives: recordkeeping in society. Wagga Wagga, N.S.W.: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University 2005.
268
Procter, Margaret, Cook, Michael, Williams, Caroline. Political pressure and the archival record. Chicago: Society of American Archivists 2005.
269
Lemieux VL. The records-risk nexus: exploring the relationship between records and risk. Records Management Journal. 2010;20:199–216. doi: 10.1108/09565691011064331
270
Wamukoya J. Records and archives as a basis for good government: implications and challenges for records managers and archivists in Africa. Records Management Journal. 2000;10:23–33. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000007254
271
Dominy G. ‘We must remember our past so that we do not repeat it’ Archiving and Accessing the Records of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2005.
272
Hurley C. Recordkeeping, Document Destruction and the Law (Heiner, Enron and McCabe). 2002;30.
273
Hurley C. Archivists and Accountability. 2006;34.
274
Jimerson RC. Ripples across the pond: global implications of the Heiner Affair. 2011;39.
275
Caswell M, Mallick S. Collecting the easily missed stories: digital participatory microhistory and the South Asian American Digital Archive. Archives and Manuscripts. 2014;42:73–86. doi: 10.1080/01576895.2014.880931
276
Ray J. Sharks, digital curation, and the education of information professionals. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2009;24:357–68. doi: 10.1080/09647770903314720
277
Cunningham A. Digital Curation/Digital Archiving: A View from the National Archives of Australia. The American Archivist. 2008;71:530–43. doi: 10.17723/aarc.71.2.p0h0t68547385507
278
Daniel D. Archival representations of immigration and ethnicity in North American history: from the ethnicization of archives to the archivization of ethnicity. Archival Science. Published Online First: 1 August 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9209-6
279
Wakimoto DK, Bruce C, Partridge H. Archivist as activist: lessons from three queer community archives in California. Archival Science. 2013;13:293–316. doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9201-1
280
Theimer K. What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? The American Archivist. 2011;74:58–68. doi: 10.17723/aarc.74.1.h7tn4m4027407666
281
Caswell M. Toward a survivor-centered approach to records documenting human rights abuse: lessons from community archives. Archival Science. 2014;14:307–22. doi: 10.1007/s10502-014-9220-6
282
Archival Science, Volume 8, Issue 4 - Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives and Museums in the Information Age. http://link.springer.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/journal/10502/8/4/page/1
283
Marty PF. An Introduction to Digital Convergence: Libraries, Archives, and Museums in the Information Age. The Library Quarterly. 2010;80:1–5. doi: 10.1086/648549
284
Museum Management and Curatorship - Volume 24, Issue 4. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rmmc20/24/4
285
Hill, Jennie. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: Facet 2011.
286
Lappin J. What will be the next records management orthodoxy? Records Management Journal. 2010;20:252–64. doi: 10.1108/09565691011095283
287
Cumming K, Findlay C. Digital recordkeeping: are we at a tipping point? Records Management Journal. 2010;20:265–78. doi: 10.1108/09565691011095292
288
Higgins S. Digital Curation: The Emergence of a New Discipline. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2011;6. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v6i2.191
289
Lau AJ, Gilliland AJ, Anderson K. NATURALIZING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN INFORMATION STUDIES. Information, Communication & Society. 2012;15:991–1015. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.630404
290
Abrams S, Cruse P, Kunze J. Preservation Is Not a Place. International Journal of Digital Curation. 2009;4. doi: 10.2218/ijdc.v4i1.72
291
Cole J, Nolan J, Seko Y, et al. GimpGirl grows up: Women with disabilities rethinking, redefining, and reclaiming community. New Media & Society. 2011;13:1161–79. doi: 10.1177/1461444811398032
292
Robinson H. Remembering things differently: museums, libraries and archives as memory institutions and the implications for convergence. Museum Management and Curatorship. 2012;27:413–29. doi: 10.1080/09647775.2012.720188
293
Lee C, Tibbo H. Where’s the Archivist in Digital Curation? Exploring the Possibities through a Matrix of Knowledge and Skills. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13362/14668
294
Elke Zobl. Cultural Production, Transnational Networking, and Critical Reflection in Feminist Zines. Signs. 2009;35:1–12. doi: 10.1086/599256
295
Crymble A. An Analysis of Twitter and Facebook Use by the Archival Community. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13298/14609
296
EICHHORN K. D.I.Y. Collectors, Archiving Scholars, and Activist Librarians: Legitimizing Feminist Knowledge and Cultural Production Since 1990. Women’s Studies. 2010;39:622–46. doi: 10.1080/00497878.2010.490716
297
Baker S, Huber A. Notes towards a typology of the DIY institution: Identifying do-it-yourself places of popular music preservation. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 2013;16:513–30. doi: 10.1177/1367549413491721
298
Timms K. New Partnerships for Old Sibling Rivals: The Development of Integrated Access Systems for the Holdings of Archives, Libraries and Museums. http://journals.sfu.ca.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13230/14549
299
Marsden C. Sectors and Domains: Some reflections on co-operation and integration. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2001;22:17–23. doi: 10.1080/00379810120037469
300
Ceeney N. The Role of a 21st-century National Archive—The Relevance of the Jenkinsonian Tradition, and a Redefinition for the Information Society. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29:57–71. doi: 10.1080/00379810802499868
301
Shilton K, Srinivasan R. Participatory Appraisal and Arrangement for Multicultural Archival Collections. Archivaria. 2007;63.
302
Iacovino L. Rethinking archival, ethical and legal frameworks for records of Indigenous Australian communities: a participant relationship model of rights and responsibilities. Archival Science. 2010;10:353–72. doi: 10.1007/s10502-010-9120-3
303
Newman J. Revisiting Archive Collections: Developing Models for Participatory Cataloguing. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2012;33:57–73. doi: 10.1080/00379816.2012.666404
304
Exploring Heritage in Participatory Culture: The MuseumApp | museumsandtheweb.com. http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2011/papers/exploring_heritage_in_participatory_culture_th
305
Stevens M, Flinn A, Shepherd E. New frameworks for community engagement in the archive sector: from handing over to handing on. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2010;16:59–76. doi: 10.1080/13527250903441770
306
Moore S, Pell S. Autonomous archives. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2010;16:255–68. doi: 10.1080/13527251003775513
307
Flinn, Andrew. Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History and the Heritage Professions. Interactions: UCLA journal of education and information studies. 2011;7.
308
Flinn, A. The Impact of independent and community archives on professional archival thinking and practice. The future of archives and recordkeeping: a reader. London: Facet 2011.
309
Flinn, A. Independent Community Archives and Community-Generated Content: ‘Writing, Saving and Sharing our Histories’. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2010;16:39–51. doi: 10.1177/1354856509347707
310
Flinn A, Stevens M, Shepherd E. Whose memories, whose archives? Independent community archives, autonomy and the mainstream. Archival Science. 2009;9:71–86. doi: 10.1007/s10502-009-9105-2
311
Flinn, A., Stevens, M. "It is noh mistri, wi mekin histri”. Telling Our Own Story: Independent and Community Archives in the United Kingdom, Challenging and Subverting the Mainstream. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: Facet 2009.
312
Flinn A. Community Histories, Community Archives: Some Opportunities and Challenges. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2007;28:151–76. doi: 10.1080/00379810701611936
313
Bastian, Jeannette Allis, Alexander, Ben. Community archives: the shaping of memory. London: Facet 2009.
314
Gray V. ‘Who’s that Knocking on Our Door?’: Archives, Outreach and Community. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29:1–8. doi: 10.1080/00379810802499652
315
Flinn, A., Pick, G. Diversifying and deomcratising archive collections - an agenda for transformation. Embedding shared heritage: the Heritage Diversity Task Force report. London: Greater London Authority 2009.
316
Hopkins I. Places From Which to Speak. Journal of the Society of Archivists. 2008;29:83–109. doi: 10.1080/00379810802515069
317
Anderson S, Allen R. Envisioning the Archival Commons. The American Archivist. 2009;72:383–400. doi: 10.17723/aarc.72.2.g54085061q586416
318
Yaco S, Hardy BB. Historians, archivists, and social activism: benefits and costs. Archival Science. 2013;13:253–72. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0
319
Kalfatovic MR, Kapsalis E, Spiess KP, et al. Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Archival Science. 2008;8:267–77. doi: 10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
320
Sinn D, Syn SY. Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science. Published Online First: 14 July 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10502-013-9208-7
321
Eveleigh A. Welcoming the World: An Exploration of Participatory Archives. Published Online First: 2012.
322
Ramírez M. The Task of the Latino/a Archivist: On Archiving Identity and Community. Studies [eScholarship]. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), Article 3. Published Online First: 2009.
323
Green LJF. Cultural heritage, archives & citizenship: 1. Critical Arts. 2007;21:308–20. doi: 10.1080/02560040701810073
324
Ormond-Parker L, Sloggett R. Local archives and community collecting in the digital age. Archival Science. 2012;12:191–212. doi: 10.1007/s10502-011-9154-1
