1.
Bradbrook A. Energy Law as an Academic Discipline. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 14(2):193–217. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
2.
Redgwell C. International Regulation of Energy Activities. Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 18–23.
3.
Redgwell C. International Regulation of Energy Activities. Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 18–23.
4.
Krieger H, de Boer C, Steeg H. International Organizations and their Activities in the Energy Sector. Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 97–169.
5.
Shaw MN. Sources. International law. 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
6.
Harris DJ. Cases and materials on international law. 7th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
7.
Brownlie I. Principles of public international law. 4th ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990.
8.
Higgins R. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1994.
9.
Thirlway H. The Sources of International Law. International law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
10.
Redgwell C. International Regulation of Energy Activities. Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 23–40.
11.
Hickey JE. International Law. Energy law and policy for the 21st century. Denver, Colo: Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation; 2000.
12.
Redgwell C. International Soft Law and Globalisation. Regulating energy and natural resources [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299874.001.0001
13.
Wood M. What Is Public International Law? The Need for Clarity about Sources. Asian Journal of International Law. 1(2):205–216.
14.
Cassese A. International law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
15.
Boyle AE, Chinkin CM. The making of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
16.
Wood M. First report on formation and evidence of customary international law, A/CN.4/663 [Internet]. International Law Commission; 17AD. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/sessions/65/jourchr.htm
17.
United Nations. General Assembly Resolution 1803 Declaration on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources 1962 [Internet]. 1962. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/resources.pdf
18.
United Nations. General Assembly Resolution 3201, Declaration on the Establishment of a the New International Economic Order [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/s6r3201.htm
19.
United Nations. General Assembly Resolution 3281, Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm
20.
London School of Economics & Political Science. Texaco v Libya; BP v. Libya. International law reports. London: Butterworth; 1977;
21.
Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
22.
Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
23.
A.V. Lowe. Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments. International Law and Sustainable Development [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 19–37. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL_LMS_DS%29&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1409838950094&srt=rank&ct=search&mode=Basic&dum=true&indx=1&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=International%20Law%20and%20Sustainable%20Development%20&fn=search&vid=UCL_VU1
24.
Schrijver N. Sovereignty over natural resources: balancing rights and duties [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511560118
25.
Brownlie I. Legal Status of Natural Resources in International Law: Some Aspects. Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de Droit International. Leiden : Sijthoff; 1979;162:253–310.
26.
Sands P. International Law in the Field of Sustainable Development. British Yearbook of International Law. 1994;65(1):303–381.
27.
Schrijver N. Sovereignty over natural resources: balancing rights and duties [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511560118
28.
Nico Schrijver. The evolution of sustainable development in international law [Internet]. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2008. Available from: https://brill.com/display/title/16576
29.
Bradbrook AJ, Wahnschafft RD. A Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on Sustainable Energy Production and Consumption. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law [Internet]. 19(2):143–163. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jenrl19&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=1&men_tab=srchresults&terms=A|J|Bradbrook|R|D|Wahnschafft,&type=matchall
30.
French D. International law and policy of sustainable development. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2005.
31.
Hosena K, Chowdhury SR. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources in international law: principle and practice. London: Pinter; 1984.
32.
Crawford, James, Brownlie, Ian. Brownlie’s principles of public international law [Internet]. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/he/9780199699698.001.0001/he-9780199699698
33.
Redgwell C. International Regulation of Energy Activities. Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
34.
Higgins R. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1994.
35.
Evans MD. International law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
36.
The American Journal of International Law. American Society of International Law; 96(3). Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/i354971
37.
Crawford J, Brownlie I. Brownlie’s principles of public international law. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
38.
Evans MD. International law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
39.
Evans MD, Capps P. International law. Farnham: Ashgate Pub. Limited; 2009.
40.
Collier JG, Lowe AV. The settlement of disputes in international law: institutions and procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
41.
Higgins R. Natural Resources in the Case Law of the International Court. International law and sustainable development : past achievements and future challenges [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. p. 87–112. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma990016213520204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,International%20law%20and%20sustainable%20development%20:%20past%20achievements%20and%20future&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9018465781551939746&offset=0
42.
Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
43.
Sachariew K. Promoting Compliance with International Environmental Legal Standards: Reflections on Monitoring and Reporting Mechanisms. Yearbook of International Environmental Law [Internet]. 1992;2(1):31–52. Available from: http://yielaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/2/1.toc
44.
Evans MD, Capps P. International law. Farnham: Ashgate Pub. Limited; 2009.
45.
Crawford J, Brownlie I. Brownlie’s principles of public international law. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
46.
Chorzow Factory Case (Indemnity) PCIJ Series A, No. 17 [Internet]. International Court of Justice; 13AD. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/series-a.php?p1=9&p2=1
47.
Mexico--United States: Expropriation by Mexico of Agrarian Properties Owned by American Citizens (Hull formula). The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 32(4):181–207. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2213733
48.
United Nations. General Assembly Resolution 1803 Declaration on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources 1962 [Internet]. 1962. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/resources.pdf
49.
United Nations. General Assembly Resolution 3281, Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm
50.
American-Mexican Claims Commission. North American Dredging Company of Texas (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States - 4 RIAA 26 [Internet]. 1926. Available from: http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_IV/26-35.pdf
51.
Patrick M. Norton. A Law of the Future or a Law of the Past? Modern Tribunals and the International Law of Expropriation. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 85(3):474–505. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2203108?origin=crossref
52.
Waelde T, Kolo A. Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and ‘Regulatory Taking’ in International Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 50(4):811–848. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/761516
53.
Lowenfeld AF. The Responsibility of Host States to Foreign Investors: Customary International Law. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 467–494.
54.
Lowenfeld AF. Dispute Settlement and International Investment. International economic law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 495–534.
55.
Muchlinski P. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
56.
Higgins R. The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law. Recueil des cours de l’Académie de Droit International. Leiden : Sijthoff; 1982;176.
57.
Akinsanya AA. The expropriation of multinational property in the Third World. New York, N.Y.: Praeger; 1980.
58.
Brewer TL, Young S. The multilateral investment system and multinational enterprises [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198293156.001.0001
59.
Hosena K, Chowdhury SR. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources in international law: principle and practice. London: Pinter; 1984.
60.
Mouri A. The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. claims tribunal. Dordrecht: M. Nijhoff; 1994.
61.
Sornarajah M. The international law on foreign investment [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511841439
62.
Sornarajah M. The settlement of foreign investment disputes. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2000.
63.
Cameron PD, Schwebel SM. International energy investment law: the pursuit of stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
64.
Bamberger C, Waelde T. The Energy Charter Treaty. Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
65.
Waern KP. Transit Provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty and the Energy Charter Protocol on Transit. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 20(2):172–191. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
66.
Azaria D. Energy Transit under the Energy Charter Treaty and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law [Internet]. 27(4):559–596. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jenrl27&id=567&collection=journals&index=journals/jenrl#567
67.
Ehring L, Selivanova Y. Energy Transit. Regulation of energy in international trade law: WTO, NAFTA, and Energy Charter. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International; 2012. p. 49–104.
68.
Fatouros A. An International Legal Framework for Energy. Recueil des cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye: Collected courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Leiden: Sijthoff; 2008;(332):355–446.
69.
Layard A. The European Energy Charter Treaty: Tipping the Balance between Energy and Environment. European Environmental Law Review [Internet]. Kluwer Law International; 1995;4(5):150–156. Available from: https://www.swetswise.com/swoc-web/details.html;jsessionid=B178A551ABE30B606CE709FB7F5816F4.ap-tc-p1?journalId=526460&yevoId=3325754
70.
Pascal Laffont. An Energy Charter protocol on transit. International Energy Law & Taxation Review. Sweet & Maxwell; 2003;8:239–249.
71.
Papioannou A. Security of Energy Supply: the Approach in the European Union and the Contribution of the Energy Charter Treaty. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law [Internet]. 1995;2(1):34–62. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/maastje2&id=36&collection=journals&index=journals/maastje#36
72.
Waelde T. Sustainable Development and the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty. International economic law with a human face. The Hague [etc.]: Kluwer Law International; 1998.
73.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade [Internet]. World Trade Organization; Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_e.pdf
74.
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes - Annex 2 [Internet]. World Trade Organization; 1994. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/28-dsu.pdf
75.
Palmeter ND, Mavroidis PC. Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization: practice and procedure [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177931
76.
Waelde T, Gunst A. International Energy Trade and Access to Energy Networks. Energy and Environmental Services: Negotiating Objectives and Development Priorities - UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/2003/3 [Internet]. 2003. p. 118–163. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/docs/ditctncd20033p1_en.pdf
77.
Appellate Body Report, US - Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R [Internet]. World Trade Organization; 20AD. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm#results
78.
Appellate Body Report, China — Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials, WT/DS394/AB/R, WT/DS395/AB/R, WT/DS398/AB/R [Internet]. World Trade Organization; 22AD. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm#results
79.
Desta MG. OPEC, the WTO and Regional Trading Agreements. Journal of World Trade [Internet]. 37(3):523–551. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=TRAD2003026
80.
Karapinar B. Defining the Legal Boundaries of Export Restrictions: A Case Law Analysis. Journal of International Economic Law. 2012;15(2):443–479.
81.
World Trade Organization. World Trade Report 2010 – Trade in Natural Resources [Internet]. World Trade Organization; 2010. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/world_trade_report10_e.pdf
82.
Desta MG. The GATT/WTO system and international trade in petroleum. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 21(4):385–398. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
83.
Zarrilli S. The Doha Work Programme: possible impact on energy trade and on domestic policies in energy-producing developing countries. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 21(4):399–412. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
84.
Frasl I. The trade rules of GATT and related instruments and the Energy Charter Treaty. Energy Charter Treaty: selected topics. Dundee: University of Dundee, Centre for Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy; 1995.
85.
Evans PC. Strengthening WTO member commitments in energy services: problems and prospects. Domestic regulation and service trade liberalization. Washington, DC: Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 167–189.
86.
Zarrilli S. Domestic Taxation of Energy Products and Multilateral Trade Rules: Is This a Case of Unlawful Discrimination? Journal of World Trade [Internet]. Kluwer Law International; 37(2):359–394. Available from: https://www.swetswise.com/swoc-web/linkingDetails.html?openURL=false&issn=1011-6702&eissn=1011-6702&volume=37&issue=2&page=359
87.
United Nations. U.N. Charter [Internet]. United Nations; 1945. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf
88.
United Nations. U.N. Charter [Internet]. United Nations; 1945. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf
89.
International Court of Justice Reports. Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment [Internet]. 27AD. p. 14–14. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=367&p1=3&p2=3&case=70&p3=5
90.
International Committee of the Red Cross. Geneva Conventions 1949 [Internet]. 12AD. Available from: https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/365?OpenDocument
91.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Prosecutor v Tadić (Appeals Chamber, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) ICTY-94-1 [Internet]. 2AD. Available from: http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm
92.
Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America) (Preliminary Objection) ICJ Rep. 847 [Internet]. International Court of Justice; 1996. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=468&code=op&p1=3&p2=3&case=90&k=0a&p3=5
93.
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Advisory Opinion [Internet]. International Court of Justice; 8AD. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/95/7495.pdf
94.
Gardam J. Energy and the Law of Armed Conflict. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 15(2):87–96. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
95.
Paton E. Gulf War: After Effects and Legal Consequences. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 15(2). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
96.
Tignino M. The Legal Regime of Natural Resources in Times of Armed Conflict and its Weaknesses. The transformation of international environmental law. Oxford: Hart; 2011. p. 193–207.
97.
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports [Internet]. International Court of Justice; 2005. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/116/10455.pdf
98.
Energy Charter Treaty [Internet]. Energy Charter Secretariat; 2004. Available from: http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf
99.
Roberts A. What is a Military Occupation? British yearbook of international law [Internet]. 1984;55(1):249–305. Available from: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/55/1.toc
100.
Langenkamp RD, Zedalis RJ. What Happens to the Iraqi Oil?: Thoughts on Some Significant, Unexamined International Legal Questions Regarding Occupation of Oil Fields. European Journal of International Law. 14(3):417–435.
101.
Symposium: The Impact on International Law of a Decade of Measures against Iraq. European Journal of International Law [Internet]. 13(1). Available from: http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/1.toc
102.
United Nations. Report of the UN Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources of the Democratic Republic of the Congo [Internet]. Available from: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N03/567/36/IMG/N0356736.pdf?OpenElement
103.
Michael W. Lewis. The Law of Aerial Bombardment in the 1991 Gulf War. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 97(3):481–509. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3109837?origin=crossref
104.
Okowa P. Congo’s War: The Legal Dimension of a Protracted Conflict. British yearbook of international law [Internet]. 2006;77(1):203–255. Available from: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/77/1.toc
105.
Akande D, Williams S. International Adjudication on National Security Issues: What Role for the WTO. Virginia journal of international law [Internet]. University of Virginia School of Law; 43(2):365–404. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvajint&collection=journals
106.
Chinkin CM. Crisis and the Performance of International Agreements: The Outbreak of War in Perspective. Yale Journal of World Public Order [Internet]. Yale Law School; 7(2):177–208. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fyjil&collection=journals
107.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. v. Republic of Sri Lanka, Final Award [Internet]. Investment Treaty Arbitration; 27AD. Available from: http://www.italaw.com/cases/documents/199
108.
Redgwell C. International Regulation of Energy Activities. Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 51–68.
109.
Higgins R. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1994.
110.
Rainer Lagoni. Interim Measures Pending Maritime Delimitation Agreements. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 78(2):345–368. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2202280
111.
Peter D. Cameron. The Rules of Engagement: Developing Cross-Border Petroleum Deposits in the North Sea and the Caribbean. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 55(3):559–585. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4092640
112.
David M. Ong. Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: ‘Mere’ State Practice or Customary International Law? The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 93(4):771–804. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555344
113.
D. Bowett. Jurisdiction: Changing patterns of authority over activities and resources. British yearbook of international law [Internet]. 1982;53(1):771–804. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2555344?origin=crossref
114.
Esmaeili H. The legal regime of offshore oil rigs in international law. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2001.
115.
Gao Z. Environmental regulation of oil and gas. London: Kluwer Law International; 1998.
116.
Maria Gavouneli. Pollution from offshore installations. London: Graham & Trotman/M. Nijhoff; 1995.
117.
Roggenkamp MM. Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
118.
Bantekas I. Hellenic (Greek) Petroleum Law: Regulation of Exploration and Exploitation. Journal of energy & natural resources law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 20(2):117–129. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
119.
Roggenkamp MM. Petroleum Pipelines in the North Sea: Questions of Jurisdiction and Practical Status. Journal of energy & natural resources law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 16(1):92–109. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
120.
United Nations. UN Convention on the law of the sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
121.
International Maritime Organization. IMO Guidelines and Standards for the Removal of Offshore Installations and Structures on the Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive Economic Zone [Internet]. 1989. Available from: http://www.imo.org/blast/mainframe.asp?topic_id=1026
122.
United Nations. Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf [Internet]. 1958. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/MTDSG/Volume%20II/Chapter%20XXI/XXI-4.en.pdf
123.
Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (‘OSPAR Convention’) [Internet]. OSPAR; 1992. Available from: http://www.ospar.org/html_documents/ospar/html/ospar_convention_e_updated_text_2007.pdf
124.
International Maritime Organization. Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Environment/LCLP/Documents/LC1972.pdf
125.
Redgwell C. International Regulation of Energy Activities. Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 51–68.
126.
Kirk EA, Warbrick C, McGoldrick D. Ospar Decision 98/3 and the Dumping of Offshore Installations. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 48(2):458–464. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/761384
127.
Mankabady S. Decommissioning of Offshore Installations. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce [Internet]. 28(4). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=603&handle=hein.journals%2Fjmlc28&collection=journals
128.
Ayoade MA. Disused offshore installations and pipelines: towards ‘sustainable decommissioning’. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2002.
129.
Gao Z. Environmental regulation of oil and gas. London: Kluwer Law International; 1998.
130.
Higgins R. Abandonment of Energy Sites and Facilities: Relevant International Law. Journal of energy & natural resources law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 11(1):6–16. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
131.
Roggenkamp MM. Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
132.
Daintith T, Willoughby G. Manual of United Kingdom oil and gas law. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1984.
133.
Hecht SB. California’s New Rigs-to-Reefs Law [Internet]. UCLA Institute of the Environment and Sustainability (2010); Available from: http://www.environment.ucla.edu/reportcard/article9389.html
134.
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department. Rigs-to-Reefs [Internet]. Available from: http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/landwater/water/habitats/artificial_reef/rigs-to-reefs.phtml
135.
Kaiser MJ, Pulsipher AG. Rigs-to-Reef Programs in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Development & International Law. 36(2):119–134.
136.
European Wind Energy Association. The European offshore wind industry - key trends and statistics 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/statistics/European_offshore_statistics_2012.pdf
137.
International Renewable Energy Agency. Statute of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.irena.org/documents/uploadDocuments/Statute/IRENA_FC_Statute_signed_in_Bonn_26_01_2009_incl_declaration_on_further_authentic_versions.pdf
138.
Convention of Migratory Species of Wild Animals. Bonn Convention on Migratory Species, Resolution 7.5 - ‘Wind Turbines and Migratory Species’ [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/document/RES_7_05_Wind_Turbine_0_0.pdf
139.
OSPAR. OSPAR Guidance on Environmental Considerations for Offshore Wind Farm Development (Reference number: 2008-3) [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.ospar.org/v_measures/browse.asp?menu=00750302120125_000002_000000
140.
Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
141.
UK Energy Act 2004 [Internet]. Office of Public Sector Information; 2004. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/20/contents
142.
Scott KN. Tilting at Offshore Windmills: Regulating Wind Farm Development Within the Renewable Energy Zone. Journal of Environmental Law. 18(1):89–118.
143.
Zedalis RJ. International energy law: rules governing future exploration, exploitation and use of renewable resources. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2000.
144.
European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC [Internet]. 23AD. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009L0028
145.
The British Wind Energy Association [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ewea.org/
146.
United Nations. Resolutions from the UN Commission on Sustainable Development [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/k-001303.htm
147.
UN Energy website [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un-energy.org/
148.
IRENA home page [Internet]. Available from: http://www.irena.org/home/index.aspx?PriMenuID=12&mnu=Pri
149.
Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
150.
UN Economic Commission for Europe. (1) The 1991 Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context and 2003 Kiev Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment. UN Economic Commission for Europe; 1991.
151.
UN Economic Commission for Europe. Decision III/8: Guidance on public participation in environmental assessment in a transboundary context [Internet]. UN Economic Commission for Europe; Available from: http://www.unece.org/env/eia/pubs/publicpart_guidance.html
152.
World Bank. (2) Environmental Assessment and the World Bank - OP/BD 4.01 Environmental Impact Assessment [Internet]. Available from: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/ENVIRONMENT/EXTENVASS/0,,menuPK:407994~pagePK:149018~piPK:149093~theSitePK:407988,00.html
153.
World Bank. Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update 10: International Agreements on Environment and Natural Resources: Relevance and Application in Environmental Assessment [Internet]. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSAFEPOL/1142947-1116497123103/20507399/Update10InternationalAgreementsOnEnvironmentAndNaturalResourcesMarch1996.pdf
154.
OSPAR Commission. (3) Environmental Assessment under the OSPAR Convention and Annex IV [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ospar.org/content/content.asp?menu=00340108070000_000000_000000
155.
Permanent Court of Arbitration. Ireland v. United Kingdom (OSPAR Arbitration) [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1158
156.
Ted L. McDorman. Access to Information under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention (Ireland v. United Kingdom). The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 98(2):330–339. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3176735
157.
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (‘Aarhus Convention’) 2161 UNTS 447 [Internet]. Aarhus, Denmark: UN Economic Commission for Europe; 25AD. Available from: http://www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.html
158.
Economic Community of West African States - Court of Justice. SERAP v. Nigeria [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.courtecowas.org/site2012/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=177:case-serap-v-federal-republic-of-nigeria&catid=10:judgements&Itemid=86
159.
African Commission for Human Rights. The Social and Economic Rights Action Center and the Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria, No. 155/96 [Internet]. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library; 2001. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/africa/comcases/155-96.html
160.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Saramaka People v. Suriname [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_172_ing.pdf
161.
United Nations. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, UNGA 61/295 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
162.
United Nations. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, General Recommendation No. 23 on Indigenous Peoples [Internet]. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library; 1997. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/genrexxiii.htm
163.
Triggs G. The Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Participate in Resource Development: An International Legal Perspective. Human rights in natural resource development: public participation in the sustainable development of mining and energy resources. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 145–154.
164.
Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
165.
Boer B. World Heritage Disputes in Australia. Journal of environmental law and litigation [Internet]. University of Oregon School of Law; 1992;7:247–279. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenvll&collection=journals
166.
Ben Boer, Graeme Wiffen. Heritage Law in Australia. Oxford University Press, USA; 2006.
167.
Waters CPM. *Who Should Regulate the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review [Internet]. 2004;16(3):403–420. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gintenlr16&id=413&collection=journals&index=journals/gintenlr#413
168.
Redgwell C. *Contractual and Treaty Arrangements Supporting Large European Transboundary Pipeline Projects: Can Adequate Human Rights and Environmental Protection Be Secured? Energy networks and the law: innovative solutions in changing markets [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 104–110. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645039.001.0001
169.
Brookings Institution. *Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Pipeline Project Roundtable [Internet]. 4AD. Available from: http://www.brookings.edu/events/2003/03/04russia
170.
*Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Project Website [Internet]. BP; Available from: http://www.bp.com/en_az/caspian/aboutus/legalagreements.html
171.
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Company. *BTC Human Rights Undertaking [Internet]. BP; 22AD. Available from: http://subsites.bp.com/caspian/Human%20Rights%20Undertaking.pdf
172.
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Company. Joint Statement on the BTC Pipeline Project [Internet]. BP; 16AD. Available from: http://subsites.bp.com/caspian/Joint%20Statement.pdf
173.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Foreign and Commonwealth Office Country Profiles [Internet]. Available from: http://data.gov.uk/publisher/foreign-and-commonwealth-office
174.
Nick M. Rethinking Multinational Corporate Governance in Extractive Industries: The Caspian Development Project and the Promise of Cooperative Governance. Vanderbilt journal of transnational law [Internet]. Vanderbilt University Law School; 38(2):577–614. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvantl&collection=journals
175.
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Project Website [Internet]. BP; Available from: http://www.bp.com/en_az/caspian/aboutus/legalagreements.html
176.
The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline – a briefing for BP staff [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bakuceyhan.org.uk/correspondence/
177.
Tran M. The Guardian, Q&A: The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline [Internet]. The Guardian; 26AD. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2005/may/26/businessqandas.oilandpetrol
178.
Amnesty International. Human rights on the line: The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline project [Internet]. Amnesty International; Available from: http://www.amnesty.org.uk/resources/human-rights-line
179.
Martin CH. Comparative Human Rights Jurisprudence in Azerbaijan: Theory, Practice and Prospects. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy [Internet]. Florida State University College of Law; 14(2):215–251. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjtrnlwp&collection=journals
180.
Muchlinski P. Environmental Issues. Multinational enterprises and the law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
181.
Andrew Clapham. Corporations and Human Rights. Human rights obligations of non-state actors [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14975849970004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
182.
OECD. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 1976 (fifth and last update) [Internet]. 25AD. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/oecdguidelinesformultinationalenterprises.htm
183.
Murphy SD. Taking Multinational Corporate Codes of Conduct to the Next Level. Columbia journal of transnational law [Internet]. 2005;43(2). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Contents?handle=hein.journals/cjtl43&id=1&size=2&index=&collection=journals
184.
Lindsay R, et al. Human rights responsibilities in the oil and gas sector: applying the UN Guiding Principles. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business. 6(1):2–66.
185.
Ong DM. The Impact of Environmental Law on Corporate Governance: International and Comparative Perspectives. European Journal of International Law. 12(4):685–726.
186.
Bradlow DD. Private Complaints and International Organizations: A Comparative Study of the Independent Inspection Mechanisms in International Financial Institutions. Georgetown Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2005;36(2):403–494. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Contents?handle=hein.journals/geojintl36&id=1&size=2&index=journals/geojintl&collection=journals
187.
Bekhechi MA. The Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project: Some Thoughts about the Legal Challenges and Lessons Learned from a World-Bank Financed Large Infrastructure Project. Energy networks and the law: innovative solutions in changing markets [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645039.001.0001
188.
World Bank. Accountability at the World Bank: The Inspection Panel 10 years on [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://ewebapps.worldbank.org/apps/ip/Pages/Publications.aspx#
189.
Shihata IFI. The World Bank inspection panel: in practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
190.
World Bank. World Bank Inspection Panel website [Internet]. Available from: http://ewebapps.worldbank.org/apps/ip/Pages/Home.aspx
191.
Darrow M. Between light and shadow: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and international human rights law. Oxford: Hart; 2003.
192.
Darrow M. The World Bank and Major Infrastructure Projects. Between light and shadow: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and international human rights law. Oxford: Hart; 2003. p. 72–74.
193.
Darrow M. Accountability and Evaluation. Between light and shadow: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and international human rights law. Oxford: Hart; 2003. p. 236–243.
194.
Duruigbo E. The World Bank, Multinational Oil Corporations, and the Resource Curse in Africa. University of Pennsylvania journal of international economic law [Internet]. 26(1):1–67. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Contents?handle=hein.journals/upjiel26&id=1&size=2&index=&collection=journals
195.
Freestone D. Incorporating Sustainable Development Concerns into the Development and Investment Process – the World Bank Experience. Exploitation of natural resources in the 21st century. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2003.
196.
Freestone D. The Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies of the World Bank and the Evolving Role of the Inspection Panel. Economic globalization and compliance with international environmental agreements. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2003.
197.
Gowlland Gualtieri A. The Environmental Accountability of the World Bank to Non-State Actors: Insights from the Inspection Panel. British yearbook of international law [Internet]. 2001;72(1). Available from: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/72/1.toc
198.
Rigo Sureda A. Process Integrity and Institutional Independence in International Organizations: The Inspection Panel and the Sanctions Committee of the World Bank. International organizations and international dispute settlement: trends and prospects. Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers; 2002.
199.
Maurizio Ragazzi. Legal Opinion of the Senior Vice President and General Counsel: Role of the Inspection Panel in the Preliminary Assessment of Whether to Recommend Inspection. International Legal Materials [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 34(2):503–534. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20698435?seq=1
200.
International Law Commission. ILC Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations (DARIO) [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/9_11.htm
201.
Redgwell C. International Energy Security. Energy security : managing risk in a dynamic legal and regulatory environment [Internet]. Oxford; 2004. p. 17–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271610.001.0001
202.
Pritchard R. The complication that climate change poses for Asia-Pacific energy security. International energy law and taxation review [Internet]. 2007;1:18–21. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I649229B0A1D811DBB231B2E2CD0A37DC/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
203.
Robert Pritchard. Global energy security and Middle East oil. International Energy Law & Taxation Review [Internet]. Publishers’ telephone no: 0845 600 9355: Sweet & Maxwell; 2006;13–19. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IC1F0ED20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
204.
United Nations. International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages (New York, 17 December 1979, EIF on 3 June 1983) 1316 UNTS 205 [Internet]. 17AD. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-5&chapter=18&lang=en
205.
United Nations. International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (done on 13 April 2005, EIF on 7 July 2007) 2445 UNTS 89 [Internet]. 13AD. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?&src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII~15&chapter=18&Temp=mtdsg3&lang=en
206.
International Maritime Organization. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation [Internet]. International Maritime Organization; 10AD. Available from: http://www.imo.org/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/SUA-Treaties.aspx
207.
International Maritime Organization. Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms located on the Continental Shelf [Internet]. International Maritime Organization; 10AD. Available from: http://www.imo.org/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/SUA-Treaties.aspx
208.
Scott R. The International Energy Agency: Beyond the First 20 Years. Journal of energy & natural resources law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 13(4):239–257. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
209.
Willrich M, Conant MA. The International Energy Agency: An Interpretation and Assessment. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 71(2):199–223. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2199526?origin=crossref
