1.
Bradbrook, A.: Energy Law as an Academic Discipline. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law. 14, 193–217.
2.
Redgwell, C.: International Regulation of Energy Activities. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. pp. 18–23. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
3.
Redgwell, C.: International Regulation of Energy Activities. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. pp. 18–23. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
4.
Krieger, H., de Boer, C., Steeg, H.: International Organizations and their Activities in the Energy Sector. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. pp. 97–169. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).
5.
Shaw, M.N.: Sources. In: International law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).
6.
Harris, D.J.: Cases and materials on international law. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2010).
7.
Brownlie, I.: Principles of public international law. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1990).
8.
Higgins, R.: Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1994).
9.
Thirlway, H.: The Sources of International Law. In: International law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
10.
Redgwell, C.: International Regulation of Energy Activities. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. pp. 23–40. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).
11.
Hickey, J.E.: International Law. In: Energy law and policy for the 21st century. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, Denver, Colo (2000).
12.
Redgwell, C.: International Soft Law and Globalisation. In: Regulating energy and natural resources. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
13.
Wood, M.: What Is Public International Law? The Need for Clarity about Sources. Asian Journal of International Law. 1, 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251311000014.
14.
Cassese, A.: International law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
15.
Boyle, A.E., Chinkin, C.M.: The making of international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
16.
Wood, M.: First report on formation and evidence of customary international law, A/CN.4/663, http://legal.un.org/ilc/sessions/65/jourchr.htm, (17)AD.
17.
United Nations: General Assembly Resolution 1803 Declaration on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources 1962, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/resources.pdf, (1962).
18.
United Nations: General Assembly Resolution 3201, Declaration on the Establishment of a the New International Economic Order, http://www.un-documents.net/s6r3201.htm, (1974).
19.
United Nations: General Assembly Resolution 3281, Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm, (1974).
20.
London School of Economics & Political Science: Texaco v Libya; BP v. Libya. International law reports. (1977).
21.
Birnie, P.W., Boyle, A.E., Redgwell, C.: International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
22.
Birnie, P.W., Boyle, A.E., Redgwell, C.: International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
23.
A.V. Lowe: Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments. In: International Law and Sustainable Development. pp. 19–37. Oxford University Press (1999).
24.
Schrijver, N.: Sovereignty over natural resources: balancing rights and duties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
25.
Brownlie, I.: Legal Status of Natural Resources in International Law: Some Aspects. Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de Droit International. 162, 253–310 (1979).
26.
Sands, P.: International Law in the Field of Sustainable Development. British Yearbook of International Law. 65, 303–381 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/65.1.303.
27.
Schrijver, N.: Sovereignty over natural resources: balancing rights and duties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
28.
Nico Schrijver: The evolution of sustainable development in international law. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden (2008).
29.
Bradbrook, A.J., Wahnschafft, R.D.: A Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on Sustainable Energy Production and Consumption. Journal of  Energy & Natural  Resources Law. 19, 143–163.
30.
French, D.: International law and policy of sustainable development. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2005).
31.
Hosena, K., Chowdhury, S.R.: Permanent sovereignty over natural resources in international law: principle and practice. Pinter, London (1984).
32.
Crawford, James, Brownlie, Ian: Brownlie’s principles of public international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
33.
Redgwell, C.: International Regulation of Energy Activities. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).
34.
Higgins, R.: Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1994).
35.
Evans, M.D.: International law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
36.
The American Journal of International Law. 96,.
37.
Crawford, J., Brownlie, I.: Brownlie’s principles of public international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
38.
Evans, M.D.: International law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
39.
Evans, M.D., Capps, P.: International law. Ashgate Pub. Limited, Farnham (2009).
40.
Collier, J.G., Lowe, A.V.: The settlement of disputes in international law: institutions and procedures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999).
41.
Higgins, R.: Natural Resources in the Case Law of the International Court. In: International law and sustainable development : past achievements and future challenges. pp. 87–112. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1999).
42.
Birnie, P.W., Boyle, A.E., Redgwell, C.: International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
43.
Sachariew, K.: Promoting Compliance with International Environmental Legal Standards: Reflections on Monitoring and Reporting Mechanisms. Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 2, 31–52 (1992).
44.
Evans, M.D., Capps, P.: International law. Ashgate Pub. Limited, Farnham (2009).
45.
Crawford, J., Brownlie, I.: Brownlie’s principles of public international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
46.
Chorzow Factory Case (Indemnity) PCIJ Series A, No. 17. International Court of Justice (13)AD.
47.
Mexico--United States: Expropriation by Mexico of Agrarian Properties Owned by American Citizens (Hull formula). The American Journal of International Law. 32, 181–207.
48.
United Nations: General Assembly Resolution 1803 Declaration on Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources 1962, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/resources.pdf, (1962).
49.
United Nations: General Assembly Resolution 3281, Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm, (1974).
50.
American-Mexican Claims Commission: North American Dredging Company of Texas (U.S.A.) v. United Mexican States - 4 RIAA 26, http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_IV/26-35.pdf, (1926).
51.
Patrick M. Norton: A Law of the Future or a Law of the Past? Modern Tribunals and the International Law of Expropriation. The American Journal of International Law. 85, 474–505.
52.
Waelde, T., Kolo, A.: Environmental Regulation, Investment Protection and ‘Regulatory Taking’ in International Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 50, 811–848.
53.
Lowenfeld, A.F.: The Responsibility of Host States to Foreign Investors: Customary International Law. In: International economic law. pp. 467–494. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
54.
Lowenfeld, A.F.: Dispute Settlement and International Investment. In: International economic law. pp. 495–534. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
55.
Muchlinski, P.: Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
56.
Higgins, R.: The Taking of Property by the State: Recent Developments in International Law. Recueil des cours de l’Académie de Droit International. 176, (1982).
57.
Akinsanya, A.A.: The expropriation of multinational property in the Third World. Praeger, New York, N.Y. (1980).
58.
Brewer, T.L., Young, S.: The multilateral investment system and multinational enterprises. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998).
59.
Hosena, K., Chowdhury, S.R.: Permanent sovereignty over natural resources in international law: principle and practice. Pinter, London (1984).
60.
Mouri, A.: The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-U.S. claims tribunal. M. Nijhoff, Dordrecht (1994).
61.
Sornarajah, M.: The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
62.
Sornarajah, M.: The settlement of foreign investment disputes. Kluwer Law International, The Hague (2000).
63.
Cameron, P.D., Schwebel, S.M.: International energy investment law: the pursuit of stability. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199545230.001.0001.
64.
Bamberger, C., Waelde, T.: The Energy Charter Treaty. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU and international law and institutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).
65.
Waern, K.P.: Transit Provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty and the Energy Charter Protocol on Transit. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law. 20, 172–191.
66.
Azaria, D.: Energy Transit under the Energy Charter Treaty and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law. 27, 559–596.
67.
Ehring, L., Selivanova, Y.: Energy Transit. In: Regulation of energy in international trade law: WTO, NAFTA, and Energy Charter. pp. 49–104. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands (2012).
68.
Fatouros, A.: An International Legal Framework for Energy. Recueil des cours de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye: Collected courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. 355–446 (2008).
69.
Layard, A.: The European Energy Charter Treaty: Tipping the Balance between Energy and Environment. European Environmental Law Review. 4, 150–156 (1995).
70.
Pascal Laffont: An Energy Charter protocol on transit. International Energy Law & Taxation Review. 8, 239–249 (2003).
71.
Papioannou, A.: Security of Energy Supply: the Approach in the European Union and the Contribution of the Energy Charter Treaty. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. 2, 34–62 (1995).
72.
Waelde, T.: Sustainable Development and the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty. In: International economic law with a human face. Kluwer Law International, The Hague [etc.] (1998).
73.
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/gatt47_e.pdf.
74.
Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes - Annex 2, http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/28-dsu.pdf, (1994).
75.
Palmeter, N.D., Mavroidis, P.C.: Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization: practice and procedure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
76.
Waelde, T., Gunst, A.: International Energy Trade and Access to Energy Networks. In: Energy and Environmental Services: Negotiating Objectives and Development Priorities - UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/2003/3. pp. 118–163 (2003).
77.
Appellate Body Report, US - Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm#results.
78.
Appellate Body Report, China — Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials, WT/DS394/AB/R, WT/DS395/AB/R, WT/DS398/AB/R, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/find_dispu_cases_e.htm#results.
79.
Desta, M.G.: OPEC, the WTO and Regional Trading Agreements. Journal of World Trade. 37, 523–551.
80.
Karapinar, B.: Defining the Legal Boundaries of Export Restrictions: A Case Law Analysis. Journal of International Economic Law. 15, 443–479 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgs021.
81.
World Trade Organization: World Trade Report 2010 – Trade in Natural Resources, http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/world_trade_report10_e.pdf, (2010).
82.
Desta, M.G.: The GATT/WTO system and international trade in petroleum. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law. 21, 385–398.
83.
Zarrilli, S.: The Doha Work Programme: possible impact on energy trade and on domestic policies in energy-producing developing countries. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law. 21, 399–412.
84.
Frasl, I.: The trade rules of GATT and related instruments and the Energy Charter Treaty. In: Energy Charter Treaty: selected topics. University of Dundee, Centre for Petroleum and Mineral Law and Policy, Dundee (1995).
85.
Evans, P.C.: Strengthening WTO member commitments in energy services: problems and prospects. In: Domestic regulation and service trade liberalization. pp. 167–189. Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press, Washington, DC (2003).
86.
Zarrilli, S.: Domestic Taxation of Energy Products and Multilateral Trade Rules: Is This a Case of Unlawful Discrimination? Journal of World Trade. 37, 359–394.
87.
United Nations: U.N. Charter, https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf, (1945).
88.
United Nations: U.N. Charter, https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf, (1945).
89.
International Court of Justice Reports: Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), Merits, Judgment, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=367&p1=3&p2=3&case=70&p3=5.
90.
International Committee of the Red Cross: Geneva Conventions 1949, https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/365?OpenDocument.
91.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia: Prosecutor v Tadić (Appeals Chamber, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction) ICTY-94-1, http://www.icty.org/x/cases/tadic/acdec/en/51002.htm.
92.
Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America) (Preliminary Objection) ICJ Rep. 847, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=468&code=op&p1=3&p2=3&case=90&k=0a&p3=5.
93.
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Advisory Opinion, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/95/7495.pdf, (8)AD.
94.
Gardam, J.: Energy and the Law of Armed Conflict. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law. 15, 87–96.
95.
Paton, E.: Gulf War: After Effects and Legal Consequences. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law. 15,.
96.
Tignino, M.: The Legal Regime of Natural Resources in Times of Armed Conflict and its Weaknesses. In: The transformation of international environmental law. pp. 193–207. Hart, Oxford (2011).
97.
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), ICJ Reports, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/116/10455.pdf, (2005).
98.
Energy Charter Treaty, http://www.encharter.org/fileadmin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf, (2004).
99.
Roberts, A.: What is a Military Occupation? British yearbook of international law. 55, 249–305 (1984).
100.
Langenkamp, R.D., Zedalis, R.J.: What Happens to the Iraqi Oil?: Thoughts on Some Significant, Unexamined International Legal Questions Regarding Occupation of Oil Fields. European Journal of International Law. 14, 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/14.3.417.
101.
Symposium: The Impact on International Law of a Decade of Measures against Iraq. European Journal of International Law. 13,.
102.
United Nations: Report of the UN Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N03/567/36/IMG/N0356736.pdf?OpenElement.
103.
Michael W. Lewis: The Law of Aerial Bombardment in the 1991 Gulf War. The American Journal of International Law. 97, 481–509.
104.
Okowa, P.: Congo’s War: The Legal Dimension of a Protracted Conflict. British yearbook of international law. 77, 203–255 (2006).
105.
Akande, D., Williams, S.: International Adjudication on National Security Issues: What Role for the WTO. Virginia journal of international law. 43, 365–404.
106.
Chinkin, C.M.: Crisis and the Performance of International Agreements: The Outbreak of War in Perspective. Yale Journal of World Public Order. 7, 177–208.
107.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd. v. Republic of Sri Lanka, Final Award, http://www.italaw.com/cases/documents/199.
108.
Redgwell, C.: International Regulation of Energy Activities. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. pp. 51–68. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
109.
Higgins, R.: Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1994).
110.
Rainer Lagoni: Interim Measures Pending Maritime Delimitation Agreements. The American Journal of International Law. 78, 345–368.
111.
Peter D. Cameron: The Rules of Engagement: Developing Cross-Border Petroleum Deposits in the North Sea and the Caribbean. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 55, 559–585.
112.
David M. Ong: Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: ‘Mere’ State Practice or Customary International Law? The American Journal of International Law. 93, 771–804.
113.
D. Bowett: Jurisdiction: Changing patterns of authority over activities and resources. British yearbook of international law. 53, 771–804 (1982).
114.
Esmaeili, H.: The legal regime of offshore oil rigs in international law. Ashgate, Aldershot (2001).
115.
Gao, Z.: Environmental regulation of oil and gas. Kluwer Law International, London (1998).
116.
Maria Gavouneli: Pollution from offshore installations. Graham & Trotman/M. Nijhoff, London (1995).
117.
Roggenkamp, M.M.: Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
118.
Bantekas, I.: Hellenic (Greek) Petroleum Law: Regulation of Exploration and Exploitation. Journal of energy & natural resources law. 20, 117–129.
119.
Roggenkamp, M.M.: Petroleum Pipelines in the North Sea: Questions of Jurisdiction and Practical Status. Journal of energy & natural resources law. 16, 92–109.
120.
United Nations: UN Convention on the law of the sea 1982, http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm.
121.
International Maritime Organization: IMO Guidelines and Standards for the Removal of Offshore Installations and Structures on the Continental Shelf and in the Exclusive Economic Zone, http://www.imo.org/blast/mainframe.asp?topic_id=1026.
122.
United Nations: Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/MTDSG/Volume%20II/Chapter%20XXI/XXI-4.en.pdf, (1958).
123.
Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (‘OSPAR Convention’), http://www.ospar.org/html_documents/ospar/html/ospar_convention_e_updated_text_2007.pdf, (1992).
124.
International Maritime Organization: Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Environment/LCLP/Documents/LC1972.pdf, (2006).
125.
Redgwell, C.: International Regulation of Energy Activities. In: Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. pp. 51–68. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
126.
Kirk, E.A., Warbrick, C., McGoldrick, D.: Ospar Decision 98/3 and the Dumping of Offshore Installations. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 48, 458–464.
127.
Mankabady, S.: Decommissioning of Offshore Installations. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce. 28,.
128.
Ayoade, M.A.: Disused offshore installations and pipelines: towards ‘sustainable decommissioning’. Kluwer Law International, The Hague (2002).
129.
Gao, Z.: Environmental regulation of oil and gas. Kluwer Law International, London (1998).
130.
Higgins, R.: Abandonment of Energy Sites and Facilities: Relevant International Law. Journal of energy & natural resources law. 11, 6–16.
131.
Roggenkamp, M.M.: Energy law in Europe: national, EU, and international regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
132.
Daintith, T., Willoughby, G.: Manual of United Kingdom oil and gas law. Sweet & Maxwell, London (1984).
133.
Hecht, S.B.: California’s New Rigs-to-Reefs Law, http://www.environment.ucla.edu/reportcard/article9389.html.
134.
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department: Rigs-to-Reefs, http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/landwater/water/habitats/artificial_reef/rigs-to-reefs.phtml.
135.
Kaiser, M.J., Pulsipher, A.G.: Rigs-to-Reef Programs in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Development & International Law. 36, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320590943990.
136.
European Wind Energy Association: The European offshore wind industry - key trends and statistics 2012, http://www.ewea.org/fileadmin/files/library/publications/statistics/European_offshore_statistics_2012.pdf.
137.
International Renewable Energy Agency: Statute of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), http://www.irena.org/documents/uploadDocuments/Statute/IRENA_FC_Statute_signed_in_Bonn_26_01_2009_incl_declaration_on_further_authentic_versions.pdf, (2009).
138.
Convention of Migratory Species of Wild Animals: Bonn Convention on Migratory Species, Resolution 7.5 - ‘Wind Turbines and Migratory Species’, http://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/document/RES_7_05_Wind_Turbine_0_0.pdf, (2002).
139.
OSPAR: OSPAR Guidance on Environmental Considerations for Offshore Wind Farm Development (Reference number: 2008-3), http://www.ospar.org/v_measures/browse.asp?menu=00750302120125_000002_000000.
140.
Birnie, P.W., Boyle, A.E., Redgwell, C.: International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
141.
UK Energy Act 2004, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/20/contents.
142.
Scott, K.N.: Tilting at Offshore Windmills: Regulating Wind Farm Development Within the Renewable Energy Zone. Journal of Environmental Law. 18, 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqi047.
143.
Zedalis, R.J.: International energy law: rules governing future exploration, exploitation and use of renewable resources. Ashgate, Aldershot (2000).
144.
European Union: Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32009L0028.
145.
The British Wind Energy Association, http://www.ewea.org/.
146.
United Nations: Resolutions from the UN Commission on Sustainable Development, http://www.un-documents.net/k-001303.htm.
147.
UN Energy website, http://www.un-energy.org/.
148.
IRENA home page, http://www.irena.org/home/index.aspx?PriMenuID=12&mnu=Pri.
149.
Birnie, P.W., Boyle, A.E., Redgwell, C.: International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
150.
UN Economic Commission for Europe: (1) The 1991 Espoo Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context and 2003 Kiev Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment.
151.
UN Economic Commission for Europe: Decision III/8: Guidance on public participation in environmental assessment in a transboundary context, http://www.unece.org/env/eia/pubs/publicpart_guidance.html.
152.
World Bank: (2) Environmental Assessment and the World Bank - OP/BD 4.01 Environmental Impact Assessment, http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/ENVIRONMENT/EXTENVASS/0,,menuPK:407994~pagePK:149018~piPK:149093~theSitePK:407988,00.html.
153.
World Bank: Environmental Assessment Sourcebook Update 10: International Agreements on Environment and Natural Resources: Relevance and Application in Environmental Assessment, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTSAFEPOL/1142947-1116497123103/20507399/Update10InternationalAgreementsOnEnvironmentAndNaturalResourcesMarch1996.pdf.
154.
OSPAR Commission: (3) Environmental Assessment under the OSPAR Convention and Annex IV, http://www.ospar.org/content/content.asp?menu=00340108070000_000000_000000.
155.
Permanent Court of Arbitration: Ireland v. United Kingdom (OSPAR Arbitration), http://pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1158.
156.
Ted L. McDorman: Access to Information under Article 9 of the OSPAR Convention (Ireland v. United Kingdom). The American Journal of International Law. 98, 330–339.
157.
Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (‘Aarhus Convention’) 2161 UNTS 447, http://www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.html.
158.
Economic Community of West African States - Court of Justice: SERAP v. Nigeria, http://www.courtecowas.org/site2012/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=177:case-serap-v-federal-republic-of-nigeria&catid=10:judgements&Itemid=86.
159.
African Commission for Human Rights: The Social and Economic Rights Action Center and the Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria, No. 155/96, http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/africa/comcases/155-96.html.
160.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Saramaka People v. Suriname, http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_172_ing.pdf.
161.
United Nations: United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, UNGA 61/295, http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf, (2007).
162.
United Nations: Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, General Recommendation No. 23 on Indigenous Peoples, http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/genrexxiii.htm.
163.
Triggs, G.: The Rights of Indigenous Peoples to Participate in Resource Development: An International Legal Perspective. In: Human rights in natural resource development: public participation in the sustainable development of mining and energy resources. pp. 145–154. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002).
164.
Birnie, P.W., Boyle, A.E., Redgwell, C.: International law and the environment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
165.
Boer, B.: World Heritage Disputes in Australia. Journal of environmental law and litigation. 7, 247–279 (1992).
166.
Ben Boer, Graeme Wiffen: Heritage Law in Australia. Oxford University Press, USA (2006).
167.
Waters, C.P.M.: *Who Should Regulate the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. 16, 403–420 (2004).
168.
Redgwell, C.: *Contractual and Treaty Arrangements Supporting Large European Transboundary Pipeline Projects: Can Adequate Human Rights and Environmental Protection Be Secured? In: Energy networks and the law: innovative solutions in changing markets. pp. 104–110. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
169.
Brookings Institution: *Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Pipeline Project Roundtable, http://www.brookings.edu/events/2003/03/04russia.
170.
*Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Project Website, http://www.bp.com/en_az/caspian/aboutus/legalagreements.html.
171.
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Company: *BTC Human Rights Undertaking, http://subsites.bp.com/caspian/Human%20Rights%20Undertaking.pdf, (22)AD.
172.
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Company: Joint Statement on the BTC Pipeline Project, http://subsites.bp.com/caspian/Joint%20Statement.pdf, (16)AD.
173.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Foreign and Commonwealth Office Country Profiles, http://data.gov.uk/publisher/foreign-and-commonwealth-office.
174.
Nick, M.: Rethinking Multinational Corporate Governance in Extractive Industries: The Caspian Development Project and the Promise of Cooperative Governance. Vanderbilt journal of transnational law. 38, 577–614.
175.
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Project Website, http://www.bp.com/en_az/caspian/aboutus/legalagreements.html.
176.
The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline – a briefing for BP staff, http://www.bakuceyhan.org.uk/correspondence/.
177.
Tran, M.: The Guardian, Q&A: The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline, http://www.theguardian.com/business/2005/may/26/businessqandas.oilandpetrol.
178.
Amnesty International: Human rights on the line: The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline project, http://www.amnesty.org.uk/resources/human-rights-line.
179.
Martin, C.H.: Comparative Human Rights Jurisprudence in Azerbaijan: Theory, Practice and Prospects. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy. 14, 215–251.
180.
Muchlinski, P.: Environmental Issues. In: Multinational enterprises and the law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
181.
Andrew Clapham: Corporations and Human Rights. In: Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
182.
OECD: OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 1976 (fifth and last update), http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/oecdguidelinesformultinationalenterprises.htm.
183.
Murphy, S.D.: Taking Multinational Corporate Codes of Conduct to the Next Level. Columbia journal of transnational law. 43, (2005).
184.
Lindsay, R., et al: Human rights responsibilities in the oil and gas sector: applying the UN Guiding Principles. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business. 6, 2–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jws033.
185.
Ong, D.M.: The Impact of Environmental Law on Corporate Governance: International and Comparative Perspectives. European Journal of International Law. 12, 685–726. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.4.685.
186.
Bradlow, D.D.: Private Complaints and International Organizations: A Comparative Study of the Independent Inspection Mechanisms in International Financial Institutions. Georgetown Journal of International Law. 36, 403–494 (2005).
187.
Bekhechi, M.A.: The Chad-Cameroon Pipeline Project: Some Thoughts about the Legal Challenges and Lessons Learned from a World-Bank Financed Large Infrastructure Project. In: Energy networks and the law: innovative solutions in changing markets. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
188.
World Bank: Accountability at the World Bank: The Inspection Panel 10 years on, http://ewebapps.worldbank.org/apps/ip/Pages/Publications.aspx#, (2003).
189.
Shihata, I.F.I.: The World Bank inspection panel: in practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000).
190.
World Bank: World Bank Inspection Panel website, http://ewebapps.worldbank.org/apps/ip/Pages/Home.aspx.
191.
Darrow, M.: Between light and shadow: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and international human rights law. Hart, Oxford (2003).
192.
Darrow, M.: The World Bank and Major Infrastructure Projects. In: Between light and shadow: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and international human rights law. pp. 72–74. Hart, Oxford (2003).
193.
Darrow, M.: Accountability and Evaluation. In: Between light and shadow: the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and international human rights law. pp. 236–243. Hart, Oxford (2003).
194.
Duruigbo, E.: The World Bank, Multinational Oil Corporations, and the Resource Curse in Africa. University of Pennsylvania journal of international economic law. 26, 1–67.
195.
Freestone, D.: Incorporating Sustainable Development Concerns into the Development and Investment Process – the World Bank Experience. In: Exploitation of natural resources in the 21st century. Kluwer Law International, The Hague (2003).
196.
Freestone, D.: The Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies of the World Bank and the Evolving Role of the Inspection Panel. In: Economic globalization and compliance with international environmental agreements. Kluwer Law International, The Hague (2003).
197.
Gowlland Gualtieri, A.: The Environmental Accountability of the World Bank to Non-State Actors: Insights from the Inspection Panel. British yearbook of international law. 72, (2001).
198.
Rigo Sureda, A.: Process Integrity and Institutional Independence in International Organizations: The Inspection Panel and the Sanctions Committee of the World Bank. In: International organizations and international dispute settlement: trends and prospects. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley, N.Y. (2002).
199.
Maurizio Ragazzi: Legal Opinion of the Senior Vice President and General Counsel: Role of the Inspection Panel in the Preliminary Assessment of Whether to Recommend Inspection. International Legal Materials. 34, 503–534.
200.
International Law Commission: ILC Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations (DARIO), http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/9_11.htm, (2011).
201.
Redgwell, C.: International Energy Security. In: Energy security : managing risk in a dynamic legal and regulatory environment. pp. 17–46. , Oxford (2004).
202.
Pritchard, R.: The complication that climate change poses for Asia-Pacific energy security. International energy law and taxation review. 1, 18–21 (2007).
203.
Robert Pritchard: Global energy security and Middle East oil. International Energy Law & Taxation Review. 13–19 (2006).
204.
United Nations: International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages (New York, 17 December 1979, EIF on 3 June 1983) 1316 UNTS 205, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-5&chapter=18&lang=en, (17)AD.
205.
United Nations: International Convention for the Suppression of Acts of Nuclear Terrorism (done on 13 April 2005, EIF on 7 July 2007) 2445 UNTS 89, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetailsIII.aspx?&src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII~15&chapter=18&Temp=mtdsg3&lang=en, (13)AD.
206.
International Maritime Organization: Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, http://www.imo.org/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/SUA-Treaties.aspx.
207.
International Maritime Organization: Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms located on the Continental Shelf, http://www.imo.org/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/SUA-Treaties.aspx.
208.
Scott, R.: The International Energy Agency: Beyond the First 20 Years. Journal of energy & natural resources law. 13, 239–257.
209.
Willrich, M., Conant, M.A.: The International Energy Agency: An Interpretation and Assessment. The American Journal of International Law. 71, 199–223.