[1]
Abrines-Jaume et al., N. 2014. A qualitative analysis of implementing shared decision making in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the United Kingdom: Stages and facilitators. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Advance online publication, (Sept. 2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104514547596.
[2]
Bullivant et al., J. 2015. Clinical audit: A guide for NHS Boards and partners. : Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and Good Governance Institute.
[3]
CAMHS Outcomes Research Consortium | Collaborating to improve quality through outcomes: http://www.corc.uk.net/.
[4]
Child Outcomes Research Consortium (CORC) 2014. CORC+ Annual report: Erinsborough. CORC.
[5]
Chorpita et al., B.F. 2011. Evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: An updated review of indicators of efficacy and effectiveness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 18, 2 (2011), 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2011.01247.x.
[6]
Cooper, M. Meeting the demand for evidence-based practice. Therapy Today. 22, 4, 10–16.
[7]
Edbrooke-Childs, J. et al. 2014. Using Patient Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Service Effectiveness (UPROMISE): Training clinicians to use outcome measures in child mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. Online publication, (Oct. 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0600-2.
[8]
Evans, C. et al. 1998. The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health. Evidence-Based Mental Health. 1, 3 (1998), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmh.1.3.70.
[9]
Fleming et al., I. 2014. Learning from a learning collaboration: The CORC approach to combining research, evaluation and practice in child mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. Online publication, (Sept. 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0592-y.
[10]
Gallo, K.P. and Barlow, D.H. 2012. Factors involved in clinician adoption and nonadoption of evidence-based interventions in mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 19, 1 (2012), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2012.01276.x.
[11]
Girard, A. et al. 2013. Knowledge translation and improving practices in neurological rehabilitation: managers’ viewpoint. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 19, 1 (2013), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01769.x.
[12]
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) and Department of Health 2012. IAPT 3 Year Report - The first million patients. November 2012. Department of Health.
[13]
Ivers et al., N. 2012. Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 6, Art. CD000259 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
[14]
Jones, M. and et al 2013. Current view tool: Completion guide. CAMHS Press.
[15]
de Jong et al., K. 2012. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research. 22, 4 (2012), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2012.673023.
[16]
Kam, S.-E. and Midgley, N. 2006. Exploring clinical judgement: How do child and adolescent mental health professionals decide whether a young person needs individual psychotherapy? Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 11, 1 (2006), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104506059122.
[17]
Kazdin, A.E. 2008. Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist. 63, 3 (2008), 146–159.
[18]
L. Bickman et aL 2011. Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: Results of a randomized trial. Psychiatric Services. 62, 12 (2011), 1423–1429. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.002052011.
[19]
Lambert, M.J. and Ogles, B.M. 2009. Using clinical significance in psychotherapy outcome research: The need for a common procedure and validity data. Psychotherapy Research. 19, 4–5 (2009), 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300902849483.
[20]
Liberati et al., A. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 339, jul21 1 (2009), b2700–b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700.
[21]
Lindhiem et al., O. 2014. Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 34, 6 (2014), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002.
[22]
M. J. Batty et al 2013. Implementing routine outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: from present to future practice. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 18, 2 (2013), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00658.x.
[23]
Mellor-Clark et al., J. 2014. Leading horses to water: Lessons from a decade of helping psychological therapy services use routine outcome measurement to improve practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. Online publication, (Sept. 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0587-8.
[24]
M.Wolpert et al 2012. Routine outcomes monitoring as part of children and young people’s Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (CYP IAPT) - improving care or unhelpful burden? Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 17, 3 (2012), 129–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2012.00676.x.
[25]
P. Moran et al 2012. What do parents and carers think about routine outcome measures and their use? A focus group study of CAMHS attenders. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 17, 1 (2012), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104510391859.
[26]
Rose, M. and Bezjak, A. 2009. Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research. 18, 1 (2009), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9436-0.
[27]
Scheinost et al., D. 2013. Orbitofrontal cortex neurofeedback produces lasting changes in contamination anxiety and resting-state connectivity. Translational Psychiatry. 3, 4 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2013.24.
[28]
Semmelroch et al, M. 2012. Retrospective audit of postictal generalized EEG suppression in telemetry. Epilepsia. 53, 2 (2012), e21–e24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03296.x.
[29]
Stacey et al., D. 2014. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1, Art. CD001431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
[30]
T. Ford et al 2009. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Added Value Scores: Evaluating effectiveness in child mental health interventions. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 194, 6 (2009), 552–558. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.052373.
[31]
Talking about talking therapies: Thinking and planning about how to make good and accessible talking therapies available to children and young people.: http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/silo/files/talking-about-talking-therapies.pdf.
[32]
Timulak, L. 2008. Randomized control trials. Research in psychotherapy and counselling. SAGE. 30–43.
[33]
Wachtel, P.L. 2010. Beyond ‘ESTs’: Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 27, (2010), 251–272.
[34]
Weisz et al., J.R. 2013. Performance of evidence-based youth psychotherapies compared with usual clinical care. JAMA Psychiatry. 70, 7 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1176.
[35]
Wolpert et al., M. 2006. Drawing on the evidence: Advice for mental health professionals working with children and adolescents. CAMHS Publications.
[36]
Wolpert, M. et al. 2014. A qualitative exploration of patient and clinician views on Patient Reported Outcome Measures in child mental health and diabetes services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. Online publication, (Sept. 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0586-9.
[37]
Wolpert, M. et al. 2013. Issues in evaluation of psychotherapies. Cognitive behaviour therapy for children and families. P.J. Graham and S. Reynolds, eds. Cambridge University Press. 34–47.