1.
Wolpert et al. M. Drawing on the evidence: Advice for mental health professionals working with children and adolescents [Internet]. 2nd rev. ed. London: CAMHS Publications; 2006. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ebpu/docs/publication_files/drawing_onthe_evidence
2.
Chorpita et al. BF. Evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: An updated review of indicators of efficacy and effectiveness. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2011;18(2):154–172.
3.
Kazdin AE. Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist [Internet]. 2008;63(3):146–159. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00000487-200804000-00001&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
4.
Girard A, Rochette A, Fillion B. Knowledge translation and improving practices in neurological rehabilitation: managers’ viewpoint. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2013;19(1):60–67.
5.
Gallo KP, Barlow DH. Factors involved in clinician adoption and nonadoption of evidence-based interventions in mental health. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2012;19(1):93–106.
6.
Timulak L. Randomized control trials. Research in psychotherapy and counselling [Internet]. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2008. p. 30–43. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3b67bef9-7b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
7.
Cooper M. Meeting the demand for evidence-based practice. Therapy Today [Internet]. 22(4):10–16. Available from: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/32220/
8.
Wolpert, M., Fugard, A. J. B., Deighton, J. Issues in evaluation of psychotherapies. In: Graham PJ, Reynolds S, editors. Cognitive behaviour therapy for children and families [Internet]. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 34–47. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0ccba9e2-7836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
9.
Weisz et al. JR. Performance of evidence-based youth psychotherapies compared with usual clinical care. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(7).
10.
Liberati et al. A. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339(jul21 1):b2700–b2700.
11.
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT), Department of Health. IAPT 3 Year Report - The first million patients. November 2012 [Internet]. Department of Health; 2012. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160302154833/http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/silo/files/iapt-3-year-report.pdf
12.
Bullivant et al. J. Clinical audit: A guide for NHS Boards and partners. [Internet]. London: : Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and Good Governance Institute.; 2015. Available from: https://www.hqip.org.uk/resources/clinical-audit-a-guide-for-nhs-boards-and-partners/
13.
Kam SE, Midgley N. Exploring clinical judgement: How do child and adolescent mental health professionals decide whether a young person needs individual psychotherapy? Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2006;11(1):27–44.
14.
Semmelroch et al M. Retrospective audit of postictal generalized EEG suppression in telemetry. Epilepsia. 2012;53(2):e21–e24.
15.
Edbrooke-Childs J, Wolpert M, Deighton J. Using Patient Reported Outcome Measures to Improve Service Effectiveness (UPROMISE): Training clinicians to use outcome measures in child mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2014 Oct 21;Online publication.
16.
L. Bickman et aL. Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: Results of a randomized trial. Psychiatric Services. 2011;62(12):1423–1429.
17.
de Jong et al. K. Understanding the differential impact of outcome monitoring: Therapist variables that moderate feedback effects in a randomized clinical trial. Psychotherapy Research. 2012;22(4):464–474.
18.
P. Moran et al. What do parents and carers think about routine outcome measures and their use? A focus group study of CAMHS attenders. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2012;17(1):65–79.
19.
Wolpert M, Curtis-Tyler K, Edbrooke-Childs J. A qualitative exploration of patient and clinician views on Patient Reported Outcome Measures in child mental health and diabetes services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2014 Sept 2;Online publication.
20.
Scheinost et al. D. Orbitofrontal cortex neurofeedback produces lasting changes in contamination anxiety and resting-state connectivity. Translational Psychiatry. 2013;3(4).
21.
Young Minds. Talking about talking therapies: Thinking and planning about how to make good and accessible talking therapies available to children and young people. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iapt.nhs.uk/silo/files/talking-about-talking-therapies.pdf
22.
Evans C, Margison F, Barkham M. The contribution of reliable and clinically significant change methods to evidence-based mental health. Evidence-Based Mental Health. 1998;1(3):70–72.
23.
T. Ford et al. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Added Value Scores: Evaluating effectiveness in child mental health interventions. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009;194(6):552–558.
24.
Child Outcomes Research Consortium (CORC). CORC+ Annual report: Erinsborough [Internet]. CORC; 2014. Available from: http://www.corc.uk.net/resources/downloads/
25.
Lambert MJ, Ogles BM. Using clinical significance in psychotherapy outcome research: The need for a common procedure and validity data. Psychotherapy Research. 2009;19(4–5):493–501.
26.
CAMHS Outcomes Research Consortium | Collaborating to improve quality through outcomes [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corc.uk.net/
27.
Fleming et al. I. Learning from a learning collaboration: The CORC approach to combining research, evaluation and practice in child mental health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2014 Sept 19;Online publication.
28.
M. J. Batty et al. Implementing routine outcome measures in child and adolescent mental health services: from present to future practice. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 2013;18(2):82–87.
29.
Jones M, et al. Current view tool: Completion guide [Internet]. London: CAMHS Press; 2013. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/ebpu/publications/professionals
30.
Mellor-Clark et al. J. Leading horses to water: Lessons from a decade of helping psychological therapy services use routine outcome measurement to improve practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2014 Sept 2;Online publication.
31.
Rose M, Bezjak A. Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Quality of Life Research. 2009;18(1):125–136.
32.
M.Wolpert et al. Routine outcomes monitoring as part of children and young people’s Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (CYP IAPT) - improving care or unhelpful burden? Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 2012;17(3):129–130.
33.
Abrines-Jaume et al. N. A qualitative analysis of implementing shared decision making in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the United Kingdom: Stages and facilitators. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2014 Sept 1;Advance online publication.
34.
Lindhiem et al. O. Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review. 2014;34(6):506–517.
35.
Stacey et al. D. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2014;(1, Art. CD001431). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
36.
Wachtel PL. Beyond ‘ESTs’: Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidence-based practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology. 2010;27:251–272.
37.
Ivers et al. N. Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2012;(6, Art. CD000259). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3
