Bibliography for LAWSG107: International Law of the Sea BETA

1

R.R. Churchill, A.V. Lowe. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

2

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

3

Evans M. The Law of the Sea. In: International law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. 651–86.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG107_68777.pdf

4

Harris DJ. Cases and materials on international law. 7th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2010.

5

R.R. Churchill, A.V. Lowe. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

6

International Maritime Organization. Focus on IMO - IMO 1948-1998, a process of change. http://www.imo.org/KnowledgeCentre/ReferencesAndArchives/FocusOnIMO%28Archives%29/Pages/default.aspx

7

D. H. Anderson. Legal Implications of the Entry into Force of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1995;44:313–26.http://www.jstor.org/stable/760753

8

James Harrison. Making the law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2011.

9

Donald Rothwell, Tim Stephens. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

10

Alan E. Boyle, C.M. Chinkin. The making of international law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.

11

D.P. O’Connell, I.A. Shearer. The International law of the sea: Vol. 1. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1982.

12

R.R. Churchill, A.V. Lowe. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

13

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

14

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

15

I. A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;35:320–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231

16

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

17

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

18

International Court of Justice. Corfu Channel Case, Judgement of 9 April 1949. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=cd&case=1&code=cc&p3=4

19

Rothwell DR. Innocent passage in the territorial sea: the UNCLOS regime and Asia Pacific state practice. In: Navigational rights and freedoms and the new law of the sea. The Hague: : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2000.

20

McDorman TL. Regional Port State control agreements: some issues of international law. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 2000;5.http://www.mainelaw.maine.edu/academics/oclj/vol-5-no-2.html

21

Lobach T. Port State control of foreign fishing vessels. 2002;29.http://catalogue.ppl.nl/CMD_COLLAPSE=N/DB=1/LNG=EN/SID=6a2b263f-0/XSLBASE=http%25253A%25252F%25252Flbs-vrep.oclc.org%25253A8282%25252Foclc_gui/XSLFILE=%2525253Fid%2525253D$c%25252526db%2525253D$d/CMD?ACT=SRCHA&IKT=4&SRT=YOP&TRM=Port State control of foreign fishing vessels

22

Özçayir ZO. Port state control. 2nd ed. London: : LLP 2004.

23

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

24

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

25

MV Saiga (No 2) Case (Judgment of 1 July 1999, Merits). 1999.http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=64&L=0

26

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

27

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

28

Attard DJ. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Oxford: : Clarendon 1987.

29

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

30

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

31

International Maritime Organization. IMO guidelines and standards for the removal of offshore installations and structures on the continental shelf and in the exclusive economic zone. 1989.https://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/Pages/A-1987-89.aspx

32

Vinogradov S. The Impact of the Deepwater Horizon: The Evolving International Legal Regime for Offshore Accidental Pollution Prevention, Preparedness, and Response. Ocean Development & International Law;44:335–62. doi:10.1080/00908320.2013.808938

33

Beckman R. Global Legal Regime on the Decommissioning of Offshore Installations and Structures. In: The Regulation of Continental Shelf Development: Rethinking International Standards. Leiden: : BRILL 2013. http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=1378743

34

Higgins R. Abandonment of energy sites and facilities: relevant international law. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law;11:6–16.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals

35

Rosalyn Higgins. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994.

36

Hossein Esmaeili. The legal regime of offshore oil rigs in international law. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2001.

37

Ayoade MA. Disused offshore installations and pipelines: towards ‘sustainable decommissioning’. The Hague: : Kluwer Law International 2002.

38

Kaiser MJ. A review of ship breaking and rig scrapping in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Development & International Law;39:178–99. doi:10.1080/00908320802013701

39

Kaiser MJ, Pulsipher AG. Rigs-to-reef programs in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Development & International Law;36:119–34. doi:10.1080/00908320590943990

40

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

41

Kaye S. Threats from the global commons: problems of jurisdiction and enforcement. Melbourne Journal of International Law 2007;8.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmeljil&collection=journals

42

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

43

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Convention on the High Seas. 1958.http://www.gc.noaa.gov/documents/

44

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

45

US Naval War College. US Commander’s handbook on the law of naval operations. ;NWP1-14M.http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/a9b8e92d-2c8d-4779-9925-0defea93325c/

46

Vaughan Lowe. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: survey for 2001. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2002;17.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=463&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc17&collection=journals#493

47

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

48

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

49

Reuland R. Interference with Non-National Ships on the High Seas: Peacetime Exceptions to the Exclusivity Rule of Flag State Jurisdiction. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Published Online First: 1989.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvantl&collection=journals

50

Natalie Klein. Maritime security and the law of the sea. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.

51

I.A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;35:320–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231

52

MV Saiga (No 2) Case (Judgment of 1 July 1999, Merits). 1999.http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=64&L=0

53

Grand Prince, ITLOS Case No. 8. 2001.http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=100

54

Anderson A. Jurisdiction over Stateless Vessels on the High Seas: an Appraisal under Domestic and International Law. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 1982;13.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjmlc&collection=journals

55

Treves T. Flags of Convenience before the Law of the Sea Tribunal. San Diego International Law Journal 2004;:179–89.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fsdintl&collection=journals

56

König D. Flags of Convenience. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?sfam=&q=flags+of+convenience&prd=EPIL&searchBtn=Search

57

Lagoni R. Merchant Ships. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?sfam=&q=merchant+ships&prd=EPIL&searchBtn=Search

58

Thomas AR, Duncan JC, Naval War College (U.S.). Annotated supplement to The commander’s handbook on the law of naval operations. Newport, R.I.: : Naval War College 1999.

59

United States v Cortes, 588 F.2d 106 (1979) at 110. American Journal of International Law 1979;73.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=514&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil73&collection=journals#520

60

Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990 (c.5), United Kingdom. 1990.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-CHH0-TWPY-Y170&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

61

Privy Council (Palestine). Molvan v Attorney General for Palestine [1948] AC 351 at 369. 20AD. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I0A2829C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

62

Oppenheim L, Jennings RY, Watts A. Oppenheim’s international law: Vol. 1: Peace. 9th ed. Harlow: : Longman 1992.

63

R v Dean and Bolden [1998] 2 Cr App Rep 171. Court: Court of Appeal Published Online First: 1998.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do

64

H. Meyers. The nationality of ships. The Hague: : Nijhoff 1967.

65

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

66

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

67

CNN. Chinese boats harassed U.S. ship, officials say. 5AD.http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/05/05/china.maritime.harassment/

68

Ball D. Intelligence collection operations and EEZs: the implications of new technology. Marine Policy;28:67–82. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2003.10.011

69

Bateman S. Hydrographic surveying in the EEZ: differences and overlaps with marine scientific research. Marine Policy;29:163–74. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2004.08.011

70

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

71

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

72

Pavliha M, Martínez Gutiérrez NA. Marine Scientific Research and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 2010;:115–33.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Foccoa&collection=journals

73

Dromgoole S. Revisiting the relationship between marine scientific research and the underwater cultural heritage. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2010;25:33–61.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=33&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc25&collection=journals#39

74

Hubert A-M. The new paradox in marine scientific research: regulating the potential environmental impacts of conducting ocean science. Ocean Development & International Law;42:329–55. doi:10.1080/00908320.2011.619368

75

Bork K, Karstensen J, Visbeck M, et al. The legal regulation of floats and gliders—in quest of a new regime? Ocean Development & International Law;39:298–328. doi:10.1080/00908320802235338

76

Attard DJ. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Oxford: : Clarendon 1987.

77

Alfred H. A. Soons. Marine scientific research and the law of the sea. Deventer, Netherlands: : Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1982.

78

Roach JA. Marine scientific research and the new law of the sea. Ocean Development & International Law 1996;27:59–72. doi:10.1080/00908329609546075

79

Nordquist MH, University of Virginia. Law, science & ocean management. Leiden: : Martinus Nijhoff 2007.

80

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

81

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

82

Churchill RR. Fisheries, Coastal. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law.http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?page=4&pageSize=10&q1=Fisheries%2C Coastal&sort=title

83

Barnes R. The Law of the Sea Convention: An effective framework for domestic fisheries regulation? In: The law of the sea : progress and prospects. Oxford University Press 2006. 233–60.http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg8012750&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg8012750&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%253A%2528UCL_LMS_DS%2529&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1390403175615&srt=rank&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=The%2520Law%2520of%2520the%2520Sea%2520freestone&vid=UCL_VU1

84

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

85

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

86

Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.

87

Attard DJ. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Oxford: : Clarendon 1987.

88

William T. Burke. The new international law of fisheries: UNCLOS 1982 and beyond. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994.

89

FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. 1995.http://www.fao.org/documents/en/empty.jsp?cx=018170620143701104933%3Aqq82jsfba7w&cof=FORID%3A11&q=FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries&x=8&y=11&search_radio=fao

90

United Nations: Johannesburg Summit. Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. 2002.http://www.un.org/jsummit/

91

FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2010.http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e00.htm

92

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

93

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

94

United Nations. UN Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks 1995. 1995.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_fish_stocks.htm

95

Freestone D. Fisheries, High Seas. In: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. 2009.

96

Freestone D. Fisheries, Commissions and Organizations. In: Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law. New York, NY: : Oxford University Press http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?page=6&pageSize=10&q1=Fisheries%2C+Commissions+and+Organizations&sort=title

97

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

98

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

99

Douglas Guilfoyle. Shipping interdiction and the law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.

100

Young MA. Trading fish, Saving fish: The Interaction between Regimes in International Law. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2011.

101

Davies PGG, Redgwell C. The International Legal Regulation of Straddling Fish Stocks. British Yearbook of International Law 1996;67:199–274.http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/67/1.toc

102

Lodge MW, Nandan SN. Some Suggestions Towards Better Implementation of the United Nations Agreement on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks of 1995. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2005;20:345–79. doi:10.1163/157180805775098540

103

Gjerde KM. High Seas Fisheries Management under the Convention on the Law of the Sea. In: The law of the sea : progress and prospects. Oxford University Press 2006. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg8012750&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg8012750&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%253A%2528UCL_LMS_DS%2529&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1390409877661&srt=rank&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=The%2520Law%2520of%2520the%2520Sea%2520freestone&vid=UCL_VU1

104

Balton DA. Strengthening the law of the sea: The new agreement on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. Ocean Development & International Law 1996;27:125–51. doi:10.1080/00908329609546078

105

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

106

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

107

United Nations. Agreement relating to the implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. 1994.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_part_xi.htm

108

David Freestone. Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area. American Journal of International Law;105:755–60.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.4.0755

109

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Seabed Disputes Chamber). Advisory Opinion on Responsibilities and Obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area. 1AD.http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=109&L=0#c587

110

French D. From the Depths: Rich Pickings of Principles of Sustainable Development and General International Law on the Ocean Floor — the Seabed Disputes Chamber’s 2011 Advisory Opinion. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2011;26:525–68.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fljmc&collection=journals

111

United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. The Law of the sea: official text of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea with annexes and index. New York: : United Nations 1983.

112

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

113

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

114

Franckx E. The International Seabed Authority and the Common Heritage of Mankind: The Need for States to Establish the Outer Limits of Their Continental Shelf. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2010;25.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=543&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc25&collection=journals#555

115

Hoagland P, Beaulieu S, Tivey MA, et al. Deep-sea mining of seafloor massive sulfides. Marine Policy;34:728–32. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.12.001

116

Lodge MM. International Seabed Authority’s Regulations on Prospecting and Exploration for Polymetallic Nodules in the Area. Journal of energy & natural resources law;20.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals

117

Nandan S. Administering the mineral resources of the deep seabed. In: The law of the sea : progress and prospects. 2006. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg8012750&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg8012750&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%253A%2528UCL_LMS_DS%2529&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1390916878992&srt=rank&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=The%2520Law%2520of%2520the%2520Sea%2520freestone&vid=UCL_VU1

118

Oude Elferink A. The Regime of the Area: Delineating the Scope of Application of the Common Heritage Principle and Freedom of the High Seas. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2007;22:143–76. doi:10.1163/157180807781475272

119

International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (i) ‘International Seabed Authority’. http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical

120

International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (ii) ‘The International Seabed Authority: Structure and Functioning’. http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical

121

International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (iii) ‘Contractors for Seabed Exploration’. http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical

122

International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (iv) ‘Protection of the Seabed Environment’. http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical

123

International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (v) ‘Marine Mineral Resources’. http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical

124

Scovazzi T. Mining, Protection of the Environment, Scientific Research and Bioprospecting: Some Considerations on the Role of the International Sea-Bed Authority. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2004;19:383–410. doi:10.1163/1571808053310125

125

Allen CH. Protecting the oceanic gardens of Eden: International law issues in deep-sea vent resources conservation and management. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 2000;:563–661.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fgintenlr&collection=journals

126

Arico S, Salpin C. Bioprospecting of Genetic Resources in the Deep Seabed:  Scientific, Legal and Policy Aspects. 2005.http://www.ias.unu.edu/sub_page.aspx?catID=111&ddlID=169

127

Imhoff JF, Hügler M. Life at deep sea hydrothermal vents: oases under water. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2009;24.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fljmc&collection=journals

128

Tanaka Y. Reflections on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources in the Deep Seabed Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction. Ocean Development & International Law;39:129–49. doi:10.1080/00908320802013719

129

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

130

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

131

Grossman N. Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia). The American Journal of International Law;107:396–403. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.2.0396

132

Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar). 14AD.http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=108

133

Anderson DH. Delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar). The American Journal of International Law;106:817–24. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.4.0817

134

Bederman DJ, Lathrop CG. Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). The American Journal of International Law;103:543–9.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40283657

135

Kirk EA. Case Concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v Honduras), Judgment of 8 October 2007. International and Comparative Law Quarterly;57:701–9. doi:10.1017/S0020589308000547

136

Lathrop CG. Territorial and Maritime Dispute Between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras). The American Journal of International Law;102:113–9.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40007771

137

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

138

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

139

US Naval War College. US Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations. ;NWP1-14M.http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/a9b8e92d-2c8d-4779-9925-0defea93325c/

140

Roach JA, Smith RW. Excessive maritime claims. Leiden: : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2012.

141

Lagoni R, Vignes D. Maritime Delimitation. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill Academic 2006.

142

Evans MD. Delimitation and the common maritime boundary. The British yearbook of international law Published Online First: 1994.http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/64/1.toc

143

Evans MD. Relevant circumstances and maritime delimitation. Oxford: : Clarendon 1989.

144

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

145

United Nations. UN Convention on the law of the sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

146

Trouwborst A. Comparing European Instruments for Marine Nature Conservation: The OSPAR Convention, the Bern Convention, the Birds and Habitats Directives, and the Added Value of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. European Energy and Environmental Law Review 1AD;20:129–49.https://www.swetswise.com/swoc-web/linkingDetails.html?openURL=false&issn=0966-1646&eissn=0966-1646&volume=20&issue=4&page=129

147

OSPAR. Convention for the Protection of the marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the OSPAR Convention). 1992.http://www.ospar.org/content/content.asp?menu=01481200000000_000000_000000

148

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

149

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

150

Tanaka Y. Regulation of Land-Based Marine Pollution in International Law: A Comparative Analysis Between Global and Regional Legal Frameworks. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 2006;66:535–74.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=external-journals%2Fhjil&collection=journals

151

Molenaar EJ, Oude Elferink AG. Marine protected areas in areas beyond national jurisdiction: The pioneering efforts under the OSPAR Convention. Utrecht Law Review;5:5–20.http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/index.php/ulr/article/view/URN%253ANBN%253ANL%253AUI%253A10-1-101111

152

United Nations. UN Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks 1995. 1995.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_fish_stocks.htm

153

IOPC. IOPC Civil Liability Convention 1992 and Fund Convention 1992. 1992.http://www.iopcfunds.org/about-us/legal-framework/1992-civil-liability-convention/

154

IOPC. IOPC - ‘General Explanatory Note’. 1992.http://www.iopcfunds.org/about-us/legal-framework/1992-civil-liability-convention/

155

United Nations. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters. 1998.http://www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.html

156

United Nations. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (‘Espoo Convention’). 1991.http://www.unece.org/env/eia/eia.html

157

United Nations. Rio Declaration - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 1992.http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78

158

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

159

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

160

Beckman RC. PSSAs and Transit Passage - Australia’s Pilotage System in the Torres Strait Challenges the IMO and UNCLOS. Ocean Development & International Law 2007;38:325–57. doi:10.1080/00908320701641552

161

Bateman S, White M. Compulsory Pilotage in the Torres Strait: Overcoming Unacceptable Risks to a Sensitive Marine Environment. Ocean Development & International Law 2009;40:184–203. doi:10.1080/00908320902864797

162

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

163

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

164

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

165

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

166

Andrew Serdy. The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf and Its Disturbing Propensity to Legislate. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2011;26.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=355&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc26&collection=journals#365

167

International Boundary Research Unit, Durham University. Map of Maritime jurisdiction and boundaries in the Arctic region. https://www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/resources/arctic/

168

Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, UNCLOS Annexe VII Arbitral Tribunal (Permanent Court of Arbitration) Award. 11AD.http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1152

169

United Nations. CLCS:  Rules of Procedure. 17AD.http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_rules.htm

170

United Nations. CLCS:  Scientific and Technical Guidelines CLCS/11. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_guidelines.htm

171

Ted L. McDorman. The Role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: A Technical Body in a Political World. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law;17.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=301&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc17&collection=journals#331

172

Kwiatkowska B. Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago. Award on Jurisdiction and Merits. The American Journal of International Law;101:149–57.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149830

173

Kwiatkowska B. The 2006 Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago Award: A Landmark in Compulsory Jurisdiction and Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2007;22.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=7&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc22&collection=journals#9

174

Rothwell DR. Issues and Strategies for Outer Continental Shelf Claims. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2008;23.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=185&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc23&collection=journals#189

175

International Law Association. Reports of the International Law Association’s Committee on Legal Issues of the Outer Continental Shelf. 2006.http://www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/33

176

Symposium issue on Outer Continental Shelf. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law;:263–373.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fljmc&collection=journals

177

D.P. O’Connell, I.A. Shearer. The International law of the sea: Vol.1. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1982.

178

Arctic Ocean Conference. The Ilulissat Declaration. http://www.arcticgovernance.org/the-ilulissat-declaration.4872424.html

179

William Thomas. Arctic debate heats up: ‘Ilulissat Declaration’ adopted by riparian states. International Energy Law Review 2008;5:178–80.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA6A6C22068EC11DDABB0CA62716D71C6&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

180

Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, UNCLOS Annexe VII Arbitral Tribunal (Permanent Court of Arbitration) Award. 11AD.http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1152

181

International Court of Justice. Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain [2001]. 2001.http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=443&p1=3&p2=3&case=87&p3=5

182

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

183

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

184

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing. 2009.http://www.fao.org/search/en/?cx=018170620143701104933%3Aqq82jsfba7w&q=Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent%2C Deter and Eliminate Illegal%2C Unreported and Unregulated Fishing 2009&cof=FORID%3A9&siteurl=www.fao.org%2Fhome%2Fen%2F&ref=&ss=77j5929j2

185

United Nations. UN Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks 1995. 1995.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_fish_stocks.htm

186

MV Saiga (No 2) Case (Judgment of 1 July 1999, Merits). 1999.http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=64&L=0

187

Natalie Klein. Maritime security and the law of the sea. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.

188

Klein N. Legal Limitations on Ensuring Australia’s Maritime Security. Melbourne Journal of International Law;7.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmeljil&collection=journals

189

Natalie Klein. Maritime security and the law of the sea. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.

190

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

191

Klein N, Mossop J, Rothwell D. Maritime security: international law and policy perspectives from Australia and New Zealand. Abingdon: : Routledge 2010.

192

Balkin R. The International Maritime Organization and Maritime Security. Tulane Maritime Law Journal 2006;30:1–34.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Ftulmar&collection=journals

193

Leiner FC. Maritime Security Zones: Prohibited Yet Perpetuated. Virginia Journal of International Law;24:967–92.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvajint&collection=journals

194

Becker MA. Shifting Public Order of the Oceans: Freedom of Navigation and the Interdiction of Ships at Sea, The. Harvard International Law Journal;46.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=131&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj46&collection=journals#137

195

Bralliar RB. Protecting U.S. Ports with Layered Security Measures for Container Ships. Military Law Review;185.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1&handle=hein.journals%252Fmilrv185&collection=journals#13

196

I.A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;35:320–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231

197

Douglas Guilfoyle. Interdicting Vessels to Enforce the Common Interest: Maritime Countermeasures and the Use of Force. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;56:69–82.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498053

198

US Naval War College. US Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (NWP1-14M). http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/a9b8e92d-2c8d-4779-9925-0defea93325c/

199

Rose G, Milligan B. Law for the Management of Antarctic Marine Living Resources: From Normative Conflicts towards Integrated Governance? Yearbook of International Environmental Law 2009;20:41–87. doi:10.1093/yiel/20.1.41

200

Gullett W, Schofield C. Pushing the Limits of the Law of the Sea Convention: Australian and French Cooperative Surveillance and Enforcement in the Southern Ocean. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2007;22:545–83. doi:10.1163/157180807782512224

201

Hulme K. Environmental Security: Implications for International Law. Yearbook of international environmental law 2008;19:3–26.http://yielaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1.toc

202

Milligan B. Marine Protected Areas in Antarctic Waters: A Review of Policy Options in the Context of International Law. In: Schofield CH, Yi S, Kwon M-S, eds. The limits of maritime jurisdiction. Leiden: : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2014.

203

Jaap Molenaar E. Multilateral Hot Pursuit and Illegal Fishing in the Southern Ocean: The Pursuits of the Viarsa 1 and the South Tomi. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2004;19:19–42. doi:10.1163/157180804773788655

204

Guilfoyle D. Treaty Jurisdiction Over Pirates: A Compilation of Legal Texts with Introductory Notes. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1537272

205

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

206

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Convention on the High Seas. 1958.http://www.gc.noaa.gov/documents/

207

Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation 1988 (1678 UNTS 201) ("the SUA Convention”). 1992.http://cil.nus.edu.sg/1988/1988-convention-for-the-suppression-of-unlawful-acts-against-the-safety-of-maritime-navigation/

208

Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, 12-35266. 25AD.http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000655

209

Guilfoyle D. Somali Pirates as Agents of Change in International Law–making and Organisation. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 2012;1:81–106.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcajoincla&collection=journals

210

Beckman R. Issues of Public International Law Relating to Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in the Malacca and Singapore Straits. Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law 1999;3.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fsinga&collection=journals

211

Garmon T. International Law of the Sea: Reconciling the Law of Piracy and Terrorism in the Wake of September 11th. Tulane Maritime Law Journal;27.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Ftulmar&collection=journals

212

Keyuan Z. Enforcing the Law of Piracy in the South China Sea. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 2000;31.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=107&handle=hein.journals%252Fjmlc31&collection=journals#117

213

Treves T. Piracy, Law of the Sea, and Use of Force: Developments off the Coast of Somalia. European Journal of International Law 2009;20.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7WG8-C7N0-YB3K-R1WC&csi=302155&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

214

Regional cooperation agreement on combating piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. International Legal Materials 2005;44:829–35.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20695507

215

International Maritime Organization. Code of Conduct Concerning the Repression of Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in the Western Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Aden 2009. 2009.http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Security/PIU/Pages/DCoC.aspx

216

Douglas Guilfoyle. Shipping interdiction and the law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.

217

Douglas Guilfoyle. Piracy off Somalia: UN Security Council Resolution 1816 and IMO Regional Counter-Piracy Efforts. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;57:690–9.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20488237

218

Guilfoyle D. Counter-piracy law enforcement and human rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2010;59. doi:10.1017/S002058930999011X

219

Guilfoyle D. Modern piracy: legal challenges and responses. Cheltenham: : Edward Elgar 2013.

220

Robin Geiss, Anna Petrig. Piracy and armed robbery at sea: the legal framework for counter-piracy operations in Somalia and the Gulf of Aden. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609529.001.0001

221

Donald Rothwell, Tim Stephens. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

222

Yoshifumi Tanaka. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

223

Reuland R. Interference with Non-National Ships on the High Seas: Peacetime Exceptions to the Exclusivity Rule of Flag State Jurisdiction. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Published Online First: 1989.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvantl&collection=journals

224

Malvina Halberstam. Terrorism on the High Seas: The Achille Lauro, Piracy and the IMO Convention on Maritime Safety. The American Journal of International Law;82:269–310.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203189

225

Bingham J, et al. Harvard Research in International Law: Draft Convention on Piracy. The American Journal of International Law 1932;26:739–885.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2213753

226

Myres Smith McDougal, William T. Burke. The public order of the oceans: a contemporary international law of the sea. 1962.

227

Rubin A. Revising the Law of Piracy. California Western International Law Journal 1990;21.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcalwi&collection=journals

228

Rubin AP. The law of piracy. Honolulu: : University Press of the Pacific Honolulu 2006.

229

Rubin AP. The Law of Piracy. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy;15.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fdenilp&collection=journals

230

Privy Council (United Kingdom). Re Piracy Jure Gentium [1934] AC 586. 26AD. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I22ED9030E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth

231

US Supreme Court. US v Smith, 18 U.S. (5 Wheaton) 153 (1820). 1820. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/18/153/case.html

232

Douglas Guilfoyle. Shipping interdiction and the law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.

233

Moreno-Lax V. Seeking Asylum in the Mediterranean: Against a Fragmentary Reading of EU Member States’ Obligations Accruing at Sea. International Journal of Refugee Law 2011;23:174–220. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eer005

234

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

235

United Nations. UN Convention against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. 1988.https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/illicit-trafficking.html

236

Council of Europe. Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, Implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1995 (Council of Europe Agreement 1995). 1995.http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=156&CM=8&DF=05/02/2014&CL=ENG

237

United Nations. UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC). 2000.http://www.unodc.org/unodc/treaties/CTOC/

238

Agreement concerning co-operation in suppressing illicit maritime and air trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the Caribbean area. 2003.http://www.minbuza.nl/en/key-topics/treaties/search-the-treaty-database/2003/4/010467.html

239

Goodwin-Gill GS. The Right to Seek Asylum: Interception at Sea and the Principle of Non-Refoulement. International Journal of Refugee Law 2011;23:443–57. doi:10.1093/ijrl/eer018

240

US-Malta PSI Agreement. 2007.http://www.state.gov/t/isn/trty/index.htm

241

US-Canada shiprider agreement. 2009.http://www.dhs.gov/news/2009/05/26/united-states-and-canada-act-jointly-combat-cross-border-crime

242

I.A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;35:320–43.http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231

243

William C. Gilmore. Agreement concerning co-operation in suppressing illicit maritime and air trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the Caribbean area. London: : TSO (The Stationery Office) 2005. http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/34707316?style=html&title=Agreement%20concerning%20co-operation%20in%20suppressing%20illicit

244

Gilmore WC. Narcotics interdiction at sea: The 1995 council of Europe agreement. Marine Policy;20:3–14. doi:0308-597X(95)00022-X

245

Gilmore WC. Drug trafficking by sea: The 1988 United Nations convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. Marine Policy;15:183–92. doi:0308-597X(91)90061-F

246

Palmer G. Guarding the Coast: Alien Migrant Interdiction Operations at Sea. Connecticut Law Review;29:1565–85.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fconlr&collection=journals

247

Donald L. Brown. Crooked Straits: Maritime Smuggling of Humans from Cuba to the United States. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review;33:273–93.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40176516

248

Chantal Marie-Jeanne Bostock. The International Legal Obligations Owed to the Asylum Seekers on the MV Tampa. International Journal of Refugee Law 2002;14.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=279&handle=hein.journals%252Fintjrl14&collection=journals#287

249

Penelope Mathew. Australian Refugee Protection in the Wake of the Tampa. The American Journal of International Law;96:661–76.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3062169

250

White M. Tampa Incident: Shipping, international and maritime legal issues. Australian Law Journal 2004;78:101–13.

251

White M. Tampa Incident: Some Subsequent Legal Issues. Australian Law Journal 2004;78.

252

Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1999.

253

United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

254

Quismundo T. UN court to rule soon on PH case vs China. 9AD.http://globalnation.inquirer.net/82871/un-court-to-rule-soon-on-ph-case-vs-china

255

Valencia M. A political maelstrom in the South China Sea. 15AD.http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/08/15/commentary/a-political-maelstrom-in-the-south-china-sea/#.Ug0I3pLCZ8E

256

Lori Fisler Damrosch, Oxman BH. The South China Sea: Editors’ Introduction. The American Journal of International Law;107:95–7.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0095

257

Robert Beckman. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea. The American Journal of International Law;107:142–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0142

258

Zhiguo Gao, Jia BB. The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications. The American Journal of International Law;107:98–124.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098

259

Miyoshi M. China’s "U-Shaped Line” Claim in the South China Sea: Any Validity Under International Law? Ocean Development & International Law;43:1–17. doi:10.1080/00908320.2011.619374

260

Alan E. Boyle. Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;46:37–54.http://www.jstor.org/stable/760513

261

Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: : Hart 2010.

262

Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.

263

Rayfuse R. The Future of Compulsory Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review;36:683–711.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvuwlr&collection=journals

264

Serdy A. The Paradoxical Success of UNCLOS Part XV: a Half-hearted Reply to Rosemary Rayfuse. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review;36:713–21.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvuwlr&collection=journals

265

Florian Dupuy, Dupuy P-M. A Legal Analysis of China’s Historic Rights Claim in the South China Sea. The American Journal of International Law;107:124–41.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0124

266

Gau MS-T. The U-Shaped Line and a Categorization of the Ocean Disputes in the South China Sea. Ocean Development & International Law;43:57–69. doi:10.1080/00908320.2012.647499

267

Keyuan Z. China’s U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea Revisited. Ocean Development & International Law;43:18–34. doi:10.1080/00908320.2012.647483

268

Anton DK. Dispute Concerning Japan’s JARPA II Program of "Scientific Whaling” (Australia v. Japan). 8AD;14.http://www.asil.org/insights/volume/14/issue/20/dispute-concerning-japan%E2%80%99s-jarpa-ii-program-%E2%80%9Cscientific-whaling%E2%80%9D

269

International Whaling Commission. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. 1946.http://iwc.int/convention

270

International Court of Justice. Australian Application instituting proceedings in Whaling in the Antarctic. 31AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=64&case=148&code=aj&p3=0

271

Klein N. Whales and Tuna: The Past and Future of Litigation between Australia and Japan. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 2009;21:143–218.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fgintenlr&collection=journals

272

Anton DK. Antarctic Whaling: Australia’s Attempt to Protect Whales in the Southern Ocean. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 2009;36:319–52.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fbcenv&collection=journals

273

Rothwell DR, Stephens T. Illegal Southern Ocean Fishing and Prompt Release: Balancing Coastal and Flag State Rights and Interests. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly;53:171–87.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663140

274

Mensah T. The Tribunal and the Prompt Release of Vessels. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2007;22:425–49. doi:10.1163/157180807781870327

275

United Nations. UN Convention on the law of the sea 1982. 1982.http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm

276

International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. The "Volga” Case (Russian Federation v. Australia). 2002.http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=103&L=0#c693

277

Tuerk H. The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to International Law. Penn State international law review;26:289–316.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fpsilr&collection=journals

278

Klein N. Dispute settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005.

279

Bantz VP. Views from Hamburg: The Juno Trader Case or How to Make Sense of the Coastal State’s Rights in the Light of Its Duty of Prompt Release. University of Queensland law journal 2005;24:415–44.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fqland&collection=journals

280

Churchill R. The Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Relating to Fisheries: Is There Much in the Net? The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2007;22:383–424. doi:10.1163/157180807781870336