1.
R.R. Churchill, A.V. Lowe. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
2.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
3.
Evans M. The Law of the Sea. International law [Internet]. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 651–686. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/LAWSG107_68777.pdf
4.
Harris DJ. Cases and materials on international law. 7th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2010.
5.
R.R. Churchill, A.V. Lowe. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
6.
International Maritime Organization. Focus on IMO - IMO 1948-1998, a process of change [Internet]. Available from: http://www.imo.org/KnowledgeCentre/ReferencesAndArchives/FocusOnIMO%28Archives%29/Pages/default.aspx
7.
D. H. Anderson. Legal Implications of the Entry into Force of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 1995;44(2):313–326. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/760753
8.
James Harrison. Making the law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
9.
Donald Rothwell, Tim Stephens. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
10.
Alan E. Boyle, C.M. Chinkin. The making of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
11.
D.P. O’Connell, I.A. Shearer. The International law of the sea: Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1982.
12.
R.R. Churchill, A.V. Lowe. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
13.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
14.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
15.
I. A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 35(2):320–343. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231
16.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
17.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
18.
International Court of Justice. Corfu Channel Case, Judgement of 9 April 1949 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=cd&case=1&code=cc&p3=4
19.
Rothwell DR. Innocent passage in the territorial sea: the UNCLOS regime and Asia Pacific state practice. Navigational rights and freedoms and the new law of the sea. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2000.
20.
McDorman TL. Regional Port State control agreements: some issues of international law. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal [Internet]. 2000;5(2). Available from: http://www.mainelaw.maine.edu/academics/oclj/vol-5-no-2.html
21.
Lobach T. Port State control of foreign fishing vessels [Internet]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2002. Available from: http://catalogue.ppl.nl/CMD_COLLAPSE=N/DB=1/LNG=EN/SID=6a2b263f-0/XSLBASE=http%25253A%25252F%25252Flbs-vrep.oclc.org%25253A8282%25252Foclc_gui/XSLFILE=%2525253Fid%2525253D$c%25252526db%2525253D$d/CMD?ACT=SRCHA&IKT=4&SRT=YOP&TRM=Port State control of foreign fishing vessels
22.
Özçayir ZO. Port state control. 2nd ed. London: LLP; 2004.
23.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
24.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
25.
MV Saiga (No 2) Case (Judgment of 1 July 1999, Merits) [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=64&L=0
26.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
27.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
28.
Attard DJ. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Oxford: Clarendon; 1987.
29.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
30.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
31.
International Maritime Organization. IMO guidelines and standards for the removal of offshore installations and structures on the continental shelf and in the exclusive economic zone [Internet]. 1989. Available from: https://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/Pages/A-1987-89.aspx
32.
Vinogradov S. The Impact of the Deepwater Horizon: The Evolving International Legal Regime for Offshore Accidental Pollution Prevention, Preparedness, and Response. Ocean Development & International Law. 44(4):335–362.
33.
Beckman R. Global Legal Regime on the Decommissioning of Offshore Installations and Structures. The Regulation of Continental Shelf Development: Rethinking International Standards [Internet]. Leiden: BRILL; 2013. Available from: http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=1378743
34.
Higgins R. Abandonment of energy sites and facilities: relevant international law. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 11(1):6–16. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
35.
Rosalyn Higgins. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1994.
36.
Hossein Esmaeili. The legal regime of offshore oil rigs in international law. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2001.
37.
Ayoade MA. Disused offshore installations and pipelines: towards ‘sustainable decommissioning’. The Hague: Kluwer Law International; 2002.
38.
Kaiser MJ. A review of ship breaking and rig scrapping in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Development & International Law. 39(2):178–199.
39.
Kaiser MJ, Pulsipher AG. Rigs-to-reef programs in the Gulf of Mexico. Ocean Development & International Law. 36(2):119–134.
40.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
41.
Kaye S. Threats from the global commons: problems of jurisdiction and enforcement. Melbourne Journal of International Law [Internet]. University of Melbourne; 2007;8. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmeljil&collection=journals
42.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
43.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Convention on the High Seas [Internet]. Washington: Great Neck Publishing; 1958. Available from: http://www.gc.noaa.gov/documents/
44.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
45.
US Naval War College. US Commander’s handbook on the law of naval operations [Internet]. Available from: http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/a9b8e92d-2c8d-4779-9925-0defea93325c/
46.
Vaughan Lowe. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: survey for 2001. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. 2002;17. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=463&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc17&collection=journals#493
47.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
48.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
49.
Reuland R. Interference with Non-National Ships on the High Seas: Peacetime Exceptions to the Exclusivity Rule of Flag State Jurisdiction. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law [Internet]. Vanderbilt University Law School; 1989; Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvantl&collection=journals
50.
Natalie Klein. Maritime security and the law of the sea. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
51.
I.A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 35(2):320–343. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231
52.
MV Saiga (No 2) Case (Judgment of 1 July 1999, Merits) [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=64&L=0
53.
Grand Prince, ITLOS Case No. 8 [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=100
54.
Anderson A. Jurisdiction over Stateless Vessels on the High Seas: an Appraisal under Domestic and International Law. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce [Internet]. Jefferson Law Book Company; 1982;13. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjmlc&collection=journals
55.
Treves T. Flags of Convenience before the Law of the Sea Tribunal. San Diego International Law Journal [Internet]. University of San Diego School of Law; 2004;(1):179–189. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fsdintl&collection=journals
56.
König D. Flags of Convenience. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [Internet]. Available from: http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?sfam=&q=flags+of+convenience&prd=EPIL&searchBtn=Search
57.
Lagoni R. Merchant Ships. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [Internet]. Available from: http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?sfam=&q=merchant+ships&prd=EPIL&searchBtn=Search
58.
Thomas AR, Duncan JC, Naval War College (U.S.). Annotated supplement to The commander’s handbook on the law of naval operations. Newport, R.I.: Naval War College; 1999.
59.
United States v Cortes, 588 F.2d 106 (1979) at 110. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1979;73. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=514&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil73&collection=journals#520
60.
Criminal Justice (International Co-operation) Act 1990 (c.5), United Kingdom [Internet]. 1990. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-CHH0-TWPY-Y170&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
61.
Privy Council (Palestine). Molvan v Attorney General for Palestine [1948] AC 351 at 369 [Internet]. 20AD. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=I0A2829C0E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
62.
Oppenheim L, Jennings RY, Watts A. Oppenheim’s international law: Vol. 1: Peace. 9th ed. Harlow: Longman; 1992.
63.
R v Dean and Bolden [1998] 2 Cr App Rep 171. Court: Court of Appeal [Internet]. 1998; Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do
64.
H. Meyers. The nationality of ships. The Hague: Nijhoff; 1967.
65.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
66.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
67.
CNN. Chinese boats harassed U.S. ship, officials say [Internet]. 5AD. Available from: http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/05/05/china.maritime.harassment/
68.
Ball D. Intelligence collection operations and EEZs: the implications of new technology. Marine Policy. 28(1):67–82.
69.
Bateman S. Hydrographic surveying in the EEZ: differences and overlaps with marine scientific research. Marine Policy. 29(2):163–174.
70.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
71.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
72.
Pavliha M, Martínez Gutiérrez NA. Marine Scientific Research and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal [Internet]. University of Maine School of Law; 2010;(1):115–133. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Foccoa&collection=journals
73.
Dromgoole S. Revisiting the relationship between marine scientific research and the underwater cultural heritage. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. 2010;25(1):33–61. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=33&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc25&collection=journals#39
74.
Hubert AM. The new paradox in marine scientific research: regulating the potential environmental impacts of conducting ocean science. Ocean Development & International Law. 42(4):329–355.
75.
Bork K, Karstensen J, Visbeck M, Zimmermann A. The legal regulation of floats and gliders—in quest of a new regime? Ocean Development & International Law. 39(3):298–328.
76.
Attard DJ. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Oxford: Clarendon; 1987.
77.
Alfred H. A. Soons. Marine scientific research and the law of the sea. Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers; 1982.
78.
Roach JA. Marine scientific research and the new law of the sea. Ocean Development & International Law. 1996;27(1–2):59–72.
79.
Nordquist MH, University of Virginia. Law, science & ocean management. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff; 2007.
80.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
81.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
82.
Churchill RR. Fisheries, Coastal. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [Internet]. Available from: http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?page=4&pageSize=10&q1=Fisheries%2C Coastal&sort=title
83.
Barnes R. The Law of the Sea Convention: An effective framework for domestic fisheries regulation? The law of the sea : progress and prospects [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 233–260. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg8012750&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg8012750&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%253A%2528UCL_LMS_DS%2529&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1390403175615&srt=rank&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=The%2520Law%2520of%2520the%2520Sea%2520freestone&vid=UCL_VU1
84.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
85.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
86.
Birnie PW, Boyle AE, Redgwell C. International law and the environment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
87.
Attard DJ. The exclusive economic zone in international law. Oxford: Clarendon; 1987.
88.
William T. Burke. The new international law of fisheries: UNCLOS 1982 and beyond. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1994.
89.
FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.fao.org/documents/en/empty.jsp?cx=018170620143701104933%3Aqq82jsfba7w&cof=FORID%3A11&q=FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries&x=8&y=11&search_radio=fao
90.
United Nations: Johannesburg Summit. Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.un.org/jsummit/
91.
FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1820e/i1820e00.htm
92.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
93.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
94.
United Nations. UN Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks 1995 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_fish_stocks.htm
95.
Freestone D. Fisheries, High Seas. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. 2009.
96.
Freestone D. Fisheries, Commissions and Organizations. Max Planck encyclopedia of public international law [Internet]. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; Available from: http://opil.ouplaw.com/search?page=6&pageSize=10&q1=Fisheries%2C+Commissions+and+Organizations&sort=title
97.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
98.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
99.
Douglas Guilfoyle. Shipping interdiction and the law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
100.
Young MA. Trading fish, Saving fish: The Interaction between Regimes in International Law. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
101.
Davies PGG, Redgwell C. The International Legal Regulation of Straddling Fish Stocks. British Yearbook of International Law [Internet]. 1996;67(1):199–274. Available from: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/67/1.toc
102.
Lodge MW, Nandan SN. Some Suggestions Towards Better Implementation of the United Nations Agreement on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks of 1995. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 2005;20(3):345–379.
103.
Gjerde KM. High Seas Fisheries Management under the Convention on the Law of the Sea. The law of the sea : progress and prospects [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg8012750&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg8012750&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%253A%2528UCL_LMS_DS%2529&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1390409877661&srt=rank&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=The%2520Law%2520of%2520the%2520Sea%2520freestone&vid=UCL_VU1
104.
Balton DA. Strengthening the law of the sea: The new agreement on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. Ocean Development & International Law. 1996;27(1–2):125–151.
105.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
106.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
107.
United Nations. Agreement relating to the implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_part_xi.htm
108.
David Freestone. Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to Activities in the Area. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 105(4):755–760. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.4.0755
109.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (Seabed Disputes Chamber). Advisory Opinion on Responsibilities and Obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area [Internet]. 1AD. Available from: http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=109&L=0#c587
110.
French D. From the Depths: Rich Pickings of Principles of Sustainable Development and General International Law on the Ocean Floor — the Seabed Disputes Chamber’s 2011 Advisory Opinion. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. Brill Academic Publishers; 2011;26:525–568. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fljmc&collection=journals
111.
United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. The Law of the sea: official text of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea with annexes and index. New York: United Nations; 1983.
112.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
113.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
114.
Franckx E. The International Seabed Authority and the Common Heritage of Mankind: The Need for States to Establish the Outer Limits of Their Continental Shelf. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. 2010;25. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=543&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc25&collection=journals#555
115.
Hoagland P, Beaulieu S, Tivey MA, Eggert RG, German C, Glowka L, Lin J. Deep-sea mining of seafloor massive sulfides. Marine Policy. 34(3):728–732.
116.
Lodge MM. International Seabed Authority’s Regulations on Prospecting and Exploration for Polymetallic Nodules in the Area. Journal of energy & natural resources law [Internet]. International Bar Association; 20(3). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fjenrl&collection=journals
117.
Nandan S. Administering the mineral resources of the deep seabed. The law of the sea : progress and prospects [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg8012750&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg8012750&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=1&scp.scps=scope%253A%2528UCL_LMS_DS%2529&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1390916878992&srt=rank&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=The%2520Law%2520of%2520the%2520Sea%2520freestone&vid=UCL_VU1
118.
Oude Elferink A. The Regime of the Area: Delineating the Scope of Application of the Common Heritage Principle and Freedom of the High Seas. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 2007;22(1):143–176.
119.
International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (i) ‘International Seabed Authority’ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical
120.
International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (ii) ‘The International Seabed Authority: Structure and Functioning’ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical
121.
International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (iii) ‘Contractors for Seabed Exploration’ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical
122.
International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (iv) ‘Protection of the Seabed Environment’ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical
123.
International Seabed Authority: brochure on: (v) ‘Marine Mineral Resources’ [Internet]. Available from: http://www.isa.org.jm/en/documents/technical
124.
Scovazzi T. Mining, Protection of the Environment, Scientific Research and Bioprospecting: Some Considerations on the Role of the International Sea-Bed Authority. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 2004;19(4):383–410.
125.
Allen CH. Protecting the oceanic gardens of Eden: International law issues in deep-sea vent resources conservation and management. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review [Internet]. Georgetown University Law Center; 2000;563–661. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fgintenlr&collection=journals
126.
Arico S, Salpin C. Bioprospecting of Genetic Resources in the Deep Seabed: Scientific, Legal and Policy Aspects [Internet]. UNU-IAS Reports and Policy Briefs; 2005. Available from: http://www.ias.unu.edu/sub_page.aspx?catID=111&ddlID=169
127.
Imhoff JF, Hügler M. Life at deep sea hydrothermal vents: oases under water. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. Brill Academic Publishers; 2009;24(2). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fljmc&collection=journals
128.
Tanaka Y. Reflections on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Genetic Resources in the Deep Seabed Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction. Ocean Development & International Law. 39(2):129–149.
129.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
130.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
131.
Grossman N. Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia). The American Journal of International Law. 107(2):396–403.
132.
Dispute concerning delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar) [Internet]. 14AD. Available from: http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=108
133.
Anderson DH. Delimitation of the maritime boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar). The American Journal of International Law. 106(4):817–824.
134.
Bederman DJ, Lathrop CG. Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 103(3):543–549. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40283657
135.
Kirk EA. Case Concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v Honduras), Judgment of 8 October 2007. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 57(03):701–709.
136.
Lathrop CG. Territorial and Maritime Dispute Between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras). The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 102(1):113–119. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40007771
137.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
138.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
139.
US Naval War College. US Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations [Internet]. Available from: http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/a9b8e92d-2c8d-4779-9925-0defea93325c/
140.
Roach JA, Smith RW. Excessive maritime claims. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2012.
141.
Lagoni R, Vignes D. Maritime Delimitation. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill Academic; 2006.
142.
Evans MD. Delimitation and the common maritime boundary. The British yearbook of international law [Internet]. 1994; Available from: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/64/1.toc
143.
Evans MD. Relevant circumstances and maritime delimitation. Oxford: Clarendon; 1989.
144.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
145.
United Nations. UN Convention on the law of the sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
146.
Trouwborst A. Comparing European Instruments for Marine Nature Conservation: The OSPAR Convention, the Bern Convention, the Birds and Habitats Directives, and the Added Value of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. European Energy and Environmental Law Review [Internet]. Kluwer Law International; 1AD;20(4):129–149. Available from: https://www.swetswise.com/swoc-web/linkingDetails.html?openURL=false&issn=0966-1646&eissn=0966-1646&volume=20&issue=4&page=129
147.
OSPAR. Convention for the Protection of the marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic (the OSPAR Convention) [Internet]. 1992. Available from: http://www.ospar.org/content/content.asp?menu=01481200000000_000000_000000
148.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
149.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
150.
Tanaka Y. Regulation of Land-Based Marine Pollution in International Law: A Comparative Analysis Between Global and Regional Legal Frameworks. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht [Internet]. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law; 2006;66(14):535–574. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=external-journals%2Fhjil&collection=journals
151.
Molenaar EJ, Oude Elferink AG. Marine protected areas in areas beyond national jurisdiction: The pioneering efforts under the OSPAR Convention. Utrecht Law Review [Internet]. 5(1):5–20. Available from: http://www.utrechtlawreview.org/index.php/ulr/article/view/URN%253ANBN%253ANL%253AUI%253A10-1-101111
152.
United Nations. UN Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks 1995 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_fish_stocks.htm
153.
IOPC. IOPC Civil Liability Convention 1992 and Fund Convention 1992 [Internet]. 1992. Available from: http://www.iopcfunds.org/about-us/legal-framework/1992-civil-liability-convention/
154.
IOPC. IOPC - ‘General Explanatory Note’ [Internet]. 1992. Available from: http://www.iopcfunds.org/about-us/legal-framework/1992-civil-liability-convention/
155.
United Nations. Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.unece.org/env/pp/treatytext.html
156.
United Nations. Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (‘Espoo Convention’) [Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://www.unece.org/env/eia/eia.html
157.
United Nations. Rio Declaration - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) [Internet]. 1992. Available from: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78
158.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
159.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
160.
Beckman RC. PSSAs and Transit Passage - Australia’s Pilotage System in the Torres Strait Challenges the IMO and UNCLOS. Ocean Development & International Law. 2007;38(4):325–357.
161.
Bateman S, White M. Compulsory Pilotage in the Torres Strait: Overcoming Unacceptable Risks to a Sensitive Marine Environment. Ocean Development & International Law. 2009;40(2):184–203.
162.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
163.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
164.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
165.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
166.
Andrew Serdy. The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf and Its Disturbing Propensity to Legislate. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. 2011;26(3). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=355&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc26&collection=journals#365
167.
International Boundary Research Unit, Durham University. Map of Maritime jurisdiction and boundaries in the Arctic region [Internet]. Available from: https://www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/resources/arctic/
168.
Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, UNCLOS Annexe VII Arbitral Tribunal (Permanent Court of Arbitration) Award [Internet]. 11AD. Available from: http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1152
169.
United Nations. CLCS: Rules of Procedure [Internet]. 17AD. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_rules.htm
170.
United Nations. CLCS: Scientific and Technical Guidelines CLCS/11 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_guidelines.htm
171.
Ted L. McDorman. The Role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: A Technical Body in a Political World. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. 17. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=301&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc17&collection=journals#331
172.
Kwiatkowska B. Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago. Award on Jurisdiction and Merits. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 101(1):149–157. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149830
173.
Kwiatkowska B. The 2006 Barbados/Trinidad and Tobago Award: A Landmark in Compulsory Jurisdiction and Equitable Maritime Boundary Delimitation. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. 2007;22. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=7&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc22&collection=journals#9
174.
Rothwell DR. Issues and Strategies for Outer Continental Shelf Claims. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. 2008;23. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=185&handle=hein.journals%252Fljmc23&collection=journals#189
175.
International Law Association. Reports of the International Law Association’s Committee on Legal Issues of the Outer Continental Shelf [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.ila-hq.org/en/committees/index.cfm/cid/33
176.
Symposium issue on Outer Continental Shelf. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law [Internet]. Brill Academic Publishers; (3):263–373. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fljmc&collection=journals
177.
D.P. O’Connell, I.A. Shearer. The International law of the sea: Vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1982.
178.
Arctic Ocean Conference. The Ilulissat Declaration [Internet]. Available from: http://www.arcticgovernance.org/the-ilulissat-declaration.4872424.html
179.
William Thomas. Arctic debate heats up: ‘Ilulissat Declaration’ adopted by riparian states. International Energy Law Review [Internet]. 2008;5:178–180. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA6A6C22068EC11DDABB0CA62716D71C6&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
180.
Arbitration between Barbados and the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago, UNCLOS Annexe VII Arbitral Tribunal (Permanent Court of Arbitration) Award [Internet]. 11AD. Available from: http://www.pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1152
181.
International Court of Justice. Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain [2001] [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?sum=443&p1=3&p2=3&case=87&p3=5
182.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
183.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
184.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.fao.org/search/en/?cx=018170620143701104933%3Aqq82jsfba7w&q=Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent%2C Deter and Eliminate Illegal%2C Unreported and Unregulated Fishing 2009&cof=FORID%3A9&siteurl=www.fao.org%2Fhome%2Fen%2F&ref=&ss=77j5929j2
185.
United Nations. UN Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks 1995 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_fish_stocks.htm
186.
MV Saiga (No 2) Case (Judgment of 1 July 1999, Merits) [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=64&L=0
187.
Natalie Klein. Maritime security and the law of the sea. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
188.
Klein N. Legal Limitations on Ensuring Australia’s Maritime Security. Melbourne Journal of International Law [Internet]. University of Melbourne; 7(2). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fmeljil&collection=journals
189.
Natalie Klein. Maritime security and the law of the sea. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
190.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
191.
Klein N, Mossop J, Rothwell D. Maritime security: international law and policy perspectives from Australia and New Zealand. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010.
192.
Balkin R. The International Maritime Organization and Maritime Security. Tulane Maritime Law Journal [Internet]. Tulane University School of Law; 2006;30(1 & 2):1–34. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Ftulmar&collection=journals
193.
Leiner FC. Maritime Security Zones: Prohibited Yet Perpetuated. Virginia Journal of International Law [Internet]. University of Virginia School of Law; 24(4):967–992. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvajint&collection=journals
194.
Becker MA. Shifting Public Order of the Oceans: Freedom of Navigation and the Interdiction of Ships at Sea, The. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 46(1). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=131&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj46&collection=journals#137
195.
Bralliar RB. Protecting U.S. Ports with Layered Security Measures for Container Ships. Military Law Review [Internet]. 185. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1&handle=hein.journals%252Fmilrv185&collection=journals#13
196.
I.A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 35(2):320–343. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231
197.
Douglas Guilfoyle. Interdicting Vessels to Enforce the Common Interest: Maritime Countermeasures and the Use of Force. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 56(1):69–82. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498053
198.
US Naval War College. US Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (NWP1-14M) [Internet]. Newport, Rhode Island; Available from: http://www.usnwc.edu/getattachment/a9b8e92d-2c8d-4779-9925-0defea93325c/
199.
Rose G, Milligan B. Law for the Management of Antarctic Marine Living Resources: From Normative Conflicts towards Integrated Governance? Yearbook of International Environmental Law. 2009;20(1):41–87.
200.
Gullett W, Schofield C. Pushing the Limits of the Law of the Sea Convention: Australian and French Cooperative Surveillance and Enforcement in the Southern Ocean. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 2007;22(4):545–583.
201.
Hulme K. Environmental Security: Implications for International Law. Yearbook of international environmental law [Internet]. 2008;19(1):3–26. Available from: http://yielaw.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1.toc
202.
Milligan B. Marine Protected Areas in Antarctic Waters: A Review of Policy Options in the Context of International Law. In: Schofield CH, Yi S u, Kwon MS, editors. The limits of maritime jurisdiction. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 2014.
203.
Jaap Molenaar E. Multilateral Hot Pursuit and Illegal Fishing in the Southern Ocean: The Pursuits of the Viarsa 1 and the South Tomi. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 2004;19(1):19–42.
204.
Guilfoyle D. Treaty Jurisdiction Over Pirates: A Compilation of Legal Texts with Introductory Notes [Internet]. Working Group 2 on Legal Issues, Contact Group on Piracy off the Coast of Somalia; Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228227570_Treaty_Jurisdiction_Over_Pirates_A_Compilation_of_Legal_Texts_with_Introductory_Notes
205.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
206.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Convention on the High Seas [Internet]. Washington: Great Neck Publishing; 1958. Available from: http://www.gc.noaa.gov/documents/
207.
Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation 1988 (1678 UNTS 201) ("the SUA Convention”) [Internet]. National University of Singapore; 1992. Available from: http://cil.nus.edu.sg/1988/1988-convention-for-the-suppression-of-unlawful-acts-against-the-safety-of-maritime-navigation/
208.
Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, 12-35266 [Internet]. US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit; 25AD. Available from: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php?pk_id=0000000655
209.
Guilfoyle D. Somali Pirates as Agents of Change in International Law–making and Organisation. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law [Internet]. Cambridge University; 2012;1(3):81–106. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcajoincla&collection=journals
210.
Beckman R. Issues of Public International Law Relating to Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in the Malacca and Singapore Straits. Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law [Internet]. National University of Singapore Faculty of Law; 1999;3(2). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fsinga&collection=journals
211.
Garmon T. International Law of the Sea: Reconciling the Law of Piracy and Terrorism in the Wake of September 11th. Tulane Maritime Law Journal [Internet]. Tulane University School of Law; 27(1). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Ftulmar&collection=journals
212.
Keyuan Z. Enforcing the Law of Piracy in the South China Sea. Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce [Internet]. 2000;31. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=107&handle=hein.journals%252Fjmlc31&collection=journals#117
213.
Treves T. Piracy, Law of the Sea, and Use of Force: Developments off the Coast of Somalia. European Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2009;20(2). Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7WG8-C7N0-YB3K-R1WC&csi=302155&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
214.
Regional cooperation agreement on combating piracy and armed robbery against ships in Asia. International Legal Materials [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 2005;44(4):829–835. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20695507
215.
International Maritime Organization. Code of Conduct Concerning the Repression of Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in the Western Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Aden 2009 [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Security/PIU/Pages/DCoC.aspx
216.
Douglas Guilfoyle. Shipping interdiction and the law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
217.
Douglas Guilfoyle. Piracy off Somalia: UN Security Council Resolution 1816 and IMO Regional Counter-Piracy Efforts. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 57(3):690–699. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20488237
218.
Guilfoyle D. Counter-piracy law enforcement and human rights. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2010;59(1).
219.
Guilfoyle D. Modern piracy: legal challenges and responses. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2013.
220.
Robin Geiss, Anna Petrig. Piracy and armed robbery at sea: the legal framework for counter-piracy operations in Somalia and the Gulf of Aden [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609529.001.0001
221.
Donald Rothwell, Tim Stephens. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
222.
Yoshifumi Tanaka. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
223.
Reuland R. Interference with Non-National Ships on the High Seas: Peacetime Exceptions to the Exclusivity Rule of Flag State Jurisdiction. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law [Internet]. Vanderbilt University Law School; 1989; Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvantl&collection=journals
224.
Malvina Halberstam. Terrorism on the High Seas: The Achille Lauro, Piracy and the IMO Convention on Maritime Safety. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 82(2):269–310. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2203189
225.
Bingham J, et al. Harvard Research in International Law: Draft Convention on Piracy. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 1932;26(1):739–885. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2213753
226.
Myres Smith McDougal, William T. Burke. The public order of the oceans: a contemporary international law of the sea. 1962.
227.
Rubin A. Revising the Law of Piracy. California Western International Law Journal [Internet]. California Western School of Law; 1990;21(1). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcalwi&collection=journals
228.
Rubin AP. The law of piracy. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific Honolulu; 2006.
229.
Rubin AP. The Law of Piracy. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy [Internet]. University of Denver College of Law; 15(2 & 3). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fdenilp&collection=journals
230.
Privy Council (United Kingdom). Re Piracy Jure Gentium [1934] AC 586 [Internet]. 26AD. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I22ED9030E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
231.
US Supreme Court. US v Smith, 18 U.S. (5 Wheaton) 153 (1820) [Internet]. 1820. Available from: http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/18/153/case.html
232.
Douglas Guilfoyle. Shipping interdiction and the law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
233.
Moreno-Lax V. Seeking Asylum in the Mediterranean: Against a Fragmentary Reading of EU Member States’ Obligations Accruing at Sea. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2011;23(2):174–220.
234.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
235.
United Nations. UN Convention against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances [Internet]. 1988. Available from: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/illicit-trafficking.html
236.
Council of Europe. Agreement on Illicit Traffic by Sea, Implementing Article 17 of the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances 1995 (Council of Europe Agreement 1995) [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=156&CM=8&DF=05/02/2014&CL=ENG
237.
United Nations. UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC) [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/treaties/CTOC/
238.
Agreement concerning co-operation in suppressing illicit maritime and air trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the Caribbean area [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.minbuza.nl/en/key-topics/treaties/search-the-treaty-database/2003/4/010467.html
239.
Goodwin-Gill GS. The Right to Seek Asylum: Interception at Sea and the Principle of Non-Refoulement. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2011;23(3):443–457.
240.
US-Malta PSI Agreement [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.state.gov/t/isn/trty/index.htm
241.
US-Canada shiprider agreement [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.dhs.gov/news/2009/05/26/united-states-and-canada-act-jointly-combat-cross-border-crime
242.
I.A. Shearer. Problems of Jurisdiction and Law Enforcement against Delinquent Vessels. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 35(2):320–343. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/759231
243.
William C. Gilmore. Agreement concerning co-operation in suppressing illicit maritime and air trafficking in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in the Caribbean area [Internet]. London: TSO (The Stationery Office); 2005. Available from: http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/34707316?style=html&title=Agreement%20concerning%20co-operation%20in%20suppressing%20illicit
244.
Gilmore WC. Narcotics interdiction at sea: The 1995 council of Europe agreement. Marine Policy [Internet]. 20(1):3–14. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308597X9500022X
245.
Gilmore WC. Drug trafficking by sea: The 1988 United Nations convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. Marine Policy [Internet]. 15(3):183–192. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0308597X9190061F
246.
Palmer G. Guarding the Coast: Alien Migrant Interdiction Operations at Sea. Connecticut Law Review [Internet]. University of Connecticut School of Law; 29(4):1565–1585. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fconlr&collection=journals
247.
Donald L. Brown. Crooked Straits: Maritime Smuggling of Humans from Cuba to the United States. The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review [Internet]. Joe Christensen, Inc.; 33(2):273–293. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40176516
248.
Chantal Marie-Jeanne Bostock. The International Legal Obligations Owed to the Asylum Seekers on the MV Tampa. International Journal of Refugee Law [Internet]. 2002;14(2/3). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=279&handle=hein.journals%252Fintjrl14&collection=journals#287
249.
Penelope Mathew. Australian Refugee Protection in the Wake of the Tampa. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 96(3):661–676. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3062169
250.
White M. Tampa Incident: Shipping, international and maritime legal issues. Australian Law Journal. 2004;78:101–113.
251.
White M. Tampa Incident: Some Subsequent Legal Issues. Australian Law Journal. 2004;78.
252.
Churchill RR, Lowe AV. The law of the sea. 3rd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1999.
253.
United Nations. UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
254.
Quismundo T. UN court to rule soon on PH case vs China [Internet]. Philippine Daily Inquirer; 9AD. Available from: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/82871/un-court-to-rule-soon-on-ph-case-vs-china
255.
Valencia M. A political maelstrom in the South China Sea [Internet]. Japan Times; 15AD. Available from: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2013/08/15/commentary/a-political-maelstrom-in-the-south-china-sea/#.Ug0I3pLCZ8E
256.
Lori Fisler Damrosch, Oxman BH. The South China Sea: Editors’ Introduction. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 107(1):95–97. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0095
257.
Robert Beckman. The UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Maritime Disputes in the South China Sea. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 107(1):142–163. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0142
258.
Zhiguo Gao, Jia BB. The Nine-Dash Line in the South China Sea: History, Status, and Implications. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 107(1):98–124. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0098
259.
Miyoshi M. China’s "U-Shaped Line” Claim in the South China Sea: Any Validity Under International Law? Ocean Development & International Law. 43(1):1–17.
260.
Alan E. Boyle. Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 46(1):37–54. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/760513
261.
Rothwell D, Stephens T. The international law of the sea. Oxford: Hart; 2010.
262.
Tanaka Y. The international law of the sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
263.
Rayfuse R. The Future of Compulsory Dispute Settlement under the Law of the Sea Convention. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [Internet]. Victoria University of Wellington; 36(4):683–711. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvuwlr&collection=journals
264.
Serdy A. The Paradoxical Success of UNCLOS Part XV: a Half-hearted Reply to Rosemary Rayfuse. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review [Internet]. Victoria University of Wellington; 36(4):713–721. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fvuwlr&collection=journals
265.
Florian Dupuy, Dupuy PM. A Legal Analysis of China’s Historic Rights Claim in the South China Sea. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 107(1):124–141. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0124
266.
Gau MST. The U-Shaped Line and a Categorization of the Ocean Disputes in the South China Sea. Ocean Development & International Law. 43(1):57–69.
267.
Keyuan Z. China’s U-Shaped Line in the South China Sea Revisited. Ocean Development & International Law. 43(1):18–34.
268.
Anton DK. Dispute Concerning Japan’s JARPA II Program of "Scientific Whaling” (Australia v. Japan) [Internet]. ASIL Insight; 8AD. Available from: http://www.asil.org/insights/volume/14/issue/20/dispute-concerning-japan%E2%80%99s-jarpa-ii-program-%E2%80%9Cscientific-whaling%E2%80%9D
269.
International Whaling Commission. International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling [Internet]. 1946. Available from: http://iwc.int/convention
270.
International Court of Justice. Australian Application instituting proceedings in Whaling in the Antarctic [Internet]. 31AD. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&k=64&case=148&code=aj&p3=0
271.
Klein N. Whales and Tuna: The Past and Future of Litigation between Australia and Japan. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review [Internet]. Georgetown University Law Center; 2009;21(2):143–218. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fgintenlr&collection=journals
272.
Anton DK. Antarctic Whaling: Australia’s Attempt to Protect Whales in the Southern Ocean. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review [Internet]. Boston College Law School; 2009;36(2):319–352. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fbcenv&collection=journals
273.
Rothwell DR, Stephens T. Illegal Southern Ocean Fishing and Prompt Release: Balancing Coastal and Flag State Rights and Interests. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 53(1):171–187. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663140
274.
Mensah T. The Tribunal and the Prompt Release of Vessels. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 2007;22(3):425–449.
275.
United Nations. UN Convention on the law of the sea 1982 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/convention_overview_convention.htm
276.
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. The "Volga” Case (Russian Federation v. Australia) [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.itlos.org/index.php?id=103&L=0#c693
277.
Tuerk H. The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to International Law. Penn State international law review [Internet]. Dickinson School of Law, Pennsylvania State University; 26(2):289–316. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fpsilr&collection=journals
278.
Klein N. Dispute settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
279.
Bantz VP. Views from Hamburg: The Juno Trader Case or How to Make Sense of the Coastal State’s Rights in the Light of Its Duty of Prompt Release. University of Queensland law journal [Internet]. University of Queensland Press; 2005;24(2):415–444. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fqland&collection=journals
280.
Churchill R. The Jurisprudence of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Relating to Fisheries: Is There Much in the Net? The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. 2007;22(3):383–424.
