[1]
G. B. Moskowitz, Social cognition: understanding self and others, vol. Texts in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press, 2005.
[2]
A. Todorov, C. Y. Olivola, R. Dotsch, and P. Mende-Siedlecki, ‘Social Attributions from Faces: Determinants, Consequences, Accuracy, and Functional Significance’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 519–545, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831.
[3]
N. Epley, A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo, ‘On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.’, Psychological Review, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 864–886, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://oce.ovid.com/article/00006832-200710000-00002/HTML
[4]
A. Waytz, C. K. Morewedge, N. Epley, G. Monteleone, J.-H. Gao, and J. T. Cacioppo, ‘Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 410–435, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://oce.ovid.com/article/00005205-201009000-00002/HTML
[5]
J. Kätsyri, K. Förger, M. Mäkäräinen, and T. Takala, ‘A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00390.
[6]
K. F. MacDorman and H. Ishiguro, ‘The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research’, Interaction Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 297–337, 2006, doi: 10.1075/is.7.3.03mac.
[7]
S. Wang, S. O. Lilienfeld, and P. Rochat, ‘The uncanny valley: Existence and explanations.’, Review of General Psychology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 393–407, 2015, doi: 10.1037/gpr0000056.
[8]
M. Coeckelbergh, ‘Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception, and performance of artificial agents’, AI & SOCIETY, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 181–189, Sep. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s00146-009-0208-3.
[9]
K. Gray, A. Waytz, and L. Young, ‘The Moral Dyad: A Fundamental Template Unifying Moral Judgment’, Psychological Inquiry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 206–215, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.686247.
[10]
K. Gray, L. Young, and A. Waytz, ‘Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality’, Psychological Inquiry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 101–124, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387.
[11]
A. C. Merritt, D. A. Effron, and B. Monin, ‘Moral Self-Licensing: When Being Good Frees Us to Be Bad’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 344–357, May 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x.
[12]
J. L. Hilton and W. von Hippel, ‘STEREOTYPES’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 237–271, Feb. 1996, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237.
[13]
Z. Kunda and S. J. Spencer, ‘When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application.’, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 129, no. 4, pp. 522–544, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://oce.ovid.com/article/00006823-200307000-00003/HTML
[14]
M. Hewstone, M. Rubin, and H. Willis, ‘Intergroup Bias’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 575–604, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109.
[15]
N. Haslam, S. Loughnan, Y. Kashima, and P. Bain, ‘Attributing and denying humanness to others’, European Review of Social Psychology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 55–85, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1080/10463280801981645.
[16]
D. M. Mackie, E. R. Smith, and D. G. Ray, ‘Intergroup Emotions and Intergroup Relations’, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1866–1880, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00130.x.
[17]
J. Vogt, J. De Houwer, and G. Crombez, ‘Multiple Goal Management Starts With Attention’, Experimental Psychology, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 55–61, May 2011, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000066.
[18]
J. Vogt, J. De Houwer, G. Crombez, and S. Van Damme, ‘Competing for attentional priority: Temporary goals versus threats.’, Emotion, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 587–598, 2013, doi: 10.1037/a0027204.
[19]
K. D. Vohs, ‘Money priming can change people’s thoughts, feelings, motivations, and behaviors: An update on 10 years of experiments.’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 144, no. 4, pp. e86–e93, 2015, doi: 10.1037/xge0000091.