1.
Moskowitz, G.B.: Social cognition: understanding self and others. Guilford Press, New York (2005).
2.
Todorov, A., Olivola, C.Y., Dotsch, R., Mende-Siedlecki, P.: Social Attributions from Faces: Determinants, Consequences, Accuracy, and Functional Significance. Annual Review of Psychology. 66, 519–545 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831.
3.
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review. 114, 864–886 (2007).
4.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C.K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., Cacioppo, J.T.: Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 99, 410–435 (2010).
5.
Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., Takala, T.: A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Frontiers in Psychology. 6, (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00390.
6.
MacDorman, K.F., Ishiguro, H.: The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies. 7, 297–337 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.03mac.
7.
Wang, S., Lilienfeld, S.O., Rochat, P.: The uncanny valley: Existence and explanations. Review of General Psychology. 19, 393–407 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000056.
8.
Coeckelbergh, M.: Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception, and performance of artificial agents. AI & SOCIETY. 24, 181–189 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0208-3.
9.
Gray, K., Waytz, A., Young, L.: The Moral Dyad: A Fundamental Template Unifying Moral Judgment. Psychological Inquiry. 23, 206–215 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.686247.
10.
Gray, K., Young, L., Waytz, A.: Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality. Psychological Inquiry. 23, 101–124 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.651387.
11.
Merritt, A.C., Effron, D.A., Monin, B.: Moral Self-Licensing: When Being Good Frees Us to Be Bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 4, 344–357 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00263.x.
12.
Hilton, J.L., von Hippel, W.: STEREOTYPES. Annual Review of Psychology. 47, 237–271 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.237.
13.
Kunda, Z., Spencer, S.J.: When do stereotypes come to mind and when do they color judgment? A goal-based theoretical framework for stereotype activation and application. Psychological Bulletin. 129, 522–544 (2003).
14.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., Willis, H.: Intergroup Bias. Annual Review of Psychology. 53, 575–604 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135109.
15.
Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., Kashima, Y., Bain, P.: Attributing and denying humanness to others. European Review of Social Psychology. 19, 55–85 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280801981645.
16.
Mackie, D.M., Smith, E.R., Ray, D.G.: Intergroup Emotions and Intergroup Relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2, 1866–1880 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00130.x.
17.
Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Crombez, G.: Multiple Goal Management Starts With Attention. Experimental Psychology. 58, 55–61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000066.
18.
Vogt, J., De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Van Damme, S.: Competing for attentional priority: Temporary goals versus threats. Emotion. 13, 587–598 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027204.
19.
Vohs, K.D.: Money priming can change people’s thoughts, feelings, motivations, and behaviors: An update on 10 years of experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 144, e86–e93 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000091.
