[1]
V. Buchli, ‘Architecture and the domestic sphere’, in The material culture reader, Oxford: Berg, 2002, pp. 207–213 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=78a78b63-2b8c-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[2]
Victor Buchli, Alison Clarke, and Dell Upton, ‘Editorial’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053590.
[3]
J. Rykwert, ‘Positive and arbitrary’, in On Adam’s house in Paradise: the idea of the primitive hut in architectural history, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981, pp. 43–74 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4ee15865-dee4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[4]
L. H. Morgan and P. Bohannan, ‘Houses of Indian Tribes North of New Mexico’, in Houses and house-life of the American aborigines, 1st Phoenix ed., vol. Classics in anthropology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965, pp. 104–139 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c97aaa3f-2d8c-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[5]
A. Rapoport, ‘The Nature and Definition of the Field’, in House form and culture, vol. Foundations of cultural geography series, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969, pp. 1–17 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c8c6b3b8-1218-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[6]
Amos Rapoport, ‘A Look at the Present’, in House form and culture, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969, pp. 126–135.
[7]
Steiner, C, ‘Travel engravings and the construction of the primitive’, in Prehistories of the future: the primitivist project and the culture of modernism, vol. Cultural sitings, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1995, pp. 202–225.
[8]
Benjamin, Walter and Tiedemann, Rolf, The arcades project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 2002.
[9]
V. Buchli, ‘Constructing Utopian Sexualities: the Archaeology and Architecture of the Early Soviet State’, in Archaeologies of sexuality, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 236–252.
[10]
Laugier, Marc-Antoine and Hermann, Wolfgang, An essay on architecture, vol. Documents and sources in architecture. Los Angeles: Hennessey & Ingalls, 1977.
[11]
Semper, Gottfried, The four elements of architecture and other writings, vol. RES monographs in anthropology and aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
[12]
Vogt, Adolf Max, Le Corbusier, and Donnell, Radka, Le Corbusier, the noble savage: toward an archaeology of modernism. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1998.
[13]
F. Engels, The origin of the family, private property, and the state. New York: Pathfinder Press, 1972 [Online]. Available: https://soth.alexanderstreet.com/cgi-bin/SOTH/hub.py?type=document_details&browse=all&sourceid=S10020698&sortorder=docid
[14]
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Cole, G. D. H., Brumfitt, J. H., and Hall, John C., The social contract; and, Discourses, vol. Everyman’s library. London: Dent, 1973.
[15]
Hvattum, Mari, Gottfried Semper and the problem of historicism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[16]
Morgan, Lewis Henry and Tooker, Elisabeth, Ancient society, vol. Classics of anthropology. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1985.
[17]
G. Teyssot, ‘A Topology of Thresholds’, Home Cultures, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 89–116, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.2752/174063105778053427.
[18]
Hayden, Dolores, The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981.
[19]
G F Klemm, Allgemeine Kulturgeschichte der Menschheit, vols. 1-9. 1843.
[20]
Vitruvius Pollio, Rowland, Ingrid D., Howe, Thomas Noble, and Dewar, Michael, Ten books on architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[21]
Stocking, George W., Victorian anthropology. New York: Maxwell Macmillan, 1987.
[22]
Zola, Émile, Mitterand, Henri, and Lanoux, Armand, Les Rougon-Macquart: histoire naturelle et sociale d’une famille sous le second Empire, vol. Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. [Paris]: Gallimard, 1960.
[23]
Zola, Émile, Sctrick, Robert, and Aziza, Claude, Au bonheur des dames, vol. Pocket classiques. Paris: Pocket, 1998.
[24]
Émile Zola and Brian Nelson, The ladies’ paradise. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[25]
Deleuze, Gilles and Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. London: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
[26]
Edgar, Allen, Poe, ‘The Philosophy of Furniture’, in The fall of the house of Usher & other writings: poems, tales, essays and reviews, vol. Penguin classics, London: Penguin, 2003, pp. 364–370.
[27]
Foucault, Michel, The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences, vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge, 2002.
[28]
C. Rice, ‘Rethinking histories of the interior’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 275–287, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1080/13602360412331296107.
[29]
D. Periton, ‘The “Coupe Anatomique”: sections through the nineteenth century Parisian apartment block’, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 289–304, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1080/13602360412331296116.
[30]
Nabokov, Peter and Easton, Robert, Native American architecture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
[31]
R. H. Lowie, ‘The material culture of the Crow Indians’, Anthropological papers of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 201–270, 1922.
[32]
Mindeleff, Victor, Nabokov, Peter, and Mindeleff, Cosmos, A study of Pueblo architecture in Tusayan and Cibola, vol. Classics of Smithsonian anthropology. London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1989.
[33]
Fustel de Coulanges, The ancient city: a study on the religion, laws, and institutions of Greece and Rome. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980.
[34]
O. M. Abadia, ‘Art, crafts and Paleolithic art’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 119–141, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1469605306060571.
[35]
M. Fotiadis, ‘Factual claims in late nineteenth century European prehistory and the descent of a modern discipline’s ideology’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–27, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1469605306060559.
[36]
Hall, Edward Twitchell, ‘Space speak’, in The silent language, [1st ed.]., Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1959, pp. 187–210.
[37]
Henry, Glassie, ‘Reason in architecture’, in Folk housing in middle Virginia: a structural analysis of historic artifacts, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1975, pp. 114–175.
[38]
Paul Bohannan, ‘Introduction’, in Houses and house-life of the American aborigines, 1st Phoenix ed., vol. Classics in anthropology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965, p. V–XXI.
[39]
Oliver, Paul, Shelter in Africa. London: Barrie and Jenkins, 1976.
[40]
Oliver, Paul, Shelter, sign and symbol. London: Barrie and Jenkins, 1975.
[41]
Oliver, Paul, Dwellings: the house across the world. Oxford: Phaidon, 1987.
[42]
Rapoport, Amos, House form and culture, vol. Foundations of cultural geography series. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.
[43]
Rapoport, Amos, The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.
[44]
Forde, Cyril Daryll, Habitat, economy and society: a geographical introduction to ethnology, vol. University paperbacks. London: Methuen, 1963.
[45]
Hall, Edward Twitchell, The silent language, [1st ed.]. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1959.
[46]
Goffman, Erving and Berger, Bennett M., Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986.
[47]
Deetz, James, In small things forgotten: an archaeology of early American life, Rev. and Expanded ed. London: Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1996.
[48]
Chomsky, Noam, Language and mind, Enlarged ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.
[49]
Piaget, Jean and Maschler, Chaninah, Structuralism. London: Routledge and K. Paul, 1971.
[50]
Saussure, Ferdinand de, Bally, Charles, Riedlinger, Albert, Baskin, Wade, Culler, Jonathan D., and Sechehaye, Albert, Course in general linguistics, Revised ed. London: Owen, 1974.
[51]
Alexander, Christopher, Ishikawa, Sara, and Silverstein, Murray, A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
[52]
Stocking, George W., After Tylor: British social anthropology, 1888-1951. Madison,Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press : London : Athlone Press, 1995.
[53]
Malinowski, Bronislaw, Argonauts of the Western Pacific: an account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. 1961.
[54]
Chombart de Lauwe, P., Famille et habitation. 1959.
[55]
Rudofsky, Bernard and Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.), Architecture without architects: a short introduction to non-pedigreed architecture. London: Academy Editions, 1964.
[56]
Griaule, M. and G. Dieterlen, ‘The dogon of the French Sudan’, in African worlds: studies in the cosmological ideas and social values of African peoples, London: Published for the International African Institute by the Oxford University Press, 1954, pp. 83–110.
[57]
J. P. Lebeuf, L’habitation des Fali. 1961.
[58]
S. Kent, ‘A cross-cultural study of segmentation, architecture, and the use of space’, in Domestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990, pp. 127–152 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=333d70c2-64e6-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[59]
I. Hodder, ‘Architecture and Meaning: The Example of Neolithic Houses and Tombs’, in Architecture and order: approaches to social space, vol. Material cultures, C. Richards and M. Parker Pearson, Eds. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 73–86 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=41b86ce0-d518-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[60]
D. Boric, ‘“Deep time” metaphor: Mnemonic and apotropaic practices at Lepenski Vir’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–74, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1177/1469605303003001098.
[61]
M. Parker Pearson and C. Richards, Architecture and order: approaches to social space. London: Routledge, 1994.
[62]
Hillier, Bill and Hanson, Julienne, The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
[63]
Kent, Susan, Analyzing activity areas: an ethnoarchaeological study of the use of space, 1st ed. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1984.
[64]
Matthew. H. Johnson, ‘Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 189–211, Jun. 1989, doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X.
[65]
Johnson, Matthew, Housing culture: traditional architecture in English landscape. Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press, 1993.
[66]
S. Kus, ‘Matters material and ideal’, in Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I. Hodder, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 47–62 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511558252A013/type/book_part
[67]
S, Kus, ‘Matters material and ideal’, in Symbolic and structural archaeology, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 42–62.
[68]
Kent, Susan, Domestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study, vol. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[69]
Leone, Mark P. and Potter, Parker B., The recovery of meaning: historical archaeology in the eastern United States, vol. Anthropological Society of Washington series. London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1988.
[70]
McGuire, Randall H, ‘Building Power in the Cultural Landscape of Broome County, New York, 1880-1940’, in The archaeology of inequality, vol. Social archaeology, Oxford: Blackwell, 1991, pp. 102–124.
[71]
Samson, Ross, The social archaeology of houses. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1990.
[72]
T. Yates, ‘Habitus and Social Space: some suggestions about meaning in the Saami (Lapp) tent ca. 1700-1900’, in The meanings of things: material culture and symbolic expression, vol. One world archaeology, London: Routledge, 1989, pp. 249–262.
[73]
Joyce, Rosemary A., Beyond kinship: social and material reproduction in house societies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000.
[74]
M. Shanks, ‘Three Rooms: Archaeology and Performance’, Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 147–180, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1177/1469605304041073.
[75]
Buchli, Victor, Lucas, Gavin, ‘The Archaeology of Alienation: a late twentieth-century British Council Flat’, in Archaeologies of the contemporary past, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 158–168.
[76]
V, Buchli, ‘Material culture: current problems’, in A companion to social archaeology, vol. Social archaeology, Malden, MA.: Blackwell Pub. Ltd, 2004, pp. 179–194.
[77]
Preziosi, Donald, Minoan architectural design: formation and signification, vol. Approaches to semiotics. Berlin: Mouton, 1983.
[78]
Ingold, Tim, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge, 2000.
[79]
L.W, Donley, ‘House Power: Swahili space and symbolic markers’, in Symbolic and structural archaeology, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 63–73.
[80]
Ucko, Peter J., Tringham, Ruth, Dimbleby, G. W., Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects, and University of London, Man, settlement and urbanism: proceedings of a meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. London: Duckworth, 1972.
[81]
Gero, Joan M. and Conkey, Margaret Wright, Engendering archaeology: women and prehistory, vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
[82]
C. Lévi-Strauss, ‘The social organization of the Kwakiutl’, in The way of the masks, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1982, pp. 163–187.
[83]
J. Carsten, ‘Houses in Langkawi: stable structures or mobile homes?’, in About the House, J. Carsten and S. Hugh-Jones, Eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 105–128 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511607653A012
[84]
C. Humphrey, ‘Inside a Mongolian tent’, New Society, vol. 30 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1307088865/fulltext/837483BFD964350PQ/1?accountid=14511
[85]
Keane, Webb, Christian moderns: freedom and fetish in the mission encounter, vol. The anthropology of Christianity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
[86]
C. Lévi-Strauss, ‘Do Dual Organizations Exist?’, in Social Theory, vol. 1, pp. 132–162 [Online]. Available: https://soth.alexanderstreet.com/cgi-bin/SOTH/hub.py?type=document_details&browse=all&sourceid=S10021413&sortorder=docid
[87]
C. Lévi-Strauss, C. Jacobson, and B. G. Schoepf, Structural anthropology. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.
[88]
J. Carsten, After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511800382
[89]
J. Carsten, After kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
[90]
Hénaff, Marcel, Claude Lévi-Strauss and the making of structural anthropology. London: University of Minnesota Press, 1998.
[91]
Pierre, Bourdieu, ‘Appendix: The Kabyle House or the world reversed’, in The logic of practice, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990, pp. 271–283.
[92]
Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Weightman, John, and Weightman, Doreen, Tristes tropiques. London: Penguin, 1992.
[93]
Cieraad, Irene, At home: an anthropology of domestic space, vol. Space, place, and society. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1999.
[94]
C. Evans and C. Humphrey, ‘After-Lives of the Mongolian Yurt: The “Archaeology” of a Chinese Tourist Camp’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 189–210, Jul. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1359183502007002639.
[95]
C. Humphrey, ‘No Place Like Home in Anthropology: The Neglect of Architecture’, Anthropology Today, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–18, 1988.
[96]
Low, Setha M., Theorizing the city: the new urban anthropology reader. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1999.
[97]
Broch-Due, Vigdis, ‘Making meaning out of matter: perceptions of sex, gender and bodies among the Turakana’, in Carved flesh/cast selves: gendered symbols and social practices, vol. Cross-cultural perspectives on women, Oxford: BERG, 1993, pp. 53–82.
[98]
G. Weszkalnys, ‘A Robust Square: Planning, Youth Work, and the Making of Public Space in Post-Unification Berlin’, City & Society, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 251–274, Dec. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-744X.2008.00019.x.
[99]
V. Amit and N. Rapport, ‘The trouble with community’, in The trouble with community: anthropological reflections on movement, identity and collectivity, London: Pluto, 2002, pp. 42–64 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18mvnx3
[100]
E. Harms, ‘Civilizing the Wastelands’, in Luxury and Rubble: Civility and Dispossession in the New Saigon, University of California Press, pp. 27–57 [Online]. Available: http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=619251
[101]
D. Miller, ‘Behind closed doors’, in Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors, Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 1–19.
[102]
G. McCracken, ‘Homeyness’, in Interpretive consumer research, E. C. Hirschman, Ed. [London]: Association for Consumer Research, 1989, pp. 168–183.
[103]
D. Froud, ‘Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–233, 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053473.
[104]
Gullestad, M, ‘Hearth and home’, in Kitchen-table society: a case study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway, Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: Distribution in United States and Canada, Columbia University Press, 1984, pp. 85–115.
[105]
S, Chevalier, ‘From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb’, in Material cultures: why some things matter, vol. Consumption and space, London: University College London Press, 1997, pp. 47–72.
[106]
D. J. B. Young, ‘The Material Value of Color: The Estate Agent’s Tale’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053572.
[107]
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly and Rochberg-Halton, Eugene, The meaning of things: domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
[108]
Duncan, James S., Housing and identity: cross-cultural perspectives. London: Croom Helm, 1981.
[109]
L. Fox, ‘The Idea of Home in Law’, Home Cultures, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–50, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.2752/174063105778053445.
[110]
Miller, Daniel, Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[111]
Newton, Charles and Putnam, Tim, Household choices. London: Futures, 1990.
[112]
J.-S. Marcoux, ‘Body Exchanges: Material Culture, Gender and Stereotypes in the Making’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–59, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053608.
[113]
Colomina, Beatriz and Bloomer, Jennifer, Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture. New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992.
[114]
C. Cullens, ‘Gimme Shelter: At Home with the Millennium ’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 204–227, 1999.
[115]
Sanders, Joel, Stud: architectures of masculinity. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996.
[116]
Silverstone, Roger, Visions of suburbia. London: Routledge, 1997.
[117]
Spain, Daphne, Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
[118]
D. Froud, ‘Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–233, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053473.
[119]
J. Carrier, ‘The rituals of Christmas giving’, in Unwrapping Christmas, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, pp. 55–74.
[120]
M. Mauss, The gift: the form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203407448
[121]
Hayden, Dolores, The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981.
[122]
K. Fehervary, ‘American Kitchens, Luxury Bathrooms, and the Search for a “Normal” Life in Postsocialist Hungary’, Ethnos, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 369–400, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1080/0014184022000031211.
[123]
G. Valentine, ‘(Hetero)sexing space: lesbian perceptions and experiences of everyday spaces’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 395–413, 1993, doi: 10.1068/d110395.
[124]
Rosner, Victoria, Modernism and the architecture of private life, vol. Gender and culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
[125]
N. Harris, ‘Saying good-bye’, in Building lives: constructing rites and passages, London: Yale University Press, 1999, pp. 115–166.
[126]
A. Forty, ‘Introduction’, in The art of forgetting, vol. Materializing culture, A. Forty and S. Kuechler, Eds. Oxford: Berg, 1999, pp. 1–18.
[127]
R. Tringham, ‘Engendered places in prehistory’, in Interpretive archaeology: a reader, London: Leicester University Press, 2000, pp. 329–357 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781441179296
[128]
Baudrillard, Jean, ‘Requiem for the twin towers’, in The spirit of terrorism: and, Requiem for the twin towers, London: Verso, 2002, pp. 41–52.
[129]
Victor, Buchli & Gavin, Lucas, ‘The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth century British council house’, in Archaeologies of the contemporary past, London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 158–168.
[130]
Augé, Marc and Howe, John, Non-places: introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London: Verso, 1995.
[131]
M, Bloch, ‘The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafimaniry of Madagascar’, in About the house: Leví-Strauss and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 69–83.
[132]
Vidler, Anthony, The architectural uncanny: essays in the modern unhomely. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1992.
[133]
Vidler, Anthony, Warped space: art, architecture, and anxiety in modern culture. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.
[134]
G. Lucas, ‘Disposability and Dispossession in the Twentieth Century’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–22, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1359183502007001303.
[135]
J.-S. Marcoux, ‘The “Casser Maison” Ritual: Constructing the Self by Emptying the Home’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 213–235, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1177/135918350100600205.
[136]
L, Prussin, ‘When Nomads Settle’, in African material culture, vol. African systems of thought, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 73–102 [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/3980
[137]
M. Van Der Hoorn, ‘Exorcizing Remains: Architectural Fragments as Intermediaries between History and Individual Experience’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 189–213, Jul. 2003, doi: 10.1177/13591835030082004.
[138]
Virilio, Paul, Ground zero. London: Verso, 2002.
[139]
Whiteread, Rachel and Lingwood, James, House. London: Phaidon Press in association with Artangel, 1995.
[140]
M, Yampolsky. (Trans John, Kachur), ‘In the Shadow of Monuments: Notes on Iconoclasm and Time’, in Soviet hieroglyphics: visual culture in late twentieth-century Russia, Bloomington ; London: BFI Pub, 1995, pp. 93–112.
[141]
D. J. B. Young, ‘The Material Value of Color: The Estate Agent’s Tale’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053572.
[142]
V, Buchli, ‘Memory, Melancholy and Materiality’, in Archaeology and memory, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2010, pp. 204–210 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1cd0pmc.15
[143]
Huyssen, Andreas, Present pasts: urban palimpsests and the politics of memory, vol. Cultural memory in the present. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 2003.
[144]
Forty, Adrian and Küchler, Susanne, The art of forgetting, vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 1999.
[145]
Agamben, Giorgio, Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life, vol. Meridian. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1998.
[146]
Hallam, Elizabeth, Hockey, Jennifer Lorna, ‘Spaces of Death and Memory’, in Death, memory and material culture, vol. Materializing culture, Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 77–100.
[147]
A. Riegl, ‘The modern cult of monuments: its character and its origins’, Oppositions: a journal for ideas and criticism in architecture, vol. 25(Fall), pp. 21–56, 1982.
[148]
Hoffman, Susannah M. and Oliver-Smith, Anthony, Catastrophe & culture: the anthropology of disaster, vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Oxford: James Currey, 2002.
[149]
T. Edensor, ‘Waste Matter - The Debris of Industrial Ruins and the Disordering of the Material World’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–332, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1359183505057346.
[150]
Gamboni, Dario, The destruction of art: iconoclasm & vandalism since the French Revolution, vol. Picturing history. London: Reaktion, 1997.
[151]
Wigley, Mark, The architecture of deconstruction: Derrida’s haunt. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1993.
[152]
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix, A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum, 2004.
[153]
Edensor, Tim, Industrial ruins: spaces, aesthetics, and materiality. Oxford: Berg, 2005.
[154]
V. Buchli, ‘Leninism, immateriality and modernity’, in An archaeology of the immaterial, London: Routledge, 2016, pp. 132–172 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9781315714813/startPage/145/1
[155]
A. Vidler, ‘Diagrams of Diagrams: Architectural Abstraction and Modern Representation’, Representations , vol. 72, pp. 1–20, 2000.
[156]
N. Bird-David, ‘At home:Setting and Mind Setting’, in Us, relatives: scaling and plural life in a forager world, vol. 12, Oakland, California: University of California Press, 2017, pp. 39–60 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1k85cnd.7
[157]
D. Battaglia, D. Valentine, and V. Olson, ‘Relational Spaces: An Earthly Installation’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 245–256, May 2015, doi: 10.14506/ca30.2.07.
[158]
M. Heidegger, ‘The worldhood of the world’, in Being and time, Oxford: Blackwell, 1962, pp. 91–148 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3b5138c1-d018-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[159]
L. Messeri, Placing outer space: an Earthly ethnography of other worlds. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://read.dukeupress.edu/books/book/37/
