2.
Beck-Gernsheim, E. On the Way to a Post-Familial Family: From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities. Theory, Culture & Society 15, 53–70 (1998).
3.
Dewar, J. The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review 61, 467–485 (1998).
4.
Büchler, A. Islamic family law in Europe? From dichotomies to discourse – or: beyond cultural and religious identity in family law. International Journal of Law in Context 8, 196–210 (2012).
5.
Morgan, D. H. J. Family connections: an introduction to family studies. (Polity Press, 1996).
6.
Diduck, A. Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems 58, 235–254 (2005).
7.
Smart, C. Personal life: new directions in sociological thinking. (Polity, 2007).
8.
Fineman, M. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. (Routledge, 1995).
9.
Fineman, M. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. (New Press, 2004).
10.
Janet Finch. Displaying Families. Sociology 41, 65–81 (2007).
11.
E. Silva & C. Smart. The `New’ Practices and Politics of Family Life. in The new family? (Sage, 1999).
12.
J. Weeks. Elective Families: lesbian and gay life experiments. in Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice (Routledge, 2002).
13.
Green Paper on the Family.
15.
Carol Smart. The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody. Journal of Law and Society 18, 485–500 (1991).
16.
If only we can find the appropriate terms to use the issue will be solved’: Law, identity and parenthood. Family Law.
17.
Boyd, Susan. Motherhood and Law: Constructing and Challenging Normativity. in The Ashgate research companion to feminist legal theory (Ashgate, 2013).
18.
Esther Dermott. Linking fatherhood and motherhood. in Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis (Routledge, 2008).
19.
Diduck, Alison. Conceiving the Bad Mother: `The focus should be on the child to be born’. University of British Columbia Law Review 32, 199–226 (1998).
20.
Wallbank, J. A. Challenging motherhood(s). (Pearson Education, 2001).
21.
Lewis, J. The politics of motherhood: child and maternal welfare in England, 1900-1939. (Croom Helm, 1980).
22.
Susan B. Boyd. Child custody, law, and women’s work. (Oxford University Press, 2003).
23.
K. O’Donovan & J. Marshall. After Birth: decisions about becoming a mother. in Feminist perspectives on family law (Routledge-Cavendish, 2006).
24.
Millbank, J. The Limits of Functional Family: Lesbian Mother Litigation in the Era of the Eternal Biological Family. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 22, 149–177 (2008).
25.
Collier, R. A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices). Journal of Law and Society 28, 520–545 (2001).
26.
E. Dermott. Paradoxes of contemporary Fatherhood’. in Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis (Routledge, 2008).
27.
R Collier. Engaging Fathers? Responsibility, Law and the "Problem of Fatherhood”’. in Responsibility, law and the family (Ashgate, 2008).
28.
R Collier. Engaging Fathers, changing men? in Men, law and gender: essays on the ‘man’ of law vol. A GlassHouse book (Routledge-Cavendish, 2010).
29.
Collier, R. & Sheldon, S. Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study. (Hart, 2008).
30.
Sheldon, S. Fragmenting Fatherhood: The Regulation of Reproductive Technologies. Modern Law Review 68, 523–553 (2005).
31.
B. Neale & C. Smart. Caring, Earning and Changing. in Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice (Routledge, 2002).
32.
S. Ruddick. The idea of Fatherhood’. in Feminism and families vol. Thinking gender (Routledge, 1997).
33.
Glenda Wall and Stephanie Arnold. How Involved Is Involved Fathering?: An Exploration of the Contemporary Culture of Fatherhood. Gender and Society 21, 508–527 (2007).
34.
Gatrell, C. Whose child is it anyway? The negotiation of paternal entitlements within marriage. The Sociological Review 55, 352–372 (2007).
35.
Dermott, E. Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis. (Routledge, 2008).
36.
Research report 15 Work and care: a study of modern parents | Equality and Human Rights Commission.
37.
Working Better: Meeting the changing needs in the 21st century | Equality and Human Rights Commission.
38.
J Scott & S Dex. Paid and Unpaid Work, Can policy improve gender inequalities? in Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study (Hart Pub, 2009).
39.
Lewis, J. & Campbell, M. UK Work/Family Balance Policies and Gender Equality, 1997-2005. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 14, 4–30 (2007).
40.
LEWIS, J. Childcare Policies and the Politics of Choice. The Political Quarterly 79, 499–507 (2008).
41.
Haugen, G. M. D. Caring children: exploring care in post-divorce families. The Sociological Review 55, 653–670 (2007).
42.
James, G. Mothers and fathers as parents and workers: family-friendly employment policies in an era of shifting identities. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 31, 271–283 (2009).
43.
Allison James & Allison James. A New Paradigm for the Sociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise and Problems. in Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (RoutledgeFalmer, 1997).
44.
Tisdall, E. K. M. & Punch, S. Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies 10, 249–264 (2012).
45.
Burman, E. Deconstructing neoliberal childhood: Towards a feminist antipsychological approach. Childhood 19, 423–438 (2012).
46.
James, A. L. Competition or integration? The next step in childhood studies? Childhood 17, 485–499 (2010).
47.
Emily Buss. What the Law Should (And Should Not) Learn from Child Development Research. Hofstra Law Review 38, 13–68 (2009).
48.
Jans, M. Children as Citizens: Towards a Contemporary Notion of Child Participation. Childhood 11, 27–44 (2004).
49.
Ennew J.,. Time for Children or Time for Adults? in Childhood matters: social theory, practice and politics vol. Public policy and social welfare (Avebury, 1994).
50.
Wendy Stainton Rogers. What is a Child? in Understanding childhood: an interdisciplinary approach vol. Childhood (Wiley, 2003).
51.
Heywood, C. Centuries of Childhood: An Anniversary—and an Epitaph? The Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth 3, 341–365 (2010).
52.
Fass, P. S. The damned and the beautiful: American youth in the 1920’s. (Oxford University Press, 1979).
53.
Holt, J. C. Escape from childhood: the needs and rights of children. (Penguin, 1975).
54.
Sally Engle Merry. Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review 22, 869–896 (1988).
55.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law review 30, 375–411 (2008).
56.
Roberts, S. Against Legal Pluralism. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 30, 95–106 (1998).
57.
Sally Falk Moore. Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study. Law & Society Review 7, 719–746 (1973).
58.
Griffiths, J. What is Legal Pluralism? Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 24, 1–56 (1986).
59.
von Benda-Beckmann, F. Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 34, 37–82 (2002).
60.
Shah, P. Legal pluralism in conflict: coping with cultural diversity in law. (Glass House, 2005).
61.
Melissaris, Emmanuel. The More the Merrier? A New Take on Legal Pluralism. Social and Legal Studies 13, 57–79 (1AD).
62.
Douglas et al., G. The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce. Child and Family Law Quarterly 24, 139–156 (2012).
63.
Hirschl, Ran. Constitutional Courts vs. Religious Fundamentalism: Three Middle Eastern Tales. Texas Law Review 82, 1819–1860.
64.
Büchler, A. Islamic family law in Europe? From dichotomies to discourse – or: beyond cultural and religious identity in family law. International Journal of Law in Context 8, 196–210 (2012).
65.
Ruru, J. Indigenous Peoples and Family Law: Issues in Aotearoa/New Zealand. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 19, 327–345 (2005).
66.
Andra Nahal Behrouz. Transforming Islamic Family Law: State Responsibility and the Role of Internal Initiative. Columbia Law Review 103, 1136–1162 (2003).
67.
Marc J. Swartz. Religious Courts, Community, and Ethnicity among the Swahili of Mombasa: An Historical Study of Social Boundaries. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 49, 29–41 (1979).
68.
Muslim family law in Western courts. vol. Durham modern Middle East and Islamic world series (Routledge, 2014).
69.
Rehman, J. The Sharia, Islamic Family Laws and International Human Rights Law: Examining the Theory and Practice of Polygamy and Talaq. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21, 108–127 (2007).
70.
M. Malik. The branch on which we sit”: Multiculturalism, Minority Women and Family Law. in Feminist perspectives on family law (Routledge-Cavendish, 2006).
71.
Hashem v Shayif & Anor [2008] EWHC 2380 (Fam) (22 September 2008).
72.
Murphy, J. Ethnic minorities, their families and the law. (Hart, 2000).
73.
Sen, A. Identity and violence: the illusion of destiny. (Penguin, 2007).
74.
Eekelaar, J. Family Law and Personal Life. (Oxford University Press, 2007). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001.
75.
Maclean, M. & Eekelaar, J. Managing family justice in diverse societies. vol. Oñati international series in law and society (Hart Publishing, 2013).
76.
Witte, J. From sacrament to contract: marriage, religion, and law in the Western tradition. (2012).
77.
Nichols, J. A. Marriage and divorce in a multicultural context: multi-tiered marriage and the boundaries of civil law and religion. (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
78.
The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women.
79.
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
80.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
81.
Convention on the Rights of the Child.
82.
European Convention on Human Rights - Convention.
83.
Stark, Barbara. When Globalization Hits Home: International Family Law Comes of Age. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1551–1604 (2006).
84.
JANET HALLEY and KERRY RITTICH. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law: Genealogies and Contemporary Studies of Family Law Exceptionalism. The American Journal of Comparative Law 58, 753–775 (2010).
85.
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright. Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law 85, 613–645 (1991).
86.
Rose, N. Beyond the Public/Private Division: Law, Power and the Family. Journal of Law and Society 14, (1987).
87.
Jane Liddy. The concept of family life under the ECHR. European Human Rights Law Review (1998).
88.
Eekelaar, J. & Maclean, M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. (Hart Publishing, 2013).
89.
Eva Brems. A Noble Cause: A Case Study of Discrimination, Symbols and Reciprocity. in Diversity and European human rights: rewriting judgments of the ECHR (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
90.
Estin, Ann Loquer. Family Law, Pluralism, and Human Rights. Emory International Law Review 25, 811–829 (2011).
91.
Durrant, J. Legal reform and attitudes toward physical punishment in Sweden. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 11, 147–173 (2003).
92.
Rogerson, P. & Collier, J. G. Collier’s conflict of laws. (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
93.
Briggs, A. The conflict of laws. vol. Clarendon law series (Oxford University Press, 2013).
94.
Büchler, A. Islamic family law in Europe? From dichotomies to discourse – or: beyond cultural and religious identity in family law. International Journal of Law in Context 8, 196–210 (2012).
95.
CASE OF ŞERİFE YİĞİT v. TURKEY (Application no. 3976/05).
96.
Foblets M.-Cl. Migrant Women Caught between Islamic Family Law and Women’s Rights: the Search for the Appropriate ‘Connecting Factor’ in International Family Law. in The multi-cultural family vol. The family, law&society (Ashgate, 2008).
97.
Foblets, Marie-Claire. Migrant Women Caught between Islamic Family Law and Women’s Rights. The Search for the Appropriate ’Connecting Factor. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 7, 11–34 (2000).
98.
Dukali v Lamrani [2012] EWHC 1748 (Fam) (15 March 2012).
99.
Hyde v. Hyde and Woodmansee.
100.
Family Law Week: Holliday v Musa [2010] EWCA Civ 335.
101.
Kymlicka, W. Multicultural citizenship within multination states. Ethnicities 11, 281–302 (2011).
102.
Comparative Law as Transnational Law. (Oxford University Press, 2011). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795208.001.0001.
103.
Twining, W. General jurisprudence: understanding law from a global perspective. vol. Law in context (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
104.
Nabi v Heaton (Inspector of Taxes) - [1981] STC 375.
105.
Fawcett, J. J., Carruthers, J. M. & North, P. M. Cheshire, North & Fawcett: private international law. (Oxford University Press, 2008).
106.
Marella, M. R. The Non-Subversive Function of European Private Law: The Case of Harmonisation of Family Law. European Law Journal 12, 78–105 (2006).
107.
David Bradley. A Family Law for Europe? Sovereignty, Political Economy and Legitimation. : Global Jurist Frontiers.
108.
Aude Fiorini. The Codification of Private International Law in Europe - Could the Community Learn from the Experience of Mixed Jurisdictions. Tulane European and civil law forum 23, 89–110 (2008).
109.
Legrand, P. European Legal Systems are not Converging. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 45, (1996).
110.
Wilkinson v Kitzinger and Another (Same-sex marriage) - (2006) Times, 21 August.
111.
Borg-Barthet, J. The Principled Imperative to Recognise Same-Sex Unions in the EU. Journal of Private International Law 8, 359–388 (2012).
112.
Peter McEleavy. The Brussels II Regulation: How the European Community Has Moved into Family Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51, 883–908 (2002).
113.
ENGLAND Paula. Separative and Soluble Selves. Dichotomous Thinking in Economics. in Feminism confronts homo economicus: gender, law, and society (Cornell University Press, 2005).
114.
G. Straetmans. Non economic free movement of EU citizens and family law matters. in International family law for the European Union (Intersentia, 2007).
115.
Martin, C. The Pacs and marriage and cohabitation in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15, 135–158 (2001).
116.
Millbank, Jenni. The role of the "functional family” in same-sex family recognition trends. Child and family law quarterly 20, 155–182 (2008).
117.
C. Stychin. Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship. in Feminist perspectives on family law (Routledge-Cavendish, 2006).
118.
Richards, C. The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples—The French Perspective. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 51, (2002).
119.
CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 30141/04).
120.
Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam).
121.
Adam, B. D. Care, Intimacy and Same-Sex Partnership in the 21st Century. Current Sociology 52, 265–279 (2004).
122.
PARKER, S. THE MARRIAGE ACT 1753: A CASE STUDY IN FAMILY LAW-MAKING. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’ 1, 133–154 (1987).
123.
JDiduck, A. A Family by any other Name ... or StarbucksTM comes to England. Journal of Law and Society 28, 290–310 (2001).
124.
Wright, W. K. The Tide in Favour of Equality: Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 20, 249–285 (2006).
125.
Fineman, M. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. (New Press, 2004).
126.
Murphy, John. Same-Sex Marriage in England: A Role for Human Rights? Child and Family Law Quarterly 16, 245–260 (2004).
127.
Kofman, E. Gendered Global Migrations. International Feminist Journal of Politics 6, 643–665 (2004).
128.
Skrbiš, Z. Transnational Families: Theorising Migration, Emotions and Belonging. Journal of Intercultural Studies 29, 231–246 (2008).
129.
Ruth Zafran. Children’s Rights as Relational Rights: The Case of Relocation. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 18, 163–218 (2009).
130.
Ehrenreich, B. & Hochschild, A. R. Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. (Granta Books, 2003).
131.
Ronen, Y. The ties that bind: family and private life as bars to the deportation of immigrants. International Journal of Law in Context 8, 283–296 (2012).
132.
Choudhry, Shazia. Adoption and Children Act 2002, the Welfare Principle and the Human Rights Act 1998 - A Missed Opportunity. Child and Family Law Quarterly 15, 119–138 (2003).
133.
Dey, I. Adapting Adoption: A Case of Closet Politics? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 19, 289–309 (2005).
134.
Dowling, M. & Brown, G. Globalization and international adoption from China. Child & Family Social Work 14, 352–361 (2009).
135.
Eekelaar, J. CHILDREN BETWEEN CULTURES. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 18, 178–194 (2004).
136.
Harris-Short, S. Making and Breaking Family Life: Adoption, the State, and Human Rights. Journal of Law and Society 35, 28–51 (2008).
137.
Ishaque, S. Islamic Principles On Adoption: Examining The Impact Of Illegitimacy And Inheritance Related Concerns In Context Of A Child’S Right To An Identity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 22, 393–420 (2008).
138.
Lewis, J. ADOPTION: THE NATURE OF POLICY SHIFTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES, 1972-2002. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 18, 235–255 (2004).
139.
Lind, J. & Johansson, S. Preservation of the Child’s Background in In- and Intercountry Adoption. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 17, 235–260 (2009).
140.
Mezmur, B. D. From Angelina (To Madonna) to Zoe’s ark: What are the ‘A-Z’ Lessons for Intercountry Adoptions in Africa? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23, 145–173 (2009).
141.
Palmer, Michael. Rethinking Children’s Rights and Interests: Economic Reform, Social Protection and Legal Culture in Post-Mao China. Journal of Comparative Law 5, (2010).
142.
Roby, Jini L. From Rhetoric to Best Practice: Children’s Rights in Intercountry Adoption. Children’s Legal Rights Journal 27, (2007).
143.
Tobin, J. & Mcnair, R. Public International Law and the Regulation of Private Spaces: Does The Convention on the Rights of the Child Impose an Obligation on States to Allow Gay and Lesbian Couples to Adopt? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23, 110–131 (2009).
144.
ECJ 04.10.1991 C-159/90 Judgment of the Court of 4 October 1991. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Ltd v Stephen Grogan and others. (4AD).
145.
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood - [1997] 2 All ER 687.
146.
A, B AND C v. IRELAND - 25579/05 [2010] ECHR 2032 (16 December 2010).
147.
de Londras, F. & Dzehtsiarou, K. II. GRAND CHAMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, A, B & C v IRELAND, DECISION OF 17 DECEMBER 2010. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 62, 250–262 (2013).
148.
M. Hunter-Henin. Surrogacy: Is there Room for a New Liberty Between the French Prohibitive Position And the English Ambivalence? in Law and Bioethics (Oxford University Press, 2008). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545520.001.0001.
149.
Diarmuid Rossa Phelan. Right to Life of the Unborn v Promotion of Trade in Services: The European Court of Justice and the Normative Shaping of the European Union. The Modern Law Review 55, 670–689 (1992).
150.
Morgan, D. & Lee, R. G. In the Name of the Father? Ex parte Blood: Dealing with Novelty and Anomaly. Modern Law Review 60, 840–856 (1997).
151.
Hervey, T. Buy baby: the European union and regulation of human reproduction. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18, 207–234 (1998).
152.
Margaret Jane Radin. Market-Inalienability. Harvard Law Review 100, 1849–1937 (1987).
153.
Evans v United Kingdom (Application 6339/05) (2007) 46 EHRR 728, [2007] 2 FCR 5. Court: European Court of Human Rights.
154.
Evans v United Kingdom (Application 6339/05) (2007) 46 EHRR 728, [2007] 2 FCR 5. Court: European Court of Human Rights.
155.
Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 727, [2005] Fam 1. Court: Court of Appeal.
156.
Sheldon, Sally. Evans v Amicus Healthcare; Hadley v Midland Fertility Services - Revealing Cracks in the Twin Pillars. Child and Family Law Quarterly 16, (2004).
157.
Freeman, M. Rethinking Gillick. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 13, 201–218 (2005).
158.
Tobin, J. The International Obligation to Abolish Traditional Practices Harmful to Children’s Health: What Does It Mean and Require of States? Human Rights Law Review 9, 373–396 (2009).
159.
Lewis, Hope. Between Irua and Female Genital Mutilation: Feminist Human Rights Discourse and the Cultural Divide. Harvard human rights journal 8, (1995).
160.
Kristiansen, M. & Sheikh, A. Legislation on male infant circumcision in Europe: a call to avoid paternalism and to promote evidence-based, patient-centred care. Global Discourse 3, 342–347 (2013).
161.
DeLaet, D. L. Genital Autonomy, Children’s Rights, and Competing Rights Claims in International Human Rights Law *. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 20, 554–583 (2012).
162.
SS (Malaysia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 888 (18 July 2013).
163.
Female genital mutilation/cutting | Child protection from violence, exploitation and abuse | UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/protection/57929_58002.html.
164.
Bluebond-Langner, M. The private worlds of dying children. (Princeton University Press, 1978).
165.
Harris-Short, S. International Human Rights Law: Imperialist, Inept and Ineffective? Cultural Relativism and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Human Rights Quarterly 25, 130–181 (2003).
166.
Sabatello, M. Children’s bioethics: the international biopolitical discourse on harmful traditional practices and the right of the child to cultural identity. (Martinus Nijhoff, 2009).
167.
House of Lords - Regina v. Secretary of State for Education and Employment and others (Respondents) ex parte Williamson (Appellant) and others.
168.
House of Lords - R (on the application of Begum (by her litigation friend, Rahman)) (Respondent) v. Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School (Appellants).
169.
Chamber judgments Dogru v. France and Kervanci v. France 4.12.08.
170.
Peter Cumper. Religious Education in Europe in the Twenty-First Century. in Law, religious freedoms and education in Europe vol. Cultural diversity and law (Ashgate, 2011).
171.
Eric Barendt. Teaching Evolution, Creationism and Intelligent design in US Schools (with Some European Comparisons). in Law, religious freedoms and education in Europe vol. Cultural diversity and law (Ashgate, 2011).
172.
Ahdar, R. & Leigh, I. Religious Freedom in the Liberal State. (Oxford University Press, 2013). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606474.001.0001.
173.
Eanmonn Callan. Discrimination and Religious Schooling. in Citizenship in diverse societies / edited by Will Kymlicka and Wayne Norman.
174.
Evans, C. Religious Education in Public Schools: An International Human Rights Perspective. Human Rights Law Review 8, 449–473 (2008).
175.
Joel Feinberg. The Child’s right to an open future. in Whose child?: Children’s rights, parental authority, and state power vol. A Littlefield, Adams quality paperback (Rowman and Littlefield, 1980).
176.
I. Leigh. Objective, Critical and Pluralistic? Religious education & Human Rights in the Public Sphere. in Law, state and religion in the new Europe: debates and dilemmas (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
177.
Temperman, J. The Lautsi papers: multidisciplinary reflections on religious symbols in the public school classroom. vol. Studies in religion, secular beliefs and human rights (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012).
178.
Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
179.
Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003.
180.
RE J (CHILD RETURNED ABROAD: CONVENTION RIGHTS) [2005] UKHL 40.
181.
E (Children), Re [2011] UKSC 27 (10 June 2011) Re E (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27, [2012] 1 AC 144.
182.
Re LC (Children) (International Abduction: Child’s Objections to Return) [2014] UKSC 1, [2014] 2 W.L.R. 124.
183.
Nigel Lowe. A Supra-National Approach to Interpreting the 1980 Hague Convention – a Tale of Two European Courts’ [2012]. International Family Law 48, 170–179.
184.
Ruth Lamont. Child Abduction in the European Union: Recognizing and Regulating Care and Migration. in Regulating family responsibilities (Ashgate, 2011).
185.
Schuz, R. Hague child abduction convention: a critical analysis. vol. Studies in private international law (Hart Pub, 2013).
186.
Re K (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2014] UKSC 29.
187.
A (Children), Re (Rev 1) [2013] UKSC 60 (09 September 2013).
188.
Schuz, R. Hague child abduction convention: a critical analysis. vol. Studies in private international law (Hart Pub, 2013).
189.
Trimmings, K. Child abduction within the European Union. vol. Studies in private international law (Hart Publishing, 2013).
190.
Stalford, H. Children and the European Union: rights, welfare and accountability. vol. Modern studies in European law (Hart, 2012).
191.
Operating the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention:The 2008 Statistics.
192.
P v P [2001] EWCA Civ 166 (13 February 2001).
193.
MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793 (07 July 2011). in.
194.
D v S [2001] NZCA 374; [2002] NZFLR 116; (2001) 21 FRNZ 331 (4 December 2001).
195.
George, R. H. Relocation disputes: law and practice in England and New Zealand. (Hart Publishing, 2014).
196.
George, R. The international relocation debate. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 34, 141–152 (2012).
197.
Jonathan Herring & Rachel Taylor. Relocating Relocation. Child and Family Law Quarterly 18, 517–537 (2006).
198.
Parkinson, Patrick. Freedom of Movement in an Era of Shared Parenting: The Differences in Judicial Approaches to Relocation. Federal Law Review 36, 145–172 (2008).
199.
AR (A Child: Relocation), Re [2010] EWHC 1346 (Fam) (10 June 2010).
200.
K v B (Kacem v Bashir) — Courts of New Zealand.
201.
George, R. H. Relocation disputes: law and practice in England and New Zealand. (Hart Publishing, 2014).
202.
Nicholas Bala & Andrea Wheeler. Canadian Relocation Cases: Heading Towards Guidelines. (2012).
203.
Hayes, M. Relocation cases: is the Court of Appeal applying the correct principles? Child and Family Law Quarterly 18,.
204.
Henaghan, M. Relocation cases – the rhetoric and the reality of a child’s best interests – a view from the bottom of the world. Child and Family Law Quarterly 23, 153–274 (2011).
205.
Lamont, R. Free movement of persons, child abduction and relocation within the European Union. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 34, 231–244 (2012).
