2
Beck-Gernsheim E. On the Way to a Post-Familial Family: From a Community of Need to Elective Affinities. Theory, Culture & Society 1998;15:53–70. doi:10.1177/0263276498015003004
3
Dewar J. The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review 1998;61:467–85. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00157
4
Büchler A. Islamic family law in Europe? From dichotomies to discourse – or: beyond cultural and religious identity in family law. International Journal of Law in Context 2012;8:196–210. doi:10.1017/S1744552312000043
5
Morgan DHJ. Family connections: an introduction to family studies. Cambridge, UK: : Polity Press 1996.
6
Diduck A. Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems 2005;58:235–54. doi:10.1093/clp/58.1.235
7
Smart C. Personal life: new directions in sociological thinking. Cambridge: : Polity 2007.
8
Fineman M. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: : Routledge 1995.
9
Fineman M. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: : New Press 2004.
10
Janet Finch. Displaying Families. Sociology 2007;41:65–81.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42856961
11
E. Silva, C. Smart. The `New’ Practices and Politics of Family Life. In: The new family? London: : Sage 1999.
12
J. Weeks. Elective Families: lesbian and gay life experiments. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.
13
Green Paper on the Family. http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/green-paper-on-the-family
14
Family Law Online. https://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_06_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_06_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_06_3
15
Carol Smart. The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody. Journal of Law and Society 1991;18:485–500.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/1410322?origin=crossref
16
If only we can find the appropriate terms to use the issue will be solved’: Law, identity and parenthood. Family Lawhttp://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_12_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_12_3&inner_id=&tid=7d179daf-e906-4718-81cb-857cf78cc6b1&query=%252B%2522If%2520only%2520we%2520can%2520find%2520the%2520appropriate%2520terms%2520to%2520use%2520the%2520issue%2520will%2520be%2520solved%27%253A%2520Law%252C%2520identity%2520and%2520parenthood%2522%2520%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_12_3&url=/web/search.xql%3Fc%3Dt%26pub%3DFAMILYpa%26lang%3Den%26action%3Dsearch%26query%3D%252B%2522If%2520only%2520we%2520can%2520find%2520the%2520appropriate%2520terms%2520to%2520use%2520the%2520issue%2520will%2520be%2520solved%27%253A%2520Law%252C%2520identity%2520and%2520parenthood%2522%2520%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ%26scope%3D%26min%3D0%26max%3D0%26xslmode%3Dhide_excerpts%26sort%3Dcustom%3Achrono%26chunk%3D25%26qqprodname%3DQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&sid=lcSearch.runSearch1413804344662¤tQuery=%252B%2522If%2520only%2520we%2520can%2520find%2520the%2520appropriate%2520terms%2520to%2520use%2520the%2520issue%2520will%2520be%2520solved%27%253A%2520Law%252C%2520identity%2520and%2520parenthood%2522%2520%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ¤tScope=
17
Boyd, Susan. Motherhood and Law: Constructing and Challenging Normativity. In: The Ashgate research companion to feminist legal theory. Farnham%2C%20Surrey%2C%20England%20%3B%20Burlington%2C%20VT%2C%20USA: : Ashgate 2013. http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=The%20Ashgate%20Research%20Companion%20to%20Feminist%20Legal%20Theory%20&rn=1
18
Esther Dermott. Linking fatherhood and motherhood. In: Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis. Abingdon: : Routledge 2008.
19
Diduck, Alison. Conceiving the Bad Mother: `The focus should be on the child to be born’. University of British Columbia Law Review 1998;32:199–226.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ubclr32&div=13&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
20
Wallbank JA. Challenging motherhood(s). Harlow: : Pearson Education 2001.
21
Lewis J. The politics of motherhood: child and maternal welfare in England, 1900-1939. London: : Croom Helm 1980.
22
Susan B. Boyd. Child custody, law, and women’s work. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
23
K. O’Donovan, J. Marshall. After Birth: decisions about becoming a mother. In: Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2006.
24
Millbank J. The Limits of Functional Family: Lesbian Mother Litigation in the Era of the Eternal Biological Family. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2008;22:149–77. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebn001
25
Collier R. A Hard Time to Be a Father?: Reassessing the Relationship Between Law, Policy, and Family (Practices). Journal of Law and Society 2001;28:520–45. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00201
26
E. Dermott. Paradoxes of contemporary Fatherhood’. In: Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis. Abingdon: : Routledge 2008. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=788f581e-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
27
R Collier. Engaging Fathers? Responsibility, Law and the "Problem of Fatherhood”’. In: Responsibility, law and the family. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008.
28
R Collier. Engaging Fathers, changing men? In: Men, law and gender: essays on the ‘man’ of law. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2010.
29
Collier R, Sheldon S. Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study. Oxford: : Hart 2008.
30
Sheldon S. Fragmenting Fatherhood: The Regulation of Reproductive Technologies. Modern Law Review 2005;68:523–53. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2005.00550.x
31
B. Neale, C. Smart. Caring, Earning and Changing. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.
32
S. Ruddick. The idea of Fatherhood’. In: Feminism and families. New York: : Routledge 1997.
33
Glenda Wall and Stephanie Arnold. How Involved Is Involved Fathering?: An Exploration of the Contemporary Culture of Fatherhood. Gender and Society 2007;21:508–27.http://www.jstor.org/stable/27640989
34
Gatrell C. Whose child is it anyway? The negotiation of paternal entitlements within marriage. The Sociological Review 2007;55:352–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00709.x
35
Dermott E. Intimate fatherhood: a sociological analysis. Abingdon: : Routledge 2008.
36
Research report 15 Work and care: a study of modern parents | Equality and Human Rights Commission. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/publication/research-report-15-work-and-care-a-study-of-modern-parents
37
Working Better: Meeting the changing needs in the 21st century | Equality and Human Rights Commission. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/publication/working-better-meeting-changing-needs-21st-century
38
J Scott, S Dex. Paid and Unpaid Work, Can policy improve gender inequalities? In: Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274
39
Lewis J, Campbell M. UK Work/Family Balance Policies and Gender Equality, 1997-2005. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2007;14:4–30. doi:10.1093/sp/jxm005
40
LEWIS J. Childcare Policies and the Politics of Choice. The Political Quarterly 2008;79:499–507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2008.00962.x
41
Haugen GMD. Caring children: exploring care in post-divorce families. The Sociological Review 2007;55:653–70. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00743.x
42
James G. Mothers and fathers as parents and workers: family-friendly employment policies in an era of shifting identities. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2009;31:271–83. doi:10.1080/09649060903354597
43
Allison James, Allison James. A New Paradigm for the Sociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise and Problems. In: Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London, UK: : RoutledgeFalmer 1997. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f597fc54-6936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
44
Tisdall EKM, Punch S. Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s Geographies 2012;10:249–64. doi:10.1080/14733285.2012.693376
45
Burman E. Deconstructing neoliberal childhood: Towards a feminist antipsychological approach. Childhood 2012;19:423–38. doi:10.1177/0907568211430767
46
James AL. Competition or integration? The next step in childhood studies? Childhood 2010;17:485–99. doi:10.1177/0907568209350783
47
Emily Buss. What the Law Should (And Should Not) Learn from Child Development Research. Hofstra Law Review 2009;38:13–68.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hoflr38&id=15&collection=journals&index=journals/hoflr
48
Jans M. Children as Citizens: Towards a Contemporary Notion of Child Participation. Childhood 2004;11:27–44. doi:10.1177/0907568204040182
49
Ennew J.,. Time for Children or Time for Adults? In: Childhood matters: social theory, practice and politics. Aldershot: : Avebury 1994.
50
Wendy Stainton Rogers. What is a Child? In: Understanding childhood: an interdisciplinary approach. Chichester: : Wiley 2003.
51
Heywood C. Centuries of Childhood: An Anniversary—and an Epitaph? The Journal of the History of Childhood and Youth 2010;3:341–65. doi:10.1353/hcy.2010.0000
52
Fass PS. The damned and the beautiful: American youth in the 1920’s. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1979.
53
Holt JC. Escape from childhood: the needs and rights of children. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1975.
54
Sally Engle Merry. Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review 1988;22:869–96.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3053638
55
Tamanaha, Brian Z. Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global. Sydney Law review 2008;30:375–411.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sydney30&id=373&collection=journals&index=journals/sydney
56
Roberts S. Against Legal Pluralism. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1998;30:95–106. doi:10.1080/07329113.1998.10756517
57
Sally Falk Moore. Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study. Law & Society Review 1973;7:719–46.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3052967?origin=crossref
58
Griffiths, J. What is Legal Pluralism? Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1986;24:1–56.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlpul24&id=11&collection=journals&index=journals/jlpul
59
von Benda-Beckmann F. Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 2002;34:37–82. doi:10.1080/07329113.2002.10756563
60
Shah P. Legal pluralism in conflict: coping with cultural diversity in law. London: : Glass House 2005.
61
Melissaris, Emmanuel. The More the Merrier? A New Take on Legal Pluralism. Social and Legal Studies 1AD;13:57–79.https://www.swetswise.com/swoc-web/linkingDetails.html?openURL=false&issn=0964-6639&eissn=0964-6639&volume=13&issue=1&page=57
62
Douglas et al. G. The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2012;24:139–56.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_06_1&url=/web/search.xql%3Fc%3Dt%26pub%3DFAMILYpa%26lang%3Den%26action%3Dsearch%26query%3D%252B%2522The%2520Role%2520of%2520Religious%2520Tribunals%2520in%2520Regulating%2520Marriage%2520and%2520Divorce%2522%2520%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ%26scope%3D%26min%3D0%26max%3D0%26xslmode%3Dhide_excerpts%26sort%3Dcustom%3Achrono%26chunk%3D25%26qqprodname%3DQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&sid=lcSearch.runSearch1414143484547¤tQuery=%252B%2522The%2520Role%2520of%2520Religious%2520Tribunals%2520in%2520Regulating%2520Marriage%2520and%2520Divorce%2522%2520%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ¤tScope=&query=%252B%2522The%2520Role%2520of%2520Religious%2520Tribunals%2520in%2520Regulating%2520Marriage%2520and%2520Divorce%2522%2520%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&scope=&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_06_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_06_1&inner_id=&tid=9eaad4aa-7dc0-4d12-a76e-cc399cbf07ee&addHistory=true&resource=&toc=false
63
Hirschl, Ran. Constitutional Courts vs. Religious Fundamentalism: Three Middle Eastern Tales. Texas Law Review;82:1819–60.http://search.proquest.com/docview/203680245
64
Büchler A. Islamic family law in Europe? From dichotomies to discourse – or: beyond cultural and religious identity in family law. International Journal of Law in Context 2012;8:196–210. doi:10.1017/S1744552312000043
65
Ruru J. Indigenous Peoples and Family Law: Issues in Aotearoa/New Zealand. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2005;19:327–45. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebi026
66
Andra Nahal Behrouz. Transforming Islamic Family Law: State Responsibility and the Role of Internal Initiative. Columbia Law Review 2003;103:1136–62.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/1123833?origin=crossref
67
Marc J. Swartz. Religious Courts, Community, and Ethnicity among the Swahili of Mombasa: An Historical Study of Social Boundaries. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 1979;49:29–41.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1159503
68
Giunchi E, editor. Muslim family law in Western courts. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2014.
69
Rehman J. The Sharia, Islamic Family Laws and International Human Rights Law: Examining the Theory and Practice of Polygamy and Talaq. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2007;21:108–27. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebl023
70
M. Malik. The branch on which we sit”: Multiculturalism, Minority Women and Family Law. In: Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2006.
71
Hashem v Shayif & Anor [2008] EWHC 2380 (Fam) (22 September 2008). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2008/2380.html
72
Murphy J. Ethnic minorities, their families and the law. Oxford: : Hart 2000.
73
Sen A. Identity and violence: the illusion of destiny. London: : Penguin 2007.
74
Eekelaar J. Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press 2007. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001
75
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. Managing family justice in diverse societies. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
76
Witte J. From sacrament to contract: marriage, religion, and law in the Western tradition. 2nd ed. Louisville, KY: 2012.
77
Nichols JA. Marriage and divorce in a multicultural context: multi-tiered marriage and the boundaries of civil law and religion. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
78
The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/text/econvention.htm
79
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx
80
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
81
Convention on the Rights of the Child. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
82
European Convention on Human Rights - Convention. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf
83
Stark, Barbara. When Globalization Hits Home: International Family Law Comes of Age. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 2006;:1551–604.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vantl39&id=1563&collection=journals#1563
84
JANET HALLEY and KERRY RITTICH. Critical Directions in Comparative Family Law: Genealogies and Contemporary Studies of Family Law Exceptionalism. The American Journal of Comparative Law 2010;58:753–75.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25766167
85
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright. Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law 1991;85:613–45.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2203269?origin=crossref
86
Rose N. Beyond the Public/Private Division: Law, Power and the Family. Journal of Law and Society 1987;14. doi:10.2307/1410297
87
Jane Liddy. The concept of family life under the ECHR. European Human Rights Law Review 1998.
88
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
89
Eva Brems. A Noble Cause: A Case Study of Discrimination, Symbols and Reciprocity. In: Diversity and European human rights: rewriting judgments of the ECHR. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013.
90
Estin, Ann Loquer. Family Law, Pluralism, and Human Rights. Emory International Law Review 2011;25:811–29.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/emint25&id=815&collection=journals&index=journals/emint
91
Durrant J. Legal reform and attitudes toward physical punishment in Sweden. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2003;11:147–73. doi:10.1163/092755603322397241
92
Rogerson P, Collier JG. Collier’s conflict of laws. 4th ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2013. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781107255173
93
Briggs A. The conflict of laws. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
94
Büchler A. Islamic family law in Europe? From dichotomies to discourse – or: beyond cultural and religious identity in family law. International Journal of Law in Context 2012;8:196–210. doi:10.1017/S1744552312000043
95
CASE OF ŞERİFE YİĞİT v. TURKEY (Application no. 3976/05). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-101579#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-101579%22]}
96
Foblets M.-Cl. Migrant Women Caught between Islamic Family Law and Women’s Rights: the Search for the Appropriate ‘Connecting Factor’ in International Family Law. In: The multi-cultural family. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008.
97
Foblets, Marie-Claire. Migrant Women Caught between Islamic Family Law and Women’s Rights. The Search for the Appropriate ’Connecting Factor. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2000;7:11–34.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/maastje7&id=13&collection=journals&index=journals/maastje
98
Dukali v Lamrani [2012] EWHC 1748 (Fam) (15 March 2012). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2012/1748.html
99
Hyde v. Hyde and Woodmansee. http://www.uniset.ca/other/ths/LR1PD130.html
100
Family Law Week: Holliday v Musa [2010] EWCA Civ 335. http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed56141
101
Kymlicka W. Multicultural citizenship within multination states. Ethnicities 2011;11:281–302. doi:10.1177/1468796811407813
102
Miller RA, Zumbansen PC, editors. Comparative Law as Transnational Law. Oxford University Press 2011. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795208.001.0001
103
Twining W. General jurisprudence: understanding law from a global perspective. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
104
Nabi v Heaton (Inspector of Taxes) - [1981] STC 375. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4D2W-3NY0-TWP1-S0W5&csi=274713&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
105
Fawcett JJ, Carruthers JM, North PM. Cheshire, North & Fawcett: private international law. 14th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
106
Marella MR. The Non-Subversive Function of European Private Law: The Case of Harmonisation of Family Law. European Law Journal 2006;12:78–105. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0386.2006.00308.x
107
David Bradley. A Family Law for Europe? Sovereignty, Political Economy and Legitimation. : Global Jurist Frontiers. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/gj.2004.4.1/gj.2004.4.1.1121/gj.2004.4.1.1121.xml
108
Aude Fiorini. The Codification of Private International Law in Europe - Could the Community Learn from the Experience of Mixed Jurisdictions. Tulane European and civil law forum 2008;23:89–110.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/teclf23&id=91&collection=journals&index=journals/teclf
109
Legrand P. European Legal Systems are not Converging. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 1996;45. doi:10.1017/S0020589300058656
110
Wilkinson v Kitzinger and Another (Same-sex marriage) - (2006) Times, 21 August. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4MDR-DHX0-TWP1-X17J&csi=274676&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
111
Borg-Barthet J. The Principled Imperative to Recognise Same-Sex Unions in the EU. Journal of Private International Law 2012;8:359–88. doi:10.5235/JPRIVINTL.8.2.359
112
Peter McEleavy. The Brussels II Regulation: How the European Community Has Moved into Family Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2002;51:883–908.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663191
113
ENGLAND Paula. Separative and Soluble Selves. Dichotomous Thinking in Economics. In: Feminism confronts homo economicus: gender, law, and society. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 2005.
114
G. Straetmans. Non economic free movement of EU citizens and family law matters. In: International family law for the European Union. Antwerpen: : Intersentia 2007.
115
Martin C. The Pacs and marriage and cohabitation in France. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2001;15:135–58. doi:10.1093/lawfam/15.1.135
116
Millbank, Jenni. The role of the "functional family” in same-sex family recognition trends. Child and family law quarterly 2008;20:155–82.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq20&id=155&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
117
C. Stychin. Family Friendly? Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship. In: Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2006.
118
Richards C. The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples—The French Perspective. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 2002;51. doi:10.1093/iclq/51.2.305
119
CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 30141/04). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx#{%22appno%22:[%2230141/04%22],%22itemid%22:[%22001-99605%22]}
120
Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam). http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed2118
121
Adam BD. Care, Intimacy and Same-Sex Partnership in the 21st Century. Current Sociology 2004;52:265–79. doi:10.1177/0011392104041813
122
PARKER S. THE MARRIAGE ACT 1753: A CASE STUDY IN FAMILY LAW-MAKING. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’ 1987;1:133–54. doi:10.1093/lawfam/1.1.133
123
JDiduck A. A Family by any other Name ... or StarbucksTM comes to England. Journal of Law and Society 2001;28:290–310. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00190
124
Wright WK. The Tide in Favour of Equality: Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and England and Wales. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2006;20:249–85. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebl008
125
Fineman M. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: : New Press 2004.
126
Murphy, John. Same-Sex Marriage in England: A Role for Human Rights? Child and Family Law Quarterly 2004;16:245–60.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq16&id=251&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
127
Kofman E. Gendered Global Migrations. International Feminist Journal of Politics 2004;6:643–65. doi:10.1080/1461674042000283408
128
Skrbiš Z. Transnational Families: Theorising Migration, Emotions and Belonging. Journal of Intercultural Studies 2008;29:231–46. doi:10.1080/07256860802169188
129
Ruth Zafran. Children’s Rights as Relational Rights: The Case of Relocation. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 2009;18:163–218.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajgsp18&div=13&g_sent=1&collection=journals
130
Ehrenreich B, Hochschild AR. Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. London: : Granta Books 2003.
131
Ronen Y. The ties that bind: family and private life as bars to the deportation of immigrants. International Journal of Law in Context 2012;8:283–96. doi:10.1017/S1744552312000092
132
Choudhry, Shazia. Adoption and Children Act 2002, the Welfare Principle and the Human Rights Act 1998 - A Missed Opportunity. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2003;15:119–38.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq15&id=123&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
133
Dey I. Adapting Adoption: A Case of Closet Politics? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2005;19:289–309. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebi024
134
Dowling M, Brown G. Globalization and international adoption from China. Child & Family Social Work 2009;14:352–61. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00607.x
135
Eekelaar J. CHILDREN BETWEEN CULTURES. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2004;18:178–94. doi:10.1093/lawfam/18.2.178
136
Harris-Short S. Making and Breaking Family Life: Adoption, the State, and Human Rights. Journal of Law and Society 2008;35:28–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00413.x
137
Ishaque S. Islamic Principles On Adoption: Examining The Impact Of Illegitimacy And Inheritance Related Concerns In Context Of A Child’S Right To An Identity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2008;22:393–420. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebn009
138
Lewis J. ADOPTION: THE NATURE OF POLICY SHIFTS IN ENGLAND AND WALES, 1972-2002. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2004;18:235–55. doi:10.1093/lawfam/18.2.235
139
Lind J, Johansson S. Preservation of the Child’s Background in In- and Intercountry Adoption. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2009;17:235–60. doi:10.1163/157181808X389245
140
Mezmur BD. From Angelina (To Madonna) to Zoe’s ark: What are the ‘A-Z’ Lessons for Intercountry Adoptions in Africa? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2009;23:145–73. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebn013
141
Palmer, Michael. Rethinking Children’s Rights and Interests: Economic Reform, Social Protection and Legal Culture in Post-Mao China. Journal of Comparative Law 2010;5.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jrnatila5&div=42&g_sent=1&collection=journals
142
Roby, Jini L. From Rhetoric to Best Practice: Children’s Rights in Intercountry Adoption. Children’s Legal Rights Journal 2007;27.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/clrj27&div=29&g_sent=1&collection=journals
143
Tobin J, Mcnair R. Public International Law and the Regulation of Private Spaces: Does The Convention on the Rights of the Child Impose an Obligation on States to Allow Gay and Lesbian Couples to Adopt? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2009;23:110–31. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebn020
144
ECJ 04.10.1991 C-159/90 Judgment of the Court of 4 October 1991. The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children Ireland Ltd v Stephen Grogan and others. 4AD.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4KWJ-F0W0-TXHM-409G&csi=301393&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
145
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood - [1997] 2 All ER 687. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-7P90-TWP1-61GW&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
146
A, B AND C v. IRELAND - 25579/05 [2010] ECHR 2032 (16 December 2010). http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/2032.html
147
de Londras F, Dzehtsiarou K. II. GRAND CHAMBER OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, A, B & C v IRELAND, DECISION OF 17 DECEMBER 2010. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2013;62:250–62. doi:10.1017/S0020589312000620
148
M. Hunter-Henin. Surrogacy: Is there Room for a New Liberty Between the French Prohibitive Position And the English Ambivalence? In: Law and Bioethics. Oxford University Press 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545520.001.0001
149
Diarmuid Rossa Phelan. Right to Life of the Unborn v Promotion of Trade in Services: The European Court of Justice and the Normative Shaping of the European Union. The Modern Law Review 1992;55:670–89.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096721
150
Morgan D, Lee RG. In the Name of the Father? Ex parte Blood: Dealing with Novelty and Anomaly. Modern Law Review 1997;60:840–56. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00119
151
Hervey T. Buy baby: the European union and regulation of human reproduction. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1998;18:207–34. doi:10.1093/ojls/18.2.207
152
Margaret Jane Radin. Market-Inalienability. Harvard Law Review 1987;100:1849–937.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/1341192?origin=crossref
153
Evans v United Kingdom (Application 6339/05) (2007) 46 EHRR 728, [2007] 2 FCR 5. Court: European Court of Human Rights. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20880888532&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20880888533&backKey=20_T20880888534&csi=279841&docNo=1&hitNo=ORIGHIT_2&scrollToPosition=114
154
Evans v United Kingdom (Application 6339/05) (2007) 46 EHRR 728, [2007] 2 FCR 5. Court: European Court of Human Rights. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20880888532&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20880888533&backKey=20_T20880888534&csi=279841&docNo=1&hitNo=ORIGHIT_2&scrollToPosition=114
155
Evans v Amicus Healthcare Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 727, [2005] Fam 1. Court: Court of Appeal. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20880959400&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20880959401&backKey=20_T20880959402&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=228
156
Sheldon, Sally. Evans v Amicus Healthcare; Hadley v Midland Fertility Services - Revealing Cracks in the Twin Pillars. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2004;16.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq16&div=43&g_sent=1&collection=journals
157
Freeman M. Rethinking Gillick. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2005;13:201–18. doi:10.1163/1571818054545178
158
Tobin J. The International Obligation to Abolish Traditional Practices Harmful to Children’s Health: What Does It Mean and Require of States? Human Rights Law Review 2009;9:373–96. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngp015
159
Lewis, Hope. Between Irua and Female Genital Mutilation: Feminist Human Rights Discourse and the Cultural Divide. Harvard human rights journal 1995;8.http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/hhrj8&div=5&id=&page=
160
Kristiansen M, Sheikh A. Legislation on male infant circumcision in Europe: a call to avoid paternalism and to promote evidence-based, patient-centred care. Global Discourse 2013;3:342–7. doi:10.1080/23269995.2013.807658
161
DeLaet DL. Genital Autonomy, Children’s Rights, and Competing Rights Claims in International Human Rights Law *. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 2012;20:554–83. doi:10.1163/15718182-55680007
162
SS (Malaysia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 888 (18 July 2013). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/888.html
163
Female genital mutilation/cutting | Child protection from violence, exploitation and abuse | UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/protection/57929_58002.html
164
Bluebond-Langner M. The private worlds of dying children. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1978.
165
Harris-Short S. International Human Rights Law: Imperialist, Inept and Ineffective? Cultural Relativism and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Human Rights Quarterly 2003;25:130–81. doi:10.1353/hrq.2003.0004
166
Sabatello M. Children’s bioethics: the international biopolitical discourse on harmful traditional practices and the right of the child to cultural identity. Leiden: : Martinus Nijhoff 2009.
167
House of Lords - Regina v. Secretary of State for Education and Employment and others (Respondents) ex parte Williamson (Appellant) and others. http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200405/ldjudgmt/jd050224/will-1.htm
168
House of Lords - R (on the application of Begum (by her litigation friend, Rahman)) (Respondent) v. Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School (Appellants). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd060322/begum-1.htm
169
Chamber judgments Dogru v. France and Kervanci v. France 4.12.08. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng-press/pages/search.aspx?i=003-2569490-2781270#{%22itemid%22:[%22003-2569490-2781270%22]}
170
Peter Cumper. Religious Education in Europe in the Twenty-First Century. In: Law, religious freedoms and education in Europe. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011.
171
Eric Barendt. Teaching Evolution, Creationism and Intelligent design in US Schools (with Some European Comparisons). In: Law, religious freedoms and education in Europe. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011.
172
Ahdar R, Leigh I. Religious Freedom in the Liberal State. Oxford University Press 2013. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606474.001.0001
173
Eanmonn Callan. Discrimination and Religious Schooling. In: Citizenship in diverse societies / edited by Will Kymlicka and Wayne Norman.http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg113933876&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg113933876&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=0&frbg=&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&dstmp=1415271777447&srt=rank&mode=Basic&&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=Diverse%20Societies&vid=UCL_VU1
174
Evans C. Religious Education in Public Schools: An International Human Rights Perspective. Human Rights Law Review 2008;8:449–73. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngn020
175
Joel Feinberg. The Child’s right to an open future. In: Whose child?: Children’s rights, parental authority, and state power. Totowa, N.J.: : Rowman and Littlefield 1980.
176
I. Leigh. Objective, Critical and Pluralistic? Religious education & Human Rights in the Public Sphere. In: Law, state and religion in the new Europe: debates and dilemmas. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
177
Temperman J. The Lautsi papers: multidisciplinary reflections on religious symbols in the public school classroom. Leiden: : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2012.
178
Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.text&cid=24
179
Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/NOT/?uri=CELEX:32003R2201
180
RE J (CHILD RETURNED ABROAD: CONVENTION RIGHTS) [2005] UKHL 40. http://www.hcch.net/incadat/fullcase/0801.htm
181
E (Children), Re [2011] UKSC 27 (10 June 2011) Re E (Abduction: Custody Appeal) [2011] UKSC 27, [2012] 1 AC 144. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2011/27.html
182
Re LC (Children) (International Abduction: Child’s Objections to Return) [2014] UKSC 1, [2014] 2 W.L.R. 124. https://supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0221_Judgment.pdf
183
Nigel Lowe. A Supra-National Approach to Interpreting the 1980 Hague Convention – a Tale of Two European Courts’ [2012]. International Family Law;48:170–9.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_IFLONLINE_IFL_2012_06_17
184
Ruth Lamont. Child Abduction in the European Union: Recognizing and Regulating Care and Migration. In: Regulating family responsibilities. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011.
185
Schuz R. Hague child abduction convention: a critical analysis. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2013.
186
Re K (Abduction: Rights of Custody) [2014] UKSC 29. http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR+Dailies%2FWLRD+2011%2Fwlrd2014-218
187
A (Children), Re (Rev 1) [2013] UKSC 60 (09 September 2013). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/60.html
188
Schuz R. Hague child abduction convention: a critical analysis. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2013.
189
Trimmings K. Child abduction within the European Union. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
190
Stalford H. Children and the European Union: rights, welfare and accountability. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
191
Operating the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention:The 2008 Statistics. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/media/en/FAMILYpa/FLJ_FLJ_2011_11_Articles_02_half_sys.pdf
192
P v P [2001] EWCA Civ 166 (13 February 2001). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/166.html
193
MK v CK [2011] EWCA Civ 793 (07 July 2011). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/793.html
194
D v S [2001] NZCA 374; [2002] NZFLR 116; (2001) 21 FRNZ 331 (4 December 2001). http://www.nzlii.org/cgi-bin/sinodisp/nz/cases/NZCA/2001/374.html?query=title(%222002%20NZFLR%20116%22)
195
George RH. Relocation disputes: law and practice in England and New Zealand. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2014.
196
George R. The international relocation debate. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2012;34:141–52. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.675471
197
Jonathan Herring, Rachel Taylor. Relocating Relocation. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2006;18:517–37.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq18&id=525&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
198
Parkinson, Patrick. Freedom of Movement in an Era of Shared Parenting: The Differences in Judicial Approaches to Relocation. Federal Law Review 2008;36:145–72.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/fedlr36&div=12&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults
199
AR (A Child: Relocation), Re [2010] EWHC 1346 (Fam) (10 June 2010). http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2010/1346.html&query=EWHC+and+1346+and+(Fam)&method=boolean
200
K v B (Kacem v Bashir) — Courts of New Zealand. https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/cases/k-v-b-kacem-v-bashir
201
George RH. Relocation disputes: law and practice in England and New Zealand. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2014.
202
Nicholas Bala, Andrea Wheeler. Canadian Relocation Cases: Heading Towards Guidelines. Published Online First: 2012.https://qspace.library.queensu.ca/bitstream/1974/7861/3/relocation-user-guide.pdf
203
Hayes M. Relocation cases: is the Court of Appeal applying the correct principles? Child and Family Law Quarterly;18.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2006_09_3&url=/web/search.xql%3Fc%3Dt%26pub%3DFAMILYpa%26lang%3Den%26action%3Dsearch%26query%3D%252BRelocation%2520%252BCases%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ%26scope%3D%26min%3D25%26max%3D0%26xslmode%3Dhide_excerpts%26sort%3Dcustom%3Achrono%26chunk%3D25%26qqprodname%3DQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&sid=lcSearch.runSearch1415875654404¤tQuery=%252BRelocation%2520%252BCases%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ¤tScope=&query=%252BRelocation%2520%252BCases%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&scope=&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2006_09_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2006_09_3&inner_id=&tid=27a3b1c3-3113-44f1-b469-84d78c3edb6c&addHistory=true&resource=&toc=false
204
Henaghan M. Relocation cases – the rhetoric and the reality of a child’s best interests – a view from the bottom of the world. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2011;23:153–274.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2011_06_4&url=/web/search.xql%3Fc%3Dt%26pub%3DFAMILYpa%26lang%3Den%26action%3Dsearch%26query%3D%252BRelocation%2520%252BCases%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ%26scope%3D%26min%3D0%26max%3D0%26xslmode%3Dhide_excerpts%26sort%3Dcustom%3Achrono%26chunk%3D25%26qqprodname%3DQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&sid=lcSearch.runSearch1415876219349¤tQuery=%252BRelocation%2520%252BCases%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2011_06_4.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2011_06_4&inner_id=&tid=43f94fa3-b026-41d0-9b29-20a7f947cd91&query=%252BRelocation%2520%252BCases%2520%252BQQChildandFamilyLawQuarterlyQQ&scope=&resource=&toc=false¤tScope=
205
Lamont R. Free movement of persons, child abduction and relocation within the European Union. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2012;34:231–44. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.718537
