1
danah boyd and K. Crawford, Information, Communication & Society, 2012, 15, 662–679.
2
N. Seaver, Media, Culture & Society, 2015, 37, 1101–1109.
3
Immersion – Taylor C. Nelms – Medium, https://medium.com/@tnelms/immersion-4c103c0fcac5.
4
The Anxieties of Big Data – The New Inquiry, https://thenewinquiry.com/the-anxieties-of-big-data/.
5
D. Beer, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716646135.
6
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., in Data, now bigger and better!, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
7
F. D. Rubio and P. Baert, Eds., in The politics of knowledge, Routledge, London, 2012.
8
O. Halpern, Beautiful Data, Duke University Press, 2015.
9
R. Kitchin, The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences, SAGE, Los Angeles, 2014.
10
D. Beer, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715578951.
11
T. Striphas, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2015, 18, 395–412.
12
B. Latour, in Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999, pp. 24–79.
13
D. Rosenberg, in ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, ed. L. Gitelman, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2013, vol. Infrastructures series.
14
L. Chua and A. Salmond, in SAGE handbook of social anthropology, SAGE, 2012, pp. 101–115.
15
H. Verran, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 60–72.
16
I. Hacking, in The Taming of Chance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, vol. Ideas in Context, pp. 1–10.
17
T. M. Porter, Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, 1995.
18
Y. Hui, Metaphilosophy, 2012, 43, 380–395.
19
O. Halpern, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 223–238.
20
O. Halpern, Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 2014, vol. Experimental futures.
21
A. Riles, in Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2006, pp. 1–38.
22
L. Gitelman, ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2013, vol. Infrastructures series.
23
P. Dourish and M. Mazmanian, in How Matter Matters, eds. P. R. Carlile, D. Nicolini, A. Langley and H. Tsoukas, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 92–118.
24
N. Starosielski, The undersea network, Duke University Press, Durham, 2015.
25
A. Vonderau, Ethnos, 2018, 84, 698–712.
27
Microsoft Project Natick: Is it really a good idea to dump data centres at the bottom of the sea? | WIRED UK, https://www.wired.co.uk/article/microsoft-data-centre-orkney-sinks-project-natick.
28
M. Hogan, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715592429.
29
H. Geismar and W. Mohns, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2011, 17, S133–S155.
31
L. Manovich, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 1999, 5, 80–99.
32
G. Bowker, in Memory practices in the sciences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2005, vol. Inside technology, pp. 107–136.
33
A. J. M. Salmond, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, , DOI:10.14318/hau3.3.002.
34
G. C. Bowker and S. L. Star, Sorting things out: classification and its consequences, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1999, vol. Inside technology.
35
W. H. K. Chun, Critical Inquiry, 2008, 35, 148–171.
36
J. Holt and Patrick Vondereau, in Traffic signal timing manual, U.S. Department of Transportation, [Washington, D.C.], 2014.
37
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 311–333.
38
Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 2015, 44, 436–437.
39
D. Haraway, in Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience, Routledge, New York, 1997.
40
M. Strathern and University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology, The relation: issues in complexity and scale, Prickly Pear Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1995, vol. Prickly Pear pamphlet.
41
C. B. Jensen and A. Morita, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2015, 1, 81–87.
42
P. Harvey, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 76–92.
43
A. Mackenzie, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 189–207.
44
H. Verran, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2009, 2, 169–182.
45
A. J. M. Salmond, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 1–32.
46
M. Strathern, Social Anthropology, 2012, 20, 397–410.
47
N. A. John, New Media & Society, 2013, 15, 167–182.
48
J. Van Dijck and T. Poell, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716654173.
49
What’s Not Included in Facebook’s ‘Download Your Data’ | WIRED, https://www.wired.com/story/whats-not-included-in-facebooks-download-your-data/.
50
We May Own Our Data, But Facebook Has a Duty to Protect It | The New Yorker, https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/we-may-own-our-data-but-facebook-has-a-duty-to-protect-it.
51
Brian Moylan, Guardian.
52
Paul Taylor · Whose Property?: Big Medical Data · LRB 8 February 2018, https://www.lrb.co.uk/v40/n03/paul-taylor/whose-property.
53
Tsing, Anna, HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 21–43.
54
Maurer, W.M., Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago, 2015, pp. 67–86.
55
J. Laidlaw, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 2000, 6, 617–634.
56
S. Day and C. Lury, in Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life, MIT Press, 2016.
57
A. E. Marwick and danah boyd, New Media & Society, 2014, 16, 1051–1067.
58
Janet Carsten, in After Kinship by Janet Carsten, Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–108.
59
S. Leonelli, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 2013, 33, 6–11.
60
M. Fortun, in Postgenomics, eds. S. S. Richardson and H. Stevens, Duke University Press, 2015.
61
M. Biagioli, in Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science, Routledge, New York, 2013, pp. 253–281.
62
S. S. Richardson and H. Stevens, Postgenomics: perspectives on biology after the genome, Duke University Press, Durham, 2015.
63
A. B. Weiner, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992, pp. 23–43.
64
A. B. Weiner, in Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992.
65
J. Lezaun and C. M. Montgomery, Science, Technology & Human Values, 2015, 40, 3–29.
66
S. Hilgartner, The British Journal for the History of Science, 2012, 45, 267–280.
67
C. M. Kelty, BioSocieties, 2012, 7, 140–168.
68
E. Hirsch and M. Strathern, Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia, Berghahn Books, New York, 2004.
69
J. Leach, Social Analysis, , DOI:10.3167/sa.2011.550308.
70
D. Miller, in The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, N.M., 2001, vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series.
71
M. Gregg, in Data, now bigger and better!, eds. T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
72
Antonia Walford, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 2012, 30, 101–117.
73
D. Haraway, Feminist Studies, , DOI:10.2307/3178066.
74
S. Jasanoff, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951717724477.
75
T. Nadim, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716666301.
76
J. Gabrys, H. Pritchard and B. Barratt, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716679677.
77
J. Tollefson, Nature, , DOI:10.1038/nature.2015.17700.
78
Rogue Scientists Race to Save Climate Data from Trump | WIRED, https://www.wired.com/2017/01/rogue-scientists-race-save-climate-data-trump/.
79
There’s life in the old Pause yet | Watts Up With That?, https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/08/theres-life-in-the-old-pause-yet/.
80
K. Asdal, Geoforum, 2008, 39, 123–132.
81
B. Büscher, New Media & Society, 2016, 18, 726–743.
82
Kim Fortun, Osiris, 2004, 19, 283–296.
83
Arturo Escobar, Current Anthropology, 1999, 40, 1–30.
84
J. Whitington, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 2016, 39, 46–63.
85
T. Nadim, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716666301.
86
E. Garnett, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716658061.
87
K. Fortun, L. Poirier, A. Morgan, B. Costelloe-Kuehn and M. Fortun, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716668903.
88
I. Lippert, Geoforum, 2015, 66, 126–135.
89
S. Dalsgaard, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2013, 3, 80–98.
90
M. Grebowicz, Environmental Humanities, 2014, 5, 1–11.
91
Stefan Helmreich, Social Research, 2011, 78, 1211–1242.
92
J. Gabrys, Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2016, vol. Electronic mediations.
93
H. Verran, in Inventive methods: the happening of the social, eds. C. Lury and N. Wakeford, Routledge, Abingdon, 2014, vol. Culture, economy and the social.
94
H. Knox, in Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas, eds. H. Appel, A. Mason and M. Watts, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 2015.
95
J. Gabrys, in Media and the Ecological Crisis, eds. R. Maxwell, J. Raundalen and N. L. Vestberg, Routledge, London, 2017, pp. 3–18.
96
Sabina Leonelli, Philosophy of Science, 2015, 82, 810–821.
97
M. Strathern, After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992, vol. The Lewis Henry Morgan lectures.
98
S. Shackley and B. Wynne, Science, Technology & Human Values, 1996, 21, 275–302.
99
J. Fairhead, M. Leach and I. Scoones, Journal of Peasant Studies, 2012, 39, 237–261.
100
J. Igoe, Critique of Anthropology, 2010, 30, 375–397.
101
S. Helmreich, BioSocieties, 2007, 2, 287–302.
102
M. Lehning, N. Dawes and M. Bavay et. al., in The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery, Microsoft Research, Redmond, Wash, pp. 45–51.
103
S. Franklin, Anthropological Theory, 2003, 3, 65–85.
104
The Postgenomic Condition: Ethics, Justice, and Knowledge after the Genome, Reardon, https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo22726485.html.
105
23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American, https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/.
106
With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox, http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme.
107
Take an online DNA test and you could be revealing far more than you realise | University of Oxford, http://www.ox.ac.uk/research/take-online-dna-test-and-you-could-be-revealing-far-more-you-realise.
108
Barbara Ellen, Guardian.
109
Alan Travis, Guardian.
110
Report: Police Forced a DNA Testing Company to Share a Customer’s Identity in the Golden State Killer Case, https://gizmodo.com/report-police-forced-a-dna-testing-company-to-share-a-1825687924.
111
E. Thacker, Configurations, 2003, 11, 47–79.
112
Bioinformation - Parry and Greenhough, http://politybooks.com/author-books/?authid=Beth%20Greenhough.
113
R. Tutton and B. Prainsack, Sociology of Health & Illness, 2011, 33, 1081–1095.
114
N. K. Hayles, How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics, University of Chicago P., Chicago, 1999.
115
After Kinship by Janet Carsten, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9.
116
M. Ruckenstein, Societies, 2014, 4, 68–84.
117
A. Beaulieu, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2004, 35, 367–390.
118
S. Helmreich, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., 2002, pp. 116–143.
119
S. Franklin, in Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies, Duke University Press, Durham [N.C.], 2001, pp. 302–325.
120
N. Singer, The New York Times.
121
D. Lupton, Sociology of Health & Illness, 2014, 36, 856–869.
122
Dawn Nafus, International Journal of Communication.
123
G. Doe, With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox, http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme.
124
J. Fujimara, in The practices of human genetics, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1999, vol. Sociology of the sciences, pp. 49–87.
125
P. Rabinow, Essays on the anthropology of reason, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, 1996, vol. Princeton studies in culture/power/history.
126
A. Gross, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 113–129.
127
J. Van Dijck, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 2000, 31, 271–285.
128
C. Gerlitz and C. Lury, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 174–188.
129
M. Kaufmann, Media, Culture & Society, 2015, 37, 972–987.
130
D. Nafus, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 2014, 15, 208–222.
131
L. A. Sharp, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2000, 29, 287–328.
132
M. Strathern, in Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005, pp. 111–134.
133
D. Lupton, The quantified self: a sociology of self-tracking, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2016.
134
This one does not go up to 11 - Nafus and Sherman, http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/2170/1157.
135
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter.
136
The frightening promise of self-tracking pills - The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2015/10/7/9466121/proteus-digital-pill-tracking-privacy-quantified-self.
137
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0.
138
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus, http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/.
139
D. Lupton, Critical Public Health, 2013, 23, 393–403.
141
M. Ruckenstein, in Techno-anthropology in health informatics: methodologies for improving human-technology relations, eds. L. Botin, P. Bertelsen and C. Nohr, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2015, pp. 28–40.
142
M. Ruckenstein, Societies, 2014, 4, 68–84.
143
M. Ruckenstein and N. D. Schüll, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2017, 46, 261–278.
144
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus, http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/.
145
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0.
146
M. Pantzar and M. Ruckenstein, Consumption Markets & Culture, 2015, 18, 92–109.
147
D. Poole and V. Das, Anthropology in the margins of the state, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, N.M., 1st ed., 2004.
148
S. Browne, Dark Matters, Duke University Press, 2015.
149
L. Amoore, Political Geography, 2006, 25, 336–351.
150
A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project - The Verge, https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/26/17285058/predictive-policing-predpol-pentagon-ai-racial-bias.
151
Owen Bowcott, Guardian.
152
Mike Rowe, The Conversation.
153
G. Steinmetz, in State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1999, vol. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture.
154
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg, https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED.
155
C. Birchall, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716663965.
156
Gilles Deleuze, October, 1992, 59, 3–7.
157
V. Adams, Metrics, Duke University Press, 2016.
158
K. D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson, British Journal of Sociology, 2000, 51, 605–622.
159
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J, .
160
E. Ruppert and M. Savage, The Sociological Review, 2011, 59, 73–92.
161
L. Roderick, Critical Sociology, 2014, 40, 729–746.
162
A. M’charek, K. Schramm and D. Skinner, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 2014, 39, 468–487.
163
A. Sharma and A. Gupta, in The anthropology of the state: a reader, Blackwell, Malden, Mass, 2006, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology.
164
Universitetet i Oslo, State formation: anthropological perspectives, Pluto Press, London, 2005, vol. Anthropology, culture, and society.
165
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon, in Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies.
166
D. Lyon, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714541861.
167
E. Isin and E. Ruppert, International Journal of Communication.
168
D. LYON, Bioethics, 2008, 22, 499–508.
169
Evelyn Ruppert, Sociology, 2011, 45, 218–233.
170
D. Lupton, Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015.
171
M. Fuller and A. Goffey, in Evil media, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2012, pp. 100–104.
172
J. Vertesi, Time.com, 2014, 1–1.
173
L. Amoore, Theory, Culture & Society, 2011, 28, 24–43.
174
M. Strathern, in Conceptualizing society, Routledge, London, 1992, pp. 75–106.
175
E. Ruppert, Theory, Culture & Society, 2012, 29, 116–136.
176
D. Lyon, Bioethics, 2008, 22, 499–508.
177
D. Lyon, International Political Sociology, 2010, 4, 325–338.
178
C. Anderson, The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete, http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
180
Anna Tsing, Cultural Anthropology, 2000, 15, 327–360.
181
C. Coopmans, in Representation in scientific practice revisited, ed. C. Coopmans, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2014, vol. Inside technology.
183
Annelise Riles, American Ethnologist, 1998, 25, 378–398.
185
T. Boellstorff and B. Maurer, Eds., in Data, now bigger and better!, Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2015, vol. Paradigm.
186
B. Latour, P. Jensen, T. Venturini, S. Grauwin and D. Boullier, The British Journal of Sociology, 2012, 63, 590–615.
187
R. W. Lake, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951716682537.
188
D. boyd and K. Crawford, Information, Communication & Society, 2012, 15, 662–679.
189
N. Seaver, Media, Culture & Society, 2015, 37, 1101–1109.
190
R. L. Breiger, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951715602497.
191
R. Kitchin, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714528481.
192
M. Strathern, Partial connections, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, Updated ed., 2004.
193
M. Strathern, in Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, vol. The Linacre lectures, pp. 44–71.
194
M. Strathern, in Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices, Duke University Press, Durham, 2002, vol. Science and cultural theory.
195
B. Marr, The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data, http://data-informed.com/.
196
G. Marcus, in Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, 2010, pp. 28–46.
197
N. Couldry and A. Powell, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714539277.
198
S. Lash, Theory, Culture & Society, 2007, 24, 55–78.
199
G. C. Bowker, International Journal of Communication.
200
D. Beer and R. Burrows, Theory, Culture & Society, 2013, 30, 47–71.
201
T. Boellstorff, First Monday, , DOI:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869.
202
K. Anderson, D. Nafus, T. Rattenbury and R. Aipperspach, Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, 2009, 2009, 123–140.
203
E. A. Povinelli, differences, 2011, 22, 146–171.
204
A. Blok, H. B. Carlsen, T. B. Jørgensen, M. M. Madsen, S. Ralund and M. A. Pedersen, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951717736337.
205
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows, Sociology, 2007, 41, 885–899.
206
A. Riles, The network inside out: Annelise Riles, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2000.
207
H. Ford, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714544337.
208
M. Strathern, in Anthropology at home, Tavistock Publications, London, 1987, vol. A.S.A. monographs, pp. 16–37.
209
N. Seaver, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951717738104.
210
N. Marres and E. Weltevrede, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2013, 6, 313–335.
211
Wendy F. Hsu, , DOI:10.4324/9781315673974.ch4.
212
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro, Cultural Anthropology, 2008, 23, 1–14.
213
A. Blok and M. A. Pedersen, Big Data & Society, , DOI:10.1177/2053951714543908.
214
T. Boellstorff, in Digital anthropology, Berg, London, 2012.
215
A. Riles, The network inside out: Annelise Riles, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 2000.
216
H. Verran, M. Christie, B. Anbins-King, T. Van Weeren and W. Yunupingu, Digital Creativity, 2007, 18, 129–142.
217
Haidy Geismar and William Mohns, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute.
218
MARILYN STRATHERN, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 2001, 22, 52–66.
219
C. Kelty, G. Coleman and K. Strassler, Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection, http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection.
220
M. Strathern, in Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things, Athlone, London, 1999.
221
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium, https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.
222
E. Ruppert, J. Law and M. Savage, Theory, Culture & Society, 2013, 30, 22–46.
223
D. Nafus, Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC, https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/.
224
» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST, https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/.
225
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab, http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/.
226
A. Mackenzie, Social Studies of Science, 2003, 33, 365–387.
227
Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment, http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm.
228
N. Seaver, Studying up: the ethnography of technologists, http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/.
