1
boyd danah, Crawford K. CRITICAL QUESTIONS FOR BIG DATA. Information, Communication & Society 2012;15:662–79. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
2
Seaver N. The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture & Society 2015;37:1101–9. doi:10.1177/0163443715594102
3
Immersion – Taylor C. Nelms – Medium. https://medium.com/@tnelms/immersion-4c103c0fcac5
4
The Anxieties of Big Data – The New Inquiry. https://thenewinquiry.com/the-anxieties-of-big-data/
5
Beer D. How should we do the history of Big Data? Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716646135
6
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, editors. Seaver, N. (2015) Bastard Algebra. In: Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: : Prickly Paradigm Press 2015.
7
Rubio FD, Baert P, editors. Leach, J. (2012) ‘Step inside: knowledge freely available’: The politics of (making) knowledge-objects’. In: The politics of knowledge. London: : Routledge 2012. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134004386
8
Halpern O. Beautiful Data. Duke University Press 2015. doi:10.1215/9780822376323-010
9
Kitchin R. The data revolution: big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Los Angeles: : SAGE 2014. http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/the-data-revolution/SAGE.xml
10
Beer D. Productive measures: Culture and measurement in the context of everyday neoliberalism. Big Data & Society 2015;2. doi:10.1177/2053951715578951
11
Striphas T. Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 2015;18:395–412. doi:10.1177/1367549415577392
12
Latour B. Bruno Latour Pandora’s Hope Ch 2: Circulating Reference. In: Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1999. 24–79.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a214d3b6-7cf1-e711-80cd-005056af4099
13
Rosenberg D. Data before the fact. In: Gitelman L, ed. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2013. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6451327
14
Chua L, Salmond A. Artefacts in anthropology. In: SAGE handbook of social anthropology. SAGE 2012. 101–15.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8fd0b472-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
15
Verran H. The changing lives of measures and values: from centre stage in the fading ‘disciplinary’ society to pervasive background instrument in the emergent ‘control’ society. The Sociological Review 2011;59:60–72. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02059.x
16
Hacking I. The argument. In: The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990. 1–10.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819766
17
Porter TM. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1995.
18
Hui Y. What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy 2012;43:380–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
19
Halpern O. Cybernetic rationality. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 2014;15:223–38. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.923320
20
Halpern O. Beautiful data: a history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2014.
21
Riles A. Introduction: in response. In: Documents: artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2006. 1–38.
22
Gitelman L. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2013. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327
23
Dourish P, Mazmanian M. Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice. In: Carlile PR, Nicolini D, Langley A, et al., eds. How Matter Matters. Oxford University Press 2013. 92–118. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671533.003.0005
24
Starosielski N. The undersea network. Durham: : Duke University Press 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822376224
25
Vonderau A. Scaling the Cloud: Making State and Infrastructure in Sweden. Ethnos 2018;84:698–712. doi:10.1080/00141844.2018.1471513
26
Alex Hern. Google says non to French demand to expand right to be forgotten worldwide. Guardian Published Online First: 30 July 2015.https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/30/google-rejects-france-expand-right-to-be-forgotten-worldwide
27
Microsoft Project Natick: Is it really a good idea to dump data centres at the bottom of the sea? | WIRED UK. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/microsoft-data-centre-orkney-sinks-project-natick
28
Hogan M. Data flows and water woes: The Utah Data Center. Big Data & Society 2015;2. doi:10.1177/2053951715592429
29
Geismar H, Mohns W. Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:S133–55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01693.x
30
Dourish, P. (2014) No SQL: The Shifting Materialities of Databases. Computational Culture: a Journal of Software Studies. Issue 4. http://computationalculture.net/article/no-sql-the-shifting-materialities-of-database-technology
31
Manovich L. Database as Symbolic Form. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 1999;5:80–99. doi:10.1177/135485659900500206
32
Bowker G. Databasing the world: biodiversity and the 2000s. In: Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2005. 107–36.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb97c1ed-7efb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
33
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I). HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3. doi:10.14318/hau3.3.002
34
Bowker GC, Star SL. Sorting things out: classification and its consequences. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1999. http://cognet.mit.edu/book/sorting-things-out
35
Chun WHK. The Enduring Ephemeral, or the Future Is a Memory. Critical Inquiry 2008;35:148–71. doi:10.1086/595632
36
J. Holt, Patrick Vondereau. Where the Internet Lives: Data Centers as Cloud Infrastructure. In: Traffic signal timing manual. [Washington, D.C.]: : U.S. Department of Transportation 2014. http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpTSTMPNF2/traffic_signal_timing_manual_publication_no_fhwahop08024
37
Fuller M, Goffey A. Digital Infrastructures and the Machinery of Topological Abstraction. Theory, Culture & Society 2012;29:311–33. doi:10.1177/0263276412450466
38
To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 2015;44:436–7. doi:10.1177/0094306115579192c
39
Haraway D. Chapter 4: Gene. In: Modest₋Witness@Second₋Millennium.FemaleMan₋Meets₋OncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. New York: : Routledge 1997.
40
Strathern M, University of Cambridge. Department of Social Anthropology. The relation: issues in complexity and scale. Cambridge, U.K.: : Prickly Pear Press 1995.
41
Jensen CB, Morita A. Infrastructures as Ontological Experiments. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2015;1:81–7.http://estsjournal.org/article/view/21
42
Harvey P. The Topological Quality of Infrastructural Relation: An Ethnographic Approach. Theory, Culture & Society 2012;29:76–92. doi:10.1177/0263276412448827
43
Mackenzie A. Multiplying numbers differently: an epidemiology of contagious convolution. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 2014;15:189–207. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.922110
44
Verran H. On assemblage. Journal of Cultural Economy 2009;2:169–82. doi:10.1080/17530350903064188
45
Salmond AJM. Transforming translations (part I): ‘The owner of these bones’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:1–32. doi:10.14318/hau3.3.002
46
Strathern M. Gifts money cannot buy. Social Anthropology 2012;20:397–410. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2012.00224.x
47
John NA. Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society 2013;15:167–82. doi:10.1177/1461444812450684
48
Van Dijck J, Poell T. Understanding the promises and premises of online health platforms. Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716654173
49
What’s Not Included in Facebook’s ‘Download Your Data’ | WIRED. https://www.wired.com/story/whats-not-included-in-facebooks-download-your-data/
50
We May Own Our Data, But Facebook Has a Duty to Protect It | The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/we-may-own-our-data-but-facebook-has-a-duty-to-protect-it
51
Brian Moylan. Grindr was a safe space for gay men. Its HIV status leak betrayed us | Brian Moylan. Guardian Published Online First: 4 April 2018.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/apr/04/grindr-gay-men-hiv-status-leak-app
52
Paul Taylor · Whose Property?: Big Medical Data · LRB 8 February 2018. https://www.lrb.co.uk/v40/n03/paul-taylor/whose-property
53
Tsing, Anna. Sorting out commodities: How capitalist value is made through gifts. HAU : Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:21–43.https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1850088542?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
54
Maurer, W.M. Principles of Alliance and Descent for Big Data. Prickly Paradigm Press/University of Chicago 2015. 67–86.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/41r1s161
55
Laidlaw J. A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2000;6:617–34. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00036
56
S. Day, C. Lury. Biosensing: Tracking Persons. In: Quantified:Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. MIT Press 2016. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580073.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
57
Marwick AE, boyd danah. Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society 2014;16:1051–67. doi:10.1177/1461444814543995
58
Janet Carsten. Ch. 4: The person. In: After Kinship by Janet Carsten. Cambridge University Press 83–108.https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
59
Leonelli S. Why the Current Insistence on Open Access to Scientific Data? Big Data, Knowledge Production, and the Political Economy of Contemporary Biology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 2013;33:6–11. doi:10.1177/0270467613496768
60
M. Fortun. What Toll Pursuit: Affective Assemblages in Genomics and Postgenomics. In: Richardson SS, Stevens H, eds. Postgenomics. Duke University Press 2015. doi:10.1215/9780822375449
61
Biagioli M. Rights or rewards? Changing frameworks of scientific authorship. In: Scientific authorship: credit and intellectual property in science. New York: : Routledge 2013. 253–81. doi:10.4324/9780203954270
62
Richardson SS, Stevens H. Postgenomics: perspectives on biology after the genome. Durham: : Duke University Press 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822375449
63
Weiner AB. Inalienable possessions: The forgotten dimension. In: Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1992. 23–43.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c630b45e-7ffb-e711-80cd-005056af4099
64
Weiner AB. Reconfiguring Exchange Theory: The Maori Hau. In: Inalienable possessions: the paradox of keeping-while-giving. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1992.
65
Lezaun J, Montgomery CM. The Pharmaceutical Commons: Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development. Science, Technology & Human Values 2015;40:3–29. doi:10.1177/0162243914542349
66
Hilgartner S. Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction: information control in genome research. The British Journal for the History of Science 2012;45:267–80. doi:10.1017/S0007087412000106
67
Kelty CM. This is not an article: Model organism newsletters and the question of ‘open science’. BioSocieties 2012;7:140–68. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2012.8
68
Hirsch E, Strathern M. Transactions and creations: property debates and the stimulus of Melanesia. New York: : Berghahn Books 2004. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv287skdk
69
Leach J. The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctionsin an Interdisciplinary Collaboration. Social Analysis 2011;55. doi:10.3167/sa.2011.550308
70
D. Miller. Alienable Gifts and Inalienable Commodities. In: The empire of things: regimes of value and material culture. Santa Fe, N.M.: : School of American Research Press 2001.
71
Gregg M. The Gift That Is Not Given. In: Boellstorff T, Maurer B, eds. Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: : Prickly Paradigm Press 2015.
72
Antonia Walford. Data Moves: Taking Amazonian Climate Science Seriously. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 2012;30:101–17.http://www.jstor.org/stable/43610877?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
73
Haraway D. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 1988;14. doi:10.2307/3178066
74
Jasanoff S. Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice. Big Data & Society 2017;4. doi:10.1177/2053951717724477
75
Nadim T. Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels. Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716666301
76
Gabrys J, Pritchard H, Barratt B. Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716679677
77
Tollefson J. Climate-change ‘hiatus’ disappears with new data. Nature Published Online First: 4 June 2015. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17700
78
Rogue Scientists Race to Save Climate Data from Trump | WIRED. https://www.wired.com/2017/01/rogue-scientists-race-save-climate-data-trump/
79
There’s life in the old Pause yet | Watts Up With That? https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/10/08/theres-life-in-the-old-pause-yet/
80
Asdal K. Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing. Geoforum 2008;39:123–32. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004
81
Büscher B. Nature 2.0: Exploring and theorizing the links between new media and nature conservation. New Media & Society 2016;18:726–43. doi:10.1177/1461444814545841
82
Kim Fortun. From Bhopal to the Informating of Environmentalism: Risk Communication in Historical Perspective. Osiris 2004;19:283–96.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3655245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
83
Arturo Escobar. After Nature Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology. Current Anthropology 1999;40:1–30.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/515799?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
84
Whitington J. Carbon as a Metric of the Human. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 2016;39:46–63. doi:10.1111/plar.12130
85
Nadim T. Blind regards: Troubling data and their sentinels. Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716666301
86
Garnett E. Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716658061
87
Fortun K, Poirier L, Morgan A, et al. Pushback: Critical data designers and pollution politics. Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716668903
88
Lippert I. Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting. Geoforum 2015;66:126–35. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009
89
Dalsgaard S. The commensurability of carbon. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3:80–98. doi:10.14318/hau3.1.006
90
Grebowicz M. Glacial Time and Lonely Crowds:The social effects of climate change as internet spectacle. Environmental Humanities 2014;5:1–11.https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3615388
91
Stefan Helmreich. From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures. Social Research 2011;78:1211–42.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
92
Gabrys J. Program earth: environmental sensing technology and the making of a computational planet. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2016. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b7x5gq
93
Verran H. Number as Generative Device. In: Lury C, Wakeford N, eds. Inventive methods: the happening of the social. Abingdon: : Routledge 2014.
94
Knox H. Carbon, Convertibility, and the Technopolitics of Oil. In: Appel H, Mason A, Watts M, eds. Subterranean estates: life worlds of oil and gas. Ithaca: : Cornell University Press 2015. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931090819204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,990022437450204761&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9022657445453213247&offset=0
95
Gabrys J. Powering the digital: From energy ecologies to electronic environmentalism. In: Maxwell R, Raundalen J, Vestberg NL, eds. Media and the Ecological Crisis. London: : Routledge 2017. 3–18.
96
Sabina Leonelli. What Counts as Scientific Data? A Relational Framework. Philosophy of Science 2015;82:810–21.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/684083?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
97
Strathern M. After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1992.
98
Shackley S, Wynne B. Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority. Science, Technology & Human Values 1996;21:275–302. doi:10.1177/016224399602100302
99
Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I. Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies 2012;39:237–61. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770
100
Igoe J. The spectacle of nature in the global economy of appearances: Anthropological engagements with the spectacular mediations of transnational conservation. Critique of Anthropology 2010;30:375–97. doi:10.1177/0308275X10372468
101
Helmreich S. Blue-green Capital, Biotechnological Circulation and an Oceanic Imaginary: A Critique of Biopolitical Economy. BioSocieties 2007;2:287–302. doi:10.1017/S1745855207005753
102
Lehning M, Dawes N, Bavay et. al. M. Instrumenting the earth: Next-generation sensor networks and environmental science. In: The fourth paradigm: data-intensive scientific discovery. Redmond, Wash: : Microsoft Research 45–51.
103
Franklin S. Re-thinking nature-culture: Anthropology and the new genetics. Anthropological Theory 2003;3:65–85. doi:10.1177/1463499603003001752
104
The Postgenomic Condition: Ethics, Justice, and Knowledge after the Genome, Reardon. https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo22726485.html
105
23andMe Is Terrifying, but Not for the Reasons the FDA Thinks - Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/23andme-is-terrifying-but-not-for-the-reasons-the-fda-thinks/
106
With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
107
Take an online DNA test and you could be revealing far more than you realise | University of Oxford. http://www.ox.ac.uk/research/take-online-dna-test-and-you-could-be-revealing-far-more-you-realise
108
Barbara Ellen. What I learned from home DNA testing. Guardian Published Online First: 23 July 2017.https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jul/23/what-i-learned-from-home-dna-test-kits-are-they-accurate-or-worthwhile
109
Alan Travis. Innocent suspects’ profiles still reaching DNA database. Guardian Published Online First: 28 October 2009.https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/oct/28/dna-database-innocent-profiles
110
Report: Police Forced a DNA Testing Company to Share a Customer’s Identity in the Golden State Killer Case. https://gizmodo.com/report-police-forced-a-dna-testing-company-to-share-a-1825687924
111
Thacker E. What is Biomedia? Configurations 2003;11:47–79. doi:10.1353/con.2004.0014
112
Bioinformation - Parry and Greenhough. http://politybooks.com/author-books/?authid=Beth%20Greenhough
113
Tutton R, Prainsack B. Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research. Sociology of Health & Illness 2011;33:1081–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x
114
Hayles NK. How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: : University of Chicago P. 1999.
115
After Kinship by Janet Carsten. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/after-kinship/BF660970EC79E6A4847E76A38CBE1DB9
116
Ruckenstein M. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies 2014;4:68–84. doi:10.3390/soc4010068
117
Beaulieu A. From brainbank to database: the informational turn in the study of the brain. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2004;35:367–90. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.03.011
118
Helmreich S. Kinship in Hypertext. In: Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2002. 116–43.http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780822383222
119
Franklin S. Biologization Re-visited: Kinship Theory. In: Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Durham [N.C.]: : Duke University Press 2001. 302–25.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9931045211204761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Relative%20values:%20reconfiguring%20kinship%20studies&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,61215140135456524&offset=0
120
Singer N. From knowing yourself to prodding yourself. The New York Times 2015.
121
Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness 2014;36:856–69. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12109
122
Dawn Nafus. Big Data, Big Questions - This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication 2014;8.http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
123
Doe G. With genetic testing, I gave my parents the gift of divorce - Vox. Vox Genetics. 2014.http://www.vox.com/2014/9/9/5975653/with-genetic-testing-i-gave-my-parents-the-gift-of-divorce-23andme
124
Fujimara J. The Practice of Producing Meaning in Bioinformatics. In: The practices of human genetics. Dordrecht: : Kluwer Academic 1999. 49–87.
125
Rabinow P. Essays on the anthropology of reason. Princeton, N.J: : Princeton University Press 1996.
126
Gross A. The economy of social data: exploring research ethics as device. The Sociological Review 2011;59:113–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02055.x
127
Van Dijck J. Digital cadavers: the visible human project as anatomical theater. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2000;31:271–85. doi:10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00020-5
128
Gerlitz C, Lury C. Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 2014;15:174–88. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267
129
Kaufmann M. Resilience 2.0: social media use and (self-)care during the 2011 Norway attacks. Media, Culture & Society 2015;37:972–87. doi:10.1177/0163443715584101
130
Nafus D. Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 2014;15:208–22. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.920266
131
Sharp LA. The Commodification of the Body and its Parts. Annual Review of Anthropology 2000;29:287–328. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.287
132
Strathern M. Chapter 5: Losing (out on) Intellectual Resources. In: Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2005. 111–34.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614514
133
Lupton D. The quantified self: a sociology of self-tracking. Cambridge: : Polity Press 2016. https://search-ebscohost-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1353377&site=ehost-live&scope=site&custid=s8454451
134
This one does not go up to 11 - Nafus and Sherman. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/viewFile/2170/1157
135
Greenfield, D. (2016) Deep Data: Notes on the n of 1. In ‘Quantified: biosensing technologies in everyday life’ ed. Dawn Nafus. MIT Press. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/xpl/ebooks/bookPdfWithBanner.jsp?fileName=7580296.pdf&bkn=7580015&pdfType=chapter
136
The frightening promise of self-tracking pills - The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2015/10/7/9466121/proteus-digital-pill-tracking-privacy-quantified-self
137
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0
138
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus. http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/
139
Lupton D. Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health 2013;23:393–403. doi:10.1080/09581596.2013.794931
140
Lupton, D. 2016 You are Your Data: Self-tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.
141
Ruckenstein M. Uncovering Everyday Rhythms and Patterns: Food tracking and new forms of visibility and temporality in health care. In: Botin L, Bertelsen P, Nohr C, eds. Techno-anthropology in health informatics: methodologies for improving human-technology relations. Amsterdam: : IOS Press 2015. 28–40.http://ebooks.iospress.nl/isbn/978-1-61499-560-9
142
Ruckenstein M. Visualized and Interacted Life: Personal Analytics and Engagements with Data Doubles. Societies 2014;4:68–84. doi:10.3390/soc4010068
143
Ruckenstein M, Schüll ND. The Datafication of Health. Annual Review of Anthropology 2017;46:261–78. doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041244
144
Hippocratic Hacking | Platypus. http://blog.castac.org/2016/10/hippocratic-hacking/
145
The Healing Power of Your Own Medical Records - The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/technology/the-healing-power-of-your-own-medical-data.html?_r=0
146
Pantzar M, Ruckenstein M. The heart of everyday analytics: emotional, material and practical extensions in self-tracking market. Consumption Markets & Culture 2015;18:92–109. doi:10.1080/10253866.2014.899213
147
Poole D, Das V. Anthropology in the margins of the state. 1st ed. Santa Fe, N.M.: : School of American Research Press 2004. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781934691656/
148
Browne S. Dark Matters. Duke University Press 2015. doi:10.1215/9780822375302
149
Amoore L. Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror. Political Geography 2006;25:336–51. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001
150
A pioneer in predictive policing is starting a troubling new project - The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/4/26/17285058/predictive-policing-predpol-pentagon-ai-racial-bias
151
Owen Bowcott. Home Office data exemption sparks fears of further Windrush scandals. Guardian Published Online First: 23 April 2018.https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/23/home-office-data-exemption-sparks-fears-of-renewed-windrush-scandals
152
Mike Rowe. AI profiling: the social and moral hazards of ‘predictive’ policing. The Conversationhttps://theconversation.com/ai-profiling-the-social-and-moral-hazards-of-predictive-policing-92960
153
Steinmetz G. Mitchell, T. (1999) Society, Economy and the State Effect. In State/Culture: State Formation after the Cultural Turn. In: State/culture: state-formation after the cultural turn. Ithaca, N.Y.: : Cornell University Press 1999. https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14616198260004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
154
The World of Indicators edited by Richard Rottenburg. https://www-cambridge-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/core/books/world-of-indicators/C7903E69E0329A256EF02C3CB5C918ED
155
Birchall C. Shareveillance: Subjectivity between open and closed data. Big Data & Society 2016;3. doi:10.1177/2053951716663965
156
Gilles Deleuze. Postscript on the Societies of Control. October 1992;59:3–7.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/778828?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
157
Adams V. Metrics. Duke University Press 2016. doi:10.1215/9780822374480
158
D. Haggerty, Richard V. Ericson K. The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 2000;51:605–22. doi:10.1080/00071310020015280
159
Nafus, D ; Sherman, J. This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_wos000349010500023&indx=1&recIds=TN_wos000349010500023&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Nafus%2C%20D.%20and%20J.%20Sherman%20%282014%29%20This%20One%20Does%20Not%20Go%20Up%20to%20Eleven%3A%20The%20Quantifed%20Self%20Movement%20as%20an%20Alternative%20Big%20Data%20Practice.%20International%20Journal%20of%20Communication%2C%20Vol%208.&dstmp=1471435285056
160
Ruppert E, Savage M. Transactional politics. The Sociological Review 2011;59:73–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02057.x
161
Roderick L. Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: The Case of the US Consumer Data Broker Industry. Critical Sociology 2014;40:729–46. doi:10.1177/0896920513501350
162
M’charek A, Schramm K, Skinner D. Topologies of Race. Science, Technology, & Human Values 2014;39:468–87. doi:10.1177/0162243913509493
163
Sharma A, Gupta A. Sharma, A. and Gupta, A. (2006) Introduction: Re-thinking Theories of the State in an Age of Globalization. In: The anthropology of the state: a reader. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006.
164
Universitetet i Oslo. State formation: anthropological perspectives. London: : Pluto Press 2005. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt18fs5n7
165
Kirstie Ball ; Kevin D. Haggend David Lyon. Bruno, Fernanda. (2012) Surveillance and Participation on Web 2.0. In: Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. doi:10.4324/9780203814949
166
Lyon D. Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society 2014;1. doi:10.1177/2053951714541861
167
Isin E, Ruppert E. Digital Citizenship and Surveillance| Citizen Snowden. International Journal of Communication 2017;11.http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5642
168
LYON D. BIOMETRICS, IDENTIFICATION AND SURVEILLANCE. Bioethics 2008;22:499–508. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
169
Evelyn Ruppert. Population Objects: Interpassive Subjects. Sociology 2011;45:218–33.http://www.jstor.org/stable/42857535?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
170
Lupton D. Self-tracking modes: relflexive self-monitoring and data practices. Social life of big data symposium 2nd June 2015. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549
171
Fuller M, Goffey A. Leak early, leak often. In: Evil media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2012. 100–4.https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=15040989580004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
172
Vertesi J. My Experiment Opting Out of Big Data Made Me Look Like a Criminal. Time.com 2014;:1–1.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=95911990&site=ehost-live&scope=site
173
Amoore L. Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for Our Times. Theory, Culture & Society 2011;28:24–43. doi:10.1177/0263276411417430
174
Strathern M. Parts and wholes: refiguring relationships in a post-plural world. In: Conceptualizing society. London: : Routledge 1992. 75–106.http://www.tandfebooks.com/ISBN/9780203032244
175
Ruppert E. The Governmental Topologies of Database Devices. Theory, Culture & Society 2012;29:116–36. doi:10.1177/0263276412439428
176
Lyon D. Biometrics, Identification and Surveillance. Bioethics 2008;22:499–508. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00697.x
177
Lyon D. Liquid Surveillance: The Contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to Surveillance Studies1. International Political Sociology 2010;4:325–38. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x
178
Anderson C. The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired. http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/
179
Yuval Noah Harari on big data, Google and the end of free will. Financial Timeshttps://www.ft.com/content/50bb4830-6a4c-11e6-ae5b-a7cc5dd5a28c
180
Anna Tsing. The Global Situation. Cultural Anthropology 2000;15:327–60.http://www.jstor.org/stable/656606?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
181
Coopmans C. Visual analytics as artful revelation. In: Coopmans C, ed. Representation in scientific practice revisited. Cambridge, Massachusetts: : The MIT Press 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qf5hv.6?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
182
Captivating Algorithms: recommender systems as traps. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55eb004ee4b0518639d59d9b/t/5b707506352f5356c8d6e7d2/1534096646595/seaver-captivating-algorithms.pdf
183
Annelise Riles. Infinity within the Brackets. American Ethnologist 1998;25:378–98.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/645790?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
184
Abramson, Allen. (2016) What in/is the world in/of Big Data? Theorizing the Contemporary, Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/833-what-in-is-the-world-is-of-big-data
185
Boellstorff T, Maurer B, editors. Boellstorff, T. (2015) Making Big Data,. In: Data, now bigger and better! Chicago: : Prickly Paradigm Press 2015.
186
Latour B, Jensen P, Venturini T, et al. ‘The whole is always smaller than its parts’ - a digital test of Gabriel Tardes’ monads. The British Journal of Sociology 2012;63:590–615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x
187
Lake RW. Big Data, urban governance, and the ontological politics of hyperindividualism. Big Data & Society 2017;4. doi:10.1177/2053951716682537
188
boyd D, Crawford K. Critical Questions for Big Data. Information, Communication & Society 2012;15:662–79. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
189
Seaver N. The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture & Society 2015;37:1101–9. doi:10.1177/0163443715594102
190
Breiger RL. Scaling down. Big Data & Society 2015;2. doi:10.1177/2053951715602497
191
Kitchin R. Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society 2014;1. doi:10.1177/2053951714528481
192
Strathern M. Partial connections. Updated ed. Walnut Creek, CA: : AltaMira Press 2004.
193
Strathern M. Environments within: An ethnographic commentary on scale. In: Culture, landscape, and the environment: the Linacre lectures, 1997. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2000. 44–71.
194
Strathern M. On Space and Depth. In: Complexities: social studies of knowledge practices. Durham: : Duke University Press 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822383550
195
Marr B. The Difference Between Big Data and a Lot of Data. 21AD.http://data-informed.com/
196
Marcus G. Holism and the Expectations of Critique in Post-1980s Anthropology; Notes and Queries, and an Epilogue. In: Experiments in holism: theory and practice in contemporary anthropology. Chichester, West Sussex: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. 28–46.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444324426
197
Couldry N, Powell A. Big Data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society 2014;1. doi:10.1177/2053951714539277
198
Lash S. Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation? Theory, Culture & Society 2007;24:55–78. doi:10.1177/0263276407075956
199
Bowker GC. The Theory/Data Thing. International Journal of Communication 2014;8.http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2190
200
Beer D, Burrows R. Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data. Theory, Culture & Society 2013;30:47–71. doi:10.1177/0263276413476542
201
Boellstorff T. Making big data, in theory. First Monday 2013;18. doi:10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869
202
Anderson K, Nafus D, Rattenbury T, et al. Numbers Have Qualities Too: Experiences with Ethno-Mining. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 2009;2009:123–40. doi:10.1111/j.1559-8918.2009.tb00133.x
203
Povinelli EA. The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives. differences 2011;22:146–71. doi:10.1215/10407391-1218274
204
Blok A, Carlsen HB, Jørgensen TB, et al. Stitching together the heterogeneous party: A complementary social data science experiment. Big Data & Society 2017;4. doi:10.1177/2053951717736337
205
Mike Savage and Roger Burrows. The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology. Sociology 2007;41:885–99.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/42858273?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
206
Riles A. The network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: : The University of Michigan Press 2000.
207
Ford H. Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society 2014;1. doi:10.1177/2053951714544337
208
Strathern M. The Limits of Auto-anthropology. In: Anthropology at home. London: : Tavistock Publications 1987. 16–37.
209
Seaver N. Algorithms as culture: Some tactics for the ethnography of algorithmic systems. Big Data & Society 2017;4. doi:10.1177/2053951717738104
210
Marres N, Weltevrede E. Scraping the social? Journal of Cultural Economy 2013;6:313–35. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.772070
211
Wendy F. Hsu. Hsu, W.F (2016) A Performative Digital Ethnography. In ‘The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography’ eds. Hjorth, Horst, Galloway, Bell. Routledge. Published Online First: 2016. doi:10.4324/9781315673974.ch4
212
George E. Marcus and Marcelo Pisarro. The End(s) of Ethnography: Social/Cultural Anthropology’s Signature Form of Producing Knowledge in Transition. Cultural Anthropology 2008;23:1–14.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20484493?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
213
Blok A, Pedersen MA. Complementary social science? Quali-quantitative experiments in a Big Data world. Big Data & Society 2014;1. doi:10.1177/2053951714543908
214
Boellstorff T. Rethinking Digital Anthropology. In: Digital anthropology. London: : Berg 2012. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
215
Riles A. The network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: : The University of Michigan Press 2000.
216
Verran H, Christie M, Anbins-King B, et al. Designing digital knowledge management tools with Aboriginal Australians. Digital Creativity 2007;18:129–42. doi:10.1080/14626260701531944
217
Haidy Geismar and William Mohns. Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17.https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23011429?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
218
MARILYN STRATHERN. VIRTUAL SOCIETY? GET REAL! Ashridge 4–5 May 2000: Conference of the ‘Virtual Society?: the Social Science of Electronic Technologies’ Programme: Abstraction and decontextualisation: an anthropological comment. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 2001;22:52–66.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23820353?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
219
Kelty C, Coleman G, Strassler K. Commentary and Discussion on the Digital Form Curated Collection. Curated Collections, Cultural Anthropology Online. 2012.http://www.culanth.org/curated_collections/8-the-digital-form/discussions/15-commentary-and-discussion-on-the-digital-form-curated-collection
220
Strathern M. Chapter 1. In: Property, substance and effect: anthropological essays on persons and things. London: : Athlone 1999.
221
Why Big Data Needs Thick Data – Ethnography Matters – Medium. https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7
222
Ruppert E, Law J, Savage M. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society 2013;30:22–46. doi:10.1177/0263276413484941
223
Nafus D. Data, Data, Everywhere, but Who Gets to Interpret It? | EPIC. EPIC. 2015.https://www.epicpeople.org/data-data-everywhere/
224
» Abildegaard et al (2017) Five recent play dates - EASST. https://easst.net/article/five-recent-play-dates/
225
Publications | Sciences Po | MedialabSciences Po | Medialab. http://www.medialab.sciences-po.fr/publication/
226
Mackenzie A. These Things Called Systems. Social Studies of Science 2003;33:365–87. doi:10.1177/03063127030333003
227
Strathern, M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation; an anthropological comment. http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
228
Seaver N. Studying up: the ethnography of technologists. Ethnography Matters. 2014.http://ethnographymatters.net/blog/2014/03/10/studying-up/
