[1]
A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace: https://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.
[2]
A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace: https://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.
[3]
A Theory of Digital Objects: http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/.
[4]
abanovi , S. 2014. Inventing Japan’s ‘robotics culture’: The repeated assembly of science, technology, and culture in social robotics. Social Studies of Science. 44, 3 (Jun. 2014), 342–367. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713509704.
[5]
Akrich, M. 1992. The De-Scription of Technical Objects. Shaping technology/building society : studies in sociotechnical change / edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law.
[6]
Amiria Salmond Journal of Material Culture. 17, 211–228.
[7]
Amoore, L. Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for our Times. Theory, Culture & Society. 28.
[8]
Anderson, B.R.O. 2006. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
[9]
Anonymous in Context: The Politics and Power behind the Mask: 2013. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/anonymous-context-politics-and-power-behind-mask.
[10]
Arjun Appadurai The Social Life of Things. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Arturo Escobar, David Hess, Isabel Licha, Will Sibley, Marilyn Strathern and Judith Sutz 1994. Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 35, 3 (1994), 211–231.
[12]
Arturo Escobar, David Hess, Isabel Licha, Will Sibley, Marilyn Strathern and Judith Sutz 1994. Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture [and Comments and Reply]. Current Anthropology. 35, 3 (1994), 211–231.
[13]
Askew, K.M. and Wilk, R.R. 2002. The anthropology of media: a reader. Blackwell.
[14]
Axel, B.K. 2006. Anthropology and the New Technologies of Communication. Cultural Anthropology. 21, 3 (Aug. 2006), 354–384. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2006.21.3.354.
[15]
Ballestero, Andrea 151AD. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 21, 1 (151AD), 27–53.
[16]
Barley, S.R. and Orr, J.E. eds. 1997. Between craft and science: technical work in U.S. settings. IRL Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.
[17]
Baym, N.K. 2010. Personal connections in the digital age. Polity.
[18]
Berry, D.M. 2004. Internet research: privacy, ethics and alienation: an open source approach. Internet Research. 14, 4 (Sep. 2004), 323–332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240410555333.
[19]
Big data needs thick data. Ethnography Matters, posted 13 May 2013: http://ethnographymatters.net/2013/05/13/big-data-needs-thick-data/.
[20]
Big Data, Thick Description and Political Expediency| Paul Stoller: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-stoller/big-data-thick-descrption_b_3450623.html.
[21]
Blackwell, A. 2014. Structuring the Social: Inside Software Design. Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design. MIT Press.
[22]
Blanchette, J.-F. 2011. A material history of bits. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62, 6 (Jun. 2011), 1042–1057. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21542.
[23]
Bloch, Maurice 2005. Essays on cultural transmission. Berg.
[24]
Bloomsbury - Consuming Media: http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/consuming-media-9781847886057/.
[25]
Boellstorff, T. 2012. ‘Chapter 2: Rethinking Digital Anthropology’. Digital anthropology. Berg.
[26]
Boellstorff, T. 2012. Chapter 8: Ethics. Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of method. Princeton University Press.
[27]
Boellstorff, T. 2012. ‘Chapter 9: Human Subjects Clearance and Institutional. Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of method. Princeton University Press.
[28]
Boellstorff, T. 2008. Coming of age in Second Life: an anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton University Press.
[29]
Boellstorff, T. 2013. Making big data, in theory. First Monday. 18, 10 (Oct. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869.
[30]
Bollier, D. 2009. Viral spiral. New Press.
[31]
Bowrey, K. and Anderson, J. 2009. The Politics of Global Information Sharing: Whose Cultural Agendas Are Being Advanced? Social & Legal Studies. 18, 4 (Dec. 2009), 479–504. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663909345095.
[32]
Boyle, J. 2008. The second enclosure movement. The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind. Yale University Press.
[33]
Boyne, R. 2006. Classification. Theory, Culture & Society. 23, 2–3 (May 2006), 21–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406062529.
[34]
Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. 2002. The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press.
[35]
Bruno Latour 2004. Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry. 30, 2 (2004), 225–248.
[36]
Bryan Pfaffenberger 1992. Technological Dramas. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 17, 3 (1992), 282–312.
[37]
Buchli, V. 2010. The prototype: presencing the immaterial. Visual Communication. 9, 3 (Aug. 2010), 273–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357210372718.
[38]
Budka, P. 2011. From Cyber to Digital Anthropology to an Anthropology of the Contemporary.
[39]
Callon, M. 1998. The laws of the markets: edited by Michel Callon. Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review.
[40]
Callon, M. 2005. Why Virtualism paves the way to political impotence: A reply to Daniel Miller’s critique of the laws of the markets. Microsoft Word - newsletter_2.doc - esfeb05.pdf. (2005).
[41]
Cameron, F. and Kenderdine, S. 2007. Theorizing digital cultural heritage: a critical discourse. MIT Press.
[42]
Candea, M. and AlcaynaâStevens, L. 2012. Internal Others: Ethnographies of Naturalism. Cambridge Anthropology. 30, 2 (Dec. 2012), 36–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300203.
[43]
Carpo, M. 2011. The alphabet and the algorithm. MIT Press. 51–80.
[44]
Carrier, J.G. and Miller, D. 1998. Virtualism: a new political economy. Berg.
[45]
Castaneda, C. and Suchman, L. 2014. Robot visions. Social Studies of Science. 44, 3 (Jun. 2014), 315–341. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713511868.
[46]
Castells, M. 2012. Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the Internet age. Polity.
[47]
Castells, M. 1996. The Net and the Self: Working notes for a critical theory of the informational society. Critique of Anthropology. 16, 1 (Mar. 1996), 9–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9601600103.
[48]
Chan, A. 2004. Coding Free Software, Coding Free States: Free Software Legislation and the Politics of Code in Peru. Anthropological Quarterly. 77, 3 (2004), 531–545. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2004.0046.
[49]
Christen, K. 2009. Access and Accountability: The Ecology of Information Sharing in the Digital Age. Anthropology News. 50, 4 (Apr. 2009), 4–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-3502.2009.50404.x.
[50]
Christen, K. 2005. Gone Digital: Aboriginal Remix and the Cultural Commons. International Journal of Cultural Property. 12, 03 (Aug. 2005). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739105050186.
[51]
Christie, M. and Verran, H. 2014. Postcolonial Databasing? Subverting old appropriations, developing new associations. Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design. MIT Press.
[52]
Codev2:Lawrence Lessig: http://codev2.cc/.
[53]
Coleman, E.G. 2013. Coding freedom: the ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton University Press.
[54]
Coleman, E.G. 2010. Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media. Annual Review of Anthropology. 39, 1 (Oct. 2010), 487–505. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945.
[55]
Coleman, E.G. and Golub, A. 2008. Hacker practice: Moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism. Anthropological Theory. 8, 3 (Sep. 2008), 255–277. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093814.
[56]
Coleman, G. 2011. Hacker Politics and Publics. Public Culture. 23, 3 65 (Oct. 2011), 511–516. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1336390.
[57]
Coleman, Gabriella 2009. Code is speech: legal tinkering, expertise, and protest among free and open source software developers. Cultural Anthropology. 24, 3 (Aug. 2009), 420–454. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01036.x.
[58]
Coombe, R. Your Second Life? Goodwill and the Performativity of Intellectual Property in Online Digital Gaming.
[59]
Coombe, R.J. 2001. Culture Wars on the Net: Intellectual Property and Corporate Propriety in Digital Environments. South Atlantic Quarterly. 100, 4 (Oct. 2001), 919–947. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-100-4-919.
[60]
Coombe, R.J. and Herman, A. 2004. Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web. Anthropological Quarterly. 77, 3 (2004), 559–574. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2004.0037.
[61]
Coopmans, C. ed. 2014. Visual Analytics as Artful Revelation. Representation in scientific practice revisited. The MIT Press.
[62]
Couldry, N. 2003. Media rituals: a critical approach. Routledge.
[63]
Dag Elgesem et al Internet Research Ethics.
[64]
Dawn Nafus 2014. Big Data, Big Questions| This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice. International Journal of Communication. 8, (2014).
[65]
Digital Sit-ins: DDOS is legitimate civil disobedience - Anonymous: We are legion.: 2012. .
[66]
Does Information Really Want to be Free? Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness | Christen | International Journal of Communication: 2012. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1618.
[67]
Dor, D. et al. 2014. The social origins of language. Oxford University Press.
[68]
Downey, G. 2001. Virtual Webs, Physical Technologies, and Hidden Workers: The Spaces of Labor in Information Internetworks. Technology and Culture. 42, 2 (2001), 209–235. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2001.0058.
[69]
Downey, G.L. et al. 1995. Cyborg Anthropology. Cultural Anthropology. 10, 2 (May 1995), 264–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1995.10.2.02a00060.
[70]
Edited By Faye D. Ginsburg, Lila Abu-Lughod, And Brian Larkin. 23AD. Media worlds. University Of California Press.
[71]
Eduardo Viveiros de Castro 1998. Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 4, 3 (1998), 469–488.
[72]
Elizabeth A. Povinelli 2011. The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives. differences. 22, 1 (Jan. 2011), 146–171. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1218274 10.1215/10407391-1218274.
[73]
Evens, A. and Aden Evens 2012. Web 2.0 and the Ontology of the Digital. Digital Humanities Quarterly. 006, 2 (Jul. 2012).
[74]
Flexible Capitalism : BERGHAHN BOOKS : Oxford, New York : Celebrating 21 Years of Independent Publishing! http://www.berghahnbooks.com/title.php?rowtag=KjaerulffFlexible.
[75]
Ford, H. 2014. Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists. Big Data & Society. 1, 2 (Jul. 2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714544337.
[76]
Freeman, C. 2000. High tech and high heels in the global economy: women, work, and pink-collar identities in the Caribbean. Duke University Press.
[77]
Geertz, C. 2000. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books.
[78]
Geismar, H. 2012. Museum+Digital = ?. Digital anthropology. Berg.
[79]
Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Clarendon Press.
[80]
Geoffrey C. Bowker 2000. Biodiversity Datadiversity. Social Studies of Science. 30, 5 (2000), 643–683.
[81]
Gerbaudo, P. 2012. Tweets and the streets: social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
[82]
Gerlitz, C. and Lury, C. 2014. Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory. 15, 2 (May 2014), 174–188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267.
[83]
Ghosh, Rishab Aiyer 2005. CODE: collaborative ownership and the digital economy. MIT Press.
[84]
Gibson, J.J. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press.
[85]
Gimblett, B.K. 1991. Objects of Ethnography. Exhibiting cultures: the poetics and politics of museum display. Smithsonian Institution Press. 386–443.
[86]
Ginsburg, F. 2012. Disability in the Digital Age. Digital anthropology. Berg.
[87]
Gitelman, L. 2013. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. MIT Press.
[88]
Gitelman, L. 2013. ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. MIT Press.
[89]
Glass, A. and Keramidas, K. 2011. On the Relational Exhibition in Analog and Digital Media. Objects of exchange: social and material transformation on the late nineteenth-century Northwest Coast : selections from the American Museum of Natural History. Bard Graduate Center: Decorative Arts, Design History, Material Culture. 215–226.
[90]
Goffman, E. 1990. The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin.
[91]
Golub, A. and Lingley, K. 2008. ‘Just Like the Qing Empire’: Internet Addiction, MMOGs, and Moral Crisis in Contemporary China. Games and Culture. 3, 1 (Jan. 2008), 59–75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412007309526.
[92]
Gray, C.H. and Driscoll, M. 1992. What’s Real About Virtual Reality?: Anthropology of, and in, Cyberspace. Visual Anthropology Review. 8, 2 (Sep. 1992), 39–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1992.8.2.39.
[93]
Grimes, S.M. and Feenberg, A. 2013. Ch. 8: Critical Theory of Technology. The SAGE handbook of digital technology research. S. Price et al., eds. Sage.
[94]
Gunn, W. and Smith, R.C. 2013. Design anthropology: theory and practice. Bloomsbury.
[95]
Hacking, I. 1990. The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press.
[96]
Haidy Geismar 2011. Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 17, (2011).
[97]
Hakken, D. 1993. Computing and Social Change: New Technology and Workplace Transformation, 1980-1990. Annual Review of Anthropology. 22, 1 (Oct. 1993), 107–132. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.22.100193.000543.
[98]
Hakken, D. 2000. Resocialing work? Anticipatory anthropology of the labor process. Futures. 32, 8 (Oct. 2000), 767–775. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00027-6.
[99]
Haraway, D. 1991. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Free Association. 149–181.
[100]
Haraway, D.J. 1991. A Cyborg manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. Free Association. 149–182.
[101]
Haraway, D.J. 1997. Chapter 4 - "Gene”. ModestâWitness@SecondâMillennium.FemaleManâMeetsâOncoMouse: feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
[102]
Harvey, P. and Knox, H. 2014. Objects and materials: An introduction. Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. Routledge. 1–17.
[103]
Helmreich, S. 2011. Nature/Culture/Seawater. American Anthropologist. 113, 1 (Mar. 2011), 132–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01311.x.
[104]
Henderson, K. 1991. Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering. Science, Technology & Human Values. 16, 4 (Oct. 1991), 448–473. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600402.
[105]
Herbert Alexander Simon 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press.
[106]
Hewlett, B.S. ed. 2014. Hunter-gatherers of the Congo Basin: cultures, histories and biology of African Pygmies. Transaction Publishers.
[107]
Holmes, D. and Marcus, G. 2005. Cultures of Expertise and the Management of Globalization: Toward the Re-functioning of Ethnography. Global assemblages : technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems / edited by Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier.
[108]
Hornborg, A. 2001. Symbolic technologies: Machines and the Marxian notion of fetishism. Anthropological Theory. 1, 4 (Dec. 2001), 473–496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/14634990122228854.
[109]
Horst, H.A. and Miller, D. 2006. The cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Berg.
[110]
Horst, Heather A. and Miller, Daniel 2012. Design Anthropology: Working on, with and for, Digital Technologies. Digital anthropology. Berg.
[111]
Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.
[112]
Hutchins, E. and Klausen, T. 1998. Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge University Press.
[113]
Ingold, T. 2013. Making: anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Routledge.
[114]
Ingold, T. 2011. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
[115]
Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices & Challenges in a Networked World: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2011/02/156619.htm.
[116]
Isaac, G. 2008. Technology Becomes the Object: The Use of Electronic Media at the National Museum of the American Indian. Journal of Material Culture. 13, 3 (Nov. 2008), 287–310. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183508095497.
[117]
J. David Bolter 1999. Remediation. MIT Press.
[118]
Julian Dibbell » A Rape in Cyberspace: http://www.juliandibbell.com/articles/a-rape-in-cyberspace/.
[119]
Julie E. Cohen 2012. Configuring the networked self. Yale University Press.
[120]
Juris, J.S. 2012. Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist. 39, 2 (May 2012), 259–279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x.
[121]
Juris, J.S. 2005. The New Digital Media and Activist Networking within Anti-Corporate Globalization Movements. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 597, 1 (Jan. 2005), 189–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204270338.
[122]
Kaptelinin, Victor and Nardi, Bonnie A. 2006. Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.
[123]
Katherine Hayles Prologue and Chapter 1: Toward embodied virtuality. How we became posthuman : virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics / N. Katherine Hayles. 1–24.
[124]
Kelty, C.M. 2008. Chapter 1: Geeks and Recursive Publics in Two bits: the cultural significance of free software. Duke University Press.
[125]
Kelty, C.M. 2008. Two bits: the cultural significance of free software. Duke University Press.
[126]
Kirksey, S. and Helmreich, S. The emergence of multispecies ethnography.
[127]
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. 1996. The electronic vernacular. Connected: engagements with media. University of Chicago Press.
[128]
Kjeldskov, J. and Skov, M.B. 2014. Was it worth the hassle? Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services - MobileHCI ’14 (2014), 43–52.
[129]
Knox, H. et al. 2007. Transformative capacity, information technology, and the making of business ‘experts’. The Sociological Review. 55, 1 (Jan. 2007), 22–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00679.x.
[130]
Kockleman, P. The Anthropology of an Equation: Sieves, spam filters, agentive algorithms, and ontologies of transformation. HAU: journal of ethnographic theory.
[131]
Landow, G.P. and Landow, G.P. 2006. Hypertext 3.0: critical theory and new media in an era of globalization. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[132]
Larkin, B. 2008. Signal and noise: media, infrastructure, and urban culture in Nigeria. Duke University Press.
[133]
Larson, F. et al. 2007. Social Networks and the Creation of the Pitt Rivers Museum. Journal of Material Culture. 12, 3 (Nov. 2007), 211–239. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183507081886.
[134]
Latour, B. 1999. Chapter 2 - "Circulating Reference. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
[135]
Latour, B. 1993. Crisis. We have never been modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf. 1–12.
[136]
Latour, B. 1992. Where are the Missing Masses: The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. MIT Press.
[137]
Law, John 1991. A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. Routledge.
[138]
Lawrence Lessig Code. Basic Books.
[139]
Leach, J. et al. 2009. Freedom Imagined: Morality and Aesthetics in Open Source Software Design. Ethnos. 74, 1 (Mar. 2009), 51–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840902751188.
[140]
Leach, J. and Wilson, L. 2014. Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design. MIT Press.
[141]
Leahu, L. and Sengers, P. 2014. Freaky. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS ’14 (2014), 607–616.
[142]
Lewis, J. 2014. Making the invisible visible: Designing technology for nonliterate hunter-gatherers. Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design. MIT Press.
[143]
Lupton, D. The digital cyborg assemblage: Haraway’s cyborg theory and the new digital health technologies.
[144]
Lupton, D. 2013. Understanding the Human Machine [Commentary]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine. 32, 4 (Winter 2013), 25–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2013.2286431.
[145]
Mackenzie, A. 2012. More parts than elements: how databases multiply. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 30, 2 (2012), 335–350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1068/d6710.
[146]
Madianou, M. and Miller, D. 2012. Migration and new media: transnational families and polymedia. Routledge.
[147]
Malaby, T.M. 2009. Making virtual worlds: Linden Lab and Second Life. Cornell University Press.
[148]
Manovich, L. 2001. What is New Media. The language of new media. MIT Press. 27–61.
[149]
Martin, E. 2007. Bipolar expeditions: mania and depression in American culture. Princeton University Press.
[150]
Martin, E. 1994. Flexible bodies: tracking immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Beacon Press.
[151]
Matthewman, S. 2011. Technology and social theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
[152]
Mauss, M. 1985. ‘A category of the human mind: the notion of person; the notion of self.’ (trs W.D. Halls). The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge University Press.
[153]
McLuhan, M. 1997. The medium is the message. Understanding media: the extensions of man. Routledge.
[154]
Miller, D. Reply to Michel Callon. Elites and EU Enlargement - esjuly05.pdf.
[155]
Miller, D. 1992. The young and the restless in Trinidad: a case of the local and the global in mass consumption. Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge. 163–182.
[156]
Miller, D. 2002. Turning Callon the right way up. Economy and Society. 31, 2 (Jan. 2002), 218–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140220123135.
[157]
Miller, D. and Sinanan, J. 2014. Webcam. Polity Press.
[158]
Miller, D. and Slater, D. 2000. The internet: an ethnographic approach. Berg.
[159]
Miller, D. and Slater, D. 2000. The internet: an ethnographic approach. Berg.
[160]
Miller, Daniel and Horst, Heather A. 2012. Digital anthropology. Berg.
[161]
Mirca Madianou and Miller, D. Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies,. 16, 169–187.
[162]
Morozov, E. 2011. The net delusion: how not to liberate the world. Allen Lane.
[163]
Myers, F. 2004. Ontologies of the image and economies of exchange. American Ethnologist. 31, 1 (Feb. 2004), 5–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2004.31.1.5.
[164]
Nardi, B.A. 2010. My life as a night elf priest: an anthropological account of World of warcraft. University of Michigan Press.
[165]
Nardi, B.A. 2010. My life as a night elf priest: an anthropological account of World of warcraft. University of Michigan Press.
[166]
Negroponte, N. 1996. Being digital. Coronet.
[167]
Negroponte, Nicholas 1995. Being digital. Vintage Books.
[168]
Orlikowski, W. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations.
[169]
Orr, J.E. 1996. Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. ILR Press.
[170]
Our Weirdness Is Free - Triple Canopy: 2012. .
[171]
Parry, R. 2007. Recoding the museum: digital heritage and the technologies of change. Routledge.
[172]
Parry, R. 2011. Transfer Protocols: Museum Codes and Ethics in the New Digital Environment. Routledge companion to museum ethics: redefining ethics for the twenty-first-century museum. Routledge. 316–331.
[173]
Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation - viewcontent.cgi: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=tipiti.
[174]
Phillips, R.B. 2011. Museum pieces: toward the indigenization of Canadian museums. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
[175]
Poster, M. 1990. The mode of information: poststructuralism and social context. University of Chicago Press.
[176]
Rheingold, H. 2000. The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press.
[177]
Riles, A. 2001. The network inside out: Annelise Riles. University of Michigan Press.
[178]
Rode, J.A. 2011. Reflexivity in digital anthropology. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’11 (2011).
[179]
Rogers, Y. et al. 2013. Contrasting Lab Based and In the Wild Studies for Evaluating Multi-User Technologies. The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research. S. Price et al., eds. Sage. 359–373.
[180]
Rogers, Y. 2011. Interaction design gone wild. interactions. 18, 4 (Jul. 2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1978822.1978834.
[181]
Ross, A. 2004. No-collar: the humane workplace and its hidden costs. Temple University Press.
[182]
Routes/Worlds | e-flux: http://www.e-flux.com/journal/routesworlds/.
[183]
Sahlins, M.D. 2004. The Original Affluent Society’. Stone Age economics. Routledge.
[184]
Sarah Franklin 1995. Science as Culture, Cultures of Science. Annual Review of Anthropology. 24, (1995), 163–184.
[185]
Scheldeman, G. 2010. Technokids? Insulin Pumps Incorporated in Young People’s Bodies and Lives. Technologized images, technologized bodies. Berghahn Books.
[186]
Schüll, N.D. 2012. Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press.
[187]
Seaver, N. Bastard Algebra. Data: Now Bigger and Better!, Bell, Boellstorff, Gregg.
[188]
Selling Your Self in the United States | Ilana Gershon - Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/9058981/Selling_Your_Self_in_the_United_States.
[189]
Sennett, R. 1998. The corrosion of character: the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. W. W. Norton.
[190]
Shklovski, I. and Valtysson, B. 2012. Secretly Political: Civic Engagement in Online Publics in Kazakhstan. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 56, 3 (Jul. 2012), 417–433. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.705196.
[191]
Shore, C. and Wright, S. 2000. Coercive Accountability: The Rise in Audit Culture in Higher Education. Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. Routledge. 57–89.
[192]
Smith, M.R. 1994. Technological Determinism in American Culture. Does Technology Drive History?. Mit Pr.
[193]
Snodgrass, J.G. et al. 2013. A formal anthropological view of motivation models of problematic MMO play: Achievement, social, and immersion factors in the context of culture. Transcultural Psychiatry. 50, 2 (Apr. 2013), 235–262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461513487666.
[194]
Sreberny, A. and Khiabany, G. 2010. Blogistan: the internet and politics in Iran. I.B. Tauris.
[195]
Srinivasan, R. et al. 2009. Digital Museums and Diverse Cultural Knowledges: Moving Past the Traditional Catalog. The Information Society. 25, 4 (Jul. 2009), 265–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240903028714.
[196]
Srinivasan, R. et al. 2010. Diverse Knowledges and Contact Zones within the Digital Museum. Science, Technology & Human Values. 35, 5 (Sep. 2010), 735–768. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909357755.
[197]
Stefan Helmreich 2011. From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures. Social Research. 78, 4 (2011), 1211–1242.
[198]
Sterne, J. 2006. The mp3 as cultural artifact. New Media & Society. 8, 5 (Oct. 2006), 825–842. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806067737.
[199]
Strathern, M. 1992. Reproducing the future: essays on anthropology, kinship, and the new reproductive technologies. Routledge.
[200]
Suchman, L. 2007. Ch. 4: Interactive artifacts. Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press. 33–50.
[201]
Suchman, L. and Viseu, A. 2010. Wearable Augmentations: Imaginaries of the Informed Body. Technologized images, technologized bodies. Berghahn Books.
[202]
Tacchi, J. 1997. Radio Texture: Between Self and others. Material cultures: why some things matter. University College London Press. 25–45.
[203]
Taussig, M.T. 1993. Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. Routledge.
[204]
Technologies of Choice? | The MIT Press: http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/technologies-choice-0.
[205]
The Cathedral and the Bazaar: http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/.
[206]
The GNU Manifesto - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF): 1985. .
[207]
The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions � Cultural Anthropology: http://www.culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-%20politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions.
[208]
The Virtual Community: Table of Contents: http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book/.
[209]
The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm.
[210]
Thorner, S. Collections: A Journal for Museums and Archives Professionals. Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals | Rowman & Littlefield.
[211]
Tom Boellstorff 2003. Dubbing Culture: Indonesian ‘Gay’ and ‘Lesbi’ Subjectivities and Ethnography in an Already Globalized World. American Ethnologist. 30, 2 (2003), 225–242.
[212]
Tsing, A. 2000. Inside the Economy of Appearances. Public Culture. 12, 1 (Jan. 2000), 115–144.
[213]
Turkle, S. 2005. The second self: computers and the human spirit. MIT Press.
[214]
Verran, H. 2012. number. Inventive methods: the happening of the social. C. Lury and N. Wakeford, eds. Routledge.
[215]
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2013. The relative native. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 3, 3 (Dec. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.032.
[216]
Wallman, S. and Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth 1979. Social anthropology of work. Academic Press.
[217]
Warner, M. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture. 14, 1 (Jan. 2002), 49–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49.
[218]
Wendy Nelson Espeland 2007. Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds1. American Journal of Sociology. 113, 1 (2007), 1–40.
[219]
Whole Earth Catalog Fall 1968 - Electronic Edition: http://www.wholeearth.com/issue-electronic-edition.php?iss=1010.
[220]
Wiebe E. Bijker and Thomas P. Hughes The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press.
[221]
Wilson, S.M. and Peterson, L.C. 2002. The Anthropology of Online Communities. Annual Review of Anthropology. 31, 1 (Oct. 2002), 449–467. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436.
[222]
Wittel, A. 2001. Toward a Network Sociality. Theory, Culture & Society. 18, 6 (Dec. 2001), 51–76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/026327601018006003.
[223]
Words, Ontologies and Aboriginal Databases: 2005. .
[224]
Zaloom, C. 2006. Markets and Machines: Work in the Technological Sensoryscapes of Finance. American Quarterly. 58, 3 (2006), 815–837. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2006.0072.
[225]
Zeitlyn, D. 2012. Anthropology in and of the Archives: Possible Futures and Contingent Pasts. Archives as Anthropological Surrogates*. Annual Review of Anthropology. 41, 1 (Oct. 2012), 461–480. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145721.
[226]
budka_contemporary.pdf.
[227]
Community Mapping by Non-literate Citizen Scientists in the Rainforest.
[228]
2010. Digital Expertise in Online Journalism (and Anthropology). Anthropological Quarterly. 83, 1 (2010), 73–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.0.0114.
[229]
Making local knowledge matter: Supporting non-literate people to monitor poaching in Congo - a1-vitos.pdf.
[230]
Media Worlds. University of California Press.
[231]
Microsoft Word - Manovich_rev2.doc - manovich-lev_rev2.pdf.
[232]
2000. Modernism’s Media and the End of Mediumship? On the Aesthetic Economy of Transparency in Thailand. Public Culture. 12, 2 (Jan. 2000), 457–475.
[233]
Reclaiming Virtual and Physical Spaces, Marion Hamm.
[234]
2014. Taking Participatory Citizen Science to Extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 13, 2 (Apr. 2014), 20–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.37.
[235]
Technological Leap-Frogging in the Congo Basin, Pygmies and Global Positioning Systems in Central Africa: What has happened and where is it going’.
[236]
2010. Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept. Technology and Culture. 51, 3 (2010), 561–577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2010.0009.
