[1]
E. G. Coleman, ‘Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 487–505, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945.
[2]
Miller, Daniel and Horst, Heather A., Digital anthropology. London: Berg, 2012.
[3]
‘budka_contemporary.pdf’. [Online]. Available: http://www.media-anthropology.net/file/budka_contemporary.pdf
[4]
Arturo Escobar, David Hess, Isabel Licha, Will Sibley, Marilyn Strathern and Judith Sutz, ‘Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture [and Comments and Reply]’, Current Anthropology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 211–231, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/2744194?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[5]
Arjun Appadurai, The Social Life of Things. Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Bloch, Maurice, Essays on cultural transmission, vol. London School of Economics monographs on social anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 2005.
[7]
J. David Bolter, Remediation. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1999.
[8]
Media Worlds. University of California Press.
[9]
Julie E. Cohen, Configuring the networked self. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
[10]
Wiebe E. Bijker and Thomas P. Hughes, The Social Construction of Technological Systems. MIT Press.
[11]
Law, John, A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination, vol. Sociological review monograph. London: Routledge, 1991.
[12]
B. Latour, ‘Where are the Missing Masses: The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’, in Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change, vol. Inside technology, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1992.
[13]
Lawrence Lessig, Code. New York, USA: Basic Books.
[14]
J. Sterne, ‘The mp3 as cultural artifact’, New Media & Society, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 825–842, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461444806067737.
[15]
Kaptelinin, Victor and Nardi, Bonnie A., Acting with technology: activity theory and interaction design, vol. Acting with technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2006.
[16]
‘Internet Rights and Wrongs: Choices & Challenges in a Networked World’. [Online]. Available: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2011/02/156619.htm
[17]
‘A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace’. [Online]. Available: https://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html
[18]
‘Whole Earth Catalog Fall 1968 - Electronic Edition’. [Online]. Available: http://www.wholeearth.com/issue-electronic-edition.php?iss=1010
[19]
Negroponte, Nicholas, Being digital. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
[20]
‘The Virtual Community: Table of Contents’. [Online]. Available: http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book/
[21]
M. R. Smith, ‘Technological Determinism in American Culture’, in Does Technology Drive History?, Mit Pr, 1994.
[22]
‘Technologies of Choice? | The MIT Press’. [Online]. Available: http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/technologies-choice-0
[23]
Herbert Alexander Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6267338
[24]
‘Bloomsbury - Consuming Media’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/consuming-media-9781847886057/
[25]
Arturo Escobar, David Hess, Isabel Licha, Will Sibley, Marilyn Strathern and Judith Sutz, ‘Welcome to Cyberia: Notes on the Anthropology of Cyberculture [and Comments and Reply]’, Current Anthropology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 211–231, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2744194
[26]
P. Budka, ‘From Cyber to Digital Anthropology to an Anthropology of the Contemporary’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.media-anthropology.net/file/budka_contemporary.pdf
[27]
‘Technology: The Emergence of a Hazardous Concept’, Technology and Culture, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 561–577, 2010, doi: 10.1353/tech.2010.0009.
[28]
C. Geertz, The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=acls;idno=heb01005.0001.001
[29]
S. M. Grimes and A. Feenberg, ‘Ch. 8: Critical Theory of Technology’, in The SAGE handbook of digital technology research, S. Price, C. Jewitt, and B. Brown, Eds. London: Sage, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/the-sage-handbook-of-digital-technology-research
[30]
D. J. Haraway, ‘A Cyborg manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’, in Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature, London: Free Association, 1991, pp. 149–182 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203873106
[31]
A. Hornborg, ‘Symbolic technologies: Machines and the Marxian notion of fetishism’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 473–496, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1177/14634990122228854.
[32]
S. Matthewman, Technology and social theory, vol. Traditions in social theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
[33]
Bryan Pfaffenberger, ‘Technological Dramas’, Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 282–312, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/690096
[34]
J. A. Rode, ‘Reflexivity in digital anthropology’, in Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’11, 2011, doi: 10.1145/1978942.1978961 [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1978942.1978961
[35]
T. Wang, ‘Big data needs thick data. Ethnography Matters, posted 13 May 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://ethnographymatters.net/2013/05/13/big-data-needs-thick-data/
[36]
Dawn Nafus, ‘Big Data, Big Questions| This One Does Not Go Up To 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice’, International Journal of Communication, vol. 8, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2170
[37]
L. Leahu and P. Sengers, ‘Freaky’, in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems - DIS ’14, 2014, pp. 607–616, doi: 10.1145/2598510.2600879 [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2598510.2600879
[38]
H. Verran, ‘number’, in Inventive methods: the happening of the social, vol. Culture, economy and the social, C. Lury and N. Wakeford, Eds. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012.
[39]
Ballestero, Andrea, ‘Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies’, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 27–53, 151AD [Online]. Available: http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/1539235079?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
[40]
T. Boellstorff, ‘Making big data, in theory’, First Monday, vol. 18, no. 10, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.5210/fm.v18i10.4869.
[41]
L. Gitelman, ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, vol. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327
[42]
Wendy Nelson Espeland, ‘Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds1’, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1–40, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/517897
[43]
H. Ford, ‘Big Data and Small: Collaborations between ethnographers and data scientists’, Big Data & Society, vol. 1, no. 2, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714544337.
[44]
I. Hacking, The taming of chance, vol. Ideas in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[45]
Stefan Helmreich, ‘From Spaceship Earth to Google Ocean: Planetary Icons, Indexes, and Infrastructures’, Social Research, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1211–1242, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23349849?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[46]
J. Lewis, ‘Making the invisible visible: Designing technology for nonliterate hunter-gatherers’, in Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design, vol. Infrastructures series, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262322492
[47]
C. Gerlitz and C. Lury, ‘Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: on numbers, orderings and values’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 174–188, May 2014, doi: 10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267.
[48]
P. Stoller, ‘Big Data, Thick Description and Political Expediency| Paul Stoller’. [Online]. Available: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-stoller/big-data-thick-descrption_b_3450623.html
[49]
T. Boellstorff, ‘“Chapter 2: Rethinking Digital Anthropology”’, in Digital anthropology, London: Berg, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
[50]
D. Miller, ‘Turning Callon the right way up’, Economy and Society, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 218–233, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1080/03085140220123135.
[51]
M. Callon, ‘Why Virtualism paves the way to political impotence: A reply to Daniel Miller’s critique of the laws of the markets’, Microsoft Word - newsletter_2.doc - esfeb05.pdf, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://econsoc.mpifg.de/archive/esfeb05.pdf
[52]
D. Miller, ‘Reply to Michel Callon’, Elites and EU Enlargement - esjuly05.pdf [Online]. Available: http://econsoc.mpifg.de/archive/esjuly05.pdf
[53]
W. Benjamin, ‘The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction.’ [Online]. Available: https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm
[54]
T. Boellstorff, Coming of age in Second Life: an anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvc77h1s
[55]
M. Callon, The laws of the markets: edited by Michel Callon, vol. Sociological review monograph series. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review, 1998.
[56]
J. G. Carrier and D. Miller, Virtualism: a new political economy. Oxford: Berg, 1998.
[57]
C. H. Gray and M. Driscoll, ‘What’s Real About Virtual Reality?: Anthropology of, and in, Cyberspace’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 39–49, Sep. 1992, doi: 10.1525/var.1992.8.2.39.
[58]
D. Miller and D. Slater, The internet: an ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg, 2000.
[59]
B. A. Nardi, My life as a night elf priest: an anthropological account of World of warcraft, vol. Technologies of the imagination. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472026715/
[60]
H. Rheingold, The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier, Rev. ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.
[61]
M. T. Taussig, Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. New York: Routledge, 1993.
[62]
A. Tsing, ‘Inside the Economy of Appearances’, Public Culture, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 115–144, Jan. 2000 [Online]. Available: https://muse-jhu-edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/journals/public_culture/v012/12.1tsing.html
[63]
S. M. Wilson and L. C. Peterson, ‘The Anthropology of Online Communities’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 449–467, Oct. 2002, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085436.
[64]
Bruno Latour, ‘Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225–248, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/421123
[65]
M. Poster, The mode of information: poststructuralism and social context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
[66]
D. Haraway, ‘A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s’, in Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature, London: Free Association, 1991, pp. 149–181.
[67]
C. Castaneda and L. Suchman, ‘Robot visions’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 315–341, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0306312713511868.
[68]
L. Suchman and A. Viseu, ‘Wearable Augmentations: Imaginaries of the Informed Body’, in Technologized images, technologized bodies, New York: Berghahn Books, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1337807
[69]
M. Akrich, ‘The De-Scription of Technical Objects’, in Shaping technology/building society : studies in sociotechnical change / edited by Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law., 1992 [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg114643604&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg114643604&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=0&frbg=&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL_LMS_DS%29&tab=local&dstmp=1415788466910&srt=rank&mode=Basic&&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=Shaping%20Technology%2FBuilding%20Society&vid=UCL_VU1
[70]
G. L. Downey, J. Dumit, and S. Williams, ‘Cyborg Anthropology’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 264–269, May 1995, doi: 10.1525/can.1995.10.2.02a00060.
[71]
Sarah Franklin, ‘Science as Culture, Cultures of Science’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 24, pp. 163–184, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155934
[72]
P. Harvey and H. Knox, ‘Objects and materials: An introduction’, in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion, vol. Culture, economy and the social, London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 1–17 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8286bceb-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[73]
Katherine Hayles, ‘Prologue and Chapter 1: Toward embodied virtuality’, in How we became posthuman : virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics / N. Katherine Hayles., pp. 1–24 [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg114655110&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg114655110&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=0&frbg=&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL_LMS_DS%29&tab=local&dstmp=1415788714447&srt=rank&mode=Basic&&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=How%20We%20Became%20Posthuman%3A%20Virtual%20Bodies%20in%20Cybernetics%2C%20Literature%2C%20and%20Informatics&vid=UCL_VU1
[74]
S. Helmreich, ‘Nature/Culture/Seawater’, American Anthropologist, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 132–144, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01311.x.
[75]
E. Hutchins and T. Klausen, ‘Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit’, in Cognition and communication at work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[76]
S. Kirksey and S. Helmreich, ‘The emergence of multispecies ethnography.’ [Online]. Available: http://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/hub/search/?journal-doi=10.1111%2F%28ISSN%291548-1360&q=The+emergence+of+multispecies+ethnography.
[77]
B. Latour, ‘Crisis’, in We have never been modern, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993, pp. 1–12 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=03951b25-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[78]
D. Lupton, ‘Understanding the Human Machine [Commentary]’, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 25–30, Winter 2013, doi: 10.1109/MTS.2013.2286431.
[79]
D. Lupton, ‘The digital cyborg assemblage: Haraway’s cyborg theory and the new digital health technologies’, [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/3563155/The_digital_cyborg_assemblage_Haraways_cyborg_theory_and_the_new_digital_health_technologies
[80]
S. abanovi , ‘Inventing Japan’s “robotics culture”: The repeated assembly of science, technology, and culture in social robotics’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 342–367, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0306312713509704.
[81]
G. Scheldeman, ‘Technokids? Insulin Pumps Incorporated in Young People’s Bodies and Lives’, in Technologized images, technologized bodies, New York: Berghahn Books, 2010.
[82]
S. Turkle, The second self: computers and the human spirit, 20th anniversary ed., 1st MIT Press ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6267347
[83]
Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, ‘Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 469–488, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3034157
[84]
L. Suchman, ‘Ch. 4: Interactive artifacts’, in Human-machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions, 2nd ed., New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 33–50 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1cf30cce-5c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[85]
C. M. Kelty, Chapter 1: Geeks and Recursive Publics in Two bits: the cultural significance of free software, vol. Experimental futures. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822389002
[86]
L. Manovich, ‘What is New Media’, in The language of new media, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001, pp. 27–61.
[87]
B. R. O. Anderson, Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, Rev. ed. London: Verso, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01609
[88]
Tom Boellstorff, ‘Dubbing Culture: Indonesian “Gay” and “Lesbi” Subjectivities and Ethnography in an Already Globalized World’, American Ethnologist, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 225–242, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/3805374?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[89]
N. Couldry, Media rituals: a critical approach. Abingdon: Routledge, 2003.
[90]
B. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, ‘The electronic vernacular’, in Connected: engagements with media, vol. Late editions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
[91]
P. Kockleman, ‘The Anthropology of an Equation: Sieves, spam filters, agentive algorithms, and ontologies of transformation’, HAU: journal of ethnographic theory [Online]. Available: http://www.haujournal.org/index.php/hau/article/view/hau3.3.003
[92]
J. S. Juris, ‘Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation’, American Ethnologist, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 259–279, May 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x.
[93]
J. Kallinikos, A. Aaltonen, and A. Marton, ‘A Theory of Digital Objects’. [Online]. Available: http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/
[94]
G. P. Landow and G. P. Landow, Hypertext 3.0: critical theory and new media in an era of globalization, [3rd ed.]., vol. Parallax. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.
[95]
B. Larkin, Signal and noise: media, infrastructure, and urban culture in Nigeria. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822389316
[96]
M. McLuhan, ‘The medium is the message’, in Understanding media: the extensions of man, London: Routledge, 1997.
[97]
‘Modernism’s Media and the End of Mediumship? On the Aesthetic Economy of Transparency in Thailand’, Public Culture, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 457–475, Jan. 2000 [Online]. Available: https://muse-jhu-edu.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/journals/public_culture/v012/12.2morris.html
[98]
N. Negroponte, Being digital, New ed. London: Coronet, 1996.
[99]
M. Warner, ‘Publics and Counterpublics’, Public Culture, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–90, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1215/08992363-14-1-49.
[100]
D. Miller and J. Sinanan, Webcam. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780745675770
[101]
Mirca Madianou and D. Miller, ‘Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 16, pp. 169–187 [Online]. Available: http://ics.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/search/results?fulltext=Polymedia%2C+Communication+and+Long+Distance+Relationships&x=9&y=8&submit=yes&journal_set=spics&src=selected&andorexactfulltext=and
[102]
K. M. Askew and R. R. Wilk, The anthropology of media: a reader, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Malden, Ma: Blackwell, 2002.
[103]
N. K. Baym, Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity, 2010.
[104]
Edited By Faye D. Ginsburg, Lila Abu-Lughod, And Brian Larkin., Media worlds. University Of California Press, 23AD [Online]. Available: https://www-dawsonera-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/abstract/9780520928169
[105]
M. Madianou and D. Miller, Migration and new media: transnational families and polymedia. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203154236
[106]
D. Miller, ‘The young and the restless in Trinidad: a case of the local and the global in mass consumption’, in Consuming technologies: media and information in domestic spaces, London: Routledge, 1992, pp. 163–182.
[107]
D. Miller and D. Slater, The internet: an ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg, 2000.
[108]
H. A. Horst and D. Miller, The cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Oxford: Berg, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847883193
[109]
J. Tacchi, ‘Radio Texture: Between Self and others’, in Material cultures: why some things matter, vol. Consumption and space, London: University College London Press, 1997, pp. 25–45.
[110]
A. Mackenzie, ‘More parts than elements: how databases multiply’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 335–350, 2012, doi: 10.1068/d6710.
[111]
N. Seaver, ‘Bastard Algebra’, in Data: Now Bigger and Better!, Bell, Boellstorff, Gregg, [Online]. Available: http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/D/bo20285526.html
[112]
E. Viveiros de Castro, ‘Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation - viewcontent.cgi’. [Online]. Available: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=tipiti
[113]
A. Riles, The network inside out: Annelise Riles. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001.
[114]
E. Viveiros de Castro, ‘The relative native’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.3.032.
[115]
‘The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions â�� Cultural Anthropology’. [Online]. Available: http://www.culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-%20politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
[116]
M. Candea and L. AlcaynaâStevens, ‘Internal Others: Ethnographies of Naturalism’, Cambridge Anthropology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 36–47, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.3167/ca.2012.300203.
[117]
B. Latour, ‘Chapter 2 - "Circulating Reference’, in Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1999.
[118]
D. J. Haraway, ‘Chapter 4 - "Gene”’, in ModestâWitness@SecondâMillennium.FemaleManâMeetsâOncoMouse: feminism and technoscience, New York: Routledge, 1997.
[119]
A. Evens and Aden Evens, ‘Web 2.0 and the Ontology of the Digital’, Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 006, no. 2, Jul. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/6/2/000120/000120.html
[120]
C. Coopmans, Ed., ‘Visual Analytics as Artful Revelation’, in Representation in scientific practice revisited, vol. Inside technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2014.
[121]
L. Amoore, ‘Data Derivatives: On the Emergence of a Security Risk Calculus for our Times.’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28 [Online]. Available: http://tcs.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/28/6.toc
[122]
Geoffrey C. Bowker, ‘Biodiversity Datadiversity’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 643–683, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/285760?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[123]
Elizabeth A. Povinelli, ‘The Woman on the Other Side of the Wall: Archiving the Otherwise in Postcolonial Digital Archives’, differences, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 146–171, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1215/10407391-1218274 10.1215/10407391-1218274. [Online]. Available: http://differences.dukejournals.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/22/1/146.short
[124]
L. Gitelman, ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron, vol. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=6451327
[125]
‘Julian Dibbell » A Rape in Cyberspace’. [Online]. Available: http://www.juliandibbell.com/articles/a-rape-in-cyberspace/
[126]
E. G. Coleman and A. Golub, ‘Hacker practice: Moral genres and the cultural articulation of liberalism’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 255–277, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1463499608093814.
[127]
T. Boellstorff, ‘Chapter 8: Ethics’, in Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of method, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400845286
[128]
‘A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace’. [Online]. Available: https://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html
[129]
D. M. Berry, ‘Internet research: privacy, ethics and alienation: an open source approach’, Internet Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 323–332, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1108/10662240410555333.
[130]
T. Boellstorff, ‘‘Chapter 9: Human Subjects Clearance and Institutional’, in Ethnography and virtual worlds: a handbook of method, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400845286
[131]
E. G. Coleman, Coding freedom: the ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.
[132]
Dag Elgesem et al, Internet Research Ethics. [Online]. Available: http://press.nordicopenaccess.no/index.php/noasp/catalog/book/3
[133]
N. D. Schüll, Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400834655
[134]
J. J. Gibson, The ecological approach to visual perception. New York: Psychology Press, 1986.
[135]
A. Golub and K. Lingley, ‘“Just Like the Qing Empire”: Internet Addiction, MMOGs, and Moral Crisis in Contemporary China’, Games and Culture, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 59–75, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1555412007309526.
[136]
W. Gunn and R. C. Smith, Design anthropology: theory and practice. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
[137]
T. Ingold, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge, 2011.
[138]
T. Ingold, Making: anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge, 2013.
[139]
E. Martin, Bipolar expeditions: mania and depression in American culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400829590
[140]
B. A. Nardi, My life as a night elf priest: an anthropological account of World of warcraft, vol. Technologies of the imagination. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780472026715/
[141]
J. G. Snodgrass, H. J. F. Dengah, M. G. Lacy, and J. Fagan, ‘A formal anthropological view of motivation models of problematic MMO play: Achievement, social, and immersion factors in the context of culture’, Transcultural Psychiatry, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 235–262, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1363461513487666.
[142]
J. Kjeldskov and M. B. Skov, ‘Was it worth the hassle?’, in Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services - MobileHCI ’14, 2014, pp. 43–52, doi: 10.1145/2628363.2628398 [Online]. Available: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2628363.2628398
[143]
Y. Rogers, N. Yuil, and P. Marshall, ‘Contrasting Lab Based and In the Wild Studies for Evaluating Multi-User Technologies’, in The SAGE Handbook of Digital Technology Research, S. Price, C. Jewitt, and B. Brown, Eds. London: Sage, 2013, pp. 359–373 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1534964
[144]
Y. Rogers, ‘Interaction design gone wild’, interactions, vol. 18, no. 4, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1145/1978822.1978834.
[145]
A. Blackwell, ‘Structuring the Social: Inside Software Design.’, in Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design, vol. Infrastructures series, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262322492
[146]
‘Selling Your Self in the United States | Ilana Gershon - Academia.edu’. [Online]. Available: https://www.academia.edu/9058981/Selling_Your_Self_in_the_United_States
[147]
J. Leach and L. Wilson, Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design, vol. Infrastructures series. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262322492
[148]
E. Hutchins, Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1995.
[149]
F. Ginsburg, ‘Disability in the Digital Age’, in Digital anthropology, London: Berg, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
[150]
M. Mauss, ‘“A category of the human mind: the notion of person; the notion of self.” (trs W.D. Halls)’, in The category of the person: anthropology, philosophy, history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
[151]
E. Goffman, The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin, 1990.
[152]
M. Strathern, Reproducing the future: essays on anthropology, kinship, and the new reproductive technologies. New York: Routledge, 1992.
[153]
‘Technological Leap-Frogging in the Congo Basin, Pygmies and Global Positioning Systems in Central Africa: What has happened and where is it going’’. [Online]. Available: http://jambo.africa.kyoto-u.ac.jp/kiroku/asm_suppl/abstracts/pdf/ASM_s43/2.LEWIS.pdf
[154]
‘Taking Participatory Citizen Science to Extremes’, IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 20–29, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2014.37.
[155]
‘Community Mapping by Non-literate Citizen Scientists in the Rainforest’. [Online]. Available: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1401465/1/Vitos.pdf
[156]
B. S. Hewlett, Ed., Hunter-gatherers of the Congo Basin: cultures, histories and biology of African Pygmies. New Brunswick, U.S.A.: Transaction Publishers, 2014.
[157]
‘Making local knowledge matter: Supporting non-literate people to monitor poaching in Congo - a1-vitos.pdf’. [Online]. Available: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1368259/1/a1-vitos.pdf
[158]
D. Dor, C. Knight, and J. Lewis, The social origins of language, vol. Oxford studies in the evolution of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
[159]
J. S. Juris, ‘The New Digital Media and Activist Networking within Anti-Corporate Globalization Movements’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 597, no. 1, pp. 189–208, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0002716204270338.
[160]
‘Reclaiming Virtual and Physical Spaces, Marion Hamm’ [Online]. Available: http://www.skor.nl/_files/Files/OPEN11_P96-111%281%29.pdf
[161]
G. Coleman, ‘Anonymous in Context: The Politics and Power behind the Mask’, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.cigionline.org/publications/anonymous-context-politics-and-power-behind-mask
[162]
M. Castells, Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge: Polity, 2012.
[163]
P. Gerbaudo, Tweets and the streets: social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781849648004
[164]
A. Sreberny and G. Khiabany, Blogistan: the internet and politics in Iran, vol. International library of Iranian studies. London: I.B. Tauris, 2010.
[165]
I. Shklovski and B. Valtysson, ‘Secretly Political: Civic Engagement in Online Publics in Kazakhstan’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 417–433, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1080/08838151.2012.705196.
[166]
‘Our Weirdness Is Free - Triple Canopy’, 2012. .
[167]
G. Coleman, ‘Hacker Politics and Publics’, Public Culture, vol. 23, no. 3 65, pp. 511–516, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1215/08992363-1336390.
[168]
Anonymous, ‘Digital Sit-ins: DDOS is legitimate civil disobedience - Anonymous: We are legion.’, 2012. .
[169]
E. Morozov, The net delusion: how not to liberate the world. London: Allen Lane, 2011.
[170]
D. Bollier, Viral spiral. New York: New Press, 2009.
[171]
‘The Cathedral and the Bazaar’. [Online]. Available: http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/
[172]
R. Stallman, ‘The GNU Manifesto - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)’, 1985. .
[173]
F. Myers, ‘Ontologies of the image and economies of exchange’, American Ethnologist, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 5–20, Feb. 2004, doi: 10.1525/ae.2004.31.1.5.
[174]
K. Christen, ‘Gone Digital: Aboriginal Remix and the Cultural Commons’, International Journal of Cultural Property, vol. 12, no. 03, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0940739105050186.
[175]
K. Christen, ‘Does Information Really Want to be Free? Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness | Christen | International Journal of Communication’, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1618
[176]
R. J. Coombe and A. Herman, ‘Rhetorical Virtues: Property, Speech, and the Commons on the World-Wide Web’, Anthropological Quarterly, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 559–574, 2004, doi: 10.1353/anq.2004.0037.
[177]
R. Coombe, ‘Your Second Life? Goodwill and the Performativity of Intellectual Property in Online Digital Gaming’. [Online]. Available: http://www.yorku.ca/rcoombe/publications/YourSecondLife.pdf
[178]
R. J. Coombe, ‘Culture Wars on the Net: Intellectual Property and Corporate Propriety in Digital Environments’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 919–947, Oct. 2001, doi: 10.1215/00382876-100-4-919.
[179]
C. M. Kelty, Two bits: the cultural significance of free software, vol. Experimental futures. Durham, [N.C.]: Duke University Press, 2008.
[180]
A. Chan, ‘Coding Free Software, Coding Free States: Free Software Legislation and the Politics of Code in Peru’, Anthropological Quarterly, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 531–545, 2004, doi: 10.1353/anq.2004.0046.
[181]
J. Leach, D. Nafus, and B. Krieger, ‘Freedom Imagined: Morality and Aesthetics in Open Source Software Design’, Ethnos, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 51–71, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1080/00141840902751188.
[182]
Coleman, Gabriella, ‘Code is speech: legal tinkering, expertise, and protest among free and open source software developers’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 420–454, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01036.x.
[183]
Ghosh, Rishab Aiyer, CODE: collaborative ownership and the digital economy, vol. Leonardo. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2005.
[184]
J. Boyle, ‘The second enclosure movement’, in The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind, London: Yale University Press, 2008.
[185]
K. Bowrey and J. Anderson, ‘The Politics of Global Information Sharing: Whose Cultural Agendas Are Being Advanced?’, Social & Legal Studies, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 479–504, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0964663909345095.
[186]
H. Geismar, ‘Museum+Digital = ?.’, in Digital anthropology, London: Berg, 2012.
[187]
Haidy Geismar, ‘Social relationships and digital relationships: rethinking the database at the Vanuatu Cultural Centre’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23011429
[188]
M. Christie and H. Verran, ‘Postcolonial Databasing? Subverting old appropriations, developing new associations’, in Subversion, conversion, development: cross-cultural knowledge exchange and the politics of design, vol. Infrastructures series, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262322492
[189]
R. Boyne, ‘Classification’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 23, no. 2–3, pp. 21–30, May 2006, doi: 10.1177/0263276406062529.
[190]
F. Cameron and S. Kenderdine, Theorizing digital cultural heritage: a critical discourse, vol. Media in transition. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262269742
[191]
‘Microsoft Word - Manovich_rev2.doc - manovich-lev_rev2.pdf’. [Online]. Available: http://www.gravitytrap.com/classes/readings/manovich-lev_rev2.pdf
[192]
A. Gell, Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[193]
Amiria Salmond, ‘Journal of Material Culture’, vol. 17, pp. 211–228 [Online]. Available: http://mcu.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/17/3.toc
[194]
D. Zeitlyn, ‘Anthropology in and of the Archives: Possible Futures and Contingent Pasts. Archives as Anthropological Surrogates*’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 461–480, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145721.
[195]
‘Codev2:Lawrence Lessig’. [Online]. Available: http://codev2.cc/
[196]
R. Srinivasan, R. Boast, J. Furner, and K. M. Becvar, ‘Digital Museums and Diverse Cultural Knowledges: Moving Past the Traditional Catalog’, The Information Society, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 265–278, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1080/01972240903028714.
[197]
‘Words, Ontologies and Aboriginal Databases’, 2005. .
[198]
R. Parry, ‘Transfer Protocols: Museum Codes and Ethics in the New Digital Environment’, in Routledge companion to museum ethics: redefining ethics for the twenty-first-century museum, London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 316–331 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203815465
[199]
R. Parry, Recoding the museum: digital heritage and the technologies of change, vol. Museum meanings. London: Routledge, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203347485
[200]
B. K. Gimblett, ‘Objects of Ethnography’, in Exhibiting cultures: the poetics and politics of museum display, Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991, pp. 386–443.
[201]
A. Glass and K. Keramidas, ‘On the Relational Exhibition in Analog and Digital Media’, in Objects of exchange: social and material transformation on the late nineteenth-century Northwest Coast : selections from the American Museum of Natural History, New York: Bard Graduate Center: Decorative Arts, Design History, Material Culture, 2011, pp. 215–226.
[202]
R. Srinivasan, K. M. Becvar, R. Boast, and J. Enote, ‘Diverse Knowledges and Contact Zones within the Digital Museum’, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 735–768, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1177/0162243909357755.
[203]
G. Isaac, ‘Technology Becomes the Object: The Use of Electronic Media at the National Museum of the American Indian’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 287–310, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1177/1359183508095497.
[204]
S. Thorner, ‘Collections: A Journal for Museums and Archives Professionals’, Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals | Rowman & Littlefield [Online]. Available: https://rowman.com/page/JMAP
[205]
E. Povinelli, ‘Routes/Worlds | e-flux’. [Online]. Available: http://www.e-flux.com/journal/routesworlds/
[206]
F. Larson, A. Petch, and D. Zeitlyn, ‘Social Networks and the Creation of the Pitt Rivers Museum’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 211–239, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1359183507081886.
[207]
R. B. Phillips, Museum pieces: toward the indigenization of Canadian museums, vol. McGill-Queen’s/Beaverbrook Canadian Foundation studies in art history. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2011.
[208]
V. Buchli, ‘The prototype: presencing the immaterial’, Visual Communication, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 273–286, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1470357210372718.
[209]
J.-F. Blanchette, ‘A material history of bits’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1042–1057, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1002/asi.21542.
[210]
M. Carpo, ‘The alphabet and the algorithm’, vol. Writing architecture, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2011, pp. 51–80.
[211]
M. D. Sahlins, ‘The Original Affluent Society’’, in Stone Age economics, London: Routledge, 2004.
[212]
G. Downey, ‘Virtual Webs, Physical Technologies, and Hidden Workers: The Spaces of Labor in Information Internetworks’, Technology and Culture, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 209–235, 2001, doi: 10.1353/tech.2001.0058.
[213]
T. M. Malaby, Making virtual worlds: Linden Lab and Second Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780801458996/
[214]
‘Flexible Capitalism : BERGHAHN BOOKS : Oxford, New York : Celebrating 21 Years of Independent Publishing!’ [Online]. Available: http://www.berghahnbooks.com/title.php?rowtag=KjaerulffFlexible
[215]
S. Wallman and Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth, Social anthropology of work, vol. A.S.A. monograph. London: Academic Press, 1979.
[216]
D. Holmes and G. Marcus, ‘Cultures of Expertise and the Management of Globalization: Toward the Re-functioning of Ethnography’, in Global assemblages : technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems / edited by Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier., 2005 [Online]. Available: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=dedupmrg114030551&indx=1&recIds=dedupmrg114030551&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL_LMS_DS%29&frbg=&tab=local&dstmp=1415833403083&srt=rank&mode=Basic&&dum=true&tb=t&vl(freeText0)=Global%20Assemblages&vid=UCL_VU1
[217]
B. K. Axel, ‘Anthropology and the New Technologies of Communication’, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 354–384, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1525/can.2006.21.3.354.
[218]
S. R. Barley and J. E. Orr, Eds., Between craft and science: technical work in U.S. settings, vol. Collection on technology and work. Ithaca: IRL Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press, 1997.
[219]
‘Digital Expertise in Online Journalism (and Anthropology)’, Anthropological Quarterly, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 73–95, 2010, doi: 10.1353/anq.0.0114.
[220]
J. S. Brown and P. Duguid, The social life of information, [New ed.]. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press, 2002.
[221]
M. Castells, ‘The Net and the Self: Working notes for a critical theory of the informational society’, Critique of Anthropology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 9–38, Mar. 1996, doi: 10.1177/0308275X9601600103.
[222]
K. Christen, ‘Access and Accountability: The Ecology of Information Sharing in the Digital Age’, Anthropology News, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 4–5, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1556-3502.2009.50404.x.
[223]
Horst, Heather A. and Miller, Daniel, ‘Design Anthropology: Working on, with and for, Digital Technologies’, in Digital anthropology, London: Berg, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857852922
[224]
C. Freeman, High tech and high heels in the global economy: women, work, and pink-collar identities in the Caribbean. Durham [N.C.]: Duke University Press, 2000.
[225]
D. Hakken, ‘Computing and Social Change: New Technology and Workplace Transformation, 1980-1990’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 107–132, Oct. 1993, doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.22.100193.000543.
[226]
D. Hakken, ‘Resocialing work? Anticipatory anthropology of the labor process’, Futures, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 767–775, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(00)00027-6.
[227]
K. Henderson, ‘Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering’, Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 448–473, Oct. 1991, doi: 10.1177/016224399101600402.
[228]
H. Knox, D. O’Doherty, T. Vurdubakis, and C. Westrup, ‘Transformative capacity, information technology, and the making of business “experts”’, The Sociological Review, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 22–41, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00679.x.
[229]
E. Martin, Flexible bodies: tracking immunity in American culture from the days of polio to the age of AIDS. Boston: Beacon Press, 1994.
[230]
J. E. Orr, Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job, vol. Collection on technology and work. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1996.
[231]
W. Orlikowski, ‘The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations’ [Online]. Available: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/2300/SWP-3141-22161783-CCS-TR-105.pdf?sequence=1
[232]
A. Ross, No-collar: the humane workplace and its hidden costs. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2004.
[233]
R. Sennett, The corrosion of character: the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton, 1998.
[234]
C. Shore and S. Wright, ‘Coercive Accountability: The Rise in Audit Culture in Higher Education’, in Audit cultures: anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy, vol. European Association of Social Anthropologists, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 57–89 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d97839a8-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[235]
A. Wittel, ‘Toward a Network Sociality’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 51–76, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1177/026327601018006003.
[236]
C. Zaloom, ‘Markets and Machines: Work in the Technological Sensoryscapes of Finance’, American Quarterly, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 815–837, 2006, doi: 10.1353/aq.2006.0072.
