1
Neocleous, M. Against security. Radical Philosophy. ;7–15.
2
Müller M. Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space. Geography Compass. 2015;9:27–41. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12192
3
Barry A. The Translation Zone: Between Actor-Network Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2013;41:413–29. doi: 10.1177/0305829813481007
4
Walters W. Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security. Security Dialogue. 2014;45:101–18. doi: 10.1177/0967010613519162
5
Barry A. Ethical Performances. Material Politics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2013:75–94.
6
Biemann U. Writing counter-geography | BUALA. http://www.buala.org/en/to-read/writing-counter-geography
7
Latour B. From realpolitik to dingpolitik. 2005.
8
Paglen T. Experimental Geography: From Cultural Production to the Production of Space | The Brooklyn Rail. 2009. https://brooklynrail.org/2009/03/express/experimental-geography-from-cultural-production-to-the-production-of-space
9
Project - Forensic Architecture. https://www.forensic-architecture.org/project/
10
Salter MB, editor. Making things international: 1: Circuits and motion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2015.
11
Preziosi D, Farago CJ. Grasping the world: the idea of the museum. Aldershot: Ashgate 2004.
12
Bahrani Z. Regarding Art and Art History. The Art Bulletin. 2013;95:516–7. doi: 10.1080/00043079.2013.10786090
13
Rappert B. How to Look Good in a War. Pluto Press 2015.
14
Burgess, Adam. The changing character of public inquiries in the (risk) regulatory state. British Politics. ;6:3–29.
15
Philpp J. The limits of the visible: the politics of contingency in the photographic work of Trevor Paglen. Critical studies. Published Online First: 2016.
16
Horn, E. Knowing the enemy: The epistemology of secret intelligence. Grey Room. ;59–85.
17
Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament - 2016-2017_ISC_AR.pdf. https://b1cba9b3-a-5e6631fd-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/independent.gov.uk/isc/files/2016-2017_ISC_AR.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7crF1OVvrQdZfgNk9G1HiYyefkgUScTj05iEsCEbXtQncCyid-Du8fqCDYb3HIn0BZcZ1ZcdI4JgVLCqkOhnVyNHWUGi6LjpzVmxUfBxOKzdB8p9N_-pYH9CqAp4Dcaxebx_zmtmU0dhF5Me4LXJKoDoR-1Ge_0dFHzIyeJAeuOgcYoFAJiBVWtQnLcabQ29lHj9zEy7BKv-n9IiHV7LCjRk7Kcq6tZQNAQ3-WSOmkYLmvF_LVo%3D&attredirects=0
18
David Grondin and Nisha Shah. Secrets.
19
Burch S. A VIRTUAL OASIS: TRAFALGAR SQUARE’S ARCH OF PALMYRA. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR. 2017;11. doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1401
20
The Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial official brochure - GOV.UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-iraq-and-afghanistan-memorial-official-brochure
21
Sumartojo S. The Fourth Plinth: creating and contesting national identity in Trafalgar Square, 2005–2010. cultural geographies. 2013;20:67–81. doi: 10.1177/1474474012448304
22
de Goede M. Preemption contested: Suspect spaces and preventability in the July 7 inquest. Political Geography. 2014;39:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.08.001
23
Report under Rule 43 of The Coroner’s Rules 1984 - rule43-report.pdf.
24
Merrill S. Walking together? The mediatised performative commemoration of 7/7’s tenth anniversary. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism. Published Online First: 30 October 2017. doi: 10.1177/1464884917738414
25
Neocleous, M. Against security. Radical Philosophy. ;7–15.
26
Thomas OD. Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry. Politics. 2017;37:371–85. doi: 10.1177/0263395716688488
27
Thomas, Owen David. The Iraq Inquiries. Published Online First: 2015.
28
Porter P. Blunder: Britain’s war in Iraq. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018.
29
Report of the Litvinenko Inquiry. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160613090324/https://www.litvinenkoinquiry.org/report
30
Miller T. Museums, Ecology, Citizenship. In: Macdonald S, Rees Leahy H, eds. The International Handbooks of Museum Studies. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2013:139–56.
31
Ingram A. Art, Geopolitics and Metapolitics at Tate Galleries London. Geopolitics. 2017;22:719–39. doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1263186
32
Is the Museum a Battlefield? on Vimeo.
33
Ingram A. Bringing war home: From Baghdad, 5 March 2007 to London, 9 September 2010. Political Geography. 2012;31:61–3. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.05.002
34
Sahakian R. It is what it is. 2012. http://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/25300/It-Is-What-It-Is
35
It Is What It Is: Conversations About Iraq - Creative Time. http://creativetime.org/projects/it-is-what-it-is-conversations-about-iraq/
36
Alan Ingram. Rethinking art and geopolitics through aesthetics: artist responses to the Iraq war. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 2016;41:1–13. doi: 10.1111/tran.12099
37
Halvorsen S. Taking Space: Moments of Rupture and Everyday Life in Occupy London. Antipode. 2015;47:401–17. doi: 10.1111/anti.12116
38
Halvorsen S. Encountering Occupy London: Boundary Making and the Territoriality of Urban Activism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2015;33:314–30. doi: 10.1068/d14041p
39
Anna Feigenbaum, Fabian Frenzel and Patrick McCurdy. Protest Camps.
