[1]
Neocleous, M, ‘Against security’, Radical Philosophy, pp. 7–15 [Online]. Available: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest1036571300&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,neocleous%20security&sortby=rank&facet=rtype,include,articles&offset=0
[2]
M. Müller, ‘Assemblages and Actor-networks: Rethinking Socio-material Power, Politics and Space’, Geography Compass, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 27–41, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1111/gec3.12192.
[3]
A. Barry, ‘The Translation Zone: Between Actor-Network Theory and International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 413–429, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0305829813481007.
[4]
W. Walters, ‘Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security’, Security Dialogue, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 101–118, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1177/0967010613519162.
[5]
A. Barry, ‘Ethical Performances’, in Material Politics, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2013, pp. 75–94 [Online]. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118529065.ch4
[6]
U. Biemann, ‘Writing counter-geography | BUALA’. [Online]. Available: http://www.buala.org/en/to-read/writing-counter-geography
[7]
B. Latour, ‘From realpolitik to dingpolitik’. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/96-DINGPOLITIK-GB.pdf
[8]
T. Paglen, ‘Experimental Geography: From Cultural Production to the Production of Space | The Brooklyn Rail’, 2009. [Online]. Available: https://brooklynrail.org/2009/03/express/experimental-geography-from-cultural-production-to-the-production-of-space
[9]
‘Project - Forensic Architecture’. [Online]. Available: https://www.forensic-architecture.org/project/
[10]
M. B. Salter, Ed., Making things international: 1: Circuits and motion. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt14jxw02
[11]
D. Preziosi and C. J. Farago, Grasping the world: the idea of the museum. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.
[12]
Z. Bahrani, ‘Regarding Art and Art History’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 516–517, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1080/00043079.2013.10786090.
[13]
B. Rappert, How to Look Good in a War. Pluto Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt183pbws
[14]
Burgess, Adam, ‘The changing character of public inquiries in the (risk) regulatory state’, British Politics, vol. 6, pp. 3–29 [Online]. Available: https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/858096419?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
[15]
J. Philpp, ‘The limits of the visible: the politics of contingency in the photographic work of Trevor Paglen’, Critical studies, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.criticalstudies.org.uk/uploads/2/6/0/7/26079602/jeandree_csv2.pdf
[16]
Horn, E., ‘Knowing the enemy: The epistemology of secret intelligence’, Grey Room, pp. 59–85 [Online]. Available: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_scopus2-s2.0-61249225123&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,horn%20knowing%20the%20enemy&sortby=rank&offset=0
[17]
‘Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament - 2016-2017_ISC_AR.pdf’. [Online]. Available: https://b1cba9b3-a-5e6631fd-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/independent.gov.uk/isc/files/2016-2017_ISC_AR.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7crF1OVvrQdZfgNk9G1HiYyefkgUScTj05iEsCEbXtQncCyid-Du8fqCDYb3HIn0BZcZ1ZcdI4JgVLCqkOhnVyNHWUGi6LjpzVmxUfBxOKzdB8p9N_-pYH9CqAp4Dcaxebx_zmtmU0dhF5Me4LXJKoDoR-1Ge_0dFHzIyeJAeuOgcYoFAJiBVWtQnLcabQ29lHj9zEy7BKv-n9IiHV7LCjRk7Kcq6tZQNAQ3-WSOmkYLmvF_LVo%3D&attredirects=0
[18]
David Grondin and Nisha Shah, ‘Secrets’ [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b9s0d9.10?refreqid=excelsior%3Ae3b2612a0b9b79c45007ad22411eed3f&seq=11#metadata_info_tab_contents
[19]
S. Burch, ‘A VIRTUAL OASIS: TRAFALGAR SQUARE’S ARCH OF PALMYRA’, International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, vol. 11, no. 3, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i3.1401.
[20]
‘The Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial official brochure - GOV.UK’. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-iraq-and-afghanistan-memorial-official-brochure
[21]
S. Sumartojo, ‘The Fourth Plinth: creating and contesting national identity in Trafalgar Square, 2005–2010’, cultural geographies, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 67–81, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1474474012448304.
[22]
M. de Goede, ‘Preemption contested: Suspect spaces and preventability in the July 7 inquest’, Political Geography, vol. 39, pp. 48–57, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.08.001.
[23]
‘Report under Rule 43 of The Coroner’s Rules 1984 - rule43-report.pdf’. [Online]. Available: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120216072447/http://7julyinquests.independent.gov.uk/docs/orders/rule43-report.pdf
[24]
S. Merrill, ‘Walking together? The mediatised performative commemoration of 7/7’s tenth anniversary’, Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1464884917738414.
[25]
Neocleous, M, ‘Against security’, Radical Philosophy, pp. 7–15 [Online]. Available: https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_proquest1036571300&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,neocleous%20security&sortby=rank&facet=rtype,include,articles&offset=0
[26]
O. D. Thomas, ‘Good faith and (dis)honest mistakes? Learning from Britain’s Iraq War Inquiry’, Politics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 371–385, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0263395716688488.
[27]
Thomas, Owen David, ‘The Iraq Inquiries’, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/handle/10871/28720
[28]
P. Porter, Blunder: Britain’s war in Iraq, First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198807964.001.0001
[29]
‘Report of the Litvinenko Inquiry’. [Online]. Available: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20160613090324/https://www.litvinenkoinquiry.org/report
[30]
T. Miller, ‘Museums, Ecology, Citizenship’, in The International Handbooks of Museum Studies, S. Macdonald and H. Rees Leahy, Eds. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2013, pp. 139–156 [Online]. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781118829059.wbihms108
[31]
A. Ingram, ‘Art, Geopolitics and Metapolitics at Tate Galleries London’, Geopolitics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 719–739, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2016.1263186.
[32]
‘Is the Museum a Battlefield? on Vimeo’. [Online]. Available: https://vimeo.com/76011774
[33]
A. Ingram, ‘Bringing war home: From Baghdad, 5 March 2007 to London, 9 September 2010’, Political Geography, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 61–63, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.05.002.
[34]
R. Sahakian, ‘It is what it is’, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/25300/It-Is-What-It-Is
[35]
‘It Is What It Is: Conversations About Iraq - Creative Time’. [Online]. Available: http://creativetime.org/projects/it-is-what-it-is-conversations-about-iraq/
[36]
Alan Ingram, ‘Rethinking art and geopolitics through aesthetics: artist responses to the Iraq war’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1111/tran.12099. [Online]. Available: https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14755661/2016/41/1
[37]
S. Halvorsen, ‘Taking Space: Moments of Rupture and Everyday Life in Occupy London’, Antipode, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 401–417, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1111/anti.12116.
[38]
S. Halvorsen, ‘Encountering Occupy London: Boundary Making and the Territoriality of Urban Activism’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 314–330, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.1068/d14041p.
[39]
Anna Feigenbaum, Fabian Frenzel and Patrick McCurdy, ‘Protest Camps’ [Online]. Available: https://www-jstor-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/10.5749/j.ctt1b9s0d9.7?refreqid=excelsior%3A3b5298ae833ce653b15b0c3dc1fc789c&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
