1
Arnold, Dean E. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
2
Barley, Nigel. Smashing pots: works of clay from Africa. London: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1994.
3
Berg, Ina, International Conference on Prehistoric Ceramics, Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Breaking the mould: challenging the past through pottery. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2008.
4
Lange, Frederick W., Bishop, Ronald L. The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991.
5
Gaimster, David R. M., Freestone, Ian. Pottery in the making: world ceramic traditions. London: : British Museum Press 1997.
6
Gibson, Alex M., Woods, A. J. Prehistoric pottery for the archaeologist. Leicester: : Leicester University Press 1990.
7
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
8
Peacock, D. P. S. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London: : Longman 1982.
9
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.
10
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 1. Function, Style, and Origins. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:133–63.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053114
11
Prudence M. Rice. Recent Ceramic Analysis: 2. Composition, Production, and Theory. Journal of Archaeological Research 1996;4:165–202.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053131
12
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: : Taraxacum 1981.
13
Shimada, Izumi. Craft production in complex societies: multicraft and producer perspectives. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2007.
14
Scarcella, Simona. Archaeological ceramics: a review of current research. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2011.
15
Sinopoli, Carla M. Approaches to archaeological ceramics. New York: : Plenum Press 1991.
16
Feinman, Gary M., Skibo, James M. Pottery and people: a dynamic interaction. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1999.
17
Miriam T. Stark. Current Issues in Ceramic Ethnoarchaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 2003;11:193–242.http://www.jstor.org/stable/41053198
18
M. S. Tite. Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1999;6:181–233.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177403
19
Tyers, Paul. Roman pottery in Britain. London: : Batsford 1996.
20
Pritchard, Alison C., Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der. The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: : Universiteit van Amsterdam 1984.
21
Di Pierro, S., Serneels, Vincent, Maggetti, Marino, et al. Ceramic in the society: proceedings of the 6th European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics, Fribourg, Swtizerland 3-6 October 2001. Fribourg: : Department of Geosciences, Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Fribourg 2003.
22
Prudêncio, M. Isabel, Dias, M. Isabel, Waerenborgh, J. C., et al. Understanding people through their pottery: proceedings of the 7th European Meeting on Ancient Ceramics (EMAC’03) : October 27-31, 2003 : Instituto Tecnológico e Nuclear, Lisbon, Portugal. Lisboa: : Instituto Português de Arqueologia 2005.
23
Welcome to the PCRG. http://www.pcrg.org.uk/
24
Medieval Pottery Research Group. http://www.medievalpottery.org.uk/
25
Roman Pottery in Britain. http://potsherd.net/atlas/publications
26
ArchNet: Ceramic Attribute Glossary. http://archnet.asu.edu/archives/ceramic/hgloss/hgloss.html
27
The Alan Vince Archaeological Consultancy. http://www.postex.demon.co.uk/
28
Van der Leeuw SE, Pritchard AC. Dust to dust: a transformational view of the ceramic cycle. In: The many dimensions of pottery: ceramics in archaeology and anthropology. Amsterdam: : Universiteit van Amsterdam 1984. 707–73.
29
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: : Taraxacum 1981.
30
Abbink, Albertine Alie. Make it and break it: the cycles of pottery : a study of the technology, form, function, and use of pottery from the settlements at Uitgeest-Groot Dorregeest and Schagen-Muggenburg 1, Roman period, North Holland, the Netherlands. Leiden: : Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University 1999.
31
Nordström, Hans-Åke, Arnold, Dorothea, Bourriau, Janine, et al. An Introduction to ancient Eqyptian pottery. Mainz am Rhein: : P. von Zabern 1993.
32
Atkin, Jacqui. Handbuilt pottery techniques revealed: the secrets of handbuilding shown in unique cutaway photography. Hauppauge, N.Y.: : Barron’s Educational Series 2004.
33
Barrett JC. Bronze Age Pottery and Problems of Classification. In: Papers on the prehistoric archaeology of Cranborne Chase. Oxford: : Oxbow 1991. 201–31.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d5c87a22-b105-e811-80cd-005056af4099
34
Gibson, Alex M. Prehistoric pottery in Britain & Ireland. Stroud: : Tempus 2002.
35
Gibson AM, Woods AJ. Prehistoric pottery for the archaeologist. Leicester: : Leicester University Press 1990.
36
Hamer, Frank, Hamer, Janet. The potter’s dictionary of materials and techniques. 3rd ed. London: : A & C Black 1991.
37
Kempton, Willett. The folk classification of ceramics: a study of cognitive prototypes. New York: : Academic Press 1981.
38
Miller, Daniel. Artefacts as categories: a study of ceramic variability in central India. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
39
Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. The study of later prehistoric pottery: general policies and guidelines for analysis and publication. Oxford: : Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group 1995. http://www.pcrg.org.uk/News_pages/PCRG%20Gudielines%203rd%20Edition%20%282010%29.pdf
40
Read, Dwight W. Artifact classification: a conceptual and methodological approach. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2007.
41
Van der Leeuw SE, Longacre WA. Variation, Variability and Explanation in Pottery Studies. In: Ceramic ethnoarchaeology. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 1991. 11–39.
42
Hill, J. D., Woodward, Ann, Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: : Oxbow 2002.
43
ArchNet: Ceramic Attribute Glossary. http://archnet.asu.edu/archives/ceramic/hgloss/hgloss.html
44
Welcome to the PCRG. http://www.pcrg.org.uk/
45
Livingston-Smith A, Gosselain OP. The Source: Clay Selection and processing practices in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Pottery manufacturing processes: reconstitution and interpretation. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2005. 33–47.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4745472b-9636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
46
Pollard AM, Heron C. The geochemistry of clays and provenance of ceramics. In: Archaeological chemistry. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2008. 104–48.http://www.ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1185179
47
Barley, Nigel. Smashing pots: works of clay from Africa. London: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1994.
48
Colbeck, John. Pottery materials: their composition, preparation and use. London: : Batsford 1988.
49
Gosselain OP. In Pots we Trust: The Processing of Clay and Symbols In Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Material Culture 1999;4:205–30. doi:10.1177/135918359900400205
50
Grimshaw, Rex W., Searle, Alfred B. The chemistry and physics of clays and allied ceramic materials. 4th ed. rev. New York: : Wiley-Interscience
51
Hamer, Frank, Hamer, Janet. The potter’s dictionary of materials and techniques. 3rd ed. London: : A & C Black 1991.
52
Pollard, A. M., Heron, Carl, Royal Society of Chemistry (Great Britain). Archaeological chemistry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: : Royal Society of Chemistry 2008.
53
Rice PM. Properties of Clays I: the Clay/Water System. In: Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987. 54–79.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a23370dd-0505-e811-80cd-005056af4099
54
Sillar B. The Dead and the Drying: Techniques for Transforming People and Things in the Andes. Journal of Material Culture 1996;1:259–89. doi:10.1177/135918359600100301
55
Smith AL. Processing clay for pottery in Northern Cameroon: social and technical requirements. Archaeometry 2000;42:21–42. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00864.x
56
Tobert N. Ethno-archaeology of pottery firing in Darfur, Sudan: implications for ceramic technology studies. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 1984;3:141–56. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.1984.tb00323.x
57
Velde, B. Introduction to clay minerals: chemistry, orgins, uses and environmental significance. London: : Chapman & Hall 1992.
58
Woodward A. Inclusions, Impressions and Interpretations. In: Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: : Oxbow 2002. 106–18.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9ca597f2-8136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
59
Worrall, W. E. Clays and ceramic raw materials. 2nd ed. London: : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers 1986.
60
Van der Leeuw S. Giving the potter a choice: conceptual aspects of pottery techniques. In: Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: : Routledge 1993. 238–88.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=5fcca5c0-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
61
Rye, Owen S. Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: : Taraxacum 1981.
62
Nordström, Hans-Åke, Arnold, Dorothea, Bourriau, Janine, et al. An Introduction to ancient Eqyptian pottery. Mainz am Rhein: : P. von Zabern 1993.
63
Brandt, R. W., Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der, Groenman-Van Waateringe, Willy. Assendelver Polder papers. Amsterdam: : Universiteit van Amsterdam, Albert Egges van Giffen Instituut voor Prae- en Protohistorie 1987.
64
Courty MA, Roux V. Identification of wheel throwing on the basis of ceramic surface features and microfabrics. Journal of Archaeological Science 1995;22:17–50. doi:10.1016/S0305-4403(95)80161-8
65
Nicholas David, Judy Sterner and Kodzo Gavua. Why Pots are Decorated. Current Anthropology 1988;29:365–89.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2743453
66
Livingstone-Smith, Alexandre, Bosquet, Dominique, International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences. Pottery manufacturing processes: reconstitution and interpretation. Oxford: : Archaeopress 2005.
67
Helen L. Loney. Society and Technological Control: A Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies. American Antiquity 2000;65:646–68.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2694420
68
Mahias MC. Pottery Techniques in India: Technical variants and social choice. In: Technological choices: transformation in material cultures since the Neolithic. London: : Routledge 1993.
69
Shaw, Ian, Nicholson, Paul T. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
70
Rice PM. Pottery Manufacturing Technology: an Ethnographic Overview. In: Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987. 113–67.
71
Sillar B, Tite MS. The challenge of ‘technological choices’ for materials science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry 2000;42:2–20. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00863.x
72
Leeuw, Sander Ernst van der. Studies in the technology of ancient pottery. Amsterdam]: : [University of Amsterdam]
73
Vandiver PB. The implications of variation in ceramic technology: the forming of Neolithic storage vessels in China and the Near East. Archeomaterials 1986;2:139–74.
74
Gosselain OP. Bonfire of the enquiries. Pottery firing temperatures in archaeology: What for? Journal of Archaeological Science 1992;19:243–59. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(92)90014-T
75
Livingstone Smith A. Bonfire II: The Return of Pottery Firing Temperatures. Journal of Archaeological Science 2001;28:991–1003. doi:10.1006/jasc.2001.0713
76
Adan-Bayewitz D, Wieder M. Ceramics from Roman Galilee: A Comparison of Several Techniques for Fabric Characterization. Journal of Field Archaeology 1992;19:189–205. doi:10.1179/009346992791548941
77
Heimann RB. Firing Technologies and Their Possible Assessment by Modern Analytic Methods. In: Archaeological ceramics. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1982. 89–98.
78
Magetti M. Phase analysis and its significance for technology and origin. In: Archaeological ceramics. Washington, D.C.: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1982. 121–34.
79
Johnson JS, Clark J, Miller-Antonio S, et al. Effects of firing temperature on the fate of naturally occurring organic matter in clays. Journal of Archaeological Science 1988;15:403–14. doi:10.1016/0305-4403(88)90038-6
80
Paynter S, Tite M. The evolution of Glazing Technologies in the Ancient Near East and Egypt. In: The social context of technological change: Egypt and the Near East, 1650-1550 B.C. : proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, 12-14 September 2000. Oxford: : Oxbow 2001. 239–54.https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw299c.17?refreqid=excelsior:61792d10245991fb8515172c2da5d173&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
81
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.
82
Rice, Prudence M., American Ceramic Society. The prehistory & history of ceramic kilns. Westerville, Ohio: : The American Ceramic Society 1997.
83
Robinson AM. Three approaches to the problem of pottery fabric description. Medieval ceramics 1979;3:3–35.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7f652d4e-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
84
Owen RS. Firing. In: Pottery technology: principles and reconstruction. Washington, D.C.: : Taraxacum 1981. 96–122.
85
SILLAR B. Dung by preference: the choice of fuel as an example of how Andean pottery production is embedded within wider technical, social and economic practices. Archaeometry 2000;42:43–60. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.2000.tb00865.x
86
Swan, Vivien G. The pottery kilns of Roman Britain. London: : H.M.S.O. 1984.
87
Tite MS. Firing temperature determinations - how and why? In: The aim of laboratory analyses of ceramics in archaeology, April 7-9, 1995 in Lund, Sweden. Stockholm: : Kungl. Vitterhets historie och antikvitets akademien 1995. 37–42.
88
Tomber, R., Dore, John, English Heritage, et al. The National Roman Fabric Reference Collection: a handbook. London: : Museum of London Archaeology Service 1998.
89
Cathy L. Costin and Melissa B. Hagstrum. Standardization, Labor Investment, Skill, and the Organization of Ceramic Production in Late Prehispanic Highland Peru. American Antiquity 1995;60:619–39.http://www.jstor.org/stable/282046
90
Patricia L. Crown. Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology. American Antiquity 2007;72:677–90.http://www.jstor.org/stable/25470440
91
Karen G. Harry. Ceramic Specialization and Agricultural Marginality: Do Ethnographic Models Explain the Development of Specialized Pottery Production in the Prehistoric American Southwest? American Antiquity 2005;70:295–319.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035705
92
Arnold, Dean E. Ceramic theory and cultural process. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1985.
93
Arnold, Dean E. Social change and the evolution of ceramic production and distribution in a Maya community. Boulder: : University Press of Colorado 2008.
94
Hoopes, John W., Barnett, William. The emergence of pottery: technology and innovation in ancient societies. Washington [D.C.]: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1995.
95
Clark JE. Craft specialization as an archaeological category. Research in economic anthropology 1995;16:267–94.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c84dfee2-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
96
Cathy Lynne Costin. Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production. Archaeological Method and Theory 1991;3:1–56.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170212
97
Day PM, Wilson EE. Reassessing specialization in pre- palatial Cretan ceramic production. Aegaeum: annales d’archéologie égéenne de l’Université de Liège, 6 1990;16:275–90.
98
Franken, H. J., Kalsbeek, J. Potters of a medieval village in the Jordan Valley: excavations at Tell deir ʻAllā--a medieval tell, Tell Abu Gourdan, Jordan. Amsterdam: : North-Holland Pub. Co 1975.
99
Hirth K. Housework and Domestic Craft Production: An Introduction. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association 2009;19:1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1551-8248.2009.01009.x
100
Hagstrum MB. Measuring Prehistoric Ceramic Craft Specialization: a Test Case in the American Southwest. Journal of Field Archaeology 1985;12:65–75. doi:10.1179/009346985791169562
101
Jordan, Peter, Zvelebil, Marek. Ceramics before farming: the dispersal of pottery among prehistoric Eurasian hunter-gatherers. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast Press 2009.
102
London GA. Response to Melissa Hagstrum, ‘Measuring Prehistoric Cereamic Craft specialization: a Test Case in the American Southwest’. News and Short Contributions 1986;4:510–1.http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/maney/00934690/v13n4/s8.pdf?expires=1362667909&id=73208045&titleid=75005571&accname=UCL%20LIBRARY&checksum=B7F0091C972565DF37CCB4A04EAF21BE
103
McGovern, Patrick E., Notis, M. D., American Ceramic Society. Cross-craft and cross-cultural interactions in ceramics. Westerville, OH: : American Ceramic Society 1989.
104
Peacock, D. P. S. Pottery in the Roman world: an ethnoarchaeological approach. London: : Longman 1982.
105
David A. Phillips Jr. Comment on Harry’s Discussion of Ceramic Specialization and Agricultural Marginality in the Prehistoric U.S. Southwest. American Antiquity 2006;71:397–8.http://www.jstor.org/stable/40035911
106
Rautman M. Handmade Pottery and Social Change: the view from Late Roman Cyprus. Journal of Mediterranean archaeology;11:81–104. doi:10.1558/jmea.v11i1.81
107
Rice PM. Specialization, Standardization and Diversity: a retrospective. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991. 257–79.
108
Shimada, Izumi. Craft production in complex societies: multicraft and producer perspectives. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 2007.
109
Sillar B. Reputable pots and disreputable potters: individual and community choice in present-day pottery production and exchange in the Andes. In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 1–20.
110
Anne P. Underhill. Investigating Variation in Organization of Ceramic Production: An Ethnoarchaeological Study in Guizhou, China. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2003;10:203–75.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177480
111
Orton C. Production and Distribution. In: Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1de25815-acff-e811-80cd-005056af4099
112
Carl Knappett, Vassilis Kilikoglou, Val Steele and Ben Stern. The Circulation and Consumption of Red Lustrous Wheelmade Ware: Petrographic, Chemical and Residue Analysis. Anatolian Studies 2005;55:25–59.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20065534
113
Dean E. Arnold, Hector Neff and Ronald L. Bishop. Compositional Analysis and ‘Sources’ of Pottery: An Ethnoarcheological Approach. American Anthropologist 1991;93:70–90.http://www.jstor.org/stable/681474
114
Samuel V. Connell. Getting Closer to the Source: Using Ethnoarchaeology to Find Ancient Pottery Making in the Naco Valley, Honduras. Latin American Antiquity 2002;13:401–17.http://www.jstor.org/stable/972223
115
Ian Hodder. Regression Analysis of Some Trade and Marketing Patterns. World Archaeology 1974;6:172–89.http://www.jstor.org/stable/124001
116
Howard, Hilary, Morris, Elaine L., Technology and Trade colloquium. Production and distribution: a ceramic viewpoint. Oxford: : B.A.R. 1981.
117
Lyne, M. A. B., Jefferies, R. S., Council for British Archaeology. The Alice Holt/Farnham Roman pottery industry. London: : The Council of British Archaeology 1979. http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr30.cfm?CFID=1673083&CFTOKEN=72201017&
118
Morris EL, Woodward A. Ceramic Petrology and Prehistoric Pottery in the UK. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society;69:279–303. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00001353
119
Parker-Pearson M. The production and distribution of Bronze Age pottery in South-Western Britain. Cornish Archaeology 1990;29:5–32.http://cornisharchaeology.org.uk/journals/No.29_1990.pdf
120
Peacock, D. P. S., Williams, D. F. Amphorae and the Roman economy: an introductory guide. London: : Longman 1986.
121
Rice, Prudence M. Pottery analysis: a sourcebook. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1987.
122
M. S. Tite. Pottery Production, Distribution, and Consumption: The Contribution of the Physical Sciences. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1999;6:181–233.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177403
123
Bey, George J., Pool, Christopher A. Pottery economics in Mesoamerica. Tucson: : University of Arizona Press 2007.
124
Tomber, R., Dore, John, English Heritage, et al. The National Roman Fabric Reference Collection: a handbook. London: : Museum of London Archaeology Service 1998.
125
Tyers, Paul. Roman pottery in Britain. London: : Batsford 1996.
126
Wilson L, Pollard AM. The Provenance hypothesis. In: Handbook of archaeological sciences. Chichester: : John Wiley 2001. 508–17.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c39eb5b5-5736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
127
Aimers JJ. The curse of the Ware: using ceramic systems in Belize. In: Archaeological investigations in the eastern Maya lowlands: papers of the 2003 Belize Archaeology Symposium. Belmopan, Belize: : Institute of Archaeology, National Institute of Culture and History 2004.
128
Allison PM. Why do excavation reports have finds’ catalogues? In: Not so much a pot, more a way of life: current approaches to artefact analysis in archaeology. Oxford: : Oxbow 1997. 77–84.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=13a963f1-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
129
Brooks A. A hierarchy of servitude: ceramics at Lake Innes Estate, New South Wales. Antiquity 2007;81:133–47.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217542954?accountid=14511
130
Orton, Clive, Tyers, Paul, Vince, A. G. Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1993.
131
Barrett JC. Bronze Age Pottery and Problems of Classification. In: Papers on the prehistoric archaeology of Cranborne Chase. Oxford: : Oxbow 1991. 201–31.
132
English Heritage. Management of research projects in the Historic Environment. 2006.http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/content/publications/publicationsNew/guidelines-standards/morphe-project-managers-guide/morphe-project-managers-guide-1.1-2009.pdf
133
Gibson, Alex M., Woods, A. J. Prehistoric pottery for the archaeologist. 2nd ed. London: : Leicester University Press 1997.
134
Willis, Steven, Hingley, Richard. Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxford: : Oxbow Books 2007.
135
Institute of Field Archaeologists. Standard and guidance for the collection, documentation, conservation and research of archaeological materials. 2000.http://www.archaeologists.net/sites/default/files/node-files/ifa_standards_materials.pdf
136
Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. The study of later prehistoric pottery: general policies. Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group 1991. http://www.pcrg.org.uk/News_pages/PCRG%20Gudielines%203rd%20Edition%20%282010%29.pdf
137
Symonds, R. P., Wade, Sue, Roper, Andrew, et al. Roman pottery from excavations in Colchester, 1971-86. Colchester: : Colchester Archaeological Trust 1999. http://cat.essex.ac.uk/reports/CAR-report-0010.pdf
138
Wheat JB. Ceramic Classification: Bradfield and Shepard, Types and Varieties. In: The ceramic legacy of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, Colo: : University Press of Colorado 1991. 121–31.
139
Whitbread IK. A proposal for the systematic description of thin sections towards the study of ancient ceramic technology. In: Archaeometry: proceedings of the 25th international symposium. Amsterdam: : Elsevier 1989. 127–38.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c1902c95-1205-e811-80cd-005056af4099
140
Berg, Ina. The meanings of standardisation: conical cups in the late Bronze Age Aegean. Antiquity 2004;78:74–85.http://search.proquest.com/docview/217584226?accountid=14511
141
Goulder J. Administrators’ bread: an experiment-based re-assessment of the functional and cultural role of the Uruk bevel-rim bowl. Antiquity 2010;84:351–62.http://search.proquest.com/docview/504814319?accountid=14511
142
David Wengrow. The Evolution of Simplicity: Aesthetic Labour and Social Change in the Neolithic Near East. World Archaeology 2001;33:168–88.http://www.jstor.org/stable/827897
143
Brown D. Pottery and manners. In: Consuming passions: dining from antiquity to the eighteenth century. Stroud: : Tempus 2005. 87–100.
144
Charters S, Evershed RP, Goad LJ, et al. Quantification and distribution of Lipid in archaeological cermaics: implications for sampling potsherds for organic residue analysis and the classification of vessel use. Archaeometry 1993;35:211–23. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4754.1993.tb01036.x
145
Tite MS, Kilikoglou V, Vekinis G. Strength, Toughness and Thermal Shock Resistance of Ancient Ceramics, and Their Influence On Technological Choice. Archaeometry 2001;43:301–24. doi:10.1111/1475-4754.00019
146
Allison, Penelope Mary. Pompeian households: an analysis of the material culture. Los Angeles: : Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at University of California, Los Angeles 2004.
147
John W. Arthur. Pottery Use-Alteration as an Indicator of Socioeconomic Status: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of the Gamo of Ethiopia. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 2002;9:331–55.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20177467?seq=1
148
Biddulph E. Last orders: choosing pottery for funerals in Roman Essex. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2005;24:23–45. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2005.00223.x
149
Bollong C A. Analysis of Site Stratigraphy and Formation Processes Using Patterns of Pottery Sherd Dispersion. Journal of Field Archaeology 1994;21. doi:10.1179/009346994791549254
150
Cathy Lynne Costin and Timothy Earle. Status Distinction and Legitimation of Power as Reflected in Changing Patterns of Consumption in Late Prehispanic Peru. American Antiquity 1989;54:691–714.http://www.jstor.org/stable/280677
151
Deal M, Hagstrum MB. Ceramic reuse behavior among the Maya and Wanka: Implications for Archaeology. In: Expanding archaeology. Salt Lake City: : University of Utah Press 1995. 111–25.
152
David Frankel and Jennifer M. Webb. Population, Households, and Ceramic Consumption in a Prehistoric Cypriot Village. Journal of Field Archaeology 2001;28:115–29.http://www.jstor.org/stable/3181462
153
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1983;2:117–63. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
154
Carl Heron and Richard P. Evershed. The Analysis of Organic Residues and the Study of Pottery Use. Archaeological Method and Theory 1993;5:247–84.http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170233
155
Hill JN. Pueblo: Patterns of form and function. In: New perspectives in archeology. Chicago: : Aldine 1968. 103–42.
156
Schiffer MB. Formation Processes of Broken K Pueblo: Some Hypotheses. In: Quantifying diversity in archaeology. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989. 37–58.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=add23b3e-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
157
T. J. Wilkinson. Extensive Sherd Scatters and Land-Use Intensity: Some Recent Results. Journal of Field Archaeology 1989;16:31–46.http://www.jstor.org/stable/529879
158
Rouillard SE. The Iron Age Pottery from Meare Village East. In: Somerset Levels papers. Cambridge: : Somerset Levels Project 1987. 183–221.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e8fa7103-7606-e811-80cd-005056af4099
159
Coles, J. M., Minnitt, Stephen, Somerset Levels Project, et al. ‘Industrious and fairly civilized’: the Glastonbury Lake Village. [Somerset]: : Somerset Levels Project and Somerset County Council Museums Service 1995.
160
Cunliffe, Barry W. Iron Age communities in Britain: an account of England, Scotland and Wales from the seventh century BC until the Roman conquest. 4th ed. London: : Routledge 2005.
161
Cunliffe, Barry W., Brown, Lisa, Ambrose, Tim, et al. Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire. London: : Council for British Archaeology 1984. http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/cba_rr/rr73b.cfm
162
Gibson, Alex M. Prehistoric pottery in Britain & Ireland. Stroud: : Tempus 2002.
163
Moore T. Perceiving communities: Exchange, landscapes and social networks in the later Iron Age of Western Britain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 2007;26:79–102. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0092.2007.00274.x
164
Orme BJ, Coles JM, Sturdy CR. Meare Lake Village West: a report on recent work. In: Somerset Levels papers. Cambridge: : Somerset Levels Project 1979. 6–17.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ca13ba0c-7906-e811-80cd-005056af4099
165
Peacock DPS. A petrological Study of Certain Iron Age Pottery from Western England. In: Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. London: : Prehistoric Society 1968. 414–27. doi:10.1017/S0079497X00013967
166
Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. The study of later prehistoric pottery: general policies. Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group 1991. http://www.pcrg.org.uk/News_pages/PCRG%20Gudielines%203rd%20Edition%20%282010%29.pdf
167
Rouillard SE. The Iron Age Pottery from Meare Village East. In: Somerset Levels papers. Cambridge: : Somerset Levels Project 1987. 183–221.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e8fa7103-7606-e811-80cd-005056af4099
168
Hill, J. D., Woodward, Ann, Prehistoric Ceramics Research Group. Prehistoric Britain: the ceramic basis. Oxford: : Oxbow 2002.
169
Welcome to the PCRG. http://www.pcrg.org.uk/
