1
Brewer CA. Designing better maps: a guide for GIS users. Redlands, Calif: ESRI Press 2005.
2
DeMers MN. Fundamentals of geographic information systems. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley 2009.
3
de Smith M, Longley P, Goodchild M. Geospatial Analysis. 2021. https://www.spatialanalysisonline.com/HTML/index.html
4
Heywood I, Cornelius S, Carver S. An introduction to geographical information systems. 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education 2006.
5
Longley P, et al. Geographic information systems & science. 3rd ed. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons 2011.
6
Baily B, Nowell D. Techniques for monitoring coastal change: a review and case study. Ocean & Coastal Management. 1996;32:85–95. doi: 10.1016/S0964-5691(96)00058-0
7
Barfoot PJ, Tucker JJ. Geomorphological changes at Blakeney Point. Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists Society. 1980;25:49–60.
8
Bernhardsen T. Geographic information systems: an introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley 1999.
9
Bock M. Remote sensing and GIS-based techniques for the classification and monitoring of biotopes: Case examples for a wet grass- and moor land area in Northern Germany. Journal for Nature Conservation. 2003;11:145–55. doi: 10.1078/1617-1381-00050
10
Boteva D, Griffiths G, Dimopoulos P. Evaluation and mapping of the conservation significance of habitats using GIS: an example from Crete, Greece. Journal for Nature Conservation. ;12:237–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2004.09.002
11
Burningham H. Meso-scale morphological changes in the Loughros More estuary. Proceedings of Littoral 2002: The Changing Coast. 2002;265–70. http://sheskinmore.wordpress.com/research/
12
Dong Z, Wang X, Chen G. Monitoring sand dune advance in the Taklimakan Desert. Geomorphology. ;35:219–31. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00039-8
13
Draper D, et al. Application of GIS in plant conservation programmes in Portugal. Biological Conservation. ;113:337–49. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00125-3
14
Ekebom J, Erkkila A. Using aerial photography for identification of marine and coastal habitats under the EU’s Habitats Directive. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. ;13:287–304. doi: 10.1002/aqc.553
15
Fromard F, Vega C, Proisy C. Half a century of dynamic coastal change affecting mangrove shorelines of French Guiana. A case study based on remote sensing data analyses and field surveys. Marine Geology. ;208:265–80. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.04.018
16
Leeks GJL, et al. The LOIS river monitoring network: strategy and implementation. Science of The Total Environment. ;194–195:101–9. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05356-9
17
Letsinger SL. Evaluation of Riparian Buffer Zones using GIS and Remote Sensing to Target Watershed Restoration Efforts. 2004. http://igs.indiana.edu/WatershedHydrology/RiparianBuffers.cfm
18
Koch T. The Map as Intent: Variations on the Theme of John Snow. Cartographica. 2004;39:1–15.
19
Maddrell RJ. Managed coastal retreat, reducing flood risks and protection costs, Dungeness Nuclear Power Station, UK. Coastal Engineering. ;28:1–15. doi: 10.1016/0378-3839(95)00035-6
20
Manson FJ, Loneragan NR, Phinn SR. Spatial and temporal variation in distribution of mangroves in Moreton Bay, subtropical Australia: a comparison of pattern metrics and change detection analyses based on aerial photographs. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. ;57:653–66. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00405-5
21
McGregor SJ. An integrated geographic information system approach for modeling the suitability of conifer habitat in an alpine environment. Geomorphology. ;21:265–80. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00066-4
22
McKenna et al. J. Obsolete Maps and Coastal Management: Case Studies from Northwest Ireland. Coastal Management. 2003;31:229–46.
23
Moore T, et al. An Expert System for Integrated Coastal Zone Management: A Geomorphological Case Study. Marine Pollution Bulletin. ;37:361–70. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00129-0
24
Nams VO, Mowat G, Panian MA. Determining the spatial scale for conservation purposes – an example with grizzly bears. Biological Conservation. ;128:109–19. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.020
25
Neilson B, Costello MJ. The Relative Lengths of Seashore Substrata Around the Coastline of Ireland as Determined by Digital Methods in a Geographical Information System. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. ;49:501–8. doi: 10.1006/ecss.1999.0507
26
Duane Nellis M, Harrington JA, Wu J. Remote sensing of temporal and spatial variations in pool size, suspended sediment, turbidity, and Secchi depth in Tuttle Creek Reservoir, Kansas: 1993. Geomorphology. ;21:281–93. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00067-6
27
Pedersen ÅØ, Nyhuus S, Blindheim T, et al. Implementation of a GIS-based management tool for conservation of biodiversity within the municipality of Oslo, Norway. Landscape and Urban Planning. ;68:429–38. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00148-8
28
Perotto-Baldiviezo HL, et al. GIS-based spatial analysis and modeling for landslide hazard assessment in steeplands, southern Honduras. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ;103:165–76. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2003.10.011
29
Salem BB. Application of GIS to biodiversity monitoring. Journal of Arid Environments. ;54:91–114. doi: 10.1006/jare.2001.0887
30
Sear DA, Newson MD. Environmental change in river channels: a neglected element. Towards geomorphological typologies, standards and monitoring. Science of The Total Environment. ;310:17–23. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00619-8
31
Thompson S, et al. Identifying potential breeding sites for the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus) in the UK. Journal for Nature Conservation. ;12:229–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2004.07.002
32
Thorbjarnarson J, et al. Regional habitat conservation priorities for the American crocodile. Biological Conservation. ;128:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.013
33
Walsh SJ, Butler DR, Malanson GP. An overview of scale, pattern, process relationships in geomorphology: a remote sensing and GIS perspective. Geomorphology. ;21:183–205. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(97)00057-3
34
White K, El Asmar HM. Monitoring changing position of coastlines using Thematic Mapper imagery, an example from the Nile Delta. Geomorphology. ;29:93–105. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00008-2
35
van der Meulen F, Witter JV, Arens SM. The use of a GIS in assessing the impacts of sea level rise on nature conservation along the Dutch coast: 1990–2090. Landscape Ecology. ;6:105–13. doi: 10.1007/BF00157750
36
Vitek JD, Giardino JR, Fitzgerald JW. Mapping geomorphology: A journey from paper maps, through computer mapping to GIS and Virtual Reality. Geomorphology. ;16:233–49. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(96)80003-1
37
Band LE. Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models. Water Resources Research. ;22:15–24. doi: 10.1029/WR022i001p00015
38
Carmona CP, Röder A, Azcárate FM, et al. Grazing management or physiography? Factors controlling vegetation recovery in Mediterranean grasslands. Ecological Modelling. ;251:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.12.005
39
Chen C-Y, Yu F-C. Morphometric analysis of debris flows and their source areas using GIS. Geomorphology. ;129:387–97. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.002
40
Dalton T, Thompson R, Jin D. Mapping human dimensions in marine spatial planning and management: An example from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Marine Policy. ;34:309–19. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.08.001
41
Dartnell P, et al. Multibeam sonar mapping and modeling of a submerged bryophyte mat in Crater Lake, Oregon. 2008. http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/366/
42
Kienzle S. The Effect of DEM Raster Resolution on First Order, Second Order and Compound Terrain Derivatives. Transactions in GIS. ;8:83–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2004.00169.x
43
Leonard PB, et al. Remote detection of small wetlands in the Atlantic coastal plain of North America: Local relief models, ground validation, and high-throughput computing. Forest Ecology and Management. ;284:107–15. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.034
44
Lundblad ER, et al. A Benthic Terrain Classification Scheme for American Samoa. Marine Geodesy. 2006;29:89–111. doi: 10.1080/01490410600738021
45
Miller SN, et al. The Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment tool. Environmental Modelling & Software. ;22:365–77. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.004
46
Naito AT, Cairns DM. Relationships between Arctic shrub dynamics and topographically derived hydrologic characteristics. Environmental Research Letters. ;6. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045506
47
Rozo MG, Nogueira ACR, Truckenbrodt W. The anastomosing pattern and the extensively distributed scroll bars in the middle Amazon River. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. ;37:1471–88. doi: 10.1002/esp.3249
48
Rumsby B. Vertical accretion rates in fluvial systems: a comparison of volumetric and depth-based estimates. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. ;25:617–31. doi: 10.1002/1096-9837(200006)25:6<617::AID-ESP99>3.0.CO;2-Z
49
Rumsby BT, Macklin MG. Channel and floodplain response to recent abrupt climate change: The tyne basin, Northern England. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. ;19:499–515. doi: 10.1002/esp.3290190603
50
Sørensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J. On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. ;10:101–12. doi: 10.5194/hess-10-101-2006
51
Tarboton DG, Bras RL, Rodriguez-Iturbe I. On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrological Processes. ;5:81–100. doi: 10.1002/hyp.3360050107
52
Teng J, Vaze J, Tuteja NK, et al. A GIS-Based Tool for Spatial and Distributed Hydrological Modelling: CLASS Spatial Analyst. Transactions in GIS. ;12:209–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01096.x
53
Wilson MFJ, et al. Multiscale Terrain Analysis of Multibeam Bathymetry Data for Habitat Mapping on the Continental Slope. Marine Geodesy. ;30:3–35. doi: 10.1080/01490410701295962
54
Chaaban F, et al. Using ArcGISH Modelbuilder and Aerial Photographs to Measure Coastline Retreat and Advance: North of France. Journal of Coastal Research. 2012;28:1567–79.
55
Hall ST, Post CJ. Advanced GIS Exercise: Estimating Beach and Dune Erosion in Coastal South Carolina. Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education. 2008;37:49–52.
56
Wright DJ, Heyman WD. Introduction to the Special Issue: Marine and Coastal GIS for Geomorphology, Habitat Mapping, and Marine Reserves. Marine Geodesy. ;31:223–30. doi: 10.1080/01490410802466306
57
Greco SE, Plant RE. Temporal mapping of riparian landscape change on the Sacramento river, miles 196–218, California, USA. Landscape Research. ;28:405–26. doi: 10.1080/0142639032000150149
58
Estes JE. Some applications of aerial infrared imagery. Lawrence, KS: Allen Press Inc 1966.
59
Sheppard CRC, et al. Habitat mapping in the Caribbean for management and conservation: Use and assessment of aerial photography. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. ;5:277–98. doi: 10.1002/aqc.3270050404
60
Taylor JC, Brewer TR, Bird AC. Monitoring landscape change in the National Parks of England and Wales using aerial photo interpretation and GIS. International Journal of Remote Sensing. ;21:2737–52. doi: 10.1080/01431160050110269
61
Kadmon R, Harari-Kremer R. Studying Long-Term Vegetation Dynamics Using Digital Processing of Historical Aerial Photographs. Remote Sensing of Environment. ;68:164–76. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00109-6
62
Sutherland J. Error analysis of Ordnance Survey map tidelines, UK. Proceedings of the ICE - Maritime Engineering. ;165:189–97. doi: 10.1680/maen.2011.10
