1.
ALI MADANIPOUR. Ambiguities of urban design. The Town Planning Review. 1997;68(3):363-383. http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/27798254?seq=5#page_scan_tab_contents
2.
Biddulph M. The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 2012;17(1):1-20. doi:10.1080/13574809.2011.646251
3.
Talen E. Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design. 2006;11(1):1-32. doi:10.1080/13574800500490588
4.
Dovey K, Pafka E. The urban density assemblage: Modelling multiple measures. URBAN DESIGN International. 2014;19(1):66-76. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.13
5.
Kropf, Karl. Morphological investigations: Cutting into the substance of urban form. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=2&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84855208538&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84855208538&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=2&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Morphological%20investigations%3A%20cutting%20into%20the%20substance%20of%20urban%20form&dstmp=1481111860322
6.
Montgomery J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 1998;3(1):93-116. doi:10.1080/13574809808724418
7.
Degen MM, Rose G. The Sensory Experiencing of Urban Design: The Role of Walking and Perceptual Memory. Urban Studies. 2012;49(15):3271-3287. doi:10.1177/0042098012440463
8.
Sepe M, Pitt M. The characters of place in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International. 2014;19(3):215-227. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.32
9.
Gjerde M. Visual evaluation of urban streetscapes: How do public preferences reconcile with those held by experts? URBAN DESIGN International. 2011;16(3):153-161. doi:10.1057/udi.2011.10
10.
Forsyth, Ann. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=4&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_pubtecpal%2f13575317%2f2015%2f00000020%2f00000004%2fart00002&indx=1&recIds=TN_pubtecpal%2f13575317%2f2015%2f00000020%2f00000004%2fart00002&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=4&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=What%20is%20a%20walkable%20place%3F%20The%20walkability%20debate%20in%20urban%20design&dstmp=1481114407403
11.
Brenner N. What is critical urban theory? City. 2009;13(2-3):198-207. doi:10.1080/13604810902996466
12.
An Introduction to Critical Thinking by Steven D. Schafersman. http://facultycenter.ischool.syr.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Critical-Thinking.pdf
13.
Marshall, S. (2012) Science, pseudo-science and urban design. http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/30873245/udi201222a.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJ56TQJRTWSMTNPEA&Expires=1481110725&Signature=Xqavjm50es%2BdpmRHCWTMfYSLUz4%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DScience_Pseudo-Science_and_Urban_Design.pdf
14.
Cuthbert A. Whose Urban Design? Journal of Urban Design. 2010;15(3):443-448. doi:10.1080/13574809.2010.487816
15.
Cuthbert AR. Urban design: requiem for an era – review and critique of the last 50 years. Urban Design International. 2007;12(4):177-223. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200
16.
Wunderlich, F Carmona, M. Place-temporality and rhythmicity: a new aesthetics and methodological foundation for urban design theory and practice. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1389076&indx=2&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1389076&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Place-temporality%20and%20rhythmicity&dstmp=1481108304046
17.
Urban Design, Space and Society - Ali Madanipour - Palgrave Higher Education. https://he.palgrave.com/page/detail/urban-design-space-and-society-ali-madanipour/?sf1=barcode&st1=9781137023650
18.
Krieger A, Saunders WS. Urban Design. University of Minnesota Press; 2009. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttspsh
19.
Krieger A, Saunders WS. Urban Design. University of Minnesota Press; 2009. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttspsh
20.
Tonkiss F. Cities by Design: The Social Life of Urban Form. Polity; 2013.
21.
Hirt S, Zahm DL, Jacobs J. The Urban Wisdom of Jane Jacobs. Vol Planning, history and environment series. Routledge; 2012.
22.
Moreno, G. ; Steadman, P. The Relationship between Density, Built Form and Design. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84898346593&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84898346593&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20The%20relationship%20between%20density%2C%20built%20form%20and%20design&dstmp=1481110714243
23.
Montgomery J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 1998;3(1):93-116. doi:10.1080/13574809808724418
24.
Rowley A. Mixed-use Development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking? Planning Practice & Research. 1996;11(1):85-98. doi:10.1080/02697459650036477
25.
Mehta V. Lively Streets: Determining Environmental Characteristics to Support Social Behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2007;27(2):165-187. doi:10.1177/0739456X07307947
26.
Coupland A. Reclaiming the City: Mixed Use Development. E & FN Spon; 1997.
27.
Nasar JL. Does Neotraditional Development Build Community? Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2003;23(1):58-68. doi:10.1177/0739456X03256224
28.
Talen E. Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design. 2006;11(1):1-32. doi:10.1080/13574800500490588
29.
Steadman P. Density and Built Form: Integrating ‘Spacemate’ with the Work of Martin and March. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2014;41(2):341-358. doi:10.1068/b39141
30.
Measuring Density: Working Definitions for Residential Density and Building Intensity. http://www.corridordevelopment.org/pdfs/from_MDC_Website/db9.pdf
31.
Uytenhaak R, Technische Universiteit Delft. Faculteit Bouwkunde. Cities Full of Space: Qualities of Density. Eng. ed. 010; 2008.
32.
Short MJ. Planning for Tall Buildings. Routledge; 2012.
33.
Grant J. The dark side of the grid: power and urban design. Planning Perspectives. 2001;16(3):219-241. doi:10.1080/02665430152469575
34.
Marshall, S. ; Sutton, M. Explorations in Generative Street Layouts. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84898172630&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84898172630&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Explorations%20in%20generative%20street%20layouts&dstmp=1481111997917
35.
Mehta V. The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space. Routledge; 2013.
36.
Kropf, K. Ambiguity in the definition of built form. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84899503929&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84899503929&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Ambiguity%20in%20the%20definition%20of%20built%20form&dstmp=1481112089738
37.
Hebbert, M. Historical Exploration/Explanation in Urban Design. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84898256971&indx=1&recIds=TN_scopus2-s2.0-84898256971&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=%20Historical%20exploration%2Fexplanation%20in%20urban%20design&dstmp=1481112119533
38.
Moving Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Cities - CityLab. http://www.citylab.com/design/2014/11/moving-toward-an-evolutionary-theory-of-cities/381839/
39.
Jones P, Boujenko N, Marshall S. Link & Place: A Guide to Street Planning and Design. Local Transport Today; 2007.
40.
Lynch K. A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press; 1981.
41.
Montgomery J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 1998;3(1):93-116. doi:10.1080/13574809808724418
42.
Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House; 1961.
43.
Gehl J. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1987.
44.
Jiang B. Street hierarchies: a minority of streets account for a majority of traffic flow. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2009;23(8):1033-1048. doi:10.1080/13658810802004648
45.
Cullen G. The Concise Townscape. Architectural Press; 1971.
46.
Banerjee T, Loukaitou-Sideris A. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge; 2011.
47.
Sepe M, Pitt M. The characters of place in urban design. URBAN DESIGN International. 2014;19(3):215-227. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.32
48.
Buttimer A, Seamon D. The Human Experience of Space and Place. Croom Helm; 1980.
49.
Wunderlich, FM. Walking and Rhythmicity: Sensing Urban Space. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1314823&indx=1&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1314823&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Walking%20and%20Rhythmicity%3A%20Sensing%20Urban%20Space&dstmp=1481113818322
50.
Wunderlich, F. Place-temporality and urban place-rhythms in urban analysis and design: an aesthetic akin to music. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=UCL_EPR_DS1360918&indx=2&recIds=UCL_EPR_DS1360918&recIdxs=1&elementId=1&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Place-temporality%20and%20urban%20place-rhythms%20in%20Urban%20Analysis%20and%20Design&dstmp=1481113928607
51.
Questions to Ask A Space. https://placesjournal.org/assets/legacy/pdfs/questions-to-ask-a-space.pdf
52.
Gehl J. Cities for People. Island Press; 2010.
53.
Forsyth, Ann. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=4&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_pubtecpal%2f13575317%2f2015%2f00000020%2f00000004%2fart00002&indx=1&recIds=TN_pubtecpal%2f13575317%2f2015%2f00000020%2f00000004%2fart00002&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=4&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=What%20is%20a%20walkable%20place%3F%20The%20walkability%20debate%20in%20urban%20design&dstmp=1481114407403
54.
Nasar, Jack. Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/display.do?frbrVersion=11&tabs=detailsTab&ct=display&fn=search&doc=TN_proquest1292765198&indx=1&recIds=TN_proquest1292765198&recIdxs=0&elementId=0&renderMode=poppedOut&displayMode=full&frbrVersion=11&frbg=&&dscnt=0&scp.scps=scope%3A%28UCL%29%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&tb=t&mode=Basic&vid=UCL_VU1&srt=rank&tab=local&dum=true&vl(freeText0)=Urban%20Design%20Aesthetics.%20The%20evaluative%20Qualities%20of%20Building%20Exteriors&dstmp=1481114486104
55.
Adkins A, Dill J, Luhr G, Neal M. Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness. Journal of Urban Design. 2012;17(4):499-510. doi:10.1080/13574809.2012.706365
56.
Spencer C, Woolley H. Children and the city: a summary of recent environmental psychology research. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2000;26(3):181-198. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2214.2000.00125.x
57.
Lefaivre L, Döll H. Ground up City: Play as a Design Tool. 010 Publishers; 2007.
58.
Stevens Q. The Ludic City: Exploring the Potential of Public Spaces. Routledge; 2007.
59.
Franck KA, Stevens Q. Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life. Routledge; 2007.
60.
Sepe M. Places and perceptions in contemporary city. URBAN DESIGN International. 2013;18(2):111-113. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.1
61.
Urban Play: designing the urban landscape | The Mobile City. http://themobilecity.nl/2008/11/03/urban-play/
